The Oberlin Review
FEBRUARY 6, 2015 VOLUME 143, NUMBER 12
Local News Bulletin News briefs from the past week City Council Increases Pay The Oberlin City Council has voted to raise its own pay, a move that will go into effect when the next City Council is sworn in and that will cost the city $34,723. Three City Council members opposed the increase on the grounds that the Council had recently rejected raising the minimum wage for city employees, a measure that would have cost $25,000. The higher salaries will allow City Council members to qualify for health care and pensions after recent changes to Ohio’s public employee pension law. Cleveland Police Get Body Cameras At least 200 Cleveland police officers have begun wearing body cameras as part of a pilot program that will eventually include the entire department. The cameras are intended to provide accountability and reduce the use of excessive force by officers. The move comes after the shooting of Tamir Rice, an unarmed Black 12-year-old, by Timothy Loehmann, a Cleveland police officer. In December, a Justice Department study criticized the department for consistently using excessive force over a three-year period. Pipeline Meeting Held Last Tuesday at Lorain County Community College, Spectra Energy, a natural gas company, held a community meeting. Representatives from Spectra and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission discussed plans for the 250-mile NEXUS pipeline. Officials shifted the proposed pipeline route, which will pass through southern Oberlin, slightly further south this January. Outside the meeting, a group of activists protested the pipeline, which they say violates local law and threatens the health of the community.
Council Clashes over City Manager Elizabeth Dobbins News Editor After requesting the resignation of City Manager Eric Norenberg last month, the Oberlin City Council plans to air its concerns and discuss the low yearly evaluation scores Norenberg received in an executive session this Monday. “I’m looking forward to working through this process in a way that’s satisfactory to everyone, so we can get back to doing the real work and not be so distracted by divisions in the community,” said City Council member Sharon Pearson. The Council presented Norenberg with a letter requesting his resignation on Jan. 8 with the signatures of four out of seven Council members. According to Bryan Burgess, a member of Council for the past five years, the Council is divided in its opinion of Norenberg’s performance. Burgess, Pearson and fellow Council members Elizabeth Meadows and Kristen Peterson signed the letter, and all gave Norenberg low yearly scores, with the exception of Pearson, who did not participate in the numerical portion of the evaluations. City Council member Ron Rimbert also presented Norenberg with low scores but did not sign the letter.
Rick McDaniel, an Oberlin resident and former head of Safety and Security, complains about the lack of transparency regarding the City Council’s request for the city manager’s resignation. Eric Norenberg, the city manager, has refused to resign. Simeon Deutsch
However, the president of the City Council, Scott Broadwell, and Vice President Sharon Fairchild-Soucy both gave Norenberg’s yearly performance a high rating. The city charter requires a 5–2 supermajority and the opportunity for a public hearing to officially dismiss a city manager. The vote to request his resignation
was 4–3. Norenberg declined the request, stating in a letter to the Council that he is “committed to the city of Oberlin” and “stand[s] by [his] record of leadership, management and decisions.” The request for his resignation was delivered months after the start of the evaluation process in Oct. 2014. Norenberg said
he was aware the evaluation process took longer than it had in past years, but was surprised by the Council’s decision. “I had been looking forward to meeting with the Council to sit down and discuss my evaluation and was not anticipating that there was anything significant See Yearly, page 4
Steering Committee Adds 6 Student Positions Louis Krauss Staff Writer Student Senate announced the introduction of six new student positions on the College Strategic Planning Steering Committee this Thursday — a change which the administration and Senate hope will provide better representation for the student body during the Committee’s long-term planning process, which determines the trajectory of the College for the next several years. After demonstrators last semester challenged the administration’s lack of transparency, Student Senate began working with President Marvin Krislov, Diane Yu and the other trustees to add six spots for current students to the Committee. Student Senate pushed for this change at the end of last semester when it realized students needed more of a voice on the Steering Committee, according to Student Senator and College sophomore Jordan Ecker. “It’s a 37-member committee, and prior to this they only had three students, but it’s pretty
clear to me that the decisions they’re making are going to be affecting the students more than any other group,” said Ecker. “So because of this I think you need to involve students’ voices as much as possible.” Before the additions, the Steering Committee was a group of 37, consisting of select administrators, faculty, trustees and students. Roughly every 10 years, a new Steering Committee is convened to design a Strategic Plan, which contains all of the College’s long-term decisions about admissions, diversity and strategies to increase revenue. Previously, there were only three students on this panel, who were selected by the trustees after being reviewed by Senate. Students applying for the new positions will undergo a different selection process, according to Ecker. Three of the six new students will be chosen by a vote that all students can participate in, while the other three will be chosen by Student Senate. These additional student spots are an attempt to provide a way for students unhappy
Rookie Sensations
Jesse Rowsell The community remembers a beloved Chemistry professor.
ESTABLISHED 1874 oberlinreview.org
ONLINE & IN PRINT
Sounding Off Christine Sun Kim pushes the boundaries of sound.
See page 2
See page 14
See page 11
INDEX:
Opinions 5
The Review sat down with a pair of firstyear track and field stars.
This Week in Oberlin 8
Arts 10
Sports 16
with the Steering Committee’s decisions to air their concerns. Student Senator and College fourth-year Megs Bautista said if the College wants to improve diversity, it doesn’t make sense to simultaneously plan to raise tuition. “As an institution moving towards prioritizing financial accessibility, how does it make sense that their goal is also to increase revenue in the next 10 years?” said Bautista. “In the Student Senate, all our sirens went off, because one of our main priorities is to increase accessibility to low-income students and people of color.” However, while having more students on the panel could improve relations between the student body and administrators, it may not affect the lack of student interest in applying for Oberlin’s long-term planning groups, such as the Student Senate and now the Steering Committee. Bautista said many people of color are See Senate, page 4
on the
WEB
All of the content you see here is also available on our website. Check back for the latest stories and interactive polls. Visit oberlinreview.org and facebook. com/oberlinreview and follow us on Twitter @oberlinreview and Instagram @ocreview.