Global Film Fest plays at TRU Pg. 7
The Omega
Volume 23, Issue 19 February 12, 2014
Ω
Thompson Rivers University’s Independent Student Newspaper
News
Editorial & Opinion
Life & Community
Arts & Entertainment
Sports
Pages 1, 2
Pages 3, 9
Page 5
Pages 6, 7
Page 11
Somewhere to study A formal proposal to investigate study space concerns is moving forward Jessica Klymchuk Ω News Editor Trying to find a quiet place to work? Getting booted out of the library at 9 p.m.? The student caucus has heard your complaints and is addressing concerns about a lack of study space on campus. Student representatives on the student engagement committee, a sub-committee of the Senate, are currently putting together a proposal that suggests a study be conducted to determine how much study space is available on campus, if any is being underutilized and what changes students would like to see. Janice Yeung and Chirag Sehgal’s proposal asks the institutional planning and analysis committee to conduct a report on available study space, which will determine if student concerns being raised in the student caucus about a lack of space are valid. They want to know how much space is available, the level of privacy the space has, whether it’s suited for group work or individual study and when it is available. Yeung
and Sehgal are also proposing that a survey be distributed to students to establish what perceptions they have about study space, whether group or individual space is in demand and what the preferable hours are. “With this data we can better inform the students and find out what they want to do,” Yeung said. Although Yeung said this research will help in developing plans for the future, they aren’t jumping to conclusions. The first step is getting the proposal put forward at the next student engagement committee meeting at the end of February. Yeung said they have received support from other members of the committee, including Craig Engleson and Harold Richins. Dean of students Christine Adam said she couldn’t comment on the proposal because she hasn’t yet seen it, but she did point out that the Old Main computer labs are open 24/7 Monday through Saturday. The House of Learning is accessible until midnight.
See GRAD 2014 Pg.
5
Student representatives on the student engagement committee are putting forth a proposal to assess whether there is enough study space on campus and if any is being under-utilized. ( Jessica Klymchuk/ The Omega)
Alternative parking rates being suggested include a half-day rate of $3 for four hours in central parking lots, a dedicated carpool lot and a discounted rate of $4 per day in lot N. ( Jessica Klymchuk/ The Omega)
Parking roulette Proposal to change parking rates aims to defuse complaints Jessica Klymchuk Ω News Editor Playing the not-paying-for-parking game isn’t very much fun when you lose. Paying the $5 price to park all day is a lot easier on the student budget than the $50 fine (or $25 if you pay within seven days) for dodging the day rate, but students are still finding it steep. Will George, the student rep on the parking appeals and advisory committee, is taking complaints about expensive parking head-on. A proposal suggesting some adjustments to campus parking has been drafted and will be be presented to the committee, which makes recommendations to the vice president of administration and finance for policy changes and to the facilities services division for operational changes. The proposal suggests half-day rates ($3 for four hours for central parking lots), a dedicated carpool lot and a discounted rate in Lot N at $4 per day. It will be presented at the parking appeals and advisory committee’s next meeting, which is yet to be scheduled. George said he is confident that the committee will be in favour of the recommendations. “When talking to students about
parking rates everyone wants something to change but it’s all about taking the right steps and developing a proposal that meets the financial needs of the institution as well as the students’ needs,” George said. In addition to the murmur around campus, George said the expense of
faculty. George consulted with Glass and Ross over the student complaints that were “filed” in the complaint box and said students generally feel the increase in parking over the past couple of years is just another burden on them. “We are trying to do a balanced proposal between TRU and students because the challenge with the parking issue is that for TRU, it’s really all about revenue,” George said. According to George, the three suggestions were prioritized from a list of ten. The half-day rate is an attempt to offer more affordable parking and more flexibility for students. Metered parking currently costs $1 per half hour with a maximum of two hours, a problem for students who might only have one three —Will George, hour class. A dedicated carpool lot is being suggested because parking appeals and there is currently a waitlist for the 40 carpool spots, it encourages advisory committee more sustainable transportation and it would be easier to enforce than having spaces throughout parking was brought up in the student campus. George said Lot N is currently caucus as a “major issue.” The mock underutilized and it’s on the outskirts parking meter, a.k.a. complaint box, of campus so it would be fair to offer a erected by fine arts students Levi Glass cheaper rate to park there. and Harrison Ross in October, garnered 95 unanimously negative complaints See OFF-CAMPUS Pg. about parking from students and
“
...for TRU, it’s all about revenue.”
2