Vol. Ill - No. 7
Jewish Students Seek United Voice
On Sunday, 'March 14, a meeting or Jewish high school students from all over New York took place in lower Manhattan. It was orgarnzcd by the American Z1omst Youth Foundation. The purpose of the conference was to give Jewish high school students a uruted voice. Stu dents from public schools such as Stuyvesant, Clmton and Bronx Sci ence as well as from yeshivas such as B.T.A. R.J.J. and Ramaz ntt.c.ndcd. Ramaz was represented by Diane Comet, Marcia Mc1slm and Marc Schulman. Jonathan Braun, the head of the Ne,1,,• York Union of Jewish Students, which represents Jews on New York college campuses, addressed the meeting. He emphasized that this was the first such gathering of Jewish youth. Delegates from various schools gave an account of the problems fac Ccntinucd on Page 4
Sophomores Make Big Splash in Tea The annual Sophomore Tea was presented on Tuesday, March 9. The program followed the traditional pat tern of songs, dances -and skits. Re freshments were served to an audi ence which was composed of parents of the students and members of other classes. The musical numbers highlighted the talents of certain individuals. Ehud Havazelet, the winner of last year's talent show, opened and closed the show with his guitar playing. One of the original songs which he sang and played dealt with the theme of Soviet Jewry. Ben Zander performed "Rhapsody in Blue" on the piano and later accompanied vocalist Diane Osen. Several folk dances were pre sented, one of which was chorea-
March, 1971
A Free Publication
5-Doy Seminar Held in Monsey Students Hear Rabbis
From February 25 to March 2 the Monsey Pork Hotel 111 Monscy, New York was populnted with 158 students from Ramaz nnd the Yeshiva of Flatbush, The students were pnrticipnnts m the first Yeshivn University Torah Leadership Scmmar for yeshiva stu• dents. The Seminar was arranged by the Youth Bureau of Yeshiva Uni versity. Mr. Joel Paul was the or gamzer of the Seminar and recruited the approximately twenty college students who served as counselors. About ten rabbis from the metro• politan area gave lectures, which were followed by discussions. Rabbi Robert H1rt, of Yeshiva University, spoke on various topics, including HGod is Ahvc," "Shabbat in the Messianic Age," "Jewish Attitudes Towards Marriage" and "Good and Evil." Rabbi Av1 Weiss. of Bnai Jeshurun Congregation 111 Monsey, spoke on "What Kmd o Jewish Defense do We Require?," Soviet Jewry, and "Response to the New Morality.'' in which he presented Martin Buber's "I and Thou" concept and its relation to modern sexual mores. Rabbi Moses Tendlcr of Yeshiva University lectured on "The Halachic Process" and Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, o! the Lincoln Square Synagogue in M3n• Continued on Page 4 graphed by Ruth Lachman. Each of the two participatmg: classes performed a skit. Class IVy enacted a scene from "The Odd Couple,'' and Class IVx presented "The Perils and Trials of Jane Clay." The latter, a courtroom spoof, was staged by Michael Andron, a grad uate of Ramaz. Rabbi Moskowitz acted as 1\.1.C. for the show and Rabbi Haskel Look stein entertained the parents with n few quips and anecdotes.
Sophomore Tea. - left to right: l\llchael Richman, Arthur Gribetz, Gllatt Ankori, Ron Cohen and Joel Comet In "The Perils and Trials of Jane Clay."
.._,..,�.,
Seminar - Top row, left to right: Students give 1\lr. Buchwald a "high": Supervisors: Jerry Schwartz, Joel Paul, Rena Kurz, David Gitler. Bottom row, left to right: Rabbi Hirt; Jlabbl Samuel Rubenstein teachlng tefillin repair; Rabbi Shlomo Riskin.
Judaic Studies: Evaluations and Pro1wsals
by Victor In a recent poll Rmnaz students gave their sugccstions as to how the Judaic studies might be 1mp1ovcd Tn o?aerlo supplement these findings several editors of The Ram Page con ducted a round-tlble discussion on the same topic, in wh1ch one random Jy selected member of each class p:irtic1pated. The participnnts were: Gil Karson, Illx; Miriam Wrob lewski, Illy; Rebecca Green, IVx; David Orwasher, IVy; Diane Comet, Vx: Stanhy Herman, Vy; Gail Linden, Vix; and Sonia Taitz. Vly. The students' proposals for change fall into four major categories: hir ing better teachers; redefining the goals of the Judaic studies; a student role in planning courses; the use of modern teaching methods. The students voiced various com• plaints about the present Judaic studies faculty. The consensus was that many teachers arc either not dedi• cated enough or are lacking certain qualities necessary for good teach ing. The students explained that many members of the Judaic studies faculty have been at Ramaz much longer thnn the secular studies teachers. As a result they tend to be inUcx1blc in their teaching methods and fmd 1t difI1cull to overcome their pedagogical inertia. Many teachers do not use lesson plans and frequently enter the class room un prepared. Some teachers do not even try to be interesting and often pur posely omit "relevant topics like sex." In speaking of the teachers' in• tolerance for non-orthodox view• points, the students recalled th;.tt cerlain teachers take offense when Biblical commentators arc criticized. Some Judaic stuci1es teachers arc con-
Schonfeld s1dered unquah�:cd to teach at Ha maz because th�y do not speak He• btc,v properly Mos: students feel that all classes m Judaica should be conducted or.ly in Hebrew. The Judaic studies teachers were asked to express their views on Jewish education at Ramaz. Mr. Ephraim Buchwald said that he chose tcachmg as a profession be• cause as a student he had had many bad teachers. He believes that teach• ers should strive to instill in the1r students a love for Judaica. Like the students, he cha:gcd thnt many Ra• maz teachers show that they are not committed to this goal by not pre paring adequntely for their lessons. He added, however, that this is m part due to the dearth of pubhshed materials in the field of Jewish edu cation. He suggested as a. solution to this problem the establishment of a cen• tcr for the collection and publication of textbooks and other materials for Jewish education. Rabbi Snmuel Klein said that teachers should be enthusiastic, and m addition should respect nnd try to understand students• problems in an open-minded fashion. The students asserted that Ramaz must emphasize living Judaism rather than Jewish scholarship. One said that the purpose of Jewish education should be to teach "who you are, where you are, and why you are here." But the students claimed that they arc not even motivated to read about Judaism on their own. It wris suggested that the methods used at the recent Torah Leadership Seminar become an intcgrnl part of the JuContinued on Page -I