AWA R D-W INNING CENTR A LR ECOR DER .COM Wednesday, April 4, 2012
University Secures Student’s Safety With Sexual Assualt Policy
Central Connecticut State University
Volume 108 No. 23
Is Porn a Public Service?
sArA m. berry the recorder
The campus community came together to work on a new Sexual Misconduct Protocol that is expected to go into effect on April 14 and is in its final stages of revision after being formulated since 2010. In the fall of 2010, allegations that thenPsychology Professor and Chief Diversity Officer Moises Salinas had sexually assaulted student Krystal Rich became public, with no sexual assault policy present. “When I was assaulted by Dr. Salinas on campus there was no policy to protect me, in terms of sexual assault. All we had was a sexual harassment policy at the time,” said Rich. “Shortly after that, the SART committee started being very active and a subcommittee was formed where they started drafting the policy.” The following fall, Rich and Associate Professor of Psychology Joanne DiPlacido did an anonymous on-line study of 2900 CCSU students, revealing that 33 percent of females and 12 percent of males have experienced some kind of sexual harassment or sexual assault while in college. The results of the study were presented to the University and the committee working on the drafting of the sexual misconduct policy. The policy itself went into effect in October 2011 and is also available on CCSU’s website. “There was no policy in place, and I think this is something that schools don’t want to talk about, and it took a case with somebody who was very persistent and followed through and ended up bringing changes and fortunately, it’s because of her that [Salinas] is off campus,” said DiPlacido. The Sexual Assault and Interpersonal Violence Resource Team was then formed in June 2010 and is made up of representatives from the Women’s Center, Health Services, Counseling and Wellness, the Office of Diversity and Equity, the Committee on the Concerns of Women, the LGBT Center, and the University Police, as well as the YWCA and Prudence Crandall Center in New Britain. “A subcommittee grew out of that group, that actually put together the initial draft of that policy. And then it went through numerous iterations and so forth and so the process has taken over a year and a half,” said Dr. Laura Tordenti, Vice President of Student Affairs. “It’s been a good process and I think it’s a good policy.” The subcommittee, chaired by CCSU Chief of Police Jason Powell, wrote the initial draft of the policy. The policy was then sent to Tordenti, the Chief Diversity Officer Rosa Rodriguez, and Carolyn Magnan, Counsel to the President, who revised the policy in consultation with Human Resources in order to make sure it did not violate any individual
see ASSAULT - page 5
In this issue...
Ian Mangione (left) and Eric Bergenn (right) debating the merits of porn being a public service last week.
dAniel sAunders | the reCorder
AmAndA webster the recorder
Students from CCSU and Cambridge University were brought together to argue the merits of the adult entertainment industry as a public service last tuesday evening in Semesters lounge in the Student Center. According to Eric Bergenn, President of the Student Government Association, the viewpoints expressed during the debate were
not necessarily the personal views of the students participating in the debate. Bergenn and CCSU junior Ian Mangione were teamed up with Maria English and Alex Gordon-Brown of Cambridge University to argue that pornography is not a public service. Their opponents were CCSU Student Government Association Senators Sky Morrell and Ryan Baldassario. Cambridge students Matt Hazell and Tom Powell joined
them. “It’s a public service because it provides safety in sexuality,” Morrell said in her opening argument. “It allows people to explore their sexuality in a safe way.” No type of sexuality or interest was left untouched in this debate, and at one point the term,“bunnyphilia” was even used.
see PORN - page 5
Mulrooney Gets Blitzed Over Faculty Listserv Professor Outraged Over His Exile From Public Forum justin muszynski
“If a faculty member tells another faculty member, ‘this is an event which excludes faculty,’ then there’s an obvious contradiction,” said Blitz. “I stand by my decision,” said Mulrooney. Mulrooney says after hearing many of the concerns students had, he believes that keeping faculty absent from the event was beneficial. He will submit his report to the provost and the graduation and retention rate council, which he is a member of. He also says he’s unsure whether he could have forced Blitz to leave because it was technically an “open forum.” After exiting the forum, Blitz sent an email over the faculty list server voicing his concerns about not being allowed to attend the event. “In 23 years as a faculty member, I have never been thrown out of a public meeting at the University,” said Blitz in the email. He went on to add that a meeting held in a public room in the student center cannot be considered a private one. He also pointed out that to exclude all faculty members but one
is “inconsistent.” He also says he is unsure of what his future intentions are. He is debating whether or not to ask for a copy of the video that was taken at the event under the Freedom of Information Act. His concern is that the notes taken by Mulrooney may not reflect exactly what the students were trying to convey and he’s very interested given that the main topic debated was advising and he is an advisor himself. SGA President Eric Bergen, who co-hosted the event, says it was a miscommunication and doesn’t blame either party. “They’re both right,” said Bergenn. He also said that because the issue of advising was one of the major ones by students, a student might think twice about voicing their concerns if their advisor was present. He added that an email was sent out to faculty asking them to invite their students to participate and it didn’t clearly tell them that faculty was not welcome. “It was a small misunderstanding and if I get a chance to catch up with both of them I’ll make sure everything’s cool,” said Bergenn.
UPGRADE: ‘Off-Center’ Magazine Review Page 7 Follow Us On Twitter: @TheRecorder
SPORTS: Softball Splits Weekend Series Page 10
the recorder
At the SGA’s open forum designed to allow student to voice their concerns about what’s causing low graduation rates at CCSU Monday, David Blitz, chair of the philosophy department, engaged in a disagreement with James Mulrooney, chair of the biomolecular sciences department, after he expressed his concern that faculty being present would influence the students’ opinions. Blitz’s and Mulrooney’s accounts of the event differ slightly. “I asked him nicely to leave and explained that it was intended to be a student only forum,” said Mulrooney. “He said you have to leave this is student only, faculty are not allowed,” said Blitz referring to Mulrooney. Mulrooney says that when he approached the SGA about putting on this event it was understood that he would be the only faculty member present to take notes and put a report together of his findings.