AWA R D-W INNING CENTR A LR ECOR DER .COM Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Central Connecticut State University
Volume 108 No. 04
Blue Devils One Step Ahead of Seahawks
kenny baRto | the RecoRDeR
Miller Explains Purpose of University ‘Report Card’ kaSSonDRa GRanata the Recorder
President Jack Miller recently created a CCSU report card in an attempt to grade the progress made on goals in the University’s 2005 strategic plan. The report card, distributed to administrators and faculty in a speech before the start of this academic term, evaluates each goal and assigns a letter grade to draw attention to each area of focus. “It’s a grade of the institution’s progress, not any department or person in particular,” Miller said. “If there was anyone to put blame on for the University’s progress, it would be me.” Miller said the mission of CCSU is to produce broadly educated, culturally and globally aware students who will continue to spread their knowledge after graduation. The report card,
he believes, will help realign faculty and staff in pursuit of this mission. Miller’s report card contains four different areas of focus: International Education, Workforce and State Economic Development, Community Engagement and Interdisciplinary Studies and Cross-Curricular Initiatives. Under each element, there are objectives listing the University’s goals with a letter grade reviewing their success so far. “I thought since we’ve been at these goals for five years, it’s time to do something more formal,” Miller said. Miller sat down at the end of the summer and reviewed each objective, personally assigning a letter grade to each goal and referred it to the executive REPORTCARD| COnT. On 3
Rate My Professor: A Professor’s Perspective Jonathan Stankiewicz the Recorder
Dr. David Cappella, a recently tenured CCSU English professor, is in his 42nd year teaching. He has been frustrated for years by the advent of websites such as ratemyprofessor.com, “RMP,” because he feels it is “self-selective evaluation.” “I was teaching at Rhode Island College when it first came out,” said Cappella, “and all the professors were talking about it. I have real problems with it; it’s not real. You either love the person or you hate the person, it’s not a true evaluation.” Cappella feels as though websites like RMP hinder the art of teaching. “If you start playing to the crowd and I started teaching according to what students want, students wouldn’t learn anything and I wouldn’t be a good teacher.
It’s like a ball player or anybody that’s an artist trying to cater to the crowd. Then you lose authenticity. And you lose reality. You lose yourself. I won’t do that,” Cappella said. Most students today know that RMP, currently owned by MTV, is the largest online professor rating source with more than 6,500 schools and over 10 million comments from colleges in the U.S., Canada and the United Kingdom. Students can “like” it on Facebook, “follow” it on Twitter, and even download the app to their iPhones. Students are able to rate professors on several dimensions: “easiness,” “helpfulness,” “clarity,” and their own interest in the class. The lowest score is 0, the highest 5. The easiness category is not included in the scoring. “The Overall Quality rating is the average of a teacher’s
helpfulness and clarity ratings, and is what determines the type of ‘smiley face’ that the teacher receives,” says RMP. Responses can be anonymous, as they usually are, but students have the option of registering an account. Today, over 1,200 CCSU professors are rated on RMP with an average professor rating of 3.25. “The professors that I know here that are good are damn good! There are some damn good teachers in this school,” Cappella said. “There are also some people that are on cruise control and the students know who they are. So that’s got nothing to do with Rate My Professor. The students really know who’s good.” However, Cappella later mentioned that part of his problem with RMP is that students are the
FOR BREAKING NEWS VISIT: www.centralrecorder.com
RATE| COnT. On 4