RyeCity REVIEW THE
September 23, 2016 | Vol. 4, Number 39 | www.ryecityreview.com
Council allots more money for Crown Castle study By JAMES PERO Staff Writer
Tying the town pink
Local-based cancer support group, Soul Ryeders, has been granted permission to display pink ribbons throughout the city during the month of October for its third annual “TieTheTownPink” campaign. October is also Breast Cancer Awareness Month. For story, see page 6. Photo courtesy Soul Ryeders
Rye Town Park privatization lawsuit being appealed By FRANCO FINO Staff Writer The town of Rye and the Rye Town Park Commission have appealed a recent appellate court ruling that allows the city of Rye to impose a real estate tax on the restaurant located on the park’s grounds, ultimately seeking to resolve the affair in the state’s
Court of Appeals. The city was served with a motion for leave on Sept. 6 to appeal to the state’s highest court by the town and the commission, in which they dispute Rye City Assessor Noreen Whitty’s decision to revoke the taxexempt status of the land where the current restaurant, Seaside Johnnies, is situated.
While the park was originally created as a public area in 1907, Rye City’s assessor determined that it would be taxable in 2011, after existing on the land for 104 years exempt from taxation by the town’s governing body. The property was initially placed on the city’s tax roll and the decision was upheld by the city Board of Assessment Review,
following Whitty’s determination that the private corporation should be deemed taxable. However, after pursuing a lawsuit against the city of Rye, the court determined that Seaside Johnnies was located on a public property and that it would be kept tax-exempt. But, on APPEAL continued on page 19
Assessing a controversial proposal by the telecommunications contractor Crown Castle will prove to be more costly than initially thought after a unanimous Rye City Council vote moved to increase the retainer for a law firm hired by the city in August. The resolution, passed at the Sept. 14 council meeting, will increase the amount of city funds allocated to the law firm Best, Best and Krieger—which is currently collaborating with an engineer to help navigate the Crown Castle proposal—from $25,000 to $50,000. Among the reasons that the council voted to increase the amount of city funds allocated to the analysis, according to Councilwoman Danielle Tagger-Epstein, a Democrat, is that the original $25,000 has already been expended. Additionally, she said, the analysis of the city’s telephone poles and how best to navigate a divisive proposal may take more time than initially expected. “When it comes to something like this, you cannot have a preconceived notion of what it takes to get it done,” she said. “There’s no quick fix, so you always have to be mindful that this is going to be an expensive process.” There’s currently no expected
date for when the City Council will receive the firm’s and engineer’s complete analysis, but the council and Crown Castle plan to meet on the matter in November. During its last meeting, the City Council also voted to transfer $150,000 from the city’s contingency account to the legal department in order to fund a myriad of ongoing outside legal services. “We have a number of cases that the attorney fees went over and above what was set aside,” City Manager Marcus Serrano said. “So, we have to take more money out of contingency to cover those.” Among the legal obligations the city is currently juggling, according to Serrano, are lawsuits between the city and the environmental advocacy group Save the Sound, an ongoing Article 78 with Westchester County over future plans for Playland, as well as matters with Crown Castle. Specifically, Best, Best and Krieger, and a hired engineer, will be tasked with assessing a proposal from Crown Castle that plans to install additional wireless equipment called nodes— which emit a radio frequency— atop dozens of telephone poles throughout the city. Backlash against the proposal—which was being carried CROWN continued on page 5
19