The Spectrum Volume 60 Issue 49

Page 1

The Independent Student Publication of the University at Buffalo MONDAY EDITION v February 7, 2011 Vol. 60 No. 49 v ubspectrum.com

Saving Hearts with Swishes UB Hoops for Hearts fundraises to save a child’s heart JAMES BOWEStaff Writer Thirty-eight teams, nearly 200 people, and six basketball courts all in one gym on one day might seem like a new NBA playoff schedule gone awry, but on Saturday, the Hoops for Hearts 3-on-3 basketball tournament may have given many a new way to look at philanthropy. A collaborative effort between new fraternity Zeta Beta Tau and the established Alpha Epsilon Pi, Hoops for Hearts sought to raise money and donate it to Save a Child’s Heart, a charity based in Israel that gives children from all over the world free treatment for various life-threatening heart conditions. Each child needs around $10,000 to be saved, an astronomical sum for many who live in third-world countries or impoverished areas. The hope for Hoops for Hearts was to reach that number. Local businesses Zetti’s and University Village at Sweethome, along with UB’s Center for Student Leadership and Community Engagement, sponsored the event by donating money and free food to sell as concessions. “They’ve been extremely good to us,” said David Siegel, a sophomore undecided major and vice president of AEPi. “We’ve been planning this since before break, and having their support is such a great thing.” Big supporters were not the only way money was raised. Tournament participants provided a $10 donation to the cause, and various gift cards to Target and local restaurants were raffled off for $1 tickets. By the second round of the tournament, nearly $5,000 had been raised.

“The beautiful thing is that as our international network of students and young professionals grow,” said Deborah Serkin, Young Leadership Director for Save a Child’s Heart. “Their collaborative efforts make a huge impact.” Although organized by ZBT and AEPi, the event united many fraternities and sororities under one roof. Many teams were comprised of fraternities and sororities, and many others came out just to watch, support the cause, and cheer for their friends and brothers and sisters. The teams had their own unique styles, each giving itself a special name. Names like the Monstars, Soup De Jour, and Green Eggs and Ham were among the more creative. During the first couple of rounds, each game lasted until either one team scored 11 points, or until 15 minutes was up. Later on, games went up to 15. The teams kept score by the honor system, and, for the most part, good sportsmanship prevailed. The winner of the tournament was Guard Up, which consisted of Nick Harrison, Christoff Forth, and Blaine Reecher. All of the teams, while competing for a good cause, were also competing for prizes. The winner would take home three $50 gift cards, and second place would take home three $25 dollar gift cards. Some, however, were not completely satisfied. “It takes $10,000 to save a child’s heart, and we’ve only raised $5,000 here today,” said Justin Neuwirt, vice president of ZBT and organizer of the event. “That’s a half-hearted effort.” Brett Berman, president of AEPi, shared Neuwirt’s concern but added that it will be a full-year campaign and that Hoops for Hearts may be only one of multiple events to reach the ultimate goal – to save a child’s heart. g

E-mail: features@ubspectrum.com

Alex McCrossen /// The Spectrum

Some professors at UB seem to spend more time in the lab than the classroom.

Balancing Act Professors’ research may take away time and energy from instructing students GRACE CLARKEStaff Writer Flyers for research being conducted at UB can be found almost everywhere. They scatter the hallways, are posted in every bathroom stall, and litter e-mail inboxes. Some professors make participating in research studies a requirement for their courses, while others expect students to conduct their own research in the classroom. Research, however, may be more important to some professors than teaching their students. As a university known for its published scholars and accredited findings, research conducted at UB often serves as an advantage to the student body, but it also tends to create a time constraint, taking professors away from their responsibilities in the classroom. In 1993, former University President William Greiner openly declared the Faculty Responsibility Policy, in which he stated: “Faculty are expected to be publishing scholars or to be otherwise actively engaged in creative activity, to make significant attempts to obtain external support for their work in fields where this is possible, to contribute effectively to the instructional programs of the University, and to participate actively in University, professional, and where appropriate, community service.” With this policy, Greiner instilled the importance of research within the university by making active research a necessity for all faculty members to uphold. Faculty members are required annually to submit a report describing in detail their professional activities and accomplishments for review by the chair and the dean, according to the policy. Many students can recall at least one class where they have blamed the difficulties of learning the subject matter on the professor’s lack of creativity or enthusiasm. “I only had one class where I felt all the professor cared about was research,” said Alynn Beyder, a senior international business and marketing major. “I didn’t really feel like he wanted to teach.” With faculty research being conducted at such a high rate, some students believe this lack of instruction comes as a result of professors’ poor prioritizing and spending more energy on meeting research requirements, and less time on teaching. “I had a teacher [who] mainly did research,” said Brandon Phillips, a junior mechanical engineering major. “Many students [in the class] felt that he made tests harder because he was research-oriented.”

Nyeri Moulterie /// The Spectrum

Fraternities Zeta Beta Tau and Alpha Epsilon Pi worked together and raised over $5,000 for the Save a Child’s Heart foundation.

ARTS & LIFE :: 4–7 DAILY DELIGHTS :: 8 CLASSIFIEDS :: 9 SPORTS :: 12–11

MON

OPINION :: 3

TUES

NEWS :: 2

WEATHER

WED

INSIDE

k k k

60%

40%

30%

H: 34 L: 26 H: 36 L: 13 H: 17 L: 8

8

Faculty research and publications have gained national attention for the university. While professors dedicate many hours of hard work into research studies, there is a question of whether students get to benefit from these research findings and requirements as well.

knowledge that professors gain during the research process is a major benefit to students. “[By] attending an R-1 school, you are learning from professors at the cutting edge of their research,” Rintamaki said. “The intention is that they will bring that knowledge into the classroom.” Individual schools and colleges within the university monitor and track their professors’ activities in research and publication. The chairs within individual departments are responsible for making sure that faculty research does not impede the professors’ ability to effectively instruct their classes. “[Research is] definitely viewed as a way for [professors] to increase their knowledge within their fields, and then we expect that they will bring this knowledge and expertise into their classes,” said Nancy Smyth, professor and dean of the School of Social Work. Within the School of Social Work, professors are able to buy out of teaching a class if they have a lot of research projects, according to Smyth. In this case, professors will use their research grant money to hire a replacement instructor, which is a way for professors to limit situations in which research could take away from their teaching responsibilities, according to Smyth. “Research is a time-soak and requires meetings and teamwork,” said Thomas Feeley, associate professor and chair of the Department of Communication. “These [research meetings] take a lot of time and are often conducted outside of Buffalo.” However, Feeley states that there is no question that his research benefits his teaching ability. “I am far more acquainted with the research process and how theories of human communication are tested empirically,” Feeley said. “Doing science firsthand provides better training and teaching to students than simply learning how others do it. The research requirements [for faculty members] are a huge advantage. [Students] learn from experts, not simply delivery persons who read what the experts write.” The opportunity to participate in research being conducted by professors and fellow students is a large perk of attending a research-based university. Although students, including Beyder, can recall negative experiences with professors who focus a majority of their time on their research, the facultyconducted research can provide opportunities to undergraduate and graduate students. “It is cool to be at a school with [research] opportunities; it provides research assistant positions to students,” Beyder said. “I don’t know of a lot of schools that allow undergraduates to participate in research.” Research also provides many instructors with useful material that they are then able to use within the classroom. According to Jennifer Wilson, a third year linguistics doctorate student and an instructor of LIN205, the research that she has conducted “is very beneficial” to the course she teaches and has provided her with “examples for teaching.” g

E-mail: news@ubspectrum.com

Lance Rintamaki, adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Communication, believes that the

NEWS FEBRUARY IS AMERICAN HEART MONTH PAGE 6

ARTS WRUB STRIVES FOR PERFECTION PAGE 5

LIFE CHINESE NEW YEAR CELEBRATION PAGE 6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.