Thursday, April 13, 2017 Volume 101 Issue 48
student printz SERVING SOUTHERN MISS SINCE 1927
www.studentprintz.com
Faculty voice concerns on Vision 2020 ‘Reorganization will require a lot of trust between people’
KAITLYN WATKINS
news editor
As of April 2017, Vision 2020 stands as the plan with which the university will rearrange departments and their faculty and staff. Faculty Senate President David Holt said the plan is set to be fully in place by fall 2019 - 2020, with the plan’s beginning stages to be implemented in fall 2017. The academic reorganization plan’s foundation is not open for change, but the Office of the Provost allowed a comment period until April 17 for feedback from individual departments. The new organization plan
Courtesy Photo |
proposes the consolidation of departments into the College of Arts and Sciences, College of Business, College of Education and Human Development and the College of Nursing and Health Professions. A central advising center will be created under the Office of the Provost. Professor of Biology Kevin Kuehn said 10 days was not enough time for the departments to get together and discuss the plan. “We now have 10 days to provide commentary back to the provost – less than two weeks,” Kuehn said at the Faculty Senate meeting held on April 7. “It’s clearly not enough time for effective departments
that are reorganizing to schools to meet and discuss [Academic Reorganization].” The Faculty Senate asked for a 30-day extension of the comment period, to which the provost agreed, according to Professor of Political Science Bob Press. Press said faculty members felt some serious questions pertaining to savings and the duties of the new positions have remained unanswered. “Declining state funding is the big challenge, but initial [admission] applications are up significantly with new recruitment efforts underway,” Press said. Department Chair of Mathematics Bernd Schroeder
said he has a positive view of the academic reorganization plan, having previously worked at Louisiana Tech University where a similar structure to the one proposed at USM is in place. “[Reorganization] will certainly require a lot of trust between people,” Schroeder said. “We need to understand each other a whole lot better than we do right now. And that is something that again so far hasn’t happened or at least hasn’t happened enough, I think. And so more communication probably is needed as we are moving into this reorganization. He gave an example of how the new departments collaborated by sharing faculty because the
structure allowed for resources to be moved around which Schroeder believes is a large part of the new reorganization. Schroeder said on one hand, you want this to be an inclusive process, but also, you want this to be an effective process. “Input was solicited through proposals. If you didn’t write a proposal and then say that you didn’t have input, well you could have written a proposal,” Shroeder said. “A lot of the things that are currently unclear need to be clarified. The big key is communication and trust.” continued on page 3