Fall 2013 - Issue 3

Page 1

a n at i o n a l pa c e m a k e r awa r d n e w s pa p e r

Volume 57, Issue 3

theswcsun.com

October 19 - November 24, 2013

Chopra pleads guilty Former superintendent fined, given community service, avoids prison

By Nickolas Furr and Lina Chankar Staff Writers

F

ormer Southwestern College Superintendent Raj K. Chopra pleaded guilty to a single misdem e a n o r i n So u t h Ba y Su p e r i o r Court and will avoid prison in the

on-going South Bay Corruption case. Chopra’s attorney Michael Attanasio pleaded guilty on Chopra’s behalf to one misdemeanor in return for the court dropping the four remaining charges he faced. Attanasio said Chopra will be fined and required to perform community service. Chopra had originally faced 13 charges — nine of them felonies — including perjury, receiving a bribe and conflict of interest. Judge Ana España met privately with Attanasio and representatives of the

San Diego County District Attorney and accepted the plea. España set April 7, 2014 as the date for Chopra’s formal sentencing. Chopra did not appear in court even though España had ordered him to earlier this month. Attanasio said Chopra would not have to make any more court appearances. Attanasio said Chopra was “looking forward to doing community service.” “Dr. Chopra is gratified to put this entire matter behind him,” please see Chopra pg. A4

Secrecy surrounds return of police chief Marshall Murphy/staff

EXITING THE STAGE — Raj Kumar Chopra will not do prison time thanks to a guilty plea to a single misdemeanor in the South Bay Corruption Case. Chopra was fined and given community service.

Unwanted in Two Lands: Deportees to refugees

Marshall Murphy/Staff

Thousands of recently deported Mexicans and Latin Americans — many of which grew up in the United States — now live in squalid refugee camps in and around the drainage canals of Tijuana. Poverty, hunger, crime and dispair grip a swelling colony of people rejected by two nations. Special Section Pages C1-C4

By Lina Chankar Staff Writer

C

ampus Police Chief Michael Cash was reinstated to his position by the college following a pair of investigations of an Aug. 23 incident where a handgun he was holding in police headquarters fired at head level and narrowly missed three employees in an adjacent room. A preliminary investigation conducted by SWCPD Sgt. Robert Sanchez concluded that Cash was negligent and that the discharge of his district issue Glock handgun was not accidental. A subsequent investigation conducted by a retired San Diego Harbor Police chief called the gunshot an accident and recommended that Cash be reinstated. SWC president Dr. Melinda Nish announced in an Oct. 30 campus email that she was reinstating Cash. “We are pleased to have Chief Cash returning to work today,” Nish wrote. “The district fully supports the return of Chief Cash as the head of the police department.” Scores of campus employees and many students said they did not support the return of Cash. Many expressed surprise and “shock” at the decision to reinstate Cash and to allow him to carry a loaded weapon. Professor of Anthropology Dr. Mark Van Stone said the episode “doesn’t make any sense.” “The story demands details, I want more details,” he said. “Why are the details a secret?” Professor of Philosophy Alejandro Orozco agreed. “Our administration is not being clear and forthcoming, and that is creating anxiety on the campus,” he said. “Our employees and the public need an explanation.” Nish and other campus leaders refused to provide any information about the shooting and the chain of events that multiple eyewitnesses have called “bizarre,” “frightening” and “a very serious situation.” Some employees said they were ordered not to discuss the situation and were compelled to sign non-disclosure agreements. Public Information Officer Lillian Leopold acknowledged that was true. Though neither the college nor investigator Betty P. Kelepecz will release any information about what happened the morning of the gunfire, several eyewitnesses have recounted virtually the same version of events. Only one of the employees, carpenter Billy Brooks, was willing to speak on the please see Cash pg. A4

Sections open Voters will decide how transparent their government will be for waitlisted SWC students By Richard O’Rourke Staff Writer

By Daphne Jauregui Arts Editor

Being on the waitlist is no longer a war of attrition for students trying to hang on as new sections gradually open. High demand classes with full waitlists are being cloned in order to accommodate more students and their needs. Cloning courses would allow students to keep the same time frame for which they enrolled. please see Waitlist pg. A4

America’s strongest transparency law, the California Public Records Act, is the envy of states across the country and nations around the world. Some lawmakers in the Golden State, however, were ready to gut CPRA to save some money. Their move caused an uproar and other elected officials are pushing back in an effort to protect CPRA in perpetuity. Senate Constitutional Amendment Three (SCA-3) is a response to Assembly Bill 76 and Senate Bill 71, legislation with the stated purpose of saving money for the

Inside:

state and local governments. When a local government or government agency incurs a cost due to compliance with CPRA, the state government has to reimburse it. AB 76 and SB 71 proposed halting reimbursements to local governments. If reimbursements were to stop, then CPRA would cease to be mandatory and would be reduced to a set of “encouraged practices.” Opponents of the measures said the savings would be pennywise but pound foolish. While local agencies could save thousands, taxpayers stood to lose hundreds of millions if CPRA was gutted, according to

College’s secrecy about Michael Cash’s reinstatement is troubling. Viewpoints, A5

watchdog, news media and taxpayer advocacy organizations. Transparency, they agree, would all but vanish, and secretive government could resume pre-CPRA practices of backroom deals and no accountability. When the CPRA was enacted in 1968 it brought a presumption of access to public information, meaning citizens do not have to justify their requests or provide reasons for wanting the information. Requested information must be released within a reasonable time period, usually 10 days. If the government agency decides that it is not in the public’s best interest to release the information, legal sources

Dance concert is often-brilliant, sometimes bumpy, always fun. Arts, B4

and exemptions must be cited to justify the restraint of information. SCA-3 would remove the requirement that the state reimburse local governments for complying with the CPRA, while requiring local governments to obey the law. Lillian Leopold, chief public information officer at Southwestern College, said there were a lot of CPRA requests during the grand jury investigations of former college administrators and governing board members, but it does not happen as often anymore. Persons requesting information have to pay reproduction

Undefeated soccer team repeats as league champs. Sports, B7

please see CPRA pg. A4

SWC students who live in Mexico face daunting journey every morning. Campus, B1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Fall 2013 - Issue 3 by Southwestern College Sun Newspaper - Issuu