Page 2
Page 3
Page 5
Page 7
Campus Quotes
Rock the Block
Government
Football
Do you believe in creation or evolution?
Annual fundraiser to support Make a Wish.
Defense secretary Robert Gates said the military’s repeal of “Don’t ask, don’t tell” could have “enormous consequences.”
What’s next for the football team?
OCT. 14, 2010 uco360.com twitter.com/uco360
THE VISTA
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA’S student voice since 1903.
Origins
By Christie Southern / Contributing Writer
cation and belief in Darwin’s theory, ranging from 21 percent of those with high school educations or less to 74 percent for those with postgraduate degrees. However, evolution and creation is not always black and white. The new “gray area” gaining popularity is the idea of Intelligent Design, that is, a person who can believe in evolution and still believe God created humans and guided their development. “It’s a much more sophisticated version of Creationism,” Sneed said. It’s a belief in “supernatural selection.” “God does what can’t be explained,” Sneed said. This modern formulation of the idea was developed by a group of American creationists who revised their argument in the creation– evolution controversy to circumvent court rulings that prohibit the teaching of creationism as science in schools. Bayes’ Theorem, named for Thomas Bayes, is used by those who believe in Intelligent Design to further their argument. Through Bayes’ Theorem, Intelligent Design believers suggest that all the perfectly calculated astronomical coincidences of the Earth could not have exactly as we know it again without an unknown outside influence. “So many of these astronomical coincidences … have to be just so, and the order of things have to be just so,” Sneed said. “The probability of these occurring exactly the same way again is zero. When a God is thrown into the equation, the probability becomes one.” Despite, the more scientific approach to intelligent design, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences stated “creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.” Sneed, who has a background in Physics and Religions, explained how at one point it was believed the sun revolved around the Earth. “That made sense then,” Sneed said. “We can make perfectly valid observations [about the world] and still make wrong claims about where it came from.”
T
he theories of evolution and creationism have been brought up in court for the past 70 years. The debate over teaching creationism or evolution as scientific theory dates back to the 1925 trial of John T. Scopes, who was convicted of teaching evolution in a Dayton, Tenn., high school. Scopes was accused of violating the 1925 Butler Act, which made it unlawful to “teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible.” The Tennessee Supreme Court dismissed his conviction on appeal, and the law was repealed in 1967. The debate raises many questions about the origins of our nature. According to the website allaboutphilosophy.org, creation “denotes the existence of a divine Creator who has exercised his creative abilities, creating this world and the life-forms we see” whereas evolution stresses “the naturalistic (random, undirected) descent of all living creatures from a common ancestor who originally evolved from inorganic matter. Life is the product of random chance.” Creation describes expansion. It is a broad claim about the creation of everything from human beings to the sun in the sky whereas evolution focuses on the development of life alone. “It’s a limited theory about complex forms of life,” Richard Sneed, philosophy professor said. “A belief in a God, or something like a God, is part of the human experience,” Sneed said. “No society has developed without one. People find it of great comfort and I respect that.” In terms of the argument itself, both sides have become polarized, he said. “They do not listen to each other. They yell and use sound bytes and bumper stickers.” According to Gallup Polls taking during February 2009: Younger Americans are more likely to believe in evolution. At the same time, of those (age 18-34) only 49 percent say they believe in evolution. Only 39 percent of Americans say they “believe in the theory of evolution,” while a quarter say they do not believe in the theory, and another 36 percent do not have an opinion either way. There is a strong relationship between edu-
A R T W O R K B Y B O M B S A W AYA R T . C O M
DEBATE ON ORIGIN OF LIFE
Geology
WEATHER TODAY
H 77° L 50°
Do you personally believe in the theory of evolution, do you not believe in evolution, or don’t you have an opinion either way?
39%
36%
25%
Believe in evolution Do not believe in evolution
TOMORROW H 83° L 53°
No opinion either way
1%
No answer
Belief in Theory of Evolution, by Age % Yes, believe in evolution
% No, do not believe in evolution
% No opinion either way
49
39
33 18
More weather at www.uco360.com
DID YOU KNOW? The right lung takes in more air than the left one does.
18 to 34
37
24 35 to 54
31 30
38
55 and older
Belief in Evolution, by Education Level % Yes, believe in evolution
% No, do not believe in evolution
% No opinion either way
21 27
52
High School or less
41
29 30
Some college
53
74
22 26
College graduate
11 16 Post graduate
EARTHQUAKE NEAR OKC By Cody Bromley / Staff Writer Wednesday morning, central Oklahoma was shaken by a 5.1 magnitude earthquake. The U.S. Geological Survey reports that the moderate class quake occurred at 9:06 a.m. at Lake Thunderbird State Park, 40 miles south of UCO, but only nine miles from Norman. “It seems to be the buzz on campus today,” Michael Hendricks, a senior interpersonal communications major, said. Hendricks said that he his classmates felt the quake during class Wednesday morning. “We just thought it was construction,” he said. Hendricks said his professor dismissed the vibratory interruption, telling the students that earthquakes do not occur in Oklahoma. “We just continued on with the lesson, then I got four text messages saying, ‘Did you feel the earthquake?’” Later, Hendricks went to the Nigh University Center later and saw on one of the TV’s what meteorologists were still calling a 4.3 magnitude quake. He said he was surprised to see that it really was an earthquake. “My first earthquake. Woo-hoo,” he said. Norman residents reported definite feelings of the earthquake, including damages, and two injuries. One resident reporting feeling
the quake was University of Oklahoma junior James Wray. “I was just lying in bed working on my paper and my whole apartment started shaking,” Wray said. While the intensity of the quake near Wray was higher than what Edmond residents felt, Wray said he did not feel he was in any imminent danger but he was slightly startled. “If I were up in Tulsa, it might have been a little shiver, but here… definitely noticeable,” he said. The 5.1 earthquake is not the only earthquake to hit Oklahoma in recent months, but it is the largest. Two and a half weeks ago, a 3.3 magnitude was reported by the USGS in southern Oklahoma. Early September geologists recorded six earthquakes ranging between 1.8 and 3.1 in magnitude in central Oklahoma. The magnitude of an earthquake is measured on the Richter scale, named after seismologist Charles F. Richter. The magnitude is calculated from the largest seismic wave recorded from the earthquake. The scale is based on a base-10 logarithmic scale. On the Richter scale, a magnitude five earthquake is ten times as intense as a magni-
Continued on page 3