Fairfield County Business Journal 051319

Page 1

MAY 13, 2019 VOL. 55, No. 19

westfaironline.com

From left: Len Fasano and Gov. Ned Lamont

INSIDE PAGE

4

TOY STORY

PAGE

13

STAMFORD PROTEST

Conflict in Connecticut LAMONT, DEMS AT ODDS OVER SOME BUDGET ITEMS; GOP QUESTIONS GOV’S FORTITUDE

BY KEVIN ZIMMERMAN kzimmerman@westfairinc.com

A

s negotiations over the state budget continue, Gov. Ned Lamont is apparently facing some opposition not just from Republicans but also from fellow Democrats. The Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee has approved a $1.3 billion revenue increase, funded in part by a two-percentage-point increase on capital gains earnings — from 6.99% to 8.99% — for individuals whose total earnings from all sources exceed $500,000 ($1 million for couples), something Democrats said could raise $262 million a year but that Lamont has opposed.

The committee’s plan would also maintain the hospital tax, which will bring in an estimated $516 million that was previously scheduled to decrease. The state’s hospitals have been vocal about their opposition to the tax and expressed hope following Lamont’s election that a compromise could be worked out. The committee’s plan also seeks to supersede the governor’s proposed 1.5-cent-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened drinks with a 1 cent sales tax increase for restaurant food and prepared meals. The committee also favors establishing a 6.35% tax on retail recreational marijuana sales, with an additional 3% local tax that could be imposed in juris-

dictions that allow cannabis businesses to operate. Marijuana transfers from growers would also be taxed at $35 per ounce. Lamont has said he favors legalizing recreational marijuana as a means of raising revenue. The Finance Committee also approved a 10-cent charge for plastic bags, which would raise $29 million to $32 million, something that Lamont has also supported. The committee’s budget would also commit a larger portion of the motor vehicle sales tax to the state’s Special Transportation Fund than Lamont has proposed. “This budget contains much more than a tax on the wealthy,” Senate Republican President Pro Tempore » CONNECTICUT

6

HOW TO PROVE YOU’RE NOT HIRED, FIRED OR FORCED TO RETIRE BECAUSE OF YOUR AGE BY JONATHAN PERKINS Contributing Writer

I

f you are over 40 years old, age discrimination at work may start with teasing comments from co-workers like, “Must be nice to be so close to retirement,” but it’s no joke when you lose a job on the basis of your age, not your ability. However, proving that you were a victim of age discrimination in the workplace has become increasingly difficult. Age discrimination is illegal at any stage of employment, including during hiring, promotions, raises and layoffs. The law also prohibits workplace harassment because of age by co-workers, supervisors or clients.

These protections fall under The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) that promotes employment of older persons (over age 40) based on their ability rather than age and prohibits arbitrary age discrimination in employment. The ADEA applies to employers that have at least 20 employees. Also prohibited are mandatory retirement ages with a few exemptions, such as airline pilots and public safety workers. But the 2009 Supreme Court case, Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., raised the bar for proving age discrimination. Instead of merely showing that age was a contributing factor in an employer’s decision to fire, demote or refuse » DISCRIMINATION

6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.