2 | LET IT SNOW JANUARY 23, 2017 | VOL. 53, No. 4
YOUR ONLY SOURCE FOR REGIONAL BUSINESS NEWS
10 | FILL'ER UP westfaironline.com
INDIAN POINT LEFT IN THE DARK? BY RYAN DEFFENBAUGH rdeffenbaugh@westfairinc.com
W
hen Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo announced earlier this month the agreement to shut down Indian Point Energy Center by 2021, he won a fight he has been waging for years. But while Cuomo said he saved the region from a “ticking time bomb,” the nuclear plant’s closing leaves a major gap in the state’s power production that needs to be filled. Cuomo has long opposed the nuclear plant, calling it unsafe to have it within 30 miles of New York City. His administration had filed several legal challenges to
the relicensing of Indian Point’s two reactors. Still, the plant’s operators, Entergy Corp., said the closure has much more to do with low energy prices biting into revenues than Cuomo’s opposition. Regardless of what really drove the plant to close, the state and utilities now have four years to figure out how to refill the 2,000 megawatts of electricity the Buchanan plant produces. Cuomo in his announcement of the deal said the state already has more than 700 megawatts ready to go in transmission upgrades and efficiency measures. Beyond that, he pointed to 1,000 megawatts ready to come online by 2021, including renewable power.
Officials with Entergy have some doubt that the region can withstand the loss of the plant’s output, which contributes about 25 percent of Westchester and New York City’s power. “I think that remains to be seen,” said Bill Mohl, president of Entergy Wholesale Commodities, at a press conference announcing the plant’s closing. “Obviously
they need this plant for reliability ... so it will be up to the state to come up with plans to replace this capacity in a timely matter.” In its 2016 Reliability Needs Assessment, the New York Independent System Operator said there would be impacts on reliability if Indian Point were to deactivate in 2017. Still, the plant will not close
immediately. A spokesperson with NYISO said that once it receives a retirement notice from Entergy, it will start a new review examining how the closing could impact reliability. There’s also the question of what types of energy will be used as a replacement. The plant’s closing comes at a time » INDIAN POINT, page 6
Will plant closing make real estate radioactive? BY ALEESIA FORNI aforni@westfairinc.com WHEN LAURA HOLDGRAFER AND HER HUSBAND, DOUG, began searching for their first home in 2014, they set their sights on Westchester County because of its proximity to her work in New York City. But after months of searching, the couple was forced to expand their search farther away from Laura’s family home on Long Island.
“We quickly realized that as mid-20-year-old professionals, we could only afford northern Westchester,” Laura Holdgrafer said. Attractive housing prices and lower taxes led the couple to buy their forever home on a quiet street in Peekskill, one that just happened to be only three miles from nuclear power plant Indian Point. Holdgrafer said that while she and her husband were con-
cerned with some safety issues in regard to the plant, the deal she secured for her three-bedroom dream home with a large, fencedin backyard was ultimately too good to pass up. “My family wasn’t thrilled with our proximity to the plant, but my husband and I were able to rationalize,” she said. “If something was to go wrong with the plant, we thought it would likely affect all of New York state and not just northern Westchester.” The Holdgrafers were not alone in their thinking. J. Philip Faranda, broker and owner of J. Philip Real Estate in Briarcliff Manor, said that for decades, he has seen prospective buyers shun homes in the towns and villages surrounding Indian Point,
A home on the market in Montrose. Photo by Aleesia Forni.
including Peekskill, Montrose, Verplanck and Buchanan. “There’s a peculiar disparity between northeastern Westchester and northwestern Westchester, and I think the only
difference is that there’s nuclear fission and radiation there,” Faranda said. “Because its bucolic, it’s waterfront, it’s all that. Why isn’t Verplanck the Hamptons?” » REAL ESTATE, page 6