Ph: (03) 443 8000 Fax: (03) 443 8024 41 Helwick Street, PO Box 45, Wanaka
Thur 27.09.12 - wed 03.10.12
everyone reads the wanaka sun
free
Tidying thetown
4
weeks to go... inside:
Stoptober to stop smoking page 2 Pictured from left: Scarlett Norman, Jem Curtis, Quinn Curtis and Estelle Norman picked up rubbish on Alison Avenue in Albert Town for Keep New Zealand Beautiful. See story page 7.
PHOTO: supplied
A rural education page 9
sunviews page 13
Junior snow champs page 16
rental listings
sunclassifieds
page 15
Water proposal debated Caroline Harker Although farmers, greenies and the council generally agree our district should maintain and/or improve the remarkable quality of its water, they have plenty of objections to the ORC proposed plan change (6A) on how this should be done. The plan change includes specified limits on the amount of contaminants which can be discharged into rural waterways from runoff, leaching and drains. More than 400 submissions were received throughout Otago and commissioner Clive Geddes and ORC councillors Duncan Butcher and David Shepherd spent two days hearing people speak to their submissions in Wanaka this week. Mount Aspiring Station owner Randall Aspinall told
the panel how his farm would apparently leach five kilograms of nitrogen per hectare per year (5/kg/N/ha/yr) more than it would be allowed to under the proposed change, even though no nitrogenous fertiliser has been applied to his property for 25 years.
out of people like myself when I had, and have, no control over the cause.” Isabella was referring to the post-mining landscape of the Cardrona Valley which washes clay and sediment into waterways when it rains. Isabella, and several others, said if there had to
farming if the overall quality of water coming off his farm started to deteriorate. “The panel accepts farmers know their land better than anyone and therefore the solutions should be with you,” he said. QLDC senior policy analyst
Arbitrary and ill-informed targets will make criminals out of people like myself when I had, and have, no control over the cause. (Under the plan change most areas in the Upper Clutha would be allowed to leach 10kg/N/ha/yr). Randall said more research was required before limits were set. Isabella Anderson of Branch Creek Station’s (Cardrona) also objected to the limits saying “arbitrary and ill-informed targets will make criminals
be regulations they should be catchment based (rather than one-size-fits-all). Another Cardrona farmer Tim Scurr objected to a perceived need to fence waterways. “The fences would only last until the first flood” he said. Commissioner Clive Geddes told Tim he would only need to change the way he was
Jonathan Richards said the council objects to allowing landowners to do “whatever they like” until their water is found to be polluted. “The intentions of the plan are good but the method of delivery is wrong,” he said. “Our submission recommends a greater degree of consenting requirements. Also, in the
proposal’s current form it is unclear how they will be able to do all the monitoring and enforcement that would be required.” An area which had agreement from all sides at the hearings was that the final plan change needs to be very clear, as in its current form everyone is grappling to understand it. “Once you come out the other side of all these hearings and submissions I would support the council producing a farmer friendly booklet on Plan Change 6A,” Glen Dene farmer Richard Burdon told the panel. “Water is owned by the community,” he said. “In my opinion most farmers understand this about water and have no intention to harm it while it travels through their property. Story continues page 3...