2011%20Member%20Survey%20Results%20final

Page 1

2011 Membership Survey Results

1


Study Methodology • An online survey was conducted in late June/ early July of LSCU affiliated credit unions. • 98 surveys out of a possible 234 were completed, representing a 42% response rate as compared to 38% response rate in 2010. • The data was processed and analyzed with this report summarizing key findings.

2


Respondents 2010 vs. 2011 2010 State

$35M

$35 $100M

$100 $250M

$250M Plus

40-Alabama

14

7

10

9

49-Florida

15

7

9

17

2011 State

$35M

$35 $100M

$100 $250M

$250M Plus

42-Alabama

17

7

10

8

56-Florida

19

10

10

17

3


# of CUs in Each Chapter

Respondents Each Chapter

%

Birmingham Broward

24 9

12 4

50 44

Central Florida Cheaha Gulf Coast Mobile Montgomery Muscle Shoals North Central (FL) Northeast (AL)

20 10 9 17 14 7 9 7

11 6 2 8 6 2 3 5

55 60 23 47 43 28 33 72

Northeast Florida

18

6

33

Northwest Florida Palm Beach Pinellas Sara‐Mana Southernmost Tallahassee Tampa Tuscaloosa Wiregrass

6 7 6 5 16 16 13 8 8

4 2 2 2 5 7 7 2 2

66 28 33 40 31 44 54 25 25

LSCU Chapter

Survey Respondents by State & Chapter

Alabama 43%

Florida 57%

4


Asset Range of Respondents 37% 33% 30% 26%

16%

< $35 million

17%

$35 to $100 million

2010 2011

22% 20%

$100 to $250 million

$250 million+

5


Membership Size of Respondents 37% 41%

25% 18%

2010 2011

20% 19%

18%

< 2,000 members

22%

2,000 to 15,000

15,000 to 40,000

40,000+

6


Change in Satisfaction Q: How has your level of satisfaction with the LSCU changed over the past 12 months, if at all? 61%

44%

92% of credit unions surveyed said their satisfaction with the league increased or stayed the same as compared to 88% in 2010.

44%

2010 2011

31%

10% 4% Improved services to credit unions

Stayed the same

Decreased services to credit unions

2%

4%

Do not know

7


Change in Satisfaction by Asset Size Q: How has your level of satisfaction with the LSCU changed over the past 12 months, if at all? 2010

82%

2011

2010

93%

2011

94%

81%

2010

2010

85%

2011

96%

2011

100%

100% 72%

65% 58% 47% 47% 35% 28% 23% 8% 11%

< $35 million

6% 0%

$35 to $100 million Increased

Stayed about the same

0%

0%

$100 to $250 million Decreased

Don't Know

0%

0%

> $250 Million


Change in Satisfaction by State Q: How has your level of satisfaction with LSCU changed over the past 12 months, if at all? 62%

86% AL

61%

Satisfaction increased or stayed same

35% 24%

7%

Increased

Stayed about the same

Alabama

96% FL

7% 2%

2%

Decreased

Don't Know

Florida


Association Services Governmental Affairs

10


Governmental Affairs Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding Governmental Affairs issues: Total Strongly Agree Agree

Agree

Strongly Disagree Disagree

2010 Total Agree

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues at the State Capitol.

94%

37%

57%

3%

0%

92%

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues to federal lawmakers.

95%

34%

61%

2%

0%

89%

LSCU keeps CUs well informed on legislative and regulatory issues of importance.

96%

53%

43%

1%

0%

94%

LSCU grassroots advocacy events are important.

93%

48%

45%

7%

0%

88%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed Total agree = Strongly Agree + Agree

11


Governmental Affairs by Asset Size Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding governmental affairs issues: < $35 Million

$35 - $100 Million

$100 $250 Million

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues at the State Capitol.

100%

100%

95%

92%

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues to federal lawmakers.

100%

100%

100%

96%

LSCU keeps CUs well informed on legislative and regulatory issues of importance.

97%

100%

100%

100%

LSCU grassroots advocacy events are important.

97%

94%

95%

96%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

> $250 Million

12


Governmental Affairs by State Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding Governmental Affairs issues: Alabama

Florida

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues at the State Capitol.

95%

98%

The LSCU does an effective job advocating CU issues to federal lawmakers.

98%

95%

LSCU keeps CUs well informed on legislative and regulatory issues of importance to the movement.

98%

100%

LSCU grassroots advocacy events are important.

93%

98%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

13


Regulatory & Compliance Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding regulatory/compliance issues: 2010Total Strongly Strongly Total Agree Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Agree

I feel League InfoSight is an important tool for my CU.

Regulatory Affairs is helpful in answering my compliance and/or operational questions.

88%

27%

61%

11%

1%

72%

93%

32%

61%

7%

0%

73%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed Total agree = Strongly Agree + Agree 14


Regulatory & Compliance by Asset Size Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding regulatory/compliance issues: < $35 $35 - $100 Million Million

$100 $250 Million

> $250 Million

I feel League InfoSight is an important tool for my CU.

94%

88%

95%

72%

Regulatory Affairs is helpful in answering my compliance and/or operational questions.

97%

100%

95%

80%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported. 15


Regulatory & Compliance by State Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding regulatory/compliance issues: 2010

2011

Alabama Florida Alabama Florida

I feel League InfoSight is an important tool for my CU.

Regulatory Affairs is helpful in answering my compliance and/or operational questions.

69%

73%

93%

84%

63%

82%

93%

93%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported. 16


Association Services Education

17


Education & Training Q: Do you feel the LSCU education offerings meet the training needs of your credit union staff?

71%

18% Strongly Agree

Agree

89% of credit unions surveyed agreed LSCU education offerings are meeting their training needs as compared to 71% in 2010

11%

0%

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

18


Education by Asset Size Q: Do you feel the LSCU education offerings meet the training needs of your credit union and its staff? 2010

75%

2011

2010

79%

2011

88%

97%

2010

74%

2011

95%

2010

2011

62%

72%

85% 76% 68% 61%

36% 28% 12%

12%

10%

3%

< $35 million

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

5%

$100 to $250 million Disagree

Strongly Disagree

4%

> $250 Million


Education By State Q: Do you feel the LSCU education offerings meet the training needs of your credit union staff? 2011 90% AL

2011 88% FL

2010 77% AL

71%

19%

2010 75% FL

70%

18%

10% Alabama

Strongly Agree

12% Florida

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree


Source of Training Please indicate which of the following sources provide training to your CEO, Staff or Volunteers: LSCU was identified as a source for training for CEOs, staff and volunteers on a higher percentage basis. CEO

Staff

Volunteers

LSCU

33%

35%

32%

CUNA

28%

30%

24%

NAFCU

9%

7%

8%

CUES

19%

13%

12%

NASCUS

1%

1%

2%

Other

10%

13%

12%

21


Association Services Communications

22


Communication Channels Q: Please indicate the value to your credit union for the following LSCU member communication channels:

Total Extremely Agree Valuable Valuable Neutral LSCU Website 68% eSignal (Weekly electronic 74% newsletter) Signal Magazine 55% (Quarterly magazine) Multimedia (Audio/video, 54% podcasts)

Little Value

No Value

2010 Total Agree

26%

42%

29%

2%

1%

72%

24%

50%

24%

1%

1%

78%

8%

47%

31%

12%

1%

57%

13%

41%

35%

10%

1%

43%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed Total agree = Extremely Valuable + Valuable 23


Communications by Asset Size Q: Please indicate the value to your credit union for the following LSCU member communication channels: < $35 Million

$35 to $100 $100 to $250 Million Million

> $250 Million

LSCU Website

81%

65%

65%

56%

eSignal Weekly

72%

76%

80%

72%

Signal Magazine

61%

65%

55%

40%

Multimedia

64%

47%

40%

56%

Note: Only Extremely Valuable and Valuable responses are being reported. 24


Communication Channels by State Q: Please indicate the value to your credit union for the following LSCU member communication channels: Alabama

Florida

2011

2010

2011

2010

LSCU Website

76%

65%

63%

78%

eSignal Weekly

74%

80%

75%

74%

Signal Magazine

52%

55%

57%

58%

Multimedia

57%

43%

52%

44%

Note: Only Extremely Valuable and Valuable responses are being reported. 25


Member Communications Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Total Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

The LSCU keeps CUs well informed on important issues.

100%

48%

52%

0

0

94%

The LSCU website is a useful tool for industry news and information.

95%

26%

69%

5%

0%

74%

The statewide cooperative brand advertising is something CUs should support financially.

80%

36%

44%

17%

3%

63%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Agree = Strongly Agree + Agree.

Strongly Disagree Disagree

2010 Total Agree

26


Communications by Asset Size Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: < $35 Million

$35 to $100 $100 to Million $250 Million

> $250 Million

The LSCU keeps CUs well informed on important issues.

100%

100%

100%

100%

The LSCU website is a useful tool for industry news and information.

97%

100%

95%

88%

81%

76%

80%

80%

The statewide cooperative brand advertising is something CUs should support financially.

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

27


Communications by State Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: Alabama

Florida

The LSCU keeps CUs well informed on important issues.

100%

100%

The LSCU website is a useful tool for industry news and information.

95%

95%

100%

75%

The statewide cooperative brand advertising is something CUs should support financially.

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

28


Communications Q: How do you perceive the level of communications from the LSCU? 81%

9%

Just Right

Too Much

5%

Not Enough

5% Don't Know

29


Member Care Attributes


Member Care Attributes Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding LSCU services:

Total Strongly Agree Agree

Strongly Agree Disagree Disagree

2010 Total Agree

LSCU understands CU needs.

93%

39%

54%

7%

0%

88%

LSCU staff is responsive.

97%

48%

49%

2%

1%

89%

LSCU staff is professional.

98%

54%

44%

2%

0%

96%

LSCU staff is knowledgeable. LSCU staff communicates League priorities.

98%

52%

46%

2%

0%

93%

95%

39%

56%

5%

0%

82%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Agree = Strongly Agree + Agree.

31


Member Care Attributes by Asset Size Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding LSCU services: < $35 $35 to $100 $100 to $250 Million Million Million

> $250 Million

LSCU understands CU needs.

92%

94%

95%

92%

LSCU staff is responsive.

92%

100%

100%

100%

LSCU staff is professional.

97%

100%

100%

96%

LSCU staff is knowledgeable. LSCU staff communicates League priorities.

97%

94%

100%

100%

94%

94%

95%

95%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

32


Member Care Attributes by State Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding LSCU services:

LSCU understands CU needs. LSCU staff is responsive. LSCU staff is professional. LSCU staff is knowledgeable. LSCU staff communicates League priorities.

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

2010 Alabama 83% 85% 98% 98%

Florida 92% 92% 96% 92%

75%

88%

2011 Alabama 91% 95% 98% 95% 95%

Florida 95% 98% 99% 100% 95%

33


Member Care Attributes Q: Please rate each of the LSCU services in terms of importance to your decision to affiliate with the LSCU: Total Very Important Important

Important

Moderately Of Little 2010 Total Important Importance Important

Governmental Affairs (Lobbying, grassroots advocacy, PAC fundraising)

90%

61%

29%

6%

4%

92%

89%

61%

28%

9%

2%

84%

84%

43%

41%

13%

3%

71%

82%

25%

57%

15%

3%

77%

59%

24%

35%

37%

4%

66%

Regulatory Affairs (InfoSight, compliance helpline, Comment calls/letters, Customized CU performance reports & Compliance training) Education & Training (Annual Convention & Exposition, Development Conference, webinars)

Communications (Publications, website, Media outreach, Statewide Image Campaign)

Cooperative Initiatives (SAS CU Development & Support, Chapter Support, Foundations)

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Important = Very important + Important.

34


Member Care Attributes by Asset Size Q: Please rate each of the LSCU services in terms of importance to your decision to affiliate with the LSCU: 2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

< $35 Million

<35 Million

$100 to $250 Million

$100 to $250 Million

> $250 Million

> $250 Million

Governmental Affairs

86%

83%

92%

82%

95%

100%

100%

96%

Regulatory Affairs

97%

100%

83%

82%

79%

100%

76%

68%

Education & Training

90%

94%

67%

82%

78%

85%

46%

68%

Communications

83%

92%

75%

65%

68%

85%

77%

76%

Cooperative Initiatives

82%

89%

62%

41%

67%

45%

54%

41%

Note: Only Very Important and Important responses are being reported.

2010

2011

$35 to $100 $35 to $100 Million Million

35


Member Care Attributes by State Q: Please rate each of the LSCU services in terms of importance to your decision to affiliate with the LSCU: 2010 Alabama

Florida

2011 Alabama

Florida

Governmental Affairs (Lobbying, grassroots advocacy, PAC fundraising)

93%

96%

93%

88%

75%

93%

88%

89%

65%

76%

86%

82%

75%

78%

83%

80%

63%

71%

60%

59%

Regulatory Affairs (InfoSight, Compliance helpline, Comment calls/letters, Customized CU performance reports & Compliance training)

Education & Training (Annual Convention & Exposition, Development Conference, webinars)

Communications (Publications, website, Media outreach, Statewide Image Campaign)

Cooperative Initiatives (SAS CU Development & Support, Chapter Support, Foundations)

Note: Only Very Important and Important responses are being reported.

36


League Consolidation Q: I feel the value and promises of consolidation of the Alabama and Florida Leagues are being realized.

62%

In 2011, 89% agree that the consolidated LSCU is on the right track as compared to 69% agree in 2010.

27%

Strongly Agree

Agree

11%

0%

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

37


Member Care Attributes by Asset Size Q: I feel the value and promises of consolidation of the Alabama and Florida Leagues are being realized. 2011 86%

61%

2010 59%

2011 83%

65% 2010 93%

2011 90%

65%

2010 74%

2011 96%

60%

2010 66%

36% 25%

25% 18% 14%

17% 10% 4%

< $35 million

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

$100 to $250 million Disagree

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree


Member Care Attributes by State Q: I feel the value and promises of consolidation of the Alabama and Florida Leagues are being realized. 2011 90% of AL CUs Agree

2010 60% of AL CUs Agree

71%

19%

2011 88% of FL CUs Agree

2010 77% of FL CUs Agree

70%

18% 12%

10%

Alabama Strongly Agree

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree


Value of Affiliation Q: Please indicate your general satisfaction level with the services and value provided by the following system partners that you have used in the last 12 months. Total Strongly Agree Agree

Strongly 2010 Agree Disagree Disagree Total Agree

My CU receives a good value for its LSCU dues investment.

92%

28%

64%

7%

1%

77%

My CU receives a good value for its CUNA dues investment.

84%

15%

69%

13%

2%

73%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Agree = Strongly Agree + Agree.

40


Value of Affiliation Q: Please indicate your general satisfaction level with the services and value provided by the following system partners that you have used in the last 12 months. 2011 < $35 Million

$35 to $100 $100 to $250 Million Million

> $250 Million

My CU receives a good value for its LSCU dues.

89%

94%

95%

92%

My CU receives a good value for its CUNA dues.

92%

82%

85%

76%

2010 My CU receives a good value for its LSCU dues.

72%

86%

79%

76%

My CU receives a good value for its CUNA dues.

62%

71%

77%

87%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

41


Value of Affiliation Q: Please indicate your general satisfaction level with the services and value provided by the following system partners that you have used in the last 12 months. 2010

2011

Alabama

Florida

Alabama

Florida

My CU receives a good value for its LSCU dues investment.

75%

79%

88%

95%

My CU receives a good value for its CUNA dues investment.

75%

71%

90%

80%

Note: Only Strongly Agree and Agree responses are being reported.

42


League Service Corporation

43


LEVERAGE Awareness & Usage Q: When considering a new product or service is LEVERAGE one of the partners you review?

No 27%

Yes 73%

44


LEVERAGE Awareness & Usage Q: LEVERAGE solutions provide value to my credit union. 2011 86%

2010 80% 62%

24% 12% 1%

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Only Strongly agree and agree response percentages included in the bubbles 45


LEVERAGE Awareness & Usage Q: LEVERAGE solutions provide value to my credit union.

75% 64%

61%

47% 41% 28% 20% 11%

20% 12%

12% 0%

< $35 million

0%

5%

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

0%

$100 to $250 million

Disagree

4%

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree

46


LEVERAGE Awareness & Usage Q: LEVERAGE solutions provide value to my credit union. 2011 93%

2010 77%

2011 82%

2010 76%

69% 57%

18%

25%

24% 5%

2%

0%

Alabama Strongly Agree

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Only Strongly agree and agree response percentages included in the bubbles 47


LEVERAGE Products Q: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: LEVERAGE is responsive

LEVERAGE is a trusted business partner

LEVERAGE is innovative

LEVERAGE has best-in-class products & services

67%

65% 64% 60%

27% 29%

24% 18%

16% 11%

Strongly Agree

6%

Agree

11%

Disagree

0%

0%

0%

0%

Strongly Disagree

48


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is responsive.

76%

75%

61%

59%

41% 28%

25% 16% 11%

0%

< $35 million

0%

0%

0%

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

0%

$100 to $250 million

Disagree

8%

0%

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree

49


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is responsive.

71% 64%

29% 24%

5%

0%

7%

Alabama Strongly Agree

0%

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

50


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is a trusted business partner.

65% 61%

60% 53% 41%

31% 25% 20% 8%

6%

0%

< $35 million

10%

0%

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

0%

$100 to $250 million

Disagree

20%

0%

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree

51


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is a trusted business partner.

67%

30% 26% 20% 14% 7%

0%

0%

Alabama Strongly Agree

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

52


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is innovative.

72% 65%

64% 55%

20%

19% 8%

28%

25%

24% 12% 0%

< $35 million

0%

0%

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

$100 to $250 million

Disagree

8%

0%

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree

53


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE is innovative.

74%

59%

21% 14%

12%

0%

0%

Alabama Strongly Agree

20%

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

54


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE has best-in-class products & services.

71%

69%

65% 52% 40%

25% 14%

18%

17% 12% 0%

< $35 million

10%

0%

$35 to $100 million Strongly Agree

Agree

0%

$100 to $250 million

Disagree

8%

0%

> $250 Million

Strongly Disagree

55


LEVERAGE Products Q: LEVERAGE has best-in-class products & services.

69% 61%

27% 21% 13%

10%

0%

0%

Alabama Strongly Agree

Florida Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

56


LEVERAGE Products and Services Q: Please rate your credit union’s awareness of the following LEVERAGE products:

Do not know Somewhat about the Aware product

Total Aware

Very Aware

Aware

Vendor Management & ePurchasing (Ventelligence)

91%

35%

38%

18%

9%

Discount office equipment & supplies (Office Depot)

96%

29%

44%

23%

4%

Debit & Credit Card Services (CO-OP)

92%

26%

51%

15%

8%

Audit & Consulting services (CU-ACE)

93%

28%

45%

20%

7%

Member enhancements (Sprint & Invest in America)

91%

29%

44%

18%

9%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Aware = Very Aware + Aware + Somewhat Aware.

57


Strategic Business Partners Q: Please indicate your general satisfaction level with the services and value provided by the following system partners that you have used in the last 12 months. Total Satisfied

Very Satisfied

Satisfied

Not Satisfied

Strongly Dissatisfied

Do not use them

2010 Satisfied

CUNA Mutual Group

84%

22%

62%

13%

2%

0%

80%

Corporate America CU

98%

30%

29%

1%

0%

41%

82%

Southeast Corporate CU

75%

22%

31%

19%

19%

9%

53%

CO-OP Financial Service

88%

11%

33%

5%

1%

50%

59%

CU 24 Network CUNA Strategic Service (CSS)

86%

13%

30%

7%

0%

50%

71%

84%

3%

24%

4%

1%

67%

40%

Note: No Opinion responses have been removed. Total Satisfied = Very Satisfied + Satisfied (“Do not use them� responses were removed)

58


2011 Membership Survey Results

59


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.