Apple Valley and Rosemount Minnesota 2012 Voters Guide

2 0 1 2

Don’t forget to vote on November 6.

In this guide you will find questionnaires completed by candidates from all city and state races within the Sun Thisweek Apple Valley/Rosemount coverage area.

Apple Valley City Council candidates Michael Holsten, Wilma Ruppert and Nicholas Stepka and incumbents Tom Goodwin and Ruth Grendahl are running for two four-year council seats The current terms of Goodwin and Grendahl expire on Dec. 31.

Rosemount City Council candidates Vanessa Olson Demuth, Joseph P. Zanmiller, Joe Kurle and incumbent Council Member Jeff Weisensel are vying for two, four-year terms.

The terms of council members Matt Kearney and Weisensel expire at the end of the year. Kearney, who was selected to fill former council member Kurt Bills’s term two years ago, did not file.

Newly elected council members will begin their terms in January 2013.

The Senate District 57 race is for an open four-year seat vacated by Chris Gerlach, R-Apple Valley.

Vying for the position are DFLer Greg Clausen and Republican Pat Hall.

An open two-year seat in House District 57B was created when Kurt Bills, RRosemount, decided to run for U.S. Senate. That seat is being contested by Anna Wills, R, and Jeff Wilfahrt, DFL. The other House District 57A seat is currently held by incumbent Tara Mack, RApple Valley, who is being opposed by Roberta Gibbons, DFL-Apple Valley, for the two-year seat.

Polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 6.

More election information is at www.ci.rosemount.mn.us, www.ci.apple-valley. mn.us and www.sos.state.mn.us.

Candidate questionnaire responses for Dakota County commissioners are in today’s A-section.

2B

October 26, 2012 Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide

Apple Valley City Council - two four-year seats Tom Goodwin, incumbent Age: 68 Address: 13015 Garvin Brook Lane, Apple Valley Occupation: Financial management consultant to Tom local government, retired Goodwin Education: B.S, political science, University of Wisconsin; masters of public administration – Northern Illinois University Previous elected, appointed or volunteer positions: Apple Valley City Council, mayor pro tem; vice president, Apple Valley Economic Development Authority; past president, Metro Cities Association; board member, League of Minnesota Cities; National League of Cities Finance/Administration Committee; American Legion Post 1776 – veteran of U.S. Marine Corps; Apple Valley Rotary Club charter member; Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce; Fort Snelling Memorial Rifle Squad.

1) Why should people vote for you?

The main reason people should vote for me is because of the excellent shape that Apple Valley is in at this time. The council has

reduced property taxes on over 90 percent of Apple Valley homes in four of the last five years. Apple Valley is one of 17 Minnesota cities out of 856 to obtain a Triple A top bond credit rating. In 2010 Money Magazine rated Apple Valley the 20th best city in America. Recently, the council approved a way of rebuilding city roads without the need for special assessments. The Apple Valley park system is one of the best in Minnesota. There is no question that the present council has Apple Valley on the right track.

2) What should be the top funding priorities?

The top funding priorities for the city should continue to be public safety and public works. Over the past few years the police department has lost officers due to retirement and job changes and they have not been replaced. At this time the department is three positions short of its authorized level of 48. The city hopes to have these positions filled by the end of the year.

Another funding priority is code enforcement. Presently the city has one code enforcement officer. Adding to this staff should be a priority in future years.

3) What cost cutting measures to city spending would you support?

STATE REPRESENTATIVE ELECT

ROZ

PETERSON Vote Roz Peterson November 6th www.rozpeterson.com Paid and prepared for by “Elect Roz Peterson” Committee 12295 162nd St. W., Lakeville, MN 55044 952-892-1782

Apple Valley has already accomplished a number of cost cutting and cost sharing operations. Examples include ABLE-Apple Valley, Burnsville, Lakeville, Eagan fire training facility; ALF-Apple Valley, Lakeville, Farmington ambulance service; Dakota County Communication Center-joint dispatch; and Valley Acres-Apple Valley and Eagan police firearms training range. In addition, Apple Valley has cooperative joint purchasing arrangements with the state of Minnesota. The city council will continue to look for additional ways to cost share.

4) In what ways can the city improve the delivery of its services?

Recently the city has made great strides in using the Apple Valley website to improve delivery of services. Citizens can now pay utilities and register and pay for recreational programs online. Also, Apple Valley’s entire budget is online, as well as council meetings, agendas, and information packets. The council and city staff are constantly looking for new ways to communicate with citizens through the web site.

5) What areas of economic development do you think the city can improve upon?

At the present time there are about 275 acres of undeveloped gravel pits in Apple Valley. This area is critical to the future final assessed value of the city. Recently, Apple Valley revised its comprehensive development plan through 2030 with all gravel pit property and other undeveloped property included. The result was a future mixture of commercial and residential use. We are already benefiting from this plan with the announcement that Parkside Village Apartments, a 332-unit upscale development, will be built on Galaxie and 153rd Street.

Ruth Grendahl, incumbent Age: 57 Address: 13685 Pennock Ave. Apple Valley Occupation: Small business owner Education: Minnesota State University-Mankato – master of arts, public administration; bachelor of Ruth science, urban and regional Grendahl studies; bachelor of arts, political science.

Previous elected, appointed or volunteer positions: Apple Valley City Council member; Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Trustee (MnSCU) 2005-2010; Dakota County G.E.A.R.S. representative; MN Livable Communities Advisory Committee chair 2005 - 2010; MVTA commissioner (Minnesota Valley Transit Authority) 1997-

2009; Apple Valley Economic Development Authority; MN Women in City Government Executive Board; Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce; Minneapolis United Way Allocations Committee, Strengthening Families Panel, seven years; state of Minnesota – Department of Public Service deputy commissioner, assistant commissioner of telecommunications, Board of Podiatric Medicine, executive director; Minnesota Perpich Center for Arts Education Board; Minnesota State University-Mankato College of Science, Engineering & Technology Industrial Advisory Board; Council of Great Lakes Governors Biomass Council, Minnesota representative.

1) Why should people vote for you?

I am asking for your vote to be re-elected to the Apple Valley City Council because we must continue to elect people who put sound management of our tax dollars first.

Moody’s Investor Services recently affirmed our Aaa bond rating, stating this highest rating reflected “strong financial operations.”

In 2010, Money Magazine named Apple Valley the 20th best place to live in the United States, up from 24th in 2008 and 28th in 2007. It is important to me that we continue on the path of being fiscally responsible, a safe community, an attractive place to live and create a positive business climate resulting in local jobs – and this is why I am running for re-election.

2) What should be the top funding priorities for the city?

Continued emphasis on financially supporting our public safety needs, provided through our police and fire departments. I supported filling our vacant police department positions in this budget to accomplish this funding priority.

Expansion of our Water Treatment Plant is critical to meet our citizen’s needs for safe drinking water.

A transportation infrastructure that meets our city’s needs, for both new and reconstructed roads, which is imperative to ensure safe movement and access for our citizens and businesses.

Code enforcement continues to be a funding priority. In door knocking all around this city, I see homes that are not being kept up as they have been in the past, whether due to foreclosures or just financially strapped as homeowners. We must be proactive in code enforcement to ensure our city remains a safe and attractive place to live.

3) What cost-cutting measures to city spending would you support?

About 70 percent the general fund budget reflects salaries and benefits, while almost 30 percent is spent on commodities such as electricity, gas, etc. I have been reluctant to creSee GRENDAHL, 3B

3B At some point we must ask ourselves: do we want to fund projects that buses professionals out of our community more easily, or fund projects to keep those professionals working close to home. With any budget matter, I will keep to the principle that I have in my home – is this a need or a want?

If it is a want, I will work with private organizations to help to ensure that the government encourages good business decisions with our tangible assets, while also ensuring optimal transportation around the city. If it is a need, I will do my best to make sure that we attain the need in the best manner possible.

3) What cost-cutting measures to city spending would you support?

The city needs to keep reviewing where the funds are directed to and to what programs they are going. Apple Valley has a good, healthy budget. It is important to ensure that the “status quo” does not stop us from being financially disciplined. Just because a program exists now, does not mean it needs to exist forever. I promise to look at issues from multiple sides and always respect the limited role of government and the limited funds given to the city. I am interested in eliminating time spent by the police ticketing people parked on the street overnight.

4) In what ways can the city improve the delivery of its services?

I would work with Charter Communications, or any other service provider willing to listen, to ensure that we are ahead of the curve when it comes to fiber communications. Businesses need high-speed, highbandwidth solutions to be able to support increased numbers of staff.

5) What areas of economic development do you think the city can improve upon?

Economic development is our city’s effort to increase the standard of living. I believe Apple Valley is missing out on events such as Pan-O-Prog and Leprechaun Days.

I will work with our businesses to create a large-scale event that brings us all together.

As a business consultant, I see Apple Valley far behind our neighboring cities in terms of the amount of commercial businesses and I don’t want that gap to increase.

Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide October 26, 2012

GRENDAHL, from 2B ate any new positions and I evaluate vacant positions before recommending filling them.

As Minnesota Department of Public Service deputy commissioner I have been responsible for implementing energy conservation measures, and have aggressively supported initiatives to lower city energy costs.

Commitment to measures affecting almost our entire budget has allowed taxes to decline the past four years for about 90 percent of homeowners.

I will continue to pursue such cost-cutting measures.

4) In what way can the city improve the delivery of its services?

Technology is an area I have focused on to improve delivery of services. I have supported an enhanced city website for citizen’s use. This year, two examples of improving delivery of city services were recognized by allowing citizens to register for Parks and Recreation activities online and implementing our eUtility Billing, where 24/7 you can make payments, view your billing payment history and water consumption. I support initiatives such as these to make city provided services more accessible and convenient for our citizens.

5) What areas of economic development do you think the city can improve upon?

I always strive for lower taxes, as it is one of the most important messages sent to improve economic development. Improved transportation infrastructure, including new or improved roads, something we have all been living with over the past year, is a requirement for economic development growth. When the road improvements are completed, economic development will be enhanced in Apple Valley, attracting new businesses and translating into jobs and an increased tax base.

Michael Holsten Sun Thisweek did not receive candidate questionnaire responses from Michael Holsten.

Wilma Ruppert Age: 56 Address: 12754 Foliage Court, Apple Valley Occupation: Logistics team leader, aerospace company Education: Business De- Wilma gree – Technical School Ruppert (Maryland); Business/Human Resources Emphasis – Attended Normandale, University of Minnesota and Inver Hills Community College; Previous elected, appointed or volunteer positions: Dakota County Human Services Advisory Board; lead election judge (Dakota County, six years); CAP Board (three

years); Union Gospel Mission (15 years); People Serving People; Women’s Shelter; Grace Church (EP) – Usher & World Missions Events (19 years).

1) Why should people vote for you?

Twenty-five year resident, passionate about Apple Valley; committed; listens to understand; “It’s not about me!” – I sincerely care that Apple Valley maintains having a well-educated workforce and stays on track for being recognized as “pro-business.” On the campaign trail I’m hearing residents do not understand why taxes continue to increase, but property values decrease. Residents want a voice – many do not even know there is a council; Apple Valley being viewed as stagnant with trends of same old-same old including restaurants, other business ventures. All this said, new leaders are needed with fresh ideas to fill vacancies, those willing to step out of their comfort zone.

You will not go wrong selecting me as “your choice.”

2) What should be the top funding priorities?

Business development supporting job growth; technology, upscale townhome development, adequate fire and safety resources; trees replacing those uprooted by construction (residents have been adamant about replacement) many noted “this is why I moved to Apple Valley”; tourism.

3) What cost cutting measures to city spending would you support?

Community events expenditures out of city budget; council meetings that spend numerous hours discussing insignificant items (i.e. where signage should be allowed for realtors, freelance businesses, political, other?). If you tour at least seven suburbs in a 12-mile radius, you will see signage everywhere. Not saying right or wrong – just pointing out all time spent was city budget dollars. In my opinion – seems “old school”; consolidate multiple committees (i.e. Urban Affairs, Planning could be joint effort).

4) In what ways can the city improve the delivery of its services?

Consistent and constant communication – “Corner Spot” once a month in local paper highlighting important issues affecting local population; begin 2013 with resident focus groups and/or town hall on quarterly basis chaired by two council members providing round-table discussion allowing shared views, providing feedback as to what is important; have resident reviews on how city administration (including council) is progressing or digressing.

5) What areas of economic development do you think the city can improve upon?

Business growth; tourism; jobs. Unfortunately we have lost some business with job opportunities. We are slow to grow and noone is visibly doing anything about it. Why does Burnsville have the largest employer in the southern burbs? Eagan has BCBS, CocaCola, major strip mall convenient to resi-

dents and extremely prosperous to business.

Eagan and Burnsville have multiple diverse restaurants. Research shows comprehensive “2030” blueprint – but if plan is to be activated, we should be discussing now. Our future depends on leadership saying “what’s happening?” and “what’s being done to make sure we have a plan in place?”

Nicholas Stepka Age: 29 Address: 13643 Everton Ave., Apple Valley Occupation: Consultant Education: University of MinnesotaDuluth Previous elected, appointed or volunteer positions: President, Greenleaf Sixth Homeowners Association; CD2 seated alternate delegate 2012 State Convention.

1) Why should people Nicholas vote for you?

Our City Council is in Stepka need of young homeowners to be represented. I will keep the city of Apple Valley progressing in the right direction. I will work to ensure that our graduating students feel that Apple Valley is a great community to live in, the same choice their parents had to make. I will work to ensure Apple Valley has the fewest barriers of entry for new businesses, as well as encourage corporate expansion of non-retail jobs. My experience as president of my townhome association shows the respect that my peers have entrusted in me. I will ensure that Apple Valley remains a community that attracts young highly skilled families, and work with local businesses to ensure that the city is not limiting success.

2) What should be the top funding priorities for the city?

The greatest responsibility the City Council has, is to keep us safe. If the citizens really wanted (and needed) busing, it would not be subsidized by our city, but instead run as a private successful enterprise.

JOE KURLE FOR CITY COUNCIL

www.joekurle.com Vote for a New Voice in Rosemount Experience in Leadership: • Precinct Chairman, Senate District 57B (since 2010) • Delegate to MN State Political Convention (2010) • Business Owner/Entrepreneur (since 2006)

• 12 Years in Residential & Commercial Building Industry (Local, National, & International Projects) • Church Leadership (Christ Church & Faith in Christ Fellowship) • Eagle Scout (Boy Scouts of America)

Paid for by Joe Kurle, 14835 Cambrian Ave. W, Rosemount, MN 55068

4B

October 26, 2012 Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide

Rosemount City Council - two, four-year seats Joe Kurle Age: 33 Address: 14835 Cambrian Ave. W., Rosemount Occupation: Small business owner/Residential Draftsman Family: Married to Joe Kurle Marie Kurle and we have 3 young daughters Qualifications: Precinct chairman, Senate District 57B (since 2010); delegate to 2010 Minnesota State Political Convention; business owner/entrepreneur (since 2006); 12 Years in residential and commercial building industry; worked on local, national, and international building projects; church leadership (Christ Church & Faith in Christ Fellowship); Eagle Scout (Boy Scouts of America); Associate of Science degree in architectural drafting from Northwest Technical Institute (2000); Prosource Realtor school (2004) 1) A 25-year mining permit is currently under review by the city of Rosemount.

Are you satisfied with the process and that issues related to the mining operation’s impact on the environment and surrounding areas have been addressed? What has worked well? If not, what issues do you think are still outstanding?

I am not completely satisfied that all the issues of the environment and drinking water are addressed. I would like to see an independent company assess the levels of all contaminants in UMore Park, not just the most common ones. The U of M has hired an independent company to assess the land, but that company is being paid by the U of M. I’d like to have another company review that assessment and be paid by the city of Rosemount.

That would ensure a non-biased view.

2) The city of Rosemount has been able to hold down the city portion of property taxes for the past several years. Are there areas of the budget where more savings could be realized?

We need to maintain those low property taxes for residents by bringing in more businesses to Rosemount. Companies like Trader Joe’s would serve a real need for the city and surrounding communities.

We also need to fill the vacant commercial buildings around Rosemount with small businesses. Along with more businesses, we need to be wise with future investments and fiscally responsible with the taxpayer’s money.

3) How can the City Council address other issues of importance to you?

I have four main goals I’d like to work

on if I get elected, but it’s really about what’s important to Rosemount residents, not me. The goals I’ve set for myself are: Making sure the senior center and senior housing complex is built properly and with the views of our seniors in mind; making sure the environmental and noise issues of UMore Park are dealt with properly; Getting several small and large businesses to open up in Rosemount; being fiscally responsible with the taxpayer’s money.

4) What do you bring to the table that other candidates don’t?

I own a small residential drafting business here in Rosemount. I work with building contractors every day and understand how residential and light commercial construction projects operate. That is a vital asset to have on the City Council as Rosemount continues to grow. I am younger than the other candidates and am in a different stage of life. My wife and I have three young daughters and it’s important for us to have safe streets. It’s even more important now that more kids are walking to school due to cutbacks in school bus transportation.

Vanessa Demuth Age: 43 Address: 14087 Dearborn Path, Rosemount Occupation: Geologist, 20 years experience. Fam- Vanessa ily: Brian and I have been Demuth married for 15 years and we have two daughters; Shale, who is in ninth grade at Rosemount High School and Monique, who is in seventh grade at Rosemount Middle School.

Qualifications: I am a professional geologist with over 20 years experience in both the public and private sector. I work in the Water Resources Department at Dakota County. I am a state of Minnesota Registered Environmental Health Sanitarian and a State of Minnesota Certified Water Well Inspector. Over three years ago I was appointed by the City Council to the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals and Adjustment. It’s been a rewarding experience that’s allowed me to be involved in making significant contributions to support responsible community development of new businesses and residential housing.

1) A 25-year mining permit is currently under review by the city of Rosemount. Are you satisfied with the process and that issues related to the mining operation’s impact on the environment and surrounding areas have been addressed? What has worked well? If not, what issues do you think are still out-

standing?

The process entailed informational meetings, review of a large number of reports, public hearings and a large scale mining ordinance was written to govern the mine. I made several contributions to the ordinance that are protective of the environment and our drinking water. A portion of the aggregate mining will occur below the water table. The resulting 132-acre mine-pit lake that will be created, will be hydraulically connected to the bedrock aquifer that supplies the city wells. Forever, we will be responsible for managing the water quality in the lake so it does not degrade our drinking water aquifer.

2) The city of Rosemount has been able to hold down the city portion of property taxes for the past several years. Are there areas of the budget where more savings could be realized?

The city has done a great job holding down the city portion of property taxes. I would like to remove $10 million from the Capital Improvement Plan that is budgeted for a drinking water treatment plant. This plant will treat the water for aesthetics only.

The city should wait for a federal or state drinking water standard change that would require a treatment plant. Should this change occur, there would likely be federal or state grant money available to help offset the expense of a water treatment plant.

3) How can the City Council address other issues of importance to you?

We need to attract businesses that create jobs that pay a living wage. We need to streamline the process to review and approve permits for new businesses or business expansion. If that means that the Planning Commission or the City Council needs to meet more frequently to move the process along faster, then that is what should be done. I think the 52-acre business park site with Minnesota Shovel Ready designation and exploring the viability of a business incubator program are steps in the right direction.

4) What do you bring to the table that other candidates don’t?

I earned a Business Administration Entrepreneurship degree from the University of St. Thomas, in addition to a degree in geology. My business experience will help me to work with the business community in Rosemount because I understand the challenges businesses face. I have worked in both the public and private sectors. My career in geology has focused on groundwater issues. The city of Rosemount’s drinking water is groundwater obtained from water wells. There will be challenges in the near future for the city to provide and protect our supply of clean drinking water.

Jeff Weisensel Age: 53 Address: 13815 Danbury Court, Rosemount Family: Kathy, wife for 30 years with three adult daughters; Ashley and Jeff Lt. Scott Sturm, USMC; Weisensel Kelsey, and Lindsey.

Occupation: Construction project manager, Target Corporation Qualifications: Education: BS civil engineering ’82 and MS project management ’07, UW-Platteville. Previous elected, appointed or volunteer positions: Rosemount City Council since 2008; appointed vice mayor, 2009; Rosemount Port Authority 2008 to present, chair 2010-current; National League of Cities Community & Economic Development policy committee 2012; Dakota Communications Center Board director since 2010; Rosemount City Council liaison to Youth Commission 2011-current; Rosemount Planning Commission 1997-2004, chair 2001-2004; Rosemount Wetlands Ordinance Task Force 2004, 2012; Dakota County 4-H Federation finance director since 2002; Dakota County Extension Committee six years, three as chairman.

1) A 25-year mining permit is currently under review by the city of Rosemount.

Are you satisfied with the process and that issues related to the mining operation’s impact on the environment and surrounding areas have been addressed? What has worked well? If not, what issues do you think are still outstanding?

Yes, the city staff and consultants are following recommendations identified within the approved Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR), the blanket environmental review of this specific proposed project area. The mining permit under review must comply with the city of Rosemount Large Scale Mining Ordinance, specifically enacted with considerable citizen and Planning Commission input to ensure and address environmental issues and concerns. Citizen input is occurring prior to any final approvals or issuing of the permit. The permit would have an annual permit renewal component to address concerns that may arise during mining operations if necessary.

2) The city of Rosemount has been able to hold down the city portion of property taxes for the past several years. Are there areas of the budget where more savings could be realized?

Our budget process is nearly a year round process to identify revenues and See ROSEMOUNT COUNCIL, 5B

Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide October 26, 2012

balance outlays to meet the services and infrastructure our citizens expect. Personnel costs represent the largest outlay and variable in our budget and can result in savings but also reduces the level of service. Do we want less police and fire service or longer times for snow removal?

Most residents have said no, even during the recession. I see the greatest opportunities coming from productivity opportunities to do more with less through our new website and technology as well as cross job training.

3) How can the City Council address other issues of importance to you?

I believe over the past four years, I have cultivated a level of respect and trust with the other City Council members to allow any concern or issue to be given a hearing as well as serious consideration to act on.

Annually, the council goal-setting session is a forum for building trust and establishing a clear line of communication with each member. Monthly, our meetings and work sessions reinforce the collaborative spirit and consistent manner our council takes to provide orderly and productive policy for the community.

4) What do you bring to the table that other candidates don’t?

The community experience from my earlier tenure on the Planning Commission as well as having served the past four years on the City Council and Port Authority build upon the technical civil engineering training and project management foundational skills I bring to council. This gives me perspective. Additionally, I have built my public leadership competencies over the past couple of years in the areas of being an effective communicator, a collaborator in developing and promoting partnerships as well as a catalyst to motivate and promote change.

Joseph (Joe) P. Zanmiller Age: 54 Address: 14886 Cimarron Ave. W. Occupation: Information technology supervisor Joe Family: Wife of 17 years Zanmiller Shannon; daughters: Ashley, 26, paramedic, Stephanie, 16, RHS junior, Hannah, 12, sixth grade RMS; son: James, 14, RHS freshman.

Qualifications: Education: RHS class of ’77, University of Minnesota. Service: Member Minnesota Valley Transit authority (MVTA), past member Rosemount Jaycees. Employment: University of Minnesota 22 years; 32 years experience working in information technology

industry; 12 years in management and project management. Lifelong Rosemount resident.

1) A 25-year mining permit is currently under review by the city of Rosemount. Are you satisfied with the process and that issues related to the mining operation’s impact on the environment and surrounding areas have been addressed? What has worked well? If not, what issues do you think are still outstanding?

The process to review the mining permit currently under review by the city has been satisfactory albeit slow. The effort was time consuming but did effectively address the physical and environmental concerns. The process overlooked the positive impact of having this essential and limited resource available to the greater metro area and the cost benefit to metro construction. When the mining is done the community will have an appealing landscape to develop.

2) The city of Rosemount has been able to hold down the city portion of property taxes for the past several years. Are there areas of the budget where more savings could be realized?

There are always ways to reduce a budget. Options that do not limit the ability to respond to life safety issues can be explored. This could include revamping our governance to where we elect a full-time mayor who functions as our city administrator to outsourcing administrative support functions. Additionally, we need to explore partnering with our school district and county to ensure full utilization of our public resources and ensure that duplication of service is minimized.

3) How can the City Council address other issues of importance to you?

More community engagement and economic development are key to keeping Rosemount a preferred place to call home.

With the council promoting greater community engagement we will have feedback that allows the council to establish policy that in turn establishes a community vision. As an outer tier suburb economic development is essential to our vitality.

We need to ensure our transportation and communications infrastructures are evolving to meet changing businesses’ and residents’ needs.

4) What do you bring to the table that other candidates don’t?

As an information technology and project manager with 12 years of experience I will bring to the council a skill set that will complement the council’s skills.

The skills I will bring to the table include managing budget, timelines, and personnel. My lifelong tenure as a resident brings a historical perspective of what our community has done and the reasoning behind the efforts.

TOM GOODWIN RETURN TOM GOODWIN TO THE APPLE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

CITY COUNCIL APPLE VALLEY HIGHLIGHTS

CITY COUNCIL

ROSEMOUNT COUNCIL, from 4B

5B

• Property tax reduction for 90% of Apple Valley homes, 4 of last 5 years • Triple A top bond credit rating • 20th best city in America, Money Magazine-2010

PROVEN EXPERIENCE AND LEADERSHIP • Apple Valley City Council Mayor Pro Tem • Vice President Apple Valley Economic Development Authority

FAMILY

• Wife Linda; son Gregg, son Geoff and daughter in-law Alison, two grandchildren Angela and Grady

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

• Apple Valley resident 33 years • American Legion Post 1776-Veteran United States Marine Corps • Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce and Rotary Club Member

EDUCATION • University of Wisconsin-Whitewater-BS Political Science • Northern Illinois University-Masters of Public Administration

Prepared and paid for by the Tom Goodwin Volunteer Committee, Co-Chairpersons Larry Rivers, 13336 Huntington Drive, Apple Valley, MN 55124 Ruth Erickson, 14299 Garland Avenue, Apple Valley, MN 55124

6B

October 26, 2012 Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide

Senate District 57 - one, four-year term

Greg Clausen, DFL Age: 65 Address: 13277 Huntington Terrace Apple Valley, Occupation: Educator Family: Married for 42 years to Roberta; three adult children: Steve, Beth and Julie; three grandsons: Greg Clausen Dylan, Ty and Jack with two grandchildren expected in 2013 Qualifications: I have spent over 40 years in public service as a classroom teacher, coach, Apple Valley assistant principal, Rosemount High School principal and district office administrator. I currently secure federal and state funding for District 196 by writing and administering grants. In the community, I am a member of the Dakota County Affordable Housing Coalition and serve on the Dakota Woodlands Homeless Shelter Board of Directors. My experience

as an educator and community involvement will bring leadership, consensus building, public service, sense of community responsibility and a strong work ethic to the Minnesota Senate.

1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office say a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

A balanced approach is needed to reduce the deficit through tax reform, managing budget spending, budget reductions and revenue enhancements. Spending cut discussions must include studies on their effectiveness and consequences. All spending cuts will affect some aspect of society and have the potential of creating damaging reductions in essential public services and loss of jobs making economic recovery difficult.

We must cut spending through prudent and prioritized budget reductions, identify costsaving and efficiency measures to manage

budget spending, study tax reforms, identify and close tax loopholes and create revenue enhancements.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session.

What if any reforms do you support?

Tax reform must be studied by understanding the effect on jobs, personal income and impact upon the middle class. Taxes and their relationship to job growth and personal income drive swings in state revenue.

Minnesota has the highest sales tax rate in the five-state area yet taxes the least amount of goods. Exploring an E-commerce sales tax will raise revenue and support Minnesota businesses. Property taxes (currently the leading source of state revenue), income taxes and sales taxes need to be balanced in terms of revenue produced.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

As a state, we need to align available jobs and the skills needed by workers to be hired. This “skill-set” alignment requires an investment in training programs by both the private and public sectors. Using public funds to invest in public projects creates jobs and addresses infrastructure needs of the state. Focusing on employment growth and improving the business climate by evaluating, restructuring, and strengthening existing programs such as the Angel Tax Credit, JOBZ, New Jobs Tax Credit and the Minnesota Investment Fund through tax relief and job creation will encourage growth.

4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

Education is the infrastructure that drives the Minnesota economy and ultimately the quality of life for our citizens.

See SENATE DISTRICT 57, 7B

House District 57A - one, two-year term Roberta Gibbons, DFL Age: 50 Address: P.O. Box 240364, Apple Valley Occupation: Personal lines insurance agent Family: Husband, Patrick and two sons – Christopher and Michael Roberta Qualifications: LifeGibbons time resident of Minnesota. Associate of arts degree – Rochester Community College. Past president, state representative and show director for ICES. Past president and finance chair of the Cedar Park Elementary Site Council. Former member of the Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Local Advisory Group. Current MIIAB Board Member. Co-founder and past chair of the Young Insurance Professionals of Minnesota.

1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

The current legislature has tried to balance the budget through a series of extreme cuts, budget shifts and tax cuts. There is no way that we can continue down this path.

We must keep all options on the table including revenue generation and budget cuts.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session.

What if any reforms do you support?

I absolutely support Governor Dayton’s

efforts to reform our current tax system. I also support his efforts to restore tax fairness to our citizens and to close corporate tax loopholes that allow corporations to receive tax breaks for shipping jobs overseas.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

The Legislature can lower tax rates for small business owners, close corporate loopholes that allow big corporations to benefit by shipping jobs overseas, attract new companies with sustainable wage jobs to the state, invest in Minnesota by passing an appropriate bonding bill which will create jobs and invest in education which will give Minnesota the crop of well educated citizens that we need in order to attract new companies.

4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

Yes, I would definitely support an increase to the per-pupil funding. In addition, I would also support allowing for inflationary increases in state funding to schools – something that hasn’t happened since 2003.

I also believe that we need to review and/or reform the tuitions that are being charged

by MnSCU educational institutions. Finally, I believe that we must pay back the $2.4 billion shift to the K-12 budget.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

Minnesota faces continued deficits in

our transportation/transit funding needs.

We need to increase transportation/transit funding – and work more closely with our elected officials in Washington, D.C., to secure additional federal funds in an effort to promote multi-modal methods of transit as well as improvements to infrastructure.

I also believe that we need to continue to embrace light and commuter rail as viable mass transit methods.

Tara Mack, incumbent, Republican Age, address, occupation, family, qualifications: Not provided 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund Tara Mack deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

No – economic growth is also part of the solution. Right now we are ahead of revenue projections for the current biennium. This higher tax revenue is due to increased economic activity. By not raising taxes and attempting to make Minnesota a more friendly place to do business, we gave job creators a reason to expand their business. This resulted in more economic activity, more job growth and higher tax revenues. This economic growth, combined with the slowing of state spending, will result in a budget solution,

which again does not require tax increases.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session.

What if any reforms do you support?

I support any reform that makes Minnesota a better place to do business. Right now we have one of the highest income tax rates in the country. Many small businesses pay taxes through the individual income tax.

By reforming or closing some credits and deductions we can lower the rate and make Minnesota more friendly for job creators.

The Corporate Income Tax is another area in need of reform. Currently, this tax is very regressive and results in less job creation and lower wages for Minnesota workers. We should reform this tax as well to help trigger more job growth.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

Tax reform is critical to showing businesses at home, in other states and abroad that Minnesota is open for business. By streamlining the code and lowering tax rates, the cost of doing business will be reduced. This means more jobs for unemployed workers and higher wages for Minnesota employees.

We also need to cut red-tape and eliminate duplicative regulations which make it harder to do business in Minnesota. This issue has bi-partisan agreement, as evidenced by the permitting reform of last session. There is more to be done, however, to really make it See HOUSE DISTRICT 57A, 8B

Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide October 26, 2012

SENATE DISTRICT 57, from 6B Minnesota schools need consistent and sustainable funding and yes, I support an increase in the state’s per-pupil funding formula. Education funding has not kept pace with inflation over the past 10 years. Unfunded special education mandates alone have offset increases to the general fund passed by the 2011 Legislature. Changing student needs are challenging schools. Limited English proficient students, technology, homeless students and the number of students receiving free or reduced meal service have affected education budgets.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

Minnesota’s transportation infrastructure requires a balanced investment program in long-term solutions for transit growth in an environmentally sound way.

Mass transit programs utilizing light rail, Metro Transit, creative solutions (in/out same lanes based on time of day, differing work hours, roundabouts), bike and walking paths are all solutions working together to meet our transportation needs. Bonding bills for road and bridge construction, repair and mass transit initiatives will fulfill the needs of current and future generations of Minnesotans with the costs shared and paid over time by users.

Pat Hall, Republican Age: 58 Address: 13884 Glendale Court, Apple Valley Occupation: Pastor/adjunct professor Pat Hall Family: Married (wife, Debra), three daughters (Molly, Renee, and Bethany) Qualifications: My wife and I have lived in this area for 20 years. We raised our daughters here, with all three having graduated from ISD 196. I have been involved in the community as chaplain to the Rosemount Police Department and have been an ordained pastor for the last 23 years, including ministering to families impacted by the I-35W bridge collapse. Prior to being in ministry, I was employed in the insurance, printing, and banking industries. I know the values and needs of the residents of Senate District 57 and possess the life experience to serve you well at the Legislature.

1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

We live in a difficult and challenging economic time. In recent years, many families have had to learn to live within their means

to survive. Government should be no different. The next biennial budget is projected to take in $1.7 billion in more revenue than the current budget. We don’t have a revenue problem – we have a spending problem. It is possible to prioritize spending, reduce government waste, and live within our means to balance the state’s budget.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session.

What if any reforms do you support?

I support tax reforms that simplify the tax code and do not increase the tax burden on individuals, families, and businesses. The key to creating jobs and improving the state’s economic climate and budget situation is for the Legislature to not increase the tax burden on individuals, families, and businesses but, rather, to allow them to keep more of their hard-earned money to spend and invest as they see fit.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

The private sector is the engine of job creation. We must create a tax-and-regulatory environment that is hospitable to job creation and growth. Unfortunately, we fall short of that mark. The Tax Foundation ranked Minnesota 45th in 2012 for state tax business climate. This is not acceptable. To improve our state’s business climate, the 2013

Jeff Wilfahrt

wilfahrt.org

Rosemount, Coates and northern Apple Valley

EDUCATION ECONOMY EQUALITY Photo by David J. Andrews

A fair person with real life expereinces Jeff Wilfahrt grew up in the small town of New Ulm, Minnesota. He earned a degree from the University of Minnesota at Morris and has lived in Rosemount for the past 28 years.

Jeff is committed to:

Giving everyone the opportunity to do well in economic terms; Providing access to affordable, quality education; and Preserving the hard-earned rights of all Minnesotans.

Legislature must pass a balanced budget that does not increase the tax burden on individuals, families, and businesses and must repeal unnecessary and burdensome regulations that hinder job growth and creation.

4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

I support ensuring our schools receive the funding they need to succeed. Adequate funding, however, is not the only touchstone of a strong public education system – strong academic performance, teacher and administrative accountability, equitable funding, and access to good public schools – are also touchstones of a strong public education system. I will support legislation and policies that promote these principles, with the goal of ensuring our students receive a worldclass education.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

Minnesotans are fortunate they have many choices for travel. Most drive their own car, while some use mass transit, such as the bus or light rail, to travel. While it is important we maintain a variety of options that Minnesotans can use to travel, my focus will be to support transportation projects that meet the needs of how most Minnesotans choose to travel – which is by motor vehicle.

Photo by Kristina Lapinski

Minnesota House of Representatives—57B A well balanced candidate

7B

Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount resident 28 years, Minnesota resident for life

Working for ALL

“Society is stronger when we all work together and when each of our contributions is acknowledged and valued. Respect and cooperation need to be brought back to our state government.”

— Jeff Wilfahrt, Candidate for the Minnesota House of Representatives, 57B Prepared & Paid for by Wilfahrt for House Election Committee, 12707 Chinchilla Avenue, Rosemount, MN 55068

8B October 26, 2012 Apple Valley/Rosemount Voters Guide the per-pupil formula in education funding.

HOUSE DISTRICT 57A, from 6B District 196 schools saw an increase in the easier to create jobs in Minnesota. per pupil formula resulting in an additional 4) Would you support an increase to the $1.5 million each year for the biennium. For state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why the first time we are seeing greater equity not? Are there areas of education funding or in funding for our south suburban schools, policy reform you support? which is an issue that has been a priority for I am very proud of the work that was me since I was first elected. I will continue to done over the past two years in regards to work for reforms that put students first, em-

power parents and prioritize the dollars for better outcomes.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

We need to look for ways to reduce the time and cost for highway construction.

There is evidence that constructing a mile of highway in Iowa, for example, is much cheaper than constructing a mile of highway

in Minnesota. Streamlining environmental permitting, as we did for counties in 2012 is one possible cost reduction that will free up monies to be used in other areas. In regards to transit, we need reform in who has the authority to do transit planning and return the decision making to local officials who are more responsive to the needs of their communities.

Jeff Wilfahrt, DFL

ing will receive my support. The caution here is to proceed prudently and judiciously and not react in a willful and ill timed manner.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012.

What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

The power of public projects under bonding is the single greatest boon for the middle class the government can effect. From infrastructure to public works, to funding for health, arts and education the government can and should appropriate financial support or incentives. For too long we have labored solely under supply side economic argument, now it is time to focus and balance the demand side, and that means livable wage jobs. Business needs consumers. If wages decay further, it is ultimately businesses that will fail.

4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula?

Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

Having read the Minnesota funding formula what can be said it is that it is convoluted and difficult for even professionals to fully comprehend. As it stands now government funding is down to 80 percent leaving districts to identify by levy the remaining 20 percent. This approach pits homeowners against school boards and creates community acrimony. Not healthy for the community and certainly not healthy for education. Yes, I support an increase via stable funding.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

For too long the Legislature has ignored professionals on this subject. It is time to formulate long term policy based on their professional opinions and not on the political whims of the majority party. This all ties back to bonding and vision for the state. There are jobs to be had and should no longer be ignored. The future is upon us and we are at the moment ill prepared and tardy dealing with the transportation issue.

House District 57B Anna Wills, Republican Age: 28 Address: 7480 Germane Trail, Apple Valley Occupation: Minnesota Senate legislative staff Anna Family: Married, Wills spouse Rob Qualifications: I have the unique experience of working in the Legislature and understand how to navigate the complicated process of making a bill into law.

I’ve been out in the community meeting the residents of our district to hear their concerns. Listening to constituents is one of the most important qualifications a legislator can possess, and something I am committed to maintaining if elected into office. I attended Northwestern College. I served in many volunteer leadership positions; as a volunteer coordinator, a campaign office manager, and as the Burnsville City Chair for the 2008 Presidential Campaign.

1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

I don’t believe the state will see a $1.1 billion shortfall when the new forecast comes out in November. The same department that conducts the forecast has also shown our current revenues to be exceeding their projections by over $300 million. This is mainly due to greater income tax revenue through the individual and corporate tax system. This is not due to increased rates, but rather increased economic activity and lower unemployment. Only through greater economic expansion, and true spending reform, can we eliminate our re-occurring deficits.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session.

What if any reforms do you support?

I support reform that would provide greater clarity and ease for the average Minnesota taxpayer. Families in Minnesota are working their jobs, raising their families, and trying to make ends meet in these difficult economic times. They do

not need a tax system in which they are penalized for missing one of a hundred lines, or miss out on a desperately needed tax break because they were not aware of it. Minnesotans need a tax system that is responsive to them and not the other way around.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state?

Government must stop penalizing businesses that are just trying to be successful in Minnesota. Last year the Legislature tried providing tax relief to every Minnesota business by freezing the state business property tax levy. Not everyone knows businesses pay both local and state property taxes. With the state dipping even deeper into every business’ pocket, they are reducing the amount of money that businesses would use to expand and add more jobs. Government does not create jobs. Government’s responsibility is to create a healthy environment for job growth by reducing tax and regulatory burdens that are stifling Minnesota businesses.

4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

The current Legislature increased per pupil funding by $100 over the coming biennium, thus showing a strong commitment to excellence in education in Minnesota. I am focused on maintaining that commitment by working to pay back the school shift and finding a system that rewards our excellent teachers for advancing student achievement.

5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future?

It is critical that we maintain and improve our state’s existing infrastructure by ensuring that funding for roads and bridges continues to be a priority in upcoming bonding bills. I support strengthening Minnesota’s transit system with cost-effective solutions and working with MnDOT to make our roads safe and efficient for commuters in our district.

Age: 59 Address: 12707 Chinchilla Ave., Rosemount Occupation: Engineering inspection and measurement software writer Family: Wife of 34 years, three children, eldest killed in Afghanistan Qualifications: The Jeff MN DFL approached Wilfahrt me to run against Kurt Bills for the Minnesota House seat. Since that time Bills has entered the Senate race. I am an engineering software developer and as such I am a data-driven decision maker. I am and remain fiscally conservative and socially progressive. The legacy of innovative and progress oriented government Minnesota enjoys is worth protecting.

1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium.

Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

The existing budget requirements exist because individuals and groups appeared before the Legislature and fought for them. Any attempt to reduce, restrict or remove these appropriations should in fair play require the opponents to appear and de-allocate by persuasion and argument specific programs. Reduction of tax revenue is the sole reason for the deficit. The state budget remains at a consistent level relative to the Gross State Product. It is not as swollen as detractors submit it to be.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support?

After 20 years of self employment I know all too well who is under represented in the tax code. The code is indeed uneven in its fairness. Any reform that places individuals, businesses and unearned income on more equal foot-