Dossier: 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning

F O R D ’ S E L E C T R I C P I C K U P S H OW S O N E P O S S I B L E F U T U R E .

THIS IS ABOUT SOMETHING very American. In the United States (and Canada and Mexico), pickup trucks aren’t mere tools, but aspirations. The boss drives a pickup here, and the boss’s boss does too. Pickups in North America are status symbols, family heirlooms, and beloved companions. And the all-electric F-150 Lightning adds environmental virtue beyond that. Plus, it’s about the quickest brick Ford has ever thrown.

“We’re investing in [internal-combustion engine] segments where we’re dominant and where we think, as competitors leave the segments, we can actually grow, ” Ford CEO Jim Farley told Fox Business in September. “I find it intriguing that we’re portraying the future of our industry as monolithic. That’s not how it goes. That’s not how it’s going to manifest itself. ”

The new Lightning is appreciated within a line of personal-use, occasionally high-performance pickups: from the cushy 1955 Chevrolet Cameo to Dodge’s rowdy 1978 Lil’ Red Express and on to the insane turbocharged 1991 GMC Syclone, the 2004 V-10-powered Ram SRT-10, and the two Fords that previously wore the Lightning name— where some utility is forsaken for looks, luxury, acceleration, and audacity.

Deceptively, the new Lightning wears F-150 skin. The aluminum cab and body pieces port from Ford’s best-selling F-series more or less intact. This isn’t Tesla’s someday Cybertruck doorstop moon buggy or the ludicrously large Hummer EV bent on domination. If an observer doesn’t know the Lightning’s discreet styling cues, it swims anonymously amid the traffic stream.

Under that mild-mannered costume, however, is a Kryptonian thing. It uses a conventionalstyle steel ladder frame, but instead of the rear leaf springs and solid axle used on full-size Ford trucks since 1917, there are independent control arms and coil springs at each corner (the current F-150 Raptor also uses coils). Between the frame rails, where conventional F-150s put engine, transmission, driveshaft, exhaust system, and fuel tank, there’s a tray of batteries and electric motors between both the front and rear pairs of wheels.

A. The Lightning hides a sea change under its familiar-looking skin. B. This F-150 allows up to 320 miles of range per charge, plenty for chasing back roads. C. Ford knows: Don’t fix what ain’t broke. The

Lightning’s cabin feels familiar to the

F-series faithful.

B

C

Combine the Lightning’s two three-phase fixed-magnet motors, and monster torque is available to push (and pull) the more than 6800 pounds of unladen truck. The majority of Lightnings (like the one tested here) come equipped with the 131kWh extended-range battery. That’s up from the standard battery pack’s 98-kWh load of zap.

Electric motors make the same torque from the moment their rotor starts moving within their stator. So, no matter the battery pack, there’s a massive 775 lb-ft available in the Lightning. That’s 55 percent more than the 500 lb-ft available from the 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6, the torquiest non-Raptor version of the F-150 with solely an internal-combustion engine. The F-150 Hybrid, which pairs that turbo V-6 with a supplementary electric motor and battery pack, runs at a stated 570 lb-ft of peak torque.

Because the extended-range batteries discharge more efficiently than the standard pack, the base Lightning is rated at 452 hp, while the highercapacity model gets 580 hp. Ford claims a range of 230 miles for the standard Lightning and 320 miles for the extended-range in XLT and Lariat trims. Go for the high-zooty Platinum model, and that figure drops to 300. Ford claims it takes eight hours to recharge the battery from 15 to 100 percent using the 80-amp home charge station that comes with extended-range trucks. That drops to a claimed 41 minutes (to charge from 15 to 80 percent) on a 150-kW Level 3 charger.

Dear God and ghost of Henry Ford, this thing is quick. Our testing saw an extended range, 6855pound F-150 Lightning Platinum absolutely blitz to 60 mph in 4.0 seconds flat. Consider this: The 450-hp 2021 Raptor needs 5.2 seconds to reach 60 mph. The only quicker trucks are the mighty Ram TRX with its supercharged Hemi V-8, which reached 60 mph in just 3.7 seconds, and the 835hp, 7135-pound Rivian R1T, which spat in the eye of physics with a 3.3-second 0–60-mph rip.

Ford Special Vehicle Team’s head engineer noted in 2009 that the Lightning hot-rod pickup had to die because there was no sustainable market for a high-performance, on-road pickup truck. And anyway, he said, they’d need 600 or more

A. An electric brick worthy of canyon straightaways, the

Lightning hits 60 in just 4.0 seconds.

rodded tweaks included an aluminum driveshaft, a limited-slip differential, and 4.10 gears out back. Custom shocks and a set of front and rear anti-roll bars helped keep the power under control. The Lightning even used a version of the F-250’s beefier frame. The performance upgrades didn’t come at the cost of capability: The Lightning’s tow rating matched that of standard F-150s. Distinctive 17-inch wheels, bucket seats, color-matched bumpers, a front air dam, and Lightning decals make the first-gen truck easy to identify. It was offered only in black, red, or white exterior paint. Ford sold 11,563 first-gen Lightnings. B. Second Generation: 1999–2004

After a three-year absence, the F-150

SVT Lightning returned in 1999 as a far more aggressive sport truck than its predecessor. It came exclusively in the regular-cab, short-bed configuration and was no longer as capable at typical tasks like towing as its counterparts. Its payload capacity was a measly 800 pounds when it debuted. That later increased to 1350 pounds. Truckish capability suffered, but the Lightning’s performance improved dramatically. The 5.4-liter V-8 engine, which came fitted with an intercooled supercharger, provided 360 hp and 440 lb-ft when it debuted, later bumped to 380 hp and 450 lb-ft for 2001. A Detroit Locker rear differential helped keep things tidy during the truck’s 5.2-second 0–60-mph runs. Upgraded front and rear shocks and four-wheel ABS and disc brakes rounded out the major upgrades. Bilstein shocks became standard in 2001. The truck’s body was heavily reworked compared to the standard F-150, with new fascias, fog lamps, air deflectors, and rocker moldings. Unique 18-inch wheels came wrapped in Goodyear Eagle F1 tires. Ford built 28,124 secondgen Lightnings. B

horsepower to deliver meaningful performance, given the weight of a full-size truck. So Ford took a hard left off-road with the Raptor, exiling the V-8-powered Lightnings to the Island of Misfit Toys. It’s an irony lost on no one that the Lightning has returned with almost 600 hp and absurd acceleration figures while wearing the cloak of environmental virtue, not performance.

As impressive as the Lightning’s initial acceleration is, its passing power is even more thrilling. At freeway speeds, the Lightning loafs along almost noiselessly. Slam the not-loud pedal, and the thing squats down and squirts forward as if it were auditioning to star as a fighter jet in the next Top Gun sequel. It’s not the astonishing vertebrae destruction that comes with the Tesla Model S Plaid, but it is leagues more dazzling than any other F-series.

More subtle is how differently the Lightning handles from other F-150s. Because the Lightning

A

B

A. It’s easy to overwhelm the Lightning’s front tires post-apex, but how many big trucks ask questions about understeer? B. Say it again quick:

“Lightning lighting,

Lightning lighting,

Lightning lighting. ”

A. Ford introduces a new concept: the spooky-silent full-size pickup truck. B. Towing is on the menu, just not very far or very fast. C. Who knew the Lightning nameplate would stand the test of time so perfectly? B spreads its massive weight across its 145.5-inch wheelbase, it’s more settled in its on-road ride. It carries 50.2 percent of its weight on the front wheels and 49.8 percent on the rear. That’s vastly superior to, for example, the F-150 Tremor, which puts 57.4 percent of its heft up front.

So, road undulations that have unladen conventional pickups jiggling their tails have no effect on the Lightning. It’s even better in ride quality than new trucks like the Ram 1500 and Toyota Tundra that support their solid rear axles on coil springs. Yeah, the Lightning weighs a bazillion pounds, but it spreads its bulk.

Near-perfect weight distribution doesn’t directly translate into sports-car handling. Riding on 275/50R-22 General Grabber HTS60 tires, the Lightning doesn’t put much tread face on the ground relative to its weight and length. The steering is numb and not very quick, but not atypical of other trucks. It’s easy to overwhelm the tires in a corner, even if the Lightning will pull strongly post-apex as it straightens itself out. This isn’t a horse bred for barrel racing.

Even in XLT trim, which is one step up from the base Pro level, the Lightning has a comfortable cabin. Move up in trim and the center screen sizes up from 12 inches to a robust 15.5, but that’s too much. The 12-inch touchscreen is plenty big for virtually any function and doesn’t produce so much glare. The easygoing XLT trim, including heated cloth seats, is restrained to the point of being comforting. There’s no pretense that this is a Lincoln. It has the confidence to be a truck’s truck.

And it’s a silent operator. Spooky silent. It’s so quiet, things that go unnoticed in other trucks— the sounds of the driver’s palms abrading against the steering wheel or that initial moment when a shoe hits either pedal—are apparent in the Lightning. One can hear what seems to be the body mounts shifting over the frame on speed bumps and road divots.

But while the XLT is truck-trimmed, the Lightning has limitations as a truck. First, even though it’s hugely long, much of that length is taken up by the four-door cab. The bed is only 67.1 inches

A. The Lightning as it was, an old-school, no-holds-barred, bare-knuckled ball of speed and hyperbole. B. Few F-150 Lightnings survived the intervening decades without modification. Thank the supercharged gods for that.

Foundation Stock

The second-gen 2003 Lightning delivers things the new one can’t.

Nostalgia is a gooey thing. It presents a past more imagined than real—a vision through the Vaseline-covered corneas of youth. But seat time in Jesus Martinez’s 2003 Ford SVT F-150 Lightning merits some bygone myopia. The all-electric F-150 Lightning is quicker but not always better.

At 31, Martinez isn’t old enough to have driven his truck when it was new. Unencumbered by memories, he appreciates the pickup’s sensations as fresh things. “It’s all mechanical, ” he explains. “That’s what’s so great about it. ”

Running 100-plusoctane E85, the black Lightning ignites with a vivid whine from the M112 Roots-style supercharger. Approaching its 20th birthday, Martinez’s truck has, well, evolved a bit over the decades. The blower has overdriven pulleys, the intake is freer flowing, and there’s an aftermarket exhaust that sounds like it’s singing La Traviata in the exact key of a 5.4liter 16-valve overheadcam V-8.

The 2003 Lightning was the next-to-last year for this second generation, so it benefitted from an update for 2001, when it sprouted a new 90-mm mass air flow sensor and the finaldrive ratio shortened to 3.73:1. That upped the engine’s output from 360 hp during 1999 and 2000 to 380 for models built between 2001 and 2004. The 0–60-mph romp took 5.2 seconds back then. That’s 1.2 seconds less rapid than its electric son, but it’s a fun 1.2 seconds.

Now a novelty, the old Lightning is what was once known as a regular-cab truck. “I like the cab, ” Martinez shares. “It means I can tell people there’s no room for them to come along. ”

When Ford’s SVT was a thing, all its vehicles wore white-face gauges that reverse-glowed at night. They are here in all their analog glory behind a steering wheel with a thin rim and an airbag the size of a large fanny pack. There’s even a column-mounted wand controlling the fourspeed automatic transmission. “It’s a burnout machine, ” Martinez says about his rear-drive, stepside beast.

Wearing Nitto tires on stock 18-inch wheels, the aged Lightning has presence and attitude. Some of the decoration is old school—like two-tone upholstery— but it’s not archaic. There’s badassery here, both intimidating and charming.

The suspension is stiff, and the hydraulically assisted steering is almost soulful in its communion with the front tires. Turn-in isn’t quick, but it is satisfying. The comfort comes from the sensations the truck generates, not those things from which it isolates the driver.

Roaring along the streets of Maywood, California—gateway to Vernon, the City of Commerce, and parts of Los Angeles—good things that have passed away from current trucks become obvious. This F-150’s cowl is low, and the hood drops away for better visibility. The dashboard doesn’t glow with massive screens but trusts the driver to interpret its info and read a map. It offers things no new truck maker is selling now.

Some mist in the eyes is okay.

A. This electric F-150 has proved to be a hit from the get-go.

Will the rest of the

American truck industry follow Ford’s lead? Surely. long, meaning things like four-wheelers or motorcycles will hang out onto the tailgate. Longer lumber loads will take a supply of red flags to mark the overhang.

With that in mind, the greater deficit is that as load increases, range takes a hit. That’s particularly true when towing. While extended-range Lightnings are rated at 1952 pounds of cargo capacity and 7700 pounds of towing ability (and up to 10,000 pounds with the Max Trailer Tow package), trips will have to be planned carefully. Car and Driver, our sister publication, hooked up a 6100-pound trailer and saw the Lightning’s range drop by more than half. Even more daunting, the indicated range calculated by the truck’s algorithm dropped from a predicted 288 miles to a mere 96. For cross-country towing adventures, the Lightning makes little sense.

As a machine for bouncing around town, taking the dogs along, or moving some stuff a short distance, the Lightning is fine. And with its large front trunk, it’s a great personal companion if it often runs unladen. It says all the right things about the boss who is driving it.

Still, at this point, before the last gas station closes and while there are things worth towing, more conventional F-150s will be a better choice for many buyers. The F-150 Hybrid looks like a solid compromise, considering it’s easy to refuel and carries a 25-mpg EPA fuel economy rating on both the highway and in the city.

Also, the Lightning isn’t cheap. From a base price of $54,769, including a $1795 destination charge, the 2022 XLT rose to $76,384 as driven. The Platinum track-test example cost a whopping $93,609. And with all the production already committed, dealers are getting a lot more. There’s something very American about that too.

n i 3 . 8 7 : t h g i e H

Front Track: 68.1 in Wheelbase: 145.5 in Length: 232.7 in

Width: 80.0 in Rear Track: 68.3 in

Price

Base .................................. $92,669 As Tested ........................... $93,609 Engine

Layout: Dual permanent-magnet synchronous AC motor s Configuration: front/rear transver se mounted

Battery

Liquid-cooled lithium-ion pouch, 131.0 kWh

Torque 775 lb-ft

Horsepower 580 hp

Batteries Compared

Standard E x tended-Range

Capacit y, kWh

98.0

131.0

Hor sepower

452

580

Range, miles

230

Ef ficiency, MPGe cit y

Additional Cost, $ 0 300/320

76 78

10K

Transmission

Driven Wheels ........... all-wheel drive Type ............................... direc t-drive Rear Dif ferential: mechanical locking Reduc tion ratios bet ween motor and wheels ................. F: 9.719 R: 9.611

Steering

Assist .................................. elec tric Turns Lock-to-Lock ...................... 3.3 Turning Circle ... 47.8 f t (curb-to-curb) Suspension

Front ...................... double wishbone Rear ... independent semi-trailing arms Brakes and Tires

Front: 14.0 x 1.3-in vented disc, 2-piston caliper s Rear: 13.8 x 0.9-in vented disc, 1-piston caliper Stabilit y Control: par tially defeatable Tires: General Grabber HTS60 275/50R-22 (115T) M+S E xtra Load Body and Chassis

Construc tion: body-on-frame Material: steel frame, high-streng th, aluminum alloy Door s/Seats: 4/5 Cargo Capacit y: 52.8 f t³ (box), 14.1 f t³ (front trunk) Weight

Curb Weight ....... 6855 lb (as tested) Weight-to-Power ............. 11.8 lb/hp Fuel

EPA Cit y/Hw y ............... 78/63 MPGe Capacit y: 131-kWh ex tended-range bat ter y Range .............................. 300 miles

Test Results

Acceleration

100

H P M

60

1/4-mile 12.7 sec @ 107 mph

0–60 mph 4.0 sec

30

0 SECONDS

Results in graph omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. 20

Top Speed (MFR) 110 mph

Braking 70–0 mph 180 ft

Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad 0.77 g

Curb Weight 6855 lb

F: 50.2% R: 49.8%