VOLUME 101, ISSUE NO. 9 | STUDENT-RUN SINCE 1916 | RICETHRESHER.ORG | WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2016
SA funds 3 new initiatives Amber Tong News Editor
VICTORY AT LAST
Led by 407 passing yards and five passing touchdowns by senior quarterback Tyler Stehling in the best performance of his career, the Rice University football team topped Prairie View A&M University 65-44 on Saturday.
Aniket Tolpadi
Thresher Staff
0see FOOTBALL, page 11
A total of $1,900 has been granted to three organizations under the Student Association Initiatives Fund by the Blanket Tax Committee, according to SA Treasurer and BTC member Maurice Frediere. As nine other applications were rejected, some raised regarding the criteria of the funding and whether it was clearly communicated. Of the 12 clubs that submitted applications for funding, two received their full requests: Society of Professional Hispanic Engineers received $500 to host a cultural dinner and Rice Club Sailing Team received $1,000 to rent sailboats for their first annual regatta, a race for collegiate sailors across the nation. SPHE President Alejandro Akerlundh said the event will expand the club’s mission from professional development to cultural outreach. Rice Sailing President Amy Fox said a fully funded regatta will increase Rice’s presence in the sailing community and allow sailors to participate even if they can’t pay. “This regatta, which will be entirely cost-free to all participants, combats the view of sailing as socioeconomic[ally] discriminatory,” Fox, a Baker College senior, said. Rice Student Volunteering Program, a blanket tax organization, received $400 of their $1,000 request to reimburse drivers for off-campus volunteering. RSVP president Kalian Shi said the club will benefit from the funding and she is satisfied with the preliminary amount. “[The] fund gives us more flexibility in shifting our budget 0see FUND, page 2
sean chu /thresher
Honor Council pushes for statute of limitations, lowered penalties Emily Abdow
Assistant News Editor
achal srinivasan/thresher
Members of the Honor Council discuss new penalty guidelines at their annual Consensus Penalty Strucutre meeting, where they decided to modify punishment criteria and enact a statute of limitations on cases.
The undergraduate student Honor Council proposed several changes to its constitution, including expanding the Council and implementing a statute of limitations, and passed an updated Consensus Penalty Structure, at an open meeting on Saturday. The CPS is a system for evaluating Honor Code violations that outlines penalties in order to provide students and faculty with an expectation for case outcomes. This encompasses plagiarism, falsifying data and cheating. The updated CPS will be used for cases received after Oct. 22. Since increasing the number of Council members entails a constitutional revision, such a change requires presentation to the Student Association and a vote of approval by the student body to go into effect. Honor Council Chair Katie Jensen said expansion is necessary, as the current Council composition is restricted by standards set in 1948 when the student body was less than a
third of its current size. In addition, in 2015 the Council lost almost one third of its voting members with the creation of the graduate student Honor Council. Jensen said the proposed solution, to alter the Council’s constitution so the composition is defined in the bylaws, would allow the Council to alter its size with an internal vote. “We wanted to change the Constitution in a way that would allow for flexibility in future years if the Council is faced with an extremely heavy case load,” Jensen, a Lovett College senior, said. A second change to be brought before the SA is a statute of limitations which would give the Council the power to declare a case cannot be heard. In the proposed statute, such a situation could arise in three situations: if 90 days have passed between the suspected violation and its discovery, if more than 15 days have passed between the violation being discovered and reported to the Council or if more than a semester has passed between when the violation is discovered and the evidence presented.
The statute of limitations is partly in response to a case in an Introduction to Program Design (COMP 215) course in which the professor waited almost a semester to report a suspected violation. While the incident occurred in spring 2015, the case was not heard by Honor Council until fall 2015. Former Honor Council Chair Alex Metcalf said without a statute of limitations, students are at risk of a professor collecting evidence against them without their knowledge, placing them at a disadvantage in the process. “The decisions we make are based off of material evidence,” Metcalf, a Will Rice College senior, said. “If the professor has structured their case such that it is very difficult for the student to submit tangible and useful material into evidence, then [students] don’t have a case.” The statute of limitations was also recommended by the Faculty Senate’s Task Force on the Honor System, which was comprised of faculty and undergraduates, and engaged in a yearlong process of evaluating the 0see HONOR, page 3