VOLUME 105, ISSUE NO. 2 | STUDENT-RUN SINCE 1916 | RICETHRESHER.ORG | WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2020
ILLUSTRATION BY CHLOE XU
FEATURES
Bridging the gaps: Student activists aim to protect survivors in face of new Title IX policy, express concerns about transparency MORGAN GAGE THRESHER STAFF
In early May, as a challenging spring semester came to an end, the Department of Education released the final version of a new Title IX policy, leaving school administrations across the country scrambling to adjust their own Title IX policies to reflect the federal policy before an Aug. 14 deadline amidst navigating a global pandemic. With these new rules came a slew of student advocacy at Rice as students pushed administrators to implement the new policy in a way that minimizes the harmful effects the updated federal guidelines have for survivors of sexual assault. With these guideline changes, faculty and staff at schools are no longer considered mandatory reporters or required to report incidences of reported Title IX misconduct nationwide, although Rice employees are considered mandatory reporters under Texas legislation. The definition of harassment was rewritten as conduct that “effectively denied” someone access to an education, whereas it was previously defined as
conduct that interfered with someone receiving an education. Live case hearings are now mandated to include cross-examinations of each party, a move that student activists criticized due to cross-examination’s potential of retraumatizing survivors through already stressful hearings. Many student activists, primarily members of Students Transforming Rice into a Violence-free Environment and the Student Association Senate, anticipated the release of the new federal guidelines for policy concerning gender based discrimination and interpersonal violence for schools across the United States. Aliza Brown, advocacy coordinator for STRIVE, was in touch with the Department of Education even before the new policy was released, after she learned about some of the policies the Department was considering from members of the SAFE Office: Interpersonal Misconduct Prevention and Support. “I wrote a comment back to the Department of Education, as a lot of people did, telling them why these were horrible ideas,” Brown, a Will
FEATURES
Black at Rice: Calista Ukeh throws herself into the Rice community KAVYA SAHNI ASST FEATURES EDITOR
Calista Ukeh was in the middle of throwing at a track meet during her senior year of high school when she received her admissions decision from Rice. As far as the throwing went, she was not having a great day — but that changed after she read the acceptance letter. “I literally saw [the email] right in a crowd of people, by myself, just me and the phone,” Ukeh said. “And right after that I went and threw my personal best. And it was such a funny instance, because no one knew why I was so happy and giddy.” A few months later, Ukeh would take her event — throwing — to a new field — Rice University’s. Ukeh, a junior at Baker College, grew up in Rockwall, right outside of Dallas. She describes the town as predominantly wealthy, white and Republican. Although her own
family was not very affluent, according to Ukeh, her mom “hustled” to make sure she and her two older siblings could attend school in one of the best independent school districts. “[Having grown up in this community] gives me a lot of experience with how to talk to people from different backgrounds,” Ukeh said. “Especially because so many people in my community that loved me and I loved were part of that demographic.” Ukeh said that she’d been taught to have a strong work ethic from both sides of her family. Her father, who is originally from Nigeria, moved to the U.S. seeking a better future. Her mother is white and grew up in the U.S. without much money. Ukeh’s mom went back to school when she was 38, which Ukeh said has impacted her perspective of the value of education and has inspired her to want to do better for herself and for her SEE BLACK
AT RICE PAGE 4
Rice College junior, said. “When they released the actual plan, I was overall disturbed. It is a definite step backwards for survivors’ rights and makes campuses across the country less safe.” From there, it became a question for student advocates of what Rice
I was overall disturbed. It is a definite step backwards for survivors’ rights and makes campuses across the country less safe. Aliza Brown STRIVE ADVOCACY COORDINATOR could do to bridge the gaps left by the new guidelines, according to STRIVE’s associate director Sara Emami, and they began to center conversations around how to make the policy ultimately implemented better suited to protecting survivors’ rights.
“A lot of things that people I know had commented against were still in the policy,” Emami, a Brown College junior, said. “We were trying to figure out what was strictly federal policy that we would have to adhere to and where were areas where we could influence the Rice policy and see how we could make it so it was most supportive for survivors at Rice.” When the committee to write Rice’s new Title IX policy was formed, an undergraduate and graduate student representative were included to help provide a student perspective on the policy. However, Anastasia Newheart, the graduate representative on the policy writing committee, said she felt a need for more student feedback in the process. “The most important thing is for students to be directly involved with the process,” Newheart said. “I was the only graduate student involved in this process, and, of course, I cannot represent the perspective of every single graduate student.” Izzie Karohl, undergraduate representative on the Title IX taskforce and head of the SA’s Interpersonal Violence Policy Committee said one of the continuous challenges for activists and policy writers alike was contending with the turnaround between the federal government’s release of the new policy on May 6 and the deadline for Rice to implement the new policy on Aug. 14. “The timing just felt a little bit cruel,” Karohl, a Will Rice junior, said. “It’s almost like [the Department of Education] didn’t care if the policies were well developed because of how much time we had to do them.” Time constraints were also an issue within the meetings themselves, which only lasted for an hour each week for a committee of 15 people, according to Karohl. “It meant that some voices took up a lot of air time, and it meant that others didn’t,” Karohl said. “It was hard in the moments where you realize that you weren’t going to get your word in or really have full time to debate an idea.” In addition to the presence of an undergraduate and graduate student representative on the policy writing committee, students were able to weigh in on the policy through regular conversations held over Zoom between members of STRIVE Executive Council, representatives from the SA, and Rice’s Title IX Coordinator Richard Baker. However, some students who participated in those meetings said they felt ignored. “It was good to have a line of communication between us and Dr. Baker, but gradually we started to feel that our requests were not being heard,” STRIVE Executive Director Maddy Scannell said. “Most notably, we felt like Rice did not communicate to the student body what was going on at all.” SEE TITLE IX PAGE 5
NEWS
Petition reflects student dissatisfaction with servery food and contact tracing IVANKA PEREZ EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
A student-written petition expressing concerns about the administration’s handling of fall semester has reached 442 signatures at the time of print. Students shared dissatisfactions with the administration ranging from those listed in the petition — servery food and a new “medical hold” health status — to concerns about contact tracing. In the petition, Jones College sophomores Jay Shisler and Harry Golen wrote about Shisler’s experience with a COVID-19 test, writing that they felt it demonstrated Rice’s lack of preparation to test students who were experiencing coronavirus-like symptoms that were likely not due to the coronavirus. (Editor’s note: Shisler and Golen declined to comment for this article, stating that the petition encapsulated their thoughts on the matter, and that they wanted to meet with Dean
of Undergraduates Bridget Gorman before discussing these issues on the record.) “Upon arrival [at my testing location], I explained that my throat had been hurting, as it had been on and off for six months,” Shisler wrote. “I was turned away from the testing location and instructed to call Rice Student Health to determine my next steps and fill out a health form.” After this point, Shisler wrote that Student Health Services created a medical hold category for his position — a student who had not yet tested positive, but was showing symptoms. “Crisis Management would not be delivering my meals as they did not want to place me on an official list. Instead, a friend would carefully and discreetly deliver my meals,” Shisler wrote. “My roommate and I were instructed to move into one of the few open suites in Jones, where we could avoid a communal bathroom.” SEE PETITION PAGE 2