Architecture Portfolio - Tim Greening by Tim Greening

P O R T F O L I O TIM GREENING

CONTENTS

SELECTED WORKS REGIONAL CRAFT NET-ZERO MODULAR INK FACTORY HERRINGBONE HOUSE GENERAL CANNABIS HQ GATEWAY

01 11 15 19 23 27

GRAPHIC DESIGN

ILLUSTRATION

MODELING

GREENING.ARCH@GMAIL.COM

631-879-7539

REGIONAL CRAFT

An exploration in critical regionalism, this project was focused around the thesis “how alternative livework arrangements can expand economic opportunity for artisans and cultivate authorship of new building methods and components”

Located in Santa Maria Atzompa, Oaxaca, Mexico the solution was to re-imagine an existing home and studio for a multi-generational family of local ceramic artisans. This included a reorganization of the workspace for simpler and efficient workflows, creation of a path through the studio to a showroom, and organization of the living spaces that allowed the family to enjoy views of the surrounding landscape. Also developed were structural beams that would allow the family to develop and create building components that could be tested and showcased within their shop; opening up additional revenue streams and creative outlets. The focus here was to create an opportunity for the family to have authorship of their space, thereby enhancing the regional aspects of the home studio. As street walls are a typical component of homes in rural Mexico, a facade was developed using customized breeze blocks to feature as a screen version of this street wall. The form for the breeze blocks was then scaled, stretched and reoriented to be used as lightwell components in the roofing system. New York Institute of Technology Thesis - Fall 2017-Spring 2018

5 3

5 6

1. MAIN ENTRY 1. MAIN ENTRY 2. TEMPORARY AUTOMOTIVE 2. TEMPORARY SHOP AUTOMOTIVE SHOP 3. LOUNGE AND LEARNING 3. LOUNGE SPACE AND LEARNING SPACE 4. COURTYARD 4. COURTYARD 5. PURIFICATION AND MATERIAL 5. PURIFICATION AND MATERIAL STORAGE STORAGE 6. KILNS 6. KILNS 7. SAWDUST REDUCTION7.AREA SAWDUST REDUCTION AREA 8. WORKSHOP 8. WORKSHOP 9. PRODUCT STORAGE 9. PRODUCT STORAGE 10. SHOWROOM 10. SHOWROOM 11. DINING AREA 11. DINING AREA 12. KITCHEN 12. KITCHEN 13. MASTER SUITE BATH13. MASTER SUITE BATH 14. MASTER SUITE BED 14. MASTER SUITE BED

TALLER COATLICUE TALLER COATLICUE - GROUND FLOOR - GROUND FLOOR SCALE = 1/8”=1’-0”

SCALE = 1/8”=1’-0”

N SCALE:

1’

4’

8’

12’ SCALE:

1’

4’

8’

12’

EARLY STAGE CONCEPT COLLAGE

11 10

1. BEDROOM 1 2. BEDROOM 2 3. BATH 1 4. BATH 2 5. BEDROOM 3 6. BEDROOM 4 7. BEDROOM 5 8. BEDROOM 6 9. MATERIAL STORAGE 10. MEETING AND VIEWING TERRACE 11. ARTISAN RESIDENCY BED 1 12. ARTISAN RESIDENCY BATH 13. ARTISAN RESIDENCY BED 2

TALLER COATLICUE - FIRST FLOOR SCALE = 1/8”=1’-0”

N SCALE:

1’

4’

8’

12’

BRICK DESIGN STUDIES

BREEZEBLOCK DESIGN STUDIES VOID

12”

8 9 INITIAL SKETCH STUDIES

INITIAL SKETCH

SELECTED FORM

12”

16 17 15

8” 12”

CUBE (A)

LOFT CURVES (B)

BOOLEAN DIFFERENCE (B FROM A)

AGGREGATE

12”

CONNECTION TO BARRO PRODUCTS

1. REINFORCED PRE-CAST CONCRETE ROOF SLAB SYSTEM 2. RAIN GUTTER 3. STEEL TUBE RAIN CHANNEL 4. POLYURETHANE MOISTURE MEMBRANE 5. METAL ROOF WINDOW FRAME 6. DOUBLE GLAZED STRUCTURL WINDOW WITH AIR SPACE 7. REINFORCED PRE-CAST CONCRETE LIGHTWELL

INFILL

21 22

BOOLEAN DIFFERENCE (B FROM A)

ROOF AND LIGHTWELL DETAIL SCALE = 1-1/2”=1’-0”

3 4

AGGREGATION OF DESIGN

BLOCK 1

BLOCK 2

ROOF DESIGN STUDIES

BLOCK 3

BASE GEOMETRY

VOIDS ADDED

29 30

31 32

BLOCK 4

1. CUSTOM 12” x 12”x 8” CERAMIC BREEZE BLOCKS 2. STEEL FRAME CONSTRUCTION 3. RAIN GUTTER 4. ROOFING SURFACE 5. POLYURETHANE MEMBRANE 6. PLYWOOD UNDERLAYMENT 7. THERMAL INSULATION 8. REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOF SLAB 9. THERMAL INSULATION 10. PLASTER SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION 11. STEEL TOP RAIL FOR CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM COLLECTIVE UNIT 12. DOUBLE GLAZED CURTAIN WALL 13. STEEL BOTTOM RAIL FOR CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM 14. STEEL FRAME CONSTRUCTION 15. RAIN GUTTER 16. TREATED HARDWOOD DECKING 17. CEMENT SCREED 18. UNDERLAYMENT 19. THERMAL INSULATION 20. REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 21. HARDWOOD FLOORING 22. CEMENT SCREED 23. UNDERLAYMENT 9’ x 9’ SQUARE 24. GRID THERMAL INSULATION 25. REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM 26. TREATED HARDWOOD SIDING 27. METAL DOOR FRAME WITH TRACK FOR SLIDING DOOR SYSTEM 28. SLATTED HARDWOOD EXTERIOR SLIDING DOOR PANEL 29. STEEL BOTTOM TRACK FOR SLIDING DOOR SYSTEM 30. CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 31. COMPACTED SAND SUBSTRATE 32. COARSE GRANULAR SUBSTRATE

9 10

12 13

1. REINFORCED PRE-CAST ROOF SLAB SYSTEM 2. STEEL CONNECTION PLATE 3. EXPANSION ANCHOR FASTENERS LAID IN EPOXY 4. STEEL REINFORCING BAR LAID IN EPOXY 5. REINFORCED CONCRETED COLUMN 6. STEEL CONNECTION PLATE 7. EXPANSION ANCHOR FASTENERS LAID IN EPOXY 8. STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBE WELDED TO STEEL PLATE 9. WELDED ANGLED STEEL PLATE ANCHORS 10. EXPANSION ANCHOR FASTENERS LAID IN EPOXY 11. REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB 12. COMPACTED SAND SUBSTRATE 13. COARSE GRANULAR SUBSTRATE

3 4

5 6

10’-0” O.C.

FRONT FACADE AND WALL DETAIL

COLUMN AND ROOF DETAIL

SCALE = 1-1/2”=1’-0”

SCALE = 1-1/2”=1’-0” INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS

ISOMETRIC ROOF SECTION

FRONT FACADE AND WALL DETAIL SCALE = 1-1/2”=1’-0”

TALLER COATLICUE - EAST SECTION SCALE = 3/16”=1’-0”

SCALE:

1’

4’

8’

NET-ZERO MODULAR

In an effort to advance their commitment to sustainability, a major higher education institution asked for sustainable solutions to their need for new and renovated campus housing. We set out with the intent of developing a workable, simple solution that would provide institutions and developers with a means of building healthier, low-to-zero energy structures for students to occupy; while also bringing the cost and time-frame of construction down. The team focused on developing a solution based on the combined attributes of Net-Zero Buildings/Passive House Design and Modular Construction. It was our assertion that, based on current understanding these technologies, institutions could build residence halls to higher standards of occupant health, wellness and sustainability for costs comparable to, or even below, that of current conventional construction methods. The ultimate goal was to package this information into a graphical presentation that was easy to digest for the institution’s stakeholders. Project Team Principal: Design Director: Sr. Project Manager: Sr. Technical Architect: Designer | Planner:

Marc Spector Michael Mannetta Joseph Randazzo John Machovec Tim Greening

PASSIVE HOUSE AIRTIGHT ENVELOPE

CONTINUOUS INSULATION

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION

BALANCED HEAT- AND MOISTURE-RECOVERY VENTILATION

PASSIVE HOUSE

NET ZERO ENERGY

NET ZERO-MODULAR

HIGH-PERFORMANCE WINDOWS AND DOORS

MINIMAL SPACE CONDITIONING SYSTEM

ENERGY REDUCTION REDUCED CONSTRUCTION COST

ENHANCED QUALITY CONTROL INCREASED QUALITY CONTROL

OPERATIONAL COST REDUCTION

RENEWABLE ENERGY CREATION

REDUCED CONSTRUCTION COST

ENERGY DEMAND REDUCTION

REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS

INCREASED QUALITY CONTROL

NET POSITIVE ENERGY POTENTIAL

REDUCED PROJECT TIMELINE

FACTORY CREATE CONSISTENT QUALITY AIRTIGHT OF WORKENVELOPE PRODUCT REDUCED PROJECT TIMELINE NET ZERO ENERGY– CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT WITHIN ON-SITE ENERGY

RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

– CONSISTENT WORK FORCE: WEATHER DOES NOTBUILDING BREAK UP SCHEDULE, WORKERS LESSTO LIKELY TO LEAVE TO PICK UP WORK ELSEWHERE BEST PATH NET ZERO OFFSET OF NZE COST – ASSEMBLY LINE APPROACH ALLOWS FOR SPECIALIZED WORKERS – ROBOTIC MACHINERY AND FRAME JIGS AID IN PRECISION WELDS, FRAMING, AND ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENTS

OFFSET OF NZE BUILDING COST OPERATIONAL COST REDUCTION ENERGY DEMAND REDUCTION AIRTIGHT ENVELOPE

COST REDUCTION

BALANCED ENERGY SUPPLY WITH ENERGY DEMANDS

BEST PATH TO NET ZERO

– SIMULTANEOUS CONSTRUCTION OF COMPONENTS ALONG WITH FOUNDATIONS AND CIVIL/SITE WORK, REDUCING TIMELINE – REDUCED CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION COSTS DURING DOWNTIME AND WEATHER INCIDENTS, ETC. – FACTORY WORK NOT SUBJECT TO PREVAILING WAGE LABOR RATES – 500,000 SF FACTORY SPACE WITHIN A FEW HOURS OF PROJECT SITE REDUCES TRANSPORTATION TIME AND ASSOCIATED COSTS

RENEWABLE ENERGY CREATION

HIGH-PERFORMANCE DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION

USE OF PASSIVE DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE

REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS NET POSITIVE ENERGY POTENTIAL

NET ZERO POTENTIAL ENERGY PRODUCTION – CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED FROM THE INSIDE OUT - SEALING OF BOXES, SWITCHES, PENETRATIONS, ETC. MORE EASILY ACHIEVED BEFORE OUTER SHELL IS ATTACHED – MODULARIZATION ALLOWS FOR INDIVIDUAL HEATING AND COOLING UNITS – PRECISION WITHIN THE FACTORY CAN AID IN THE PLANNING AND ASSEMBLY OF EACH MODULE, INCLUDING THE FACADE AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS – INCREASED EFFECTIVENESS OF THE AIRTIGHT ENVELOPE

NET ZERO COST OFFSET – REDUCED CONSTRUCTION COSTS ACHIEVED THROUGH MODULAR CONSTRUCTION CAN OFFSET COSTS INCURRED FROM NET ZERO ENERGY AND PASSIVE HOUSE DESIGN STRATEGIES

COMPARATIVE TIMELINES PROCUREMENT/LEAD TIME

CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT/LEAD TIME

FACTORY CONSTRUCTION

TRANSPORT

FIELD CONSTRUCTION 30-40% TIME SAVINGS

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION University of Michigan Net Zero-Modular Design Presentation

12 02.06.2020

CONCEPTUAL SINGLE MODULE ASSEMBLY FACTORY INSTA VRF UNIT LLED LOCALIZED WITHIN M ODULE

RUCT

ION A

COUS

TICAL

NSTRUCTIO N ACOUSTI ASSEMBLY FACTORY IN CAL SIDE WALL STALLED

ENTR Y WA

LL PREF ABRIC

ATED S

TEEL

MODU

LE FR

AME FACT OR WIND Y ASSEMB OW A LED E SS X PASS EMBLY CO TERIOR W IVE H OUSE NSISTENT ALL / PRINC W IPLES ITH

LOW CAR BO N

University of Michigan NET ZERO ENERGY NetBUILDING Zero-Modular PREMIUM Design Presentation Institutional Quality Housing

Y PL

E RV ATIO N

O EMB

D DIE

@ BREAKEVEN COST OF CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION*

USING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION

USE

LOW CAR BO N

NET ZERO ENERGY

T WA

GY ER EN

02.06.2020 SU P

E RV ATIO N

CARBON NEUTRAL

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION SAVINGS Savings on Total Labor Costs

NET ZERO ENERGY BUILDING

R INS U SYST LATED FA E C OR FIE M FACTO ADE RY LD IN STALL ED

Y PL

SU P

NET ZERO ENERGY

SUPE

NET ZERO - MODULAR STUDENT HOUSING L

LOW ENERGY USE

REMENT + VERIFICATI ON ASU ME

ONST

LAR C

REMENT + VERIFICATI ON ASU ME

MODU

MODULAR CO

EMBODIED CARBON

POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS

DHW ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP

ENERGY RECOVERY VENTILATION UNIT

BRISE SOLEIL SUN SHADING REDUCE GLARE AND SOLAR HEAT GAIN

MULTI-PANE GLAZING IN WINDOWS MITIGATE SOLAR HEAT GAIN

PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS CAPTURE RENEWABLY SOURCED SOLAR ENERGY

(PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS CAN ALSO BE UTILIZED IN OPEN FIELDS OR AS PARKING CANOPIES, ETC. WHERE REQUIRED)

SUPER-INSULATED WALLS / FACADE SYSTEM MITIGATE THERMAL BRIDGING OF EXTREME OUTDOOR AIR

SINGLE MODULAR UNIT

LOCAL VRF | CHW/HW FAN COIL UNIT WITHIN EACH MODULE

ENERGY STAR APPLIANCES

UTILITY CHASE BETWEEN MODULAR UNITS AND CORRIDORS

RECYCLING OF HOT WATER AND WATER CONSERVING FIXTURES

INSULATED FOUNDATION WALLS AND SLAB

GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS AS (OPTIONAL) SUPPLEMENTAL SYSTEM TO HELP REDUCE HVAC AND HOT WATER ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

NET ZERO - MODULAR STUDENT HOUSING University of Michigan Net Zero-Modular Design Presentation

02.06.2020

INK FACTORY

The project site was a component of the proposed North Station Development Master Plan in North Philadelphia. The task was to redevelop the dilapidated production plant and warehouse buildings into an adaptive reuse structure. These conjoined, historic structures would serve as a single multi-use building with programming that included a boutique hotel, co-working spaces, production studios, gaming center, E-Sports Arena and restaurant. To create a visual connection through the public areas in the project, a void was cut through four of the building’s five stories; with celebratory circulation connecting the basement, first and second floors. The existing loading bay was utilized for it’s natural conversion into a main entry point. The entry zone was then carried through the building and into a public plaza, connecting the building with the train station and the rest of the proposed development. Overlooking this plaza a public restaurant is divided by what was once the facade of the structure; the expansive factory windows making way for connecting portals. The vision of the building was to create a hub of excitement for both commuters and local residents to gather. Project Team Principal: Design Director: Designer | Planner: Planner:

Marc Spector Michael Mannetta Tim Greening Carl Ricaurte

Base 3D modeling, components, and textures developed using Autodesk Revit. Rendering by third party.

SITE PLAN

LEGEND FITNESS CENTER RESTAURANT SERVICE DAYCARE HOTEL LEVEL 1 ROOF GARDEN

DAY CARE 1283 SF

KITCHEN 1537 SF

FITNESS RECEPTION 546 SF

RESTAURANT 6375 SF

ROOF GARDEN 7536 SF

LOCKER ROOM 487 SF

LOCKER ROOM 497 SF

FITNESS 6287 SF

MECHANICAL 602 SF

HOTEL LINENS 283 SF

HOTEL OFFICES 447 SF

HOTEL LOBBY

HOTEL LEVEL 1 201 309 SF

204 203 202 479 SF 306 SF 306 SF

207 205 206 325 SF 383 SF 385 SF

208 210 211 209 212 385 SF 385 SF 385 SF 385 SF 300 SF

213 347 SF

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

LEGEND MAKERS MARKET / EVENT SPACE CAFE / BISTRO SERVICE HOTEL SERVICE OFFICE AREA EVENT SPACE / GAME HOUSE RETAIL STORE

CAFE / BISTRO 1103 SF INK FACTORY LIVING ROOM 3549 SF

MECHANICAL ROOM 602 SF

MAKERS / ARTISANS 15510 SF

MEZZANINE AREA ABOVE

EVENT SPACE / GAMEHSE 8253 SF

STORAGE / UTILITY 283 SF

HOTEL ELEVATOR LOBBY 976 SF

RETAIL STORE 763 SF

OFFICE AREA 329 SF

UP DN

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

MODEL VIEW: SOUTHWEST ENTRY

LEGEND

LEGEND GAMING LOBBY SERVICE HOTEL VALET

MULTI-MEDIA & PRODUCTION STUDIOS SERVICE POST-PRODUCTION HOTEL LEVEL 4

VIP GAMING BAR/RESTAURANT 1803 SF

UNIT 2 775 SF

UNIT 3 775 SF

UNIT 4 748 SF

MUSIC / ART STUDIOS UNIT 5 1738 SF

UNIT 6 1705 SF

UNIT 7 1699 SF

UNIT 8 1505 SF

GAMING LOBBY 5374 SF MECHANICAL 604 SF

GROUND FLOOR FOUNDATION

HOTEL VALET PARKING 16,407 SF

MUSIC / ART STUDIOS UNIT 1 1084 SF

TOILET TOILET 494 SF 522 SF

34 35

POST-PRODUCTION 7263 SF ELEVATOR LOBBY 308 SF

LOWER LEVEL PLAN

VIP GAMING ROOM 2602 SF

GAMING VR ROOM 912 SF

HOTEL LINENS 286 SF

HOTEL LEVEL 4 501 309 SF

504 502 503 479 SF 306 SF 306 SF

505 325 SF

506 507 383 SF 385 SF

FIFTH FLOOR PLAN

510 512 508 509 511 385 SF 385 SF 385 SF 385 SF 300 SF

513 347 SF

HERRINGBONE HOUSE

The Herringbone House was the proposed solution for a mixed-use, multi-unit residential project in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn. Programming allowed for the creation of commercial spaces including offices and light fabrication, and called for studio, one, two and three bedroom dwelling units to be provided. The form was inspired by local, historic, brickwork coursing found while touring the neighborhood in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn. As the coursing was mainly attributed to historic residences, it would serve as the form for the residential portion of the building. Slices through the massing sought to connect the structure with parks and commercial hubs found in the neighborhood, allowing foot traffic pathways connecting these hubs through the project. The slice connecting the park spaces was utilized as the main circulation corridor for the residences; while the slice for the commercial connections was utilized for the commercial spaces within the project. The overall concept was to provide a mixed-use building that would serve as a live-work space on a larger scale. Building residents would be allowed space to create or conduct business in the sublevel spaces and/or sell their creations in the ground level shops. These spaces would also be open to residents within the local community, providing an economic connection between residents of the neighborhood. New York Institute of Technology Summer 2017

NIT

S RE

(B)

ITS

L CIA ER S MM CE CO SPA

R NO MI AZA PL

LY UE

EN AV

U EN AV

RLY

ER WAV

RLY

0’

N TIO ICA E BR FIC FA OF &

’ 90

50’

GR UE

R JO MA AZA PL

N NTO

CLI

N NTO

CLI

N NTO

NTO CLI

CLI

STUDIO (1) BR

SITE CONSTRAINTS

PARK CONNECTION

COMMERCIAL CONNECTION

AV EN UE

GR UE

NTO CLI

STAGGER

(A) (B) (A)

LY ER

NTO

SPLIT

NTO CLI

CLI

NTO CLI

UE UE

(3) BR

WAV

BURROW

(2) BR

PROGRAMMING

WAV

NTO CLI

PLAZA CARVING

STACK

REPLICATE

2 BR

1 BR

1 BR 3 BR

3 BR 1 BR

S S

1 BR 2 BR

SECOND & FOURTH FLOORS

SOUTH ELEVATION

GENERAL CANNABIS HEADQUARTERS

A Management Consulting Corporation in the Cannabis industry was looking for a refresh at their current corporate headquarters. Located in an existing bank building on the outskirts of Denver, the design team was tasked with creating corporate offices for multiple subsidiary groups. The subsidiary groups were as varied in their requirements as their skill-sets. The challenge was to create a cohesive design between the two existing floors, while also meeting the needs of the individual groups. The team was required to integrate secured finance spaces, multiple conference rooms, offices and open workspaces along with a prototype showroom space for partnering retailers used by the design team for the lifestyle brand company. Programming for four companies had to fit within the two ~10,000 SF plates. This meeting and showroom space was introduced as the main feature of the corporate headquarters; with an additional focus on the amazing fireplace that was a holdover from the original bank design. Project Team Sr. Project Manager: Project Architect: Junior Planner: Interior Designer:

Thomas Scotto Jr. Laura Lievano Tim Greening Stephanie Bias

LOUNGE

CONFERENCE

SHOWROOM

COLLABORATIVE WORKSPACE

DISPLAY WALL & SHELVING

CHIEFTON WORKSPACE

PRODUCT DISPLAYS

DISPLAY WALL

CHIEFTON OFFICE

KITCHEN & GUEST AREA LOBBY

FIRST FLOOR

IPG OFFICE

COLLABORATIVE WORKSPACE PANTRY

HR OFFICE

FINANCE WORKSPACE

IPG WORKSPACE

CONFERENCE

RECEPTION

FINANCE OFFICE

C FINANCE MOTHER’S OFFICE ROOM

GC OFFICE

FINANCE OFFICE

GC OFFICE GC WORKSPACE

FINANCE OFFICE

CONFERENCE

GC OFFICE

SECOND FLOOR B

G AT E WAY

At Manhattan’s southern tip, New York Harbor sits among an estuary; where the fresh water flowing from the Hudson River meets the salt-filled currents of the Atlantic Ocean. The River Project finds its home here. It is responsible for studying and monitoring aquatic life and water levels within the river and the harbor. The project brief called for the creation of an “Estuarium.” This would be a place of research and education with museum, aquarium, cafe and auditorium components. The major programming was divided into two equivalent cubes; the “living lab” for research and education in the southern cube and the cafe and aquarium spaces in the northern cube. The two cubes were split with a central atrium and indoor garden space. Pushed and pulled, the cubes were further differentiated by sinking the lab spaces into the river, enabling them to flood with the changing tides as if to act in place of a shoreline. The northern cube was allowed to grow upward, culminating in a space-frame glass enclosure highlighting the building’s presence to the community. New York Institute of Technology Spring 2017

1. WET LAB EDUCATION & COLLECTION 2. WET LAB, DISPLAY & STORAGE 3. DRY LAB, DISPLAY & STORAGE 4. SUBMERGED OBSERVATION ROOM 5. COURTYARD 6. CIRCULATION CORE #1 7. ATRIUM 8. AQUARIUM ENTRY 9. CIRCULATION CORE #2 10. RIVER WALK

8 7

4 2

GROUND FLOOR

SITE PLAN

1. ROOF DECK 2. AMPHITHEATER 3. COURTYARD 4. CIRCULATION CORE #1 5. AUDITORIUM 6. CONNECTION CORRIDOR 7. CIRCULATION CORE #2 8. AQUARIUM & MUSEUM EXHIBIT HALL 9. CIRCULATION RAMP 10. TECHNOLOGY CENTER 11. WOMEN’S TOILET 12. MEN’S TOILET 13. MECHANICAL ROOMS 14. CIRCULATION CORE #3 15. RIVER WALK

8 15

THIRD FLOOR

1. CAFE 2. AQUARIUM & MUSEUM EXHIBIT HALL 3. LOW LIGHT AQUARIUM EXHIBITS 4. CIRCULATION RAMP 5. TECHNOLOGY CENTER 6. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 7. ATRIUM & INDOOR GARDEN 8. AMPHITHEATER 9. ROOF DECK 10. WET LAB EDUCATION & COLLECTION

NORTHWEST SECTION

9 7

GRAPHIC DESIGN

CANNAROLLA STYLE GUIDE

Primary Logo

LOCKUPS

P I N N A C L E Logo Alterations Monochrome - Green

USAGE

White on Green

3.39”

.42”

.125” .175” (50%) .525” (150%)

.35” (100%) .125” .08”

P I N N A C L E

.08”

.28”

3.39” .125”

.35” (100%)

Monochrome - Slate

P I N N A C L E

White on Slate

P I N N A C L E

.35” (100%) .125” .08”

CANNAROLLA STYLE GUIDE COMPONENTS

STANDARD FONTS

Sans Icon - Slate

P I N N A C L E

Sans Icon - Green

P I N N A C L E

Linear

.08”

MODIFIED TYPEFACE FOR LOGO

ICONS

TITLES AND HEADERS

cannarolla CANNAROLLA

[Giorgio Regular]

BODY FONT(S) Calibri Light Lucida Bright

ICON VARIATIONS

BADGES

P I N N A C L E Icon - Primary

Icon - Alternates

PPT PPT

COLOR PALETTE

HEX: 231F20 R,G,B: 35,31,32 C,M,Y,K: 0,0,0,100

HEX: C7C457 R,G,B: 199,196,87 C,M,Y,K: 25,14,81,0

HEX: 58595B R,G,B: 88,89,91 C,M,Y,K: 0,0,0,80

Little T est. 2019

PV CANOPY

ROOF DECK LOBBY SECOND DECK

MAIN DECK

ZERO DECK

SECOND DECK

PATTERN FORMULATION

NYC

MAIN DECK

TERRACE SECOND DECK

ZERO DECK

POLYHEDRON

MIRROR

MIRROR GROUP

TERRACE

MAIN DECK

ROOF DECK

PV CANOPY SECONDSECOND DECK DECK MAIN DECK

CLOSE ARC

GRADE

= ZERO DECK

TERRACE

PV CANOPY

CARVED PATH MAIN DECK

ADD

ZERO DECK

ROOF DECK

SECOND DECK

ZERO DECK

DIAMOND PATTERN

MAIN DECK TERRACE

VOIDS ADDED

CARVED PATH

PV CANOPY

ZERO DECK ROOF DECK

I L L U S T R AT I O N

MODELING

43 57