Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway

RK HO LLOW RD MATSO N

RAMP RTE. 30E to RTE. 30W

RD

ORME RD ADAM

S VI

EW

LN

RO UTE 25 9

IDLEWILD

LN

RO

UTE

30

WILPEN RD

MALLARD LN

STEINHILPER CIR BRIG E LN

RD

AL ICIP MUN

AD

DEED S

NUTMEG LN

P RAM RTE. to 30W .

RTE 30E

DR

IRD

LN

LN

MEN

S RD PEOPLE

CAREY SCHO OL RD

N LN

GA

SPRINGER RD

DU

2ND

ST

DR

ELK

ER

OH

3RD

SSAY DR

LAKE

LN

RO

KALA

RRY LN STRAWBE

UTE 711

WAY

INGB

LN

SHYLOHS LN

30W to RT30E

LL RD

JOY LN

HUMM

JUNIPER

MCCARTNEY LN

Y HW

RAMP RT

EL HI GRAV

PARK

LN LINCO OLD

NT LN

GER

SIN

ST

WAL NU T ST

LTIC

RD

BA

HU

WK HA

AN DI LN

LN

OAKS

PINE

MO

LN

TALL TIMBER LINDE NWOO D DR

RUN RD

LN

MILE

TCH

TWO

WES

TVIE

MAIN ST

WD

R

IEW

OAKV

DR

DR

MEA

DO

W

Y LN FERR

D ST

FAIRFIEL

DR

SHAKER

DR

LN

HILLSIDE

AVE

OO

DS

LN

FR

AN

KL

IN

DR

EL LAUR

TAVE

S GREEGG LL B

PE

RR YW

LN

RB ES

N ST

WA MCGO

ST

FISH ER

LN WA

RT

FO

KE MAR

ST

UT

T ST

WARE DELA ST

BURD

NICELY RD

ST CLAIR CIR

DR

RA MPA

ST

GE YLED SUNN LN SUMMIT

DR

RM

EY FA

RD

KINS

MO

UN

PR

IN

GS

N LN

DS

LN

IN

RD

R

ED

TT LO

AR

CH

EV

ER

GR

EE

HIP

LN

ST

ASY FANT LN

BOUCHE

IN MA

LS

IEN

R LN

VIL

AN

LN

HI AC

RE DR

RD MP RA

MAN FREE

TA

R LN

STONE

CO O FR

LN YD BO

BRICKY ARD LN

VIE

E to

ILD

W

RT30

W DR

RT30 W

W

ILLO

W LN

OFF

BRID

GE

RN

SCEN

IC VIE

GALAXY LN

W LN PETE

LIER

BRAL

NSE

COBB

LEST ONE

T LN

ES

PE

LN

DR

SU

LN

RS RD

LN

LN WATTSWOOD

SATU

TE

RS

CR NA

LN

EE

GR

Y WOOLLEY LN HW LINCO FOX LN

LN

SADDLEBROOK LN

ELL

RD

BU

LN

MONT

OLD

EDGE

SUNRISE

RD

DO

RN

ICK

HIL

L LN

P JUMPER

N ASPE

LN

AS OM

RO

UT

E7

PALMER

11

STUM

LN

RD

TH

VISTA

DR

LN

MONT

EDGE

EA

RD

TS DR

PRESIDEN

PH

SA

NT

CIR

A LN ONEID

ING

STIRL HALL

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study

Y LN UR

RC

ME

MU

LBER

RY

LN

D LN

OO

BAYW ACH ECO

LN

STAG

VE

RS BUDDMA Y LN

NU

S LN

LN

ROLLING

S LN

ICA

ROCK LN

ER

Ligonier, PA D LN

WEI

MER

ERWOO

AVE

T

CA

RN IA AV

LIFO

ARMOUR ST

WOND

E

June 2011

ROCK

LN

LN WA UT

ING

LN

ROLL

FIS

H

Prepared by: GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 East Waterfront Drive Homestead, PA 15120-5005 412.476.2000

HA TC

HE

RY LN

NGER

SPRI BTM

HU

NTLA

ND

DO

WNS

B CLU TRY

UN

CO RD

LN

IL LN

HOLLY

TREE

LN

LN

LER RD

BYERS

LN

LN

LL RD

LONE STAR

WEAV ER MI

LN

HONEYS

LN

MIL JACOB

OW

AZALEA

LN

APPLE

LILAC

DAFFOD

SN

MA N

1

E 38

ROUT

RD

OFF WYC

RECTOR

UCKLE

GE LN

LN

ORAN

LE LN

RD

LINN RUN RD

N CAMP

MOUNTAI

M DA DREA

OLD LINN RUN RD

LAUREL

TULIP LN

LN

Prepared for: Ligonier Township Recreation Board One Municipal Drive Ligonier, PA 15658 724.238.2725

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study Ligonier, PA June 2011 Prepared by: GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 East Waterfront Drive Homestead, PA 15120-5005 412.476.2000

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT PARTNERS Ligonier Township, Ligonier Borough & Loyalhanna Watershed Association PROJECT FUNDED BY Richard King Mellon Foundation THE COMMUNITY Friends of the Ligonier Valley Trail Public Meeting Attendees

2 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

ADVISORY COMMITTEE Drew Banas – Loyalhanna Watershed Association Diane Cipa – The Closing Specialists Sharon Detar, Bob Gangawere, Bill Bright, Cathi Graham & Elizabeth McCall – Ligonier Township Recreation Board Richard Flickinger – Law Offices of Flickinger & Barr Paul Fry & Sam Banales – Ligonier Borough Barbara Golden Olga Herbert – Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor Michael Kuzemchak – Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Monty Murty – Trout Unlimited James Pillsbury, MS, PE – Westmoreland County Conservation District Bridget Shirey – Holy Trinity School Malcom Sias – Westmoreland County Parks & Roads/ Regional Trail Corporation Tracy Stack – DCNR Rose Stepnick – Project Manager Joshua Zakovitch – PennDot District 12

Table of Contents

Introduction .....................................................................................5 Section A: Project Context & Corridor Analysis ..............................9 Section B: Trail & Bikeway Alignment ...........................................21 B.1: North Route ...........................25 B.2: Town Route ...........................35 B.3: West Route ............................45 B.4: East Route .............................51 B.5: South Route ...........................55 B.6: Future Expansion ...................59 Section C: Bike Wayfinding & Signage ..........................................63 Section D: Budgeting & Construction ............................................69 Appendix ........................................................................................87

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 3

4 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Introduction

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 5

HISTORY OF THE LVTB The Ligonier Township Recreation Board was formed in 2001 as an advisory board to the Ligonier Township Supervisors.

In 2002, the Board discussed the concept of putting a hiking/biking trail in Ligonier Township that would benefit the recreation and health of the community. A public survey was conducted, and it received an overwhelming, positive response. Westmoreland County Parks and Recreation was contacted, which informed the Board that there was a lack of trails in eastern Westmoreland County.

In fact, the County’s trail masterplan did not include the Ligonier Valley.

In 2003, the Board looked at the health benefits of the trail concept and partnered with PATH of the Latrobe Area

6 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Hospital. By this time, more public interest was being shown by the general community of the Ligonier Valley, since the majority of bikers were packing up their bicycles and heading to other nearby trails in the region. The Board decided that there was a need to develop a trail for health and recreation opportunities, and also to promote the benefits of the Ligonier Valley. In 2004, the process of obtaining funding to conducte a feasibility study began.

The original goal of the Board was to develop a trail from Weller Field to Wilpen, the Loyalhanna Gorge, Fort Palmer, New Florence, and beyond.

This feasibility study is the culmination of a six-year effort to plan a trail network in the Ligonier Valley. For the development of the trail, it is only the beginning.

VISION A community project that continues a County, State, and National awareness of the need for public outdoor recreation while promoting “open space”, health benefits, economic enhancement, environmental and historical education and preservation.

GOALS To develop a Feasibility Study for Phase Two of the Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway to guide future design improvements and grant funding initiatives. This study will dramatically expand the existing Phase One trail network in all directions and connect residents and visitors to regional recreational, commercial, historical, and cultural amenities.

PROCESS • prepare base mapping to study potential trail alignments • evaluate existing conditions and constraints • identify a primary route for the trail, and alternate routings • identify property acquisition for the trail right-of-way • prepare planning level cost estimates, and construction schedules • determine regulatory approvals and permits

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT As part of the process, a public meeting was held at the Ligonier Township Municipal Building in Ligonier on Monday, December 6, 2010.

The evening was kicked off by David Kahley, CEO of the Progress Fund, who talked about the economic benefit of trail towns along the Great Allegheny Passage. He was followed by Todd Brant, Landscape Architecture Manager of GAI Consultants, who presented the preliminary findings of the feasibility study. The group engaged in a lively discussion following the presentations. Feedback from the community has been incorporated into this final report.

Above: Phase One of the Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Below: Public meeting held on December 6, 2010

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 7

Old Linc

oln High

NORTH: Township

way

WEST: Idlewild

271

711

30

Mill

ek

Cre

Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Cr

TOWN: Ligonier

ee

k

SOUTH: SAMA 30

711

EAST: Route 381

O

ld

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

PROJECT STUDY AREA The scope of this study is for Phase Two of the Ligonier Valley Trial & Bikeway. It builds upon Phase One, a half-mile section of shared-use trail constructed from the north shore of Mill Creek at Weller Field, north along a dedicated easement to the intersection with People Road.

This section of trail was built in fall 2010. The project study area is organized in the following five sections: • North Section – From the Phase One trail intersection at Peoples Road and ending at the Ligonier Township Municipal Building.

• Town Section – The limits of Ligonier Borough.

• West Section – From Ligonier Borough (intersection of West Main Street and Springer Road), along the Old Lincoln Highway Corridor paralleling Route 30, to Idlewild Park.

8 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

• East Section – From Ligonier Borough (intersection of Bell Street and East Main Street), along the Old Lincoln Highway Corridor paralleling Route 30, to the intersection with Route 381.

• South Section – From Ligonier Borough (intersection of Loyalhanna Street and South Market Street), along Route 711, to the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art on Boucher Lane.

In addition to Phase Two, future expansion and conceptual routings to the Ligonier Valley Railroad Museum/Loyalhanna Gorge (west), Laughlintown (east), and Linn Run State Park (south) are also included. This would potentially be Phase Three of the Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway.

SECTION A:

Project Context & Corridor Analysis

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 9

Wilpen

Youngstown

Ligonier

Laughlintown

Rector

CONTEXT The Ligonier Valley is located in Westmoreland County nestled in the mountains of the Laurel Highlands. The Valley is comprised of the Borough of Ligonier and Ligonier Township. The Township entirely surrounds, but does not include the Borough. Their combined population is roughly 8,700 according to the 2000 census.

Nearby municipalities include Latrobe and Youngstown about ten miles to the northwest, Wilpen to the northeast approximately four miles, Laughlintown three miles to the southeast, and Rector about five miles to the south.

Fort Ligonier was built by British forces in 1758 during the French and Indian War, and the town was later settled in 1817. The Borough was incorporated in 1834 followed by the Township in 1882.

10 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Mill

ek

Cre

Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Ligonier

Cr

ee

k

WATERWAYS Being situated in a valley, Ligonier is traversed by two significant water bodies. The Loyalhanna Creek adjoins with the Conemaugh River to form the Kiskiminetas River, and flows northwest from Ligonier towards Latrobe. Its flow is regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Latrobe Reservoir. Mill Creek generally flows in a west-southwest direction through the project study area towards its confluence with Loyalhanna Creek about one mile west of Ligonier. Both creeks are popular trout fishing destinations.

Mill Creek near Weller Field

Since waterways are also obstructions, it is important to note the bridges spanning them (red circles above). Loyalhanna Creek can be crossed at Peters Road, Route 711, Two Mile Run Road, and Clark Hollow Road. Mill Creek is bridged at Route 30, West Vincent Street, Route 711 at Peoples Road, and Route 711 at Brigade Lane.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 11

Old Linco

ln Highwa

y

Ligonier

O

ld

Li

nc

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

ROADWAYS: OLD LINCOLN HIGHWAY Conceived and promoted by entrepreneurs, the Lincoln Highway was the first road to span coast-to-coast across the United States. The roadway was completed in 1913, and brought economic prosperity to many towns along its length.

The Old Lincoln Highway parallels today’s Route 30 through the valley. The historic alignment can be experienced from about 300 feet west of the Route 30/381 intersection, along East and West Main Street in Ligonier Borough, to about 600 feet east of the Route 30/259 intersection.

The Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor (LHHC) owns a parcel at the Route 30/259 intersection west of Ligonier.

12 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

View of Old Lincoln Highway through Ligonier

Old Linco

ln Highwa

y

271

711

30

Ligonier

30

711

O

ld

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

ROADWAYS: CURRENT SYSTEM The current roadway network is comprised primarily of two-lane roads that interconnect towns and villages in the region. The street network within Ligonier Borough is a compact grid of two-lane neighborhood streets, some with on-street parking, and alleys.

Route 711 North near Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

Route 30 is the main east-west route, and is primarily a four-lane road. Approximately 1,000 feet east of its intersection with East Main Street, Route 30 transitions to two lanes. Route 711 is the primary north-south route, running from Seward through Ligonier (North and South Market Street within the Borough) and terminating in Connellsville. The Pennsylvania Turnpike (Interstate 70/76) can be accessed from Route 711 south of Ligonier at Donegal.

Route 381 is another main north-south route that intersects with Route 711 at Jones Mills near Donegal.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 13

Timberlinks GC Ligonier Twp Ligonier C&CC

Idlewild Park

Ligonier C&CC

High School

Country Market

Weller Field Ridgeview GC

Mellon Park Middle School

Ligonier Boro Fort Ligonier

SAMA

Ligonier Beach Laurel Valley GC

Compass Inn Linn Run SP Ligonier CC

DESTINATIONS The Ligonier Valley is unparalleled with the quantity and quality of recreational and cultural destinations for its size.

Recreational destinations include numerous golf courses and clubs (Timberlinks Golf Club, Ligonier Country Club, Laurel Valley Golf Club, and Ridgeview Golf Club), Idlewidld Park, Ligonier Camp & Conference Center, Ligonier Country Market, Mellon Park, Weller Field, YMCA, Ligonier Beach, and Linn Run State Park. The latter contains many recreational trails for all types of users. Several ski resorts are also nearby.

Fort Ligonier, Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art, Compass Inn, Ligonier Valley Library, and multiple schools are among some of the cultural destinations in the area.

14 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

The Diamond at the intersection of Market and Main Streets

Old Linco

ln Highwa

y

271

711

30

Mill

ek

Cre

Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Ligonier

Cr

ee

k

30

711

O

ld

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

COMPOSITE This map shows the inter-relationship of waterways, roadways, and destinations in the Ligonier Valley. The road network generally parallels Loyalhanna and Mill creeks and connects residents and visitors to the area’s recreational and cultural destinations.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 15

271

711

30

Ligonier

30

711

381

AERIAL IMAGE: VEGETATION This aerial image shows the general character of the vegetation within the Ligonier Valley. Natural, wooded areas and rural farm tracts are the dominant land cover in the region.

16 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Old Linc

oln High

way

271

711

30

Mill

ek

Cre

Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Ligonier

Cr

ee

k

30

711

O

ld

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

PROPERTY BOUNDARIES This map depicts the property boundaries within the project study area. Smaller tracts dominate the Borough of Ligonier, and larger parcels are prevalent in Ligonier Township.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 17

Old Linc

oln High

way

271

711

30

Mill

ek

Cre

Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Ligonier

Cr

ee

LEGEND

k

30

711

Cultural/Institutional Civic Utility Parks/Open Space

O

ld

Recreation LWA LC&CC Bethlen Homes

LAND USES This map shows the dominant land uses in Ligonier Valley including, but not limited to: • Cultural/Institutional - Fort Ligonier, Ligonier Valley Schools, Holy Trinity, Ligonier Valley Library, numerous places of worship, and the YMCA • Civic - include the Borough of Ligonier and Ligonier Township • Utility - Allegheny Power • Parks/Open Space - Mellon Park and The Diamond • Recreation - Timberlinks Golf Club, Idlewild Park, Weller Field, Laurel Valley Golf Club & Ligonier Beach Other large property owners within the project study area include the Loyalhanna Watershed Association, Ligonier Camp & Conference Center, and Bethlen Homes.

18 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

wa

y

LEGEND Cultural/Institutional

Bethlen Homes

Civic Utility Allegheny Power

Parks/Open Space

711

Recreation Weller Field

LWA

Stre et

High School

LC&CC

Nor th M ark et

Bethlen Homes

YMCA Holy Trinity Country Market

Library Mellon Park

West Main Street

30

Boro Bldg East Main Street

Fort Ligonier

Laurel Valley GC

LAND USES: TOWN This map shows the land uses within the Borough of Ligonier in more detail.

In addition the uses described on the previous page, people are attracted to many services that the town provides. These include a variety of retail, office, and restaurant destinations that are mainly situated along the pedestrian-friendly streets of West/East Main and North/ South Market. Other destinations for visitors include the Ramada Inn on West Loyalhanna and several small inns, cottages, and bed and breakfasts.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 19

20 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

SECTION B:

Trail & Bikeway Alignment

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 21

Old Linc

oln High

way

WEST (pg 45)

Ligonier Twp

Idlewild Park

NORTH (pg 25)

271

Phase One

Mill

ek

Cre

30 Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Cr

Ligonier TOWN (pg 35)

ee

k

SOUTH (page 55)

LEGEND

30

711

Cultural/Institutional Civic Utility

Laurel Valley GC

Parks/Open Space

O

ld

Recreation LWA LC&CC

EAST (pg 51)

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

Laughlintown

wa

y

Bethlen Homes

SYSTEM OVERVIEW The Phase Two study area of approximately 9.2 miles is organized into the five sections listed below. For each segment, a primary alignment is identified. Alternatives routes have been recommended for some of the sections.

• North Route – Approximately 1.4 miles from the Phase One trail intersection at Peoples Road, adjacent to the Route 711 corridor, and ending at the Ligonier Township Municipal Building.

• Town Route – Approximately 3.5 miles generally located within the limits of Ligonier Borough.

• West Route – Approximately 2.2 miles from Ligonier Borough near the Country Market (intersection of West Main and Springer), along the Old Lincoln Highway Corridor paralleling Route 30, and terminating at Idlewild Park.

22 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

• East Route – Approximately 1.6 miles from Ligonier Borough (intersection of Bell and East Main), along the Old Lincoln Highway Corridor paralleling Route 30, and ending at the intersection with Route 381.

• South Route – Approximately 0.5 miles from Ligonier Borough (intersection of Loyalhanna and South Market), along Route 711, and ending at the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art on Boucher Lane.

The main focus of this report is to provide continuity to existing trail and bicycle route facilities, and connect the community to high-demand uses in the area as economically as possible. To that end, an emphasis has been placed on locating the proposed route within existing public rights-of-way to limit the amount of initial property acquisition and cost.

LEGEND On-Road Route Shared-Use Path

E PEOPL

Alternate Route SSAY

S RD

KALA

DR

ile)

WA LNU T

2m

1/ e(

n

eO

as

ST

Ph

Baltic Road Trailhead (pg 32)

D IC R

LT

BA

L TCH HU

K AW OH

LN

PINE

N

M

WE

Mill Creek Trailhead (pg 43)

ST V

Mi

IEW

ll C

re

OAKS

DR

ek

Weller Field 711

FER

T FIELD S

RA MP AR

N

L RY

FAIR

F OR B

T

DR

ST

RE AWA

NS OWA MCG

ES

DEL

BURD

T

ET S

RK MA

ER DR

SHAK

ST

HILLSIDE

PHASE ONE SECTION

AVE

The existing Phase One shared-use path stretches from the east shore of Mill Creek at Weller field through a dedicated easement northeast approximately a half-mile DR to its REL GSTAVE U G E A R L G EL intersection with Peoples Road. This section,L completed in B fall 2010, is approximately 10 feet wide and has a comFR pacted, crushed stone surface. The off-road trail is virtuAN KL IN ally flat, thus universally accessible by users of all ages ST and abilities.

10’ min

Typical section through existing Phase One shared-use path

A trailhead exists on either end of this section of path.

The Mill Creek Trailhead lies on the southern end across Mill Creek, and the Baltic Road Trailhead is on the northern end. A railroad bridge once existed where the trail inR MIT D tersects with Mill Creek. The bridge abutments remain in SUM place, and a new trail bridge is needed to connect Phase D MR FAR the southern shore of Mill Creek.

Y One to all points Ibeyond E NS K

MO

UN

STON

GS

NL

L

ST

FA

D

IN

TA IN

R

D — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 23 Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study E

TT LO AR

N

PR

IEN

IN MA

LS

FR

N

CO O

LN

L YD BO

ER LN

H

DR

TL

N

LN

Above: Completed Phase One section of shared-use path Below: Phase One section during construction

24 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Paving a portion of the Phase One section

SECTION B.1:

North Route

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 25

LEGEND

ADA MS

VIEW

LN

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Ligonier Twp

Culvert

STEINHILPER CIR

MU L IPA NIC DR

MIN GBIR D LN

HU TCH

LN

OAKS

LN

LN

IEW

DR

TALL TIMBER DR

DR

ST V

ST CLAIR CIR

AD

RA MP AR

N

L RY

711

FER

Weller FA Field

DR

OOD

WE

ME ST IRFIELD

IEW

V OAK

ENW

LIND

PINE

OW

DR

TL

N

F ES DR

ST

RE AWA

DEL

OR B

BURD

N ST OWA MCG

ER DR

SHAK

ST

HILLSIDE

AVE

NORTH ROUTE: PRIMARY ALIGNMENT

DR

REL

GSTAVE GREEG LL B

LAU

The proposed North Route begins at the end of the Phase 1 trail at Peoples Road, extends northeast, and ends at the Ligonier Township Municipal Building. This section is approximately 1.4 miles in length. Two phases are proposed: Phase 2.1 and 2.7 (see above).

FR

AN

KL

IN

ST

IT DR

SUMM

RD

The route travels in an easement behind private parcels for roughly 0.2 miles. It then travels for about 0.7 miles through Ligonier Camp & Conference Center, mainly paralleling Route 711 (culverts will be required to cross several water courses in this section). At the road bridge, the route travels 0.1 miles (500 feet) along the southbound lane of Route 711, separated by a Jersey barrier, until it reaches the intersection of Shylohs Lane. The route then travels on private parcels (easements will be required) for 0.3 miles until it reaches the Municipal Building site.

M FAR

SEY

KIN

MO

UN

STON

IN

GS LN PL N

NL

ER

GR

EE

HI

RD

TT LO

AR

CH

EV

TASY FAN

DS

ST

IEN

TA IN

R ED

N

FR

PR

IN MA

LS

N

CO O

LN

L YD BO

ER LN

LN

VIL

AN

LN

HI A CRE

DR

Area of Ligonier Camp & Conference Center property where the trail is to be located (Route 711 is to the right)

MP RA

0E

VIE ILD

W

RT3

W

to R

DR

T30

W

OW ILL

W LN

OF

FBR

IDG

EL

N

GALAXY LN

BRA SU

LN WATTSWOOD

UR SAT

NS

ET

LN

PETE

26 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania RS R

D

ES

PE

TE

EN

RS

E GR

R AC

LN

W

OLD

EM EDG

RD

R

RD

LLIE

N NL

Y WA

RD

JOY LN

HU M

LN

ST

WK HA

MO

L HIL VEL GRA

K PAR

EL K

UT

Mi

RD

Mill Creek Trailhead (pg 43)

ST

R LN

k

ee

Potential Dog Run Location

T RKE MA

JUNIPE

Phase 2.1 r ll C

Phase 1

Phase 2.2 & 2.3

LN

LN

WA LN

LTIC

BA

HER

NO

BERRY STRAW

Phase 1 Baltic Road Trailhead (pg 32)

Phase 2.7

GER

SIN

ES RD

DR

711

SHYLOHS LN

Phase 2.1

ME

PEOPL

SSAY

711

Ball Field

ROUTE

Bethlen Homes

EL N

Soccer Fields

MCCARTNEY LN

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

BRIG AD

Municipal Bldg Trailhead (pg 33)

NUTMEG LN

KALA

WILPEN RD

MALLARD LN

Alternate Route

R

ED

LAK

LEGEND On-Road Route

WILPEN RD

Shared-Use Path

MALLARD LN

Alternate Route Culvert

CIR Ligonier Twp

IAN

Alternate Alignment 1

N OL

LN

L IPA NIC MU

AD E

711

RD

D LN

GBIR

R LN

Ball Field

Y WA

MIN

JUNIPE

Pond Alternate Alignment 2

ER

G SIN

ILL

N

Primary Alignment

HUM

MCCARTNEY LN

JOY L

EL H

DR

V GRA

K PAR

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

DID

BRI G

Municipal Bldg Trailhead (pg 33)

R

ED

LAK

MCKELV

Primary Alternate Route

LN

M

LN

LN

BERRY

ER

H ENO

ELK

E 711 Phase 2.7

ROUT

STRAW

SHYLOHS LN

Phase 2.1

NORTH ROUTE: ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT Two potential routing alternatives, both in Phase 2.7, have been identified for the North Route.

IEW

V OAK

Alternate 1 begins at the intersection of Route 711 and Brigade Lane, heads north on Brigade Lane, and ends at the Municipal Building Trailhead. This section is approximately 0.4 miles in length, and would replace 0.3 miles of the primary alignment. Alternate 2 initially takes the same route as the first alternative but makes a right off Brigade lane past the third lot then meets up with the primary alignment.

DR

LL TIMBER DR ST CLAIR CIR

Aerial image showing both primary (orange: shared-route path) and alternatives (brown: on-road/shared-route combination) alignments to reach the Municipal Building Trailhead

Brigade Lane is a private road, therefore an easement will be required for either of these route options. The benefit of these alternatives is a reduced trail length on Route 711, a busy thoroughfare, by about 300 feet.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 27

Soccer Field

o water c

ter wa

se

urse

rse cou

easement

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

ur

e

rs

o rc

e

at

r

e at

w

Culvert

w

Soccer Field

e

urs

o rc

te

wa

Culverts

Shared-Use Path

Golden Property

u co

th

e Us

Pa

d-

re

Culvert Accessible Trail Culvert

Existing Kiosk

Existing Parking

te

u Ro

a Sh

1 71

Wooded Area

d

oa

sR

le op

Pe

NORTH ROUTE: LC&CC SOCCER FIELDS The plan above shows a potential Phase 2.1 shared-use path alignment from behind the Golden property to the existing parking lot for the Ligonier Camp & Conference Center soccer fields. The route then parallels Route 711 on its way north towards the Ligonier Township Municipal Building.

An easement at the northeast corner of the Golden property will be needed for proper trail alignment in addition to an easement or agreement with the Ligonier Camp & Conference Center for use of their property. The area directly east of the Golden property is traversed by two water courses that would be crossed utilizing pipe culverts.

At least three additional culverts will be needed for the section adjacent to Route 711.

28 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Aerial image of Golden property and soccer field area on Ligonier Camp & Conference Center property

Macartney Lane

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

d-Use

Share

water course d-Use

Share

Accessible Trail

Path

Existing Sign

Remove Existing Tree

Path

1 te 71

Rou

Wooded Area

NORTH ROUTE: LC&CC ENTRY The plan above shows a potential Phase 2.1 shared-use path alignment crossing Macartney Lane on the Ligonier Camp & Conference Center property along Route 711. To clear an existing sign, the proposed trail is located approximately 50 feet back from Route 711. An existing tree on the western side of Macartney Lane, between the trail and Route 711, will have to be removed to provide adequate visibility for both trail users and motorists.

Aerial image showing proposed shared-use path alignment at intersection of Route 711 and Macartney Lane

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 29

Ball Field

wate r cou rse

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

Wooded Area

Phase 2.1 Terminus

Accessible Trail

Use

dhare

Phase 2.7

Path

S

1 te 71

Rou

NORTH ROUTE: LC&CC BALL FIELD The plan above shows a potential Phase 2.1 shared-use path alignment at the ball field on the Ligonier Camp & Conference Center property along Route 711. The Phase 2.1 section of the route would terminate just west of an existing water course and grove of trees. Phase 2.7 would extend the trail to the Municipal Building Trailhead.

Aerial image of temporary Phase 2.1 trail terminus at ball field on Ligonier Camp & Conference Center property

30 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

existing shoulder

10’ min

shift travel lanes slightly to accommodate shared-use path 42” high barrier

NORTH ROUTE: ROUTE 711 BRIDGE

shoulder

Top: Existing photo of Route 711 at Brigade Lane looking south Middle: Proposed Route 711 section illustrating Option 1 Bottom: Existing Route 711 section at bridge just south of Brigade Lane

For about 0.1 miles, or 500 feet, the route in Phase 2.7 travels along the southbound lane of Route 711. The existing road condition includes two travel lanes with wide shoulders on both sides. There are three options for extending the route north, which should be explored in further detail during the implementation phase.

Option 1 shifts the existing travel lanes south to accommodate a shared-use path along the southbound side of the road with a minimum 42-inch high barrier (as per AASHTO) until it reaches the Shylohs Lane intersection.

Option 2 is to designate that section of Route 711 as a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) route. Option 3 is to construct a new trail bridge, independent of the Route 711 bridge, that connects Ligonier Camp & Conference Center to Brigade Lane and Alternative Alignment 2.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 31

water course

Crosswalk les Peop d Roa

th

e Us

Pa

d-

are

Sh

Lawn d

oa

Kiosk Accessible Trail Wooded Area

ic R

lt Ba

Parking Rain Garden

NORTH ROUTE: BALTIC ROAD TRAILHEAD The Baltic Road Trailhead, included Phase 2.1, is on an approximately 0.7 acre parcel that was gifted to Ligonier Township in 2010. The property is currently mostly wooded in character and contains a water course at its eastern end. The trailhead program includes: • • • • •

16-car pervious parking lot including 1 van accessible space accessible walkway connections from the parking area to the existing Phase One shared-use path a pavilion and/or information kiosk small lawn areas for picnicking landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

32 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Existing conditions of the Baltic Road Trailhead area

Mill Creek

Wooded Area

Shared-Use Path

Accessible Trail Ligonier Township Municipal Building

Existing Nature Trail Existing Parking

Municip

al Drive

Kiosk

NORTH ROUTE: MUNICIPAL BUILDING TRAILHEAD - OPTION 1 The Municipal Building Trailhead, included in Phase 2.7, is on the site of the existing Township Municipal Building off Route 711 adjacent to Mill Creek. In Option 1, The accessible, shared-use path is extended from the existing Nature Trail to the existing parking spaces near the building’s front entrance. The trailhead program includes: • • Existing conditions of the Municipal Building Trailhead area

• •

utilizes existing parking lot with accessible spaces (designate 10 spaces for dedicated trail parking) accessible shared-use path connection from the parking area to the existing Nature Trail a pavilion and/or information kiosk landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 33

Mill Creek

Kiosk

Existing Parking

Wooded Area

Shared-Use Path

Accessible Trail

Ligonier Township Municipal Building

Municip

al Drive

Existing Nature Trail

NORTH ROUTE: MUNICIPAL BUILDING TRAILHEAD - OPTION 2 The Municipal Building Trailhead, included in Phase 2.7, is on the site of the existing Township Municipal Building off Route 711 adjacent to Mill Creek. In Option 2, The accessible, shared-use path is extended from the existing Nature Trail to the existing parking spaces near the back of the building. The trailhead program includes: • • • •

utilizes existing parking lot with accessible spaces (designate 10 spaces for dedicated trail parking) accessible shared-use path connection from the parking area to the existing Nature Trail a pavilion and/or information kiosk landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

34 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Existing conditions of the Municipal Building Trailhead area

SECTION B.2:

Town Route

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 35

ool

Ka st ne rS t

St W al nu t

Phase 1

Bu

ng

er

Holy Trinity

St

St

BE SD R

ER DR

SHAK

Fa irfi

el d

HILLSIDE

AVE

FR

AN

KL

IN

DR

REL

GSTAVE GREEG LL B

LAU

ST

Middle School

GE

ED NYL

SUN LN

a

Fort Ligonier

DR

RA MP A

N ST

OWA

MCG

Library Lot ur Trailhead ch St

Phase 2.3 Lo ya Phase 2.6 lh an n

IEW

FO R

T

ET S

Ch

LN

ST V

711

ST

N

DS

WE

D ST

RE AWA DEL ST

RL

OO

PINE

ek

M

FAIRFIEL

BURD

HE

FIS

PE

RR YW

LN

Weller Field

RK MA

St

Cr

ill

Mill Creek Trailhead (pg 43)

ilro

ad

WK HA

MO

e

Phase 2.2, 2.3 & 2.9

Ra

T

TS

NU

L WA

RD

LN RY FER

Mellon Park

LTIC

BA

Bethlen Homes

St

St

ek NICELY RD

Carey S ch

Spr inge r Rd

N

AN DI L

n

re

RD

ai

aC

Mill Creek Trailhead

Phase 2.3

M

nn

ES PEOPL

lha

W

DR

LN

ya

ST

Country Market Trailhead (pg 48) Phase 2.3

MAIN ST

Phase 2.4

SSAY

Boquet

Lo

2ND

KALA ST

TCH HU

30

Phase 2.4

3RD

ST

Hwy

High School

WA LNU T

Old Lincoln

Country Market

CAREY SC HOOL RD

SPRINGER RD

Loyalhanna Watershed Assoc

St

IT DR

Phase 2.3

SUMM

Phase 2.5

RD

M FAR

SEY

KIN

ld

O

LEGEND 711

Li N

EE

GR ER EV

FR

ILD VIE W

to R

DR

W

T30

OW ILL LN

OF

FBR

GALAXY LN PETE

RS R

D

NS

TE

RS

EMO EDG

CR NA

LN

LN

EE

GR RD

ELL

D

BU

NT R

LN

SADDLEBROOK LN

PALMER

11

ET

ES

LN

E7

N

SU

PE

E SUNRIS

UT

EL

LN WATTSWOOD

U SAT

LN

RO

IDG

N

L RN

W LN

Designated north-south bikeway streets include Boquet, Fairfield, Kastner, Walnut, West Vincent, Springer, Ramsey, and Bell. East-west streets include Bunger, West Main, Railroad, Loyalhanna, Church, and the Old Lincoln Highway. A portion of shared-use path is proposed on Allegheny Power property (an easement is required) connecting the Mill Creek Trailhead to Kastner Street.

W

0E

TON E

DR

RT3

LES

HI A CRE

W

COB B

LN

MP RA

IC VIE

RD

RD

The proposed Town Route is the “hub” for the entire trail and bikeway network - from town, users can travel in all directions. This section is approximately 3.5 miles in length, and is comprised almost entirely of on-road routes within public rights-of-way designated by shared lane pavement markings, or sharrows (see page 64). Three phases are proposed: Phase 2.2 (bridge over Mill Creek), Phase 2.3 (on-road routes), Phase 2.9 (shared-use paths).

SCEN

N

TOWN ROUTE: PRIMARY ALIGNMENT

HI

E TT LO

TA IN

DR

AR

CH

ST

VIL

AN

AN EEM

GS LN PL N

y

LN

HER LN

IN

DS

Hw

BOUC

IN MA

PR

IEN

LN

L YD BO

n

LS

FR TASY FAN

Culvert

ER STON

CO O

Laurel Valley Golf Club

UN

ol

BRICKY ARD LN

Alternate Route

MO

nc

30

Shared-Use Path

NL

On-Road Route

An example of an on-road route designated with a shared lane pavement marking, or sharrow (see page 64)

DR

RD

N IDA L

ONE

EDGEM ONT

TS DR

PRESIDEN

36 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

STUMP

JUMPER

LN

LING

STIR H

C A RE Y S C H

SPRINGER RD

3RD ST

ST

Spr inge r Rd

2ND

Bethlen Homes

t

Bu

St

Al ce

Weller Field

Di

Alternate Alignment 2

Holy Trinity 30

le y

t

Alternate Alignment 1

tS

St

W al nu

n

St

M

ai

Mill Creek Trailhead (pg 43) Boquet

ng

Allegheny Power

Ka st ne rS t

S cent

Primary Alignment (Phase 2.9) er

W

DR

Mill Creek

W Vin

Country Market Trailhead (pg 48)

MAIN ST

SSAY

WA LNU T

OOL RD

High School

KALA

ST

Primary Alignment LD ST FAIRFIE

Mellon Park

BURD

St

ST

d el irfi Fa

na Cr

Lo

ee

ya

k

OO

DS

Shared-Use Path

ur

ch

an

na

PE

711

Ch

lh

St

LN

ST

LEGEND

T

NS OWA MCG

On-Road Route

an

lh

ya

Lo

St

RE AWA

ad

YMCA

RR YW

DEL

ilro

NU

L WA

T

ET S

RK MA

Ra

T TS

Alternate Route St

Culvert

GR

TOWN ROUTE: ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT Two potential routing alternatives, both in Phase 2.3, have been identified for the Town Route.

FR

AN

KL

IN

ST

LN

Aerial image showing both primary (orange & red) and alternaBRICK tive (brown) alignments Y

ARD L

N

Alternate 2 begins at the Mill Creek Trailhead, continues south along a dedicated easement, turns left onto Ligonier Borough property (south of the ball fields), then turns right onto Dice Alley. This section is approximately 0.2 miles in length, and would replace 0.3 miles of the priCO mary alignment.

FR

SP

N

GS LN PL N

EN

ER G

RE

HI

EV

LN

HER L

TASY FAN

BOUC

RIN

DS

VIL

AN

LN

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 37

N MA

REE

RD

ST

IEN

E

STON

IN MA

OL

LN

GE

ED NYL

SUN

Alternate 1 begins at the Mill Creek Trailhead, continues south along a dedicated easement, then continues on Allegheny Power property (an easement will be required) until it reaches Kastner Street to the west. This section is approximately 0.2 miles in length, and would replace 0.2 miles of the primary alignment.

Bunger Street at North Dice Alley looking west

North Fairfield Street at Bunger Street looking north

Kastner Street looking north

West Vincent Street at Indian Street looking north

North Walnut Street near North Vincent Street looking north

West Main Street at North Walnut Street looking west

38 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Railroad Street at South Walnut looking east

West Loyalhanna Street at South Grant Street looking east

East Loyalhanna Street at Marker Street looking west

East Church Street at Marker Street looking west

Bell Street at Bank Alley looking south

Old Lincoln Highway East near Bell Street looking east

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 39

Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities

Shared Travel Lane

D1-1b (R)

Shared Travel Lane Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities

Page 9B-10

D1-1b (L)

D1-1c

D4-3

D11-1

M1-8

D4-3

D11-1

M4-13

M7-1

2003 Edition

D1-1b (R)

D1-1b (L)

M1-9

M7-2

D1-1c

M4-11

M7-3

M4-12

M7-4 M1-9

M7-5 M4-11

M7-6 M4-12

M1-8

M7-7 M4-13

M7-1

Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9)

TOWN ROUTE: BUNGER STREET

Option: To establish a unique identification (route designation) for a State or local bicycle route, M7-2 M7-3 M7-4 M7-5 the Bicycle Route M7-6 M7-7 (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used.

Standard: The Bicycle Route sign shall contain a route designation and shall have a green background with a retroreflectorized white legend and border.

Option: Bicycle Signs (M1-8, Where a designatedSection bicycle 9B.20 route extends forRoute long distances throughM1-9) two or more States, a coordinated submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent Option: to the American Association State Highway Transportation Officials (see Page for theoraddress).

Toofestablish a uniqueand identification (route designation) for ai State local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route Standard: (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used.

The Interstate Bicycle Route (M1-9) sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain the assigned route number Standard: designation and have a black border retroreflectorized white background.

The legend Bicycleand Route sign with shall acontain a route designation and shall have a green background with a Guidance: retroreflectorized white legend and border.

If used, the BicycleOption: Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be placed at intervals frequent enough to keep bicyclists informed ofWhere changes in route direction remind for motorists of the presence bicyclists. a designated bicycle and routetoextends long distances throughoftwo or more States, a coordinated submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent Sect. 9B.20 to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (see Page i for the address).

Standard: The Interstate Bicycle Route (M1-9) sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain the assigned route number designation and have a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized white background.

Guidance: If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be placed at intervals frequent enough to keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists.

Sect. 9B.20

A portion of the Town Route travels along Bunger Street where the existing road condition consists of two travel lanes. The proposed primary alignment is a shared travel lane in either direction along Bunger Street that would be designated by a sharrow and signage.

Existing condition on Bunger Street showing two travel lanes

40 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Shared Travel Lane

Shared Travel Lane

2003 Edition

Pa

Figure 9B-3. Warning Signs for Bicycle Facilities (Sheet 2 of 2)

W11-1

W11-1

W11-1

W16-7p

W11-2

W16-1

OR

W12-2

W15-1

Section 9B.18 Other Bicycle Warning Signs

Option: Other bicycle warning signs (see Figure 9B-3) such as BIKEWAY NARROWS (W5-4a) and Hill (W7may be installed on bicycle facilities to warn bicyclists of conditions not readily apparent.

In situations where there is a need to warn motorists to watch for bicyclists traveling along the highwa SHARE THE ROAD (W16-1) plaque (see Figure 9B-3) may be used in conjunction with the W11-1 sign.

Guidance: If used, other advance bicycle warning signs should be installed no less than 15 m (50 ft) in advance o beginning of the condition.

Where temporary traffic control zones are present on bikeways, appropriate signs from Part 6 should b Option: Other warning signs described in Chapter 2C may be installed on bicycle facilities as appropriate.

Section 9B.19 Bicycle Route Guide Signs (D11-1)

Guidance: If used, Bicycle Route Guide (D11-1) signs (see Figure 9B-4) should be provided at decision points al designated bicycle routes, including signs to inform bicyclists of bicycle route direction changes and confirmation signs for route direction, distance, and destination.

If used, Bicycle Route Guide signs should be repeated at regular intervals so that bicyclists entering fr side streets will have an opportunity to know that they are on a bicycle route. Similar guide signing should used for shared roadways with intermediate signs placed for bicyclist guidance.

Support: Figure 9B-5 shows an example of the signing for the beginning and end of a designated bicycle route o shared-use path. Figure 9B-6 shows an example of signing for an on-roadway bicycle route. Figure 9B-7 examples of signing and markings for shared-use paths.

TOWN ROUTE: WEST MAIN STREET

A portion of the Town Route travels along West Main Street where the existing road condition consists of two travel lanes and on-street parking on either side. The proposed primary alignment is a shared travel lane in either direction along West Main Street that would be designated by a sharrow and signage.

Existing condition on West Main Street showing two travel lanes and on-street parking on either side

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 41

Sect. 9B.1

Shared Travel Lane

Shared Travel Lane

Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities D1-1b (R)

D1-1b (R) D1-1b (L)

D1-1c

D4-3

D11-1

M1-8

D1-1b (L)

M1-9

M4-11

M4-12

D1-1c

M4-13

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M4-11

M7-6

M7-2

D11-1

M1-8

M4-12

M4-13

M7-1

M7-1

M1-9

M7-2

D4-3

M7-7

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M7-6

M7-7

Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9)

TOWN ROUTE: WALNUT STREET

Option: To establish a unique identification (route designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used.

Option: Standard: To have establish a unique identification designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route The Bicycle Route sign shall contain a route designation and shall a green background with (route a (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used. retroreflectorized white legend and border.

Standard: Option: shall contain a route designation and shall have a green background with a Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances throughThe twoBicycle or moreRoute States,sign a coordinated retroreflectorized white legend and submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation mayborder. be sent to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Option: (see Page i for the address).

Standard: Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances through two or more States, a coordinated submittal by the an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent The Interstate Bicycle Route (M1-9) sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain theaffected assignedStates routefor number to the American of State Highway and Transportation Officials (see Page i for the address). designation and have a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized whiteAssociation background.

Standard: Guidance: Theplaced Interstate Bicycle Route enough (M1-9) to sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain the assigned route number If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be at intervals frequent a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized white background. keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to reminddesignation motorists ofand the have presence of bicyclists.

Guidance: Sect. 9B.20 If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be placed at intervals frequent enough to keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists.

Sect. 9B.20

A portion of the Town Route travels along North and South Walnut Street where the existing road condition consists of two travel lanes and sporadic on-street parking. The proposed primary alignment is a shared travel lane in either direction along North and South Walnut Street that would be designated by a sharrow and signage.

Existing condition on Walnut Street showing two travel lanes

42 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Wooded Area

Mi

Shared-Use Path (Phase 2.9)

ek re ll C se

-U red

Wooded Area

Sha

Ramp Accessible Trail Designated Trail Parking

h

se d-U

Kiosk

Pat

re

Sha

Allegheny Power

h

Pat

Bridge (Phase 2.2)

Rain Garden

Additional Parking

ath

-Use P

Shared

Ball Fields

t St

Boque

The Village at Ligonier

Existing Parking

Weller Field

TOWN ROUTE: MILL CREEK TRAILHEAD The Mill Creek Trailhead, included in Phase 2.3, is located on the south shore of Mill Creek North of Weller Field. The property is currently used as a gravel parking area. The trailhead program includes: •

•

Existing conditions of the Mill Creek Trailhead area

• • •

52-car pervious parking lot including 2 van accessible spaces (designate 14 spaces for dedicated trail parking) accessible walkway connections from the parking area to the proposed shared-use path and trail bridge over Mill Creek ramp with landings from bridge to accessible trail a pavilion and/or information kiosk landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 43

44 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

SECTION B.3:

West Route

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 45

MATS ON R D

LEGEND

MP RTRA to E.RT30 E 30WE.

ORME RD

On-Road Route

LHHC

RO UT E

Loyalhann

Alternate Route

25 9

IDLEWILD

Shared-Use Path

LHHC Trailhead (pg 50)

LN

RO

UT

Culvert

E3

0

LWA

a Creek

DEED S RD

MP RA RTE. 30RTWE.to 30E OLD OLN LINC

30

HW Y

Potential Dog Run Location LWA

30W RAMP RT

Potential Dog Run Location

to RT30E

Ice Pond

High School (pg 48)

LN DI AN

Phase 2.3 Country Market Trailhead (pg 49) Phase 2.3

NICELY RD T

TS

NU

L WA

N

RL

HE

FIS

PE

RR YW

OO

DS

LN

GE

ED NYL

SUN LN

The on-road route travels in the public right-of-way on Old Lincoln Highway from the Country Market Trailhead for approximately 1.6 miles. It then transitions to a shared-use path and travels for about 0.2 miles in public right-of-way, on private property, and property owned by the Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor (easements will be required). A new trail bridge is proposed to cross an existing water course. From there, the route travels 0.1 miles (500 feet) south across both westbound and eastbound lanes of Route 30 until it reaches Idlewild Lane.

ST

Country Market

MAIN ST

The proposed West Route begins at the end of Phase 2.3 at Mill Creek, extends northwest, and ends at Idlewild Park. This section is approximately 2.2 miles in length.

Two phases are proposed: Phase 2.4 (on-road routes) and Phase 2.8 (shared-use paths).

ST

Phase 2.4

Phase 2.4

WEST ROUTE: PRIMARY ALIGNMENT

2ND

UT

RUN RD

Potential Dog Run Location

K ST

WA LN

MILE

3RD

HOOL RD

TWO

Loyalhanna Watershed Assoc

CAREY SC

N

NL

GA

SPRINGER RD

DU

Ligonier Camp & Conference Center

BRICKY ARD LN

Aerial image showing the primary (orange & red) alignment at BOUC the LHHC site HER LN

46 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

SCEN

IC VIE

W LN

D

NR

EMA

FRE

MATS ON R D

Timberlinks Golf Course

259

RRTEA.M30P to RTE. E 30W

D ORME R

30

LHHC

LHCC Trailhead (pg 50)

Idlewild Park

R

Primary Alignment

OU TE 2 59

IDLEWIL

D LN ROUT

E3

0 LWA Alternate Alignment 1

Lo

ya

lha

nn

aC

re

ek

Shared-Use Path

P RRATM E. to 3R0W TE. 30E

S RD

On-Road Route

DEED

LEGEND

OLD

Alternate Route

OLN LINC

Culvert

HW

Y

WEST ROUTE: ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT

AN

G DU

One potential routing alternative has been identified for the West Route. Alternate 1 begins at a service drive along the Old Lincoln Highway, heads south across Route westbound Route 30, travels west through Loyalhanna WaterT30E parallels to Rand shed Association (LWA) property, turns30Wleft RAMP RT Route 259, and ends at the Idlewild Road after crossing eastbound Route 30. This section is approximately 0.3 miles in length, and would replace 0.3 miles of the primary alignment.

LN

Aerial image showing both primary (orange & red) and alternative (brown) alignments

All portions of this alternative alignment would be a shared-use path. Easements will be required through several parcels for this route option to become a reality. The benefit of this alternative is that it eliminates the need to climb a steeper portion of the primary alignment. This section could be built in addition to the main route.

T WO

MILE

RUN R

D

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 47

High School Existing Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk Existing Parking

Ball Field Proposed Sidewalk

Carey Sch

ool Road

Existing Parking

ath eP

r Ro

American Legion

-Us

inge

red

Spr

Sha

wa

ter

co

urs

e

ad

Accessible Trail

Valley Youth Network

Existing Parking

Use

dhare

Path

S

Mill

ek

Cre

WEST ROUTE: LIGONIER VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL The plan above shows a potential Phase 2.8 shareduse path alignment that connects Carey School Road to Springer Road, and provides an alternate route to the Country Market. Easements will be required on two private parcels, the American Legion and Valley Youth Netowrk properties. The trail is aligned in order to not limit development on either parcel.

A connection from Ligonier Valley High School to the shared-use path is provided at the northern property line of the Valley Youth Network parcel. A new sidewalk is proposed from the school’s main entrance to the existing parking area south of the ball field where it connects to the trail.

48 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Aerial image of the Ligonier Valley High School area

Old

Linc

oln

Hw

y

ger R d Sprin

Country Market

Sha redUse Path

Wooded Area

Pavilion/Kiosk

O

n-

R

Parking

oa

dw

ay

Tr a

R

ou

te

il Rain Garden

On-Ro Crosswalk

ain

WM

Accessible Trail

adway

Route

St

k

Crosswalk

Ro

ut

e

ree

lC

Mil

30

WEST ROUTE: COUNTRY MARKET TRAILHEAD The Country Market Trailhead is located on a parcel that is controlled by the LWA, who is proposing to create a multi-purpose trail, including landscaping improvements, in the area between the existing parking area and West Main Street/Old Lincoln Highway. The trailhead program includes: • • Existing conditions of the Country Market Trailhead area

• •

utilizes existing parking lot at Country Market (designate 10 spaces for dedicated trail parking) accessible walkway connections from the existing parking area to the proposed shared-use path a pavilion and/or information kiosk (proposed by LWA) landscaped areas with native plants (proposed by LWA)

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 49

Wooded Area

LHHC

Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor 25

9

Parking

ri

h Pat ay) Useght-of-w

Existing Parking

Driveway

ed-

r H Shaoric OL t (his

Existing Sculpture

Private Parcel

Trail Bridge

Rain Garden wate r cou rse

30

Ro

ute

u te

Ro

Accessible Trail

Sh

ar

ed

-U

se

Pa

th

Loyalhanna Watershed Assoc

WEST ROUTE: LINCOLN HIGHWAY HERITAGE CORRIDOR TRAILHEAD The Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor Trailhead, included Phase 2.8, is on a parcel that is owned by the LHHC at the intersection of Route 30/259. Installation of signs and pavement markings (as per MUTCD and AASHTO) will be required to alert trail users and motorists of the Route 30 crossing. The trailhead program includes: • • • • •

15-car pervious parking lot including 1 van accessible space accessible walkway connections from the parking area to the proposed shared-use path an information kiosk small lawn area for picnicking landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

50 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Existing conditions of the Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor Trailhead area

SECTION B.4:

East Route

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 51

ES DR

DR LAU REL

VE EA

LSID

AK E

RD

R

HIL

ST

SH

LEGEND GR EG BELL GSTA VE

MC GO WA N

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Middle School

Alternate Route

SEY FAR M

RD

ST

SU M

CHARLOTTE DR

MIT

DR

Culvert

MOUNTAIN RD

KIN

FRANKLIN ST

DR

Phase 2.3 BOYD LN

STO

NE R

LN

BRA LLIE R

WILDVIEW DR

RE DR

HI AC

Old Lincoln Hwy SUNSET LN

RAM

P RT

FRIENDSHIP LN

30E

to RT

30W

DGE LN

OLD

DORNICK HILL LN

LIN

CO LN

HW

Y

N

XL FO

LN

Ligonier Beach

ANV

IL LN

OFFBRI

LEY OL

TAS Y

WO

FAN

THOM AS RD

COOL SPRINGS LN

30

ACRES LN

EVERGREEN LN

ST

GREEN

MAIN

Phase 2.5

EN L

PETERS RD ED

GE

R LN

CHE

SAMA

VIS

TA L

BUE

LL L

MO

NT

N

Old Lincoln Hwy Trailhead (pg 54)

RD

NR

Laurel Valley Golf Club

M

381

na

an

lh

ya

EMA

30

N

Lo

D

BOU

PHEASANT CIR

N

LN

RL

D

PE

OO

UM

LN

PJ

Y AX

L GA

ASP

WA TT SW

UM

BRIC

ST

LN

SATU

ek

re

C

D

NT

EMO

EDG

RS R

PETE

711

RD

EN

SID

PRE R

D TS

EAST ROUTE: PRIMARY ALIGNMENT The proposed East Route, Phase 2.5, begins at the intersection of Bell Street and Old Lincoln Highway, extends southwest, and ends at the Route 30/381 intersection.

This section is approximately 1.6 miles in length.

N

W LN

EID AL

IC VIE

SCEN

ON

E LN

STON

ISE

ER

DR

L

HAL

RY LN

MULBER

WO

OD

LN

LN

ROUTE 711

LING

STIR

OK

O BR

LE

DD

SA

LN

R OC K LN

NR

The on-road route travels in the public right-of-way on Old Lincoln Highway from the intersection with Bell Street for approximately 1.5 miles. It then crosses Route 30 and transitions to a shared-use path for an additional 0.1 miles (400 feet) in public right-of-way until it reaches Route 381, where it continues as an existing signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) route to Linn Run State Park.

LING

SU

M PAL

LE COBB

WO

ND

ER

Aerial image showing the primary (red) alignment

52 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

ROL

RD KYA

RN LN

N

WILLOW LN

FRE

RE

FERR Y LN

Shared Travel Lane

Shared Travel Lane

Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities D1-1b (R)

D1-1b (R) D1-1b (L)

D1-1c

D4-3

D11-1

M1-8

D1-1b (L)

M1-9

M4-11

M4-12

D1-1c

M4-13

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M4-11

M7-6

M7-2

D11-1

M1-8

M4-12

M4-13

M7-1

M7-1

M1-9

M7-2

D4-3

M7-7

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M7-6

M7-7

Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) Option: To establish a unique identification (route designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used.

Option: Standard: To have establish a unique identification designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route The Bicycle Route sign shall contain a route designation and shall a green background with (route a (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used. retroreflectorized white legend and border.

Standard: Option: shall contain a route designation and shall have a green background with a Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances throughThe twoBicycle or moreRoute States,sign a coordinated retroreflectorized white legend and submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation mayborder. be sent to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Option: (see Page i for the address).

Standard: Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances through two or more States, a coordinated submittal by the an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent The Interstate Bicycle Route (M1-9) sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain theaffected assignedStates routefor number to the American of State Highway and Transportation Officials (see Page i for the address). designation and have a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized whiteAssociation background.

Standard: Guidance: Theplaced Interstate Bicycle Route enough (M1-9) to sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain the assigned route number If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be at intervals frequent a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized white background. keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to reminddesignation motorists ofand the have presence of bicyclists.

Guidance: Sect. 9B.20 If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be placed at intervals frequent enough to keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists.

EAST ROUTE: OLD LINCOLN HIGHWAY Sect. 9B.20

A majority of the East Route travels along Old Lincoln Highway where the existing road condition consists of two travel lanes. The proposed primary alignment is a shared travel lane in either direction along Old Lincoln Highway that would be designated by a sharrow and signage.

Existing condition on Old Lincoln Highway showing two travel lanes

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 53

d Ol ln

co

Lin

nn

y Hw

Pe

D

O

T

R

O

W Ph

ea

Kiosk

sa

nt

C

irc

le

Sh

ar

ed

-U

se

R

Pa

ou

th

te

30

Landscape Buffer

Accessible Trail

1

Existing Signed Shared Roadway

e ut

38

o

R

EAST ROUTE: OLD LINCOLN HIGHWAY TRAILHEAD The Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead is located at the Old Lincoln Highway/Route 30 intersection. Installation of signs and pavement markings (as per MUTCD and AASHTO) will be required to alert trail users and motorists of the Route 30 crossing. The trailhead program includes: • • •

•

accessible shared-use path an information kiosk 10 foot wide landscape buffer between the shareduse path and Route 30 (with possible 42-inch high vertical barrier if determined necessary during implementation phase) landscaped areas with native plants and rain gardens to filter stormwater runoff

54 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Existing conditions of the Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead area

SECTION B.5:

South Route

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 55

BER DR

ME

ST CLAIR CIR

AD

LN RY FER

FIELD ST

FAIR

T AN S CGOW

M

RL

ST

FIS HE

ER DR

N

HILLSIDE

LN

FR

30

AN

KL

IN

Phase 2.3

DR

REL

LAU

ST

Middle School

Fort Ligonier

IT DR

SUMM

yal

ha

nn

aC

MO

ree

UN

k

ER LN

STON

CO O

PR

EV ER

LN

HER LN

VIL

AN

MA REE

GS LN PL N

HI

GR E

TASY FAN

BOUC

IN

DS

AR

LN

HI A CRE

DR

MP RA

SAMA

F

RD

TT LO

CH

ST

IEN

TA IN

R ED

N

FR

IN MA

LS

L YD BO

BRICKY ARD LN

D NR

RD

M FAR

SEY

KIN

Lo

LN

E LN EDG NYL SUN

Phase 2.6

EN

DS

N

AVE

GSTAVE GREEG LL B

OO

TL

SHAK

PE

RR YW

DR

FO RB E

T TS

OW

SD R

RE AWA DEL ST

T RKE MA

NU

L WA

ST

BURD

NICELY RD

RA MP AR

W

to R

VIE

0E

ILD

W

RT3

DR

W

T30

W

711

OW ILL

Laurel Valley Golf Club

LN

N UR

GALAXY LN

LN

Shared-Use Path COB B

PETE

RS R

D

AlternateLNRoute LES

TON E

EL

N

SU

NS

ET

LN

Ligonier LN S Beach EN ACRE

TE

RS

E

GR

WOOLL LN HWY OEY FOX LN LINC

LN

SADDLEBROOK LN

ELL

BU

D

NT R

E LN

EMO

OLD

EDG

SUNRIS

RD

SOUTH ROUTE: PRIMARY ALIGNMENT E7

UT

RO

STUMP

JUMPER

LN

EN

ASP

DO

RN

ICK

HI

LL

LN

LN AS OM

PALMER

11

The proposed South Route, Phase 2.6, begins at the intersection of Loyalhanna Street and South Market Street (Route 711), extends south, and ends at the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art on Boucher Lane. This section is approximately 0.5 miles in length.

RD

TH

A LN VIST

DR

RD

TS DR

ONT

EDGEM

PRESIDEN

N IDA L

ONE

STIR LING L

HAL

The on-road route travels in the public right-of-way on South Market Street (Route 711) from the intersection with Loyalhanna Street for approximately 0.1 miles (400 feet). It then crosses Route 30 and continues for an additional 0.4 miles in public right-of-way until it reaches the museum on Boucher Lane.

R

RD

LLIE

BRA

PE

Culvert

IDG

LN LN WATTSWOOD

SAT

On-Road Route SC VIEW

OF

FBR

LEGEND ENIC

30

MU

LBE RRY Aerial image showing the primary (red) alignment LN

56 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

OD LN

ERWO

WOND

PH

EA

S

6’

6’

Dedicated Bike Lane

Dedicated Bike Lane

Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities Page 9B-10

shift travel lanes slightly to accommodate dedicated bike lanes

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs for Bicycle Facilities D1-1b (R)

D1-1b (R) D1-1b (L)

D1-1c

D4-3

D11-1

M1-8

D1-1b (L)

M1-9

M4-11

M4-12

D1-1c

M4-13

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M4-11

M7-6

M7-2

D11-1

M1-8

M4-12

M4-13

M7-1

M7-1

M1-9

M7-2

D4-3

M7-7

M7-3

M7-4

M7-5

M7-6

M7-7

Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) Option: To establish a unique identification (route designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used.

Option: Standard: To have establish a unique identification designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route The Bicycle Route sign shall contain a route designation and shall a green background with (route a (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used. retroreflectorized white legend and border.

Standard: Option: shall contain a route designation and shall have a green background with a Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances throughThe twoBicycle or moreRoute States,sign a coordinated retroreflectorized white legend and submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation mayborder. be sent to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Option: (see Page i for the address).

Standard: Where a designated bicycle route extends for long distances through two or more States, a coordinated submittal by the an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent The Interstate Bicycle Route (M1-9) sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain theaffected assignedStates routefor number to the American of State Highway and Transportation Officials (see Page i for the address). designation and have a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized whiteAssociation background.

Standard: Guidance: Theplaced Interstate Bicycle Route enough (M1-9) to sign (see Figure 9B-4) shall contain the assigned route number If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be at intervals frequent a black legend and border with a retroreflectorized white background. keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to reminddesignation motorists ofand the have presence of bicyclists.

Guidance: Sect. 9B.20 If used, the Bicycle Route or Interstate Bicycle Route signs should be placed at intervals frequent enough to keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists.

Sect. 9B.20

SOUTH ROUTE: ROUTE 711 The South Route travels along Route 711 where the existing road condition consists of two travel lanes. There are two options for extending the route south, which should be explored in further detail during the implementation phase.

Top: Proposed Route 711 section illustrating Option 1 Bottom: Existing condition on Route 711 south of Route 30 showing two travel lanes

Option 1 designates a dedicated bike lane in either direction along Route 711 that would be delineated by pavement markings and signage (as per MUTCD and AASHTO) until it reaches the intersection with Boucher Lane. Option 2 is to designate that section of Route 711 as a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) route, similar to existing Route 381 south of Route 30. Design upgrades to the existing roadway may be deemed necessary to accommodate bike traffic including bicycle-safe drainage grates, bridge expansion joints, and upgrading paved shoulders.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 57

58 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

SECTION B.6:

Future Expansion

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 59

217

Kingston Dam 30

Loyalhanna Gorge

30

LVRR Museum

Idlewild Park

WEST ROUTE: FUTURE EXPANSION The scope of the feasibility study terminates on the eastern edge of Idlewild Park at Idlewild Lane. Future expansion of the West Route could travel about 5.0 miles through Idlewild Park and Loyalhanna Gorge Greenway until it reaches Latrobe. This route would follow portions of the historic Ligonier Valley Rail Road (LVRR) line, which ended service in 1952. The LVRR Museum, recently opened in 2010, is housed in a newly renovated Darlington Station off Idlewild Hill Lane. The Greenway, overseen by the County Parks & Recreation Department, stretches from Idlewild Park northwest to the Kingston Dam near the Route 30/217 intersection, and links the Chesnut Ridge and Laurel Hill Greenways. A major hurdle to achieving this future connection would be aquiring property and/or easements through the Idlewild Park property.

60 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Above: Conceptual future expansion route (orange dots) Below: Restored Darlington Station off Idlewild Hill Lane currently houses the LVRR Museum (from Ligonier Valley Rail Road Museum)

OLH Trailhead 381

30

Laughlintown Compass Inn Museum

Rolling Rock Club

30

EAST ROUTE: FUTURE EXPANSION

Above: Conceptual future expansion route (orange dots) Below: Compass Inn Museum on Route 30 in Laughlintown (from Compass Inn Museum)

The scope of the feasibility study terminates at the Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead at the Route 30/381 intersection. Future expansion of the East Route could extend approximately 1.1 miles along Route 30 until it reaches Laughlintown. At the center of town lies the Compass Inn Museum, a historic stagecoach stop built in 1799 and used until 1862 when the railroads became popular. Across California Avenue from the museum is Ligonier Country Inn. Laughlintown is also home to another regional landmark, The Pie Shoppe, which has been in business for 65 years.

Property issues would restrict the future connection to Laughlintown to a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) along Route 30. Portions of the route may be configured as a shared use path within the PennDOT right-ofway from Route 381 east about 0.25 miles.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 61

381 Laughlintown Ligonier Country Club Rolling Rock Club

30

Rector

Linn Run Rd

381

Valley School Linn Run State Park

ALT SOUTH ROUTE: FUTURE EXPANSION The scope of the feasibility study terminates at the Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead at the Route 30/381 intersection. Future expansion of an Alternative South Route could extend approximately 4.7 miles along Route 381, through Rector, and onto Linn Run Road to Linn Run State Park.

The park is 612 acres of mixed hardwood and evergreen forest and is a popular place for picnicking and hiking.

It borders 50,000-acre Forbes State Forest. Within Linn Run, there are approximately 6.25 miles of hiking trails.

Bicycles are not permitted on the trails in Linn Run but are permitted on designated trails in Forbes State Forest.

The route would follow Route 381, currently designated a signed shared roadway, for 3.0 miles then along a newly designated signed shared route on Linn Run Road for another 1.7 miles. An altnerative route could follow the Old Linn Run Road right-of-way to the Valley School property.

62 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Above: Conceptual future expansion route (orange dots) Below: Linn Run State Park (from OMT blog by Dave Juliette)

SECTION C:

Bike Wayfinding & Signage

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 63

What do sharrows mean for motorists and bicyclists?

Motorists • Expect to see bicyclists on the street • Remember to give bicyclists three feet of space when passing • Follow the rules of the road as if there were no sharrows Bicyclists • Use the sharrow to guide where you ride within the lane • Remember not to ride too close to parked cars • Follow the rules of the road as if there were no sharrows

SHARED LANE MARKING: “SHARROW” Sharrows are comprised of an image of a bicycle with a series of chevrons to indicate that motorists and cyclists are to share the travel lane. They are used on streets that are too narrow for conventional bike lanes.

Unlike bicycle lanes, sharrows do not designate a particular part of the street for the exclusive use of cyclists. They are simply a marking to guide cyclists to the best place to ride on the road, avoid car doors, and help motorists expect to see and share the lane with cyclists.

While cyclists are allowed on all public streets, it is important to designate some streets as part of the bikeway system in order to help cyclists safely navigate to their destination.

64 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Top: Typical plan showing relationship of sharrow to travel and parking lanes (from Seattle Department of Transportation) Bottom: An example of a shared lane pavement marking or “sharrow” (from Bike Pittsburgh)

SHARED LANE MARKING: EXAMPLE Sharrows are a relatively simple and inexpensive way to expand and designate a bicycle network as seen in the above example.

The sharrow is typically installed 11 feet from the curb, or approximately 4 feet from parked cars. It is intended to indicate where bicyclists should ride to avoid traveling within the door zone of parked cars. It also alerts motorists to share the road with bicyclists and conveys that the street is a preferred bike route.

Top: Photo after sharrows added to street Bottom: Photo before sharrows (both from Seattle Department of Transportation)

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 65

Page 9B-5

Fi

2. Regulatory Signs for Bicycle Facilities

R5-6

R7-9

R4-1

PagePage 9B-10 9B-10

W2-2

Page 9B-10

R5-3

R7-9a

R4-2

Figure Figure 9B-4.

9B-4.

Guide Guide Signs Signs forfor Bicycle Bicycle Facilities Facilities 2003 Edition

2003 Edition

R4-3

2003 20E

Page 9B-9

D1-1b (R)

Figure 9B-4. for Bicycle Facilities FigureGuide 9B-3.

Warning Signs for Bicycle Facilities (Sheet 2 of 2) R3-17aSigns R5-1b

R9-3a D1-1b (R) W3-2 R3-17

W3-1

D1-1b (L)

D1-1b D1-1b (R) (R)

2003 Edition R9-5

Page 9B-9

R9-6

R9-7

R10-3

R10-22

R15-1

Figure 9B-3. WarningW11-1 Signs for Bicycle Facilities (Sheet 2 of 2) R9-3c W11-1 R3-17b D1-1b D1-1b (L) (L)

Regulatory

Sect. 9B.05

D4-3 D4-3

D1-1c D1-1c

D11-1 D11-1

M1-8 M

R5-3 D1-1b (L)

W11-1

D1-1c

D4-3

D11-1

M1-8 W16-7p W11-1

W11-1

W11-2

W16-1

Page 9B-10

2003 Edition

2003 Edition

W11-1 Figure 9B-4.

Signs for Bicycle Facilities Figure 9B-4. Guide Signs forGuide Bicycle Facilities

W7-5 Warning

W16-7p

M1-9 W11-2

W16-1

R4-3 D1-1b (R)

M1-9 M1-9

R4-4

OR

R9-3a M4-12 M4-12

M4-11 M4-11

R4-7

R9-5

R9-6 M4-13 M4-13

R9-7 M7-1 M

M7-2

M7-3

M7-6 M7-6

M7-7 M

D1-1b (R) M1-9

M4-11

W12-2

M4-12

W8-10

M4-13

M7-1 W15-1

OR

D1-1b (L)D1-1c D1-1b (L) W8-10p Guide W10-1

D1-1c D4-3

D4-3 D11-1

M7-2 M7-2 M7-3 M7-3 Section 9B.18 Other Bicycle Warning Signs

D11-1 M1-8 M7-4 M7-4

M1-8 M7-5 M7-5

W12-2 W15-1 Option: Section 9B.20 Bicycle Rou M7-3 bicycle warning M7-4 M7-5 M7-6 M7-7 Other signs (see Figure 9B-3) such as BIKEWAY NARROWS (W5-4a) and Hill (W7-5) Option: Page 9B-2 2003 Edition FACILITY SIGNS may be installed on bicycle facilities to warn bicyclists of conditions not readily apparent.

To establish a unique ident The sampling of bicycle facility signs and typical place9B-1. Sign Placement on Shared-Use Paths In situations where there is a need to warn motorists toFigure watch for bicyclists traveling along the highway, (M1-8) sign (seethe Figure 9B-4) ment (shown right)SHARE areSection from the Manual on Uniform THE ROAD (W16-1) plaqueTraf(see FigureSigns 9B-3) may be used in conjunction with theStandard: W11-1 sign.

9B.18 Other Bicycle Warning Section Section 9B.20 9B.20 Bicycle Bicycle Route Route Signs Signs (M1-8, (M1-8, M1-9) M1-9) fic Control DevicesGuidance: forOption: Streets and Highways (MUTCD as 0.9 m (3 ft) MIN. 0.9 m (3 ft) MIN. 1.8 m (6 ft) MAX. 1.8 m (6 The ft) MAX.Bicycle Route sign sh Option: Option: 3 R5-6 R7-9 R7-9a published by the U.S. IfDepartment of Transporation Fedused, other advance bicycle warning signs should be installed no less than 15 m (50 ft) in advance of the white legen retroreflectorized Other bicycle warning signs (see Figure 9B-3) such as BIKEWAY NARROWS (W5-4a) and Hill (W7-5) To establish To establish a unique a unique identification identification (route (route designation) designation) for for a State a State or local or local bicycle bicycle route, route, the the Bicycle Bicycle Ro Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, M1-9) beginning of the condition. may be installed on bicycle facilities to warn bicyclists of conditions not readily apparent.

Option: eral Highway Administration), which regulates their use (M1-8) (M1-8) signsign (see(see Figure Figure 9B-4) 9B-4) maymay be used. be used.

Option: Where temporarywhere trafficthere control present on bikeways, appropriate signs from Part 6Where should used.the bicycl In situations is azones need are to warn motorists to watch for bicyclists traveling along the highway, a be designated and placement.

Standard: Standard: SHARE THE ROAD (W16-1) plaque (see Figure 9B-3) may be used in conjunction with the W11-1 sign.

To establish a unique identification (route designation) for a State or local bicycle route, the Bicycle Route submittal by the affected State Option: M1-9 M4-11 M4-11 TheThe M4-12 M4-13 M7-1 M1-9 M4-13 Bicycle Bicycle Route Route sign sign shall shall contain contain a route aM7-1 route designation designation and and shall shall have a green a green background background with w (M1-8) sign (see Figure Other 9B-4) warning may beM4-12 used. tohave the American Association of Guidance: signs described white in Chapter 2Cand may beborder. installed on bicycle facilities as appropriate. retroreflectorized retroreflectorized white legend legend and border.

Standard: Standard: If used,Option: other advance bicycle warning signs should be installed no less than 15 m (50 ft) in advance of the Option: Section 9B.19contain Route Guide Signs beginning of Bicycle the condition.

The Bicycle Route sign shall a route designation and (D11-1) shall have a green background with a The Interstate Bicycle Ro Where Where a designated a designated bicycle bicycle route route extends extends for for longlong distances distances through through twotwo or more or more States, States, coordinated a coordinat Guidance: retroreflectorized white legend and border. designation andabe have a black Where temporary traffic control zones are present on bikeways, appropriate signs from Part 6 should used. submittal submittal by the by the affected affected States States for for an assignment an assignment of an ofWidth Interstate an ofInterstate Bicycle Route Route number number designation designation mayma b shared-use pathBicycle If used, Bicycle Route Guide (D11-1) signs (see Figure 9B-4) should be provided at decision points along Option: Guidance: Option: to the to the American American Association Association of State of State Highway Highway andand Transportation Transportation Officials Officials (see (see Page Page i fori for the the address). address). designated bicycle routes, for including signs to through inform bicyclists of bicycle route direction changes If and Where a designated bicycle route extends long distances two orplacement more States, coordinated used, the Bicycle Route Other warning signs direction, described in Chapter 2Cdestination. may installed onashared-use bicycle facilities Standard: Standard: Typical sign be on paths as appropriate. confirmation signs for route distance, and submittal by the affected States for an assignment of an Interstate Bicycle Route number designation may be sent keep bicyclists informed of cha R9-6 R9-7 R10-3 R10-22 R15-1 M7-2 M7-3 M7-4 M7-5 M7-6 M7-7 2 M7-3 M7-4 M7-5 M7-6 M7-7 The The Interstate Interstate Bicycle Bicycle Route Route (M1-9) (M1-9) sign sign (see Figure Figure 9B-4) shall shall contain contain thethe assigned assigned route numb num If used, Bicycle Route Guide signs should be repeated atPage regular intervals so9B-4) that bicyclists entering from route to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (see i (see for the address).

Section 9B.19 Bicycle Route Guide Signs (D11-1) When placement of STOP or YIELD signs is considered, priority at a shared-use path/roadway intersection designation designation andand have have aknow black ashould black legend legend and and border border with with a retroreflectorized a retroreflectorized white white background. background.

Sect.

9B.20 side streets will have an opportunity to that they are on a bicycle route.

Similar guide signing should be Standard: Sect. 9B.05 be assigned with consideration of the following: Guidance: A. Relative speedsfor of shared-use path and roadway users; used for shared Guidance: roadways with intermediate signs placed bicyclist guidance.

Guidance: Relativecontain volumes of shared-use path should and roadway and The Interstate Bicycle Route (seeGuide Figure 9B-4)B. signs shall the 9B-4) assigned route number If used,(M1-9) Bicyclesign Route (D11-1) (see Figure betraffic; provided at decision points along C.or Relative importance of shared-use path and roadway.

Support: If used, If used, the the Bicycle Bicycle Route Route Interstate or Interstate Bicycle Bicycle Route Route signs signs should should be placed bechanges placed at intervals atand intervals frequent frequent enoug en designation and have a designated black legend and routes, borderincluding with a retroreflectorized white background. bicycle signsSpeed to inform bicyclists ofusedbicycle route direction should not be the sole factor to determine priority, as it is sometimes appropriate topresence give priority keep keep bicyclists bicyclists informed informed of changes of changes in route in route direction direction and and to remind to remind motorists motorists of the of the presence of bicyclists. of bicycli Figure 9B-5 shows an example of the signing forand thedestination. beginning and end ofstreet, a designated route ona aminor to a high-volume shared-use path crossing a low-volume or to a regional bicycle shared-use path crossing confirmation signs for route direction, distance, Guidance: collector street. shared-use path. Bicycle Figure Route 9B-6 shows an example ofbe signing for at anregular on-roadway bicycle route.

Figureentering 9B-7 shows If used, Guide signs should repeated intervals so that bicyclists from Sect.Sect.

9B.20 9B.20 M1-9) When priority is assigned,at theintervals least restrictivefrequent control that is appropriateto should be placed on the lower If used, theSigns Bicycle Route or signing Interstate Route should be placed enough Section 9B.20 Bicycle Route Signs (M1-8, B.20 Bicycle Route (M1-8, M1-9) examples of andBicycle markings for signs shared-use paths. priority approaches.

STOPare signson should not be used route. where YIELD signs would be acceptable. side streets will have an opportunity to know that they a bicycle Similar guide signing should be keep bicyclists informed of changes in route direction and to remind motorists of the presence of bicyclists.

Option: Section 9B.04 Lane (R3-17, R3-17a, R3-17b) used for shared roadways with intermediate signsBicycle placed forSigns bicyclist guidance.

Sect.To 9B.20 establish a unique identification designation) aStandard: State or local bicycle Route route, the Bicycle Route ablish a unique identification (route designation)(route for a State or local for bicycle route, the Bicycle Sect. 9B.18 to 9B.19 Support: The BIKE LANE (R3-17) sign (see Figure 9B-2) shall be used only in conjunction with marked bicycle (M1-8) sign (see Figure 9B-4) may be used. n (see Figure 9B-4) may be used. lanes as described in Section 9C.04, and shall be placed at periodic intervals along the bicycle lanes.

66 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study —9B-5 Ligonier, Pennsylvania Figure shows an example of Guidance: the signing for the beginning and end of a designated bicycle route on a Standard: shared-use path. Figure 9B-6 shows an example of signing anshould on-roadway route.

Figure shows The BIKE LANE (R3-17) signfor spacing be determinedbicycle by engineering judgment based on9B-7 prevailing speed bicycle and other a traffic, block background adjacentaintersections, and other considerations.

Route sign shall contain a route designation andof shall have green icycle RouteThe signBicycle shall contain aexamples route designation and shall havefor a green background with alength, distances fromwith of signing and markings shared-use paths.

The AHEAD (R3-17a) sign (see Figure 9B-2) should be mounted directly below a R3-17 sign in advance of white legend and border. ctorized retroreflectorized white legend and border. the beginning of a marked bicycle lane.

1.2 m (4 ft) MIN. 1.5 m (5 ft) MAX.

1.2 m (4 ft) MIN. 1.5 m (5 ft) MAX.

M7-2

2003 Edition

Page 9B-11

Figure 9B-5. Example of Signing for the Beginning and End of a Designated Bicycle Route on a Shared-Use Path

Page 9B-12

2003 Edition

Figure 9B-6. Example of Signing for an On-Roadway Bicycle Route

Shared-Use Path

D11-1 M4-12

30 m (100 ft)

R5-3

D11-1 D1-1 M7-1

W11-1 (optional)

R1-1 Roadway Varies- see Section 9B.17

In urban areas, signs typically should be placed approximately every 400 m (0.25 mi), at every turn in the route, and at all signalized intersections.

Varies- see Section 9B.17

W11-1 (optional)

D11-1 D1-1

D11-1 D1-1 M7-1

Shared-Use Path

On-Road Route

Sect. 9B.20

Sect. 9B.20

EXAMPLE SIGNING

The drawings shown above, from the MUTCD, depict typical sign placement for shared-use paths and on-road bicycle routes.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 67

Page 9C-8

2003 Edition

Figure 9C-6. Example of Optional Word and Symbol Pavement Markings for Bicycle Lanes

Figure 9C-9. Shared Lane Marking

Normal white line = 100 mm x 100 mm (4 in x 4 in)

1.8 m (6 ft) (optional)

2.8 m (9.25 ft)

Directional arrow

1.8 m (6 ft)

1.8 m (6 ft)

Symbols

Bike Lane Markings LANE MARKINGS The drawings shown above, from the MUTCD, depict typical size and placement for bike lane and shared lane pavement markings.

Sect. 9C.06

68 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Word Legends (optional)

1 m (3.25 ft)

Shared Lane Markings

SECTION D:

Budgeting & Construction

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 69

Old Linc

oln High

way

WEST (pg 45)

Ligonier Twp

Idlewild Park

NORTH (pg 25)

271

Phase One

Mill

ek

Cre

30 Lo

ya

lha

nn

a

Cr

Ligonier TOWN (pg 35)

ee

k

SOUTH (page 55)

LEGEND

30

711

Cultural/Institutional Civic Utility

Laurel Valley GC

Parks/Open Space

O

ld

Recreation LWA LC&CC

EAST (pg 51)

Li

nc

381

ol

n

Hi

gh

Laughlintown

wa

y

Bethlen Homes

PHASING STRATEGY Realizing that the improvements identified in this study collectively represent approximately $1.7M to $2M (excluding Future Expansion proposals) in new infrastructure improvements in 2011 dollars, it is important to consider how individual projects can be organized to make the overall implementation of the project manageable. An important consideration when developing the phasing strategy is the desire to maximize overall connectivity along the LVTB route as quickly as possible.

The key to this strategy is to build off the existing Phase One shared-use path. Extending this route north to the existing ball fields at Ligonier Camp & Conference Center and south to Weller Field on a new trail bridge over Mill Creek will provide immediate connectivity for residents and visitors of Ligonier to important community assets.

70 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

The following breakdown represents an itemized list of projects organized into separate phases to be achieved within a 10 to 15 year completion horizon. The proposed improvements are organized into eight separate phases: • Phase 2.1: North Route - Phase 1 to LC&CC Fields • Phase 2.2: Town Route - Trail Bridge over Mill Creek • Phase 2.3: Town Route - All On-Road Routes • Phase 2.4: West Route - All On-Road Routes • Phase 2.5: East Route - All On-Road Routes • Phase 2.6: South Route - All On-Road Routes • Phase 2.7: North Route - LC&CC Ball Fields to Ligonier Township Municipal Building • Phase 2.8: West Route - All Shared-Use Paths • Phase 2.9: Town Route - All Shared-Use Paths

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2: Base & Additional Improvements Summary On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

36,600 12,000 150 48,750

Component Name

Cost

Route Base & Additional Improvements Phase 2.1: North Route - Phase One to LC&CC Ball Fields Phase 2.2: Town Route - Bridge over Mill Creek Phase 2.3: Town Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.4: West Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.5: East Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.6: South Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.7: North Route - LC&CC to Township Building Phase 2.8: West Route - All Shared-Use Paths Phase 2.9: Town Route - All Shared-Use Paths Total Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

333,067.00 111,301.00 76,348.00 43,633.00 67,965.00 12,876.00 182,761.00 240,956.00 97,477.00 1,166,384.00 23.93

Trailhead Base & Additional Improvements Phase 2.1: Baltic Road Trailhead Phase 2.2: Mill Creek Trailhead Phase 2.3: Library Trailhead Phase 2.3: Country Market Trailhead Phase 2.5: Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead Phase 2.7: Municipal Building Trailhead Phase 2.8: LHHC Trailhead Total

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

104,003.00 138,049.00 42,390.50 84,408.50 42,540.00 59,526.00 78,523.00 549,440.00

Phase 2 Total

$

1,715,824.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

PHASE 2: SUMMARY The overall preliminary opinion of estimated construction cost for Phase 2 is shown to the left summarized by component (Route Site & Landscape Improvements) and phase (Phases 2.1 to 2.9). In round figures, the proposed primary routes for Phase 2 are estimated as follows: • Routes - $1,1670,000 for 48,750 feet (9.2 miles) of on-road routes and shared-use paths (approximately $24 per linear foot) • Trailheads - $550,000 for 7 trailhead sites The cost for on-street routes includes pavement markings, signage, and bike racks. Cost for shared-use paths includes site preparation (erosion control, clearing and grubbing, and earthwork), crushed limestone trail on an aggregate base, signage, site furnishings (benches, litter receptacles, and bike racks), pedestrian trail bridges, culverts, and seeding.

Trailhead costs include site preparation (erosion control, clearing and grubbing, and earthwork), gravel parking lots, trail connections to route network, signage, trailhead kiosk, site furnishings (benches, litter receptacles, and bike racks/lockers), landscaping, rain gardens, and seeding.

Cost estimates do not include alternate alignments, permit or application fees that may be required to obtain regulatory approvals, and any easement or property aquisition costs.

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is 1 the cost of recognized, however, that GAI has no control over

labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors’ methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 71

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2: Base Improvements Summary

PHASE 2: BASE IMPROVEMENTS The overall preliminary opinion of estimated construction cost for Phase 2 base improvements is shown to the right summarized by component (Route Site & Landscape Improvements) and phase (Phases 2.1 to 2.9). In round figures, the proposed primary routes for Phase 2 are estimated as follows: • Routes - $960,000 for 48,750 feet (9.2 miles) of on-road routes and shared-use paths (approximately $20 per linear foot) • Trailheads - $285,000 for 7 trailhead sites

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

36,600 12,000 150 48,750

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements Phase 2.1: North Route - Phase One to LC&CC Ball Fields Phase 2.2: Town Route - Bridge over Mill Creek Phase 2.3: Town Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.4: West Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.5: East Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.6: South Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.7: North Route - LC&CC to Township Building Phase 2.8: West Route - All Shared-Use Paths Phase 2.9: Town Route - All Shared-Use Paths Total Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

254,320.00 97,369.00 76,348.00 43,633.00 62,154.00 12,876.00 139,700.00 197,895.00 74,829.00 959,124.00 19.67

Trailhead Base Improvements Phase 2.1: Baltic Road Trailhead Phase 2.2: Mill Creek Trailhead Phase 2.3: Library Trailhead Phase 2.3: Country Market Trailhead Phase 2.5: Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead Phase 2.7: Municipal Building Trailhead Phase 2.8: LHHC Trailhead Total

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

67,125.00 89,251.00 13,410.00 35,611.00 19,296.00 17,806.00 42,018.00 284,517.00

Phase 2 Total

$

1,243,641.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is 1 the cost of recognized, however, that GAI has no control over

labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors’ methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

72 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2: Additional Improvements Summary On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

36,600 12,000 150 48,750

Component Name

Cost

Route Additional Improvements Phase 2.1: North Route - Phase One to LC&CC Ball Fields Phase 2.2: Town Route - Bridge over Mill Creek Phase 2.3: Town Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.4: West Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.5: East Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.6: South Route - All On-Road Routes Phase 2.7: North Route - LC&CC to Township Building Phase 2.8: West Route - All Shared-Use Paths Phase 2.9: Town Route - All Shared-Use Paths Total Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

78,747.00 13,932.00 5,811.00 43,061.00 43,061.00 22,648.00 207,260.00 4.25

Trailhead Additional Improvements Phase 2.1: Baltic Road Trailhead Phase 2.2: Mill Creek Trailhead Phase 2.3: Library Trailhead Phase 2.3: Country Market Trailhead Phase 2.5: Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead Phase 2.7: Municipal Building Trailhead Phase 2.8: LHHC Trailhead Total

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

36,878.00 48,798.00 28,980.50 48,797.50 23,244.00 41,720.00 36,505.00 264,923.00

Phase 2 Total

$

472,183.00

PHASE 2: ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS The overall preliminary opinion of estimated construction cost for Phase 2 additional improvements is shown to the right summarized by component (Route Site & Landscape Improvements) and phase (Phases 2.1 to 2.9). In round figures, the proposed primary routes for Phase 2 are estimated as follows: • Routes - $271,000 for 48,750 feet (9.2 miles) of on-road routes and shared-use paths (approximately $4 per linear foot) • Trailheads - $265,000 for 7 trailhead sites

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is 1 the cost of recognized, however, that GAI has no control over

labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors’ methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 73

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.1: North Route - Phase One to LC&CC Ball Fields

PHASE 2.1: NORTH ROUTE Phase One to LC&CC Ball Fields Phase 2.1 begins at the intersection of the Phase 1 trail and Peoples Road, extends northeast, and ends at the northern end of the Ligonier Camp & Conference Center ball field site. Improvements include: • 4,600 feet (0.87 miles) of shared-use paths • Baltic Road Trailhead (adjacent to Phase 1 trail) In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.1 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

0 4,600 0 4,600

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

170,685.00 8,534.00 34,137.00 40,964.00 254,320.00 55.29

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

8,000.00 44,850.00 2,643.00 10,570.00 12,684.00 78,747.00

Trailhead Base Improvements Baltic Road Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

45,050.00 2,253.00 9,010.00 10,812.00 67,125.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements Baltic Road Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

24,750.00 1,238.00 4,950.00 5,940.00 36,878.00

Phase 2.1 Total

$

437,070.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

74 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 14, 2011 Phase 2.2: Town Route - Bridge over Mill Creek On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

0 700 70 770

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

65,348.00 3,267.00 13,070.00 15,684.00 97,369.00 126.45

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

2,000.00 7,350.00 468.00 1,870.00 2,244.00 13,932.00

Trailhead Base Improvements Mill Creek Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

59,900.00 2,995.00 11,980.00 14,376.00 89,251.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements Mill Creek Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

32,750.00 1,638.00 6,550.00 7,860.00 48,798.00

Phase 2.2 Total

$

249,350.00

PHASE 2.2: TOWN ROUTE Trail Bridge over Mill Creek Phase 2.2 begins at the southern end of the Phase 1 trail and extends southwest over Mill Creek via a new trail bridge on the existing railroad bridge abutments. Improvements include: • 700 feet (0.2 miles) of shared-use paths/ramp to connect trail bridge to Boquet Street on-road route • 70 feet of trail bridge over Mill Creek (accounts for roughly $55,000 of Route Base Improvements cost) • Mill Creek Trailhead In addition to these costs, Phase 2.2 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 75

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.3: Town Route - All On-Road Routes

PHASE 2.3: TOWN ROUTE All On-Road Routes Phase 2.3 includes all on-road routes within Ligonier Borough public rights-of-way designated by shared lane pavement markings (sharrows) and signage. Improvements include: • 15,900 feet (3.0 miles) of on-road routes • Library Trailhead • Country Market Trailhead In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.3 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

15,900 0 0 15,900

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

Trailhead Base Improvements Library Trailhead Country Market Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

9,000.00 23,900.00 1,645.00 6,580.00 7,896.00 49,021.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements Library Trailhead Country Market Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

19,450.00 32,750.00 2,610.00 10,440.00 12,528.00 77,778.00

Phase 2.3 Total

$

203,147.00

51,240.00 2,562.00 10,248.00 12,298.00 76,348.00 4.80

-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or deNotes

tailed cost concerning estimates probable preparedconstruction

by GAI represent judgment Statements cost and/oritsdetailed

as a professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the contractors’ methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

76 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.4: West Route - All On-Road Routes On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

9,100 0 0 9,100

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

-

Trailhead Base Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Trailhead Additional Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Phase 2.4 Total

$

PHASE 2.4: WEST ROUTE All On-Road Routes Phase 2.4 begins at the Farm Market Trailhead (intersection of West Main Street and Springer Road), extends northwest, and ends at Idlewild Park. Improvements include: • 9,100 feet (1.7 miles) of on-road routes

29,284.00 1,464.00 5,857.00 7,028.00 43,633.00 4.79

In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.4 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

43,633.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 77

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.5: East Route - All On-Road Routes

PHASE 2.5: EAST ROUTE All On-Road Routes Phase 2.5 begins begins at the intersection of Bell Street and Old Lincoln Highway, extends southwest, and ends at the Route 30/381 intersection. Improvements include: • 8,200 feet (1.6 miles) of on-road routes • 400 feet (0.1 miles) of shared-use path between Old Lincoln Highway and Route 381 • Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.5 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

8,200 400 0 8,600

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

26,344.00 15,370.00 2,086.00 8,343.00 10,011.00 62,154.00 7.23

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

3,900.00 195.00 780.00 936.00 5,811.00

Trailhead Base Improvements Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

12,950.00 648.00 2,590.00 3,108.00 19,296.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements Old Lincoln Highway Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

15,600.00 780.00 3,120.00 3,744.00 23,244.00

Phase 2.5 Total

$

110,505.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

78 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.6: South Route - All On-Road Routes On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

2,600 0 0 2,600

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

-

Trailhead Base Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Trailhead Additional Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Phase 2.6 Total

$

PHASE 2.6: SOUTH ROUTE All On-Road Routes Phase 2.6 begins at the intersection of Loyalhanna Street and South Market Street (Route 711), extends south, and ends at the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art on Boucher Lane. Improvements include: • 2,600 feet (0.5 miles) of on-road routes

8,642.00 432.00 1,728.00 2,074.00 12,876.00 4.95

In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.6 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

12,876.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 79

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.7: North Route - LC&CC to Township Building

PHASE 2.7: NORTH ROUTE LC&CC Ball Fields to Township Building Phase 2.7 begins at the northern end of Phase 2.1, extends northeast, and ends at the Ligonier Township Municipal Building. Improvements include: • 400 feet (0.1 miles) of on-road route paralleling Route 711 • 2,500 feet (0.5 miles) of shared-use path • Municipal Building Trailhead In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.7 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

400 2,500 0 2,900

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,018.00 92,740.00 4,688.00 18,752.00 22,502.00 139,700.00 48.17

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

4,000.00 24,900.00 1,445.00 5,780.00 6,936.00 43,061.00

Trailhead Base Improvements Municipal Building Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

11,950.00 598.00 2,390.00 2,868.00 17,806.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements Municipal Building Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

28,000.00 1,400.00 5,600.00 6,720.00 41,720.00

Phase 2.7 Total

$

242,287.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the with construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

80 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 14, 2011 Phase 2.8: West Route - All Shared-Use Paths On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

0 2,500 70 2,570

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

132,815.00 6,641.00 26,563.00 31,876.00 197,895.00 77.00

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

4,000.00 24,900.00 1,445.00 5,780.00 6,936.00 43,061.00

Trailhead Base Improvements LHHC Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

28,200.00 1,410.00 5,640.00 6,768.00 42,018.00

Trailhead Additional Improvements LHHC Trailhead Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

24,500.00 1,225.00 4,900.00 5,880.00 36,505.00

Phase 2.8 Total

$

319,479.00

PHASE 2.8: WEST ROUTE All Shared-Use Paths A portion of Phase 2.8 begins at the western end of Phase 2.4, extends west, and ends at Idlewild Lane. Phase 2.8 also includes the east-west shared-use path connection between Carey School and Springer Road. Improvements include: • 2,500 feet (0.5 miles) of shared-use paths • 70 feet of trail bridge near Route 30/259 intersection (accounts for roughly $55,000 of Route Base Improvements cost) • Lincoln Highway Heritage Corridor Trailhead In addition to these costs, Phase 2.8 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the with construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 81

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Preliminary Opinion of Probable Site & Landscape Construction Costs GAI Consultants, Inc. February 9, 2011 Phase 2.9: Town Route - All Shared-Use Paths

PHASE 2.9: TOWN ROUTE All Shared-Use Paths Phase 2.9 connects the new Mill Creek trail bridge to Kastner Street with a shared-use path. Improvements include: This section is approximately 1,700 feet in length (400 feet of on-road routes and 1,300 feet of shared-use paths). Estimates include primary alignments only.

• 400 feet (0.1 miles) of on-road route • 1,300 feet (0.3 miles) of shared-use path In addition to the costs shown here, Phase 2.9 may require easement and/or property acquisition for some of its length and will require coordination with state agencies.

On-Road Route Shared-Use Path Trail Bridge Total Phase Length (feet)

400 1,300 0 1,700

Component Name

Cost

Route Base Improvements On-Road Route Improvements Shared-Use Path Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal Cost per Linear Foot

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,018.00 49,203.00 2,511.00 10,044.00 12,053.00 74,829.00 44.02

Route Additional Improvements Site Furnishings Landscape Improvements Mobilization (5%) Design Fees (10%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

2,000.00 13,200.00 760.00 3,040.00 3,648.00 22,648.00

Trailhead Base Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Trailhead Base Improvements (no trailheads this phase) Mobilization (5%) Design & Inspection Fees (20%) Contingency (20%) Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

Phase 2.9 Total

$

97,477.00

Notes Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or de-

Statements concerning probable construction cost and/or detailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment as a as a professional with the construction It is professional familiar familiar with the construction industry. It isindustry. recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the cost of labor, materials recognized, however, that GAI has no control over the costorof equipment, over the contractors' methods of determining bid prices, labor, or bidding equipment, overconditions. the contractors’ methods or overmaterials competitive or market Accordingly, GAI of determining bidnot prices, or over bidding or costs market cannot and does guarantee that competitive bids, proposals, or actual

tailed cost estimates prepared by GAI represent its judgment

conditions. Accordingly, GAI cannot and does not guarantee that bids, proposals, or actual costs will not vary from any statement of probable construction cost or other cost estimate prepared by it.

1

82 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING Any number of permits may be needed during the course of final design and construction of the trail and bikeway including but not limited to: • Wetland Identification/Stream Classification Conducted to identify the presence/absence of wetlands and streams, and provide an estimate of their extent. Methodology is outlined in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.

When unavoidable wetlands are present, a formal wetland delineation report is required to support permit applications.

• Chapter 105 Water Obstruction & Encroachment Permit Required for projects involving the construction, modification, relocation of any dam, water obstruction or encroachment to to jurisdictional waters of the Commonwealth. Any activity that disturbs a wetland, whether or not it is associated with filling or fill materials, requires a permit. a US Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit may also be required for certain construction activities in US waters.

• Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) Facilitates the avoidance and minimization of impacts to endangered and threatened and special concern species and resources in the Commonwealth. It applies to applicants for DEP permits, authorizations, and plan approvals.

• National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) The Federal Clean Water Act and the Pennsylvania Clean Streams law requires wastewater dischargers to have a permit establishing pollution limits, and specifying monitoring and reporting requirements.

NPDES permits regulate household and industrial wastes that are collected in sewers and treated at municipal wastewater treatment plants. Permits regulate discharges with the goals of protecting public health and aquatic life, and assuring that every facility treats wastewater.

• Archeological Phase I The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 reflected the broad-scale recognition of a need to protect cultural resources, defining historic preservation as “the protection, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction of districts, sites, buildings, structures and objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology or culture.”

A Phase I archaeological study is typically required to obtain other certain permits in order to proceed with a particular project. The Phase I archaeological reconnaissance survey is designed to merely identify the existence of any prehistoric or historic archaeological resources within a project area. The survey, typically involves preliminary background research, a pedestrian surface survey, an efficient subsurface testing strategy, analysis of recovered materials, and an interpretive report stating the results of research and testing.

• Highway Occupancy Permit Highway Occupancy Permits (HOPs) are required for any encroachment upon Interstate Highways, US Routes or State Highways in the Commonwealth.

Encroachment is usually in the form of occupancy of State highway right-of-way, opening the raodway surface, placing a facility or structure, or opening an access. It also extends beyond the right-of-way line where work outside the right-of-way may have an adverse effect on the State highway. Typically, HOPs are issued to utility companies, municipal authorities, developers and builders, and private citizens. HOP applications should be made at the County Permit Office located within the PennDOT County Maintenance Building in the county to which the application applies. It typically takes 10 days to 6 weeks for PennDOT to process an HOP permit application.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 83

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE Creating ownership within the community will foster responsibility to maintaining the trail, trailheads, and other amenities created because of the new trail (i.e. small pocket parks). This connection is just a small part of a greater trail system; trail owners are encouraged to reach out to adjoining trail groups to establish a relationship to create a global mechanism that shares responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and security.

Once the trail group structure has been established, trail monitors can be utilized. Trail monitors are volunteers that are 18 years or older that walk or ride the trail to assess the conditions of the trails and to ensure the trails are safe for public use. Trail monitors will travel the trail year round and receive training on trail monitoring. The trail monitor system once again fosters local ownership in the trail which in turn increases security keeping ATVs and other unauthorized vehicles off of the trail.

Another option for maintenance is PA CleanWays. This explanation of their mission is taken from their website (http://www.pacleanways.org/): PA CleanWays is a nonprofit organization that helps people who are ready to take action against illegal dumping and littering in their communities. Our core programs revolve around clean-

Inspecting the trail for damage

84 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

ups, adoptions and education. We carry out our mission in local communities through: • PA CleanWays chapters and affiliates; • Special projects like the Forest Lands Beautification Program; and • Programs that encourage everyone to join the fight against dumping and littering.

PA CleanWays’ mission is to eliminate illegal dumping and littering in Pennsylvania.

Common trail maintenance tasks include: • Asphalt Trail Surface Reparations – Repaving; sealing; pothole repair; snow removal; surface cleaning; markings maintenance; litter removal from trail shoulders.

• Non-asphalt Trail Surface Reparations – Resurfacing; grading; pothole repair; snow removal; surface cleaning; litter removal from trail shoulders.

• General Site Tasks – Mowing; leaf removal; tree pruning; tree removal; invasive species removal; planting new vegetation; application of herbicides and pesticides; clearing of drainage channels and culverts.

• Trailhead – Surface maintenance of parking; landscaping/gardening; trash removal; maintenance related to restrooms (if applicable).

• Trail Maintenance – trash can emptying; maintenance related to restrooms; information kiosk maintenance; maintenance of benches and other furnishings; signage; pavement markings; repair related to vandalism and illegal dumping; lighting; gates, bollards, and fencing; bridge maintenance.

According to the publication “Rail-Trail Maintenance & Operation”, owners of trails can expect an annual maintenance and operation cost of approximately $1,500 per mile, regardless of surface type. If operation and maintenance is primarily handled by volunteer groups, that number may be reduced to approximately $700 per mile.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Numerous grant opportunities existing for trail and bikeway planning and development. Primary sources are listed here for consideration: • Department of Conservation & Natural Resources (DCNR); http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/ 1. C2P2 Communitiy Recreation & Conservation These grants fund municipalities and nonprofit organizations to plan for, acquire, develop or rehabilitate public park, recreation, open space, greenway, trail and conservation areas, and facilities. A 50% match from the applicant is required for most projects. The maximum grant under this program is $40,000.

• Deadline: April 20, 2011 at 4:00 PM. • Contact: Grants Customer Service; 800-3267734; dcnr-grants@state.pa.us.

2. C2P2 Pennsylvania Recreation Trails These grants help develop and maintain recreational trails and related facilities for motorized and nonmotorized recreational trail use, and to purchase equipment for those purposes. Eligible applicants include federal and state agencies, local governments, and nonprofit and for profit organizations.

Match requirements are a minimum of 20% from the applicant except for acquisition projects, which require a 50% match. The maximum grant under this program is $100,000.

• Deadline: April 20, 2011 at 4:00 PM. • Contact: Grants Customer Service; 800-3267734; dcnr-grants@state.pa.us.

3. C2P2 Rails-to-Trails These grants help plan for, acquire, or develop railtrail corridors. Applicants include municipalities and nonprofit organizations established to preserve and protect available abandoned railroad corridors as trails. A 50% match is required, except for acquisition projects which require a donation match.

• Deadline: April 20, 2011 at 4:00 PM. • Contact: Grants Customer Service; 800-3267734; dcnr-grants@state.pa.us.

4. Growing Greener Investment of state funds to address Pennsylvania’s critical environmental concerns of the 21st century.

Growing Greener has helped to preserve farmlands; protect open space; maintain state parks; clean up abandoned mines; restore watersheds; provide funds for recreational trails and local parks; help communities address land use; and provide new and upgraded water and sewer systems.

• Deadline: April 20, 2011 at 4:00 PM. • Contact: Grants Customer Service; 800-3267734.

• Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT); http://www.dot.state.pa.us/ 1. Pennsylvania Community Transportation Initiative (PCTI) A competitive funding program to support and encourage local transporation projects that exemplify the goals of Smart Transportation. $24.7 million allocated in 2010 to 41 community-led planning and construction projects.

• Deadline: To be determined. 2010 deadline was September 15, 2011 at 5:00 PM. • Contact: PennDOT Center for Program Development and Management; 717-787-2862.

2. Transportation Enhancement Program (TE) Federal funding available for provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles, safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicycles, acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites, beautification, historic preservation, and preservation of rail corridors. It is a cost reimbursement program and not a grant program. The project sponsor (applicant) will receive periodic invoices from those working on the project. The sponsor must then review, approve, and forward the invoices to PennDOT. PennDOT then reimburses the sponsor who in turn must pay their service providers.

• Deadline: To be determined.

• Contact: PennDOT Center for Program Development and Management; 717-787-2862.

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 85

3. PennDOT Safe Routes to Schools Program Provides cost reimbusement funds to municipalities, school districts, and safety advocates for improvements to walking and biking routes that provide access to schools.

• Deadline: April 21, 2011.

• Contact: PA Safe Routes to School Coordinator; PennDOT Program Center; 717-787-8065.

• Federal Sources 1. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21) http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/ 2. Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) http://www.nps.gov/ 3. Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program http://www.nps.gov/ 4. US Department of Transportation FHWA National Scenic Byways Program http://fhwa.dot.gov/ 5. US Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/ 6. US Department of Education http://www.ed.gov/ 7. US Department of Health and Human Services http://www.hhs.gov/ 8. Federal Grant Opportunities http://www.grants.gov/ 9. Non-Profit Grant Opportunities http://www.usa.gov/business/nonprofit.shtml • State Sources 1. Heritage Park Grants http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/ 2. Pennsylvania Community Forests. http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/ 3. Rivers Conservation Program http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/ 4. Department of Community and Economic Development http://www.newpa.com/

86 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

• Other Sources 1. Tourism Grant Program http://www.co.westmoreland.pa.us/ 2. Community Foundation of Westmoreland County http://www.cfwestmoreland.org/ 3. American Hiking Society’s National Trails Fund http://www.americanhiking.org/ 4. Pennsylvania Recreation and Park Society (PRPS) RecTAP Program http://www.prps.org/ 5. Bikes Belong Coalition http://www.bikesbelong.org/

APPENDIX A:

Public Meeting

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 87

88 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 89

90 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

APPENDIX B:

PennDOT Coordination

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 91

RESPONSE TO PENNDOT’S COMMENTS North Route • Is there enough ROW to install the barrier and 10’ bike lane along Route 711?

We believe there is enough room within the existing ROW for Route 711 to install the shared use path by adjusting the striping of the vehicular travel lanes. This should be the first option explored during the implementation phase to determine if cross-sectional elements meet AASHTO Green Book design criteria. Another option is to designate that portion of Route 711, from LC&CC to the Township Building, as a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) because it would connect significant uses within the community. A third alternative would be to construct a new trail bridge, independent of the Route 711 vehicular bridge that connects LC&CC to Brigade Lane and Alternative Alignment 2. The report has been .

• The cross section of Route 711 should not be compromised; the barrier and bike lane should be in addition to the existing cross section.

Adding the shared use path and barrier on Route 711 should be further investigated during the implementation phase as noted above.

• There will have to be a maintenance agreement including winter maintenance for this bike lane. The Department will not be responsible for maintenance activities.

The cost of maintaining the shared use path will need to be further considered before construction of the facility.

A reporting system should be established so that route users can alert those responsible about facilities that are in need of maintenance. A contact person who can authorize maintenance work should be designated to receive the reports.

• Does the barrier meet the design criteria for the bicycle standards? Height and protection.

The barrier should be a minimum of 42 inches high to prevent bicyclists from toppling over it (taken from the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. 1999). This will be noted on the drawing on page 31.

West Route • The crosswalk on Route 30 at the intersection with PA 259 needs considered. If this is going to be a heavy crossing, what design features will need mitigation in order to cross safely.

The painted crosswalks on both eastbound and westbound Route 30 will be removed from the drawing on page 50 due to the absence of a traffic signal. Users of the shared use path will be alerted of the highway crossing with signs and markings as outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and AASHTO. Likewise, motorists will also be altered using the same standards contained in the MUTCD and AASHTO guidelines.

92 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

East Route • How will the shared-use path be separated from traffic in public ROW until it reaches PA 381?

The shared use path is separated from traffic by a 10-foot wide landscaped buffer. There is adequate room to install a 42-inch high vertical barrier if it is determined necessary during the implementation phase.

• What happens to the route at PA 381? Shown to just end? Where will the bicyclists continue?

The shared use path terminates at Route 381, which is currently designated as a signed shared roadway. Cyclists have the ability to continue to Linn Run State Park.

• Is there enough ROW on Route 30 to accommodate this path and the 10’ landscaped path?

Yes, we believe there is adequate room to accommodate the shared use path and landscape buffer within the existing ROW for Route 30. This option should be further investigated during the implementation phase.

• Any bike or shared-use lane or facility in Public ROW will need a maintenance agreement including winter maintenance.

The cost of maintaining the shared use path will need to be further considered before construction of the facility.

A reporting system should be established so that route users can alert those responsible about facilities that are in need of maintenance. A contact person who can authorize maintenance work should be designated to receive the reports.

South Route • Is there enough existing ROW to complete this work?

We believe there is enough room within the existing ROW for Route 711 to install the bike lanes by adjusting the striping of the vehicular travel lanes. This should be the first option explored during the implementation phase to determine if cross-sectional elements meet AASHTO Green Book design criteria. Another option is to designate that portion of Route 711, from Route 30 to the Boucher Lane, as a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”) because it would connect significant uses within the community. We recommend keeping the drawings in the report as-is, and adding text describing the signed shared roadway option.

• Does PA 711 meet the requirements to have a shared travel lane? Were crashes, truck traffic, ADT, etc., investigated?

The collection and/or analysis of traffic data was outside the scope of this report. This work would be included as part of the implementation phase. If it is not possible to install a bike lane, then the route would be designated as a signed shared roadway (“Share the Road”).

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 93

General Overall Comments • Any bike or shared-use lane or facility in Public ROW will need a maintenance agreement including winter maintenance.

The cost of maintaining the shared use path will need to be further considered before construction of the facility.

A reporting system should be established so that route users can alert those responsible about facilities that are in need of maintenance. A contact person who can authorize maintenance work should be designated to receive the reports.

• For shared lanes, has there been any investigation for Speeds, ADT, Truck Traffic, crash data investigated to ensure that this is safe and reasonable to recommend a shared use of the lanes?

The collection and/or analysis of traffic data was outside the scope of this report. This work would be included as part of moving forward with any implementation phase.

• Do all of the shared use lanes meet the criteria to incorporate on state and local roads?

The purpose of designating certain routes as signed shared roadways is because they provide continuity to other bicycle facilities and connect the community to high-demand uses in the area. The proposed routes also meet most of the criteria outlined on page 19 of the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities Routes. In addition, routes will be signed and marked as outlined in MUTCD and AASHTO. It appears that existing roadway shoulders on proposed shared roadways are at least 4 feet wide, the minimum width outlined in AASHTO. Width requirements to accommodate both bicycle and motor vehicles would be confirmed during any implementation phase. Other design upgrades may be deemed necessary to accommodate bike traffic including, but not limited to, bicycle-safe drainage grates, bridge expansion joints, and upgrading paved shoulders.

• Has the ROW been investigated along the state routes to ensure that the projected work can be incorporated or will additional ROW be included?

At this planning stage, it appears that the work outlined in the report can be done within the existing road ROWs. Additional ROW acquisition is not anticipated at this time.

94 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

APPENDIX C:

Property Coordination

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 95

MALLARD LN

B MU

RI G A DE

NIC

LN

IPA

0230

L PA RK

0030

DR

0231

0022

0235

HUM D LN

R LN

GBIR

MIN

JUNIPE

0233 0023

0024 0006

Property Owner

Parcel ID

NO SAPONE DAVID S JANE ME S

51-17-00-00-0235

L

51-17-00-00-0233

Location

LN

51-17-00-00-0006

HER

LN

LIGONIER CAMP & CONFERENCE N CEN

LUTHER P MILLER INC

BERRY

ELK

NORTH ROUTE

STRAW

SHYLOHS LN

11

E7 ROUT

104 MCCARTNEY CIR 3681 ROUTE 711 not listed

TIBERI JAMES V KATHRYN M

51-17-00-00-0030

not listed

CLAYCOMB IRA D & BERTHA J

51-17-00-00-0024

506 BRIGADE LN

CYPHERS MARY JEAN

51-17-00-00-0023

512 BRIGADE LN

KIMMICK WALTER D NANCY M

51-17-00-00-0231

532 BRIGADE LN

DUNLEVY DAVID L TAMARA M

51-17-00-00-0022

538 BRIGADE LN

BOYS BRIGADE CAMP ASSN

51-17-00-00-0230

not listed

96 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

WA LN U TS T

T

0084 0216 0078

0012

D ST

L FAIRFIE

BURD

ST

ST

TOWN ROUTE

Property Owner

ST

RE AWA

DEL

T RKE A M

Parcel ID

Location

BETHLEN HOME OF HUNG REF FED A

51-16-00-00-0078

205 KALASSAY DR

LIGONIER BORO SCHOOL DISTRICT

16-01-12-00-0012

not listed

WEST PENN POWER CO

51-16-12-00-0084

not listed

WEST PENN POWER CO

16-01-11-00-0216

310 BUNGER ST

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 97

MCG

CAREY SC

SPRINGER RD

HOOL RD

0073

3RD 2ND

0099

MAIN ST

WEST ROUTE Property Owner

Parcel ID

Location

BYERS TOSH POST 267 AMER LEGIO

51-16-00-00-0072

not listed

VALLEY YOUTH NETWORK

51-16-00-00-0099

20 SPRINGER RD

LIGONIER VALLEY SCH DIST AUTHO

51-16-00-00-0073

40 SPRINGER RD

T

N

S UT

L WA

98 | Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania

ST

UT ST

0072

ST

MATS ON R D

RRTEA.M30P to RTE. E 30W

D ORME R 0007 0011

R O U TE 2

IDLEWI

59

0110

LD LN ROU TE 30

0002

0062

WEST ROUTE Property Owner

DEED S

Parcel ID

Location

51-10-00-00-0011 51-10-00-00-0007

LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOC

51-16-00-00-0002

LOYALHANNA WATERSHED ASSOC

51-16-00-00-0110

not listed

GRAHAM RAYMOND REBA B

51-16-00-00-0062

2407 W

RD

YANARELLA MICHAEL E JR NADINE LINCOLN HIGHWAY HERITAGE CORR

not listed

129 ROUTE 259AMP not listed

RRTE. o t 3R0W T0EE. 3

Ligonier Valley Trail & Bikeway Feasibility Study — Ligonier, Pennsylvania | 99