Janusas Graphic Design Portfolio 2013

Page 1


T

OMAS JANUSAS email: tomasj@berkeley.edu web: tomasjan.com cell: 310-993-8912 Alma mater: University of California, Berkeley Skills:

Design: Adobe Creative Suite GIST: ArcGIS Code: Python Architecture: AutoCAD, Rhino, ScetchUp


T

able of Contents

URBAN PLANNING + URBAN DESIGN Corridor Revitalization 3-10 Vision of Tampines, Singapore 11-20 RESEARCH U.S.-Mex Border Study 21-26 Senior Thesis 27-32 GIS STUDIES BCDC Profile Analysis 33-36 Delta Stakeholder Study 37-38 Sea Level Rise 39-40 DESIGN + ARCHITECTURE Material Studio 41-44 Modeling Beach Shelter Design Concept 45-48 Tea House Design Concept 49-52 MISCELLANEOUS Software Modeling 54-56 Drafting and Sketching 57-59



N

orth California Corridor Revitalization

Instructor: Kim Suczynski Smith Planning Studio: Spring 2013 Institution: University of California, Berkeley Location: Walnut Creek, California Objective

The City of Walnut Creek is in the process of re-envisioning the West Downtown area. This proposal aims to take advantage of the opportunity and envisions North California Boulevard as a pedestrian-oriented corridor that seeks to enhance connections and meet the needs of nearby residents, office workers, and BART shoppers.









C

ar-Free Tropical City

Instructor: Prof. Kai Axhausen Future Cities: Networks and Grammars: Summer 2013 Institution: ETH Z端rich Future Cities Laboratory Location: Tampines, Singapore Vision

Design of a car-free tropical city in Singapore calls for a modular architecture layout throughout the whole project site in order to achieve a heterogenous street atmosphere. Disorderly modeling of units allows for voids and functional spaces to enhance a monotonous grid structure. Urban grammars and transportation network synchronization play a vital part in ensuring the accessibility and urbanity of the new cluster. Buildings, streets and layout coincide with and complement pedestrian movement around the city.











U

.S-Mexico Border Study

Instructor: Prof. Michael Dear Senior Thesis: Summer 2012 Institution: University of California, Berkeley Location: San Francisco, California Research Goal

This research sought to investigate the concept of colonias as the Third World phenomenon of informalities on the edge of First World territories. The journey began in the summer of 2012 when I received the Judith Lee Stronach Summer Travel Scholarship to explore poor migrant settlements near the U.S.-Mexico border. During my travels, I drove along the U.S.-Mexico border through the States of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas to study this phenomenon of underdevelopment. Read the blog for more information about this project


Geographic Representation of San Diego

Calexico

21%

88%

38,344

127 km

17 km

1,279,000

Tijuana

Mexicali

Douglas

El Paso

72%

64%

1,559,683

936,826

649,121

7 km

47 km

17,515

Agua Prieta

Ciudad Juรกrez

Laredo

Mc Allen

75%

66%

1,332,131

79,138

Nuevo Laredo 384,033

129,776 38 km

37 km

236,091

Reynosa 608,891


the U.S.-Mexico Border Cities San Luis

Nogales

83%

81%

19,573

28 km

12 km

24,909

San Luis Río Colorado

Heroica Nogales

Del Rio

Eagle Pass

69%

80%

178,380

220,292

Ciudad Acuña 136,755

26,668

12 km

23 km

26,682

Piedra Negras 152,806

Brownsville

74%

U.S City Population Scale

39 km

175,494

% Hispanic Mexican City Population

Matamoros 489,193

Sources: USGS Environmental Health Border Initiative. US Census Bureau. INEGI Scale: 1:500 000 m





T

he invisible Border in San Francisco’s Mission District Instructor: Prof. Michael Dear Senior Thesis Poster: Spring 2013 Institution: University of California, Berkeley Location: San Francisco, California Research Goal

Aesthetic, social and economic differences persist in urban environments despite the presence of any physical barriers. The goal of the research is to identify and visualize the “invisible border,” which hypotheticaly delineates the imaginary line evident in San Francisco’s Mission District, presumably between Valencia and Mission street corridors. Historical research, census analysis, field observations and GIS modeling are techniques used to confirm the hypothesis, that there is an “invisible border,” splitting the neighborhood into “new” and “old” Missions. The “invisible border,” although permeable and dynamic, is an effective barrier, which impedes neighborhood gentrification, cultural assimilation and social fabric disruption.







S

an Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Analysis Supervisor: Javier del Castillo Internship Project: Spring 2013 Institution: San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Location: San Francisco, California Objective

The main goal of the project is to conduct BCDC’s Profile Study based on the permit data available in organization’s GIS database. The posters aim to summarize the organization’s 44 years of accomplishments, show current trends and display data in a publicly friendly format. Also, summary of facts from the Bay Plan and Bay area relevant to BCDC’s sphere of influence are info-graphed for a quick reference.


SAN FRANC CONSERVATION AND DEV

1969 44

1969 Established 44 Years Active Established

SAN FRANCISCO BAY

Original Size

REPRESENTATIVES

Years Active

27

BCDC Commission Appointments

Current Size

511

806

Sq. Miles

Sq. Miles

REPRESENTATIVES

PUBLIC

LOCAL Government STATE

US Army Corps of Engineers

US Environmental Protection Agency

Ownership

9 Government LOCAL

Population

San Francisco San Mateo

825,863 739,311

1,837,504

22% 50%

Size Square Miles

46.9

448.4

Santa Clara

STATE

Legend

SF Bay regional Water Contra CostaQuality Board 739

State Cities and Counties Private Federal

715.9

1,079,597

420,757

139,045

Solano

821.8

Napa

748.4

US Army Sonoma Corps of Engineers 491,829

1575.9

256,069

500,000

1000000

1500000

2000000

0

Marin

520.3

0

500

1000

1500

US Environmental Protection Agency Cities

Population

945,942 214,089

Counties 805,235

144,186 115,942

56.4

San Francisco

47.6

Hayward

44.3

30.1

Novato

27.9

64,403

Palo Alto

23.7

140,081

Sunnyvale

21.9 21.9

739,311 Redwood City

57,713

San Rafael

16.7

84,950

San Leandro

13.1

26,997

Benicia

13.1

97,207

San Mateo

12.5

35,824

Martinez

12.3

74,066

Mountain View

12.1

73,812

420,757 Alameda

10.9

1,079,597

112,580

1mln

76.9

Richmond

76,815

1,554,720

Fremont

Population

825,863

600,000

Napa River Sonoma Creek

176.8

Oakland

Berkeley

200,000

491,829

9

100

Petaluma River Tolay Creek Corte Madera Creek

San Francisco San Mateo

Legend Length in Miles Napa River

Coyote Creek

Petaluma River Sonoma Creek

Redwood Creek

Corte Madera Creek Tolay Creek

Plummer Creek

46.9

Bay Trail

AlamedaEstablished

Contra Costa 1987 Solano 150

Napa

200

Sonoma

0

20

40

60

80

100

Size Square Miles Coyote Creek

Redwood Creek

Plummer Creek

448.4

Santa Clara

10.5

139,045 50

497miles

Waterways

JURISDICTION 30.7

51,904

2000

Size Square Miles

Valejo

103,701

1,837,504

47

San Jose

390,724

23%

1290.1

Alameda

1,554,720

Shoreline Perimeter

5%

JURISDICTION PUBLIC Counties

40%

TOTAL REDUCTION*

27

BCDC Commission Appointments

SF Bay regional Water Quality Board

1290.1

Total

739 715.9

500miles

821.8

Completed

330miles

Sources: San Francisco Bay Plan. http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/laws_plans/plans/sfbay_plan.shtml San Francisco Bay Trail. http://baytrail.abag.ca.gov/ 2012 US Census. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html

748.4

1575.9


CISCO BAY VELOPMENT COMMISSION 2

!

!

! !

! ! !!! ! ! !

!

!

!!!! ! ! !!!!!! !!! !

! ! !!! !

!

! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !

! !

! !! !! ! ! !

!! !

!

!!

Minor Permits Issued

! !! !

Sq. Miles

400 2005

2006 2007

2008

2009

2010 2011

2012

Minor Permits Issued Non Material Amendments

TOTAL MINORS !! !!! !

TOTAL NON MATERIAL AMENDMENTS

! !

Minor Permits

39 140

200 0

15 12

! !! !

6

! !! ! !

!

! ! !!!! ! !! !

! ! ! !!

!

! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! !

! !

!

!!!! !

5%

2005

2006 2007

!

!

2012

!

!! !

!!

! !

Consistency Determinations

TOTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AMENDMENTS

in Miles 50%Public Access 23% 111.6

80

0

3

6

12

4%

5

162

TOTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS*

*1966- 2013 to date

Region wide Permits and Emergencies 30 25 20 15

33.3

30.6

Legend Public Access

Marin

Napa

Sonoma

% Public Access

19

13

46%

82.8

40

0

*1966- 2013 to date

% Fill

28

60

20

3021 40%

TOTAL MINORS*

47%

% Public Access Completed

120 100

13%

34

10

TOTAL CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS

! ! !

! !!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!

2010 2011

71 22%85

!

!

!

2009

New Consistency Determinations Consistency Determination Amendments

!

! !

2008

33

Shoreline Perimeter

42

20

45.1

36

16.8

10 5

0.4

3.7

State Cities and Counties Private Federal

Marin

!

3

!

Napa

!

47

Consistency Determinations per County

30

Sonoma

! ! !

40

9

!

Solano

!

!

San Mateo

!

!

! !! !! !

!

! !

! !

!!!

!

Alameda

! !

!

50

Ownership

!

!

! !!

!

Santa Clara

!

!

San Francisco

!!

Contra Costa

! !

!

44

61%

% Public Access

418

376

319

283

TOTAL REDUCTION*

Consistency Determinations !

628

*1966- 2013 to date

% Fill

873

600

30

!

Sq. Miles

800

60

564

TOTAL MAJORS*

511

1000

90

0

51%

Minor Permits per County

120

!

!! !!! !! ! ! !!! !! ! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!! ! !! !! !! !!! ! !! !!! !! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !!!!! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!! !!! ! !!!! ! !!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!! !!! ! !!! !!!! !! !!!!! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!! ! ! !! !! !!!! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! !! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!!! ! ! !!!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! ! !! !!!! !! !! !!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! ! ! !!!! !! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! !!!!!! !!!! ! !! ! !! !!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !!!!!! ! !! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !! !!! ! !!!!!! !!! !!! ! !! ! !!!!!! !!!! ! ! ! !!!! !!!! !!!!! !!!!!! !! !!!!!!!! !! !! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!! ! ! !! ! !! !! ! !!!!!! ! !! ! !!! !! !!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!! ! !! ! !!! !! !!! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! !! !!!!! !! !! !! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !! ! !! !! !! ! !!! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!!! !!! ! ! !!!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! !!!!! ! !! !! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! !! !!!! ! !! ! !! ! !

806

150

!!

!! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! !! ! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!!!! ! !! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! !! ! !!!! ! ! !! !!!!!! ! ! ! !!! !! !!! ! ! !!!!! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! !! !!!! !! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!! !!!!! !! !! !! ! !!!!!!!! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!

!

!! ! ! !!! !!! !! ! !

4

Marin

! ! !

50 21

TOTAL MATERIAL AMENDMENTS

!

! ! !

!

3

13

Marin

!!!

0

Sonoma

!

! !! !

% Public Access

30

Sonoma

! !

Current Size 50

2012

Solano

!

!

Major Permits Bay Area Counties The Bay

!

2011

TOTAL MAJORS

!

!

!

!

2009 2010

Solano

!

!! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! !!

!!

2008

Napa

!

!

!

!!

2007

Major Permits Issued Material Amendments !

! !!

60

2006

Alameda

! !!! !!!!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !!!!!!!! !! ! !

2005

Napa

0

!!!!!! !

Solano

! ! !!

Alameda

!! ! !!! !!!!!! !! ! ! !

86

Contra Costa

! !!

!!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !!!! ! ! ! !! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!! !! !!! !!!!! ! ! !! ! !! !! !!!!!! !! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! !! !! !! ! ! !!! !!! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!

69%

104

88

Alameda

!! !

!

76

Contra Costa

! !! ! ! !!

! !! ! ! !! !!!! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! ! ! !! !!! !!! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! !

!

!

Contra Costa

Original Size !!

San Mateo

!

90

4

!

Santa Clara

! ! !!! !!

120

6

!!!

Santa Clara

!

!

! ! ! !!

!!!

!

Santa Clara

! !

!

! !! ! !!!! ! ! ! !! ! !!! !! ! !! !

!

San Francisco

!!!

!! !

!

! ! ! !! ! ! !

San Mateo

!

!!!

!!

140

San Francisco

! !! ! ! !!

!

% Fill

Major Permits per County

150

8

!!

! !!

Major Permits Issued

SAN FRANCISCO BAY 10

!! ! ! !

San Mateo

!

!

!

San Francisco

!!!! ! !

TOTAL PUBLIC ACCESS*

360

0

2005

2006 2007

2008

2009

2010 2011 2012

Region wide Permits Emergency Permits

178 497miles 15

MILES

*1966- 2013 to date

TOTAL REGION WIDE PERMITS

TOTAL EMERGENCY PERMITS







A

rchitectural Design + Modeling

Instructor: Prof. Deborah Bird Studio: Spring 2011 Institution: Pasadena City College Location: Los Angeles, California Project Description

The following projects are a result of architecture studios taken while at Pasadena City College. Project (1) Beach Shelter Conceptual Design. Project (2) Small Infill Site Development in Pasadena, CA.













A

rchitectural Drafting + Scetching

Instructors: Prof. Dionicio Valdez and Prof. Elizabeth McDonald Studios: Spring 2011-2013 Institution: PCC and UC Berkeley Location: San Francisco, California Project Description

The following projects are a result of architecture and urban design studios taken while at Pasadena City College and UC Berkeley . Project (1) Modeling with AutoCAD and Rhino software.

Project (2) Hand drafting and drawing. Project (3) Various building and street section scetches.






T

omas Janusas

email: tomasj@berkeley.edu web: tomasjan.com 2013


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.