Evaluation form Paper submitted to Neofilolog No. …… Title: ............................................................................................................................................. Reviewer: .....................................................................................................................................
1. Does the title reflect the content of the paper?: ........................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................... 2. Evaluation of the structure of the paper (does it have a clearly defined aim, does it describe in detail the research procedures, does it include appropriate hypotheses and conclusions?): .... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... 3. Evaluation of content (including the quality of the abstract): .................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... 4. Is the approach new and, if so, to what extent?: ...................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... 5. Evaluation of the literature used: ............................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... 6. Decision (1 – it should be published; 2 – it should be published with changes suggested; 3 – it should be rewritten and resubmitted; 4 – it should be rejected): .............................................. ....................................................................................................................................................... 7. Comments: ...............................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................
Date …………………… Signature ……………………..