Daily Toreador The
TUESDAY, NOV. 6, 2012 VOLUME 87 ■ ISSUE 51
twitter.com/DailyToreador
www.dailytoreador.com
Serving the Texas Tech University community since 1925
Combined 538 electoral votes. Candidate needs 270 to win election. 95 electoral votes are considered toss-ups. Romney is projected to receive 206 electoral votes.
Obama is projected to receive 237 electoral votes.
Four Corners
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY RASMUSSEN REPORTS
INFORMATION UP-TO-DATE AS OF PRESS TIME
A look into issues associated with the 2012 Presidential Election
Economy: With the unemployment rate at 7.9 percent and the national deficit at more than $16 trillion, the economic differences between President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney have been the focal point of the 2012 elections. According to the Obama campaign, the United States has been experiencing 32 consecutive months of job growth and 5.4 million new jobs in the private sector. However, these figures may be a bit deceiving, Ronald Gilbert, Ph.D., and associate professor in the Department of Economics, said. “We’ve had very mediocre results,” Gilbert said. “High unemployment rates, very low economic growth rates, no increase in standard of living, and all we got out of it (was) a very dismal outlook on the future.” Gilbert said it is obscure for the president to take any credit for job creation. He said government spending has grown about 16 percent per year since Obama took office, and the American people have seen nothing to show for it. “The government sector is the cause of these problems,” Gilbert said. “The government sector is never the solution to any economic problem.”
Obama
Throughout the debates, most of the differences between the candidates have been in their tax plans. “My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class,” Romney said during the first debate. “But I’m not going to reduce the share of taxes paid by high-income people. High-income people are doing just fine in this economy. They’ll do fine whether you’re president or I am.” According to Romney’s tax plan, his goal is to maintain current tax rates on interest, dividends and capital gains, while making a permanent 20 percent cut in the marginal rates. Gilbert said a 20 percent tax decrease is unrealistic, and if that is Romney’s plan, he will have a difficult time enacting it. During the first debate, the president said Romney’s tax plan would enact $5 trillion in new tax cuts that are geared toward millionaires and billionaires, not the middle class. “The fact is that if you are lowering the rates the way you described,” Obama told Romney during the debate, “Governor, then it is not possible to come up with enough deductions and loopholes that only affect high-income individuals to avoid either raising the deficit or burdening the middle class. It’s math. It’s arithmetic.”
Anyone who watched the third presidential debate about foreign policy probably had a reaction similar to this: “How are these candidates any different?” That is an accurate response because the debate was two hours of President Barack Obama discussing his accomplishments and the current policies he has on foreign policy, while Governor Mitt Romney praised Obama’s record on foreign policy and discussed few changes he would make if elected. Dennis Patterson, Ph.D., an associate professor of political science at Texas Tech, said the president has been trying to show why he is better on foreign policy than the challenger, while Romney’s goal was to draw few distinctions and render Obama’s accomplishments in foreign affairs as an irrelevant criterion of choice. “There are really a very few differences,” Patterson said. “When it comes to protecting America, people are in agreement. There might be some slight differences. The truth is, I don’t see Romney going and starting a war with Iran, I don’t see him doing anything different in Bengasi, and I don’t see him doing anything different in China, despite his rhetoric.” There may be a few stylistic differences, Patterson said, but most of them are aimed toward
STAFF WRITER
Obama • Create incentives for business to manufacture in America • Increase taxes on households making more than $1 million • Invest in manufacturing and infrastructure • Support equal opportunity
Romney • Make a 20 percent tax cut in marginal rates • Cut corporate taxes to 25 percent • Set federal government’s cap spending at 20 percent of GDP • Cut the red tape
ECONOMY continued on Page 5 ➤➤
• Bring home troops from Afghanistan by 2014 • Rebuild the United States’ international relations • Pursue a world without nuclear weapons • Increase non-military aid to Pakistan
Foreign Policy:
STORIES BY MATT DOTRAY
Education: As the budget deficit continues to loom over the heads of American citizens like a dark cloud, the financial distribution for education continues to be an important issue. The education system in the United States is unique. Along with federal oversight, the local and state governments have authority over education as well, making the role of the executive office less important than most voters think. However, Peggy Johnson, Ph.D., the associate dean for Teacher Education, said the federal government’s role has been growing. Through programs like No Child Left Behind, Johnson said the federal government has enhanced beneficial practices and provided support for children who have not been served by public schools well. Despite party affiliation, she said financial support for education needs to be a top priority. Education is not only vital for those who are being educated, Johnson said, but it also is vital for society and the strength of the country. “We spend money, so we have to decide what to spend it on,” Johnson said. “It seems to me that investing in the future of the country through the education of its children makes a lot of sense.”
Both candidates understand the importance of education, and both agree that providing more training for teachers and improving schools has an important place in fixing the nation’s economy. Yet, their plans to enact these changes are a little different. Making education a federal funding priority has been a major platform of President Barack Obama’s campaign. During the final debate, Obama said an increase in government funding for teachers would determine whether or not new businesses are created in the United States. According to Obama’s website, his plan for K-12 education is to strengthen public schools, prevent teacher layoffs and expand Race to the Top, also while giving states the flexibility to make local solutions. Race to the Top will cause states to raise their standards for college and career readiness, his campaign says, and has a plan to recruit 100,000 science and math teachers. Obama’s budget plan for the 2013 fiscal year includes a $14 billion one-time investment for education programs and increasing college affordability, the U.S. Department of Education says. Governor Mitt Romney has responded to the president’s attacks regarding Romney’s purported disbelief in the importance of class size. EDUCATION continued on Page 5 ➤➤
Romney
Romney
• Increase sanction pressure on Iran • Pursue market-based economic relations with South America • Work closely with Israel • Proposed $2 trillion addition to military spending
Obama
• Promoting school choice • Reform No Child Left Behind by emphasizing responsibility • Encourage private sector participation in financial aid • Look for cuts in education spending
• Increase investment in public schools • Continue the Race to the Top initiative • Goal to cut tuition in half in the next decade • Continue the repayment cap on federal student loans at 10 percent
Social Issues:
“I think the one thing to note is that, with the availability of three (judges) going away, is that President Barack Obama has already appointed two,” Kitchen said. “So when you think about it, let’s say he won re-election; he would have the availability to appoint five (judges), which is the majority on the Supreme Court. So I’d say that’s a big deal in social issues.” According to Obama’s website, in his four years at the White House, he has signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to fight pay discrimination, aided women’s accessibility to birth control with the Affordable Care Act, endorsed same-sex marriage, and urged Congress to pass the DREAM Act. Brenda Cruz, a senior political science major from Laredo and former secretary of the Tech Student Democrats, said the Democratic Party is more welcoming in terms of social issues. “I feel that, in general, Democrats are more able to emphasize with any person — man, wom(an), child or anyone,” she said. “I feel that we don’t see solutions as a whole. We feel that to understand a problem or a solution, we need to really talk to the person and get to know why they feel that way and what options are out there for them.”
pleasing constituents. An example of this would be with Israel, where Romney has tried to show himself as the defender of Israel, he said. The fact of the matter is the United States has already established a strong foreign policy apparatus, Patterson said, and there are a lot of think tanks on both sides of the political spectrum. “They’re all producing papers,” Patterson said. “You’ve got people running around Capitol Hill, all producing papers with all these very well funded institutes. One may be a little bit more conservative than the other, but they are all designed to do the same thing.” Beneath the surface, there are minor differences in terms of foreign policy between the two presidential candidates. John Barkdull, Ph.D., a political science professor who specializes in international relations theory, international organization and international ethics, said the major differences are in defense spending and trade with China. As far as defense spending, Barkdull said Romney wants to raise defense spending much more than Obama, whose defense budget will rise, but at a rate that is much more parallel to the budget. Whether or not an increase in the defense budget is needed is a different debate within itself, Barkdull said, but Romney believes the services and equipment need replenishing.
Romney • Defend the Defense of Marriage Act • End federal funding for abortion advocates • Veto the DREAM Act • Support the role of the state on social issues
Obama • Support the DREAM ACT • Continue to support same-sex marriage • Favor legal right to abortion • Continue to require insurers to offer contraception for women
FOREIGN continued on Page 5 ➤➤
When it comes to social issues, most voters know where the candidates and their respected party stand. Social issues have historically been prominent topics during presidential debates, but it appears they have taken a back seat to economic discussions throughout this election. Jeramy Kitchen, a senior political science major from Meadows Place, and the executive director for the Texas Tech Young Conservatives, said most voters are focused on jobs and the economy. “I definitely agree that people wouldn’t say social issues are more important than the economy and jobs right now,” Kitchen said, “but I do think there is the possibility of it being a huge deal, depending on what happens on Nov. 6.” In the United States, social issues in elections typically revolve around abortion, contraception, same-sex marriage and immigration. Although the issues are not getting much coverage at the moment, Kitchen said they have the potential to become more important than ever. He said a lot of analysts believe three Supreme Court Justices might retire in the next presidential four-year cycle.
SOCIAL continued on Page 5 ➤➤
DESIGN BY KASSIDY KETRON
INDEX Classifieds................7 Crossword.................2 La Vida........................6 Opinions.....................4 Sports........................7 Sudoku.......................6 EDITORIAL: 806-742-3393
WEATHER Today
Sunny
78
Wednesday
81
45
ADVERTISING: 806-742-3384
Sunny
BUSINESS: 806-742-3388
Introducing
The Daily Toreador for iPhone, iPad and Android
Get the latest news, sports, opinions and weather all at your fingertips.
48
Reynolds: Civility, repsect, maturity necessary in politics OPINIONS, Pg. 4 FAX: 806-742-2434
CIRCULATION: 806-742-3388
DT
Twitter Follow The DT @dailytoreador
EMAIL: news@dailytoreador.com