Over two trillion dollars in business assets have become vulnerable due to the mass exodus of small businesses in Canada

across all sectors.

7% of Canadian small and medium businesses have begun to develop exit strategies from their business within the next ten years. According to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), over two trillion dollars in business assets have become vulnerable due to the mass exodus of small businesses in Canada.

Most of these entrepreneurs mention retirement (75%) as their main reason to exit their business. 22% wish to leave due to the stresses of business, while another 22% wish to take a step back from running and investing in their firms. 9% wish to transition their business to a different industry or busi- ness model. Banking institutions and lawyer firms are busy assisting millions of business owners across North America and the Caribbean to plan business successions, or businesses ultimate closure or sale. Finding an appropriate successor or buyer is difficult indeed. Over 43% of entrepreneurs find it challenging to measure the value of their business while 39% feel their enterprises are far too dependent upon their owners for daily operations.

The government of Canada passed Bill C-208 in 2021, allowing SME to sell their business shares to family, taking the exemption of lifetime capital gains of the sale.

Many enterprising businesspeople would prefer to start up an enterprise instead of buying into an existing one. They can personalize their business and not walk into existing problems. CFIB has found that 49% of those who wish to leave their present establishment, wish to start a new business entirely.

50% of business owners make less revenue today than they did in 2021, with 64% still struggling with post pandemic debt, and 77% continue to be pandemic anxious. Business has become a pressure cooker with fears the economy can stumble into a recession at any time.

“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.”

Jeremy Jurgens, WEF Managing Director

It is always so interesting what mainstream media views as important to report. As a media source, we began to warn about the 2020 pandemic in 2019, and our warnings were mostly ignored. As a responsible media outlet, we shared what was coming down the pipeline once we had heard what was in store. This week, we are going to share another exercise that has been implemented by the World Economic Forum, one that would devastate world economies, and one that was quietly done, just as planning for the pandemic was done before.

This tabletop exercise was conducted on October 18th, 2019. I want you to pay close attention to this because the writing has always been on the wall. Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic.

The disease started in pig farms in Brazil (markets in Wuhan), quietly and slowly at first, but then it started to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings. When it started to spread efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely packed neighborhoods of some of the megacities in South America, the epidemic exploded. It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries were able to control it, it continued to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country could maintain control.

There was no possibility of a vac- cine being available in the first year. There was a fictional antiviral drug that could help the sick, but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population was susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increased exponentially, doubling every week. As the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths. The pandemic slowed due to the decreasing number of susceptible people. The pandemic continued at some rate until there was an effective vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population had been exposed. From that point on, it was likely to be an endemic childhood disease.

Hmmmm! I want people to stop here for a moment and read that section again before I move on. How were these world leaders so able to distinctly predict exactly what we went through during the pandemic, and still not be prepared. They knew what was going to happen, yet our governments acted so surprised by it.

Hmmmm! Now, I am going to report on something that was discussed in July of 2021, and the only reason that I am bringing this to everyone’s attention is because the first time they warned us about something, THE WORLD DID NOT LISTEN! If you read the above exercise, it played out exactly as the predicted (no coincidence there), yet when we initially reported on it, we were discredited, censored, called conspiracy theorists, and basically ignored.

Let’s try this again, community. They are forcing this idea of a digital life on us: digital id’s, cashless societies, smart cities, electric vehicles, all the while they have begun to prepare for what they call a “Cyber Pandemic.”

What would you do if you couldn’t access your bank accounts, the internet, or your cell phone suddenly stopped working? These are the kinds of things people really do need to think through because one day we may be facing a crisis like that.

The World Economic Forum kicked off its annual Cyber Polygon in July 2021, which gave companies and governments the opportunity to participate in a simulation of a “Cyber Pandemic”. It was a practice session in which they got to brainstorm a scenario, how it would affect the world economy, how it might affect individual corporations and what could be done to protect them.

The participants of the conference were:

• Sberbank CEO and Chairman of the Executive Board Herman Gref

• Inventor and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak

• President of the International Committee of the Red Cross Peter Maurer

• INTERPOL Secretary-General Jürgen Stock

• President of Mastercard Europe Mark Barnett

• Deputy Governor of the Bank of Russia Alexey Zabotkin

Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Martin Schwab was the event’s special guest, and the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Mikhail Mishustin addressed the participants. There was also a remote interview with Russian astronauts Oleg Novitsky and Pyotr Dubrov, who were joining in from the ISS.

During this exercise they discussed why we should prepare for a COVID-like global cyber pandemic that will spread faster and further than a biological virus, with an equal or greater economic impact.

The coronavirus crisis provided insights into how leaders can better prepare for such cyber risks. They state clearly that a cyber pandemic is probably as inevitable as a future disease pandemic. The time to start thinking about the response is – as always – yesterday.

Before we move forward, I have a question for you; if they are saying that a cyber pandemic is inevitable, then why are they pushing us towards digitizing everything? Why not keep tangible assets (money, gold, silver, platinum, copper) around so that if a cyber-attack was to happen, people would not be left stranded with no access to their funds?

They state that a cyber-attack with characteristics similar to the coronavirus would spread faster and further than any biological virus. The cyber equivalent of COVID-19 would be a self-propagating attack using one or more “zero-day” exploits, techniques for which patches, and specific antivirus software signatures are not yet available. Most likely, it would attack all devices running a single, common operating system or application.

The economic impact of a widespread digital shutdown would be of the same; the end result: millions of devices would be taken offline in a matter of days.

The only way to stop the exponential propagation of cyber-COVID would be to fully disconnect all vulnerable devices from one another and the internet to avoid infection. The whole world could experience cyber lockdown until a digital vaccine was developed.

A digital vaccine; really?

Cyber lockdown would also introduce novel challenges for digitally dependent economies. During the 2020 Australian bushfires, power outages and damage to mobile phone infrastructure gave citizens a newfound appreciation for battery-operated FM radios. If cyber-COVID ravaged a country, which radio stations would still operate without digital recording and transmission systems?

Recovery from the widespread destruction of digital systems would be extremely challenging.

Replacing 5% of the world’s connected devices would require around 71 million new devices. It would be impossible for manufacturers to rapidly scale up production to meet demand.

Widespread, systemic cyberattacks are not just possible or plausible; they should be anticipated. As we have seen with COVID-19, even a short delay in the response can cause exponential damage.

I find it interesting that at the end of the World Economic Forum release they state, “Let’s be better prepared for that one.” How by introducing digital id’s? Community, it is time that we take control of our destiny. We have to take a stand against the digital invasion that is going to leave us floundering. Start to stockpile your tangible resources, just like I had instructed about stocking up food. Stop relying so heavily on debit cards, your phones and computers. Yes, technology is great, but if used against us, it will be devastating. You have all been warned.

There has never been a time where I have witnessed psychological abuse at the level that we are experiencing right now, and it is happening without us even realizing it. Our global nations are being manipulated and controlled by a narcissistic and sociopathic regime that utilizes our government as their puppets, who then inflict the same abuse on us, global citizens of planet earth.

Mind control can occur in any system; the ingredients: human beings, and narcissistic leader(s). What can’t be allowed in this type of system is free thinkers or free spirits. People with these qualities are quickly lost in what is now termed as the cancel culture. They are made to look evil, ridiculous; they are called conspiracy theorists, and they are censored on every level.

What is truly unfortunate is that many of us are out here thinking that we are in control of our thinking; we actually tended your post-secondary school.

During my research on this topic, I came across a clinical psychologist by the name of Margaret Singer. She was a nationally renowned expert on cults, brainwashing, and persuasion; she was an active consultant and expert witness in numerous legal cases.

She speaks extensively on people who use their role and power to exploit the trust, dependency, and fear of others. They use this power to deceptively gain control over the decision making of a person. Like I noted earlier, it has nothing to do with intelligence: the more cognitively impaired someone is, the more easily they can be manipulated. Think about all the talk we have heard about the pandemic causing severe mental health challenges for people; think about how impaired many of us have become without even realizing it.

You can make anybody believe almost anything if you are enough of a con artist. Our government has utilized a system of rewards, punishments, and experiences in order to promote belief systems and group-approved behaviors like: mask wearing and injecting yourself with an untested, and dangerous vaccine.

Those who conformed or were coerced were rewarded for proper performance with social and sometimes material reinforcement (pizza, tickets to sports events, concert tickets, money, and even sex). If you were slow to learn or non-compliant; you were threatened with shunning, banning and punishment; which included loss of self-esteem, privileges, and status (cancel culture).

Governments around the world put forth a closed system of logic and an authoritarian structure that permitted no feedback and refused to be modified except by leadership approval or executive order. Our governments used the six conditions that Dr Singer (2003) outlined a person must be subjected to in order for mind control to happen. Let’s take a look at the six conditions and see if you can identify them in what you have experienced in the last few years.

Keep the target in the dark, unaware that he/she is being changed

Many of us were psychologically led to change their behaviors in order to meet the agenda of the leader (lockdowns, mask wearing). The end goal is for the target to do the bidding of the leader. The end goal is to fulfill the leader’s personal needs for power and control and even to fulfill his/her ultimate fantasies.

Control the person’s physical and social environment

Leaders of mind-control provide ample structure, rules, and assignments to keep targets constantly on task (stand six feet apart, wash your hands, wear a mask or face covering).

Create a sense of powerlessness in the target

As our sense of powerlessness increased, our sense of good judgment and understanding of the world decreased (view of reality is destabilized).

Incorporate a system of rewards and punishments in the person’s life; ones that promote the manipulator’s agenda, and undermine the target’s autonomy and individuality

Individuals who took the vaccine, and wore a mask got positive feedback for conforming to the government’s beliefs and behaviors and negative feedback for old beliefs and behavior.

Create a system of rewards, punishments, and experiences in order to promote learning the groups ideology or belief system and group-approved behaviors

Good behavior: demonstrating an understanding and acceptance of the group’s beliefs, and compliance was rewarded, while questioning, expressing doubts or criticizing was met with disapproval, redress and possible rejection. If you even tried to question what was happening, you were made to feel that there was something inherently wrong with you.

The system is closed, with an authoritarian structure that allows no feedback and refuses input not approved of by leadership approval

The government is run as a top-down, pyramid structure. They never lose, they just change the rules.

I want to remind you that this all happened very slowly. I don’t want anyone to feel bad reading this; awareness is key. Stay vigilant and begin to open your eyes to what is really happening in this world.

• Trying to decrease unemployment

With The Application Of Job Creation Schemes

Due to the pandemic, buy safety tools, have vaccines fabricated and made available to us all

Give each and every member of the federal public sector wage hikes

Buy new equipment to replace many aged planes, trains and automobiles

COVID-19 gave as well as it took away. In some instances, it took our freedom of choice and many people’s health and lives too. It gave CERB to individuals and businesses to try and survive the pandemic’s effects and the government’s responses to fight it. We had relatively low interest rates, giving those who bank little returns, but also allowing others to cheaply borrow. Then those who run our financial institutions declared an end to the serious part of the pandemic. You can get sick, but possibly not die from it. The money markets, banking institutions and Federal Bank decided to jump start the economy by raising interest rates as a way to control inflation and drive prices downward. They wanted to get back to normal business. What they created was a schizophrenic economy, unable to function and grow as they so hoped.

Inflation dropped slowly while many prices, particularly those of essential items, rose non-stop. Sure the price of a house dropped a bit, but what you needed for dinner increased. Our politicians felt the need to act, and so they did, while they live outside of the lifestyle most of us experience.

In fact, federal authorities are chasing those who may have received more than was their right, pursuing individuals and businesses that have claimed CERB while possibly not deserving to receive it. Various provincial governments and municipalities have increased their taxes and service charges drastically. The federal government refuses to give billions to provinces who cannot or are unwilling to prove where the funds are going.

The light that is at the end of the tunnel has arrived, and those in need will especially feel its bright denying lights. What do governments do when the books need to be cleaned up? Look at the Mike Harris government for example. Winning the election, defeating a N.D.P. administration who tried to spend funds on progressively accepted services, the Conservatives of old cut and denied services to those most in need, closing institutions and hospitals so that the books could be balanced. Very different from the Ford Conservatives you may say? Ford’s Conservatives are sitting on billions of dollars given to them by the federal government to fight COVID-19. While Premier Ford is in many ways a Liberal minded conservative, he is a conservative nonetheless.

The Big Giveaway has ended. The new words in Queens Park (Ontario) or any local or state government will be: moderation, restraint, financial moderation or perhaps cost control. The government will spend millions of dollars to persuade us that costs are too high; the public’s pocket book is bare. It is time for a little restraint folks. What is interesting is that the spendthrifts tell those who pay the bills it’s time to open our wallets with humility.