mRNA gene therapy poisoning in our food: Who is responsible and what to do about it

and Pfizer themselves, the COVID injection is gene- therapy,” attorney Tom Renz revealed.

Renz told a story of helping draft a disclosure and transparency Bill in the state of Missouri. Bill -1169 was supposed to have Big Pharma companies come clean about the content of their product, but instead, Big Pharma went to buy off the: beef, pork, corn growers, soya bean growers, and egg production people one by one.

All this was done when the enemies of the state realized that they could not get around this bill. It’s important to note that the two largest holders of eggs in this country are Bill Gates and the CCP (aka the Chinese Communist Party). “Bill –1169 is the most hotly contested Bill,” said Renz.

Attorney Tom Renz says, “To be clear - at this point, zero states are requiring informed consent for ‘vaccine food.’ While I would argue that it must be done under existing law, I absolutely do not believe that will happen.”

Dr. Naomi Wolf said it best, “Buy up the farmlands, leave people unable to grow their own food, raise their own cattle, and then you have to eat the Frankenfood that has been contaminated by Bill Gates and China, it is horrific.”

The mRNA poisoning of the food supply is not a one-state or country thing. Even though Missouri could be the first to roll them out, many states are moving to allow mRNA injections into cattle for various reasons. One does not have to be an “anti-vaxxer” to appreciate the risks inherent in introducing experimental drugs into the food supply.

Amid protests, however, the new mRNA jabs for cattle may be introduced into some herds this month. According to radio host Hal Turner, “The food supply of every American is going to start being intentionally poisoned with mRNA genetic modifications being fraudulently called ‘vaccines.’ This tampering with the food supply is not just by mRNA injections. The climate change lobby has prompted Great Britain to act against beef cattle with ‘methane suppressants’ in an effort to fundamentally change the digestive systems of these cows, the reason being, cows are passing too much poisonous gasses. You just can’t make this up. For anyone who believes governments these days, it is said that methane is released into the air whenever cows belch or fart, and is one of the most dangerous greenhouse gasses, bad for global warming and “globalist” as well. Imagine cow farts are now warming the planet 25 times faster than carbon dioxide.

Poison foods are not so new; this has been a long time coming. “Edible Vaccines” is an article published over two decades ago that speaks on how one can get children to take their medication by injecting it into their snacks like bananas, apples, etc.

In conclusion, the solution is not an easy one, but we must do our homework in knowing where our food is coming from, try growing it, if possible, form communities with small farmers we know and trust, and do our best to expose these evil cults that are trying to wipe us out.

Is decriminalizing drugs the answer to Toronto’s drug toxicity crisis?

Since their initial submission in January 2022, the City of Toronto has spent over a year convening experts, listening to people with lived and living experience of drug use, and hearing personal stories from family, friends, first responders, and frontline harm reduction workers – many of whom have experienced significant loss and grief due to preventable overdose deaths.

The evidence drawn from the different levels of engagement demonstrated to the city that criminalizing the possession of drugs for personal use leads to discrimination and stigma and contributes to people hiding their drug use from their: physicians, friends, family, colleagues, and community. Being criminalized has negative mental and physical health impacts, and a criminal record can prevent access to meaningful employment, secure housing, and full access to the social determinants of health, including fair treatment in healthcare settings.

Due to these findings, there is now support for a made-in-Toronto model of decriminalization.

According to the release titled “Toronto’s Model of Decriminalizing Drugs for Personal Use,” decriminalization is an upstream population health response to the drug toxicity crisis that will be accompanied by a full continuum of downstream mental health, harm reduction, and treatment services. In partnership with community providers, Toronto is taking a data-driven approach to providing critical health services in hotspot areas – places in the city where overdoses are most likely to occur, and where services are needed to save lives.

This model was a collaboration between:

• Dr. Eileen de Villa (Medical Officer of Health)

• Paul Johnson (City Manager)

• Myron Demkiw (Chief of Police)

In the release they note their understanding that policing and justice system resources may be more effective when targeted at preventing the production and trafficking of illicit substances, rather than possession for personal use. After a year of extensive community engagement and partnership building, they recommend the following model, designed to balance the public health and public safety needs of all Torontonians.

As outlined in the initial submission to Health Canada on January 4th, 2022, the goal of decriminalization is to reduce the mental, physical, and social harms associated with criminalizing peo - ple for possessing drugs for their personal use, and it has the potential to meaningfully improve the health and well-being of all Torontonians.

Toronto Public Health is now recommending a Toronto model of decriminalization that includes voluntary referrals to services and creates an exemption to Section 4(1) of the

• Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (i.e., simple possession) for

• All controlled drugs and substances in possession for personal use

• The whole City of Toronto, with specific exclusions; and

• All people in Toronto, including youth

According to the City of Toronto, decriminalizing the possession of drugs for personal use requires a cultural transformation in our thinking: shifting drug use from an issue of criminal behaviour to an opportunity to advance health and human rights. Decades of stigma about drug use has led to an assumption that decriminalization might have a negative impact on community safety. However, possessing drugs for personal use does not directly cause harm to others.

In the release, the present evidence on the impact of decriminalization on drug use patterns. In 2020 systematic review of evaluations of decriminalization and legalization in other jurisdictions found that in the majority of jurisdictions that have implemented decriminalization, or legalization, drug use trends did not change, and drug use did not increase.

Okay, I am going to have to stop this right here… There are some items in this release that need to be highlighted, and readers, we really want your input on this. Remember one thing; YOU run this city. Political parties are here to work for YOUR BEST INTEREST. Is this really the best thing to do, decriminalize drugs?

They say for themselves that studies do show that decriminalization really does not have an effect, so why would we go ahead and implement something that has proven not really to have an effect? What else was discussed at these community outreach sessions? Did they discuss the fact that it could be extremely dangerous giving controlled drugs to youth? How about the fact that what these youth need is mentoring, counselling, not access to drugs. Drugs numb, they do not deal with the core issues, which include violence in the homes, little access to community support.

Then there is another significant point that must be identified; what about all our young African/Caribbean men and women who are in prison right now for drug charges? I am not talking about individuals who were caught with keys of cocaine, no not them. I am talking about the ones caught with a joint, or an amount that was obviously for personal use.

I don’t know community; let us know what you think, and more importantly, let our political heads know what you think. Will this work for our community? If not, what will?