PERSONAL INTRODUCTION
COPPER FARM ECO-VILLAGE (ECO -BALANCE) OSPREY REFUGE PARK (REGIONAL DESIGN) MUNCIE SPONGE PARK (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT) NEW ANTHONY APARTMENT (COMMUNITY DESIGN WITH PLANTING DETAILS) ENGINEERING
OTHER WORKS
CONTENTS
40
37
30
23
10
2
1
Chao Yang
Address
MY SPECIALITIES
WORK EXPERIENCE
Major in Landscape Architecture
1509 N Mann Ave Muncie,Indiana
Contact
cyang4@bsu.edu 765-212-9956
HOBBIES
Qingdao Greenton Architecture Design Company, Limited, Summer and winter in 2012 • Design assistant • Biding document Graduate Assistant of Landscape Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture, Ball State University From August 2014 to May 2015 • Teaching assistant • research assistant, • speaker guest assistant
DESIGN SKILL
LANGUAGE SKILLS
1
2014 INASLA Annual Merit Award COPPER FARM ECO-VILLAGE
FIELD STATION ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER MUNCIE, IN TERM MEMBER: CHAO YANG AND JUE WANG
2
LOCATION
PROJECT DISCRIBING This project aims to construct an eco-balanced environmental education campus, which includes the site planning and design for an FSEEC Land Lab on the Cooper Skinner Field Station property in Muncie Indiana. Our goal is to develop a regional Environmental Education Center for the general public and for Ball State University faculty, researchers and students. All the water, food and energy resources required for the campus are balanced and regenerated on the site. The surplus resources and energy will be exported to produce economic value. The design demonstrates to residents and visitors an ecobalanced lifestyle and cultivates the awareness of self-sustain living.
SITE ANALYSIS Construction Suitability
Drainage Capability
Vegetation
Water
Circulation
3
CONCEPT DIAGRAM
Traditional Building Arragment
Separate for Different Function
Rearrageing building orientation to 15 Degree to meet sun angle and wind direction
4
Change Building Shape to Fair Shaped Form to not Block the Summer Wind for the Building located In the Middle.
CONCEPT SKETCH
PLANING SKETCH
SITE PLAN
Plan rendering by Jue Wang
5
120 SCALE MASTER PLAN
Site design: To satisfy the demands of on-site researching and visiting, we designed two site programs, the campus site and the public site. The campus site mainly focus on faculty and students. The laboratory building and scholar housing units are used for research and living. To provide food, vegetable gardens, orchard and livestock are settled to satisfy residents’ daily needs. For the public site, to show visitors the eco-balanced lifestyle, varieties of demonstration projects are developed. Like green technology public education building, green demonstration house and garden, early childhood learning center, and natural paly area.
6
SYSTEM CONCEPT The design is inspired by plant cell. Our Eco-village equals to a plant cell, each inner system equals to a cell organelle. Each system is well organized, they relate with each other while work independently. The operation of the cell is an excellent manmade model for eco-balanced living. It not only exchanges information in the cell but also communicates with the outside. Through the interexchange and outer-exchange, our site frequently and efficiently producing and growing, from a small plant cell to a mature plant.
NET-ZERO SYSTEM
7
SCHOLAR HOUSE DETAIL PLAN
PASSIVE BUILDING
Plan rendering by Jue Wang
SCHOLAR HOUSE& COMMUNITY GARDEN
SOLAR ENERGY
RAINFALL
WETLAND
ROOF TOP RUN-OFF
SOLAR PANEL
SOLAR HOT WATER STSTEM
I
RAIN GARDEN
ROAD RUN-OFF
Architecture Designed and rendering by Chao Yang
8
BIOSWALE
ROAD RUN-OFF BLACK WATER
STORAGE
WASTE WATER
PARKING LOT RUN-OFF
landscape rendering and diagram by Jue Wang
BIODIGESTOR
WETLAND
SOL AR
P:3 C:5 1,9 54, 5
/y
h w CALCULATION VISUALIZATION E 0k IN ,
50
2 8,
1
TOR IGES
P:
BIOD
W
TU
PRODUCTION SOLAR PARK WIND TURBINE SOLAR PANEL
SOL AR
D
IN
ENERGY SYSTEM
00
PAN P:3 EL C:5 1,921,4 54, 542 40kwh /y kw h /y
RB
74 2 A 4 CH CR IC ES KE N
ARK RP
A SOL
,6
P:11
W
/y
kwh
00 90,0
E
IN
RB
D IN
TU
00
,0
50
2 8,
y
h/
kw
130,042kwh/y 11,690,000kwh/y 18,250,000kwh/y 141,500kwh/y 292,000kwh/y 283,000kwh/y TOTAL: 578,160kwh/y scholar houses 19,200sf 1,121,280kwh/y TOTAL:31,921,440kwh/y
h/y 0kw
ARK RP
A
,00
,690
P:11
2 COW S 2 ACR ES
S HARD ORC ES 5 ACR
WET
WET
C:>
C:>
D
146
LAN
D
146
LAN
,00
0ga
l/y
CR
RO
AD
,00
0ga
l/y
K
ROOF TOP RUN-OFF 34100sf *40.32inch SOLAR DISTILLATION- 142,263gal/y
WATER SYSTEM SURFACE RUN-OFF NON-POTABLE WATER
TOTAL: 554,542kwh/y
TIL DIS
y
al/
S
854,537gal/y 142,263gal/y
TOTAL:996,800gal/y
9,520,000gal/y unknow
TOTAL:>9,520,000gal/y
POTABLE WATER 70gal/day*40 PEOPLE 996,800gal/y TOTAL:996,800gal/y ROOF TOP RUN-OFF 34100sf *40.32inch 854,537gal/y NON-POTABLE WATER SOLAR DISTILLATION142,263gal/y TOTAL:996,800gal/y TOILET FLUSHING 142,263gal/y 10gal/day* 40 PEOPLE 146,000gal/year
0g
,00
LAR
2acres 1acres 2acres ~2acres
POTABLE WATER CONSUMPTION
T
SO
WETLAND PRODUCTION
LO
20
P:14 YSTEM LATION 2 C:14 ,263ga l/ 2,26 3gal/ y y
NG
9,5
P:
TOP
NG
IRRIGATION NON-POTABLE WATER
unknow
SURFACE RUN-OFF WETLAND
TOTAL:>146,000gal/y
CONSUMPTION
y
al/
0g
,00
9,520,000gal/y unknow
TOTAL:>9,520,000gal/y
70gal/day*40 PEOPLE
996,800gal/y
TOTAL:996,800gal/y
10gal/day* 40 PEOPLE unknow
146,000gal/year
T
LO
P
OF TO
RO 37gal/y P: 854,5 C: 854,537al/y
20
7gal/y P: 854,53 C: 854,537al/y
K
ROOF
EE
KI
9,5
P:
R PA
AD
130,042kwh/y 141,500kwh/y 283,000kwh/y
CONSUMPTION MILK 600gal/y *40people 2cows 2acres EGG 32.7lbs/y *40poeple 44chicken MILK 600gal/y *40people 2cows1acres CHICKEN 73.6lbs/y *40people 700chicken 2acres EGG 44chicken VEGETABLE 32.7lbs/y 415lbs/y*40poeple 16,616lbs/y ~2acres CHICKEN 73.6lbs/y *40people 700chicken WATER SYSTEM VEGETABLE PRODUCTION415lbs/y 16,616lbs/y POTABLE WATER
EE
I RK PA
FI
SH
TA GE ES VE CR 2A
CR
356kwh/d 28.3kwh/sf*5000sf
PUBLIC BUILDING
CAMPUS BUILDING 28.3kwh/sf*10,000sf PRODUCTION COW 2 FOOD SYSTEM POULTRY eggs 44 PRODUCTION meat 700 2 COW POULTRY eggs 44 FISH meat 700 VEGETABLEFISH 2acres 2acres ORCHARD VEGETABLE 5acres ORCHARD 5acres
554,542kwh/y
CONSUMPTION
E BL
RO
TOTAL:31,921,440kwh/y
CONSUMPTION PRODUCTION SCHOLAR UNITS SOLAR PARK356kwh/d 0.2kwh*200,000sf WIND TURBINE 500kwh*10 PUBLIC BUILDING 28.3kwh/sf*5000sf SOLAR PANEL public building 5000sf CAMPUS BUILDING 28.3kwh/sf*10,000sf campus building 9900sf CONSUMPTION FOOD SYSTEM SCHOLAR UNITS
SOL
11,690,000kwh/y 18,250,000kwh/y 292,000kwh/y 578,160kwh/y 1,121,280kwh/y
ENERGY SYSTEM
1
P:
0.2kwh*200,000sf 500kwh*10 public building 5000sf campus building 9900sf scholar houses 19,200sf
Diagram Designed by Jue Wang
POTABLE WATER NON-POTABLE WATER
TOILET FLUSHING IRRIGATION
TOTAL:>146,000gal/y
GREEN DEMONSTRATION HOUSE COMBINE WITH AQUACULTURE
9
Osprey Refuge Park MORGAN COUNTY,INDIANA SECOND YEAR GRADUATE STUDIO REREGIONAL PLANNING
10
Endangered Reason Nest in natural and artiďŹ cial structures including at the top of dead trees, hydro poles, duck blinds, microwave towers and navigation light towers.
1950s to 1970s Numbers crashed due to the use of persistent pesticides
Maximum hunting distance is about 12mile of the nest.
1972
Length: 1.5--1.7 m
DDT ban, Ospreys populations rebounded Present Human activities become main factors
Weight: 1.2--2 KG
Live near rivers, estuaries, salt marshes, lakes, reservoirs, and other large bodies of water. Prefer water surrounded by forested habitat.
Highly specialized for eating ďŹ sh about 5-16 inch in size
11
WATERSHED ANALYSIS
Lake Ditch
Site
Lieber State Recreation Area
Snake Creek Mill Creek Site Lieber State Recreation Area Site
Eel watershed
MillCreek Watershed
Lake Ditch Watershed Flow direction
The site is located at the edge of each hierarchy of watershed. It is in the high point of the watersheds. It is the first and second order in this drainage network. Therefore, the water in the site is the resource of higher order stream. What is more important, it does not carry contamination like other higher order stream. The water in site is clear for ospery.
12
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
Millcreek watershed
Lake Ditch watershed
Millcreek watershed
s
ile
6M Site
12 Miles
Lake Ditch watershed
s
ile
6M Site
14%
28%
food resource
food resource threaten
WATER
12 Miles
IMPAIRED WATER
13
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
s
ile
6M
12 Miles
Site
s
ile
6M
12 Miles
Site
44%
53%
AGRICULTURE
FOREST
fertilizer and pesticide contamination
potential habitat
3.8% FOREST FAR AWARY CONTAMINATION
14
Kokomo
SOCIAL FACTORS ANALYSIS
Lafayette
es inut te 90 M ayet
to iles 80 M
SCHOOL HOTSPOT MAP
Munice
Laf
61%
Anderson
po
Indianapolis
Terre Haute
In
to
50
M
ile
s
60
M
ia
na
in ut e d
s
lis
IN ONE HOUR DIRVING DISTANCE 514 schools
Site
20
10
M
M
ile
in
s
Martinsville
ut
to es M
ar
ti
ns
vi
lle
Columbus
Bloomington
15
WATER FLOW ANALYSIS
Legend
16
Watersheds Flowline Site bround Crops
Group B/D soil Group B soil
SOIL TYPE ANALYSIS
Wetland construction potential
Group B/D soil is good for wetland construction. However, the B/D soil is limited on site. So the project will employs group B soil area and add sand in it to make it suitable for wetland construction.
REGIONAL PLAN
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Food
Secondary Entrance
Agriculture Area
Improve water quality to create health aquatic ecoFood system to enhance fish population ▪ Improve water quality to create health aquatic Stabilize riparian condition to prevent soil erosion ecosystem to enhance fish population. Restore aquatic vegetation to reinforce whole food ▪ Stabilize riparian condition to prevent soil erosion. chain▪for osprey aquatic vegetation to reinforce whole Restore Create wetland to clean water food chain for osprey. ▪ Create wetland to clean water. Nest Reduce Nestfragmentation of existing forest and provide Reducearea fragmentation existing forest and more▪potential for osprey toof nest provide more potential area for osprey to nest. Set up buffers around protected lands to intensify Set up buffers around protected lands to intensify edgy▪ condition. edgy condition. osprey nest mixed into forest Establish manmade ▪ Establish manmade osprey nest mixed into forest
Bird Watch
Visitor Center Flooting Wetland
Low Impact Fishing
Riparian Stabilization
Education and Recreation Education and Recreation Maximize education and recreation opportunity ▪ Maximize education and recreation opportunity Provide educational trials and observation tower to ▪ Provide educational trials and observation tower get close to osprey toget close to osprey. Offer▪low impacted fishing such as canoe Offer low impacted fishing suchand as kayak canoe and Buildkayak. education center to provide guide tour about osprey ▪ Build education center to provide guide tour about osprey. Agriculture Area
Scale 1:36,000
17
14.11%
16.81%
74.34%
Water Area
Erosion area
Forest Area
131.68 Acre
(Slope > 33.3%)
677 Acre
147 Acre
▪ Lake of aquatic vegetation to provide fish a place to hide and grow ▪ Constant fetch or wave action caused by boats to case shoreline erosion 18
▪Recreation lawn does not have habitat value for wildlife ▪Agriculture activity aggravate habitat fragmentation and have fertilizer and Pesticide contamination
▪ Biodiversity of upland forest have threaten by human activities.
OSPREY FOOD WEB
19
RIPARIAN STABILIZATION --- LIVE BANK
20
LIVE JOINT PLANTING
LIVE CRIBWALL
Joint planting disguises riprap and may provide habitat. The plant roots help hold soil together under the rocks. It involves tamping live stakes into joints or open spaces between existing rocks or when rock is being placed on the slope face.
A live cribwall is used to rebuild a bank in a nearly vertical setting. It consists of a boxlike interlocking arrangement of untreated log or timber members. The structure is filled with rock at the bottom and soil beginning at the ordinary highwater mark or bankfull level. Layers of live branch cuttings root inside the crib structure and extend into the slope. Once the live cuttings root and become established, vegetation gradually takesover the structural functions of the wood members.
LIVE LOG
LIVE MACHINE
Live log is a cylindrical structure composed of coconut husk fibers bound together with twine woven from coconut fiber. It can function as a breakwater along a calm shallow lakeshore. In addition to reducing wave energy, this product can help contain substrate and encourage development of wetland communities.
Live machine refers to constructed wetland. By restoring wetland along riparian, aquatic vegetation functions as a living machine to clean and buffer water runoff from upstream.
21
Guide Tour
22
Bank fishing
Canoe fishing
Muncie Sponge Park MUNCIE, INDIANA FIRST YEAR GRADUATE STUDIO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
23
LOCATION
Muncie
CONCEPT
SPONGE
Working like sponge, the amount of organic matter in a wetland absorb and storage water when stormwater and wastewater come and release it later. This park has function of peak flow shifting, slowing down runoff, clearing stormwater and wastewater in biological process. The runoff from the design storm fills the shallow depression and is slowly released over 72-hour draw down. It also helps the sanitary facility to clear the wastewater from combined sewer overflow.
Focus on the quality and quantity of stormwater and wastewater
WATER SYSTEM
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
24
WASTERWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
CONCEPT SKETCH Process sketch I
Process sketch II
Process sketch III
MASTER PALN
25
WATER FLOW DIAGRAM
26
CIRCULATION
A. CSO Retaining pond B. Solar Aquatic System T C. Constructed Wastewater Treatment wetland with Low Marsh D. Constructed Wastewater Treatment wetland with High Marsh E. Step Pool (Runoff is diverted into a series of drop boxes flow into step pool) F. Ephemeral Biodeteion drainage G. Perennial Biodeteion drainage for large storm event overflow H. Biodeteion Pond for large storm event overflow to storage water I. Forebay works as a buffer to slow down water J. Stormwater Wetland with low marsh K. Pond L. Stormwater Wetland with High marsh
The bicycle pathway connects the white river cardinal greenway, visitor center and on-site platform, which offers people a convenient access to the site. The on-site pathway is designed to follow water flow direction. As visitors walk along the pathway, they can appreciate the process of stormwater management, which has great education potential.
A: VIEW FROM PLATFORM. A B
C
A: View from platform. Visitors can not only enjoy the wetland view very closely but also touch stormwater by hand. B: View from the bridge. The bridge connects the cardinal green way, observation tower and the visitor center. On the left side is the urban farming area. C: Walk with stormwater. The bridge goes along with the bioswale, which provides a great opportunity for visitors to appreciate the stormwater management process.
B: VIEW FROM BRIDGE.
B: WALK WITH STORMWATER.
27
D: VIEW FORM OBSERVATION TOWER. D
D: View form observation tower. The observation tower provides visitors a perfect perspective of how the design celebrates stormwater and addresses wastewater.
28
E: BIRD VIEW OF CONSTRUCTED WETLAND OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. E
E: Bird View of constructed wetland of the wastewater treatment system. The constructed wetland is a living machine to use vegetation to clear wastewater from solar aquatic system.
29
NEW ANTHONY APARTMENT NEW LIFE STYLE FIRST YEAR GRADUATE STUDIO COMMUNITY DESIGN WITH PLANTING DETAILS)
30
SITE ANALYSIS
LOCATION
MUNCIE
BALL STATE UNIVERSITY
ANTHONY DEVELOPMENT APARTMENT PART
CONCEPT
DESIGN RESPOND Family with Children
Single
Community Center
Couples
Day Care
Respond to Demand
Respond to Site
DESIGN INTRODUCTION
Respond to Form
PROCESS SKETCH
In the new Anthony, to suffice different ages of people’s living style, there are three kinds of living building serving three kinds of people. One is for single students, anther one is for couples, last one with a day-care center near it is for family with children. Furthermore, there is a community center which providing service for peoples’ daily life, such as laundry room, cafes, small market and apartment office. In terms of the organization and form of these building, new Anthony adopts townhouse form with balcony and front door parking. It uses irregular building organization, which breaks from traditional straight way. Those buildings forms a loop around the community center and central plaza. Besides, to respond this loop, a drive way and pedestrian path form another two loop to connect people to different space. Last,there is main road crossing this site which connect people from bethel avenue to this site.
31
SITE PLAN
WB
eth
el A
ve
Out-Compus Community
Three Storeys Apartment
Sport Field
32
SURVEY
Target: on-campus students
A. BBQ Area
1. Couples Building
B. Grass Strip
2. Community center
C.Tree Alle
3.Single students building
D.Sport Area
4. Day-care center
E. Central Sculpture
5. Family building
F.Children's Playground G.Psammophytes Graden H. Plaza for family
33
CIRCULATION A
C A
B
Pathway between apartment building and community center Stone bench and strip vegetation provide an enclosure place for students.
B C
Central plaza Scattering stone around the central sculpture offers students a delighting place to sit and enjoy the Sunday afternoon.
34
Tree Alle The tree alle with small garden under it can provide shade for users to enjoy during the summer time.
PLANTING DESIGN
35
PLANTING SCHEDULE
AERIAL VIEW
36
ENGINEERING
37
755
TW/BW 753
758 20%
757 756
755
20%
TW 756.68 BW 754.5
756
755
756.53 756.83
Flower Garden
TW/BW 760
1.42%
2.8%
756.93
3%
757.16
TW 756.24 BW 753
2.18%
Vegetable Garden
IE out 754.6
Thornless Honeylocust (20" dia.)
3%
2.5%
761
757.16
755
756.86 756.86
764
Stormwater Cistern
757.2
Garden Shed
756
754
762 TW/BW 761 761 760
Mixed Woodland Species 60
20% 757 758 759
756
Paved Sidewalk
757.16 757.39 757.16
755
CB#1 Rim 751.25
20% 6.74% 748
750
TW 757 BW 752.3
LP751.26
752
20%
751
746
750 749
SLP 752
753
750
752 751
Rain Garden
747
TW 756.65 BW 752.1
SHP 744.8
748
745
747 746
TW/BW 752.3
745
TW/BW 748.5
743
Mixed Woodland Species
744
Rain LP742.58 Garden
White Oak (24" dia.)
LP744.28
744 743
7
5
Topo Model Boundary (dotted line, typ.)
74
750
Property Line (typ.)
38
751
750
757
TW 757 BW 752.8
Flower Garden
20%
Daylight 750.8
757.16
757.16
Roof Overhang (typ.)
TW/BW752
SHP 749.3
749
Recreational Lawn
757
20%
CB#2 Rim 751.25
752
3%
3% 3%
Stormwater Cistern
757.16
TW 754.2 BW 749.6 755 IE out 749.6
TW BW 750
753.5 753
Stone Retaining/End Wall
SHP754.4
755.5
IE in Dry well 751.5 754.5
Pipe slopes 5%
Porch & Main Entry
3%
2 2
TW/BW 757
763
3%
757.66
IE in 756.5
756.86 756.86
764.60
Residence FFE 757.66
757.16 756.67
LP755.2
Planting Area
Paved Patio
Pipe slopes 3.6%
SHP 755.4
757.66
752.73
755
Dry well
3%
753
5.4% Rain Garden
3 2
12" dia. Storm Culvert
ad
1 2
2%
754 Pipe slopes 2%
y Ro
Porch
757.66
755
756
756.6 756.48 756.384% 756.26
757.5
Paved Driveway
2.17%
Valle
LP753.8
3%
757.5
754
Rain Garden Rain Garden
756
No curb where apron meets road
3.4% 3%
5.9%
756.45
2%
757.66 2.5%
754.19 3.3%
753.23
SHP754.3
2.18%
5
Curb tapers to 0" (typ.)
754
753
TW/BW 752.7
TW 754.2 BW 750.4 IE in 750.4
757.66 3%
75
Concrete Driveway Apron
TW/BW 753
25% 754
757
755
751
753
756.83 756.67
SHP 755.62
752
Basketball and Guest Parking
752
Stone 752.3 Retaining/Head Wall
N
74
5
742
0
5
10
20
Project number
759
Flower Garden
Stone Path (typ.)
LP750.2
755
Drawn by
754 760
Rain Garden
SLP 752.2
Grading Plan
753
2.5%
Course
754 TW/BW 760
5
Mixed Woodland Species
6" Concrete Curb (typ.)
75
7
Chao Yang July 3rd,2014
Sugar Maple (24" dia.)
60
Course
Mixed Woodland Species
LA 311 03
761
SITE EARTH CUT AND FILL ILLUSTRATION Cut shown in RED
FILL shown in BLUE
39
OTHER WORKS
40
PHOTOGRAPHY
41
HAND DRAWING
42
43