ADA SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN
Intentionally blank to facilitate double-sided printing
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................3 1.1 What is the ADA Transition Plan for the Public Rights of Way? 3 1.2 How does this plan relate to the City’s 1992 ADA Transition Plan.....................................................................3 2.0 Regulatory Framework and Guidance Documents............................................................................4 2.1 The Americans with Disabilities Act ...............................................................................................................................4 2.2 The ADA and its Relationship to Other Laws 4 2.3 Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)....................................................................................4 3.0 Public Participation Overview............................................................................................................5 3.1 Requirements .........................................................................................................................................................................5 3.2 Public Engagement Approach and Documentation.................................................................................................5 4.0 City of Asheville’s Public Rights of Way Self Evaluation Approach and Results ...........................7 4.1 What is a Self Evaluation?..................................................................................................................................................7 4.2 Self Evaluation of Infrastructure in the Public Rights of Way 7 4.2.1 Existing Infrastructure Inventory..............................................................................................................................7 4.2.2 Obstacles Identified 7 4.2.3 Methodology The Corridor Approach...............................................................................................................8 4.2.4 Corridor Evaluation and Results 10 4.3 Self Evaluation of Transportation Policies, Practices and Programs................................................................12 4.3.1 Unified Development Ordinance Findings and Recommendations.........................................................12 4.3.2 Asheville Standards Specifications and Details Manual Findings and Recommendations 12 4.3.3 ADA Public Surveys and Focus Group Findings and Recommendations ...............................................13 4.3.4 Findings and Recommendations from City Department Meetings 16 4.3.5 Findings and Recommendations from External Policy Review and NCDOT Meetings .....................21 5.0 The City of Asheville ADA Transition Plan.......................................................................................22 5.1 Methods for Barrier Removal Infrastructure..........................................................................................................22 5.1.1 Systematic Corridor Approach 22 5.1.2 Planning Level Cost Estimates................................................................................................................................23 5.1.3 Corridor Implementation Schedule......................................................................................................................24 5.1.4 Current Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ADA Transition Plan Elements 26 5.2 Methods for Barrier Removal Policy and Program..............................................................................................28 6.0 ADA Coordinator...............................................................................................................................30
7.0 Request and Grievance Procedure...................................................................................................30 8.0 Moving forward ................................................................................................................................31 8.1 Next Steps..............................................................................................................................................................................31 8.2 Plan Monitoring and Updates 31 Appendix A: Self Evaluation Findings and Corridor Details................................................................33 Appendix B: Project Cost Estimates ......................................................................................................34 Appendix C: Grievance Procedure and ADA Notice .......................................................................36 Appendix D: ADA Standards..................................................................................................................41 Appendix E: Glossary of Terms..............................................................................................................43
/ GAP Plan /// 3
This document is an update and add to the original Transition Plan and addresses access only in the public rights of way and does not include information on the City of Asheville’s programs, practices, or building facilities not related to public rights of way.
ii. Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible;
The requirements for the Transition Plan are dictated by Title II of the ADA (28 CFR 35.150) which requires that a City with more than 50 employees (such as Asheville) must create a Transition Plan to remove the obstacles identified in a self evaluation. Title II of the ADA, 28 CFR 150(d)(3), includes four requirements for a transition plan:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The overall goal of this ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan is to identify barriers in Asheville’s public rights of way and to make a plan to remove barriers so that pedestrians with disabilities can fully access all the amenities the City has to offer. This document is a supplement to Asheville’s 1992 Transition Plan.
The City of Asheville was incorporated in 1797 in the Appalachian Mountains. As the City grew so did its sidewalk and trail network. The terrain in the City is steep in many places and sidewalks were built where they were needed most. Many run alongside roads with steep grades. After the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, in the City began installing curb ramps and fitting them into the existing conditions the best they could. However, much of the City’s infrastructure in the public rights of way (e.g. public streets, sidewalks, road crossings and pedestrian signals, greenways, bus stops, and on street parking) contain barriers for individuals with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on someone’s disability. Title II of the Act requires cities and towns to have a plan to make accommodations for everyone. The purpose of this ADA Transition Plan is to fulfill that requirement for the City’s public rights of way. The public rights of way include all public streets, sidewalks, road crossings and pedestrian signals, greenways, bus stops, and on street parking. This Plan was developed as one of three parts of a larger companion planning effort referred to as Close the GAP, which included development of three plans: (G) Greenway, (A) ADA Transition, and (P) Pedestrian Plans for the City of Asheville.
1.2 How does this plan relate to the City’s 1992 ADA Transition Plan
Many people with disabilities in our city rely on our pedestrian network as their primary, or only, way to travel. According to the 2019 American Community Survey, 12.2% of Asheville's population has some type of disability. Other sources report a greater disability presence. It is the city's responsibility to ensure that people with disabilities can move about city streets and buildings and participate in programs, services and activities without barriers.
1.1 What is the ADA Transition Plan for the Public Rights of Way?
i. Identify physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities;
iv. Indicate the official responsible for implementation of the plan.
The City created a Transition Plan in 1992 in compliance with the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It was based on a self evaluation of the programs and services provided at the time. Transportation is an important program provided by the City and the evaluation covered the public rights of way in a general sense but did not give specifics regarding removal of obstacles.
iii. Specify the schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance with this section and, if the time period of the transition plan is longer than one year, identify steps that will be taken during each year of the transition period; and
The Americans with Disabilities Act, enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. The ADA consists of five titles outlining protections in the following areas:
Title II of the ADA pertains to the programs, activities and services that public entities provide. As a provider of public transportation services and programs, the City of Asheville must comply with this section of the Act as it specifically applies to public service agencies. Title II of the ADA provides that, “…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” (42 USC. Sec. 12132; )
2.1 The Americans with Disabilities Act
/ GAP Plan /// 4
IV. Telecommunications
III. Public accommodations
II. State and local government services
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a Federal law that protects qualified individuals from discrimination based on their disability. The nondiscrimination requirements of the law apply to employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. Title II of the ADA extended this coverage to all state and local government entities, regardless of whether they receive federal funding or not.
V. Miscellaneous Provisions
Title II of the ADA is companion legislation to two previous federal statutes and regulations:
The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 is a Federal law that requires Federal facilities be accessible when they are designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds . The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment.
Even in 2022, the country is without established standards for accessibility in the public rights of way. The United States Access Board is developing new guidelines under the Americans with Disabilities Act, called the PROWAG, that will address access to sidewalks and streets, crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, on street parking, and other components of public rights of way. These guidelines also review shared use paths, which are designed primarily for use by bicyclists and pedestrians for transportation and recreation purposes. These guidelines must be adopted by the Department of Justice and the Department of Transportation to become enforceable standards. As such, the current enforceable standards are the 2010 ADA Standards for building sites and curb ramps. However, FHWA’s webpage on Pedestrians and Accessible Design, June 27, 2017, indicates that the proposed PROWAG represents the current “recommended best practices, and can be considered the state of the practice that could be followed for areas not fully addressed by the present ADA standards”.
2.3 Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
2.2 The ADA and its Relationship to Other Laws
I. Employment
2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
• Multimodal Transportation Commission February 23, 2022
In addition to ADA focus group meetings, the following public involvement activities were completed through the development of this plan.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION OVERVIEW
• CAC Meeting #3 March 31, 2022
(3) A description of any modifications made.”
• Public Survey #2 September 2021
• CAC Drop In Meetings
January 27, 2020
• Initial Public Survey #1 October 30, 2020 January 18, 2021
• September 16, 2021
• Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) #1 January 23, 2020
(1) A list of the interested persons consulted;
3.2 Public Engagement Approach and Documentation
• September 14, 2021
The City of Asheville recognizes that public participation is an important component in the development of this document. Input from the community has been gathered and used to help define priority areas for improvements within the jurisdiction of The City of Asheville.
(2) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
3.0
Attendees included individuals with ambulatory impairments, wheelchair users, those with vision impairments (full and partial) as well as support organizations that provide services for individuals with disabilities. A number of one on one conversations took place as well.
• Public Survey #3 February 14, 2022 March 14, 2022
• Public Meeting #1 August 25 & 27, 2021
Also, as required under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and 28 CFR 35.105, when a self evaluation is completed,
/ GAP Plan /// 5
3.1 Requirements
• March 31, 2022
“(b) A public entity shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations representing individuals with disabilities, to participate in the self evaluation process by submitting comments.
During public input for the Close the GAP companion plan, the city hosted a series of virtual ADA focus group meetings. These small groups allowed for feedback on projects, priority corridors, as well as city policies that impact mobility for differently abled individuals moving about the City of Asheville. The dates of these focus groups were as follows:
(c) A public entity that employs 50 or more persons shall, for at least three years following completion of the self evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection:
• CAC Meeting #2 March 23, 2021
This document was also available for public comment. Additional details regarding the public outreach and comments are included in Section 4.0.
• NC Division of Services for the Blind
• LIFE House Apartments of Asheville
• Asheville Multimodal Transportation Commission (MMTC)
• Hinds Feet Farm
• Bike / Ped Task Force
The City worked with the project’s consultant team and organizations and individuals representing the disability community to generate a dynamic contact list for the project’s ADA Focus Group meetings. For the initial ADA Transition Plan Focus Group meeting in March 2020, a contact form was developed and circulated among participants to identify additional individuals to engage during Plan development.
• Buncombe County Veterans’ Services
• IFB Solutions
• Individuals with disabilities
• Land of Sky
• AARP
• Open Hearts Art Center
• Area Agency on Aging
Throughout ADA Transition Plan development, a concerted effort was made to expand the network with whom the City engaged to discuss ADA challenges and recommendations. The City utilized its Asheville App platform an online tool that allows users to notify the City about issues like water line leaks, potholes, or sidewalk repairs via smartphone or computer to generate a list of email contacts based on submissions containing tags such as “wheelchair”, “ADA”, “disability” and “handicap”.
• Disability Partners
• ABCCM Veterans Restoration Quarters
Orientation and Mobility Specialist NC Services for the Blind
• Asheville Buncombe Institute for Parity Achievement (ABIPA)
The contact list for the ADA Focus Group meetings held on September 14th, 2021, September 16th, 2021 and March 31st, 2022 included 60 individuals representing the following:
• Low Vision Support Group
• National Federation of the Blind
• State Department of Health & Human Services
• Disabled American Veterans
• Family members of individuals with disabilities
• Catalyst Sports (an adaptive sports non profit)
• National Federation of the Blind
• FIRST WNC FIRST Resource Center
• MMTC Transit Committee
• Community Low Vision Center
• Mountain Mobility
• Buncombe County Department of Health & Human Services
/ GAP Plan /// 6
• 42 designated accessible parking spaces
• 187.5 miles of sidewalk
This plan covers the City of Asheville, which contains:
4.2.2 Obstacles Identified
• Sidewalks
As required under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and 28 CFR 35.105, before developing the ADA Transition plan to remove barriers and obstacles, it is necessary to perform an ADA Self Evaluation to identify those items. A Self Evaluation includes a review of current transportation infrastructure conditions as well as transportation policies, practices and programs that impact accessibility. The following sections describe the City of Asheville's Self Evaluation for the Public Rights of Way and in divided into two sections:
• 146 traffic signal push buttons
• Curb ramps
• 677 bus stops (58 with accessible boarding and alighting areas)
• Trails and greenways
4.0 CITY OF ASHEVILLE’S PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY SELF EVALUATION APPROACH AND RESULTS
4.2 Self Evaluation of Infrastructure in the Public Rights of Way
• Infrastructure Self Evaluation
This section of the ADA Self Evaluation examines the condition of the City of Asheville’s Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route (PCR/PAR) and identifies the need for infrastructure improvements. This includes the sidewalks, curb ramps, pedestrian trails, street crossings, traffic control signals, on street parking and transit facilities that are located within the City of Asheville rights of way. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self evaluation and the remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan.
• Traffic signals
• On street parking
4.1 What is a Self Evaluation?
The obstacles identified within these facilities relate to specific dimensions along the Pedestrian Access Routes (PARs) that do not meet ADA standards or the currently recognized “best practices” in the Proposed Public Right of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG).
/ GAP Plan /// 7
4.2.1 Existing Infrastructure Inventory
• 276 traffic signals (34 maintained by the City)
The obstacles identified related to the following facilities within the Public Rights of Ways:
• 3683 existing curb ramps and up to 500 potential missing curb ramps
Examples of minimum standards that must be met for each dimension or element along the pedestrian access route (PAR) are as follows (this list is not all inclusive):
• Bus stops
• Street crossings
• Programs and Practices that Impact Accessibility in the Public Rights of Way
• 9.06 miles of greenways and/or trails
The most common practice for reviewing infrastructure for ADA Transition Plans and Self Evaluations across the United States has involved a detailed identification of pedestrian obstacles by creating a full inventory of every foot of sidewalk, every curb ramp, pedestrian signal, parking space and bus stop. This includes measuring every slope and dimension.
o Curb ramps and crossings
/ GAP Plan /// 8
• Width and length of waiting and loading areas at transit stops
• Horizontal openings (gaps in the surface of travel, such as a gap or hole in the sidewalk)
• Running grades (the slope in the same direction of travel)
• Clear width and height (which is sometimes blocked by encroachments or physical intrusions can include items such as utility poles, traffic signs, street furniture)
• Vertical rises (obstructions that are typically bumps or lips, such as the displacement of a sidewalk panel)
• Detectable Warning Surfaces (DWS) and locations (also known as truncated domes, DWS is a distinctive surface pattern of domes that are detectable by a cane or underfoot to alert people of their approach to street crossings or other intersections)
like most communities, has limited resources and competing demands for them. Because of this, the city worked with industry leaders, with input from FHWA staff, that have been conducting ADA Transition Plans for the Public Rights of Way based on a “corridor approach” that is based on established community priorities and refined through public input.
• Turning and maneuvering space (the space where a pedestrian turns directions of travel)
This endeavor can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and can take multiple years to complete. It creates massive amounts of data that cities struggle to manage and many never use. On top of this, it is common for cities to determine through this process that nearly every facility in the public rights of way will need some sort of compliance upgrade. Frequently, up to 90% of facilities have at least one element of Thenoncompliance.CityofAsheville,
• Parking and accessible route to parking spaces
• Cross slopes (the slopes across the travel path)
4.2.3 Methodology The Corridor Approach
The City of Asheville used a corridor evaluation methodology under the assumption that nearly all of the facilities in the public rights of way contain at least one non compliant element with respect to standards for accessibility in the public rights of way. The methodology evaluates corridors, which are segments of existing segments of streets and greenways in the public rights of way defined by logical project beginning and end point that will scheduled to be upgraded in order of prioritization. Prior to any corridor construction or ADA work, the following systematic process will be completed:
Step 1: Perform a detailed ADA assessment during project scoping which will include identifying barriers and obstacles for repair. ADA elements should be inventoried using a detailed ADA checklist that should be developed in accordance with ADA Standards and PROWAG Guidance. These elements should include the following*:
o Sidewalk cracks and gaps
o Accessible signals and push button placement
o Sidewalk cross slopes
o Vertical and horizontal encroachments in the Pedestrian Access Route (PAR must be kept clear per height and width requirements)
• Traffic signal features (e.g., pedestrian signals and pushbuttons, audible messages and vibro tactile features)
The benefits of this process, as implemented as part of the City’s Close the GAP planning process, are as follows:1.
Step 5: Remove compliant elements from the inventory of barriers.
3. Improves efficiency, as conditions along roadways deteriorate and may be in a different condition by the time any work is done. As such, detailed assessments will be current and not need to be repeated for a project that is programmed for a future year when conditions have changed.
o Crossing features at roundabouts & free flowing right turns
Step 3: Develop a budget and scope of work for updating all non compliant elements for each corridor to remove barriers. The budget and scope of work process should be based on the Pre Design Checklist, as detailed in Chapter 8. Additional priority will be given to any location where an improvement project or alteration was constructed after January 26, 1991, and accessibility features were omitted.
Step 2: Create and inventory of individual barriers and fully ADA compliant elements identified on the corridor. These elements should be documented and maintained on a city database with corridor assessment results and transition plan progress.
Moves toward implementation faster (money and time for up front measurements can be spent on implementation).
Step 4: Complete project planning, design and construction as detailed in Chapter 8 of the Close the GAP companion plan. This work will include an upgrade of non compliant elements to the maximum extent feasible.
4. This methodology develops preliminary corridor budgets based on a worst case scenario (no compliant elements). This allows for funding flexibility in instances where facilities are found to be fully compliant. Excess budget can be shifted to the next set of priorities to continue implementation on an accelerated schedule.
6. Included input from community members with disabilities and considers needed corridor upgrades to remove barriers based on local needs.
o Location specific maintenance and policy needs (what is needed to keep pedestrian access route clear (e.g., future utility work, inadequate repairs, trash cans, vegetation)
2. Allows for cross department and interagency coordination for advanced planning of ADA corridor projects that align with other infrastructure projects. This assists with maximizes the efficiency of implementation and ADA Transition Plan.
*This is not and exhaustive list. All construction must meet the current federal regulations to ensure that corridors are fully accessible.
o Accessible on street parking needs
5. Included a methodical approach to upgrading key pedestrian corridors throughout the city based on a thorough prioritization process. Per ADA 28 CFR 35.150(d)(2) this process considered access to “state and local government offices and facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers” among other key destinations. The prioritization methodology is described in Chapter 4 of the City’s companion planning effort and included a GIS analysis of the following factors: Destinations, Equity, Safety and Public Input.
o Transit stop accessibility
/ GAP Plan /// 9
o Excessive slopes at driveway openings
In order to account for public concerns and reported issues with the pedestrian network, corridors were assigned public input scores based on input received during the initial Broad Community Feedback Surveys in January 2021 and the Project Network Survey in the Fall of 2021, as described in Chapter 3 of the Close the GAP companion plan.
• Funding and project development status
• Prioritization next steps, where applicable
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Roadways
For projects that have a combination of ADA Transition Plan elements (e.g., existing sidewalks and ramps) and Pedestrian Plan elements (e.g., sidewalk gaps and new crossings), the project descriptions were combined. This will allow for development of a complete project as each corridor is advanced into implementation. Even if these improvements are phased (not completed at the same time or under one project), a completed corridor requires implementation of both missing connections as well as upgrading existing facilities in order to ensure accessibility for all users.
Step 1: Corridor Prioritization Round 1 As described in Chapter 4 of the Close the GAP companion plan, this corridor prioritization methodology scored streets in the city to determine the areas of greatest need based on the combination of three scores: destination + equity, safety and connectivity
After the public vetted the priority network, the team compiled project lists and evaluated each corridor to determine needed ADA and pedestrian improvements. From that review, each corridor received a project description and recommendations. The corridor evaluation and project development details are available in table format in Appendix A
o Priority ADA Project Groups 1 5* (See Appendix A)
The database contains the following information:
This plan enables the City to move forward with projects to make all of their pedestrian infrastructure accessible by identifying the areas with the highest needs, the greatest use, and making those improvements in order of priority.
Step 3: Final Project Lists by Category
ADA Priority Corridors were developed as follows:
After the corridor scoring was completed, roadways that scored more than 10 points (maximum score of 20 points) were further divided into two priority* project lists based on roadway maintenance and ownership. These categories were developed to assist with identifying project development, funding partnerships and coordination needs. The results from this analysis are presented in Appendix A.
• Recommended next step for implementation
City of Asheville (COA) Roadways
Step 4. Project Development & Recommendations
o Priority ADA Project Groups 1 9* (See Appendix A).
*All existing pedestrian facilities are included in this ADA Transition plan database as future corridors for barrier removal. Corridors not scheduled for barrier removal in Years 1-15 (Appendix A list) will be prioritized during year 10 through an ADA Transition Plan update, for barrier removal completion in Years 15-40 as noted in Table 2.
/ GAP Plan /// 10
Step 2: Corridor Prioritization Round 2 (Public Feedback)
4.2.4 Corridor Evaluation and Results
The city collected a final round of public input in March 2022 which included an online survey and ADA focus group meetings. Additionally, the Think Tank Team and Citizens Advisory Committee met one final time which involved various city departments, NCDOT and Buncombe County representatives.
5. Amboy Road, from Carrier Park to Meadow Road.
3. Broadway Street (north of I 240), between downtown and WT Weaver Boulevard.
The City can use these ratings as a tool when deciding which corridors to program during regular cycles of capital project programming. For example, when a list of ADA projects is considered for an upcoming capital improvement cycle and one is a high priority corridor with a condition rating of 2 (Good Condition), it may be shifted down on the project list to accommodate a slightly lower priority project with a conditions rating of 5 (Poor Condition).
/ GAP Plan /// 11
Step 5. Public Input Round 3
2. Haywood Road from the French Broad River to Patton Avenue (through West Asheville).
For each corridor, the team completed a desktop scan to identify existing condition information available through published maps, photos, local knowledge and geographic information system (GIS) databases. These reviews included an initial “high level” assessment that indicates the prevalence and severity of accessibility barriers within each Pedestrian Access Route (PAR) including transit stops, parking and signals. This rating database will be updated as corridors are fully assessed during the planning and scoping phase and then updated again as projects are completed and documented as ADA compliant, thus allowing the barriers to be removed from the ADA Transition Plan. The ratings are as follows:
ADA focus group attendees and ADA survey participants mentioned several key corridors in need of ADA upgrades. The top mentioned corridors are as follows (in order of most mentioned):
• Order of magnitude cost estimates
1. Fully compliant.
2. Good condition: needs compliance review to verify.
More on the ADA Conditions Scan
More on ADA Focus Group Feedback and Priorities
As described in Section 3.0, the city hosted a series of virtual ADA focus group meetings. These small groups allowed for feedback on projects, priority corridors, as well as city policies that impact mobility for differently abled individuals moving about the City of Asheville.
Note that no corridors were assigned a rating of 1 (fully compliant) since corridor assessments have not been completed and all corridors remain on the Transition Plan. The rating system was used to determine cost estimates for the ADA Transition Plan steps and implementation schedule
Although a few specific corridors were cited during Focus Group meetings, much of the discussion centered around key maintenance and policy issues that result in obstacles along the Pedestrian Access Routes (PARs) in the city. More details and recommendations on policy and maintenance items are included in Section 4.3.
1. Merrimon Avenue, from downtown to Beaver Lake.
• An ADA conditions scan
3. Fair condition: needs ADA upgrades in spots (specific locations).
4. Tunnel Road, from downtown to the City limits.
5. Poor condition: needs significant ADA upgrades (full sidewalk reconstruction for much of the corridor).
4. Moderate condition: needs many ADA upgrades.
This self evaluation identified what city policies and practices impact accessibility and examined how the City of Asheville implements these policies. Policies and practices are the standards, guidance and steps that the city follows to guide decisions and projects; while often invisible to the public, they are critical to how the public experiences the rights of way. This step identified obstacles or barriers in City of Asheville's policies and practices. The goal is to develop a plan to provide accessibility and allow for full participation of individuals with disabilities.
As part of this self evaluation, the following tasks and reviews were completed:
The ASSDM outlines how to construct facilities in the public rights of way and includes standards for the Pedestrian Access Route (PAR). For example, the ASSDM contains curb ramp, sidewalk and driveway apron details that meet ADA requirements. These policy and design standards are used to determine such factors as:
6. Fairview Road, from Biltmore Village to Swannanoa River Road.
2. Review of the City of Asheville’s Standards Specifications and Details Manual (ASSDM) sections related to accessibility.
4. City department meetings were held to gather and review current policies and practices related to overseeing implementation and maintenance of the public rights of way in the City of Asheville.
1. Review of the City of Asheville’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) sections related to accessibility.
7. Kenilworth Road, spot missing sidewalks and barriers.
The planning team conducted an in depth review of Asheville’s UDO to identify standards that promote, could be changed to improve, or hinder accessibility. The review noted recommended changes to and identified gaps in UDO language. The detailed UDO review and recommendations results are included in Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan. Key UDO recommendations that have the greatest impact on pedestrian accessibility in the city have been included in a set of comprehensive Action Items that are listed in Section 5.2, Table 4.
• Accessibility standards for transit stops and on street parking
4.3 Self-Evaluation of Transportation Policies, Practices and Programs
The following sections summarize the results of this self evaluation and the policies and procedural challenges that impact delivery of fully ADA compliant pedestrian facilities in the public rights of way.
3. ADA related public surveys and focus groups to discuss policies and practices.
• Facility selection: shared or separated facilities (sidewalk, greenway, bike lanes etc.)
The City of Asheville’s UDO is a document that contains regulations that apply to different types of land uses, development, and other regulations. For example, the UDO includes chapters such as Development, Historic Preservation, and Nuisances. In general, the UDO communicates the expectations of the city as it relates to development projects and activities. For example, the UDO requires new sidewalk when someone develops a new multi family residential development with 10 or more units.
4.3.1 Unified Development Ordinance Findings and Recommendations
4.3.2 Asheville Standards Specifications and Details Manual Findings and Recommendations
5. NCDOT meetings were held to gather and review current policies and practices related to overseeing implementation and maintenance of the public rights of way in the City of Asheville.
/ GAP Plan /// 12
• Accessibility standards ADA compliance for ramps, sidewalks, crossings, greenways
• Lighting requirements and standards
• Pedestrian crossing spacing and treatments
• Transit stop amenities
individuals with ambulatory impairments, wheelchair users, those with vision impairments (full and partial) as well as support organizations that provide services for individuals with Duringdisabilities.Focus Group meetings, much of the discussion centered around key maintenance and policy issues that result in obstacles along the Pedestrian Access Routes (PARs) in the city. Group feedback related to types of facilities that are desired as well as key maintenance and policy issues that are summarized on the following two pages. More details and recommendations related to this feedback is included in the following Exhibit 1 and 2.
• Need for facilities on one or both sides of the street
• Temporary traffic control (work zone accommodations for bicycle and pedestrians)
Exhibit 2: ADA Focus Group Priorities for Maintenance and Policy Items (pg 15)
• Trail crossing design (e.g., sight distance, markings and signage)
/ GAP Plan /// 13
• Pedestrian signal standards (including audible pedestrian signal (APS) needs)
The detailed ASSDM review and recommendations results are included in Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan. Key ASSDM recommendations that have the greatest impact on pedestrian accessibility in the city have been included in a set of comprehensive Action Items that are listed in Section 5.2, Table 4.
• Separation (or buffer) from traffic or features such as streams and steep slopes
4.3.3 ADA Public Surveys and Focus Group Findings and Recommendations
During the Close the GAP Plan, the city hosted a series of virtual ADA focus group meetings. These small groups allowed for feedback on projects, priority corridors, as well as city policies that impact mobility for differently abled individuals moving about the City of Asheville. Several one on one conversations took place as Attendeeswell.included
• Facility width
Exhibit 1: ADA Focus Group Priorities for Facilities and Design Items (pg 14)
/ GAP Plan /// 14
/ GAP Plan /// 15
3. Planning and Development Services Departments
The following targeted work sessions were held with various city departments that are responsible for overseeing implementation and maintenance of Greenway, ADA and Pedestrian projects in the City of Asheville. The following 4 focus group meetings were held:
1. Transportation Department
/ GAP Plan /// 16
During the meetings, the planning team covered a series of questions and discussion topics as indicated in Exhibit 3: Targeted Focus Group Session Structure. The summary of findings and recommendations from these meetings is shown in Exhibit 4. Many of the Findings and Recommendations relate to ADA compliance and are included in final ADA Transition Plan methods for barrier removal which are included in Section 5.2, Table 4.
Exhibit 3: Department Meeting Session Structure
4.3.4 Findings and Recommendations from City Department Meetings
4. Capital Projects
2. Public Works and Streets Departments
Need updated ADA design standards and review requirements, including driveways.
Capital PlanningProjectPolicy
Project Selection & Prioritization Needs
Capital PlanningProjectPolicy
DevePolicy/Programlopment
Exhibit 4: Department Meetings Findings and Recommendations
Update city ADA ramp details and relevant design standards to reflect proposed Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG). See detailed recommendations included in the review of Asheville’s Standard Specifications and Details Manual (ASSDM) in Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan.
See recommended project implementation process in Close the GAP Chapter 8.
Recommendation
Targeted Focus Groups: Identified Needs by Category
Funding flexibility for emergency projects and partner matching (grants).
Need for more funding to support project implementation
See recommended project implementation process in Close the GAP Chapter 8.
In order to better address ADA compliance during resurfacing (to include full ADA upgrades that may require right of way), look to plan ahead to integrate and coordinate overlapping ADA transition plan and Capital Projects along planned resurfacing routes.
Challenges with rights of way acquisition that delay sidewalk and greenway projects, and limit ADA compliance. For example, more ADA ramps will be technically infeasible or result in undesirable corner ramps if rights of way is not secured earlier in the process.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Public facing database with city responses to community sidewalk and ADA related requests (Asheville App and other community requests).
Limited resurfacing budgets and scoping result in missed opportunities to include funding for ADA work, complete streets components such as parking spaces, bike lanes.
Project Scoping and ROW Needs
See Close the GAP Chapters 6 and 8 for detailed recommendations related to ADA projects.
Design Standards, UDO and Policy
Capital PlanningProjectPolicy and Funding Investment
Funding Investment
Funding Investment
Update Asheville App (or similar) where records, city responses, and actions taken are visible to the public.
/ GAP Plan /// 17
Consider funding set aside for emergency and grant/partnership opportunities.
Action Type
Project scope and final budget set with insufficient preliminary engineering and there is a need for contingency or flexibility in scope to address unknown budget issues.
Update standard ADA details for bus stops. See ASSDM recommendations table.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Modify development and transportation design and review process to require an ADA checklist and approval by designated ADA specialist. Designs should include detailed elevations with ADA
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Designing for a 2% cross slope often results in non compliant ramps because designing for the maximum does not allow for construction tolerances (variations).
Updates needed on details for transit stop accessibility.
Consider certification process for selected Prcontractors.ovidecontractor resources on city website with typical applications and best practices. Consider implementing/revising enforcement / violation fee structure
Develop a sustainable street light policy and program to address lighting best practices in locations of high pedestrian usage and at pedestrian crossing locations. See example programs in the UDO and
Modify design standards to less than maximum, for example, 1.5% cross slope vs max 2% to allow for construction tolerances (variations).
Update temporary street closure (construction and events) process (see Close the GAP Accompanying Document: Pedestrian Accommodations in Work Zones Design Guidance and Checklist for more Requiredetails).
Developmeasurements.andrequire
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Need for ADA on street parking standards.
technical infeasibility forms (TIFs) for instances where full ADA compliance is not feasible within the scope of work. These forms should be kept on file or uploaded into a GIS database.
Targeted Focus Groups: Identified Needs by Category
Update parking space design and requirements in the ASSDM to reflect proposed PROWAG details.
Recommendation Action Type
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Frequent issues with inadequate access through work zones and temporary sidewalk closures.
a detour design and approval submission for any sidewalk or curb ramp closure and review to ensure detour is in compliance with the MUTCD requirements and proposed PROWAG.
/ GAP Plan /// 18
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Need for lighting requirements / standards for sidewalks, crossings and greenways.
Enforcement for full ADA compliance for impacted facilities during utility repair work.
Develop review capacity and training.
Include flexibility and advanced planning time for greenway alignments through large parcels.
Addressed in UDO and ASSDM recommendations. Enforcement
StaffDevelopmentPolicy/ProgramDevelopment
Evaluate development review staff capacity with respect to ADA Transition Plan recommendations. Develop staff ADA review training program.
Targeted Focus Groups: Identified Needs by Category
OTHER ADA COMPLIANCE CHALLENGES
Action Type
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
With project partners, there is a need for additional ADA knowledge design and construction.
Recommendation
Challenges planning for greenway alignments through undeveloped parcels.
Create rapid response program to enforce clearing of encroachments (trash cans, vegetation, signs, snow removal etc). Permanent obstructions such as utility poles/parking meters are covered in the UDO/ASSDM review in Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
/ GAP Plan /// 19
Consider hiring an ADA review specialist, either internal or contracted.
Continue to work with developments through existing density and parking bonus process for voluntary completion of greenway connections.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
ASSDM recommendations tables (Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan).
Provide regular training.
Provide best practices resources on website.
Consider arrangements to match funds from development greenway easement donations to complete longer stretches of greenway with other grant funding sources.
Addressed in Chapter 5 and UDO and ASSDM recommendations
(PAR) Competingwidthpublic space
Lack of greenway details and specifications.
Maintenance of sufficient Pedestrian Access Route elements, such as trash cans, snow, utilities, trees, parking meters, etc.
Consider ADA certification for contractors selected on city projects. Certification possibilities include design, construction, inspectors, and work zone traffic control.
*Missing curb ramps include locations at intersections where legal unmarked crosswalks exist, including T intersections.
4. Provide best practices resources on website, such as calibration of levels, pre pour elevation checks, concrete finishing.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
2. Coordinate with NCDOT inspection forms for NCDOT streets. Establish a consistent form if possible.
3. Consider ADA certification process and training for contractors selected on city projects.
Targeted Focus Groups: Identified Needs by Category
Consider adopting a maintenance scan and repair process at regular intervals.
1. Complete a City wide ADA parking assessment to ensure that PROWAG requirements for the number of ADA spaces and accessibility elements are provided.
Develop/update meeting location checklists for ADA compliance.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Recommendation
Develop a technical infeasibility form (TIF) and related submission and approval process. Develop a process for citywide tracking / database to maintain an updated list of curb ramps on transition plan. Apply consistently for city, NCDOT and private projects.
2. Include ADA parking requirements during resurfacing projects.
Accessible meetings and special accommodations for public meetings (need policy and process).
Need for official sidewalk maintenance plan document and associated policy.
3. Develop a publicly accessible parking space request policy, program and website.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
/ GAP Plan /// 20
Action Type
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
Inconsistent inspection and enforcement of non compliant or missing* curb ramps.
Ensure all departments are contacting the official ADA coordinator for any ADA complaint or grievance tracking and outcome documentation. See ADA Transition Plan in Appendix C for official grievance procedure.
5. Ensure newly constructed curb ramps and other pedestrian elements are compliant prior to accepting projects and closing out contracts.
Infeasible curb ramps require consistent database to track ADA Transition Plan and document infeasibility.
DevelopmentPolicy/Program
1. Update curb ramp inspection form to include all accessibility requirements (see best practice examples in the ASSDM review in Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan).
Accessible parking requests process/policy.
Complaint process and tracking that is clear and consistent.
4.3.5 Findings and Recommendations from External Policy Review and NCDOT Meetings
2. NCDOT resurfacing policy and budgets include intersection curb ramp upgrades but do not include signal equipment modifications. Ideally, curb ramps and signal push buttons should be updated at the same time to maximize ADA compliance and to allow for better designs (2 ramps per corner) and also allow for audible pedestrian signals (APS). As a result of this practice, when intersection curb ramps are upgraded during resurfacing projects, they may not be located in ADA compliant locations relative to signal equipment and the opportunity to provide much needed push buttons is missed. Another negative outcome may result where ramp configurations are not placed in line with signal equipment (e.g., maintaining corner ramps instead of providing one ramp per crossing with a push button). During joint meetings with city and NCDOT staff, the consensus was that additional funding will need to be pursued as a solution to this issue.
4. During Close the GAP related ADA focus group meetings, public engagement surveys and field observations, it was noted that work zone traffic control on city and NCDOT roadways has not consistently maintained accessible routes, per MUTCD standards, during construction. This is a key finding that is impacting mobility throughout the city and further coordination between NCDOT and the city is needed. See Close the GAP Accompanying Document: Pedestrian Accommodations in Work Zones Design Guidance and Checklist for information on temporary traffic control accessibility guidance.
/ GAP Plan /// 21
1. Current NCDOT policy dictates that street repaving projects must include intersection ramp upgrades where the pedestrian access route is modified during repaving. However, this does not address non compliant Pedestrian Access Routes (PARs) at driveway aprons and mid block sidewalk sections. Although this is standard resurfacing practice in most jurisdictions, the result is a missed opportunity for fully accessible corridors along the most high priority routes in the city (see Chapter 4 for more info on prioritization factors). During NCDOT coordination meetings, participants identified an opportunity to seek additional funding and initiate an early planning and coordination process between the city and NCDOT to combine funding with future resurfacing work to better achieve full corridor compliance. Combining this work is more cost and time efficient than completing this work as separate projects, and offers the best outcome for the traveling public. This process can help to maximize the results achieved with each transportation investment.
The following NCDOT policy and procedural items were identified during the Close the GAP process as having the greatest impact on the city’s ability to achieve an accessible transportation network. These priority items and recommendations will require ongoing coordination between the city and NCDOT:
NCDOT is an important partner in the city’s walkability efforts. There are many NCDOT policies that apply to accessibility in the public rights of way. Similar to the City department meetings, the team met with NCDOT representatives to discuss design standards and policies that impact the implementation and maintenance of Greenways, ADA and Pedestrian facilities within the city.
3. The NCDOT policy for audible pedestrian signal requests and limited funding are an identified barrier to expanding the APS system in the City of Asheville to meet PROWAG compliance, which requires APS to assist pedestrians with visual impairments.
iii. NCDOT projects, often incorporate the improvement of sidewalks, curb ramps, signals, parking and bus stops on projects as identified in their scope.
ii. City capital projects, which have a larger scale, often incorporate the improvement of sidewalks, curb ramps, signals, parking and bus stops on projects as identified in their scope.
i. Street resurfacing is required for regular maintenance and alters the rights of way. Curb ramps are upgraded during resurfacing.
These corridors will also be considered during project planning and programming for resurfacing, capital projects, NCDOT projects, developer activity other maintenance and utility type work. This cross coordination will optimize the delivery of an accessible network.
5.1 Methods for Barrier Removal – Infrastructure
As required under 28 CFR 35.150(d)(3), the City must specify a schedule for taking necessary steps to achieve ADA compliance. An implementation plan and schedule provide a timeline for addressing deficiencies in policies and procedures, augmenting missing or incomplete inventory data, and remediating physical barriers identified through inventory. Section 5.1 below, addresses the infrastructure barrier removal, while Section 5.2 addresses policies and procedures.
Each of the corridors identified in this ADA Transition plan, will be scheduled for ADA detailed inventory and upgrade and will be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as determined by The City of Asheville staff.
/ GAP Plan /// 22
The City of Asheville performs traditional infrastructure management similar to all cities. They are responsible for the condition of the street and sidewalk systems, traffic signals, parking and bus stops. They manage the development and redevelopment throughout the city, utilities in the rights of way and operations occurring under permit. Many of these activities impact the pedestrian infrastructure. These activities will continue and will be a large factor in the removal of pedestrian barriers. These methods are described below:
When a corridor arrives on the annual plan to be addressed, the city’s first task will be to perform a detailed ADA assessment and develop a project scope of work. The following 4 steps will be followed on each project to ensure progress on the plan.
5.0 THE CITY OF ASHEVILLE ADA TRANSITION PLAN
Many of the sidewalks, trails and greenways, curb ramps, street crossings, pedestrian signals, parking and bus stops were installed prior to a standard, or specific expectation of accessibility. Those constructed with the benefit of the ADA Standards and best practice guidance were not always given the scrutiny required to meet the rigorous requirements for access. The City of Asheville is committed to eliminating accessibility barriers for individuals with disabilities within its public rights of way.
5.1.1 Systematic Corridor Approach
iv. Developer activity occurs throughout the City and developers are required to improve pedestrian facilities accessing the development.
v. Utilities and other work done under a permit often result in alterations to the public rights of way and the City will have oversight to ensure that to the extent feasible, the work complies with accessibility requirements.
In order to maximize the results and timeline to upgrade the public rights of way through all the methods described above, a corridor methodology was developed. As detailed Section 4.2 of the Self Evaluation, the City of Asheville has identified specific corridors as priority areas for planned accessibility improvement projects. These areas have been selected due to their proximity destinations (e.g. specific land uses such as schools, government offices and medical facilities), equity factors, safety, connectivity and receipt of public comments.
5.1.2 Planning Level Cost Estimates
o Accessible on street parking needs
o Vertical and horizontal encroachments in the Pedestrian Access Route (PAR must be kept clear per height and width requirements)
o Curb ramps and crossings
o Sidewalk cracks and gaps
*This is not and exhaustive list. All construction must meet the current federal regulations to ensure that corridors are fully accessible.
o Transit stop accessibility
o Location specific maintenance and policy needs (what is needed to keep pedestrian access route clear (e.g., future utility work, inadequate repairs, trash cans, vegetation)
Step 2: Create and inventory of individual barriers and fully ADA compliant elements identified on the corridor. These elements should be documented and maintained on a city database with corridor assessment results and transition plan progress.
Because of the widely assumed non compliance of the pedestrian network, budgets and project scopes will be fluid. As projects are prepared for planning, budgeting and design through the proposed corridor evaluation process, individual elements will be evaluated for ADA compliance. Planned projects, on further evaluation, may be increased or reduced in scope, or the budget may change, to account for more or fewer improvements. Barriers will be removed through alterations and project implementation and compliant elements will be removed from the Transition Plan.
o Excessive slopes at driveway openings
Step 5: Remove compliant elements from the inventory of barriers.
o Sidewalk cross slopes
/ GAP Plan /// 23
Step 4: Complete project planning, design and construction as detailed in Chapter 8 of the Close the GAP companion plan. This work will include an upgrade of non compliant elements to the maximum extent feasible.
Step 1: Perform a detailed ADA assessment during project scoping which will include identifying barriers and obstacles for repair. ADA elements should be inventoried using a detailed ADA checklist that should be developed in accordance with ADA Standards and PROWAG Guidance. These elements should include the following*:
o Crossing features at roundabouts & free flowing right turns
Step 3: Develop a budget and scope of work for updating all non compliant elements for each corridor to remove barriers. The budget and scope of work process should be based on the Pre Design Checklist, as detailed in Chapter 8. Additional priority will be given to any location where an improvement project or alteration was constructed after January 26, 1991, and accessibility features were omitted.
Based on the results of the self evaluation, the estimate costs associated with providing ADA accessibility within the entire jurisdiction for City maintained facilities is $101,274,000*, as detailed in Table 1. This amount signifies a significant investment that The City of Asheville is committed to making in the upcoming years. It is not feasible to immediately remove all barriers to access at one time. As such, an approximate annual cost breakdown will be utilized by the City as a planning tool for determining future annual funding needs and sources. As noted in Table 1 funding and implementation footnotes, sources for future funding will vary and will included a continuation of ongoing capital planning, maintenance and resurfacing programs as well as new corridor projects with a variety of potential funding sources and partnerships. The final order and schedule of implementation will require flexibility in order to accommodate new community
o Accessible signals and push button placement
$2,672,000
Assume Upgrade for 90% of Curb Ramps
$68,244,000
Transit Stops
The City of Asheville has set the following schedule goals for improving the accessibility of its pedestrian facilities within the City of Asheville’s public rights of way:
5.1.3 Corridor Implementation Schedule
Assume 25% (2.3 miles) of Greenway will Require Barrier Removal for ADA Compliance (Intersection ramps included in ADA curb ramp database)
Assume 619 Existing Stops Require 8’x5’ Accessible Boarding and Alighting Areas $832,000
$27,846,000
• 40% Continency Added to Engineering/Survey and Construction Given High Level Planning Costs (10% for Simple Sidewalk and Greenway Replacement / Maintenance Work)
Table 1: Planning Level Cost
AccessibilityEstimatesElement City
Total $101,274,000
/ GAP Plan /// 24
• 30% Added to Construction Costs for Engineering and Survey (Except for Sidewalk and Greenway Replacement / Maintenance Work)
• After 20 years, 50% of accessibility features will be ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible.
(1) Cost Estimate Notes:
• After 10 years, 25% of accessibility features will be ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible.
• After 40 years, 100% of accessibility features will be ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible.
Assume 50% (94 miles) of Sidewalks need Replacement
Signalized Intersections – Push Button and Ped Signals to Accompany Curb Ramp Upgrades
Assume 100% of City Maintained Traffic Signals (20 signals)
Public Rights-of-Way
Greenway Upgrades and ADA Retrofits
• Table 1 does not include costs associated with Pedestrian or Traffic Studies, Right of Way Acquisition or Easements, Curb and Gutter (Beyond Ramps), Retaining Walls, Tree Impact Evaluations, Utility Adjustments, Drainage Design/Improvements, Work Zone Traffic Control (Beyond Typical Applications) or Construction Inspection These items will have significant impact on corridor upgrade cost estimates; therefore, preliminary engineering and estimates should be conducted prior to setting project budgets and limits of work, see Chapter 8 of the Close the GAP companion plan for more information on project scoping.
Estimated Cost (1) (Rounded Up to Nearest $1,000)
Sidewalk Repair
• Costs were developed based on the methodology outlined in Appendix B.
Curb Ramp Upgrades
• After 30 years, 75% of accessibility features will be ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible.
requests or petitions for reasonable modification from person with disabilities as well as new and varying funding opportunities and annual capital programming constraints.
$1,680,000
Table 2: Yearly Implementation Schedule Infrastructure by Corridor
Corridor Projects
/ GAP Plan /// 25
NCDOT Group 1 & 2 Corridors COA Group 1 & 2 Corridors
NCDOT Group 4 Corridors
In addition to these projects, ADA upgrades will be accomplished through the following methods.
COA Group 3 Corridors
NCDOT Group 3 Corridors
NCDOT Group 6, 7 & 8 Corridors
*All existing pedestrian facilities are included in this ADA Transition plan database as future corridors for barrier removal. Corridors not scheduled for barrier removal in Years 1 15 (Appendix A list) will be prioritized during year 10 through an ADA Transition Plan update, for barrier removal completion in Years 15-40.
Years 4 & 5 Years 5 15
Year 10 15 Years 15 40
Prioritize Remaining* Work in City Update ADA Transition Plan
Years 1 & 2 Years 2 10
• Street resurfacing is required for regular maintenance and alters the rights of way. Curb ramps are upgraded during resurfacing.
Years 3 & 4 Years 4 15
COA Group 5 Corridors
Years 8, 9 & 10 Years 10 20
Sources of Supplemental Funding May Include: Future Transportation Grants, Increased Resurfacing Budgets, Additional Budget Line Item Allocations, etc.
COA Group 4 Corridors
InitiatePlanningCorridorandBudgeting
• Grants and Partnerships will be pursued in order to maximize local funding investments.
Years 6 & 7 Years 7 15
• Private development projects are often required to fix existing sidewalks and ramps and will be tracked as well.
• NCDOT projects, ADA upgrades implemented through NCDOT STIP or Resurfacing Projects. These projects often incorporate the improvement of sidewalks, curb ramps, signals, parking and bus stops on projects as identified in their scope.
NCDOT Group 5 Corridors
While the City of Asheville intends to complete the system upgrades as stated, the schedule may fluctuate based on resources. For example, the 2020 Pandemic has had an unforeseen impact on available resources. Similar strains or an inflow of funding may occur in the future.
• Annual Investments for Ongoing City Operations in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) (See Table 3 for most recent CIP): Includes Bond Projects, ADA and Sidewalk Repair Budget Line Items, often 10% of Resurfacing Budgets and 10% of Capital Transportation Projects.
• Utilities and other work done under a permit often result in alterations to the public rights of way and the City will have oversight to ensure that to the extent feasible, the work complies with accessibility requirements.
Completion of BarrierTargetRemoval
• As noted in previous sections, sources for future funding will vary and will included a continuation of ongoing capital planning, maintenance and resurfacing programs as well as new corridor projects with a variety of potential funding sources and partnerships.
Table 3: ADA Related Project Schedule: Current 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
/ GAP Plan /// 26
Annual ADA and Sidewalk Funds (3)
Annual Resurfacing Fund (2)
Annual ADA and Sidewalk Funds (3)
$2,500,000
Pedestrian Plan Project (5)
$3,800,000
Year 2 2024
• Sources of supplemental funding will be necessary and may include federal transportation grants/reimbursement programs. increased resurfacing budgets, ADA budget line item allocations for corridor development, etc.
Nasty Branch Greenway ADA Improvements Greenway Project
5.1.4 Current Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - ADA Transition Plan Elements
Haywood Road: ADA Improvements Roadway Project
Year Project Name & ADA Work Description
• The final order and schedule of implementation will require flexibility in order to accommodate new community requests or petitions for reasonable modification from person with disabilities as well as new and varying funding opportunities (including grant applications) and annual capital programming constraints.
Year 1 2023
Estimated Annual NCDOT Ramp Work (4)
Estimated Value of ADA Upgrades(1) (Rounded Up to $10,000)Nearest
Annual Resurfacing Fund (2)
Greenway Connector Project ADA Improvements Roadway Project
Estimated Annual NCDOT Ramp Work (4)
Vermont Avenue: ADA Improvements Sidewalk Project
Sulfer Springs: ADA Improvements Stormwater Project
Swannanoa Greenway: ADA Improvements Greenway Project Merrimon Avenue (NCDOT Project): ADA Improvements Roadway Project
St. Anne Street Stormwater: ADA Improvements Stormwater Project
Pedestrian Plan Project (5)
Table 3, below, shows a projection of the planned ADA Transition Plan related barrier removal projects that have already be scheduled for the next 5 years, per the City’s most recently approved Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). With the adoption of this ADA Transition Plan, CIP modifications in future years are necessary to align the CIP with the findings of this ADA Transition Plan.
Coxe Avenue ADA ADA Improvements Roadway Project
$1,200,000
Annual Resurfacing Fund (2)
Annual Resurfacing Fund (2)
Livingston Complete Street ADA Improvements Roadway Project
Annual ADA and Sidewalk Funds (3)
(5) Pedestrian Plan Project is allocated funds for projects that will be identified from the GAP prioritization lists.
Pedestrian School Zone Safety
/ GAP Plan /// 27
$837,000
Estimated Annual NCDOT Ramp Work (4)
(1) Estimated cost of ADA upgrades to remove barriers on existing pedestrian facilities within the Public Right of Way
Year 3 2025
Nasty Branch Greenway ADA Improvements Greenway Project
Pedestrian Plan Project (5)
Annual ADA and Sidewalk Funds (3)
Annual ADA and Sidewalk Funds (3)
Deaverview Sidewalks ADA Improvements Sidewalk Project
Pedestrian Plan Project (5)
Estimated Annual NCDOT Ramp Work (4)
(2) Annual Resurfacing Funds include ADA upgrades averaging 10% of project costs.
$1,550,000
Year 5 2027
Pedestrian Plan Project (5)
(3) NCDOT Resurfacing Funds include ADA upgrades, average of 10 ADA ramp upgrades per year.
Coxe Avenue ADA Improvements Roadway Project
(4) Annual Sidewalk Fund: Includes some barrier removal, estimated at 10% of Sidewalk Funds.
Estimated Annual NCDOT Ramp Work (4)
Year 4 2026
Annual Resurfacing Fund (2)
Greenway Connector Project ADA Improvements Greenway Project
• Designers, reviewers, field inspectors, consultants and contractors
Year 1 5
7 Develop checklist for accessible meetings and special accommodations for public meetings (need policy and process). Include internal process and funding for sign language interpreters and other accommodations request.
/ GAP Plan /// 28
• Technical Infeasibility Form training
2 Update Asheville App (or similar) where records, city responses, and actions taken are visible to the public. Year 1
The following table indicates the following methods and schedule for removing existing barriers in policy and programs related to the public rights of way and to ensure that future pedestrian facilities are compliant to the maximum extent feasible.
Method ID # Details
Year 1 5
5 Develop a GIS process for tracking ADA Transition plan and documenting ramp compliance for corridor work, including design checklist, inspection form and Technically Infeasible Forms (TIFs)
14 Keep it Clear Sidewalk Policy and Campaign: Create rapid response program and campaign to enforce clearing of encroachments (trash cans, vegetation, signs, snow removal etc).
Year 1
13 Develop, adopt and require Technically Infeasible Forms for ADA Design and Inspection. Year 1
Year 1 5
9 Develop a publicly accessible parking space request policy, program and website. Year 1
10 In order to better address ADA compliance during resurfacing (to include full ADA upgrades that may require right of way), develop a process for advanced project planning to integrate and coordinate overlapping ADA transition plan and Capital Projects along planned resurfacing routes.
1 Develop ADA Design Checklist and Submission Requirements.
Year 1 5
Year 1
4 Update the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). See Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan for detailed update needs.
Year 1
3 Update the Asheville Standards Specifications and Details Manual (ASSDM). See Appendix 12 of the Close the GAP companion plan for detailed update needs.
8 Develop interdepartmental “ADA grievance” and request database
15 Implement Work Zone Traffic Control guidance per the Close the GAP Accompanying Document: Pedestrian Accommodations in Work Zones Design Guidance and Checklist
(TargetScheduleDate)
5.2 Methods for Barrier Removal - Policy and Program
• Work Zone Traffic Control for designers, reviewers and field inspectors
6 Develop official sidewalk maintenance plan document and associated policy. Develop a schedule for a maintenance scan and repair process at regular intervals
Table 4: Implementation Schedule – Policy and Program
Year 1 5
Year 1
12 Develop ADA Training Programs and Requirements for:
Section 4.3 of the Self Evaluation included a review and recommendation of programs and policies that impact accessibility within the City’s public rights of way
Year 1
Year 1
11 Develop systematic rights of way process to maximize ability to achieve ADA compliance. Year 1 5
18 Update City policy on closing curb ramps to reflect the FHWA Guidance See Appendix D for more information Year 1
24 Advocate with NCDOT to expand requirements for provision of an accessible PAR through construction zones on NCDOT roads. Ongoing
16 Explore Franchise Agreement with utility companies to address work that impacts accessibility within the public rights of way
Advocate with NCDOT leadership to modify policies for installation of audible pedestrian signals (APS) in order to comply with PROWAG. Ongoing
21 Collaborate with NCDOT on advanced planning for future resurfacing projects to seek additional funding to achieve full PAR upgrades and compliance on high priority corridors.
Year 1 5
/ GAP Plan /// 29
Year 1 5
Ongoing
17 Seek matching funding for NCDOT resurfacing projects in order to upgrade entire Pedestrian Access Route (PAR) vs intersection curb ramps.
19 Continue meetings with the Close the GAP ADA Focus Group and form an official Advisory Committee to provide guidance on the ADA Transition Plan implementation, input on priorities such as APS locations and can weigh in on technically infeasible ramp designs, and transportation project reviews across the city.
Year 1
23
Ongoing
20 Update Inventory of On Street ADA Parking spaces to match PROWAG which calls for 1 accessible space for every 25 marked or metered spaces on a block perimeter (for first 100 spaces) and if more than 100 spaces are provided, an additional 1 accessible space for every 50 additional marked or metered spaces (in excess of the first 100) on a block perimeter.
Ongoing
22 Advocate with NCDOT leadership to include signal equipment modification during ramp upgrades to provide push buttons and ensure compliant ramps and push button placement.
Email: bstein@ashevillenc.gov
Bradley J. Stein, MPA, CPCU, ARM, AIC City of Asheville Risk Manager / ADA Coordinator P.O. Box Asheville,7148NC 28802
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, each agency is required to publish its responsibilities in regard to the ADA. This public notice is provided in Appendix C. If users of The City of Asheville programs, facilities and services believe the City of Asheville has not provided reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance.
The City of Asheville has also incorporated a software application by the name of The Asheville App (add link) into their Customer Service and request operations. The purpose of the app is to provide citizens a convenient way to notify the City of concerns, requests and informal complaints so they may be addressed without the need to file a formal grievance. When a concern is received, it is routed to the appropriate City department for a response.
/ GAP Plan /// 30
In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(a), the City of Asheville has identified an ADA Title II Coordinator to oversee the City of Asheville policies and procedures. Contact information for this individual is as follows:
6.0 ADA COORDINATOR
Office Phone: 828 259 5687
Mobile Phone: 828 552 1179
7.0 REQUEST AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City of Asheville has developed a grievance procedure for the purpose of the prompt and equitable resolution of citizens’ complaints, concerns, comments, and other grievances. This grievance procedure is outlined in Appendix C.
3. Plan updates:
The City also intends to adopt the 2011 Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Rights of Way (PROWAG) to enable City enforcement of these guidelines throughout the design and construction process of pedestrian facilities s in the public rights of way.
• The City recognizes the importance of public input as the priority corridor schedule evolves. With each update, a public comment period will be established to continue the public outreach
The annual report will be produced and presented to the City Council and made available to the public each March.
1. Tracking system:
• The implementation section of this document will be updated every 5 years
8.1 Next Steps
Moving forward, the City will also monitor progress as described in the tasks and schedule below:
8.2 Plan Monitoring and Updates
2. Annual reporting:
The City will begin internal coordination to address the programmatic barriers identified in the Transition Plan. The City will develop an implementation plan for the next 40 fiscal years. Projects identified in the ADA Transition Plan will be programmed within the 40 year budget based on the prioritization provided (See Table 1 and 2) and other factors determined by the City, such as how barrier removal can be incorporated into future City projects identified for capital improvements.
The City of Asheville will document the removal of barriers from its transportation system and maintain a database of such information. As progress is made removing barriers in priority areas and around the community the City will be able to document improvements and identify areas in need of improvement. As the Transition Plan is implemented, compliant corridors and individual compliant elements will be removed from the expected Transition Plan improvements. At the end of each year, the City will complete a program review and an annual update report summarizing completed actions and describing any changed in conditions. The report enables tracking of progress in removing accessibility barriers and achieving ADA compliance.
This document will continue to be updated as conditions within the City of Asheville evolve.
/ GAP Plan /// 31
Given the number of barriers across the City, the associated cost for improvements, and available funding mechanisms, full compliance is anticipated to be achieved over a period of 40 years. For each year of implementation, the City will develop a plan outlining specific actions to be completed during the year based on this implementation plan.
8.0 MOVING FORWARD
• The remaining body of the document will be updated on an as needed basis.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: SELF-EVALUATION FINDINGS AND CORRIDOR DETAILS
*Note: Based on the Corridor Approach, no corridors were deemed fully compliant as full detailed ADA assessments have not been conducted as part of this process. For more on the Corridor Approach and when this assessment will be completed, see Chapter 6 of the report.
Design, Right-of-Way, Construction: Next step for funded projects.
1. Map ID 2. Road Name 3. Segment 4. Current
8. ADA Condition Scan: Results of a desktop scan of existing sidewalks along the corridor to assess ADA compliance of existing sidewalks.
Noted as funded as a City of Asheville bond project, a City or NCDOT Resurfacing project, or a funded NCDOT project (which may also include City matching funds) Partial Funding: Overlapping funded project (noted) does not cover all of the corridor needs.
6. Project Description: Initial description based on preliminary project needs assessment or, if funded, the associated project scope and description.
5. Next Step for Project Implementation
Fund Planning*: Additional planning is required to better define the scope of corridor recommendations to address overlapping land use and transportation needs.
Fund Feasibility Study: Due to observed corridor constraints, additional feasibility analysis is needed to refine the project limits and details.
APPENDIX 10: ADA PROJECT LISTS
Study Complete: A corridor study* has been completed with recommendations to move forward into further study and/or project development.
Fund Preliminary Engineering: These projects will require preliminary engineering (30% design) to further evaluate right of way needs, constraints and cost.
7. Project Pedestrian/ADA Needs: Initial assessment to identify needs related to sidewalk gaps, existing sidewalk conditions (including ADA non compliance) and pedestrian crossings.
1 – ADA Compliant*: Remove from ADA Transition Plan 2 – Good Condition: Needs Compliance Review 3 – Fair Condition: Needs ADA Upgrades in Spots (Specific Locations) 4 – Moderate Condition: Needs Many ADA Upgrades 5 – Poor Condition: Needs Significant ADA Upgrades (Full Sidewalk Reconstruction for Much of the Corridor)
Table Column Descriptions Funding Status Not Funded:Funded
Submit for Prioritization: The next step for unfunded but planned MTP projects is prioritization through the FBRMPO and NCDOT’s SPOT process.
Planned (MTP): This project has been identified in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)
Lake Julian Beaver Lake AVLAirportRegional BiltmoreEstate BiltmoreForest Fletcher Mills River Woodfin 9.A 8.C 8.G 9.M 6.B 5.C 9.D 3.E 4.G 5.A 9.F 2.C 4.A 3.B 9.E 6.C 9.L 5.H 9.G 4.E 9.B 5.I 9.I 9.C 8.F 6.D 9.H 7.A 8.D 5.B 7.B 4.I 8.B 3.C 6.F 5.D 4.H 3.A 5.G 5.F 4.C 2.B 4.F 8.A 6.E 5.E 9.K 2.D 3.G 8.E 9.J 4.B 2.A 4.J 2.E 4.D 3.F 1.A 6.A 3.D 26 40 26 40 40 240 240 NCDOT:ADA PROJECTS Groups 1 and 2 Groups 3 and 4 Groups 5 and 6 Groups 7 and 8 Group Downtown9 Asheville City of Asheville Area Cities 1 Mile NORTH 5.C 8.G 2.A9.M 9.D 4.B 9.F 9.E BiltmoreForest 240 6.E 2.D 8.C 4.B 6.B 3.E 4.G 5.A 2.C 4.A 9.L 2.A 7.B 7.A 4.C 0.5 Miles DOWNTOWN ASHEVILLE
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
Access Management Project to include Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Including Crossings and Possible Multiuse Sidepath)
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Needs Significant
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
ADA Condition DescriptionScan
2.D Merrimon Ave (US 25) I-240 to WT Weaver Blvd 18 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Road Diet with Complete Streets Elements
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
ADA Upgrades; Improved Crossings and Conversion to Greenway 2 Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review
2 Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review
2.E Patton Ave (US 19/23; Alt US 74)
ConditionADARating(1-5)
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
3.C Tunnel Rd I-240 Interchange 17 Study Complete
Sidewalk on West Side between Swannanoa River Rd and First Signal at Shopping Center. Investigate Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Needs at Old Charlotte Highway
3.D RdHendersonville(US25)
Widen Sidewalks (or Sidepath) &/or Buffer from Traffic; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 5
Study recommends a sidepath (south side) from the Tunnel to I-240; includes roadway and intersection improvements. Widen sidewalk through the interchange to create a multiuse sidepath.
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
Johnston Blvd/ Haywood Rd to I-240 Interchange 18 Bond Funded (Partial for Sidewalk Gaps)
3.G Patton Ave (US 19/23; Alt US 74) Old Haywood Rd to Johnston Blvd/ Haywood Rd 17 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Access Management Project to Include Bike/Ped in the MTP (Not Funded) Complete
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
2.C Merrimon Ave (US 25) I-240 Interchange 18 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Road Diet with Complete Streets Elements
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Sidewalk Condition –ADA Upgrades Condition Needs Many ADA Upgrades
Connection to Future Greenway; Residential Housing; Retail and Transit 2 Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review
3 Fair
3.A Tunnel Rd Chunns Cove to S. Tunnel Rd 17 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
2.A Biltmore Ave Southside Ave to Thompson St 18 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
5 Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
5
5
IDMap# Road Name Segment ScoreTotal Funding Status Next Step
2.B Fairview Rd (Alt US 74) Swannanoa River Rd to School Rd 18 Fund Planning
3.E Charlotte St I-240 Interchange Planned (MTP) Fund Short Term Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
3.B Tunnel Rd Tunnel Rd to Chunns Cove Rd Grouped Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
ADA GreenwayOverlappingReviewCompliance-SeeProject
Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 5 Poor
Study recommends a sidepath (south side) from the Tunnel to I-240; includes roadway and intersection improvements. Widen sidewalk through the interchange to create a multiuse sidepath.
3
5
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
3.F Smokey Park Hwy (US 19/23; Alt US 74) Sand Hill Rd to Old Haywood Rd 17 Fund Planning
5
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
ADA Upgrades Submit Prioritizationfor MTP Proposed Modern Roundabout Interchange. Recommend Short Term ADA Signal Upgrades Due to Recent Crashes Pedestrian Signals and Corridor ADA Upgrades 4
Study recommends a sidepath (south side) from the Tunnel to I-240; includes roadway and intersection improvements. Widen sidewalk through the interchange to create a multiuse sidepath.
17
Project Description
17
4.A Biltmore Ave (US 25) Patton Ave to Hilliard Ave 16 ADA ReviewCompliance Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and UpgradesPossible Road Diet for Reduced Pedestrian Exposure ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 4.B McDowell St (US 25) Entire Street 16 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng Study Recommended the Following Under Biltmore and McDowell Greenway Connector Option B: Remove a travel lane on McDowell Street to provide a sidepath on one side of the street. Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate
Pedestrian/ADA Needs
Right of Way for Bond Bond Match; 80% LAPP Funded
Rock Hill Rd to NC 280 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng See Hendersonville Road Study
1.A Tunnel Rd New Haw Creek Rd to Porters Cove Rd 19 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor
–
Study recommends Biltmore and McDowell Greenway Connector Option A: Remove a travel lane on Biltmore Ave for a sidepath or separated bicycle facility between Southside and Caledonia Road.
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
5.B S Tunnel Rd Entire St 15 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
– Needs Spot
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Submit Prioritizationfor
Fund Planning
To Include Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Including Crossings and Possible Multiuse Sidepath)
Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalk (or Sidepath); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
4.C S. Charlotte St I-240 to Biltmore Ave 16
16
5.C RdHendersonville(US25) Biltmore Ave to I-40 15
4.F Merrimon Ave (US 25) WT Weaver Blvd to Beaverdam Rd Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Road Diet with Complete Streets Elements
4.D RdHendersonville(US25) I-40 to Rock Hill Rd 16 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor
3
3
Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalk (or Sidepath); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Management Project in MTP to Include Pedestrian (Including Crossings and Possible Sidepath)
Improved & More Frequent Crossings (Consider Potential for Road Diet to Address Overlapping Bicycle Needs) 2
16
Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalk; Ramp Crossing Treatments and ADA Upgrades; Consider Widening East Side for Sidepath for Overlapping Bicycle Needs 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalk; Ramp Crossing Treatments and ADA Upgrades; Consider Widening for Sidepath for Overlapping Bicycle Needs
IDMap# Road Name Segment ScoreTotal Funding Status Next Step Project Description Pedestrian/ADA Needs ConditionADARating(1-5) ADA Condition DescriptionScan
Facilities
16
Planning Needed to Integrate Planned Projects for Adjoining Road Sections to the North and South
Pedestrian Signals and Corridor ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
– Needs Spot
Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
5.E Long Shoals Rd (NC 146) Schenck Parkway to Overlook Dr 15 Fund Planning
4.I Haywood Rd I-240 to Sand Hill Rd 16 Funded (NCDOT# HL-0003) Construction 2022 Resurfacing+ Project (ADA Upgrades) Pedestrian Signals and Corridor ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalk; Ramp Crossing Treatments and ADA Upgrades; Consider Widening for Sidepath for Overlapping Bicycle Needs 3
Study recommends parallel greenway along the west side of I-240 connecting to Tunnel Road near southern mall access. Connects to Swannanoa River Road as a sidepath along the east side.
Multiuse
Widen Sidewalk Where Feasible 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
Planning Needed to Evaluate Pedestrian Accomodations Plan
Bicycle and
Fund Planning
5.A Broadway St Patton Ave to I-240 15
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 5 Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
Access Management Project
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
Pedestrian Signals and Corridor ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
4.G Broadway St I-240 Interchange Planned (MTP)
5.G Airport Rd (NC 280) Town of BoundaryFletcher 15 Planned (MTP) Fund Preliminary Eng Access Management Project To Include Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Including Crossings and Possible Multiuse Sidepath) Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair
Planning Needed to Evaluate Pedestrian Accomodations Plan
5.F Airport Rd (NC 280) Watson Rd Hendersonvilleto Rd 15 Bond Funded for North Side; Planned (MTP) for Remaining North Side PrioritizationSubmitConstruction;-for for Remaining Planned Access
5.D Long Shoals Rd (NC 146) Hendersonville Rd to Overlook Dr 15 Fund Planning
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades Fair Condition ADA Upgrades Condition ADA Upgrades Condition ADA Upgrades
5
– Needs Spot
Fund Planning
4.H Haywood Rd Sand Hill Rd to Patton Ave Funded (NCDOT# HL-0003) Construction 2022 Resurfacing+ Project (ADA Upgrades)
4.J Sweeten Creek Rd (Alt US 25) Crayton Rd to Rock Hill Rd 16 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Access Management Project To Include Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Including Crossings and Possible Multiuse Sidepath)
5.H Broadway St WT Weaver Blvd to I-26 Interchange 15 Partially Funded (NCDOT# BL-0005) Fund Preliminary Eng for I-26)for(ConstructionRemainder2022Sectionunder Partially Funded - NCDOT pedestrian improvements from US 19/23 northbound exit ramp to north of SR 1477 (Riverside Drive). Needs sidewalk and crossings for remainder of limits. Complete Sidewalk One Side (Consider Sidepath for Overlapping Planned Greenway Connection); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair
Planning Needed to Evaluate Pedestrian Accomodations Plan
4.E RdHendersonville(US25) I-40 Interchange 16
ADA ReviewCompliance
Beverly Rd West to I-240 Funded (NCDOT# HL-0003) Construction 2022 Resurfacing+ Project (ADA Upgrades) Pedestrian Signals and Corridor ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades
ADA Upgrades; Improved & More Frequent Crossings (Consider Potential for Road Diet to Address Overlapping Bicycle Needs)
8.B Sardis Rd (NC 112) Country Meadows Dr to Sand Hill Rd 12 Funded (NCDOT# U-6047)
Fund Planning
14
Detailed ADA and Crossings and Upgrades Upgrades and Improved Crossings Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
6.F Haywood Rd Beverly Rd West to Roberts St/Clingman Ave Traffic Cir 14
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Two Sides with Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) One Side with Transit Stops Connections; Improved Condition Many Sidewalk Moderate Condition Needs Many ADA Upgrades Condition ADA Upgrades Condition Upgrades
15
ADA ReviewCompliance
7.A Clingman Ave Entire St 13 ADA ReviewCompliance
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 5
ADA
6.B Biltmore Ave (US 25) Southside Ave to Hilliard Ave 14
ROW Construction2025/ 2028
Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Both Sides with Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades. Consider Multiuse Sidepath to Connect Planned Greenways. 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Improved
Confirm Needs with Neighborhoods and Evaluate Future Uses along N. Bear Creek Road
Both Sides with Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades. 4
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
& More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3
8.C Montford Ave I-240 Interchange and Crossings Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
–
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (Consider Sidepath for Overlapping Planned Greenway Connection) & Widen &/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
6.A Brevard Rd (NC 191) I-240 to Stradley Mtn Rd/Ridgefield Blvd
8.D Louisiana Ave Haywood Rd to Patton Ave 12 ADA ReviewCompliance
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
8.E Sand Hill Rd Wendover Rd to Haywood Rd 12 Fund Planning
8.A Brevard Rd (NC 191) I-240 to Haywood Rd 12 Fund Planning
9.B N. Louisiana Ave Patton Ave to north of Hazel Mill Rd 11 Funded (NCDOT# U-6162) ROW 2025 Roadway modernization project to include completion of sidewalks both sides and bicycle lanes. Complete Sidewalk Gaps Both Sides with Transit Stops Connections; ADA and Crossing Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition –Needs Many ADA Upgrades 9.C Wood Ave Swannanoa River Rd to Future St 11 ADA ReviewCompliance Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair
ADA Upgrades 8.F Mills Gap Rd Hendersonville Rd to Alpine Ridge Dr 12 Funded (NCDOT# U-5834) ROW Construction2022/ 2024 Roadway Modernization Project from US 25 to Weston Road. Project to Include Complete Sidewalk Both Sides and Bike Lanes. Complete
Merrimon Ave (US 25) Beaverdam Rd to Wembley Rd 14 Planned (MTP) Submit Prioritizationfor Road Diet with Complete Streets Elements
IDMap# Road Name Segment ScoreTotal Funding Status Next Step Project Description Pedestrian/ADA Needs ConditionADARating(1-5) ADA Condition DescriptionScan
3
5.I Haywood Rd
6.C New Haw Creek Rd Arco Rd to Beverly Rd 14
3
7.B College St & Tunnel Rd Charlotte St BeaucatchertoTunnel 13 Fund Planning
8.G Swannanoa River Rd One Way to Bryson St 12 ADA ReviewCompliance Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 9.A Amboy Rd Bridge French Broad River Bridge 11 Funded (NCDOT# U-4739) ROW Construction2025/ 2030 Roadway Modernization with Complete Streets (and Possible Multiuse Sidepath) Needs Sidewalk Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Crossings. 5 Poor
– Needs Spot ADA
12 ADA ReviewCompliance Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Two Sides with Transit Stops Enhancements; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Review
Submit Prioritizationfor
6.E Broadway St I-240 to WT Weaver Blvd 14 Planned (MTP)
Roadway Modernization Project from US 19/23 to Brevard Road (NC 191). Project to Include Complete Sidewalk Both Sides and Bike Lanes.
6.D
– Needs Significant
3
ADA ReviewCompliance
Planed modernization project to include a road diet and pedestrian upgrades from Chestnut Street to I-240.
Complete Sidewalk Gaps Both Sides; Improved Crossings; ADA Upgrades; Consider Connections to Planned Tunnel Road Sidepath (to the East) 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Planning Needed to Evaluate Pedestrian Accomodations Plan
Land
–Needs
ScoreTotal
ConditionADARating(1-5)
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.L Southside Ave (US 25) Entire St 11
Complete Sidewalk Gaps Both Sides with Transit Stops Connections; ADA and Crossing Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.G Overlook Dr NC 146 to Springside Rd 11 ADA ReviewCompliance
Roadway Modernization with Complete Streets (and Possible Multiuse Sidepath)
IDMap# Name Segment Funding Status Next Step Project Description
9.K Sand Hill Rd (NC 112) Lake Dr to Sardis Rd 11 ADA ReviewCompliance
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings
9.F Biltmore Ave Thompson St HendersonvilletoRd US 25 11 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
9.D All CrescentSouls (US 25) McDowell St Hendersonvilleto Rd 11 Study Complete Fund Preliminary Eng
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades (Consider Overlapping Biltmore/McDowell Corridor Study Recommendations) Including a Sidepath between Biltmore Ave and McDowell St.
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.H Rosscraggon Rd and Rathfarnham Rd Entire St 11
Road
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Needs Sidewalk Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Crossings.
Complete Sidewalk Gaps (Both Sides) ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.M Bryson St (US 81) Biltmore Ave to Swannanoa River Rd 11 Funded U-6046/5832)(NCDOT# ROW 2029
Roadway widening and modernization project. Includes complete streets elements (sidewalks/bike lanes and/ or greenway). Project to be coordinated with Swannanoa River Greenway.
9.E Brooke & Lodge St Entire Street 11 Study Complete ADA ReviewCompliance
Study Recommends Widening the Sidewalk on the West Side for a Sidepath to Connect to Swannanoa River Greenway to the North and Biltmore Village Sidepath to the South.
ADA Condition DescriptionScan
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath) and Widen and/or Buffer Sidewalks; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.I Beaverdam Rd Merrimon Ave to Kimberly Ave 11 ADA ReviewCompliance
ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Pedestrian/ADA Needs
3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
9.J Amboy Rd Entire St 11 Funded (NCDOT# U-4739) ROW Construction2025/ 2029
Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades (Consider Overlapping Biltmore/McDowell Corridor Study Recommendations) Including a Sidepath between Biltmore Ave and McDowell St.
Fund Preliminary Eng Needs Sidewalk One Sides (or Sidepath) and Crossings. Needs Sidewalk One Sides (or Sidepath) and Crossings.
Fund Preliminary Eng & ComplianceADA Review A. Spot Sidewalks B. Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades
5.T 4.F 5.J 4.I 3.D 4.G 5.O 5.K 5.M 5.L 5.A 5.S 4.E 5.R 5.Q 3.A 5.N 4.H 5.P 4.J 4.K Lake Julian Beaver Lake AVLAirportRegional BiltmoreEstate BiltmoreForest Fletcher Mills River Woodfin 26 40 26 40 40 240 240 COA:ADA PROJECTS Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group Downtown5 Asheville City of Asheville Area Cities 1 Mile NORTH 5.K 5.B 5.E 5.F 5.G4.B 5.I 5.H 3.C 5.C4.L 4.D 3.D 5.R 4.A 4.C 4.H 3.B 5.N 5.D 1.A 2.B 3.A 2.A 0.5 Miles DOWNTOWN ASHEVILLE
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
A. Spot Sidewalks (Prioritize East Side Completion)
4.C Woodfin & Oak Sts Entire St 13
B. Improved Crossings; ADA Upgrades
Southside Ave to Patton Ave (Preliminary Engineering Funded) Remaining Sections Need Accessibility Funding
4.E StLivingston
4.G DrLakeshore Shorewood Dr to
Fund Planning
3.D Valley St College St to Hazzard St 14
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath); Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades
2.B Haywood St Entire St 15
Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review
2.A AveLexington Entire St 15 Partially Funded (NCDOT# EB-5830)
St 12 Fund
2
3.C AveAsheland Patton Ave to Hilliard Ave 14
A. Improve Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations from Southside Ave to Patton Ave B. Crossings and ADA Upgrades for Remaining Corridor
4.A Church St Entire St 12
4.F
Review Remaining Corridor for ADA Compliance and Crossing Needs 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
B. Improved Crossings and ADA Upgrades
4.D College St Patton Ave to Spruce St 12
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) One Side with Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades; Consider Traffic Calming and Shorter Crossings Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades Hospital Dr Entire St
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review
Fund Planning to Address Remaining Pedestrian Needs
ADA Compliance Detailed ADA and Crossings Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review Merrimon Compliance
Pedestrian/ADA Needs
Hilliard Ave to Phifer SouthsideSt/Ave 14
Ave 12 ADA
ADA Condition DescriptionScan
ADA Upgrades; Improved & More Frequent Crossings (Consider Potential for Road Diet to Address Overlapping Bicycle Needs)
ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings for Sections Not Included in Recent Improvements 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
IDMap# NameRoad Segment ScoreTotal Funding Status Next Step
3.A Hilliard Ave Entire St 14
4.B Battery Park Ave Entire St 12
Pedestrian Project Descriptions
Clingman Ave/ Haywood St to Biltmore Ave 18
ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings (Reduce Pedestrian Crossing Widths) 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades
4
Review 2 Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review 4.H AveMontford Entire Street 12 Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review A. Spot Sidewalk B. Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap; ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 4.I Chestnut St Merrimon Ave to Broadway St 12 4.J RdKenilworth Tunnel Rd to Pickwick Rd 12 Fund Preliminary Eng A. Spot Sidewalks B. Sidewalk Extension from Aurora Dr to Beaucatcher Rd (Approx 1800 ft); Plus 2nd Side Spot Sidewalk for Transit; Crossings and ADA Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) One Side with Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 4.K Fairview Rd Sweeten Creek Rd to School Rd 12 Fund Planning A. Spot Sidewalks B. 2nd Side Spot Sidewalk for Transit Connections; Crossings and ADA Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) One Side with Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades 4.L College St Charlotte St to Spruce St 12 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Low Traffic Volumes and Wide Roadway ROW combined with Underutilized Land Use Make this Corridor a Candidate for a Land Use and Transportation Study
Complete Sidewalk Gaps One Side; Improved Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades
Planned Repaving Project (Includes ADA) Planned Protected Bike Lane Project (College St to Biltmore Ave)
A. Spot Sidewalks
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Entire Planning Confirm Needs with Livingston Neighborhood
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides; Improved Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades
ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades
ConditionADARating(1-5)
3.B AveAsheland
12
Review
1.A Patton Ave
Review and
Review
3
5.H N BroadFrenchAve Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA
ADA
A. Spot Sidewalk
– Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.C Walnut St Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 4 Moderate
and Improved Crossings 3
A. Detailed
B. Possible Additional Needs to Connect to Greenway (I-26 Project) Upgrades and Improved Crossings Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Roberts St Preliminary Eng and Crossings
Lyman TrafficExtClingmanSt/AvenorthtoCir 11 Fund
Sidewalk Gap(s) One Side with Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 3 Fair
11
Fund Spot Sidewalk Compliance
3
IDMap# NameRoad Segment ScoreTotal Funding Status Next Step Pedestrian Project Descriptions Pedestrian/ADA Needs ConditionADARating(1-5) ADA Condition DescriptionScan 5.A Shiloh Rd Entire St 11 Fund Planning Confirm Needs with Shiloh Neighborhood
– Needs Spot
5.F O'Henry Ave Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3
Complete Sidewalk Gap(s) Both Sides (or Sidepath); & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Condition ADA Upgrades Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Upgrades Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Hilliard Compliance Bike/Ped I-26
5.E Wall St Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair
Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review
A. Spot Sidewalk
5.M
Rd Fernihurst Dr to Meadow Rd 11 Fund Preliminary Eng & ADA Compliance Review A. Spot Sidewalks B. Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.N S BroadFrenchAve Hilliard Ave to Livingston St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.O Riverside Dr I-240 to I-26 Ramp 12 ADA Compliance Review Recently Constructed 2 Good Condition – Needs Compliance Review 5.P State St Entire Street 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.Q AveMurdock Entire Street 11 Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review A. Spot Sidewalk B. Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap; ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.R Hill St Montford Ave to Atkinson St 11 Fund Planning 2nd Side Spot Sidewalk for Transit Connections; Crossings and ADA Upgrades Transit Stops Connections; Improved & More Frequent Crossings; ADA Upgrades 4 Moderate Condition – Needs Many ADA Upgrades 5.S Wood Ave and Cedar St Wood Ave and Cedar St 11 Fund Preliminary Eng & ADA Compliance Review A. Spot Sidewalks B. Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap One Side with Transit Stops Connections; ADA and Crossing Upgrades 3 Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.T McDowellShort St Meadow Rd to McDowell St 11 Fund Spot Sidewalk ADA Compliance Review A. Spot Sidewalk B. Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades Complete Sidewalk Gap; ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 5 Poor Condition – Needs Significant ADA Upgrades
5.K Depot St Livingston St to Lyman ClingmanSt/Ave Ext Partially (NeighborhoodFundedGreenway)
ADA
3
– Needs Spot ADA Upgrades 5.B SquareBattle Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3 Fair
ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades
Complete Sidewalk Gap; ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Victoria Dr to Fernihurst
5.L
B. Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades
Connection Needs Due to
Improved
B. Detailed ADA and Crossing Review and Upgrades
Ave to Patton Ave Preliminary Engineering Funded) Remaining Sections Need Accessibility Funding
Complete Condition Condition Condition
5.I S BroadFrenchAve Patton Ave to
Review Evaluate Future
Rd Hospital
5.J
Ave 11 ADA
Dr 11
3
Complete Sidewalk Gap; ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings Fair Condition – Needs Spot ADA Upgrades Victoria
Southside
A.
New
5.G Otis St Entire St 11 ADA Compliance Review Detailed ADA and Crossings Review and Upgrades ADA Upgrades and Improved Crossings 3
– Needs Many ADA Upgrades 5.D Coxe Ave Entire St 11 Partially Funded (NCDOT# EB-5831)
Sidewalk One Side Sidewalk
Improve Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations from Southside Avenue to Patton Avenue B. Crossings and ADA Upgrades for Remaining Corridor
APPENDIX B: PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
• Traffic control signal APS upgrade retrofit: +/ $16,000 per intersection
• Bus Stop ADA improvement retrofit: +/ $800 per boarding and alighting area (does not include shelter)
The above unit costs do not include design, survey, traffic and pedestrian studies, work zone traffic control (beyond typical applications), drainage improvements, curb and gutter (beyond curb ramps) retaining walls, right-of-way, utility relocation, construction inspection fees, etc. These items will have significant impact on corridor upgrade cost estimates and therefore, preliminary engineering and estimates should be conducted prior to setting project budgets and limits of work, see Chapter 8 of the Close the GAP companion plan for more information on project Entirescoping.Jurisdiction
Based on the results of the self evaluation, the estimated* costs associated with providing ADA accessibility within the entire jurisdiction is $101,274,000*, as detailed in Table 1. This amount signifies a significant investment that The City of Asheville is committed to making in the upcoming years.
• Sidewalk / Trail ADA improvement retrofit: +/ $20 per SF (bituminous) $25 per SF (concrete)
• Sidewalk / Trail ADA simple maintenance / repair (e.g. cracks): +/ $8 per SF (bituminous), $17 per SF (concrete)
Construction costs for upgrading facilities can vary depending on each individual improvement and conditions of each site. Costs can also vary on the type and size of project the improvements are associated with. Listed below are representative 2022 costs for some typical accessibility improvements. These costs were used to generate planning level cost estimates for ADA improvement projects.
• Intersection corner ADA improvement retrofit: +/ $5,000 per ramp ($10,000 per corner)
Unit Prices
• Traffic signal upgrade to reposition push buttons for upgraded curb ramps (2 ramps per corner): +/ $50,000 per intersection
Assume 25% (2.3 miles) of Greenway will Require Barrier Removal for ADA Compliance (Intersection ramps included in ADA ramp database)
Estimated Cost* (Rounded Up to Nearest $1,000)
Element - City Public Rights of Way
Assume 100% of City Maintained Traffic Signals (20 signals)
*Cost Estimate Notes:
Curb Ramp Upgrades Assume Upgrade for 90% of Curb Ramps
$27,846,000
$2,672,000
Transit Stops
Signalized Intersections – Push Button and Ped Signals to Accompany Curb Ramp Upgrades
Assume 619 Existing Stops Require 8’x5’ Accessible Boarding and Alighting Areas $832,000
Total $101,274,000
• 40% Continency Added to Engineering/Survey and Construction Given High Level Planning Costs (10% for Simple Sidewalk and Greenway Replacement / Maintenance Work)
Sidewalk Repair
• 30% Added to Construction Costs for Engineering and Survey (Except for Sidewalk and Greenway Replacement / Maintenance Work)
Assume 50% (94 miles) of Sidewalks need Replacement
Table 1: Estimate of ProbableAccessibilityCosts
$1,680,000
$68,244,000
Greenway Upgrades and ADA Retrofits
• Table 1 does not include costs associated with Pedestrian or Traffic Studies, Right of Way Acquisition or Easements, Curb and Gutter (Beyond Ramps), Retaining Walls, Tree Impact Evaluations, Utility Adjustments, Drainage Design/Improvements, Work Zone Traffic Control (Beyond Typical Applications) or Construction Inspection These items will have significant impact on corridor upgrade cost estimates; therefore, preliminary engineering and estimates should be conducted prior to setting project budgets and limits of work, see Chapter 8 of the Close the GAP companion plan for more information on project scoping.
Bradley J. Stein
The complaint should be submitted by the grievant and/or his/her designee as soon as possible but no later than 180 calendar days after the alleged violation to:
APPENDIX C: GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ADA NOTICE
Phone: 828 259 5687
This Grievance Procedure is established to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"). It may be used by anyone who wishes to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, programs, or benefits by the City of Asheville. The City's Personnel Policy governs employment related complaints of disability discrimination.
City of Asheville Grievance Procedure Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
City of Asheville Risk Manager / ADA Coordinator P.O. Box Asheville,7148NC 28802
Email: Withinbstein@ashevillenc.gov15calendardaysafterreceipt of the complaint, Brad Stein or his designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and the possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days of the meeting, Brad Stein or his designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, such as large print, Braille, or audio tape. The response will explain the position of the City of Asheville and offer options for substantive resolution of the complaint.
The complaint should be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of complainant and location, date, and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing complaints, such as personal interviews or a tape recording of the complaint, will be made available for persons with disabilities upon request.
If the response by Brad Stein or his designee does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant and/or his/her designee may appeal the decision within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response to the [City Manager/County Commissioner/ other appropriate high-level official] or [his/her]
Withindesignee.15calendar
days after receipt of the appeal, the [City Manager/County Commissioner/ other appropriate high-level official] or [his/her] designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the [City Manager/County Commissioner/ other appropriate high-level official] or [his/her] designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final resolution of the complaint.
All written complaints received by Brad Stein or his designee, appeals to the [City Manager/County Commissioner/ other appropriate high-level official] or [his/her] designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained by the City of Asheville for at least three years.
Contact Information
City of Asheville Risk Manager / ADA Coordinator P.O. Box Asheville,7148NC 28802
The name, address, telephone number, and email address for the person filing the grievance.
File Maintenance
Contact the pertinent City of Asheville staff person listed in the Contact Information to submit an oral grievance. The staff person will utilize the Internet method above to submit the grievance on behalf of the person filing the grievance.
The name, address, telephone number, and email address for the person alleging an ADA violation (if different than the person filing the grievance).
The ADA Grievance Form will ask for the following information:
Visit the City of Asheville website (https://www.ashevillenc.gov/department/finance/americans with disabilities act/) and click the “ADA” link to the ADA Title II Grievance Form. Fill in the form online and send to the pertinent City of Asheville staff person listed in the Contact Information.
Bradley J. Stein
Paper Submittal
Those wishing to file a formal written grievance with The City of Asheville may do so by one of the following methods:
If the complainant has filed the same complaint or grievance with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), another federal or state civil rights agency, a court, or others, the name of the agency or court where the complainant filed it and the filing date.
Telephone
Contact Information
Phone: 828 259 5687 Email: bstein@ashevillenc.gov
A description and location of the alleged violation and the nature of a remedy sought, if known by the complainant.
The City of Asheville shall maintain ADA grievance files for a period of seven years.
Internet
Contact the pertinent City of Asheville staff person listed in the Contact Information to request a paper copy of the county’s grievance form, complete the form, and submit it. A staff person will utilize the Internet method above to submit the grievance on behalf of the person filing the grievance.
Complaints of Title II violations may also be filed with the DOJ within 180 days of the date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve violations.
For more information, contact:
Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the DOJ or any other Federal agency, or to receive a "right to sue" letter, before going to court.
U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Disability Rights Section NYAV Washington, D.C. 20530 (800)www.ada.gov5140301 (voice toll free) (800) 514 0383 (TTY)
Modifications to Policies and Procedures: City of Asheville will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City of Asheville offices, even where pets are generally prohibited.
City of Asheville 70 Court Telephone:Asheville,PlazaNC28801828259 5687
as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event. The ADA does not require the City of Asheville to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or services, or impose an undue financial or administrative burden.
PO Box 7148 Asheville, NC 28802 Telephone 828 259 5687
Bradof: Stein, ADA Coordinator
City of Asheville Public Posting: Americans with Disabilities Act
Complaints that a program, service, or activity of City of Asheville is not accessible to persons with disabilities should be directed to:
In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), the City of Asheville will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities.
City of Asheville, Risk Management Division
Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a program, service, or activity of City of Asheville, should contact the office
Employment: City of Asheville does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title I of the ADA.
Effective Communication: City of Asheville will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally in City of Asheville’s programs, services, and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents in Braille, and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments.
City of Asheville will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable modifications of policy, such as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use wheelchairs.
Brad Stein, ADA Coordinator
Fax: 828 259 5686
Risk Management Division
City of Asheville Title II: Grievance Form
Design Standards
APPENDIX D: ADA STANDARDS
Sidewalks and trails will be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects to the maximum extent feasible. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for segments of sidewalks or trails to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, every sidewalk or trail shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff. Those limitations will be noted and those segments will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those segments shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, each intersection corner shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff. Those limitations will be noted and those intersection corners will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those intersection corners shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
Sidewalks / Trails
On Street Parking will be located and or constructed to achieve compliance. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, each parking space shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff.
Traffic control signals will be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects to the maximum extent feasible There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for individual traffic control signal locations to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, each traffic signal shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff. Those limitations will be noted and those locations will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those locations shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
On Street Parking
The City of Asheville intends to adopt the proposed Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) as its design standard. A copy of this document can be found at the following link online: https://www.access board.gov/prowag/.
Curb ramps or blended transitions will be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects to the maximum extent feasible. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for an intersection corner to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project
Traffic Control Signals
Intersection Corners
Bus Stops
Bus stops will be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects to the maximum extent feasible. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for individual bus stop locations to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, each transit stop shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff. Those limitations will be noted and those locations will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those locations shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
Overlap with non PROWAG requirements ADA Design Procedures
Additional transit facilities are present within the limits of The City of Asheville. Those facilities fall under the jurisdiction of Transit Provider. The City of Asheville will work with Transit Provider to ensure that those facilities meet all appropriate accessibility standards.
Street Crossings
Other policies, practices and programs
Policies, practices and programs not identified in this document will follow the applicable ADA standards.
FHWA Guidance on Closing Pedestrian Crossings
• A physical barrier is required to close a crossing at an intersection. FHWA has determined that a strip of grass between the sidewalk and the curb IS acceptable as a physical barrier.
• The agency wishing to close certain intersection crossings should have a reasonable and consistent policy on when to do so written in their Transition Plan or as a standalone document. If safety concerns are established by an engineering study, a pedestrian crossing should not be accommodated for any user. The City should also develop and implement a policy on how to close those crossings that are established based on the existing conditions at the crossing location (e.g., existing sidewalk leading up to the curb in the direction of the crossing or existing curb ramp or crosswalk serving the crossing).
• A sign should be used to communicate the closure.
Other Transit Facilities
Street crossings will be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all projects to the maximum extent feasible. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for a crossing to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Regardless of whether full compliance can be achieved or not, each street crossing shall be made as compliant as possible within the scope of the project in accordance with the judgment of City of Asheville staff. Those limitations will be noted and those crossings will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those crossings shall continue to be incorporated into future work.
An alteration that decreases or has the effect of decreasing the accessibility of a facility below the requirements for new construction at the time of the alternation is prohibited. For example, the removal of an existing curb ramp or sidewalk (without equivalent replacement) is prohibited. However, the FHWA has indicated a crossing may be closed if an engineering study (performed by the City and not included in the scope of this Transition Plan) determines the crossing is not safe for any user. The crossing should be closed by doing the following:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act; Civil rights legislation passed in 1990 and effective July 1992. The ADA sets design guidelines for accessibility to public facilities, including sidewalks and trails, by individuals with disabilities.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): The CIP for the Transportation Department includes an annual capital budget and a five year plan for funding the new construction and reconstruction projects on the county’s transportation system.
APPENDIX E: GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Alteration: A change to a facility in the public rights of way that affects or could affect access, circulation, or use. An alteration must not decrease or have the effect of decreasing the accessibility of a facility or an accessible connection to an adjacent building or site.
ADA Transition Plan: The City of Asheville’s transportation system plan that identifies accessibility needs, the process to identify methods to ensure that all transportation facilities, services, programs, and activities are accessible to all individuals.
Architectural Barriers Act (ABA): Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment.
Pedestrian Access Route (PAR): A continuous and unobstructed walkway within a pedestrian circulation path that provides that is accessible to and usable by people with disabilities
FHWA: See Federal Highway Administration
APS: See Accessible Pedestrian Signal.
DOJ: See United States Department of Justice
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): A branch of the US Department of Transportation that administers the federal aid Highway Program, providing financial assistance to states to construct and improve highways, urban and rural roads, and bridges.
Accessible: A facility that is accessible to and usable by people with disabilities using the design requirements of the ADA.
ADAAG: See Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines.
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG): contains scoping and technical requirements for accessibility to buildings and public facilities by individuals with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.
ABA: See Architectural Barriers Act.
ADA: See Americans with Disabilities Act.
Detectable Warning: A surface feature of truncated domes, built in or applied to the walking surface to indicate an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way.
Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS): A device that communicates information about the WALK phase in audible and vibrotactile formats.
PROWAG: An acronym for the proposed Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights of Way issued in 2011 by the U. S. Access Board. This guidance addresses roadway design practices, slope, and terrain related to pedestrian access to walkways and streets, including crosswalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking, and other components of public rights of way.
United States Department of Justice (DOJ): The United States Department of Justice (often referred to as the Justice Department or DOJ), is the United States federal executive department responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice.
Pedestrian Circulation Route (PCR): A prepared exterior or interior way of passage provided for pedestrian travel.
Right-of-Way: A general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for the network of streets, sidewalks, and trails creating public transportation access within a public entity’s jurisdictional limits.
United States Access Board: An independent federal agency that develops and maintains design criteria for buildings and other improvements, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and electronic and information technology. It also enforces accessibility standards for Federal facilities covered under the Architectural Barriers Act.
Section 504: The section of the Rehabilitation Act that prohibits discrimination by any program or activity conducted by the federal government.
