|
Issue 23
|
March 29, 2011
Photo by Holly Norris
Volume 45
Queerlines Check out the TQC’s annual supplement, p. 7-‐14.
ARTHUR VOLUME 46 ELECTIONS This year, three different slates of editors want to woo you with their visions for the incumbent volume of our fine little student and community press. You can turn to pages 4 and 5 for some inspiring editorial platforms. You can also stop by Sadleir House this Wednesday, March 30 at 6 p.m. to hear these Editor-inChief hopefuls deliver speeches, ask some questions, and vote for your candidate(s) of choice (if you’re on the Staff Collective).
CONTEMPT! By Chris Chang-Yen Phillips Prime Minister Stephen Harper went to the Governor-General David Johnston’s official residence at Rideau Hall on March 26, asking him to officially send Canadians into a May 2 federal election. The election’s kickoff follows the Conservatives’ loss of a no-confidence vote the day before that found the minority government in contempt of Parliament. Federal opposition leaders had been ramping up election rhetoric for weeks in anticipation of the 2011-2012 budget’s release on March 22. Only the specific issue and timing were in question after House of Commons Speaker Peter Milliken’s recent ruling that “on the face of it” there was enough evidence to suggest contempt of Parliament over the government’s failure to produce key budget documents and Minister Bev Oda’s likely attempts to mislead fellow MPs. All three opposition parties had earlier said they would not support the proposed budget, and Conservatives made clear they were not willing to change it. The budget seemed largely designed as a package of election proposals, including $2 billion in new spending in areas like
loan forgiveness for rural doctors and a onetime reintroduction of the ecoEnergy retrofit program. NDP leader Jack Layton said the $300 top-up to the Guaranteed Income Supplement for seniors and other measures targeted at his party’s demands did not go nearly far enough. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff put forward the no-confidence resolution, citing the report produced by the House of Commons committee on procedure and house affairs that found the government had unjustly withheld vital documents on the cost of maintaining Canada’s current CF-18 warplanes, purchasing a fleet of new F-35s, and projecting the costs of corporate tax cuts. The opposition-dominated committee’s report found the government had not provided any reasonable excuse for withholding the documents, and that the failure was preventing the House from performing its duties. “We are the people’s representatives,” Ignatieff said before the vote. “When the government spends money, the people have a right to know what it is to be spent on. This Parliament does not write blank cheques.”
Continued on 16