architecture & graphic design portfolio
treymcmillon.com
selected works 2012-2021
C O N T E N TS 03
Resumé
04
Sutherland Corridor
10
SYNC - NYC
16
Interpreting the Landscape
Spring 17
24
Armature House
Spring 16
30
Deconstruct the Box
Fall 15
36
United States Federal Courthouse
Spring 15
42
Gerhard Richter Art Gallery
Fall 12
46
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Spring 12
Big Ideas for Small Lots Competition
Big Ideas for Small Lots Competition
ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
ARCH 5716 with K. Edge
ARCH 5715 with K. Edge
ARCH 4012 with A. Economou
ARCH 3011 with J. LeBlanc
ARCH 2012 with D. Baerlecken, K. Johnson, & C. Hunter
Fall 20
Knoxville, TN
Spring 19
New York City, NY
Niobrara, NE
Blacksburg, VA
Fairlawn, VA
Greenville, SC
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
01
treymcmillon.com
T R E Y M c M I L LO N EXPERIENCE
AIA
Project Architect
September 2019 - Present
Architectural Designer
May 2017 - April 2019
Graduate Assistant
October 2015 - May 2017
Architectural Intern
May 2016 - August 2016
Interior Design Intern
May 2015 - August 2015
American Institute of Architects
October 2020 - Present
United Way of Greater Knoxville
October 2019 - Present
PARK(ing) Day Knoxville
June 2018 - Present
Master of Architecture
August 2015 - May 2017
Bachelor of Science in Architecture
August 2010 - May 2015
BarberMcMurry Architects Involved in owner/client and internal meetings, participated in reviews, and code compliance Coordinated work of multidisciplinary teams through multiple phases of projects Produced full presentation packages, construction documents, and project schedules
C3 Studio Acted as project manager from schematics to construction on all commercial and civic work Developed concepts and presentations for $1M+ redevelopment along South Knox Waterfront Improved project scheduling and budgeting efficiency via new tracking methods
The Global Forum on Urban & Regional Resilience Generated visualizations for urban and financial research initiatives Participated in community-oriented design strategies for campus resiliency Initiated campus infrastructure research project that was presented internationally
McMillan Pazdan Smith Assisted in three-dimensional BIM and two-dimensional construction drawings Participated in early design process of new projects and fostered client relations Reviewed drawings and construction process through site visits with architects
Cortland Developed and implemented company standards for CAD and project delivery Provided design insight for multi-family community renovations Produced comprehensive interior drawings for construction
LEADERSHIP
East Tennessee Chapter | Community Outreach Committee Programmed educational and awareness outreach activities Composed annual calendar for the committee activities including critical dates Acted as a sounding board for community-focused messages and public relations
Campaign Chair Organized in-office campaign for BarberMcMurry Architects Planned marketing and communications strategy Achieved 100% employee participation and raised more than $22,000
Executive Committee Coordinated 30+ organizations in city-wide community/design event Advertised event through range of platforms and media outlets Managed day-of procedures including set-up, operations, and clean-up
EDUCATION
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
RECOGNITION
Graphics
Adobe Creative Suite ArcGIS AutoCAD Sketching
BIM + 3D Enscape Revit Rhino 3D SketchUp
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, TN
Blacksburg, VA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, TN
Blacksburg, VA
Georgia Institute of Technology
SKILLS
trey.mcmillon@gmail.com 706.974.0606
Atlanta, GA
Project Management Budgeting Collaboration Scheduling Specifications
Other
Bluebeam Dynamo Microsoft Office Model Making
Selected Works Published
October 2020
Featured Artist
April 2019 - Present
Design Jury Finalist
December 2017
Visual Communication for Architects and Designers
Dogwood Arts Festival Chalk Walk
Passageways 2.0 Alleyway Activation Challenge
Atlanta, GA
Knoxville, TN
Chattanooga, TN
Sutherland Ave Corridor
S U T H E R L A N D AV E C O R R I D O R East Tennessee Community Design Center
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2020 Knoxville, TN Community Collaborative | with C. Boetger, A. Cahill M. Travis, & O. Poston This proposal seeks not only to anticipate the needs of an expanding urban environment, but to invest in healthy and sustainable relationships through public spaces. Anticipating an influx of families and young professionals to this area of Marble City, various living typologies will intermingle across the site, connecting through public walkways and community gardens. Each living environment is designed as a prefabricated modular system; to encourage and ease the process of expanding in future developments. Mixed use buildings face the now pedestrian centric Sutherland and Cary street-scapes, creating intersecting corridors of retail and entertainment. This new urban scale mixed with generous private and public spaces brings added value for both the individual and the community. The 9.88 acre site has been divided in half by retaining Cary Street as a shared corridor for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles. A series of courtyards create community gardens to be shared by residents and farm-to-table restaurants located along Sutherland Avenue and Division Street. The first townhouse sits on a gentle incline. Inside the entry, moments of activity are framed in the shadowbox window, while the private spaces face the walkways and community gardens. Along the front facade, balconies provide views of the community park and gardens. The exterior of the townhouses are wrapped in standing seam metal while the interior spaces are framed in locally sourced timber. The metal wrap is pulled back on the exterior corners to reveal the transition to the green ways. This project was completed at BarberMcMurry Architects.
04
Community Collaborative | with C. Boetger, A. Cahill, M. Travis, & O. Poston
Sutherland Ave Corridor
06
Community Collaborative | with C. Boetger, A. Cahill, M. Travis, & O. Poston
Townhouse 01 | 1 Bedroom + Roof Terrace
Townhouse 02 | 3 Bedroom + Roof Terrace
07
SYNC - NYC
SY N C - N YC Big Ideas for Small Lots
YEAR
2019
LOCATION
New York City, NY
PROJECT
Competition Entry
The intent of SYNC — NYC is to provide an affordable housing option to nearly 25 small and undeveloped lots throughout New York City. The common themes of transparency, light, and connectivity link the sites to each other, to the city, and to the conceptual design that SYNC — NYC offers. The dense urban fabric of New York City is the ideal condition to explore the benefit of offering residents an affordable housing option that seeks to more strongly connect them to the environs of the city, while also providing privacy and security in an engaging way. The proposed solution creates a synchrony between the individual sites and their development in a way that enhances the streetscape and the lives of those who will take up residency. The design goal of SYNC — NYC is to provide as much light as possible to the individual units as well as introduce a layer of transparency uncommonly found in residential projects. The primary circulation operates both vertically and horizontally through the building and functions as a large lightwell that directs sunlight in to each unit via translucent openings from the stairwell to the units. The stairs also provide a subtle barrier between indoor and outdoor spaces, while encouraging interactions between the tenants. Internally, the units are optimized to work at a standardized 11’-6” width. Each of the units are also designed so that spaces stack vertically with rooms in the same location on each floor - eliminating the need to reconfigure by lot and prefabricate as much as possible to reduce cost. The main corridor through each unit is placed so that, although the front door to the apartments are in different locations, the main entry feels natural and welcoming to whichever portion of the unit you are entering.
10
Urban Infill Design Competition | Competition Entry
1 Att 13 W ach est ed 136 I nte th rior Stre
et W Att est ach 130 ed th I nte Stre rior et
4 Att 63 E ach ast ed 159 I nte th rior Stre et
W Att est ach 129 ed th S I nte tre rior et W Att est ach 126 ed th S I nte tre rior et W Att est ach 119 ed th S I nte tree rior t
P Att utna ach m ed Ave I nte nue rior
2 Att 334 ach Ti l ed den I nte Av rior e
7 Att 08 H ach an ed coc I nte k S rior tree t 7 Att 06A ach Ha ed nco I nte ck rior Stre et 4 Att 05 E ach ast ed 161 I nte st S rior tree t
4 Att 06 N ach os ed tran Co d A rne ven r 1 Att 612 L ach exi ed ngto Co n A rne ve r nue
ue
1 De 3 ta
12
en
ue
R Sh ocka al lo wa w yB
ou
S Sh t. Ma al lo rk’ w s Av en
ue
8 Sh 29 F al lo ree w ma
+E ast
Ne w
nS tre
Yor k
lev ard
Ave n
ue
et
S De outh tac Ra he i l ro d ad
Str e
et (B
)
S De outh tac Ra he i l ro d ad
Str e
et (A
)
T De angle tac wo he od d D
rive
H De arbo tac r R he oad d
M De etrop tac ol he itan d Ave n
ue
H De ighv tac iew he d Aven
ue
33 t ach h Ave ed nue
13
SYNC - NYC
14
Urban Infill Design Competition | Competition Entry
113
15
Interpreting the Landscape
ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
I N T E R P R E T I N G T H E L A N D S CA P E Cartographic Re-Presentation
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2017 Niobrara, NE ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
There is a disconnect between how one experiences the landscape and how one represents the landscape. There are physical objects and quantitative data that define a landscape, or site to put it in architectural terms. However, there are also ethereal impressions and representative abstractions that define the site with equal influence. Although a proxy for substantive information, maps have become abstract and purely systematic methods for ordering the site in to an understandable format. Defining political boundaries, property lines, trade routes, and natural and built environs only gives a partial interpretation of the landscape. Similarly, the way in which these constructs are symbolized lends a hand in how the landscape is understood and managed. Mapping more theoretical topographies, such as the culture or economy, of a site becomes the new challenge – and one that we should dare to undertake in today’s political climate. Not only in how it is defined and quantified for visualization, but also in how those visualizations take shape. Unlike rivers or railroads, there are no graphic standards for how to map the emotional response that one feels when standing in a space. To create a methodology by which a site can be understood, we can challenge these common cartographic standards on a variety of levels that influence how a designer might choose to intervene. Due to the uniqueness of individual sites and the qualitative nature of spatial and material decisions, designs are typically tailored to its own particular site in order to avoid becoming unfit or improper. What is too steep versus what is too shallow on one site becomes a null argument on another. This is true of both the physical and metaphysical site.
16
Silt
Clay_Silt
Sand
Sand_Gravel
Sand
Supratype_53
Supratype_36
Supratype_47
ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
Supratype_86
Supratype_77
Supratype_41
Interpreting the Landscape
Clay
17
Interpreting the Landscape
Function
Function
Movement
Sequence
House
Cu lture _In te
Anticipation
Repetition
Society
Structure
Organization
Service
Surface
Interaction
ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
rac
tion
Customs + Traditions
Op era ti
on _C ult
ure
Church
Religion
Museum Library
Language
Cemetery Arts + Literature
Retail Government
io ract Inte r n_P ogr
Theater
am
Economy
Food + Clothing
ration
Merge
Taper
Split
Embed
Compress
Overlap
Bend
Branch
Expand
Program
Operation
m_Ope Progra
Office
18
School
Music + Dance
03_Territorial
02_Regional
01_Local
Interpreting the Landscape
Supratype_41
Supratype_47
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_G OR_Lo #_55 %KX_9.16
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_Lo #_31 %KX_5.17
Supratype_77
Supratype_36
SH_S SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_R SZ_1.0 HT_1.5 RF_G OR_La #_30 %KX_5.00
Supratype_86
Supratype_53
SH_S SZ_2.0 HT_2.0 RF_HT OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.5 RF_G OR_Lo #_29 %KX_4.83
20
ARCH 5994 | Research + Thesis
Geometry_01
Geometry_04
Geometry_07
Geometry_10
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_G OR_Lo #_55 %KX_9.16
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_G OR_Lo #_55 %KX_9.16
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_G OR_Lo #_55 %KX_9.16
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_Lo #_31 %KX_5.17
Geometry_02
Geometry_05
Geometry_08
Geometry_11
SH_S SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_S SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_S SZ_1.5 HT_1.0 RF_H OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_R SZ_1.0 HT_1.5 RF_G OR_La #_30 %KX_5.00
Geometry_03
Geometry_06
Geometry_09
Geometry_12
SH_S SZ_2.0 HT_2.0 RF_HT OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_S SZ_2.0 HT_2.0 RF_HT OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_S SZ_2.0 HT_2.0 RF_HT OR_N #_44 %KX_7.33
SH_R SZ_1.5 HT_1.5 RF_G OR_Lo #_29 %KX_4.83
21
As a built object, the structure works to allow views around and through the site to see the extending landscape. By creating voids shaped that are shaped by the programmatic elements, there are remaining spaces that expose the exterior space and frame the landscape and horizon. This allows the site to become an extension of the building and an object that works with the space in order to enhance the understanding of its surroundings.
23
Armature House
A R M AT U R E H O U S E Live | Work | Sell
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2016 Blacksburg, VA ARCH 5716 | with K. Edge
The process for this project was divided in to three major sections: Site + Form Analysis, Form Selection + General Concept, and Material + Structure. These three separate, but related process of analyzing, evaluating, and designing the site allowed for a greater range of influence in approaching the project. The project started with an in depth understanding and analysis of the site. Two lots just one block off of South Main Street in Blacksburg, Virginia provided the land for the project. Understanding the way in which Blacksburg breaks down in to zones and districts was the foundation of the site analysis and ultimately reoccurring theme in the overall project. The program for the project stemmed from a new arts district in Blacksburg known as the Live | Work | Sell Zone, an existing residential zone that allows home owners and leasees to combine a living area, studio, and gallery in to one space. Given the opportunity to pick an artist to inhabit the space, the studio was charged with the task of combining these three programs in to a single building suitable for the chosen artist. Ideas about connection, whether physical or not, became important in the project. Regardless of physical intersection in the space, there needed to be a clear connection or view to the space in order for the building to work. The house began to revolve around the idea of separate spaces being intruded on either by a common space or by views from another area of the house. The necessity to separate the spaces entirely was due to a level of respect for private versus public spaces.
24
ARCH 5716 | with K. Edge
Live | Work | Sell
Downtown District
Typologies + Program Arrangements
Parks + Green Space
Historic District
Overlapping Programs
Sixteen Squares
25
Armature House
26
ARCH 5716 | with K. Edge
Armature House
ARCH 5716 | with K. Edge
27
Deconstruct the Box
D E C O N ST R U C T T H E B OX Big Box Store Renovation
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2015 Fairlawn, VA ARCH 5715 | with K. Edge
Reuse the Box - a design studio that begins with an ordinary vacant building in a particular kind of setting. Ordinary buildings when thoughtfully addressed can create beautiful urban and suburban spaces. It is our charge (and specifically suited to our expertise) to show communities the potential of our surroundings and to fulfill a role as stewards of the environment, not only in the sense of sustainability but also in the sense of beauty. By separating the buildings a number of design problems are solved. The site becomes more open, the buildings more intimate, and the program divides evenly between the two new forms. Nearly everything from the existing structure is retained. CMU walls, fire-proofed columns, and open web steel joists speak to the history of the building and the site. Cuts were made along the column grid and large cantilevered roofs create a horizontality that keeps the connection between the two buildings. Large glass curtain walls take the place of the void that would have been left when bisecting the structure. This leads to a visual interest between the two buildings where three architectural spaces are created - the cafe and lobby of the auxiliary building, the outdoor procession between the buildings, and the stacks and reading space of the main library building. The 16-acre site has been carved up to more efficiently provide vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The central parking of the existing site was not conducive to providing a walkable area. While retaining several of the surrounding buildings, along with some new construction, the green space and roadways allows for seamless movement.
30
ARCH 5715 | with K. Edge
Deconstruct the Box
Configuration Study
ARCH 5715 | with K. Edge
Column Grid
Possible Configuration
Chosen Configuration
Deconstruct the Box
Ground Floor
Northeast Elevation
Northwest Elevation
32
ARCH 5715 | with K. Edge
Mezzanine
Deconstruct the Box
ARCH 5715 | with K. Edge
Southwest Elevation
Southeast Elevation
33
United States Federal Building
ARCH 4012 | with A. Economou
U N I T E D STAT E S F E D E R A L B U I L D I N G Justice Through Equality
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2015 Greenville, SC ARCH 4012 | with A. Economou
A key aspect in designing a federal courthouse is that the organization of, and presentation of space, must be inherently just. The integrity of the justice system is lost if the design of its federal buildings do not reflect the same sense of democracy that the system represents. My goal was to portray this democracy, almost in a literal way. There is a clear hierarchy among public corridors and lobbies, restricted offices, secure holding cells, and courtrooms in use by all of the above. But within those categories, equality is the defining factor in portraying to the average citizen that the U.S. government is being as fair and just as it can be. The driving force behind my design was to keep all courtrooms on one level. This allows for no court or judge to be given any preference over another. The courtrooms are also all on the ground floor. This is in order to keep the building simple for the public. They have a large urban yard before entering and a large lobby just within the front doors. Only occupants who work and spend a great deal of time there need to penetrate the building further. The U.S. Marshals are given a mezzanine-like space on the 2nd floor. This gives them the security they need and symbolically gives them views of the lobby of the courthouse. Other offices, as well as the judges’ chambers, are on the 3rd floor. The judges are separated, physically and symbolically, from the general office space. This is also the space above the plaza as keeping them in the front of the building was important to me. As the driving force of the court proceedings, they needed full dominion of the site.
36
United States Federal Building
Courthouse Modules
Courtroom
ARCH 4012 | with A. Economou
Restricted Circulation
Secure Circulation
Public Circulation
37
United States Federal Building
38
ARCH 4012 | with A. Economou
Gerhard Richter Art Gallery
ARCH 3011 | with J. LeBlanc
G E R H A R D R I C H T E R A RT G A L L E RY A New Lawn for Atlanta
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2012 Atlanta, GA ARCH 3011 | with J. LeBlanc
Gardens and museums have a long history. The Richter Gallery, located on a site between 10th Street and Peachtree Place introduces a public garden across from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. The idea was to draw visitors in through the strong, slightly off-center axis and lead them up to the second and third floors by use of an elevator directly along the main line of procession. The glass elevator at the rear of the building presents a strong focal point for anyone passing the building from the front or the back. Another focal point is the large cantilever, an “object floating in space,” that allows for an impressive view of the city. The large north-facing window also creates naturally lighting without causing directly sunlight to any interior spaces. The line of trees in the lawn creates a dialectic that rhymes with the roof of the museum. A library also serves the museum on the first floor, as well as a small cafe. After entering the lobby, visitors are encouraged to move directly to the elevator, made evident by the strong linear axis through the window on the opposite side. The elevator and stairs are both treated as objects within the space. The stairs counter the axiality on the right side by creating a tall mass that runs straight through the top of the second floor. The third floor, the Richter Gallery, acts as a mezzanine that ends just short of the window on the north face. The museum was designed with two particular Richter pieces in mind: ‘11 Panes’ + ‘7 Standing Panes.’ These two pieces directly led to the design of the cantilever and large glass aperture to the interior of the museum. Reflecting the proportions and transparency of Richter’s art, the museum aims to bring his ideals to the exterior of the city of Atlanta.
42
Gerhard Richter Art Gallery
3rd Floor
2nd Floor
Ground Floor
Basement
44
ARCH 3011 | with J. LeBlanc
Section A-A
Section B-B
45
Federal Reserve Bank
ARCH 2012 | with D. Baerlecken, K. Johnson, & C. Hunter
F E D E R A L R E S E RV E BA N K Textile Studio
YEAR LOCATION PROJECT
2012 Atlanta, GA ARCH 2012 | with D. Baerlecken, K. Johnson, and C. Hunter
Textile-based patterns were the basis for this studio. The process began with understanding the mathematical principals behind plaiting and experimenting with a number of materials. From there, applications to the facade of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta could be tested. The interweaving structure of plaiting corresponds to the systematic duality of the Federal Reserve Banks a privately-owned, government regulated, federal establishment. Structurally, the diagonal strands provide for a rigid system which may correlate to the necessity of the bank to remain financially stable. Timber “strands” seemingly grow upward from the ground and gradually make their way to the top of the building. New plaited surfaces are constructed and then interlocked with one another to recreate the defining enclosure. Due to the fluctuating nature of twill pattern new spaces emerge along the surface and at the corners. Highlights of a new surface draw attention to the reconnected program These changes create a new visible interest in the structure of the Federal Reserve banking system. By moving the circulation to the interstitial space between the public and private areas a clearer line can be delineated between the two programmatic areas. The bi-modal nature of this space also for a circulation method structured around moving upward along one axis, while move downward along another axis. The resulting over/under pattern is continued by creasing or curling each element over or under itself so that it may continue to be incorporated into the pattern. When the end of a strand is reached, the pattern may be ended or continued by adhering a secondary strand to the bottom. It is at these points that additions can be made such as splitting into multiple levels.
46
Federal Reserve Bank
MS
Strand Configurations
1/1
ARCH 2012 | with D. Baerlecken, K. Johnson, & C. Hunter
ML
Needs More Strands
2/2
3/3 MS
1/2
Needs More Length
1/3
NP
2/3
Not Possible
2/4
3/4
MS
1-1
NP
MS
2-2
MS
MS
1-2
ML
ML
ALT
47
Federal Reserve Bank
10th Street Elevation
Peachtree Walk Elevation
48
ARCH 2012 | with D. Baerlecken, K. Johnson, & C. Hunter
11th Street Elevation
Peachtree Street Elevation
49
architecture & graphic design portfolio
treymcmillon.com