Truman State University tmn.truman.edu THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 tmn.truman.edu
@TrumanMediaNet TrumanMediaNetwork
FEATURES | Students speak about experience with emotional support animals Page 7
SPORTS | Family night football game hit with unexpected delays Page 14
Family Day 2017
Saturday, Sept. 16 saw thousands of students and their family members arrive in Kirksville. The longtime tradition included the Red Barn Arts and Crafts Festival, a cookout and the first home football game of the year. See FAMILY DAY, page 5
Truman explores compensation possibilities BY SETH WOLFMEYER Editor-in-Chief
Tensions rise over proposal to elminate academic programs
Truman State University started a process to examine and improve personnel compensation, as the University faces concerns from staff and faculty about salaries. The goal is to have a plan by April so it can be included in next year’s budget. Administration is collecting data to compare Truman’s salaries against those of other competitive organizations, and Truman started forming a committee for staff salary and benefits which will look at that data to create a plan to address those frustrations. Staff Council Chair Ryan Miller said she has heard multiple complaints from Truman’s staff about compensation, including frustrations from a lack of promotion opportunities and not receiving raises when doing additional or exemplary work. She also said some assistant office staff members have second jobs to help support themselves. Miller said Truman had staff fill out surveys earlier this year which gave the staff compensation committee information on how to improve staff salary and benefits to match what the University’s current personnel want changed.
Photo by Daniel Degenhardt/TMN Truman State University’s Undergraduate Council meets in the Student Union Building Thursday, Sept. 14. UGC is a subcommittee of Faculty Senate, the body which assists in academic matters regarding the University and acts in an advisory role for the administration. BY BRENTLY SNEAD Managing Editor
Photo by Bethany Travis/TMN Dave Rector, vice president of administration, finance and planning, speaks about staff compensation at the strategic planning and assesment workshop Aug. 18, 2017. University President Sue Thomas said it is no secret many people think staff salaries are low, and she said she agrees Truman needs to be more competitive in compensating staff and faculty. Thomas said the main challenges the University is facing are the low likelihood of Truman receiving more state funding and reallocating funds for staff compensation. “If we want to continue to keep bringing the very best people here for Truman, we need to make sure we’re as competitive as possible,” Thomas said. See COMPENSATION, page 5
Faculty members recently received an email listing recommended changes to programs at Truman State University which has prompted by some faculty and Janet Gooch, executive vice president of academic affairs and provost, in compliance with a request from the Missouri Department of Higher Education. Though deans and some faculty members worked alongside Gooch to make the recommendations, Faculty Senate members voiced their frustrations at the meeting Aug. 24 when Gooch reported the recommendations. Gooch sent a faculty email announcing the changes Aug. 16. Gooch said the MDHE made a request for information on programs with low enrollment as part of their review system for public universities. Gooch said every few years, the University receives a list of programs to discuss and make appropriate suggestions for how to move forward. Gooch said this year, the University received a list of 27 programs to review, though some the University had not offered in years. She said she worked alongside the deans of each school — who worked with their department chairs and other
faculty members — to make proper recommendations for their programs. “Essentially, we had to decide, in the context of this information — are we in a position to continue offering these majors on campus?” Gooch said. Faculty Senate member Stephen Pollard said he was confused about how the recommendations had been made without being discussed within Faculty Senate. “If it is an ‘academic matter’ to close, no longer offer or inactivate academic programs, then this matter falls within Senate’s deliberative and legislative responsibilities,” Pollard said. “If such closures, etc. ‘affect faculty and academic community,’ they fall within Senate’s advisory responsibilities. I would ask — is it consistent with Board policy to take these actions without consulting Senate?” Although these changes are considered recommendations, Gooch’s email to the faculty said the University will no longer offer baccalaureate degrees in Russian and art history, though the University will continue to offer courses in those disciplines. The University will also be placing the master’s degree in Biology on inactive status and changing the current athletic training program to an entry-level master’s degree program. See PROGRAMS, page 3
Legislation requires common curriculum BY NICOLAS TELEP News Text Editor
Submitted photo The Missouri House of Representatives meets in its chamber in the State Capitol in Jefferson City, Missouri. The House passed Missouri Senate Bill 997 with little opposition, clearing the way for it to become law and requiring a 42 credit-hour block of common core curriculum for all public colleges and universities in Missouri. VOLUME 109 ISSUE 5 © 2017
The Missouri Department of Higher Education is developing a block of common courses among public colleges and universities to comply with a state law signed last year. The General Assembly passed the law in May 2016 and former Gov. Jay Nixon signed it the following month. The law tasks the MDHE with constructing a 42 credit-hour block of classes to be used in all community colleges and public universities in the state of Missouri. The goal of the law — known as Missouri Senate Bill 997 — is to simplify the transfer process for students in the state, especially those transferring from two-year to four-year institutions. The original bill was introduced Feb. 1, 2016 by Senator David Pearce, a Republican from Warrensburg representing Senate District 26 and Senate Education Committee chair, according to the Missouri Senate website. The bill
passed the state Senate with no opposition and the state House of Representatives with little opposition. The law specifies class topics for the curriculum but not specific courses. Bridget Thomas, Truman State University’s director of interdisciplinary studies, represents Truman on the Common Curriculum Advisory Committee — a group composed of faculty from public colleges and universities in Missouri which advises the Coordinating Board for Higher Education as it reviews the curriculum. Thomas said the committee is also working with chief academic officers for two- and fouryear schools. Thomas said the bill specifies a number of areas and competencies that should be included in the curriculum and the committee is using these areas as a starting point. She said a block for transfer purposes already exists within the Code of State Regulations, but the advisory committee has been tasked with revisiting the current block. See CORE, page 3