February 23, 2017

Page 1

Sports

Features

Opinions

German chef Murat Er brings new flavors to Truman’s campus

Trevor Hamblin explains how to give a good apology page 4

Kyle Kanaskie overcomes injury to finish athletic career page 12

page 8

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2017

EXCELLENCE SINCE 1909

THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT-PRODUCED NEWSPAPER

Presidential Search Budget

Consulting Services

$138,777.57

Presidential Search Committee Stakeholder Advisory Committee and Board of Governors

$10,938.59

Staff Writer

Total

On-Campus Constituent Group Meetings with Search Consultant

$157,439.66 Source: Institutional Support Budget, Fiscal Year 2017

$803.23

Administration reveals presidential search budget and benefits to closed process By Rachel Fechter

Truman State University students and faculty read the email updates on the presidential search process which documented the benefits of using R. William Funk and Associates and having a closed presidential search process. The emails also chronicled the progress of the search from reviewing semi-finalists and finalists to eventually naming Sue Thomas as the 17th president of the University. However, many members of the Truman community were possibly unaware of the total cost of the presidential search process, which added up to $157,439.66. This money was used to pay for consulting services such as teleconferences, advertising, travel to interviews, background checks and degree verifications, according to the Truman Institutional Support Budget for Fiscal Year 2017. In addition, this money went toward campus constituent group meetings with the Presidential Search Committee, StakeHolders Committee, and Board of Governors, as well as lodging and meals for the semifinalist and finalist candidates. Dave Rector, Vice President for Administration, Finance and Planning, said this money was set aside shortly after former University President Troy Paino announced his resignation, and it was budgeted in the Institutional

Thomas addresses University By Kira Hintz

$6,920.27

News Text Editor index.newseditor@gmail.com

tmn.truman.edu

Support section of the 2017 fiscal budget. Rector said this money has almost been paid in full except for a small amount of travel expenses from the last couple of weeks, and therefore will not further impact the budget cuts Truman has recently seen. Rector said the money set aside for the presidential search budget was standard in comparison to recent information in the media regarding the costs for presidential searches. Rector said he thinks R. William Funk and Associates’ secure website which preserved applicants’ anonymity, their access to contacts in order to do background checks on candidates and their ability to do ad placement with a mission statement highlighting Truman’s open president position made the closed presidential search process worth it. “If you have a search that was handled this way — where the applicants are protected — then you get a bigger pool of people,” Rector said. “For president, I think this is a good approach. I don’t think you would use it for a dean or someone in admission. President is pretty tricky to get a good pool and get the right person.” Rector said the search process is long and meticulous to ensure the best candidate is selected as president. “I’ve been involved in several presidential searches over the years, and it’s hard work whether you sit through

interviewing people, or you’re on a committee and you have this giant stack of applications, and you have to try and figure out who the best ones are,” Rector said. “I know several of us — after we wrapped up our stakeholder role — chatted briefly before we headed out [and] said, ‘Boy, that was work. And boy we’ve got a lot of responsibility.’ You’re making a recommendation that affects the future of the institution, so you want to say the right thing and think big-picture rather than just your own little area.” Mike LaBeth, Board of Governors chair, said while Thomas was an internal candidate, the closed search process, money spent and time invested were still crucial in the search process. “We wanted to find the best person to lead our University,” LaBeth said. “Dr. Thomas went through the same interview process just like everyone else. We did not go into the search saying, ‘We’re going to hire Sue Thomas’. We all went in with open minds. It was a process. It was unanimously decided that Dr. Thomas was going to be our next president and I don’t think that happens very often. I think that shows we as a board made the right decision because we were all on the same page. At the end [Thomas] stood out. She’s the one we felt would lead our University in the right direction.”

Newly appointed Truman State University President Sue Thomas paid special attention to Truman State’s budget cuts during her state of the University address which gave students and faculty the opportunity to hear about the University’s progress and challenges. To begin the address, Thomas mentioned some of Truman’s achievements. Thomas said Truman was recognized as a top producer of Fulbright students, tied nationally for 6th in the Masters Granting Institution and was also among the top 20 mid-size schools in the nation for producing Peace Corps volunteers. The University also ranked 15th in the nation among all institutions, Thomas said, and first among all in Missouri. While being successful individually, Thomas said Truman has also obtained success through helping the Kirksville community and public schools with language services and support. “Something you may not be aware of [is that] over the past two years Kirksville has experienced an influx of over 100 immigrants from the Democratic Republic of the Congo,” Thomas said. “A positive and professional and productive learning environment for Truman students and for Congolese language learners has been led by faculty members from the Department of Classical and Modern languages and the Department of English.” Thomas said unfortunately, a big problem Truman is tackling at the moment is the various types of financial cuts it has received. Thomas said the University is in fiscal year 2017. She said fiscal years are based upon the year in which they end, not the year in which they start. It’s important to know this, Thomas said, because it was announced in January that the University is undergoing an 8 percent budget withhold. Thomas said this will result in a $3.1 million withhold Truman has to come up with a way to compensate for in the last six months of its school year. See UNIVERSITY ADDRESS page 3

Administration prepares for future following surcharge By Austin Hornbostel

The Truman State University administration was able to cover the recent budget cuts of more than $3 million, thanks in part to a recently implemented surcharge for full-time students. The $50 surcharge covers about 8 percent of these cuts. The remaining 92 percent will be covered by what the University refers to as central money — dollars saved by foregoing updates to University equipment or other one-time costs. The one-time surcharge won’t affect students after the spring 2017 semester, and the University will offer a grant program for students who aren’t readily able to afford an extra $50 mid-semester. University President Sue Thomas said it’s hard for the University to address budget cuts, especially mid-semester, because about 60 percent of the University’s education and general budget is wrapped up in salaries. Thomas said eliminating positions would be impossible, as such action would violate existing employment contracts. Thomas said the central money that will cover the budget costs will prevent the University from making equipment replacements and updates for the time being. Specifically, she said Pickler Memorial Library is due for a fire alarm system replacement that will need to be delayed. About 200 desktop computers will have to go without upgrades for the time being as well, and seven to 10 of the cars in the University fleet have eclipsed 170,000 miles of travel but will have to remain in use. Thomas said some of these central funds also originate from what is re-

ferred to as lapsing salary — for example, this type of money can come from a faculty member retiring midacademic year and the University hiring a temporary replacement just to teach the classes retiring faculty once taught. Thomas said the difference between what the University would pay a full time faculty member and what it would pay a part time instructor is what constitutes lapsing funds. Beyond these areas, Thomas said the University was unable to find any other areas to save money without cutting into operating budgets and impacting University departments. She said this was when the idea of the surcharge came to fruition. “The question was, rather than decimating a number of operating budgets on campus for the next six months … is there a way that we could do something with the students — that wouldn’t be very much, would not be very significant — but would help to not have to go into all of the operating budgets that are already pretty lean on this campus?” Thomas said. The Board of Governors approved the surcharge at its Feb. 4 meeting, but no announcement was made until Feb. 13, when Thomas sent an email to students. Thomas said one reason for the delay was because she wanted to talk to the student body president and vice president — seniors JJ Dorrell and Christy Crouse — and Student Government first. Because Student Government meetings take place Sunday nights, Thomas said the timing between meeting with Dorrell and Crouse and getting a chance to talk to the Senate led to the announcement taking more time. Thomas said the delay was also in part because the administration

VOLUME 108

tmn.truman.edu

Editor-In-Chief index.editor@gmail.com

ISSUE 17

wanted to put the process in place for students to get help through the grant program. Money for these grants is coming out of the Foundation budget. “I don’t consider it to be a delay, but I understand some do,” Thomas said. “It was enormously important to me that Student Government was involved and informed about this ahead of time.” Thomas said getting feedback about the surcharge from the student body before implementing it would have been a difficult task because students likely wouldn’t have shown much approval for paying more money. She said the same thing goes for those affected by a lack of replacement for the older vehicles in Truman’s fleet because having to make cuts or ask for more money is generally not met with approval. Thomas said there was a quick turnaround between the budget cuts and when the University had to make decisions regarding how to address them. Thomas said as a result, Student Government is reportedly putting together a way to educate students about the University budget and how it is tackling issues like the surcharge. “I am beyond willing to get all students’ input, but how do we educate them so that they can actually provide good input?” Thomas said. “Because without the education, without the explanation, how are people able to decide whether it’s something they really want to do or not, as opposed to just an immediate reaction of ‘Of course I don’t want to pay an extra $50?’” Looking forward, Dave Rector, Vice President for Administration, Finance and Planning, said the University could face more than $4 million in cuts for the next fiscal year.

www.facebook.com/TrumanMediaNetwork

Rector said when institutions know there are cuts coming, they generally either start to save for the next year ahead of time or go ahead with some necessary purchases while the University still has the money. In this case, Rector said Truman has been cutting back now in preparation for the year ahead. Rector said one place where Truman has a lot of money is in positions. He said there are currently eight positions the University is holding open instead of filling, where former employees have resigned or left Truman. He said these positions range from Physical Plant workers to a position on the admissions staff — the administration doesn’t plan to leave these positions unfilled forever, just in the short-term to save money. Rector said as far as cuts to staff go, the University is hoping these only occur naturally — turnover as result of the employee’s decision to move on, not as a result of a University decision. “I’ve been in this position for over 20 years, so I’ve been through this several times,” Rector said. “There’s lots of different ways you can approach it, but what we’ve always tried to do is to try to be as compassionate as possible.” Rector said Truman is also looking at ways that it can share staff across campus more. He said managing faculty when faced with budget cuts is more difficult, because Truman hires on an academic year basis. As a result, there isn’t a similar mid-year turnover like what the University might see with its staff. See SURCHARGE page 6

@TrumanMediaNet

© 2017


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.