Rain 49/46
THE TUFTS DAILY
TUFTSDAILY.COM
Monday, April 4, 2011
VOLUME LXI, NUMBER 40
Where You Read It First Est. 1980
New group leaks confidential Tufts financial information online by
Mick B. Krever
Daily Editorial Board
courtesy David Schildmeier
Tufts Medical Center nurses picketed last month over ongoing contract negotiations that center around the hospital’s staffing procedure.
Nursing contract negotiations continue by
Laina Piera
Daily Editorial Board
A protracted dispute between the Tufts Medical Center and the union representing its nurses continues amid talk of an impending nurses strike. Following changes to the hospital’s staffing pattern undertaken in early 2010, which strained tensions between Tufts Medical and its nursing staff, the hospital has offered a one-year contract extension to members of the Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA), the professional association and union supporting Tufts’ 1,200 nurses. Negotiations, which began in November of last year, are still ongoing, and public statements from both sides indicate the two sides are still at odds in advance of the current contract’s expiration date of April 11. Negotiators will meet again tomorrow and then again next Monday, but the future of negotiations beyond that point is unclear. Tufts Medical has proposed a one-year extension of the current contract that also includes changes such as a 3-percent raise for all nurses and has offered to maintain current health and pension benefits. The offer also includes proposals to hire additional nurses who would be available on a moment’s notice to fill shortterm staffing needs, add charge nurses that serve solely as a clinical resource and limit the use of overtime and temporary reassignments of nurses. “We have received very good feedback on the offer from our nurses and we understand that many of them would like the opportunity to accept this proposal,” Julie Jette, director of
media relations and publications at Tufts Medical, told the Daily in an email. The hospital’s proposal, however, does not set a concrete limit to the number of patients assigned per nurse, which an MNA representative called the main issue at stake in the negotiations. “[Tufts Medical Center has] said they can not consider our proposal because they can never set a firm limit that would have to be held to on how many patients a nurse takes care of,” David Schildmeier, director of public communications for the MNA, said. The hospital changed its staffing pattern in January 2010, resulting in a savings of $34 per patient per day, which Schildmeier said put economic concerns over those of patients. “They’re cutting millions of dollars of care,” Schildmeier said. “It’s totally an economic interest. ‘Let’s cut the cost of care to patients, the money we spend taking care of them, so that we can profit more money for ourselves.’” Jette said the hospital, a nonprofit institution, insisted that the changes were undertaken in order to improve the institution’s financial standing, not for profit’s sake. “We do not have shareholders who derive earnings from our revenue,” Jette said. “Whatever margin we generate — if any — is invested back into the hospital. In order to invest in the vital equipment we need to save lives and to improve quality, we must generate some margin to reinvest.” Jette said the MNA’s proposed nurse-to-patient ratios see NURSES, page 2
A group of current and former Tufts students identifying themselves as “Jumboleaks” on Saturday posted online an outdated list of university financial holdings, citing financial transparency and responsible investment among their motivations. The list, posted to the website Jumboleaks.org, comprises 35 companies ranging from CVS Caremark to Monsanto, a provider of agricultural products that has often been linked to controversial business practices. According to senior Will Ramsdell, a representative of Jumboleaks, the list presents a snapshot of Tufts’ direct holdings from sometime in 2010. Ramsdell said that to the best of Jumboleaks’ knowledge, the list presents the university’s direct holdings in their entirety for the time period it represents. Tufts has long maintained that its policy of keeping its financial holdings secret is crucial to the success of its endowment. Ramsdell declined to identify the source of the document. Director of Public Relations Kim Thurler would not comment on the authenticity of the
document. She did, however, tell the Daily in an email that the university does not currently hold any direct investments. This would mean that the Jumboleaks document is wholly outdated. Ramsdell rejected the significance of this fact. “I don’t really think that that’s relevant to the issue here,” he said. “The 2010 list is still a valid representation of what the Tufts endowment represents.” The initial Saturday post on Jumboleaks.org did not identify the list as specifically reflecting information from 2010, nor did it acknowledge that the information was no longer current. Remsdell acknowledged that Jumboleaks had prior knowledge of both of these things. The organization updated its website late Sunday evening to reflect this information. Jumboleaks approached the Daily in mid-February about releasing the content of the leak. The Daily declined to run a story at the time because the significance of the information the list brought to light did not seem to outweigh the university’s desire for investment secrecy. The editors elected to cover the story today only after Jumboleaks independently published the
financial document online.
A new player In his interview with the Daily, Ramsdell was opaque about the makeup of Jumboleaks. He said that the organization consists of Tufts students and people whom he believed to be Tufts graduates. Ramsdell described the organization as a group of likeminded individuals who were drawn together by a common interest when the document surfaced. “The organization formed around the existence of the leak itself,” he said. He said there was no hierarchy within the organization and that he had volunteered as spokesman largely because he was not fearful of legal repercussions. “I’m one of the people in the organization who’s willing to come forward and use my name,” he said. Jumboleaks did not consult the university about the accuracy of the list before posting it online, Ramsdell said, explaining that the organization feared repercussions. The organization vetted the see JUMBOLEAKS, page 2
mct
The Roots, pictured above, will be the main performance at this year’s Spring Fling concert.
Roots, RJD2 to perform at Spring Fling concert Hip-hop/neosoul group The Roots will headline this year’s Spring Fling concert, Concert Board announced at the annual Battle of the Bands contest on Saturday. DJ and instrumentalist RJD2, who creates and produces a mix of hip-hop and electronic music, will also play. The choice for Spring Fling acts is a matter of balancing costs with wide appeal, Concert Board co-Chair Kelsey Schur, a junior, said. “A lot of times it comes down to who’s available,” Schur said, adding that she was satisfied with the result of the process. “I’m extremely happy, I’m so proud of this,” Schur said. The bands will appeal to a wide range of students, she added. “They worked out on so many fronts that it was just an obvious choice for us,” Schur said. “RJD2 is … probably not as well-known as The Roots; that’s often the case with the artist that comes out before the headliner.” Two student bands, the American Symphony of Seoul and Explicit, earned a performance spot at
Inside this issue
Spring Fling alongside the two professional acts, according to Schur. “I think [what we’re looking forward to the most] is just the opportunity to perform in front of our friends and perform before The Roots and get the chance to meet them,” Explicit vocalist Rashad Davis, a sophomore, said. Davis said the group’s style was undefined but that at Battle of the Bands they played music ranging from funk to rock. The Roots played Spring Fling in 2004. “We don’t repeat within the same four years, but past that it’s fine,” Schur said. The board finalized the process of securing The Roots in February and chose RJD2 to complement them. “I’m very happy with how things are turning out,” Schur said. For more on The Roots and RJD2, see Arts, page 5. —by Martha Shanahan
Today’s sections
What is responsible for the recent resurgence of the ’90s?
“Merchant of Venice” meets Wall Street in a refreshing rendition
see FEATURES, page 3
see ARTS, page 5
News Features Arts | Living Editorial | Letters
1 3 5 8
Op-Ed Comics Classifieds Sports
9 10 13 Back