THE TUFTS DAILY
Sunny 62/40
VOLUME LXII, NUMBER 41
Where You Read It First Est. 1980 TUFTSDAILY.COM
Monday, November 7, 2011
Rutgers Professor, to speak today, comments on importance of Iowa caucuses by
Kathryn Olson
Daily Editorial Board
Professor of Political Science and Director for the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University David Redlawsk will discuss his new book, “Why Iowa?: How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process,” today at 12 p.m. in Barnum Hall 008. The Daily spoke with Redlawsk last week to discuss the role of the Iowa caucuses in American politics and the 2012 Republican presidential primaries.
Kathryn Olson: In your book, “Why Iowa?”, you claim that had the New Hampshire primary taken place before the Iowa caucuses in the 2008 election, [Secretary of State] Hilary Clinton may have won the election instead of [President] Barack Obama. Can you explain the importance of the Iowa caucuses in electing America’s first black president? David Redlawsk: We opened the book with this counterfactual. Actually, if Iowa hadn’t happened at all, the election would have been really different, and the reason for that is that Iowa gave Barack Obama an opportunity to a build strong grassroots organization. He used Iowa as a way to test this and you have to remember that in late 2006 and early 2007, Obama was well behind in the polls, but Clinton had a really strong advantage ... Had there been no Iowa, we speculate that Obama would not have been able to get the kind of traction he got because of the need to build grassroots operation in Iowa which served him well for the rest of the nomination and the general election campaign. KO: Is the importance of the Iowa caucuses a result of the ability of candidates to build this kind of momentum, or is it more a result of the media spectacle that surrounds it? DR: It’s a bit of both. The most important point is that the Iowa caucuses come first in a sequential system. Over time, candidates can take key states, which sends information to later voters. The decisions made at an early stage have an
effect on later voters. But it doesn’t have an effect without media involvement. What we find in the research is that why Iowa really matters is because the media can shift to whatever candidate does better than expected. This was the case for Obama. Iowa created a sense that he had a real chance. It’s about Iowa being first, about Iowa being a caucus and the media shift that results after failed or raised expectations. KO: Can you explain why the dynamics of a caucus differ from that of a primary? DR: In a caucus, you have to motivate voters to come out at a certain time and to spend two hours talking politics. It’s harder to get them to do that, and it takes a lot more personal contact. Candidates have to be accessible in Iowa. They have to go to town halls, to people’s houses, to diners. In later primaries, you can’t do that. You really have to do most communication on television. Candidates can become sucked into a bubble. They’re surrounded by people that agree with them and become disconnected with voters. Iowa forces them to go out and talk to voters. Candidates learn a lot about interacting with people. If all they did were television appearances, they would never interact with voters. KO: If candidates lose in Iowa, what disadvantages do they have to work against compared to the winners, and how can they recover from such a setback? DR: Iowa is characterized by a large pool of candidates going in and a small number coming out. The ones who really fail to get any attention drop out fairly quickly. For the most part, candidates who get no traction in Iowa have a difficult time recovering. It’s also possible that you can barely win in Iowa, but the media hypes up the victory. For example, a 10 percent margin of victory isn’t very good but if the media is able to talk about you, it can work to your advantage. But if you’re in the bottom half, you’re not going any further. KO: What are your expectations for this see CAUCUSES, page 2
Josh Berlinger/Tufts Daily
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton yesterday called for the country to create ‘a strong economy and a good government working together.’
Clinton encourages optimism, creativity to solve global problems by
Elizabeth McKay
Daily Editorial Board
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton last night challenged the Tufts community to consider how they can meet the challenges of an interconnected world during the 10th Issam M. Fares Lecture. The 42nd president addressed a crowd of around 6,000 Tufts students, faculty, staff and guests during the lecture sponsored by the Fares Center for Eastern Mediterranean Studies. Clinton, highlighting his experience combating the spread of HIV/AIDS through the Clinton Health Access Initiative, encouraged members of the audience to ask themselves how they can each work to solve pressing global problems like climate change and economic inequality. Clinton, also the U.N. special envoy to Haiti, called the question of global interdependence
Lizz Grainger
Daily Staff Writer
Virginia Bledsoe/Tufts Daily
Inside this issue
see CLINTON, page 2
Massachusetts ranked most energy-efficient state in the US by
Tufts fraternity Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT) and sorority Alpha Omicron Pi last week went doorto-door in Tufts’ neighboring communities to ask for charitable donations on behalf of the Somerville Homeless Coalition’s Project SOUP. The groups collected approximately 300 non-perishable food items, according to sophomore ZBT Vice President and Philanthropy Chair Mitch Mosk.
the fundamental question of the 21st century. “If we do live in an interconnected world where all the world’s borders look more like nets than walls, are going to keep trying to fill in the nets to make them look like walls, or are we going to strive to build a world we can share?” he asked the audience. He added that the responsibility of answering this question will fall to the students of today. “The students here and your generation will have to make a decision, live with it, vote by it and work for it, about what kind of world you want, whether you really want the world of shared prosperity, shared opportunities, shared responsibilities and shared sense of community,” he said. “If you do want that kind of world you have to ask a simple question: how do I get it?” he added.
Massachusetts last month was ranked the most energy-efficient state in the country by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), due in large part to recent state energy policies. The ACEEE is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting energy efficiency as a means of increasing economic prosperity, and the council each year ranks states’ energy efficiency in six different policy areas through its State Energy Efficiency Scorecard, according to ACEEE Policy Analyst Michael Sciortino. Massachusetts scored a total of 45.5 points out of a possible 50, rising three points since 2010 and surpassing former front-runner California. The Green Communities Act, passed in Massachusetts in 2008, improved the energy efficiency in several categories, especially in the field of the utility and public benefits programs and policies, which counts for 40 percent of
a state’s total ACEEE score, according to Sciortino, who served as one of the authors of the Scorecard. The act aims to invest $2.2 billion in energy-efficient initiatives between 2010 and 2012 and is expected to save approximately 2.5 percent of Massachusetts’ electricity sales, according to Sciortino. “Clearly the biggest impact of the Green Communities Act was in the utilities sector, and I think what the act did was make the utilities of Massachusetts leaders in saving energy,” Sciortino said. Massachusetts scored 18.5 out of 20 points in the utility and public benefits programs and policies category, according to the ACEEE website. Massachusetts uses its public benefits fund for programs that conserve energy in buildings and businesses by statewide utilities companies like NSTAR and National Grid, according to Sciortino. “In Massachusetts we have legissee ENERGY, page 2
Today’s sections
TUPD and local police work to maintain a balanced relationship.
The Daily takes a look at 3Ps’ new production, “reasons to be pretty.”
see FEATURES, page 3
see ARTS, page 5
News Features Arts & Living Editorial | Letters
1 3 5 8
Op-Ed Comics Classifieds Sports
9 10 15 Back