No condom condemnation here: CARE promotes practices of safe sex see FEATURES / PAGE 4
WOMEN’S CROSS COUNTRY
Cool Runnings: Women’s XC ices out competition
‘The Accountant’ doesn’t quite add up see ARTS & LIVING / PAGE 6
SEE SPORTS / BACK PAGE
THE
INDEPENDENT
STUDENT
N E W S PA P E R
OF
TUFTS
UNIVERSITY
E S T. 1 9 8 0
T HE T UFTS DAILY
VOLUME LXXII, NUMBER 27
tuftsdaily.com
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
MEDFORD/SOMERVILLE, MASS.
David Gregory moderates journalist panel on election cycle by Gil Jacobson News Editor
Tisch College Professor of the Practice David Gregory moderated a panel entitled “A Year Like No Other: Politics & the Press in 2016,” featuring New York Times Political Co r re s p o n d e n t Pa t r i c k Healy (LA ’93), NPR Political Reporter Asma Khalid and Mic! Co-founder Jake Horowitz. The event took place last night in Granoff Music Center’s Distler Auditorium as part of Tisch College’s Distinguished Speaker Series. During a roundtable with student journalists before the event, Gregory commented on the New York Times’ strategy of bullet pointing its news for millennials who may avoid reading full articles, despite an increased demand for specificity in coverage from that same age group. “There is shorter attention but there is greater interest in explanation and exploration on the part of audiences,” he said.
MAX LALANNE / THE TUFTS DAILY
New York Times journalist Patrick Healy (LA ‘93) speaks in the “A Year Like No Other: Politics & the Press in 2016” panel discussion in Distler Hall on Oct. 17. He also emphasized that the media now focuses more on the mechanics of politics
rather than voter background, and because the media has grown more partisan over
time, people are increasingly turning to it in search of specific perspectives.
“This is where news coverage and commentary become conflated and becomes consumed by people who want to validate their view of the world,” Gregory said. Horowitz also discussed the perilous impact of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s initial ability to create and share his perspectives on the world with people who already shared similar opinions, and how those perspectives then seemed to become their reality. “The filter bubble is very real,” Horowitz said. “You end up getting news from your friends and that can often be very, very at odds with what are the actual facts.” Dean of Tisch College Alan Solomont then opened the panel with an introduction and several expressions of thanks before turning it over to the moderator and panelists. Gregory began by commenting on the evolving role of media in this year’s presidential race. see ELECTION, page 2
State Senator Pat Jehlen discusses Question 2 by Daniel Caron
Contributing Writer
Massachusetts State Senator Pat Jehlen met with a group of about 25 students in Paige Hall Terrace Room yesterday at 6 p.m. for a discussion about the long term-effects of charter schools and why she believes voters should vote against the Massachusetts Authorization of Additional Charter Schools and Charter School Expansion Initiative, also known as Question 2, on the Massachusetts State ballot on Nov. 8. Sophomore Nate Krinsky, president of Tufts Progressive Alliance, introduced Jehlen at the beginning of the event, which was sponsored by Tufts Progressive Alliance, Tufts Democrats and JumboVote. Jehlen’s talk centered around four reasons she thought students should vote down Question 2, which proposes raising the maximum number of charter school expansions per year and removing limits on money allocated to them from district schools. “Right now, there’s a limit on how much district school funding can go
Please recycle this newspaper
Partly Cloudy 80 / 64
/thetuftsdaily
to charter schools,” she said. “A ‘Yes’ on Question 2 would eliminate those limits, and we will have a growing set of selective, privately managed schools.” According to Jehlen, the proposal will take more money from district schools. “Charter and district schools are funded from the same pot of money,” she said. Jehlen explained that when charter school proponents say that charter schools actually increase the total amount of money allocated to the Department of Education, they are referring to a five-year reimbursement formula that should return 225 percent of the lost funds to district schools; however, this formula has not been fully funded in recent years. “Unfortunately, it’s a shock absorber, not a win for all,” she said. Jehlen listed examples of lost funding in Massachusetts district schools that led to programs being cut. These included Snowden International School, which had to cut its Japanese program, see JEHLEN, page 2
For breaking news, our content archive and exclusive content, visit tuftsdaily.com @tuftsdaily
tuftsdaily
tuftsdaily
ZACH SEBEK / THE TUFTS DAILY
State Senator Pat Jehlen speaks to Tufts students regarding the upcoming election and the vote on Question 2 regarding the potential increase in charter schools.
Contact Us P.O. Box 53018, Medford, MA 02155 617 627 3090 FAX 617 627 3910 daily@tuftsdaily.com
NEWS............................................1 FEATURES.................................4 ARTS & LIVING.......................6
COMICS.......................................8 OPINION.....................................9 SPORTS............................ BACK