TuftsDaily10.07.13

Evening Showers 77/55

THE TUFTS DAILY

VOLUME LXVI, NUMBER 22

Where You Read It First Est. 1980 TUFTSDAILY.COM

Monday, october 7, 2013

Students to celebrate Coming Out Day with rally by

Daniel Gottfried

Daily Editorial Board

Tufts Queer Straight Alliance (QSA) will host a rally in celebration of National Coming Out Day this Wednesday at noon on the lower patio of the Mayer Campus Center.

The rally will provide a chance for students and faculty to share their stories and experiences about coming out in a public setting, according to QSA President Bruce Bausk.

“It is a day to have affirmation of your identity and to show support and solidarity for members of the LGBT community,” Bausk, a sophomore, said.

The rally is divided into a segment with speakers invited by QSA and an open microphone segment for all students to share their stories, according to Director of the LGBT Center Tom Bourdon.

“For me the meaning is to show what a vibrant and active LGBT and queer community we have on campus and how many allies we have that are willing to come and show support and speak up for the LGBT community,” Bourdon said.

“For some people it is also a chance to publicly say who they are, which can be scary but also very empowering at the same time.”

Bourdon suspects that few students will take the rally as an opportunity to come out for the first time, but instead it will be another phase in their coming out.

“It is probably a small percentage of

people that are coming out for the first time ever, but for many it is their first time saying it into a microphone in front of a large group of people, many of whom they don’t know,” Bourdon said. “I think that queer people are constantly having to out themselves. Every day you might have to do so. It isn’t like once you are out, you are out.”

QSA has reached out to many parts of the Tufts community in an effort to show support from all aspects of campus life, Bausk said.

“We invited members of the Tufts community who have either expressed that they are out or have spoken at the rally in the past,” he said. “We also reached out to the Group of Six due to the importance of inclusion, representation and solidarity among the many diverse communities here at Tufts.”

QSA will be distributing 400 rainbow flag pins in advance of the event for members of the community to wear as they have done in years past, according to Bausk.

“This is always a great sign of support on campus that goes towards helping people feel comfortable,” he said. “QSA is trying to make the National Coming Out Day a safer space where anyone and everyone can feel welcome, accepted and included.”

In preparation for the event, QSA will hold a discussion about coming out at its weekly meeting on Monday at 9 p.m. in see RALLY, page 2

TCU Senate update Members of the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate last night delivered addresses on the overall statuses of their committees during the body’s third meeting of the year.

TCU President Joe Thibodeau, a senior, began by presenting the Fall 2013 State of TCU, outlining projects such as the establishment of a sexual assault task force on campus. He also announced the Senate’s intention of working with organizations like Programming Board to increase the number of “hallmark events” during a student’s time at Tufts.

TCU Treasurer Adam Kochman, a sophomore, followed with the State of the Treasury Address. He said that the Allocations Board would distribute $1,606,287.16 to student activities and organizations over the course of the fiscal year. Kochman also announced the Treasury’s two major financial projects for the year: allowing campus groups to get reimbursed for public transportation fees and introducing a van shuttle service on campus.

The Senate allocated $602.60 to the Media Advocacy Board for more up-to-date computers and other lab equipment, $1,140 to the Crafts Center to turn Lewis Hall into a haunted house on Halloween and $11,750 for a “Magic: the Gathering” event for students interested in the popular trading card game.

Junior Darien Headen, the Diversity and Community Affairs (DCA) Officer, then spoke on the value of diversity

amongst the student body, explaining how to combat on-campus incidents such as racial insensitivity and student fear of discrimination.

“We need to have space on this campus to talk about these issues,” he said. “[They] should not be swept under the rug.”

The Senate held an open forum to address the draft report issued by the Council on Diversity. The report is an assessment of the council’s ongoing progress in working with diversity-related issues, including how to best achieve a feeling of safety and inclusion for race-based organizations on campus. The final version of this report is expected to appear in November.

Although several members of the Senate expressed concerns regarding the efficacy and implementation of the report and its goals, Headen defended their importance.

“We are trying to look at diversity in a very holistic way, considering how it influences so many areas of campus,” he said.

The meeting concluded with the announcement of three newly recognized student groups: the Robotic Sail Team, the Vagina Monologues and Generation Citizen.

—by Josh Weiner

Inside this issue

Kyra Sturgill / The Tufts Daily

Students are invited to partake in the Zero Waste Challenge as part of The Office of Sustainability’s initiative to raise awareness about the amount of trash people can generate in a week.

Zero Waste week to promote eco-awareness by

Annabelle Roberts

Daily Editorial Board

The Office of Sustainability (OOS) will this week hold the second schoolwide Zero Waste Challenge, inviting students to collect, carry and display all non-recyclable or non-compostable trash they generate in a clear Ziploc bag.

The challenge, which will last from Oct. 9 to Oct. 16, is meant to encourage participants to be mindful of the waste they produce on a daily basis, according to Sustainability Program Director Tina Woolston.

“The goal is not to have you produce no trash, but to have you examine what

you throw away each day,” she said.

For those interested in participating, Eco-Reps will distribute kits on Monday and Tuesday in the Mayer Campus Center, Woolston said. The kits include a clear Ziploc bag with enclosed instructions, a clip for attaching the bag to one’s belongings and a pin to indicate participation.

“We give people a Ziploc bag because we have found that, in general, so much of the stuff that we do use on this campus is recyclable or compostable,” Woolston said.

OOS Communications Specialist Fannie Koa believes the challenge is see WASTE, page 2

Latino Center to celebrate 20th anniversary by

Elissa Ladwig

Daily Editorial Board

The Latino Center will this Saturday commemorate its 20th anniversary in the Aidekman Art Gallery and the 51 Winthrop Street Function Hall.

The anniversary will emphasize the importance of having a Latino presence on campus, according to Latino Center Director Rub謠Salinas Stern.

“I think that it shows that the Latinos are here to stay,” he said. “There was a time when I felt that Latino students were invisible on campus, and I think that we still deal with that, but that has changed a great deal.”

Yareliz Diaz, secretary of the Association of Latin American Students (ALAS), explained that the celebration will also give students a chance to learn more about the Latino Center. “[Stern] is going to speak for a little bit to talk about the last 20 years and what the art exhibit is supposed to show ... so people can mingle and get a sense of what the Center has done in the last

20 years,” Diaz, a junior, said.

Festivities will begin at noon with a brunch in the Aidekman Art Gallery, which will feature a picture timeline exhibit of the history of the Center, Stern said. The celebration will continue that evening with a gala at the 51 Winthrop Street Function Hall, where students and alumni can enjoy dinner, dance to a live band and view student group performances and speeches from alumni.

“It’s going to be a big event; I’m very excited to see old and new faces,” senior Astrid Fuentes, president of ALAS, said.

According to Stern, one of the speakers will be Carlos Cedeño (LA ’95), who played a critical role in creating the Center and La Casa and served as president of the Hispanic American Society during his time at Tufts. Also speaking are Director of Latin American Studies Nina Gerassi-Navarro and leaders of the Latino Alumni Association, Valerie Avila and Shioban Torres. There will also be see ANNIVERSARY, page 2

Today’s sections

Two candidates propelled forward in the race for Boston mayor.

Outstanding talent and writing marks the legacy that ‘Breaking Bad’ leaves behind.

see FEATURES, page 3

see ARTS, page 5

News Features Arts & Living Editorial | Op-Ed

1 3 5 8

Op-Ed Comics Classifieds Sports

9 10 11 Back

The Tufts Daily

2

News

Monday, October 7, 2013

Visiting the Hill this week TUESDAY “Tufts Speaker Series Presents: Jay Joshi” Details: Recent Tufts grad Jay Joshi (LA’ 12) will speak about his success in the financial world. Former president of the Tufts Financial Group, Joshi is now an associate at 3K Limited Partnership, an institutional investment firm based in Boston.

When and Where: 9:00 p.m.; Cabot Auditorium Sponsor: Tufts Financial Group

WEDNESDAY “For Profit, Non-profit or New Profit: Perspectives on Blending Social Innovation & Enterprise” Details: Tripp Jones, managing director of New Profit Inc., will speak about his career.

Students must RSVP and arrive in business casual dress.

When and Where: 12:30 p.m.; Mugar Hall Room 200 Sponsors: Institute for Business in the Global Context

“The Way We Wait Now: Reflections on the Ambiguous Gift of Time” Details: Andrea Kr, the U.S. cultural correspondent for the Swiss newspaper Neue Zr Zeitung, will speak.

When and Where: 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Fung House Sponsors: Center for the Humanities at Tufts (CHAT) FRIDAY “Francisco Mela’s Cuban Safari” Details: Francisco Mela, a jazz drummer

from New York City, will perform at Tufts.

He will present his newest project and band, Cuban Safari, which is formed from a combination of the bands which inspired Mela to become a drummer.

When and Where: 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; Distler Performance Hall, Granoff Music Center Sponsor: Granoff Music Fund, Tufts Music Department —compiled by Daniel Bottino

Celebration to honor presence of Latinos on campus ANNIVERSARY

continued from page 1

performances from Center alumni, S-Factor and La Salsa.

The Latino community on campus has evolved since the Center was founded, according to Stern.

“We started in the late 1980s getting Latino students [at Tufts],” he said. “There were no resources for them ... The only student organization we had was called the Latin American Society, but they really catered to international Latin American students. Students who grew up in the States tried to be part of it, but they never felt that they were accepted in the group.”

Stern said that at first, the Center consisted of only one office on Talbot Street, where he worked part time. Three years after the Center’s formation, the community pressured the upper administration to expand the Center, which was eventually established at its current location on College Avenue.

Although Stern said that Tufts’ Latino community has grown stronger over the years, he believes that there is room for improvement in the way Latinos are perceived.

“On one hand, you have this international-ism of Tufts, but I think it neglects the domestic,” Stern said. “People will more likely go to El Salvador than the El Salvadoran community in Somerville.”

He said that students of all colors should become more involved with race relations on campus.

“All these centers aren’t just for the constituents,” Stern said. “It is often white students

Courtesy Justin McCallum

Student dance group La Salsa, along with S-Factor, will perform at the Latino Center’s 20th anniversary celebration this Saturday in the 51 Winthrop Street Function Hall. that are the most isolated or segregated. The myth is that it is students of color who selfsegregate, but it is actually the opposite. There is no requirement or accountability or necessity for [white students] to engage.”

Both Fuentes and Diaz echoed Stern’s desire to see more non-Latino students at the various ethnic centers around campus, especially in the Latino Center.

“I think I’d just like to say that the centers are not only

for Latino students,” Diaz said.

“We really like to have all different kinds of people in here, we like to hang out, we like to learn from each other.”

Fuentes noted that exploring the Center should be an important component of all students’

lives on campus.

“I think that is the spirit of being a Jumbo and being a Tufts student ... venturing into a new space and going outside your comfort zone and starting friendships and community,” she said.

Students to participate in Zero Waste week WASTE

continued from page 1

Kyra Sturgill / The Tufts Daily

This Wednesday at noon, the Tufts Queer Straight Alliance (QSA) will hold a rally to celebrate National Coming Out Day.

Rally on Wednesday RALLY

continued from page 1

the Sophia Gordon Multipurpose Room, according to Bausk.

The rally is open to anyone that would like to attend, Bausk added.

“The Coming Out Day Rally will focus primarily on coming out within the LGBTQ community, but of course all are welcome to celebrate whatever ‘coming out’ means to you on this day,” he said.

an effective way to promote sustainable habits within the Tufts community.

“All of a sudden, everything that you pick up you have to be aware of where it goes,” she said. “Otherwise, it goes into a bag that you have to carry around for a week ... It makes you realize that it is actually not that hard to recycle and compost on a daily basis, especially when you live on a campus that has all of these streams set up for you already.”

The week will culminate with “Jumbo Mountains,” an event displaying the trash produced by 200 uphill residents compared to the waste generated by Zero Waste Challenge participants, Woolston said.

The trash will be piled on the Academic Quad for an hourlong event at which apple cider and donuts will be served.

Although only 40 people returned the Ziploc bags in time for the event last year, Woolston said she hopes about 200 students will participate this time around.

“Then we can have a pile

that shows when people are really conscious of the trash that they are generating and disposing of, and one for what happens when they aren’t,” she said.

Eco-Rep Co-Coordinator Katie Segal believes Jumbo Mountains is a powerful display of the difference that ecoconscious behavior can have on the accumulation of waste.

“I think its pretty effective because it’s a visual,” Segal, a senior, said. “Some people don’t respond to numbers. But this is one week, your dorm, [and] you get to see all the trash that came out of it, and you realize that every little thing makes a difference.”

The OOS was also only able to collect two days’ worth of trash from dorms for the Jumbo Mountains presentation, Woolston said.

“The students generated so much trash in the residential halls that they couldn’t leave a week’s worth in the dumpster,” she said.

According to Woolston, the event began in 2009 as a challenge for students enrolled in an Experimental College class

titled Environmental Action: Shifting from Saying to Doing.

Eco-Reps took up the challenge in 2010, but it was not until last year that the Eco-Reps opened up the challenge to the rest of the Tufts community.

“All the Eco-Reps are responsible for trying to get other Tufts community members to participate,” Segal said. “We said each Eco-Rep should pass out 15 bags.”

Hosting the event at Tufts is important because students are developing lifestyle habits that they will continue for the rest of their lives, Koa said.

“Whether you live in a dorm or you live out in an apartment on your own, you are setting up your own personal behavior,” she said. “It’s so important for you guys to start picking up these habits and hopefully carrying them with you after you leave Tufts.”

Koa has completed the challenge twice, but she still learns from the event every year.

“It changes the way that you see waste,” she said. “You will find that you learn a lot about yourself while you are doing the challenge.”

Features

3

tuftsdaily.com

Boston mayoral race brings change, boasts two strong candidates by

Lex Erath | Sugar and Spice

Nine Circles of Tufts, Part One

Charlotte Gilliland Daily Editorial Board

The federal government may be locked in standstill, but Boston politics press on.

The mayoral election on Nov. 5 will determine the successor of long-serving Boston mayor Thomas Menino. After the Sept. 24 preliminary election, the choices have been narrowed down to City Councilor John R. Connolly (D) and State Rep. Martin J. Walsh (D), who received 18 percent of votes to Connolly’s 17 percent. The two advance over 10 other candidates.

Serving as mayor of Boston since 1993, Menino made the decision not to run for an unprecedented sixth term in 2013 due to personal health problems. Described by the New York Times as a “workhorse,” Menino is Boston’s longest serving mayor and has met around 50 percent of Boston residents, according to a 2013 poll. Thomas Menino was the only non-Irish American candidate to be elected since 1930, but Walsh and Connolly’s success in the primary guarantees that Boston will again have a male IrishAmerican mayor.

“This has to be regarded by many as a disappointment,” Paul Watanabe, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts Boston told the New York Times. “The ‘new Boston’ is based on the fact that this has become a majority-minority city.”

After receiving a high approval rating for many of his terms, demonstrated by an 82 percent approval rating in July 2012, Menino’s decision has opened the door for a wide range of mayoral candidates.

Elimination Process The 12 original candidates consisted of five black candidates, a Latino candidate and six white candidates. One of the 12 was a woman. This diversity in choice of candidates represented the diversity of Boston residents, where 53 percent are members of a minority group. The candidates covered a variety of issues, including jobs, education and the economy.

Despite some citizens’ hopes that the election would bring a landmark win in diversity for African-American candidate Charlotte Golar Richie (D), who came in third behind

I

MCT

Boston Mayor Menino has decided not to run for reelection this Nov. 5, and City Councilor Connolly and State Rep. Walsh will face off at the first debate on Oct. 15.

Walsh and Connolly, the primary resulted in two white, male, Irish-American candidates in their 40s as the main competitors.

Connolly Connolly, who grew up in Roslindale and was endorsed by the Boston Herald, is a member of Boston City Council, a former teacher and Boston Public School parent, according to his campaign website. His campaign has focused on education.

“He is running for Mayor to transform our public schools, to bring a more inclusive, open culture to City Hall, and to usher in a new era of innovation across the City of Boston that puts us in the lead when it comes to creating safe, healthy and livable neighborhoods,” the website said.

After obtaining his B.A. in government from Harvard University and then his J.D.

Campus Comment

from Boston College Law School, Connolly has worked as a teacher in New York City schools and as an attorney with community-based organizations, such as Action for Boston Community Development and the PrideLights Foundation, a South End-based gay rights organization.

According to his campaign website, while on the city council he worked to improve the educational experience for children. Specifically, he focused on the dropout rate, the geographical spread of high quality schools and increased face time with teachers.

Residents in Boston ranked education as the biggest problem in Boston, according to a MassINC poll conducted in September, which distinguished him from the 11 other see ELECTION, page 4

What does the government shutdown mean to you?

“I think it’s absurd that it’s gotten to this point. The Republican philosophy is that the government doesn’t work, and they fulfill that philosophy by breaking the government.”

—Jeremy Goldman, junior “I’m really frustrated with the way the mainstream media is presenting it as a two-way street, when it’s really a small subset of Republicans in the House who have hijacked the process.”

—Megan Clark, senior “What truly bothers me about the government shutdown is the simple inability to compromise. Our government is designed so that differences of opinion can be talked through. Both House Republicans and Democrats knew that the fiscal deadline was Oct. 1, so to have a last minute action that is this drastic is very immature. Eight hundred thousand people have now been deemed ‘not essential’ because of the one percent’s inability to talk through the issues. I hope that both parties realize soon that people’s jobs hang in the balance.”

—Greer Clem, sophomore “I think that the Tea Party’s selfishness resembles that of a crying toddler, and it’s unfortunate that thousands of government employees are suffering while those holding the government hostage continue to get paid throughout this.”

—Ramiro Sarabia, freshman “I think it will last another 10 days or so ... I am personally affected. My mom works at a public university in Montana that receives a lot of grant money that has been furloughed.”

—Carter Wilkinson, sophomore “It’s unfathomable that both sides are so stubborn about keeping a party division that they’d rather fight at the expense of people who need government funding than give in and compromise.”

—Natalie Kobsa-Mark, sophomore

“I think that it’s sad that as a result of bipartisan politics, the general public has to suffer. Although it hasn’t affected me personally yet, I think that it’s something that as citizens we should be aware of and should use as a talking point to criticize the current system and its flaws.”

—Nicola Pardy, senior “I feel very distant from it, actually. I see news articles and Twitter feeds all over, but I feel it’s not really affecting me. So I’m almost indifferent, but at the same time, it’s very scary because it’s something you don’t expect to happen, even though it’s happening right now.”

—Takuma Koide, senior “It’s very upsetting. The system of governance can’t function if one side is hell-bent on circumventing it. If the Republicans want to repeal or change the Affordable Care Act when they have votes in Congress to do so, then so be it. But since they don’t, it smacks of sore loser-dom to take these drastic measures and harm so many people who rely on the government in the process ... I certainly hope it ends soon, because the longer this goes on, it will only serve to lessen the public’s already low level of trust in government — which of course is exactly what conservatives are hoping for ... This level of dysfunction is unacceptable and bad, even for this Congress — which is saying something.”

—Brian Rose, junior “This affects my family — my mom works for the government, in housing and development, and she’s furloughed right now. It’s impacting her work life and it just seems to be getting worse year by year. It seems like the shutdown is going to last as long as the Republicans can hold out for.”

—Johnny Wu, senior

’m going to go ahead and assume that the vast majority of you have at least heard of, if not read, Dante’s “Inferno,” the first part of his epic poem “Divine Comedy.” For the clueless, the totally uncultured and those who live under a rock, the Inferno is basically a division of hell into nine different circles where souls are sent to various awful torments in accordance with their specific crimes.

While Dante’s breakdown is justly famous, it’s a little outdated and not at all applicable to life here at Tufts. And so, without further ado, I present to you Lex’s Inferno, the Nine Circles of Tufts.

1. Limbo. This isn’t really a punishment; it’s just an afterlife existence for those who really didn’t do anything wrong but were never admitted to Tufts. This includes prefrosh, tour groups and townies, and they spend the afterlife floating around Tufts in search of an unnamed destination, always failing because the Somerville/Medford split throws off their iPhones.

2. The Glacier-Like. There are few things more irritating in this world than a massive blob of freshmen oozing along, taking up the entire sidewalk, when you’ve got a problem set to hand in by 4:00 p.m. or have class in two minutes. The Glacier-Like also includes those who take more than 10 seconds to decide what additional granola bar they’d like from Hodgdon and the wannabe-chefs who spend upwards of 10 minutes delicately smearing their peanut butter/cream cheese/condiment of choice while everyone else waits impatiently. These students are condemned to an eternity of watching a technologically-challenged professor attempt to set up a projector.

3. The Sleep Thieves. To a college student, there is nothing — nothing! — more precious than sleep. And that is why there is an entire circle of the underworld dedicated to the Sleep Thieves. They are a varied group, including drunken roommates who reappear in the wee hours of the morning, jetlagged foreigners who watch “New Girl” on full volume in the middle of the night and whoever the heck authorized construction outside Latin Way every weekday starting at 7:00 a.m. These fiends are doomed to an unending series of allnighters in Tisch.

4. The Redshirts. For those who don’t know, in college sports (at the D1 level), it is a common practice to recruit an exceptional high school senior and then bench him completely for his freshman year. This allows the player to stay on at school for a fifth year while still following the league rule of only playing for four years. This fifth year is known as the player’s “redshirt” year.

Here at Tufts, the term “redshirt” applies to a kid who really shouldn’t be in your class, but is anyway and flaunts his superior knowledge. Examples include that boy in your German 0001 class who’s clearly taken at least three years of high school German, or that girl in your introductory economics class who passed the AP Econ exam with flying colors. The Redshirts can often be found sniggering at your terrible pronunciation (hey, you’re trying!) or loudly discussing the easiness of the test that everyone just failed. They’re some of the most annoying people you will ever have the misfortunate to encounter, but you can take solace in the knowledge that they will be spending the afterlife struggling through an advanced chemical engineering final as liberal arts majors.

And here we pause our descent into hell, at least for this week. Check back next time to join me in exploring the lower half of hell, and if you think you fall into one of the circles I’ve discussed above, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Lex Erath is a sophomore who has not yet declared a major. She can be reached at Alexandra.Erath@tufts.edu.

The Tufts Daily

4

Features

Taste of Tufts: Hescott shares computer science research on genetics

by Julia

McDaniel

Daily Editorial Board

Last Friday, Assistant Professor of Computer Science Benjamin Hescott presented his research in computational biology at this year’s first Taste of Tufts lecture.

Taste of Tufts, a lecture series hosted by the Experimental College, invites professors or administrators to present their own work and gives students the opportunity to learn about research that may lie outside their major.

Hescott has done research in computational complexity, approximation algorithms and Kolmogorov complexity. He presented his research analyzing the relationship between protein interactions in Friday’s lecture, entitled “Finding the Max Cut of the Genetic Interaction Graph in Yeast Finds Compensatory Pathways.”

“What I mean by compensatory pathway is we’re actually looking at life’s backup system,” Hescott said. “Just like data inside your computer, your body has backup systems in place. So if something goes wrong, genetically speaking, there are other genes that can go in and do the work.”

This backup system Hescott refers to is the system of protein-protein interaction (PPI) in our genetic system that ensures our bodies continue to function if one or two genes at a time are not working properly.

“What this whole thing is about is interactions between proteins. What the protein and protein do is physically bind together,” he said. “One relationship is called synthetic lethal, which means that if one gene of the pair is suppressed so it does not encode proteins as it is supposed to, another gene comes in and does the job for it, so the organism is fine.”

If both of those genes are suppressed, the organism dies, according to Hescott.

“The other type of interaction is called

synthetic rescue, which is the opposite,” he said. “If one or the other is suppressed, the organism gets sick. But if both are suppressed together, the organism is completely fine.”

Hescott described how his team of computer scientists represented this complex system of PPIs with a simple metaphor.

“We can think of interactions just like Facebook,” Hescott said. “We consider proteins to ‘friend’ themselves with other proteins, and represent this information in a similar way to a social network of some sort. The ‘friendship’ between the two is the physical interaction between proteins.”

According to Hescott, research labs in Canada and California were able to find out how likely it was for a yeast organism to survive when genes were suppressed in pairs. Hescott said his team then took the data for every such relationship in yeast genes and used a computational algorithm to find patterns in this network of genes. To figure out which relationships were “lethal” versus “rescue,” Hescott used a local search technique in what is called a bipartite graph to randomly split the genes up. The algorithm then went through and compared each gene.

“We take a set of genes and flip a coin, heads or tails, to randomly partition the genes to separate them into two sides,” he said. “I focus on one gene at a time and analyze its relationship with every other gene in the whole system.”

Though the initial partition of the genes into these two categories is random, his algorithm sorted through the genes by comparing how “lethal” or “rescue” each gene’s relationship with every other gene was. Because assignment to each side was random, the algorithm also accounted for changes in assignment when matchups did not fit certain criteria.

Hescott said his research team was the fourth to perform this type of data analysis on protein relationships, but noted that they were the first to use this particu-

Courtesy Justin McCallum

Assistant Professor of Computer Science Ben Hescott spoke at the Taste of Tufts series presented by the Experimental College last week. lar algorithm. Past studies have ignored data from synthetic rescue interactions, he said.

The team’s ability to map out which gene pairs were lethal or rescue has many important applications, Hescott said. The genetic code of humans, which is similar to that of yeast, cannot be analyzed this way, since the experiment used the death of the organism to verify the type of interaction. If scientists were able to map out the PPIs in a human body, however, important treatments for humans, like those for cancer, could be tailored to work with that information.

Hescott explained that solving these problems is difficult because the vast amount of data makes absolute preci-

sion infeasible.

“These problems are not solvable by a computer in a reasonable amount of time,” he said. “If the data’s big enough, the sun will burn out before the computer can solve the problem. We’re going to use an algorithm that doesn’t work perfectly.”

Computer scientists often need to use approximate algorithms to leverage mistakes and discover new things, Hescott explained.

“What a computer scientist does when he or she hits a wall with feasibility, they try to find a way to approximate,” he said. “Or we take one problem and recycle its solution for something else.

We decide we’re going to do the best that we can.”

Connolly and Walsh to face off in four debates ELECTION

continuedfrom page 3

candidates, giving him his second-place success in the primary with 17 percent of the vote.

Walsh Walsh, who received just over one percentage point more than Connolly, has served as representative of the 13th Suffolk district in the Massachusetts House of Representative since 1997. Walsh received his B.A. in social science from Boston College.

“In the House, Marty has established himself as a leader on creating and protecting jobs and growing the economy,” his campaign website said.

Walsh also claims to be a champion of civil rights. Raised by Irish immigrant parents in Dorchester, Walsh has always been surrounded by politics, the labor movement and community engagement work. With his focus on labors and unions, WBUR has labeled him the “labor guy.”

Walsh, now living with partner Lorrie Higgins and their daughter in Dorchester, has been open about his past. At age seven, he was diagnosed with Burkitt’s lymphoma, a form of childhood cancer, and has made a miraculous recovery. He has also remained open about his past drinking problem: After struggling with alcohol and attending a detox facility in Cape Cod, he had his last drink on April 23, 1995. Two years later, he successfully won a special election for a vacant seat in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.

The two remaining candidates’ campaigns clash On Sept. 26, controversy arose when Connolly called on Walsh to pledge to limit external funding for campaigns in order to curb the influence of special interest groups in the election. Walsh, however, who receives large contributions from labor unions, did not support Connolly’s suggestions. Connolly’s suggested pledge, according to Walsh, allows for a huge loophole with paid canvassers.

Both candidates agreed, though, that they

would prefer a campaign that focuses only on the issues. Despite the government shutdown, Connolly and Walsh are not slowing down on the campaign trail. According to Masslive.com, Connolly demonstrated his focus on the community and is “not giving the shutdown much thought.”

One policy issue that Connolly is focusing on is the contracts of Boston Police patrolmen, and he claims he will vote it down as the proposed pay hike would endanger Boston’s financial future.

“It would damage the city’s long-term fiscal health, and it would set a dangerous precedent for all future labor negotiations in the city,” Connolly told the Boston Globe.

Walsh, on the other side, hopes to respect basic tenets of collective bargaining. Menino has urged City Council to vote the proposal down as well, as the total pay rise would be about 25.4 percent.

With regards to other issues, Walsh expressed concern on the economic effects of the government shutdown on the city of Boston. “[The Boston Housing Authority] have, I believe, 22 million dollars less than last year from the federal government, and whenever something like that happens the city and/or the state have to pick up the shortfall,” Walsh told Masslive.com.

Although Walsh and Connolly appear dedicated and qualified to serve as mayor of Boston, candidate Charlotte Golar Richie announced that she would not pursue a write-in campaign for mayor and likely will not choose to endorse a candidate. Some remain disappointed in the missed opportunities of diversity this election could have brought.

“One of the tests of the ‘new Boston’ is not only in the numbers, but in whether the political leadership, the face of that leadership, can match that diversity,” Watanabe said.

The two candidates originally agreed to meet each other in three televised debates, but last week decided to host a fourth, to focus on issues of diversity. The first of the debate series will be Oct. 15.

Arts & Living

5

tuftsdaily.com

TV Review

Ryan Buell | This Week in Hip-Hop

Riff Raff’s ‘Ignorant Brilliance’

H

Gage Skimore via Wikimedia Commons

Bryan Cranston’s masterful portrayal of Walter White is one of the legacies ‘Breaking Bad’ leaves behind.

An empire crumbles, but a legacy remains by

Alex Hanno

Senior Staff Writer

Warning: This article discusses major plot points and contains spoilers from the series finale of “Breaking Bad.” “Breaking Bad” came to an end a week ago, and since then the world has been chattering in its wake. Unfortunately, there is very little left to say.

Truthfully, what can you add to a conversation about a television series that has already managed to express itself in the deftest of manners, again and again? Well, considering there is only one Vince Gilligan, the showrunner and source of genius behind AMC’s “Breaking Bad” (2008-2013), probably nothing.

Nonetheless, there are currently about a thousand blogs, Variety articles and BuzzFeed top 20 lists attempting

to celebrate one of the best shows in television history. “Breaking Bad” gave its viewers hour after hour of brilliant, compulsive and intelligent entertainment, and for that, it only seems fitting that fans try to pay it reverence.

Just on the heels of its first, albeit longdeserved, Emmy victory for Outstanding Drama Series, Gilligan brought viewers a series finale that boasted recordbreaking ratings. To put things into perspective, the finale’s viewership nearly doubled from the penultimate episode and had ratings almost five times higher than that of the prior season closer.

Gilligan himself has acknowledged Netflix’s contribution to this massive surge — the streaming service has allowed newcomers to binge-watch the series and gain ground — but really, it comes down to the sheer quality of the show. Through word of mouth, fans

and critics alike have been applauding “Breaking Bad” for years now, and as the series drew to a close, murmurs of positive praise escalated to a deafening din. As a result, an unthinkable number of viewers flocked to catch up before the finale aired.

Now, whether you jumped on last week, or you have been one of the loyal few who watched from the start, the ending of “Breaking Bad” is sure to have stirred up a number of powerful sentiments in everyone. But, there is one theme that surely remains universal at the end of it all.

Change.

An innocent, 50-year-old Walter White (Bryan Cranston) summed it up in the series’ pilot: “[ You] see, technically, chemistry is the study of matter, see BREAKING, page 6

Gallery Review

Other exhibits overshadow ‘Holland on Paper’ by

Elza Lambergs

Contributing Writer

With its exemplary but small collection of Art Nouveau pieces, the exhibit “Holland on Paper: The Age of Art Nouveau” has the challenge of living up to other impressive and similar showcases at the Museum of Fine Arts (MFA).

The exhibition, which opened on Aug. 10, is currently on view in the Frances Vrachos Gallery, the same space that was just occupied by “Art in the Street,” a collection of 20th century European posters, earlier this summer. The MFA also hosted another compilation of Art Nouveau pieces in “The Postcard Age,” which was on view through this past April. Though the new installation’s expressive and decadent illustrations are engaging, it ultimately pales in the aftermath of these two predecessors.

The Art Nouveau movement originated in Paris around the turn of the 20th century. Literally meaning “new art,” Art Nouveau soon spread throughout Europe and beyond the continent. At the crux of the movement was a desire to connect with the natural world; pieces are filled with organic forms and smooth curves. Art Nouveau was all-encompassing, influencing not only the graphic arts, but also architecture, textiles, decorative arts and more. Some

Thot 1 via Wikimedia Commons

see HOLLAND, page 6

Drawings by famed artist Piet Mondrian are on display in ‘Holland on Paper.’

ip-hop often gets a bad ‘rap’ (pardon the pun) for its apparent ignorance and promotion of materialism, violence and misogyny. From his unique facial hair and the grills on his teeth to the ignorance spouted from his mouth and the sparsely clad models in his music videos, Riff Raff would seem to be a confirmation of hiphop’s worst stereotypes. Or at least, that’s how it appears on the surface. See, the thing is, Riff Raff doesn’t actually take himself seriously. He is surprisingly self-aware and is even capable of light satire. To fully understand Riff Raff, we have to look at two very distinct trends in hip-hop today.

The first is the mainstream trend of extreme extravagance and braggadocio — what I’ll call the “Rick Ross phenomenon.”

Hip-hop has long involved the glamorization of wealth and partying — from its beginnings, hip-hop has been a celebration of rising to a better socioeconomic situation. While that theme certainly still exists today, much of mainstream hip-hop (by which I mean music made specifically with intentions of garnering radio play) has isolated the excess and materialism, making it the sole focus of the music.

That’s how you end up with a former corrections officer rapping about selling drugs, eating lobster bisque and flying in a G5. And it’s not hard to see the appeal — it’s fun to listen to Rick Ross. The sheer extravagance of his music makes the listener feel like they, too, “woke up in a new Bugatti.” No one has ever complained about listening to Ross when they’re partying in the club — and that’s the point.

Yet it’s impossible to separate that view of Ross from his fictitious, narcissistic facade.

In the end, he isn’t what he claims to be — but the money he makes from saying he is helps him actually live that lifestyle.

In response to this mainstream trend, a sub-current has emerged within hiphop satirizing this Rick Ross style of music. The rise of irony-fueled media — a product of the so-called ‘hipster’ movement — has given rise to Lil B. Frankly, Lil B is a horrid rapper, with a bad flow and even worse lyrics. Despite this, he has accrued a large, loyal fan base. Fulfilling our culture’s need for irony, Lil B relies on being horrible to be successful. He breaks swag rap down to its core elements and then presents them without the sonic appeal of mainstream hip-hop. Every lyric is a common brag taken to its utmost extreme (see: “Swag to the maximum / Swag 100 thousand / 100 trillion”). Lil B’s music is more than terrible trap rap: it’s full of satire.

He exaggerates the “Rick Ross phenomenon” in order to expose the music for its true absurdity.

So, where does this leave Riff Raff? He takes himself more seriously than Lil B and is more suited for the club scene. He relies on many of the same motifs as Rick Ross but also pokes fun at them. Take the recent hit music video, “Dolce & Gabana” (pronounced ‘Dole-See and Gabana’), in which Riff Raff insists that he “Only f**ks with hoes that rock Dolce & Gabana.”

In many ways, the song isn’t much different from what we hear on the radio and see on TV: an infectious beat, models dancing, an obsession with designer clothing. But a music video that features the rapper crawling on the floor between models’ legs, dressing intermittently as a gorilla and, at one point, feeding a woman Brussels sprouts leaves viewers no doubt that he knows how absurd he appears.

That’s the brilliance of Riff Raff. He is able to combine the entertaining excesses of Rick Ross with the self-awareness of Lil B, allowing him to live egregiously while also making a fool of himself.

Ryan Buell is a sophomore who has not yet declared a major. He can be reached at Ryan.Buell@tufts.edu.

6

The Tufts Daily

arts

Monday, October 7, 2013

As ‘Breaking Bad’ concludes, series cements itself in television history BREAKING

continued from page 5

but I prefer to see it as the study of change ... But that’s all of life right? It’s the constant, it’s the cycle. It’s solution, dissolution. Just over and over and over. It is growth, then decay, then transformation!”

When it comes to “Breaking Bad,” nothing could be more accurate. The series has continually focused on this idea of transformation, over time turning heroes into villains and misguided criminals into sources of empathy. What’s more, the writers have never been afraid to reverse such changes.

Yet, three weeks ago, this trend looked as if it had come to a halt. Most fans were familiar with Gilligan’s desire to transform his main character from a skittish and polite chemistry teacher into a devious and cunning meth drug lord, but the concept of “change” seemed to stop there. Walt, or rather, his alter ego Heisenberg, venomously spat in the face of his former partner, Jesse (Aaron Paul), before proceeding to tell him that he watched the boy’s girlfriend die. In that moment, no one could have believed White would transform back again. At that moment, it appeared as if his journey had ended in decay.

Things are never simple in the world of “Breaking Bad,” however. It takes giant magnets to destroy evidence-ridden computers and the purchase of grubby car washes to launder any real amount of drug money. Thus, in a mere two episodes, everything viewers believed was turned on its head.

First, Walt was torn down, humbled and made to be a feeble, cancer-afflicted man, willing to pay $10,000 just to converse with someone for an hour. Despite the countless murders he committed, both just and unjust, at that instant, one couldn’t help but empathize with the man withered by the fireside.

But breaking Walt was not enough.

After everything he had been through, for better or worse, he ultimately did not deserve to die on a note of pity, nor

djtomdog via Flickr Creative Commons

The efforts of series creator Vince Gilligan and leads Bryan Cranston and Aaron Paul were essential to the success of ‘Breaking Bad.’ would he allow himself to. And so, he changes yet again. Finding his courage wrapped up somewhere within his enormous pride, Walt leaves his snowy prison and heads home to set things straight for good.

In the pilot, Walt states that he is “awake,” and in the beginning, he really was. His intentions were good and everything he did, he did for his family. But a slow decline into villainy sullied his clear vision, and it was only in the finale, upon his return to Albuquerque, that White seems to awaken once more. For the first time in two years, he is honest with himself — and, most importantly, with his wife, Skyler (Anna Gunn).

“I did it for me,” he explains. “I liked it.

I was good at it. And I was really ... I was alive.” With this slight bit of untainted truth, White subtly admits his failures and is miraculously humanized again.

The audience is able not only to support him in his final plot for revenge, but even

MFA exhibit showcases Dutch Art Nouveau pieces HOLLAND

continued from page 5

of the more well-known artists of the movement include Gustav Klimt and Alphonse Mucha.

“Holland on Paper: The Age of Art Nouveau” features various graphic design pieces by Dutch artists. The arrangement of the 45 works includes pieces from more prominent artists like Piet Mondrian, while also bringing to light obscure names like Jan Toorop, Samuel Jessurun de Mesquita and Theo Hoytema. The collection chooses to highlight pieces of one particular medium: paper. From watercolors and drawings, to calendars, illustrated books, posters and lithographs, the art style flows seamlessly from one piece to the next.

Despite offering viewers an authentic taste of the time period, the physical layout of the exhibit hampers its effectiveness. Situated in a tight hallway, the display is adjacent to a room filled with extremely valuable oil on canvas works by several artistic giants like Pablo Picasso and Joan Miró. This makes the space highly trafficked; instead of being a destination itself, “Holland on Paper” becomes a means of getting to these other renowned works. Because of the large number of passersby, it is incredibly difficult to truly engage with the pieces.

Furthermore, the exhibit’s commentary is limited. The introductory plaque gives a basic overview of Art Nouveau, but among the works, only every other piece has an extended description. After traveling through the gallery, there is another large plaque that you would expect to offer closing remarks on the exhibit. It is, however, only a replica of the first, meant to guide those who view the exhibit in reverse order. The collection is clearly meant to be a small compilation of pieces, which is unfortunate; with better textual support for viewers,

Elza Lambergs for the Tufts Daily

The MFA’s ‘Holland on Paper’ exhibit is a vast array of Art Nouveau pieces created on paper. it could have the potential to be more educational.

“The Postcard Age,” which assembled postcards from around the world, including many from the Art Nouveau era, was an exhibit of another caliber. It was large and guided visitors through in a more logical manner. “Art in the Street,” which was on view in the same hallway as “Holland on Paper,” was another representation of Art Nouveau pieces that was arranged in a more appealing way. The large poster works on display in “Art in the Street” were much more visually arresting and seemed to fit the hallway space, where they appropriately appeared on view as if a visitor were walking along a street. With such memorable displays immediately preceding it, “Holland on Paper: The Age of Art Nouveau” seems merely to cower in the shadow of these exhibits.

manages to root for him.

As Badfinger’s “Baby Blue” (1971) plays softly in the background of the final scene, Walt grins as he lies down in the belly of the meth lab. At long last, Heisenberg is at peace — and so are we.

The success of this central motif, and the show as a whole, is owed to a combination of writing and acting talent.

Without the scribes behind this series mustering up neat and realistic scripts week after week for the actors to embody so wholly, “Breaking Bad” would have fallen by the wayside long ago. Yet, Gilligan and his team of writers have consistently focused on scientific accuracy, calling attention to detail and most importantly, words — never failing to produce 99.1% pure material.

Some of the best lines from this show are a mere three or four words, but the manners in which the actors delivered them gave these short phrases an amazing amount of authority. And while nearly half the cast has either

won or been nominated for an Emmy (and deservedly so), it is Cranston who led this show from the forefront, and Cranston who stunned audiences again and again with his exceptional portrayal of Walter White.

“It’s over when I say it’s over.”

“Say my name.”

“I won.”

No one who has watched “Breaking Bad” will ever forget these epic words or what they meant in the moment. Nor will they forget the wonderfully acted, broken figures of Jesse, Skyler, Hank and Mike.

So too will the smallest of objects continue to hold the strongest of connotations for true fans. When words were unnecessary, symbols said it all. Now, a box cutter will never look the same. A porkpie hat will instill fear for decades to come. The eyes of pink, plush stuffed bears will never stop judging.

Even though Walter White and his meth empire have fallen, this is not the end of “Breaking Bad.” Just as Mr. White explains to his class — life revolves around change. The show itself may be out of episodes, but its influence will continue to permeate television, for it has built itself a legacy almost impossible to forget.

Not to mention, in a year or so, Bob Odenkirk will be amusing audiences across the country as shifty lawyer Saul Goodman once more in his new series, “Better Call Saul.” Viewers can only hope it measures up to half of what its predecessor once was.

There is no doubt that from now on, new dramas will aspire to be the next “Breaking Bad.” Villains will continually be compared to Heisenberg and Gustavo Fring and years from now, a new generation will stream “that famous, old TV series,” whether for pleasure or just to learn how television should be made. It is not easy parting with a series that rewarded its viewers so fully, but knowing that there is no need to really say goodbye might make things a bit easier.

Monday, October 7, 2013

The Tufts Daily

advertisement

7

The Tufts Daily

8

THE TUFTS DAILY Hannah R. Fingerhut Editor-in-Chief

Editorial Jenna Buckle Melissa Wang Managing Editors Abigail Feldman Executive News Editor Daniel Gottfried News Editors Victoria Leistman Menghan Liu Melissa Mandelbaum Annabelle Roberts Mahpari Sotoudeh Josh Weiner Sarah Zheng Daniel Bottino Assistant News Editors Alexa Horwitz Hunter Ryan Denali Tietjen

Shannon Vavra Executive Features Editor Lily Sieradzki Features Editors Charlotte Gilliland Emily Bartlett Vicky Rathsmill Caitlin McClure Assistant Features Editors Sabrina McMillin Julia McDaniel Caroline Welch Executive Arts Editor Dan O’Leary Arts Editors Veronica Little Drew Robertson Assistant Arts Editors Brendan Donohue Lancy Downs Grace Hoyt

editorial | op-ed

Monday, October 7, 2013

Editorial

Transgender student housing a worthwhile project Last week, the Tufts Community Union Senate voted unanimously in favor of the continued reexamination of Tufts’ policies related to transgender students, specifically regarding living arrangements. The resolution aims to ensure that transgender students feel comfortable and included on the Hill and that the university is appropriately addressing their needs and desires.

The resolution focuses on numerous issues that transgender students, especially first years, have historically had to deal with when applying for housing. Although transgender students beyond their first year are not actively restricted from living where they want to, gender-neutral housing is limited to Bush Hall, one Latin Way 10-person suite and one Hillsides 10-person suite.

According to the resolution, “Bush Hall is historically one of the least popular dormitories on campus.” This means that transgender students seeking gender-neutral housing are left with only 20 “desirable” spaces.

Considering that transgender students who want to live in genderneutral housing have to arrange a special meeting with the Office of Residential Life and Learning and are not necessarily guaranteed genderneutral housing if a roommate switches rooms, it is clear that changes in policy are necessary. There is no reason that anyone should have to jump through housing hurdles to end up in a space where they feel comfortable, especially for those students beginning freshman year.

The university has come a long way in increasing diversity and making all students feel welcome on campus over the past few years. For instance, Health Service last semester expanded the student healthcare plan to include benefits for transgender students, making Tufts the 37th school in the nation to do so. Since then, other schools have followed suit and have even asked Tufts’ LGBT community for advice on how to go about expanding coverage.

This resolution is likely a sign of more changes to come in accommodating all students on campus and creating a better community for learning.

This positive step forward will hopefully be one of many until all students feel included and have equal opportunities for success on the Hill.

Jehan Madhani

Alexander Schroeder Executive Sports Editor Marcus Budline Sports Editors Aaron Leibowitz David McIntyre Zachey Kliger Jake Indursky Claire Sleigh Kate Klots Matthew Berger Tyler Maher Assistant Sports Editors Ross Dember Jason Schneiderman Alex Connors Elayne Stecher Bhushan Deshpande Tom Chalmers Matthew Crane Nick Golden Jehan Madhani Keran Chen Denise Amisial Benjamin Boventer Scott Geldzahler Drew Lewis

Executive Op-Ed Editor Op-Ed Editors

Cartoonists

Editorialists

Kyra Sturgill Executive Photo Editor Caroline Geiling Photo Editors John Hampson Wan Jing Lee Simone Backer Nick Pfosi Staff Photographers Zhuangchen Zhou Courtney Chiu Sofia Adams Alexander Kaufman Executive New Media Editor Oliver Porter Phuong Ta Jake Hellman New Media Editor Barton Liang Assistant New Media Editor

Off the Hill | Columbia University

Delayed gratification

PRODUCTION Elliot Philips

Production Director Emily Rourke Adrian Lo Emma Arnesty-Good Jen Betts Shoshanna Kahne Daniel MacDonald Montana Miller Falcon Reese Reid Spagna Andrew Stephens Chelsea Stevens Maura McQuade

Executive Layout Editor Senior Layout Editor Layout Editors

Assistant Layout Editor

Jamie Hoagland Executive Copy Editors Julia Russell Emma Arnesty-Good Copy Editors Anna Haugen Adrienne Lange Drew Lewis Annaick Miller Vidya Srinivasan Marina Shtyrkov Hadley Gibson Assistant Copy Editors Patrick Schulman Rachel Salzberg Tori Porter

Hamid Mansoor Executive Online Editor

BUSINESS Daphne Wu Executive Business Director Li Liang Receivables Manager P.O. Box 53018, Medford, MA 02155 617 627 3090 FAX 617 627 3910 daily@tuftsdaily.com

by

Brooke Robbins

Columbia Daily Spectator

When I tell people that I’m in a relationship, I usually receive one of two reactions. There is the blunt disapproval — which has taken shape in such outbursts as, “Why would you come to college with a boyfriend?” or, “Oh, well I don’t believe in long-distance relationships.” Or, my personal favorite, the “I-just-visited-theslaughterhouse” look of distaste topped off with an eerily unaffected “Oh.” There is also the masked disapproval — the sad attempt at a smile plastered onto an all-too-telling expression of mock enthusiasm, given away by a pair of flitting eyes and very desperate attempts to change the topic of discussion. Rarely have I encountered a genuinely positive response to this fact — this confession, I suppose — of commitment.

Throughout the tail end of senior year and upon arriving at college, I was faced with a kaleidoscope of judgmental faces and backhanded comments, and so by the second week or so of school, I’d become pretty used to it. I no longer got offended by the grimaces. I didn’t try to explain myself. But I must admit that I become aware of, wedged into my conscience, a pinprick of embarrassment — a hidden “tendency,” not to lie about my relationship status, per se, but just not to bring it up. Trying to make another understand intellectually what I feel from a place that is far from logical had proved to be a futile effort. So rather than deal with pejorative looks and condescending responses, I learned to tuck this piece

The Tufts Daily is a nonprofit, independent newspaper, published Monday through Friday during the academic year, and distributed free to the Tufts community. EDITORIAL POLICY Editorials represent the position of The Tufts Daily. Individual editors are not necessarily responsible for, or in agreement with, the policies and editorials of The Tufts Daily. The content of letters, advertisements, signed columns, cartoons and graphics does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Tufts Daily editorial board.

of me away — as if it were some dirty little secret.

In truth, Ben is the least shameful bit about me. A photograph of him sitting in his white-and-gold Navy uniform hangs from the wall in my dorm room. The way in which he lives his life inspires me to be the best version of myself. So why do I feel so ashamed to talk about him?

And besides, what ever happened to the good old fashioned long-term relationship? Have such values as commitment and patience dissipated? When did being in a long-distance relationship become so unacceptable?

Perhaps we can blame it on the generational gap. In this world of instant communication, the concept of delayed gratification has become foreign, in more ways than one. Rather than waiting for the sake of preserving a steady relationship, high school and college students today participate in a noncommittal hookup culture. It is no coincidence that the generation that learned the patience of handwritten letters and the overwhelming gratification of receiving a letter after waiting on the postal service also marked its approval on long-distance relationships, while the generation that relies on moment-to-moment contact via email and text messages does not. But if you have ever kept a correspondence via “snail mail,” you will know how much more satisfying it is to open up that envelope and indulge in its contents, after having to wait — God forbid, a couple of days — to receive it.

For those that missed the snail mail era, imagine instead a jar of Nutella.

It has always been delicious. But now imagine that you were on a diet and had not tasted Nutella in three months.

Suddenly, that cocoa-hazelnut flavor that you’ve always loved takes on an entirely new, almost fantastical quality.

When your diet is over, and at last you taste that spoonful of bliss, this Nutella spread — somehow, though you’ve had it millions of times before — has never tasted so good.

Long-distance relationships, in my experience, have much the same effect.

People often argue that holding onto a long-distance relationship is limiting, because, who knows — maybe my actual soulmate is waiting for me at college, and being “taken” is short-circuiting this opportunity. I will be the first to say that there is no universal “right answer” to the question of long-distance relationships. But I will also then say that it is a bit unfair to judge “long-distance relationships” as a single, homogenous entity, rather than on a case-by-case basis. In the end, if a relationship is worth saving, then when the two do come together again, they will experience something much like our Nutellaloving dieter: The time spent together will taste infinitely sweeter. So to those who ask why a girl would come to college with a boyfriend, I pose a counterquestion: Why would I settle for an average jar of Nutella if I could wait and get an endless supply of that betterthan-ever-before brand? I argue that choosing long distance is a matter of delayed gratification, and of knowing a prize when you’ve got it.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Letters must be submitted by 2 p.m. and should be handed into the Daily office or sent to letters@tuftsdaily.com.

All letters must be word processed and include the writer’s name and telephone number. There is a 450-word limit and letters must be verified.

The editors reserve the right to edit letters for clarity, space and length.

ADVERTISING POLICY All advertising copy is subject to the approval of the Editorin-Chief, Executive Board and Executive Business Director. A publication schedule and rate card are available upon request.

The Tufts Daily

Monday, October 7, 2013

9

Op-Ed

op-ed

Walt Laws-MacDonald | Show Me the Money

Shut it down

Y

justin mccallum / tufts daily archives

Vote yes to divest!

Dan Jubelirer and Miranda Willson

by

Think about how much money you and your parents pay in tuition for a semester at Tufts (or don’t think about it, if it makes you feel sick). If you are a typical first-year student and do not receive financial aid, you are paying approximately $58,780 for this semester.

As socially conscious students, most of us hope that we’re putting all of that money into an institution that cares about our future. Which is why it infuriates me — and hopefully, you too — to know that Tufts invests five percent of its endowment, or approximately 75 million dollars, in the fossil fuels industry. This means that we, as students who attend the school, are indirectly supporting an industry that is destroying our planet. By voting yes to the divestment referendum on Oct. 9, we can let Tufts know that a slightly higher operating budget is not worth environmental catastrophe.

Don’t believe that the climate crisis is that bad? Since the Industrial Revolution, global temperatures have risen 1.53 degrees F. This might seem like very little, but climate scientists warn that any warming greater than 3.6 degrees F may lead to irreversible changes to the climate, the results of which could be catastrophic. In order to stay below 3.6 degrees F, we need to act now. A report released in 2012 by PricewaterhouseCoopers found that even if fossil fuel consumption were to decrease by half, global temperatures might increase 6 degrees C by 2100.

The effects of climate change are being felt right now across the globe. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s most recent assessment report, released last month, global sea levels have rose 7.4 inches from 1901 to 2010, which has been enough to eradicate 1,880 square miles of coastal marshes on the Louisiana coast. Additionally, a 2012 study sponsored by 20 countries found that failure to combat climate change now could lead to 100 mil-

lion deaths worldwide by 2030.

Faced with these unpromising facts, it would be negligent and inhumane not to act now to address climate change, especially when we have the power to do so. By divesting, we are making a conscious decision not to support the fossil fuel industry. If entire cities including San Francisco, Seattle and Portland can divest, why can’t we?

Though the amount of money Tufts invests in fossil fuels is small relative to the wealth of these companies, decontaminating our portfolio would not only serve as an economic function. The five colleges that have already divested from fossil fuels — Sterling College, Green Mountain College, Hampshire College, College of the Atlantic and Unity College — all have relatively small endowments. Tufts’ divestiture would demonstrate the viability of institutional fossil fuel divestment on a larger scale, set a precedent for other colleges to follow and continue our legacy as a leader on environmental issues.

Divestment is an economic tactic that has been effective in the past. In the 1980s, colleges and entire cities divested from companies that supported South African apartheid, which ultimately led to the end of this practice. In the 1990s, similar divestment campaigns targeted at the tobacco industry caused tobacco companies to lose money and power. In the early 2000s, college divestment called for action against the genocide in Darfur. In short, divestment works, and it is doable.

All divestment entails is selling stock Tufts invests in companies that extract fossil fuels and in mutual funds that support them. The Tufts Divestment campaign asks Tufts “to request that all of its fund managers apply a negative screen for the 200 publicly traded companies that hold the vast majority of the world’s carbon reserves.”

Financial experts can apply a negative screen to a fund, which is a policy not to invest in uncertain industries, often for reasons of corporate social responsibility.

Many funds that colleges are invested in, for

instance, already have a negative screen in place to screen out investments in tobacco companies. A similar screen could be put in place for fossil fuels. Negative screens against harmful industries are common practice in socially responsible investing. As an institution dedicated to furthering the human condition, Tufts has a responsibility to be a responsible investor and employ a negative screen against industries which pose a clear and imminent threat to humanity.

It is important to note that divestment will not affect Tufts’ ability to provide financial aid and will not hurt future investments.

Numerous studies confirm this. A study released by the investment management firm Phillips, Hager & North concluded that “socially responsible investing” does not decrease investment returns. An analysis released this past January by the Aperio Group, a socially responsible investmentmanagement firm, found that divesting from fossil-fuel companies does not deduct value from a college’s portfolio, and it adds a negligible risk to investors (a less than 0.001 percent risk increase).

Divestment is a small step towards a greener future, so with this referendum vote, we can register our intent to take on the climate crisis here at Tufts.

Considering the U.S. Government’s failure to pass significant legislation to combat climate change and reduce our fossil fuel consumption, it is up to us as citizens to show that we will not stand for climate injustice. Come Wednesday, we have the power to fix this growing global crisis. We have the power to influence what kind of world we enter when we graduate. We have the power to vote yes.

Dan Jubelirer is a junior who is majoring in peace and justice studies. He can be reached at Dan.Jubelirer@tufts.edu.

Miranda Willson is a freshman who has not yet declared a major. She can be reached at Miranda.Willson@tufts.edu.

Off the Hill | Johns Hopkins University

Religion shouldn’t be a taboo topic

by

The Johns Hopkins News-Letter Editorial Board The Johns Hopkins News-Letter

For many young people, going to college inspires a sense of independence and selfdiscovery. Finally freed from parental control and oversight, students feel compelled to strike out on their own, forge their own identities and form their own opinions. Inherent in this feeling is a growing skepticism of the customs they’ve practiced since they were young and a growing willingness to challenge what their parents have always told them to be true. Nowhere is this more evident than in the tendency for college students to drift away from religion.

Across the country, religious service attendance rates at colleges and universities are decidedly lower than in the population at large, and many students feel indifferent to

the subject in general. This trend has only increased in recent years, and Hopkins is no exception; religious groups on campus are generally tolerated but often ignored. Many students who do have faith choose to keep it to themselves, resulting in a void of public discourse on the issue.

Of course, religion is a deeply personal matter, and the Editorial Board cannot opine on whether these trends are good or bad. We do, however, recognize the sense of community that religious outreach groups can provide and remind students seeking such a support network that Hopkins offers a variety of opportunities for religious involvement on campus. Freshmen coming from religiously vibrant homes may be taken aback by how little the subject is discussed among the student body, and it is important that these students feel welcome to practice their faith if they choose.

Furthermore, the Board encourages students of all viewpoints to feel more comfortable discussing religion on campus. Just as political discourse is furthered by open and robust conversation, we suspect that lifting this unofficial taboo would enhance students’ understanding of alternate religious perspectives. The Hopkins admissions office tries hard to create a diverse campus environment, welcoming students from a wide variety of racial, cultural and ideological backgrounds. They do this because immersion in unfamiliar cultures and customs is a critical component of the undergraduate experience, one which fosters tolerance and intercultural understanding. The vast array of religious viewpoints on campus is just another intriguing element of this diversity, and exploring these differences teaches us not only about others, but about ourselves.

It’d be a shame to waste that opportunity.

ou see? You see, Republicans? This is why we can’t have nice things!”

In the latest hiccup in Congress’s eternal fight for money, the United States government has shut down. Though Congress — barely — got past the debt ceiling and fiscal cliff, they have once again decided that the country’s budget can be used as a bargaining chip. A bargaining chip that costs $3.8 trillion. And people say that the stock market is like gambling...

Obamacare — the eponymous universal healthcare act pushed by President Obama — lies at the heart of this budget fight. The bill, officially the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” in part calls for higher Medicare and insurance taxes on the wealthy to provide government-subsidized health insurance to millions of Americans who currently do not have any insurance.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that Obamacare will cost almost $1.9 trillion over its first ten years, a figure that opponents of the bill love to throw around. Though the CBO predicts Obamacare will actually reduce the deficit, its cost cannot be ignored.

So what happens when you take a bill the President campaigned on, a Democratic Senate, a Republican House, an astonishingly high deficit and a legislative branch that already operates at an excruciatingly slow pace? Gridlocked legislation and padlocked national monuments.

In order for the federal government to maintain normal operations, Congress needed to pass a “continuing resolution” — essentially a temporary budget agreement — before Oct. 1, the first day of the Congressional fiscal year.

The House only passed continuing resolutions that either stripped Obamacare of funding or delayed its launch, but the Senate sent both measures back.

House Republicans — and more specifically, Tea Party Republicans — have ground the federal government to a halt over Obamacare.

Though the fight makes sense — universal healthcare is exactly the sort of “big government” policy they fight against — the fight seems to have finished months ago.

The bill was passed by both the House and the Senate, signed into law, taken to the Supreme Court and deemed constitutional — no thanks to Justice Antonin “Can’t scare me I have life tenure” Scalia. As Jon Stewart put it in his takedown of the shutdown: it’s a f***ing law.

Government shutdowns are one of the “automatic” provisions programmed into the budget fight — sort of like last year’s sequester issue. Shutting down the government is not a typical policy tool — the last shutdown occurred 17 years ago, during the heyday of slap bracelets, Hillary Clinton’s husband and dreamy frosted-tips Justin Timberlake.

Since Oct. 1, the nation’s largest employer has kept millions of its workers at home.

The shutdown hits all services deemed “nonessential,” affecting workers across the country from National Park rangers to doctors tracking influenza at the CDC. Though the shutdown miraculously has some supporters, just about everyone agrees that it is not the way to deal with the problem at hand.

Extremists on both sides of the aisle have made talking about — not even fixing — the problem incredibly hard. The principles of Obamacare are ingrained in the ideologies of both parties in completely opposite ways.

Ironically, Congress will continue to be paid during the shutdown. So that’s good.

The lights will not come back on until Congress is able to pass a new continuing resolution. Until then, everything from the Smithsonian Zoo to workers that process Social Security and Veterans care payments will remain off. In a wry way, the Tea Party has proven its point: our government is huge and incredibly expensive. We’ll see how far proving a point gets them.

Walt Laws-MacDonald is a junior majoring in quantitative economics. He can be reached at Walt.Laws_Macdonald@ tufts.edu.

Op-ed Policy The Op-Ed section of The Tufts Daily, an open forum for campus editorial commentary, is printed Monday through Thursday. The Daily welcomes submissions from all members of the Tufts community; the opinions expressed in the Op-Ed section do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Daily itself. Opinion articles on campus, national and international issues should be 600 to 1,200 words in length. Op-Ed cartoons are also welcomed for the Campus Canvas feature. All material is subject to editorial discretion and is not guaranteed to appear in the Daily. All material should be submitted to oped@tuftsdaily.com no later than noon on the day prior to the desired day of publication; authors must submit their telephone numbers and day-of availability for editing questions. Submissions may not be published elsewhere prior to their appearance in the Daily, including but not limited to other on- and off-campus newspapers, magazines, blogs and online news websites, as well as Facebook. Republishing of the same piece in a different source is permissible as long as the Daily is credited with originally running the article.

The Tufts Daily

10

Comics

Monday, October 7, 2013

Doonesbury

Crossword

by

Garry Trudeau

Non Sequitur

Tuesday’s Solution

Married to the Sea

www.marriedtothesea.com

SUDOKU Level: Seeing “Miley” and “twerk” in the same sentence.

Late Night at the Daily

Thursday’s Solution

Adrian: “Yes, I have enough cash for a few more beers. Life is awesome.”

Want more late-night laughs?

Follow us on Twitter at @LateNiteAtDaily

Please recycle this Daily.

by

Wiley

The Tufts Daily

Monday, October 7, 2013 Wanted Sonny’s Barber Shop. Look Good – Best Haircuts Around! 5 Minutes from TUFTS – 282a Main st.

Medford. MA. See Joe Jr. Walk in’s always Welcome! Highly Skilled Barber at Your Service! Open Tuesday- Saturday (617) 515. 2955

Housing

-

MEDFORD CONDO LARGE CONER UNIT 3BR 2 BATH 2 PARKING MINS 93+128, NEW HEATING+AC, GRAITE, STAINLESS STEEL APP POOL WALKING AN BIKE TRAILS JUST A 15 MIN WALK TO TUFTS FOR APPT. 781 953 3155

11

Sports -

-

-

classifieds policy All Tufts students must submit classifieds in person, prepaid with check, money order or exact cash only.

All classifieds submitted by mail must be accompanied by a check. Classifieds are $15 per week or $4 per day with Tufts ID or $30 per week or $8 per day without. The Tufts Daily is not liable for any damages due to typographical errors or misprintings except the cost of the insertion, which is fully refundable. We reserve the right to refuse to print any classifieds which contain obscenity, are of an overly sexual nature or are used expressly to denigrate a person or group. Questions? Email business@tuftsdaily.com.

Jumbos look to bounce back from consecutive losses at home

Jordan Bean | Sacked

The playoff effect

WOMEN’S SOCCER continued from back

harder than we had [been].”

Freshman forward Jess Capone had a chance to give Tufts the lead at 67 minutes when she collected the ball at the box off of a free kick and went one-on-one with Foody.

Foody, however, blocked the attempt and was then able to collect the ball.

Tufts had several more dangerous chances on goal, but the Jumbos were not able to capitalize on any of the opportunities. According to Kaufmann, the keeper did a good job of coming out of the box to block shots.

“At the end of the second half, we were pushing and attacking and we had a lot of opportunities up in our half,” she said.

“Their goalie did a good job of coming out for balls that are usually 50-50 — she kept us from getting more opportunities.”

According to Brady, the team needs to focus on finishing out the game by playing hard the whole time.

“We need to play the full 90 minutes every game,” Brady said. “We had a lot of chances that would have put Middlebury away, we just have to keep our heads up.”

With a little more than half of the season now behind them, the Jumbos are looking to recover from back-to-back losses.

According to Kaufmann, now is a good time to get refocused as the excitement of the early season dies down and the results continue to matter.

“Our goal is to restart and reset and

Caroline Geiling / The Tufts Daily

Senior tri-captain Anya Kaufmann, pictured above in a game against Trinity, scored her third goal of the season for the Jumbos in the 2-1 loss to Middlebury Saturday. think of this as the beginning of our second season, trying to bring back the energy and intensity from earlier,” she said.

NESCAC games are still very much up in the air, as Bowdoin’s upset against Trinity this weekend shows. The fifthranked Polar Bears handed the Bantams their first loss of the season in a 3-0 shutout that will be sure to shake some things

up in the conference.

With four more conference games left, the Jumbos still have a chance to redeem themselves, as their focus is on future games from this point. Their next two tests come in the form of a Tuesday non-conference game against Endicott and a weekend matchup with Connecticut College.

Tufts comes to terms with grueling defeat FOOTBALL

continued from back

Mac Caputi went to work. They picked up four first downs, eating up five minutes in the process.

At the 2:53 mark, the Jumbos took down Brown in the backfield at the Tufts 30, at which point Civetti called his first timeout. Then, junior James Brao sacked Caputi for a loss of five, and Civetti stopped the clock again. On 3rd-and-16, Donnarumma picked up six yards; Civetti called his final timeout.

With the game in the balance on 4thand-10, senior tri-captain Sean Harrington made a diving play to break up Caputi’s pass intended for junior Ethan Drigotas.

Tufts got the ball at its own 29 with 2:37 remaining, needing a field goal to tie and a touchdown to win.

Doll made a gallant effort on the ensuing drive. First, he hit Rando for 21 yards

to Bowdoin’s 38. Next, he threw 14 yards to Lanzillo, who made an acrobatic play to keep his toes in bounds. Two plays later, he found Lanzillo again, this time for 12 yards to reach Bowdoin’s 10.

The Polar Bears were penalized for having 12 men on the field, pushing Tufts to the 5-yard line. Then, Doll lofted one to junior Harrison Kidd in the back corner of the end zone. Kidd was being faceguarded, and a flag flew in for defensive pass interference.

In accordance with NESCAC rules, the ball was spotted at the 2-yard line. With about 42 seconds remaining, the Jumbos seemed primed to punch it in and take the lead. But then Doll threw into traffic, and the 5-foot-9 Wickstrom leaped and snatched the ball at its apex.

On the Bowdoin side, players and fans erupted. On the Tufts side, they crumpled.

“It was a tough pill to swallow,”

Harrington said. “Guys were really upset after the game. ... But mental outlookwise, attitude-wise, character-wise, we’re the strongest we’ve been. I have faith in this program. It’s a matter of cleaning up those little issues that are going on.”

Yesterday, the players watched film of Saturday’s game and took the day to reflect on what went wrong. Today, they are moving on.

“They should be upset. They should be frustrated with the situation,” Civetti said.

“But at the same time, you have to be able to manage your emotions and manage the situation. We’ve got five more football games. You can’t tank [after] Week 3 because you’re 0-3.”The Jumbos, flawed as they may be, are a resilient bunch.

“It’s always darkest before the dawn,” Harrington said. “We’re gonna keep on pushing. One of these games, things are gonna turn around.”

Pinheiro’s first career goal carries Jumbos MEN’S SOCCER

continued from back

quick counter attacks into numerous scoring opportunities.

“I think we did a good job limiting free kicks, but in credit to them, I think they played better than us in certain parts of the game,” Ewing said. “We defended pretty well though, and we didn’t give up any goals, so we got it done.”

Both the defense and freshman keeper Scott Greenwood deserve equal amounts of credit for the shutout. Greenwood, who recorded his sixth shutout of the year, performed with composure in response to the Middlebury attack. Meanwhile, the defense consistently seemed to have a man sliding in at the last second to cut off a Middlebury player from the goal, which was part of the reason that of Middlebury’s 19 shots, only six of them were on goal.

“They had some pretty dangerous counterattacks,” sophomore midfielder Rui Pinheiro said. “We defended most of them pretty well, and Scottie

[Greenwood] played really well.”

The staunch defense finally paid off on the other end of the field in the 39th minute. Senior tri-captain forward Scott Blumenthal received the ball around midfield and raced down the sideline, beating several Middlebury players with a series of jukes. Finally, Blumenthal sent in a low cross to freshman midfielder Nathan Majumder, who received it well, and played a soft lead pass to Pinheiro, who laced a one-timer from the 18 past Middlebury keeper senior Ethan Collins for the first goal of the day and Pinheiro’s first goal of his career.

“It was great, and I was really excited, but I knew I had to get right back in the game,” Pinheiro said. “There were five minutes left in the first half, and the whole second half, so I knew I couldn’t let my mind wander.”

After the goal, the gameplay did not change much, with Middlebury continuing to attack throughout the rest of the game and Tufts continuing to respond. The Panthers recorded 10 shots in the second half but only two on

goal, a testament to the Jumbos’ perseverance on defense.

“I think we stepped it up a bit in the second half,” Ewing said. “We probably didn’t create as many chances as we could have, but we came close a few times. The midfield played really well in the second half, and we definitely picked it up from the first half, which I think was not as good a performance.”

The team, which was happy coming away with a win, still sees notable areas for improvement.

“I think we have to play our game,” Ewing said. “The NESCAC is a big league, and we are one of the smaller teams, so we need to impose our game and our style.”

For the Jumbos, that involves keeping the ball on the ground, playing an attacking kind of game and turning the opposing team over for quick counter attacks.

However, being able to come away with a win like the one on Saturday, when they don’t do those things, is just as important for Tufts.

T

he baseball playoffs are an interesting phenomenon. After a grueling 162game season, just one win can send a team to the Division Series.

There’s something unique about this time of year for baseball fans, and there’s a clear reason why: The games mean something.

It’s very difficult, given the busy lives we live, to sit down and watch five to six games a week when, in the long run, a single game doesn’t make or break a season for a team.

It’s hard to convince someone that game 73 in the middle of June is important enough to invest three and a half hours in.

To put the season length in perspective, each loss in the NFL is equivalent to roughly a ten-game losing streak in baseball terms.

At just 16 games, a three-game losing streak during the NFL season can be detrimental if it comes at the wrong time.

Yet, when there’s something on the line for baseball games, fans tune in. Each pitch is important, the plays need to be made and everyone has a chance to be the hero.

The regular season is what makes a player great, and the postseason is what makes him special.

This idea of importance isn’t something unique to the playoffs. It applies in our everyday lives as well. The most regularly populated classes in introductory level courses are the class before a test and the day of. Why? Because this is when it directly affects the grades of a student.

It is with this concept in mind that a new baseball season can be defined. Take 25 games off the schedule. End the season a month earlier, push the playoffs back a month and end the season by Oct. 1.

There are several factors in play that would benefit Major League Baseball if it was to pursue this endeavor. First off, even while baseball is in the heart of the pennant race, football dominates the television ratings.

Baseball does not get the time of day that it deserves at its most important point in the season.

Eliminating a month from the schedule will lessen the amount of overlap with football season. It’s an established fact that, for the casual sports fan, football owns three nights a week during fall months: Saturday, Sunday and Monday. Additionally, Thursday Night Football is another option for those with access to NFL Network. This leaves only three to four nights when baseball can be the main sports program for the night.

The thing is, though, as the postseason progresses the games start later and later. World Series games regularly finish between 12 to 1 in the morning. It’s not feasible to expect people with full-time jobs to stay up and watch the games, which hurts ratings more.

A second important factor is that with a shorter season, players are less likely to prolong injuries or take mental days off. The value of each individual game will increase and the on-field product will become stronger.

Now is the perfect time to cut the season down, because the record book is already in shambles. With the steroid era hopefully coming to a close, the numbers don’t mean nearly as much to the game as they used to. Who’s the real home-run king? Does Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa or Roger Maris have the most homeruns in a single season?

It’s highly unlikely that the owners will be willing to forfeit the revenue from the additional 25 games; however, in the best interest of the game, this could be something to consider. Baseball executives have an opportunity to grab the attention of the viewer, improve the quality of game played and make a change that could revolutionize the game as we know it, but until they do that — you’re sacked!

Jordan Bean is a sophomore who has not yet declared a major. He can be reached at Jordan.Bean@tufts.edu.

Sports

12

tuftsdaily.com

Football

Heartbreaker: Last-minute pick derails Tufts comeback by

Aaron Leibowitz

Daily Editorial Board

Maybe, in an alternate universe, Jack Doll threw the ball away on 1st-and-goal. Maybe the junior

FOOTBALL (0-3 Overall, 0-3 NESCAC) at Zimman Field, Saturday Bowdoin 0 10 3 0 — 13 Tufts 0 3 0 7 — 10 held onto it and went down near the line of scrimmage. Maybe, just maybe, he evaded the pass rush, found an open man and ended the longest losing streak in college football.

Any of those scenarios would make more sense than what really happened Saturday at Zimman Field.

Down 13-10 with under a minute remaining, Tufts was on Bowdoin’s 2-yard line. Doll floated a pass toward the goal line, intended for classmate Greg Lanzillo. The pass was intercepted. Bowdoin senior Tim Wickstrom caught the ball and put a dagger through the Jumbos’ hearts.

Over the last 26 games, Tufts football has experienced its share of anguish, including 10 losses by eight points or fewer. And yet, as they marched down the field in the final minutes on Saturday, the Jumbos had 1,200 fans convinced.

After three years of frustration, they were finally going to exorcise

ethan chan for the tufts daily

Tufts football fell just short of its first win of the season, dropping the home opener 13-10 on Saturday. The Jumbos are back at it Oct. 12 at home against Trinity. their demons.

Then Wickstrom came down with the ball and the Polar Bears took a knee to run out the clock: Bowdoin 13, Tufts 10. That’s the reality the Jumbos must live with.

“What should have happened is we should have won the game,” head coach Jay Civetti said Sunday.

“We should have made the play.”

On the previous possession, Tufts’ defense had bent but did not

break. Civetti used all three of his timeouts, leaving 2:37 to go when the Jumbos took over on downs at their own 29. From there, they marched to the goal line.

“Jack [Doll] did his job,” Civetti said. “Jack’s supposed to complete the passes and get us into a position to score. He did his job in terms of getting us there. ... We just didn’t finish.”

The game was a defensive battle

Men’s Soccer

from the start. Tufts pulled ahead, 3-0, in the second quarter when freshman Willie Holmquist converted his first career field goal, a 30-yarder. But Bowdoin scored the next 13 points.

First, sophomore Andrew Murowchick hit a 30-yard field goal. Then, the Polar Bears drove 73 yards and scored a touchdown with 13 seconds left in the opening half. Senior Zach Donnarumma,

see FOOTBALL, page 11

Women’s Soccer

Late goal gives Middlebury 2-1 win over Tufts

Despite getting out to an early lead, the Jumbos fell to the Middlebury Panthers during Parents Weekend on a goal scored by

Claire Sleigh

Daily Editorial Board

WOMEN’S SOCCER (4-4 Overall, 3-3 NESCAC) at Kraft Field, Saturday Middlebury Tufts

Oliver Porter / The Tufts Daily

Senior tri-captain Scott Blumenthal started the scoring process for the lone goal of the game, beating the Middlebury defenders down the left side before crossing the ball in.

Jumbos win fourth NESCAC game, outlast Panthers

by Jake Indursky

Daily Editorial Board

The men’s soccer players went out to Kraft Field on Saturday without their best stuff — their through balls were just

MEN’S SOCCER (6-2-1 Overall, 4-2 NESCAC) at Kraft Field, Saturday Middlebury Tufts

who rushed 29 times for 136 yards, capped it with a 1-yard run. Later, in the third quarter, Murowchick hit from 29 yards to make the score 13-3.

The Polar Bears got away with some sloppy play, including seven penalties for 53 yards, five fumbles — three on bad snaps and one on a dropped punt — and an interception. But for much of the game, the Jumbos failed to take advantage.

“Our identity needs to be more consistently there,” Civetti said.

“That’s probably the best way I could say it. We can’t just wake up when the game’s on the line.”

After three straight drives of seven yards or fewer to close out the third quarter, Tufts’ offense finally began to click early in the fourth. Starting at his team’s own 31, Doll engineered a 69-yard touchdown drive, highlighted by a 30-yard strike under pressure to freshman Mike Rando at Bowdoin’s 6-yard line.

On 4th-and-goal inside the 1, Doll handed off to freshman Chance Brady, who slipped through the line for his first collegiate touchdown. Holmquist’s extra point made it 13-10 with 11:35 left.

Bowdoin and Tufts traded fruitless possessions before the Polar Bears got the ball at their own 20 with eight minutes to play. That’s when Donnarumma, sophomore running back Trey Brown and junior quarterback

0 1

0 0

— —

0 1

going long, their crosses weren’t finding blue jerseys — all while Middlebury players seemed to keep creating shots.

But the sign of a good team is a team that can win without its best stuff, and that’s exactly what Tufts did against Middlebury, battling to a 1-0 win to move

into third place in the NESCAC. Tufts, one of the smaller teams in the NESCAC, had to deal with a big Middlebury attack and planned accordingly.

“Middlebury is a physical team,” senior defender Ben Ewing said. “I think they kind of outsized us, so we wanted to limit free kick opportunities and try and keep the ball on the ground.”

However, both teams’ opportunities were limited for the first 18 minutes, as neither team found space to shoot, until sophomore midfielder Connor Brown and junior tri-captain forward Maxime Hoppenot ripped off consecutive shots.

The Tufts assault appeared to wake up Middlebury, who began pressuring the Jumbos for the rest of the half, turning see MEN’S SOCCER, page 11

0 1

2 0

— —

2 1

off a corner kick in the last two minutes of the game. For the Jumbos, it was a heartbreaking loss, filled with missed opportunities in the second half to put the game away.

The Jumbos saw their record drop to .500 in both conference and overall play, while Middlebury retained its second-place spot in the NESCAC. Following losses to the top two ranked teams, Trinity and Middlebury, Tufts’ ranking dropped from third to fifth in the conference standings.

Despite the loss, the Jumbos came away with mixed feelings because they were able to control the ball well and create chances up top, according to senior tricaptain Anya Kaufmann.

“We had a lot of opportunities and we were moving the ball well; I think it was really one of our better games,” Kaufmann said. “We just had the few mental lapses that they took advantage of and scored.”

Middlebury closed out the game on a corner kick from sophomore Jaime Soroka that curled in front of the net and bounced around before the Jumbos were able to clear it. Junior Sophia Kligler got a foot on it and found the back of the net to put Middlebury in the lead and secure a win for the Panthers.

According to senior tri-captain defend-

er Blair Brady, the defense had a good game but needs to improve on moments in the box.

“Defensively we played strong, it’s on set pieces that we need to be better marked up,” Brady said.

Senior goalie Kristin Wright echoed Brady’s sentiments. Wright and the rest of the defense had a good game, and Middlebury happened to capitalize on the couple of slip-ups.

“I know as a team we were frustrated with the end result,” she said. “On paper it doesn’t look like it, but we played really strong. The two goals they had were just momentary defensive breakdowns where those 30 seconds did not go according to plan.”

The Jumbos took the advantage in the early part of the game with a goal from Kaufmann 17 minutes in. Junior midfielder Carla Kruyff slotted a ball in through a couple of defenders, and Kaufmann was able to run onto it and sneak it past senior goalkeeper Elizabeth Foody for her third goal of the season.

The Jumbos did not have too many other opportunities in the first half, but Kaufmann felt that they played well.

Overall, it was a low shooting period, with Middlebury outshooting Tufts 4-2, but with neither team in clear control.

Middlebury came out hard in the second half, and sophomore Hannah Robinson was able to beat her defender and put one away for the Panthers just ten minutes in.

According to Kaufmann, the team felt a bit of a mental setback after the tying goal but rebounded quickly with some good chances on goal.

“In some ways the goal took a little steam out of us,” Kaufmann said. “We tried to bounce back and be aggressive, and I thought we succeeded. We came out see WOMEN’S SOCCER, page 11