tuftsdaily4.24.13

THE TUFTS DAILY

Partly Cloudy 66/49

TUFTSDAILY.COM

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

VOLUME LXV, NUMBER 58

Where You Read It First Est. 1980

Victory for Thibodeau in TCU presidential race by

Melissa Wang

Daily Editorial Board

In the first three-way Tufts Community Union (TCU) presidential race in recent memory, junior Joe Thibodeau won the presidency over junior senators Joe Donenfeld and Christie Maciejewski following a curtailed week of heavy campaigning.

“I’m just really honored and humbled for this opportunity,” Thibodeau said. “I look forward to collaborating with many people over the next year and really getting to work in September.”

Nine out of 11 referenda on the ballot also passed in yesterday’s election, making changes to the TCU constitution and the way Senate runs. These included adding the Diversity and Community Affairs (DCA) officer to Senate’s executive board and removing the candidate-raised portion of presidential campaign funds. The two referenda that failed, the seventh and eighth, clarified aspects of the constitution regarding voting and the TCU Treasury.

The voter turnout for the presidential election was 57.5 percent of the student body — 3,006 undergraduates. This was an increase over last year’s 49.79 percent turnout where 2,574 voted.

This year, 40 students abstained.

Thibodeau received 1,419 first-place votes, Donenfeld received 960 first-place votes and Maciejewski received 627 first-place votes. The ballots of those who placed Maciejewski as their first choice were then re-distributed among the other two candidates, with 338 votes going to Thibodeau and 219 votes going to Donenfeld. In the end, Thibodeau’s 1,757 votes trumped Donenfeld’s 1,179.

Thibodeau’s platform empha-

Oliver Porter / The Tufts Daily

Joe Thibodeau celebrated his election as the TCU President from Spain with his campaign team last night. sized his hope to better support diversity on campus. He served as the Senate’s first DCA officer, and he acted as chair of the Culture, Ethnicity & Community Affairs Committee (CECA).

“A lot of my work that I’ve done on this campus, on Senate, has been very collaborative where I’ve reached out to a lot of communities and people,” he said. “I have a deep love for this place and the people that make it up ... I think this reflects that the student body recognizes that there are a lot of different issues on campus.

They’re ready for a leader who will bring people to the table, actually

foster debate and create substantive change.”

Thibodeau acknowledged his opponents’ accomplishments and was proud of the work they have done to connect different communities on campus.

“It’s been such a pleasure to serve on Senate with them for the past three years when we all came in as freshmen,” he said. “The fact that they both ran successful campaigns is a testament to the hard work they’ve put in and the people they’ve connected with.”

With a strong campaign team, Thibodeau was able to secure the victory despite not being

on campus for the election. The “Thibs Gets Tufts” campaign included mass chalking and flyering, a flash mob in DewickMacPhie Dining Center, a music video and a cardboard picture of the candidate.

“He is abroad in Madrid, but I look around in the group I’m with and there isn’t a better group,” Thibodeau’s campaign manager Rose Mendelsohn, a junior, said. “It speaks volumes to the kind of president he’s going to be that these people gathered in a room to support him while he isn’t here.”

“We are so thankful,” she

added. “It makes me really proud of Tufts and so excited to see what he’s going to do with the trust everyone has given him.”

Donenfeld congratulated Thibodeau on his well-run campaign and said he supports him as president.

“Joe is going to do an incredible job. He’s an incredible guy with incredible ideas and an incredible team behind him,” Donenfeld said. “He has my full support. I love the guy. I had different ideas, but I’ve been with Joe since freshman year.”

Despite her loss of the presidency, Maciejewski said that she would still stay on Senate and would consider running for treasurer again, or as a student representative to the Board of Trustees.

She thanked her supporters for their encouragement and said she would still work for the initiatives she outlined in her presidential campaign platform.

“The support was incredible, and there were a lot of people that I didn’t know who were behind me who were, and I really appreciate that,” she said. “I’m so glad Joe Thibodeau won -- if there was anyone who won it should have been him, and I believe that 100 percent. I’m really happy for him.”

Elections Commission Public Relations Chair Paige Newman said that there was likely a higher turnout this year than in past years because of the number of candidates.

“We think that the reason why there were so many more people than last year is that there were three candidates rather than two, so that reached out to a lot more people,” Newman, a freshman, said. “What we really liked about this was that more people were able to get engaged in the TCU.”

Office of Equal Opportunity Diversity report reveals lower set for move from Ballou percentage of students of color

by Jenna

Buckle

Daily Editorial Board

The Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) will relocate this summer from the first floor of Ballou Hall to 196 Boston Avenue, with the intention of increasing meeting space and the privacy of the office.

The off-campus move will also accommodate the expansion of the OEO staff, including the hiring of an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) specialist, according to Director of Public Relations Kimberly Thurler and Director of the OEO Jill Zellmer.

“The new location will offer many advantages compared with the current location in Ballou Hall or any other available space on the Hill, and reflects Tufts’ commitment to strong support for all aspects of equal opportunity and non-discrimination,” Thurler told the Daily in an email.

Zellmer explained that many people do not want to be seen coming in and out of the OEO office in Ballou Hall, so the

move to a more remote location will help solve privacy issues.

“It provides us with a different level of confidentiality that is better for a lot of people, not just students, but faculty and staff as well,” she said.

The OEO currently meets with students, faculty and staff wherever they are most comfortable and will continue to do so after the relocation, but the office will maintain a “swing space” on campus for those who prefer to meet off the Hill, Zellmer said.

To access the new OEO location, students can take the Boston Avenue shuttle that runs during the academic year, Thurler said.

Zellmer acknowledged that a disadvantage of the new office is its distance from campus, but she hopes to extend the Boston Avenue shuttle service so that it runs all day instead of starting at noon.

“It feels far to some students to go down see OEO, page 2

Inside this issue

by

Alex Kaufman

Daily Editorial Board

The President’s Council on Diversity released a progress report April 11 with findings that show a decrease in diversity at Tufts over the past several years and delivers recommendations to the university regarding the undergraduate experience.

“Since 2001, [the percent] of Black, Hispanic, Asian undergraduates at Tufts has consistently decreased or plateaued,” the report states.

Depending on the topic at hand, the council broadly defined diversity in the progress report as race and ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation and gender identity or expression, physical ability, religion, geographic origin and language background or socioeconomic status.

TheWorking Group on the Undergraduate Student Experience (UWG) compiled recommendations based on five majors themes: campus climate, the undergraduate experience, faculty-student relationships, access and equity and data.

The working group found that Tufts enrolled the lowest number of African American or black undergraduates compared to its 11 peer institutions in 2011 and was second lowest in Hispanic student enrollment.

School of Arts & Sciences Dean Joanne Berger-Sweeney, who served as the vice chair of the council, said she was surpised that compositional diversity across the school’s campuses had plateaued.

“I know that the university has been keeping diversity in the forefront, but without significant increases in the number of people of color in the student, staff, or faculty populations...we must do better,” she said in an email to the Daily.

Pan-African Alliance co-president Tabias Wilson said he was pleased with how the report was carried out and appreciated its emphasis on figures and tracking metrics.

The numbers, he said, display a stark reality for students on campus.

“Tufts has been a draining place, a site see DIVERSITY, page 2

Today’s sections

Political science professor Jeffrey Berry reflects on four decades on the Hill.

Jake Bugg brings his comination of nostalgia and originality stateside.

see FEATURES, page 3

see ARTS, page 5

News Features Arts & Living Editorial

1 3 5 8

Op-Ed Comics Classifieds Sports

9 10 11 Back

The Tufts Daily

2

News

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Council on Diversity releases annual progress report DIVERSITY

continued from page 1

of exhaustion, for many queer folks, women and people of color — particularly those who span a multitude of these identities,” Wilson, a senior, said.

In addition, the report states these students have continued to face comparatively more obstacles to their scholastic achievement due to their backgrounds than their white peers.

“According to the Tufts Senior Survey 2011, there has been a decline since 2007 in terms of whether our graduating seniors who are non-resident alien, Asian, Hispanic or Black or African American would choose Tufts again if given the opportunity to relive their college experience,” the report says.

According to the study, certain groups experience marginalization inside and outside of the classroom, and minority groups are more likely to reach out to heterosexual or white students on campus to organize events together.

Wilson said that although the report was a good first step, it needs to go more in depth in researching the experiences of students with intersectional identities.

This would include queer multiracial students, low income white students and queer women.

He added that the report is correct in stating that there is a need for more racial diversity in tenured professors.

“We have one AfricanAmerican academic dean, and she has become the de-facto dean for most people of color,” he said.

“This is unacceptable.”

Queer Straight Alliance president Max Tanguay-Colucci , said that he was surprised by the findings of the report.

“At Tufts we like to believe that we are an equitable and very socially conscious institution,” Tanguay-Colucci, a sophomore, said. “But the facts and figures in the report demonstrate that there is still a lot of work to do as far as creating a university that is truly equitable in regards to socioeconomic studies, in regards to race,

Oliver Porter / The Tufts Daily

The Council on Diversity, chaired by University President Anthony Monaco, on April 11 released a progress report on the state of diversity of Tufts. gender and sexual orientation.”

He said that diversity can only be fully achieved when students from all backgrounds feel comfortable expressing themselves,

regardless of with which groups they choose to take part.

Launched in 2012, the Council on Diversity is chaired

by University President Anthony

Students’ photo of Syrian goodwill goes viral

Monaco and vice-chaired by Dean of the School of Arts and Sciences Joanne Berger-Sweeney, with members consisting of staff, faculty, students and two mem-

bers of the Board of Trustees.

The Council on Diversity will release its final recommendations after a community consultation scheduled for next Monday.

Office of Equal Opportunity to be relocated to Boston Avenue OEO

continued from page 1

Courtesy Sabrina Ghaus

Tufts students and Somerville residents gathered this weekend to create a banner wishing for peace and safety to those in Syria in response to a photo Syrians had taken following the marathon attacks to offer condolences to Boston. As of press time, the photo has received nearly one million views on the image sharing website Imgur.

[to Boston Avenue],” she said.

The university last December began the process of relocating the OEO after the position of ADA specialist was created, Zellmer said. There is not enough room in the Ballou office for another staff member, she said.

Options for relocation included the basement of Carmichael Hall or an off-campus space, according to Zellmer.

“They knew I wanted to be on campus, but space is at a premium,” she said. “It was a decision I had to make. Did I want to be in the basement of Carmichael on campus, or did I want to have a much nicer space with windows and a conference room?”

Kumar Ramanathan, an organizer of the student group Action for Sexual Assault Prevention, voiced concerns about the OEO’s move off campus, explaining that the new location may make the OEO less accessible to victims of sexual assault.

“OEO is the closest we have as a confidential, trusted place to go to report your case, find out what the resources are and ... decide whether or not to prosecute,” Ramanathan, a sophomore, said.

“Especially for someone who has just been assaulted ... the ready

availability of the office, knowing that you can go there, is really empowering.”

Tufts, unlike many peer institutions, does not have a staff member with a specific focus on sexual assault prevention and response, according to Ramanathan. But the OEO’s current central location shows the university’s dedication to issues of discrimination and sexual misconduct, he said.

“Its presence in Ballou ... stands as a symbol that this is something that matters to Tufts as a university, that fighting discrimination actively is something that matters to Tufts and fighting sexual assault is something that matters to Tufts,” Ramanathan said.

He believes that other locations on campus, such as Dowling Hall, could be better options for the relocation.

“It makes me question how much the rest of the administration really values OEO, and seeing this from the student side, I know that OEO’s presence and activity over the past few years has been very supportive of survivors and is trusted amongst various communities,” Ramanathan said. “The fact that it’s moving basically off campus is disheartening.”

Features

3

tuftsdaily.com

Berry recalls transformation of Tufts, political science department by

Alexa Petersen | Jeminist: A Jumbo Feminist

Ann Coulter is awful

Lukas Papenfusscline Contributing Writer

Evolution is a crucial word in Professor of Political Science Jeffrey Berry’s lexicon.

He frequently describes Tufts students, faculty and political science as constantly evolving entities. Having worked at Tufts for almost 40 years, he has seen the development of the university and the department as they have similarly evolved through the decades.

Berry started working on the Hill in 1974 after finishing his PhD at Johns Hopkins University. In his first years, he taught a course called “Political Parties,” as well as a seminar on interest groups, both of which eventually fell by the wayside. He has, however, continued to teach “PS 101: Presidency and the Executive Branch” as well as “PS 102: Congress, Bureaucracy, and Public Policy” since beginning.

Over time, Berry inherited his urban politics class, “Politics in the City,” from a retired professor and also created his course “Nonprofits and Civil Society” after researching and writing a book on the subject. Recently, he has focused on analyzing media and politics, which led to his “New Media, New Politics” course.

Berry has seen a dramatic transformation of the political science department over his years at Tufts.

“When I came they were just starting to have rumblings about creating an international relations program. It’s now one of the biggest majors on campus, and a major draw. It has helped to define Tufts’ niche in the undergraduate college marketplace as a place to study things international,” Berry told the Daily.

Berry said the political science department has evolved as the stature of the school and pull for educatio of political and international issues have increased.

He has found that faculty members are far more prominent and published than they used to be.

“When I arrived here, probably half of the faculty were not actively publishing, and today across the 20 or so colleagues, they’re all active and doing terrific work. It’s hard to imagine [the department] doing better,” Berry said.

While the advancement of the faculty itself may not be a particular draw for high school students interested in political science, the growing reputation of the school and faculty members has certainly indicated to 17- and 18-year-olds that Tufts is a powerhouse in political science and international relations, particularly due to the celebrated faculty and association with the Fletcher School.

Berry, who served as the department’s chair for three years, has also witnessed a dramatic increase in the caliber of political science students.

“The change is evolutionary,” he said. “Students were strong when I got here, but over time I’ve seen a significant improvement.”

Even discounting SAT scores, he says, students today are “very serious.

I assign a lot of work in my classes, and they do it. They come to class engaged and they’re articulate and impassioned when talking about politics, and yet I think they’re fair-minded and open to hearing the views of others,” he said.

Still, he also sees a strong link between his past and current students.

“If I think about my students in the ’70s, they don’t seem radically different than the students today, so there is a continuity,” Berry said. “Students today are better, but they’re not a different animal; they’re an improved version of what was here.”

Deborah Schildkraut, an associate professor of political science and a former student of Berry’s in her undergraduate years at Tufts, said that it was Berry, in fact, who pushed her toward a

Nick Pfosi / The Tufts Daily

Jeffrey Berry has witnessed 40 years of change at Tufts and in the political science department.

Ph.D. in political science as her advisor when he was chair of the department.

Schildkraut, who came back to Tufts to teach in 2003, finds current students engaged and bright.

“It’s very easy to just get absorbed in your coursework and social life and not really pay attention to what’s going on in the world around you, but I’m often very impressed about how much my students know about key votes that are happening in Congress — they’re very active,” she said. “I have students, many of whom know their members of Congress or have worked for their members of Congress and have done just amazing political science internships, so I’m always impressed with the personal political experiences that my students bring to their courses.”

She similarly characterized the political science department faculty as large, young and vibrant. Schildkraut approached Berry to be her advisor after current Dean of Academic Affairs and then professor Jim Glaser, who she originally had sought as her advisor, recommended him. “[Berry] brought me to his office, and I distinctly remember him telling me that he wasn’t all that interested in helping me make sure I fulfilled the courses I needed to graduate,” Schildkraut said.

“He said, ‘I’m more interested in learning who you are, what interests you, helping you figure out how to achieve your career’ ... he was just really interested in me as a person, and that’s a lesson that I have tried to adopt in my own interactions with students because I remember it was just very meaningful ... no one had ever actually, explicitly, treated me, to be blunt, like an adult in that way.” “[Berry would] interact with you as a person and not just a student with boxes I need to check off on a form. That made a big impact on me,” Schildkraut added.

Berry has also been an active researcher during his time at Tufts, and has published a large volume of articles, books and papers focusing on a number of different issues in contemporary politics, including lobbying, nonprofits, urban politics, sustainability, policy change, the new liberalism and the “outrage industry” of media pundits aiming to split the American population. Berry has even co-written several papers with students who have acted as research assistants in the past. When asked about working as both a teacher and researcher, Berry noted that the two

are integrated.

“I believe that I bring my research to the classroom and students profit,” he said. “Teaching for me is stimulating, and I’ve always seemed to teach at least one class which relates to my research,” he explained.

Schildkraut, who is an active researcher as well as a professor, addressed balancing.

“To be able to have the content of the classes dovetailed with what I’m researching benefits me intellectually and it keeps me particularly engaged when I’m in the classroom and really interested in hearing the students’ perspectives on the reading that we’re doing. “But other times it’s hard; there are definitely times in the semester when I just don’t have time to do my research,” she said.

Currently, Berry is working on two projects in contrasting areas of political science. His first, a book called “The Outrage Industry,” is co-authored with Associate Professor Sarah Sobieraj of the Sociology Department at Tufts and will be published this fall by Oxford University Press.

“It’s a study of cable television, talk radio and political blogs. It’s a study of people who are in the business of trying to polarize us,” Berry said.

He emphasized that it is a carefully researched work of scholarship aimed at understanding figures like Rush Limbaugh and Rachel Maddow, not merely a complaint about modern media and extreme personalities.

His second project, a collaboration with political science professor Kent Portney, is focused on sustainability and urban politics, and aims to explain why some cities ardently strive to protect the environment protection and create a sustainable system, while others do little more than “give lip service to environmental protection.”

The quantitative study is based on “two very massive databases,” he explained.

“One is on what cities actually do in terms of environmental protection, and the other is a survey of city councilors, city administrators and advocacy group leaders in 50 of the largest cities in the United States,” he said.

Research, writing, teaching: — ultimately, Berry relishes it all.

“You spend the day differently, but the grey matter in your brain pretty much covers the same territory when you’re teaching and when you’re writing,” Berry said.

I

am told all the Features columnists get to have a column in the Commencement issue of the Daily. This makes me feel A) forever immortalized, because my column will end up in some college box that your parents will keep in their attic for the next 40 years, and B) less inclined to say something profound and/or gushy in this particular column, as I will get my gushy moment of glory in the Commencement issue (never fear!).

How do I wrap up this yearlong stint as a columnist in this penultimate entry and also try to make funny jokes? I can give a mostly depressing but occasionally inspiring review of the major political issues surrounding women’s rights in the last year and hope it suffices.

In an example of a woman who does really good things for women, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rocked it. We saw her serve as an exemplary example of women in high political office, and we also saw her actively advocating for women’s rights worldwide. And now we’re patiently waiting for 2016 ... and have joined the “Ready for Hillary” Facebook group (is that just me?).

In an example of a woman who does the opposite of good things for women (or anyone), Ann Coulter is still awful. She says misguided things like: “Guns are our friends, because in a country without guns I’m what’s known as ‘prey.’ All females are.”

And of course it follows that, with guns, women cease to be prey and everyone is happy so long as we shun birth control and wear our chastity promise rings.

In other unsurprising news, Republicans in both houses were responsible for killing the Violence Against Women Act in 2012, in the most obvious passing-this-bill-is-ano-brainer in the history of no-brainers.

Republicans allowed its passage in 2013 but were profusely grumpy about it and demanded problematic exceptions.

In the 2012 election cycle, Sandra Fluke stood up for a woman’s right to birth control, no matter what kind of religious or political affiliation her insurance provider associates with. She withstood hateful conservative propaganda and came out on top — with her dignity, with the support of a nation and, ultimately, with the success of a presidential candidate who supported her rights as a woman.

Oh yes and, before we forget, in 2012 Mitt Romney didn’t care about women. Ninetyfive percent of me can look back on this and say: You didn’t support women, and women didn’t vote for you. And then you lost. That is extremely satisfying. But five percent of me remembers that we are in the 21st century and one of the two major candidates running for president of the United States thought he could either ignore women’s rights or gloss over them lightly and still win. What the Republicans took away from the 2012 election: Women are going to vote Democrat until the Republicans get it together. And this is a success, because our votes made politicians listen.

Also, anyone who has forgotten the image of Ann Romney screaming, “I love you women!” on national television should not do so, because both the awkwardness and irony of this scene should bring you laughter and delight for years to come.

For those who have read my columns, my hope is that I have helped make you more comfortable or more proud to describe yourself as a feminist, and to continue to think about what being a feminist really means to you. As for me I’m still not sure.

What I do know is that the political discourse on women’s rights over the last year gives me continued inspiration to keep trying to figure it out. And keep fighting for my right to be a full-fledged human in the eyes of my country.

Alexa Petersen is a senior majoring in political science and peace and justice studies. She can be reached at Alexa.Petersen@tufts.edu.

The Tufts Daily

4

advertisement

Studying abroad in fall 2013?

Be prepared for your semester or year abroad!**

Upcoming required pre-departure meetings: Programs Abroad staff and study abroad alumni will discuss the pre-departure checklist, health and safety issues, transfer of credit, cultural adaptation and more!

Tufts Programs

Non-Tufts Programs

Tufts in Madrid/Paris/T端bingen Africa/Asia/Caribbean/Latin America/Middle East Tuesday, April 30th Tuesday, April 30th 2:30 pm 10:30 am Tufts in China/Japan Mainland Europe Wednesday, May 1st Wednesday, May 1st 10:30 am 2:30 pm Tufts in London/Oxford Australia/NZ/UK/Ireland Thursday, May 2nd Thursday, May 2nd 10:30 am 2:30 pm

*All meetings will be held in Braker Hall 001* PLEASE NOTE: If you cannot attend your non-Tufts meeting, please attend an alternate non-Tufts meeting. If you cannot attend your Tufts meeting, please attend an alternate Tufts meeting. **Students studying abroad spring 2014 will be required to attend pre-departure meetings during Reading Period in December 2013.

Meetings are required.

Questions? Call x7-5871.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Arts & Living

5

tuftsdaily.com

Musician Profile

Melissa MacEwen | The Roaming Fork

Roam on

I

Courtesy wfuv via Flickr Creative Commons

Bugg has been compared to sensations like Bob Dylan, but his success has not fazed him.

British artist Jake Bugg shines by pairing nostalgia with originality by

Kelsey Davenport

Contributing Writer

Singer-songwriter Jake Bugg burst onto the American music scene earlier this month when his self-titled debut album hit stores stateside. At nineteen, he has already achieved critical acclaim in his native England, topping the UK album charts in October of last year. Bugg learned to play the acoustic guitar at a young age and started doing local gigs in his hometown of Nottingham when he was around 17 years old. He was discovered after being chosen by BBC to appear on stage at the Glastonbury Festival in 2011. Soon after, he signed a record deal.

His album starts off strong with the single “Lightning Bolt” and gathers momentum as it progresses. The tracks boast both

a catchy beat and smooth lyrics that reflect an uncommon wit. His pithy writing packs a punch, and most of the songs are under three minutes, keeping the message short and sweet.

Bugg has a unique, rocky voice that infuses a sense of nostalgia into his songs, lending a retro feel to modern themes. He is being hailed as the new Bob Dylan and is frequently plugged as the antidote to the substance-less pop that has invaded the music scene of late. Yet he does not appear to be overwhelmed by his sudden success: when compared to Bob Dylan, he has been known to respond that Dylan was “great, but not a major influence.” He is more likely to have been influenced by the British punk/pop scene of the past few decades. The record is more reminiscent

of Oasis’ Gallagher brothers or the swaggering sound of The Coral.

Bugg has also been making headlines recently for his dismissal of big-name bands such as Mumford & Sons and One Direction.

Referring to Mumford & Son’s members as looking “like posh farmers with banjos,” he implicitly accused their folksy image of being dishonest. Despite the questionable validity and pettiness of his critiques, his opinions do not detract from his merit as a musician. For someone who is not yet 20 years old, he writes with remarkable aptitude and maturity. At times, though, his youth does distract from the music. Although no musician should be defined by his or her age, it is hard to take lyrics like, “I’ve seen it all, I’ve seen it all/Nothing shocks me anymore” see BUGG, page 6

Movie Review

Boyle’s ‘Trance’ relies heavily on soundtrack, visuals to excite audiences by

Dan O’Leary

Daily Editorial Board

“Trance,” the latest film by Academy Award-winning director Danny Boyle of “127 Hours” (2010) and “Slumdog

Trance Directed by Danny Boyle Starring James McAvoy, Vincent Cassel, Rosario Dawson Millionaire” (2008), has opened to mixed reviews by critics and it’s easy enough to see why. On one hand, “Trance” often succeeds in its role as a dark and twisty thriller; it is visually mesmerizing and contains a pulsing score that underlines the action as events move at a rapid pace. On the other hand, however, “Trance” is held back from its full potential due to a plot that gets increasingly convoluted as the film progresses. Which side of the argument wins out depend on how intensely you hold the film up to scrutiny. On the whole, “Trance” is an

enjoyable thriller with flaws become more apparent in the days after watching it.

“Trance” opens with a fascinating narration by Simon ( James McAvoy).

An art auctioneer describes the procedures in place should a heist be attempted. Boyle intertwines this with shots of the film’s actual thieves, led

by Franck ( Vincent Cassel), preparing for an actual heist on the auction house. All of this makes for a gripping sequence.When all hell breaks during the actual heist, Simon is left bloodied and unconscious. We soon find out that Simon was secretly working with Franck and company to engineer the heist, but the desired painting went missing sometime between the heist’s beginning and when the thieves escaped, with Simon being the one person who knows its location. There’s only one problem — he can’t remember where it went. This leads Franck to seek out the services of a professional hypnotherapist, Elizabeth (Rosario Dawson), in the hopes that she’ll help Simon remember the painting’s location.

This opening sequence sets up a fascinating premise for the movie, which then begins to unfold at an ever-quickening pace, leading to an increasing number of plot twists and turns — some telegraphed, some not — that present a puzzle for the audience to try to piece together in a similar vein to Christopher Nolan’s “Inception” (2010). Many of these earlier twists are made believable by the excellent performances of the three leads, who do an admirable job with what they’re given in a script that often seems to favor plot development over character.

One interesting achievement of the script, however, is that it manages to have viewers change their allegiances with characters throughout the film.

One of the film’s biggest strengths is its visuals and presentation, which can largely be attributed to Boyle.

“Trance” immediately pulls you in and doesn’t let go, at times mimicking the hypnotism that Simon is undergoing.

Boyle utilizes a visual palette filled with bright colors that makes for fansee TRANCE, page 6

can’t believe it — this is my last column of the semester. I am sad about this, to say the least. From caterpillars to taro roots to kava, thank you so much for joining me on this culinary adventure. What a long, strange trip it’s been. I hope this column, if nothing else, has helped you appreciate the weird, wonderful diversity of food that exists on this planet — and what a remarkable selection of things turn out to be edible.

I hope I’ve opened your horizons, but if you’ve tuned in each week just to be grossed out and laugh at me, that’s fine too. Still, as we part ways, I’d like to encourage you to take the plunge. Eat something you’re not familiar with. If it’s cooked properly, the worst thing that’s likely to happen is that you don’t like it.

I was torn about what I wanted my last food to be. I had to go out with a bang, you know? Initially, I had planned to make something with fufu flour, a type of root-based flour that is popular in Africa.

Above all, I like this food’s name, but it’s interesting, too — many African cultures make fufu dumplings that they eat with soups and stews. You are not supposed to chew fufu, though. Instead, you use it as a utensil to deliver food to your mouth, before swallowing it whole. When I prepared it, I completely ignored this standard preparation (because I happen to like chewing) and discovered that fufu was delicious when fried in butter and served with maple syrup. This might have been a first in the world of fufu, but I was still willing to share it with you. However, upon an ingredients check, I discovered that this cocoyam fufu flour only contained cassava (yuca) and taro, which I had already written about.

Instead, I think it’s appropriate to sign off with a tried-and-true favorite that, though somewhat uncommon in America, has a major international presence: the plantain. I first learned about plantains from my seventh grade French class, when we were learning about “les francophones” in Africa. Thanks colonialism! Plantains are a staple of Côte d’Ivoire’s cuisine and, needless to say, I’ve been a fan ever since I tried to cook one for extra credit. Plantains look a lot like bananas, but they are starchier and more substantial than their counterparts. Like bananas, they are rich in fiber and potassium, but they are tougher and therefore aren’t usually eaten raw. Their ready availability, sweet/savory flavor and easy preparation make them a staple food in much of Africa and South America, to the point where they’re commonly referred to as “cooking bananas.”

Because I am young and wild and free, I didn’t follow a recipe for plantains; instead, I took a potentially uncreative approach and made what essentially turned out to be Plantains Foster. But seriously, you should try this one.

First, buy some plantains. It’s okay if they’re pretty brown on the outside, that won’t negatively affect their flavor. Plantains can be fried when under ripe, but when they’re cooked when ripe or overripe, they caramelize. Slice them into disks. Roll each disk in brown sugar. Fry the disks in a mixture of peanut oil and rum. Serve with vanilla ice cream and peanuts. And you’re done! It might lack the fire and bombast of actual Bananas Foster — mostly because I somehow forgot about the light-everything-on-fire part — but seriously, this dessert is delicious. And did I mention that it’s easy?

Thanks for everything, dear readers. Happy eating. And if you’re up for it, find me on campus and we can eat bugs together.

Melissa MacEwen is a junior majoring in biology and English. She can be reached at melissa.macewen@tufts.edu.

The Tufts Daily

6

Bugg exudes authenticity, despite youth BUGG

continued from page 5

seriously when they are sung by a teenager. The lyrics of another billboard hit, “Two Fingers,” depict a life spent bumming on the streets of Nottingham with buddies. As Bugg confidently croons “I drink to remember/I smoke to forget” and “Skin up a fat one/hide from the Feds,” it is clear his formative years were spent rebelling against small town confines.

Still, his precociousness is more impressive than irritating. While it is obvious that Bugg wants to be viewed as an authentic musician, it’s equally obvious that he actually is one.

After playing his first show at his high school, his friends begged him to audition for British variety show “Britain’s Got Talent.” Bugg refused — “It doesn’t seem genuine,” he said. In some ways he is a typical teenage boy, trying to resist the mainstream drain.

He emits a sullen vibe in interviews, but his scowl is mainly a fa栤e, hiding a surprising vulnerability that is evident in tracks like “Note to Self” and “Broken.” Jake Bugg does seem to be the real deal, and as he navigates his new-found fame it will be interesting to see how he grows as a songwriter. Who knows, his increasing success might be indicative of a shift in our youth’s musical preference from manufactured, auto-tuned pop to unadulterated folk-rock. As Bugg sings in the second track of the album, “Something is changing, changing, changing.”

Arts & Living

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

‘Trance’ uses Boyle’s strengths TRANCE

continued from page 5

tastic visuals throughout the entire movie. A pulsing soundtrack filled with electronic loops, both of which aid in keeping you locked in with the film — and possibly forgiving some of the plot holes at the time of viewing. One of the most interesting visual aspects of the film are the series of trance sequences that Simon experiences when working with Elizabeth, as Boyle carefully blurs the line between what is trance and what is reality over the film’s progression.

These effects all make “Trance” highly engrossing, but the film’s grip loosens a bit once the film reaches its finale where the twists are literally being piled on by the minute. It’s sufficient to say that things get messy. Very messy.

And while you might leave the theater thinking that you’ll be able to put together the puzzle of the film in the days that follow, there’s a very good chance that you’ll have difficulty lining up all the pieces.

Despite the film not being able to stick the landing in its third act, this flaw shouldn’t detract from “Trace’s” many other merits. As long as you’re willing to accept that the movie isn’t perfect, “Trance” is an enjoyable thriller that is definitely worth a view, if not just to determine for yourself where you will fall on the critical divide.

Courtesy Susie Allnutt / Fox Searchlight Pictures

Rosario Dawson plays hypnotherapist Elizabeth in Danny Boyle’s mesmerizing thriller “Trance.”

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

The Tufts Daily

Advertisement

7

The Tufts Daily

8

THE TUFTS DAILY Martha E. Shanahan Editor-in-Chief

Editorial Nina Goldman Brionna Jimerson Managing Editors Melissa Wang Executive News Editor Jenna Buckle News Editors Lizz Grainger Stephanie Haven Amelie Hecht Victoria Leistman Patrick McGrath Audrey Michael James Pouliot Abigail Feldman Assistant News Editors Daniel Gottfried Xander Landen Justin Rheingold Annabelle Roberts Sarah Zheng Lily Sieradzki Executive Features Editor Jon Cheng Features Editors Hannah Fingerhut Jacob Passy Amelia Quinn Falcon Reese Derek Schlom Charlotte Gilliland Assistant Features Editors Jessica Mow Shannon Vavra

editorial | op-ed

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Relocation of Office of Equal Opportunity unfair, perhaps dangerous choice The Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO), a key institution in addressing problems of sexual assault on campus and providing vital resources, will be moved to a new office at 196 Boston Avenue from its current location at Ballou Hall. The move, which both Director of Public Relations Kimberly Thurler and Director of the OEO Jill Zellmer believe will allow the hiring of additional staff, pushes a hugely significant office for victims of sexual assault and rape to a location intended to be reached by the Boston Avenue shuttle.

By moving this office so far off campus, instead of somewhere on campus that could provide similar amounts of privacy and space for expansion, the administration makes a symbolic decision

that considers the OEO unworthy of a position at the center of the school.

The OEO is a major resource for sexual assault victims on campus. After the elimination of the Sexual Assault Coordinator position last year, an office like the OEO is of singular importance in dealing with a problem that has proven its malicious resilience. The psychological trauma of rape and sexual assault rends the lives of students on college campuses everywhere. Ignoring its significance in this way is unfortunately an all too common occurrence at colleges, a phenomenon in which, sadly, Tufts takes part.

The new location is multiple blocks away from the Medford/Somerville campus. The sensation of walking or taking a shuttle to a far-off corner of

Medford away from campus implies for victims the feeling of being pushed off to the side more than having privacy.

The long march to a drab office is not private — it is lonely, privy to feelings of abandonment from a community that already had, at best, limited sensitivity for victims of rape and sexual assault.

The symbolic power of moving the OEO so far away is such that the administration displays its disconnection from a problem that has a presence that lingers just below the surface, yet, when it comes into discussion, hears platitudes rather than action. If the administration wanted to, if it cared enough to give the energy, it could make room on campus.

This does not, however, appear to be an option — a true shame.

KERAN CHEN

Melissa MacEwen Executive Arts Editor Dan O’Leary Arts Editors Rebecca Santiago Claire Felter Assistant Arts Editors Elizabeth Landers Veronica Little Jacqueline Noack Akshita Vaidyanathan Elayne Stecher Bhushan Deshpande David Kellogg Seth Teleky Peter Sheffer Denise Amisial Jehan Madhani Louie Zong Keran Chen Drew Lewis Nicholas Golden Scott Geldzahler

Executive Op-Ed Editor Op-Ed Editors

Cartoonists

Editorialists

Marcus Budline Executive Sports Editor Alex Baudoin Sports Editors Jake Indursky Kate Klots Ben Kochman Ethan Sturm Andy Wong Sam Gold Assistant Sports Editors Andy Linder Alex Schroeder Claire Sleigh Oliver Porter Sofia Adams Caroline Geiling Nick Pfosi Gabriela Ros Courtney Chiu Clarissa Sosin Zhuangchen Zhou Lane Florsheim Meagan Maher Ashley Seenauth

Executive Photo Editor Photo Editors

Assistant Photo Editors Staff Photographers

Justin McCallum Executive New Media Editors Virginia Bledsoe New Media Editors Jodi Bosin Stephanie Haven Alex Kaufman Mitchell Carey Assistant New Media Editors Jake Hellman

PRODUCTION Sarah Kester

Production Director Adrian Lo Executive Layout Editor Sarah Davis Layout Editors Shoshanna Kahne Alyssa Kutner Daniel MacDonald Elliot Philips Emily Rourke Reid Spagna Emma Arnesty-Good Assistant Layout Editors Sabrina McMillin Montana Miller Falcon Reese Andrew Stephens Chelsea Stevens Lauren Greenberg Emma Arnesty-Good Vidya Srinivasan Adrienne Lange Drew Lewis Patrick McGrath Kyle Allen Evan Balmuth Shreya Bhandari Meredith Braunstein Anna Haugen Jamie Hoagland Grace Hoyt Annaick Miller Emily Naito Tori Porter Julia Russell Marina Shtyrkov

Off the Hill | University of Minnesota

Internet privacy in danger

Executive Copy Editor Senior Copy Editors Copy Editors

by

Ronald Dixon

The Minnesota Daily Assistant Copy Editors

George Brown Executive Online Editor Daniel Kotin Executive Technical Manager

BUSINESS Christine Busaba Executive Business Director Shang Ming Wu Advertising Director Li Liang Receivables Manager P.O. Box 53018, Medford, MA 02155 617 627 3090 FAX 617 627 3910 daily@tuftsdaily.com

Last week, the House passed the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act with mixed support from both Democrats and Republicans.

This piece of legislation should not be passed into law.

What the bill essentially does is grant the government the capacity to share private information that pertains to Internet security with companies. The rules are so broad, however, that they open the floodgates for abuse.

For example, private companies can obtain far more information than they really need. Due to the broad wording of the bill, the data can include personally identifiable information, which is online information that identifies an Internet user, such as banking

The Tufts Daily is a nonprofit, independent newspaper, published Monday through Friday during the academic year, and distributed free to the Tufts community. EDITORIAL POLICY Editorials represent the position of The Tufts Daily. Individual editors are not necessarily responsible for, or in agreement with, the policies and editorials of The Tufts Daily. The content of letters, advertisements, signed columns, cartoons and graphics does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Tufts Daily editorial board.

or social media accounts. Moreover, through the transfer of this data, the companies are not restricted in how they use the information; if they use the information in a questionable manner, the bill would protect them from any criminal liability.

Also, the requests that the companies can make would not require subpoenas or warrants. This means that the right to privacy, an implied right that stems from the Fourth Amendment, would be infringed.

The bill, if passed into law, would be unconstitutional.

Finally, given the fact that the companies would be shielded from any lawsuit that would stem from the apprehension of the data, they could use the information in any way that they choose. If they want to sell the data to advertisement agencies, for

example, nothing would stop them from squeezing money from our personal information. Also, if a hacker steals the data from the company, the companies would not be legally responsible for having an inadequate security mechanism.

Several politicians believe that CISPA is a better alternative to the controversial Stop Online Privacy Act and Protect IP Act bills that died in Congress, but that is far from the truth. As groups from both sides of the political spectrum, from the American Civil Liberties Union to FreedomWorks as well as President Barack Obama, oppose the bill, we find that the idea of protecting basic Internet privacy rights should be near the forefront of legislative priorities.

CISPA, however, runs contrary to the rights of privacy.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Letters must be submitted by 2 p.m. and should be handed into the Daily office or sent to letters@tuftsdaily.com.

All letters must be word processed and include the writer’s name and telephone number. There is a 450-word limit and letters must be verified.

The editors reserve the right to edit letters for clarity, space and length.

ADVERTISING POLICY All advertising copy is subject to the approval of the Editorin-Chief, Executive Board and Executive Business Director. A publication schedule and rate card are available upon request.

The Tufts Daily

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Don’t let Tufts fool you by

Chris Harkins

Despite a recently revised and improved Sexual Misconduct Policy and Adjudication Process, this policy and the less-discussed, yet equally important, Student Judicial Process for all other forms of misconduct need immediate change. In March and May 2012, I was assaulted by my girlfriend’s ex-boyfriend on the Tufts-in-Madrid program. After much discussion with my friends and Tufts administrators, as well as reading the Student Judicial Process handbook multiple times, I filed a complaint against the perpetrator for two counts of assault. On a rainy Friday in September, Dean of Student Affairs Bruce Reitman and Judicial Affairs Officer Veronica Carter convened an evidentiary hearing that functioned as a court case, including opening and closing statements, witnesses and both direct and cross-examinations. Emotions simmered and, at some points, exploded in a tiny conference room in Dowling. It lasted seven hours.

An impartial panel of three administrators and two students who were members of the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Judiciary found the perpetrator guilty of only the first assault and that I had provided insufficient evidence to prove that the second assault occurred. The perpetrator’s punishment: Disciplinary Probation II on his transcript until he graduated and a ban from attending Senior Pub Nights, Spring Fling and Senior Week events. And continuance of a No-Contact Order effective since I had filed the complaint.

The above account is a cut and dry version of what happened. In reality, this case reeked of alcohol, deceit, intentional lying, name-calling, relationship violence and pain — both physical and emotional. I faced an uphill battle against the Office of Judicial Affairs (OJA). Thankfully, they at least seemed interested in my personal safety, but they failed to follow the prescribed written policy according to the Student Judicial Process handbook. In doing so, the OJA actually protected the perpetrator. Here is what really happened: After I filed my complaint on July 12, the perpetrator did not adhere to the mandated time limit for non-sexual assault cases of 48 hours to draft a response. Carter sent me his response 12 days later on July 24.

The judicial handbooks for sexual assault and non-sexual assault both require that the complainant describe in detail, including the context, what transpired. I provided the required details, yet the OJA had me amend my complaint twice because the perpetrator and his lawyer objected to the language and descriptions.

The OJA imposed a strict gag order regarding anything that dealt with the perpetrator’s relationship violence and other assaults he committed against my girlfriend. Although the perpetrator did not stand to answer for other acts of sexual violence and harassment, the lack of context surrounding the assaults in Spain indeed hurt my case. One particular instance of relationship violence committed by the perpetrator related directly to my case, but the panel and convener refused to hear of it. I believe that this piece of information offered a crucial context for what was really happening all throughout my hearing that no one wanted to admit: That this was a case of a violent man who felt victimized by his past relationship and felt he had just cause in hurting and harassing my girlfriend as well as anyone associated with her.

In his response to my complaint, the perpetrator did not deny or offer any version of events that countered my story. On the OJA response form, there are 3 boxes that a respondent can check: complete agreement, partial agreement or complete disagreement with the complainant’s account of

9

Op-Ed

events. The perpetrator checked that he Additional recommendations include: partially agreed with my accounts of the The OJA must incentivize witnesses events. By checking off partial agree- to tell the truth. The OJA should inform ment instead of complete agreement, witnesses that perjury will carry immehe saved his own hide by initiating diate disciplinary punishment. This an evidentiary hearing. An evidentiary will prevent individual witnesses from hearing, as opposed to a sanctioning wrecking entire cases. hearing, requires that I submit evidence Both parties in hearing scenarios and witness testimony to prove my severely lack proper representation. case, while a sanctioning hearing occurs The system compels the complainant when both parties agree as to what and respondent to directly question one transpired, and an impartial panel only another — despite feelings of mutual anidetermines appropriate punishment. mosity, No-Contact Orders and, someMy OJA-trained student advocate (who times, fear. OJA should allow Judicial worked incredibly hard on this case Affairs-trained student advocates (which with me) and I questioned Carter on both of us had present at our hearing) why we had to prove everything, even to act as lawyers during the hearings if though the perpetrator agreed with either party wants this. Too many times, I some of the allegations. She stated that wished my student advocate could counbecause the perpetrator did not specify sel me or even take over questioning in his response the points of agree- when things became too tense and acriment and disagreement, I had to prove monious. However, the current system everything. The OJA refused to have forbids advocates to talk to their clients the perpetrator amend his response in the hearing room. You are left to fend to indicate points of convergence and for yourself. divergence with my account. Thus, the The OJA should allow academic leniOJA allowed him to develop a cover ency for those students who file a comstory that I would not hear until the day plaint. The amount of time and effort one must devote to this process forces the of the hearing three months later.

The night before the hearing, the complainant to take a hit academically. perpetrator broke the No-Contact An OJA student advocate can work with Order between us, yet faced no pen- the professors of his or her client to make alty. The perpetrator’s lawyer called me an arrangement for academic leniency. with the express purpose of intimidat- Finally, the OJA must uphold the integing me into dropping the complaint. I rity of No-Contact Orders and allow surlater learned that the perpetrator had vivors of assault and sexual assault to one of his witnesses obtain my phone obtain one even without filing a comnumber from another student on the plaint. My girlfriend and I fought hard study abroad program. I immediately to obtain a No-Contact Order for herself, called the OJA to report this violation of yet the OJA refused to grant one until the No-Contact Order (which generally she filed a complaint, thereby initiating results in the immediate suspension of a similar hearing process. If a student whoever broke it). I was asked if I was can prove through tangible evidence OK and told to prepare anyway for the (threatening emails, text messages, hospital records) that another student has hearing the next day.

The perpetrator and his witnesses exhibited threatening/violent behavior, tampered with one of my witnesses to the OJA should grant a No-Contact Order flip that witness against me. The OJA for that student’s safety. The OJA’s duty compelled the witness to testify as a requires it to protect students, period — university witness, (in technical terms, not to bargain with a student over his or a witness for neither side). This witness her wellbeing. went on to lie about what happened in I am proud of the case that I built. the first assault, essentially exonerat- Despite the many faults in the curing the perpetrator. Fortunately, I had rent system, I would undergo this proan email exchange between myself and cess again knowing what I know now. this witness proving he lied. I pre- However, students considering filing a sented this email as evidence against complaint should seek help from other the witness’ credibility, and the panel resources on-campus before undergodid not believe that witness’ falsified ing the OJA process. Get involved in Action for Sexual Assault Prevention version of events.

Looking back, according to the (ASAP), the Consent Culture Network Judicial Affairs handbook, I could have or the myriad other groups on camappealed the final verdict of this hear- pus that deal with protecting students. ing based upon procedural errors by ASAP, in particular, under the leadership the OJA. However, appeals must be filed of Kumar Ramanathan, has begun to within 10 days of a hearing. Exhausted, address the incongruities in the current stressed, falling behind in my classes Judicial Affairs processes. Already, posi(for one of which I did accept a W on my tive change has occurred with the TCU transcript), I did not have the energy Senate’s resolution that Tufts hire qualito pursue the matter further. Ten days fied advocates for sexual assault surviis not enough time to file an appeal. vors at Tufts who file a complaint. Within Moreover, if either party obtains new the aforementioned groups, safe spaces evidence even as little as one day after a exist for students who want to confidenhearing, under the current rules the OJA tially discuss these issues and for those would reject the motion for an appeal. students who want to heal as survivors. For the general student population This is unjust and irresponsible.

I am not writing this op-ed as an that has neither thought about Judicial attack upon the character of the indi- Affairs nor faced a serious disciplinary viduals who work at the OJA, nor as a issue, these groups are working for you misguided rant against the respondent. in case something bad does happen, I am writing this op-ed as a demand for and you need help. I believe that Tufts positive change. I believe that the sys- administration cares about its students, tem on paper is decent, but everyone but sometimes it needs us to prod and must follow the rules set in place by remind Tufts of the Office of Judicial both handbooks. The university admin- Affairs’ mission statement: “the poliistrators, specifically Veronica Carter cies of Tufts University are designed to and Dean Reitman, are in a difficult protect your ability to pursue an educaposition. It is their job to protect stu- tion and social life in a reasonable envidents. However, as representatives of ronment.” Now, more than ever, given Tufts University, they must maintain the prevalence of these issues amongst Tufts’ good image, even if that some- other students in this country, whether times comes at the expense of justice. it be Steubenville, Rutgers, Audrie Potts, Too much decision-making power is Angie Epifano’s letter to Amherst or a left in their hands. Tufts should hire an drunk Tufts student assaulting his girladditional administrator to work in the friend, it is time to enact the current OJA so that Carter, Reitman and this policies and improve upon them. third administrator form a unified committee that must vote to decide how to proceed on all judicial matters brought by students. This will institutionalize Chris Harkins is a senior majoring in interinternal cohesion and curb potential national relations. He can be reached at individual biases of administrators.

Christopher.Harkins@tufts.edu.

Walt Laws-MacDonald | Show Me The Money!

Legalize it — and tax it!

A

sense of calm swept over the Tufts campus on Saturday. Surely the end of a 24-hour lockdown played a large role in easing people’s mind, but so did the day’s date: April 20.

Though the date has no official name, 4/20 is essentially “weed day” in cannabis culture, as marijuana users celebrate the illegal — but decriminalized — substance with festivals, rallies, protests and simply chilling on Boston Common.

From San Francisco to Medford, clouds of pungent smoke rose from apartments, houses, dorms, backyards, public places and just about anywhere not directly in the view of police.

Even then, police tend to turn a blind eye on the frowned-upon practice on this day in particular. Why arrest a few hundred college kids on such a beautiful day?

In Colorado and Washington, however, law enforcement doesn’t look the other way — they don’t have to. Voters approved measures to legalize the use of marijuana in small amounts in these states in November following proposals that were closely followed and widely debated nationwide.

Many states, as well as the District of Columbia, have already approved marijuana for medical use, but the substance has remained illegal on the federal level. Since 1970, the Controlled Substances Act has declared that cannabis has a high potential for abuse and no medical use, in direct conflict with the numerous state-level laws that have been passed.

Still, the case for national legalization has picked up strength in recent years, and not just among marijuana smokers. Numerous studies have noted the potential economic benefits — see, it all ties in — to legalizing marijuana, which would allow the government to regulate the drug in the same way it regulates alcohol and tobacco. A Washington state study estimates that legalization would bring in nearly $2 billion in revenue in the next five years, while other studies have claimed that legalization would produce anywhere from $8.7 to $40 billion in federal and state tax revenue every year.

Marijuana legalization would not only generate revenue for our states and country, but it would also cut back on trying and imprisoning non-violent drug users.

Prison overcrowding is a huge problem that has bankrupted numerous cities and states.

Though I hardly think they should be putting offenders back on the streets, states can remove some of these low-level criminals — drug users that have been imprisoned for possession — and maintain order by legalizing marijuana. It would also allow police officers and law enforcement officials to focus on more dangerous drugs, like cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines.

Legalizing marijuana would also mean border-states can control the transportation and distribution of the drug, turning a source of smuggling and crime into one of revenue and regulation. It would also cut off key sources of cash flow for drug cartels that rely on drug traffic to keep their operations afloat.

Of course, the issue is far more complex than I have made it out to be. Though marijuana has been proven to be nonhabit-forming, its use can still have a dangerous — and, in rare cases, life-changing — effect on people. Drug crime would not simply disappear either: A teenager was shot and killed in Colorado on Saturday, and though the incident was chalked up to gang-violence, it does not bode well for the national movement.

As much as I want this to be an economic issue, it is not: it’s a social one. The numbers — billions in revenue and billions more in saved costs — are there. But whether or not the American public will accept “stoners” into everyday life is a very different question.

Walt Laws-MacDonald is a sophomore majoring in quantitative economics. He can be reached at Walt.Laws_MacDonald@ tufts.edu.

Op-ed Policy The Op-Ed section of The Tufts Daily, an open forum for campus editorial commentary, is printed Monday through Thursday. The Daily welcomes submissions from all members of the Tufts community; the opinions expressed in the Op-Ed section do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Daily itself. Opinion articles on campus, national and international issues should be 600 to 1,200 words in length. Op-Ed cartoons are also welcomed for the Campus Canvas feature. All material is subject to editorial discretion and is not guaranteed to appear in the Daily. All material should be submitted to oped@tuftsdaily.com no later than noon on the day prior to the desired day of publication; authors must submit their telephone numbers and day-of availability for editing questions. Submissions may not be published elsewhere prior to their appearance in the Daily, including but not limited to other on- and off-campus newspapers, magazines, blogs and online news websites, as well as Facebook. Republishing of the same piece in a different source is permissible as long as the Daily is credited with originally running the article.

The Tufts Daily

10

Comics

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Doonesbury

Crossword

by

Garry Trudeau

Non Sequitur

Tuesday’s Solution

Married to the Sea

www.marriedtothesea.com

SUDOKU Level: Making sure that 10 is never ten

Late Night at the Daily Tuesday’s Solution

Adrian: “Does that make Marcus a sports Santa?”

Please recycle this Daily

by

Wiley

The Tufts Daily

Wednesday, April 24, 2013 Wanted

-

-

CHILDCARE JOB. Local Tufts alum (close drive to Tufts) seeking responsible, patient, loving, energetic, non-smoking part-time babysitter and/ or nanny. Strong swimmer a plus! Hours and scheduling flexible. Salary commensurate with experience. Please call Faith at (781) 258-9027 for details.

11

Sports -

-

classifieds policy All Tufts students must submit classifieds in person, prepaid with check, money order or exact cash only.

All classifieds submitted by mail must be accompanied by a check. Classifieds are $15 per week or $4 per day with Tufts ID or $30 per week or $8 per day without. The Tufts Daily is not liable for any damages due to typographical errors or misprintings except the cost of the insertion, which is fully refundable. We reserve the right to refuse to print any classifieds which contain obscenity, are of an overly sexual nature or are used expressly to denigrate a person or group. Questions? Email business@tuftsdaily.com.

Men’s Crew

High winds, false starts flummox Jumbos by

Claire Sleigh

Daily Editorial Board

The men’s crew team traveled to Lake Quinsigamond in Worcester, Mass. this Sunday to take on the University of Vermont, Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Skidmore College. The first varsity boat lost to WPI and Vermont, but beat Skidmore in a race that was emblematic of the weekend.

After getting off to a rough start, the Jumbos were unable to control the boat through the choppy conditions and did not row to their full potential, according to associate head coach Anna Lindgren-Streicher.

“I think across all the boats the rowers felt like the race was not representative of what they are capable of,” she said. “What we are practicing for and aiming for is for all the boats to string together a full race that shows their capabilities and shows the work they have put in.”

WPI pulled out a strong lead early on in the first varsity race, and cruised to the finish in a time of 6:05., nine seconds ahead of second-place finisher Vermont. Tufts finished a little over a boat length behind Vermont in a time of 6:19.6 and over 10 seconds ahead of Skidmore.

The team expected to face strong competition from WPI, but hoped to stay even or pull ahead of Vermont. But the Jumbos were at a disadvantage, as many rowers did not understand or hear the starting commands. According to senior captain Kyle Flood, he did not hear the start of the race called, and the team lost a boat length off the start.

“We lost it from the start and never got it back,” Flood said. “We have to push ourselves out of our comfort zones, even if we have a few off strokes.”

Lindgren-Streicher stressed that no matter the conditions of the start, the crew has to pull it back together quickly and concentrate on the race.

“There were some problems with the start, not all the boats knew that they had gone to the quick-start format,” she said. “In any case, it doesn’t have to set you back or make or break the race as long as you handle it well.”

Making the deficit up proved to be a challenge for the Jumbos as they faced the windy conditions on Lake Quinsigamond. A steady tailwind blew throughout the race and created chop on the more open waters. The crew is used to rowing on the sheltered Malden River, which is calm most days.

The second and third varsity eights also faced problems with the wind and

had trouble executing their race plans.

The second varsity eight finished a distant third behind WPI and Vermont, who pulled ahead early in the race. The third varsity eight stuck it out behind Vermont, finishing six seconds behind the Catamounts but almost 25 seconds behind WPI. Lindgren-Streicher was glad her rowers were exposed to the rough conditions at this point in the season, however, as the final events of the spring will be held on the same lake.

“I think that the races gave us a good idea of the work that we need to do over the next two weeks before New England [Rowing Championships],” LindgrenStreicher said. “All three boats walked away with a clear idea of what they need to work on and improve.”

The team is looking forward to the next two weeks of practice to hone their strategies and execution before the New England Rowing Championships on May 4 and the ECAC National Invite Championships on May 12.

First, however, the team turns to their last home race of the season against Wentworth this coming Saturday. Tufts raced Wentworth in their first home meet of the season as well and came away with a confidence booster after strong finishes by all boats.

Courtesy Pat Cordiello

The men’s crew team struggled in the choppy conditions this weekend, with the first boat finishing third.

Player of the Week

Jumbos pick up four NESCAC Player of the Week honors From the diamond to the track, four Jumbos scooped up NESAC awards this week with outstanding performances across the board.

Allyson Fournier Fournier pitched 13 scoreless innings for the softball team, while surrendering just three hits and striking 29 batters out. In her first outing, she pitched relief in a doubleheader against Springfield College, allowing Tufts to walk away with a 4-3 victory in the bottom of the eighth inning. The sophomore sensation also started the Jumbos off on a strong note for the second game in the double-header, posting a 12-strikeout shutout performance.

Fournier capped off the week with a 14-strikeout show to help Tufts win an 11-0 rout of Bridgewater St. The sophomore holds a sensational 14-1 record on the 2013 season and leads the NESCAC in several statistical categories. This week’s honors marked the sixth time that Fournier has been chosen as the conference’s top pitcher.

Andrew David Another Tufts pitcher, freshman Andrew David, also captured NESCAC honors this week following 12 scoreless innings that

-

helped Tufts best UMass-Dartmouth and Colby. David retired 11 batters, and opponents hit just .105 against him in 38 at-bats.

David notched his second collegiate shutout against UMass-Dartmouth and entered as a reliever in the Jumbos’ tilt at Colby, allowing Tufts to defeat the Mules 9-2. This season, David has racked up three complete games and 37 strikeouts on the way to a very solid 4-2 record.

Mitchell Black In a competitive field of 50 runners from all three major collegiate divisions as well as professionals, freshman Mitchell Black finished 21st in the 800 and notched the eighth-best time in Div. III so far this campaign, continuing an excellent first year that has spanned both winter and spring seasons.

Black’s time of 1:52.51 at the Larry Ellis Invitational at Princeton University was an outdoor personal best, and it landed him among the top half of finishers in arguably the highest level of competition he has faced in his Tufts career, highlighted by the victory of two-time NCAA Div. I outdoor 800 champion Robby Andrews, formerly of the University of Virginia.

It was an incredibly tight race, as a mere four and one-half seconds separated Black

from the eventual champion Andrews. Black will probably still have to improve upon his personal-best in order to secure a spot at the Div. III National Championships in May. This week was his first time winning the award.

Matt Johnson Completing the sweep for Tufts men’s track and field, junior Matt Johnson also earned the award for the first time in his career following his dominant performance in the javelin throw at the Eric Loeschner Meet at Fitchburg St. University this past Saturday.

His throw of 182 feet 8 inches put him well ahead of the rest of the field, surpassing the next-best mark by over five feet.

Despite Tufts winning the meet handily, Johnson, also a quarterback on the football team, registered the only individual victory on the day for the Jumbos, earning coach Ethan Barron’s team 10 points and propelling them to victory.

This marks the second consecutive week in which a member of the field squad has earned the NESCAC Performer of the Week designation. Senior Gbola Ajayi won the award last week for a breakout effort in the long jump.

-— by Kate Klots and Sam Gold

Jason Schneiderman | Stoppage Time

L

A biting chance

uis Suarez: he works, he scores, he bites, he dives, he derides and he uses his hands. The Premier League’s secondleading scorer and the most polarizing figure in English soccer was at it again this weekend, making his mark all over Liverpool’s 2-2 draw with Chelsea (and on Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic’s arm).

The Uruguayan striker had a day to remember Sunday afternoon at Anfield. He assisted one goal, received a handball on a Chelsea corner kick leading to Chelsea’s second goal, was incredibly fortunate to not receive a red card for his incident with Ivanovic’s arm and then went on to score the game tying goal in the seventh minute of stoppage time.

But what everyone will remember from this game is not his match-winning ability, his incredible work rate or his overall great play on the field. No, this game will be remembered for Suarez’s moment of madness, in which he very literally bit Ivanovic’s arm. The assault was seemingly unprovoked, and completely inexplicable from the man who is already disliked in many circles for his tendency to dive, and for several other incidents over the past few seasons.

Who could forget his now infamous handball against Ghana in the 2010 FIFA World Cup, in which Suarez received a red card for blocking a sure goal from going into the net by purposefully using his hands. Ghana missed the ensuing penalty kick, and the public outrage ensued, with many saying that Suarez “cheated the game” with his intentional handball.

Or who could forget Suarez’s eight-match ban and £40,000 fine a season ago after being convicted of racially abusing Manchester United defender Patrice Evra.

Or perhaps less memorably, his incident while playing for Dutch club Ajax in 2010, when Suarez bit PSV Eindhoven midfielder Otman Bakkal during an altercation at the end of the match, resulting in a seven-game ban.

So, this past weekend’s incident should not come as much of a surprise to those following Luis Suarez’s career. He is a consistent offender and clearly does not have enough respect for the game. What is incredibly surprising is that no one has stepped in to prevent these events from recurring, especially within his club Liverpool or his coach Brendan Rodgers.

Liverpool FC is arguably the most storied club in English soccer, and for them to have allowed Suarez to tarnish their colors multiple times is shocking. But after the most recent incident, club chairman Ian Ayre made clear that they are going to start working with Suarez.

“I think he felt like he let a lot of people down yesterday,” he said. “We’ll work with Luis — Brendan particularly — on this side of his character in his game. Hopefully that puts the matter to rest from our point of view.”

My question is, why did it take another appalling incident to “work with Luis”? Clearly, he has needed work since the moment he put on the Liverpool red.

Sure, he has been the club’s best and most exciting player since arriving in 2010, but not one of his 38 goals for Liverpool is as memorable as the incidents that have brought him fines and bans.

This has to be Luis Suarez’s last chance with Liverpool. Since a multiple-match ban is likely for biting Ivanovic, Suarez will probably not feature in any more games for Liverpool this season. Brendan Rodgers will thus have the entire offseason to work with his mercurial striker to improve his maturity, and hopefully turn him into the centerpiece around which Liverpool will want to build for the next five years.

If not, Suarez will be forced to take his world class talents elsewhere, because while every club wants a striker of his quality, there aren’t many who want one who dives, who bites and who cheats.

Jason Schneiderman is a sophomore majoring in quantitative economics and computer science. He can be reached at Jason.Schneiderman@tufts.edu.

Sports

12

INSIDE Men’s Crew 11 Player of the Week 11

tuftsdaily.com

Baseball

Jumbos fall in complete game to Salem St. by

Alex Baudoin

Daily Editorial Board

Looking to regain its momentum after dropping two games against Colby last weekend, the Tufts baseball team instead fell short in a nonconference matchup on Monday night against Salem St., losing 2-0.

The Jumbos were unable to match the impressive work of freshman southpaw Sean Buckland, who pitched a complete game, allowing only two hits while striking out five.

Buckland was dominant from the start, consistently getting ahead in the count while throwing a number of different pitches.

“He had three pitches — he was throwing for strikes and they were all good pitches,” junior tri-captain pitcher Christian Sbily said. “He was getting a lot of first-pitch strikes and getting his breaking ball over for strikes, so when you can throw three pitches like that it’s tough to hit for sure.”

“The adjustments were just not made,” junior tri-captain catcher Nick Cutsumpas added. “Credit to him for throwing strikes, but there’s no way he should have shut us out like that. It’s on us. We need to be

more aggressive in fastball hitting counts, and when we get those fastballs we need to stay back and hit them hard the other way.”

Tufts’ only real opportunity to score came in the bottom of the sixth inning. With one out, sophomore center fielder Connor McDavitt singled up the middle and stole second base to put himself into scoring position. Sophomore third baseman Wade Hauser was then hit by a pitch, bringing up sophomore cleanup hitter Bryan Egan with runners on first and second. But the Jumbos were unable to take advantage of the situation, as Egan grounded into an inningending double play.

Despite the quiet bats, the Jumbo pitching staff put together an impressive performance. Sophomore righthander Willie Archibald allowed one earned run over seven innings and classmate Tom Ryan, who leads all pitchers with 13 appearances out of the bullpen, worked his way through two scoreless frames.

With the defeat on Monday, the Jumbos fell to 19-10 on the season.

Despite three consecutive losses, Tufts is still very much alive in the NESCAC East division and finds

itself in a familiar situation entering their series against Bowdoin this weekend. Earlier this season, Coach John Casey’s squad was in a losing skid and managed to overcome its problems to put together an 11-game winning streak. Now, it’s just a matter of regaining that winning formula.

“It starts at practice, just guys coming down enthusiastic, ready to go and not really thinking about what happened this past weekend,” Cutsumpas said. “Yes, you want to use it as motivation, but you don’t want to let it dwell. We know we can do it, we just have to go out there and act.”

The Polar Bears will travel to Medford this weekend sitting atop the NESCAC East division with a 7-2 conference record. Bowdoin is led by 2012 NESCAC Pitcher of the Year senior Oliver Van Zant who has continued his domincance in the 2013 campaign.

Van Zant currently leads the NESCAC with 54 strikeouts over 48 innings and has allowed only six earned runs all season. His younger brother, sophomore Henry Van Zant, is also among the top pitchers in the conference, sitting sec-

Sofia Adams / The Tufts Daily

Freshman outfielder Mike Barry and the Jumbos fell 2-0 to Salem St. on Monday, but have shifted their attention to a series this weekend against Bowdoin. ond in the NESCAC in both innings pitched and strikeouts, while also sporting an excellent 2.47 earned run average.

Last year, Bowdoin swept Tufts in the final NESCAC East series of the season, a series that left the Jumbos without a playoff berth. In order to avoid another letdown, the Jumbos must return to playing their style of baseball.

“The key to the weekend is just going to be playing relaxed,” Cutsumpas said. “We know we

can do it, we’ve showed it. We just have to believe in ourselves and be confident.”

“It’s always difficult in a weekend like this when we know we have to win all three games, but mentally and in terms of our approach to the game, we have to stay in the moment and not worry about later in the game or later in the weekend,” Sbily added.

The first game of this do-or-die series for the Jumbos will begin at 3 p.m. on Friday afternoon.

Women’s crew

Courtesy Pat Cordiello

In both races on Saturday, the first varsity boat for the Jumbos fell on Lake Quinsigamond, while the second varsity boat finished second in the afternoon race.

Jumbos record pair of second-place finishes over weekend by

Tyler Maher

Daily Staff Writer

In their first away meet of the season, the first varsity boat from Tufts women’s crew placed second in both of its races on Lake Quinsigamond in Worcester on Sunday.

“This was the first race of the season where we weren’t on our home course [on the Malden River],” sophomore Zoe Sobin said. “We knew it was going to be a different race than we were used to, but I think we were prepared.”

Though Saturday’s scheduled race against Middlebury was postponed in the wake of last week’s events in Boston, the Jumbos were able to fit in a pair of races on Sunday. In their first race of the day, Tufts finished with a time of 6:53.43 against Skidmore College and William Smith College, finishing second behind William Smith.

“I was satisfied with the results from

our morning race,” Sobin said. “William Smith finished third last year at the NCAAs so, like last weekend with Bates, we were happy to be able to put up a good fight and stick with them the whole way down the course.”

In the afternoon, Tufts again finished second, this time by recording a 6:57.06 time against Clark University and WPI in the Brown Cup. Even though their time was slightly off the morning pace, Sobin felt the Jumbos performed better in their second race.

“We had a much better race techniquewise and felt a lot more stable and powerful than we had in the morning,” she said.

Coach Brian Dawe was equally happy with the team’s results, but at the same time wants to see his team continue to improve as the season progresses.

“We have many goals in each regatta, and I think it’s very important to keep looking to the final race of the final day of the year,” Dawe said. “Losing to the

top-ranked Div. III crews in the country provides an opportunity to improve. The team wants to row the middle part of the race with better technical control. This week we will continue to look at top boat speed, but also try to stretch out the time where we row at cruising speed. Everyone is getting faster.”

The second and third varsity boats, as well as a novice eight and novice four, raced in the morning on Sunday. The second varsity boat botched the start but caught up two boat lengths to come dead even with William Smith. They lost pressure in the second half of the race and fell to the Herons by five seconds.

The third varsity eight and novice eight raced the William Smith novice eight and both lost. The novice four beat Skidmore by 30 seconds but lost to WPI by multiple boat lengths.

The second varsity boat stayed on into the afternoon on Sunday to compete in the same event as the first varsity boat

against WPI. In a six-lane race that included the first varsity boats from WPI, Clark and Tufts and the second and third varsity boats from WPI, the Tufts 2V came in third behind the Tufts 1V. Although all of the races went at the same time, each was ranked individually, and the boat-length lead that the second varsity held over WPI’s 2V represented the only Tufts win of the day.

Tufts will race Wellesley, Simmons and Smith in their next meet on Saturday.

Though Wellesley’s renowned crew program figures to pose a formidable challenge, Sobin believes Tufts will be up to the task come Saturday.

“Wellesley is a very strong crew, so we are hoping to do the best we can and let all the work we’ve put in speak for us,” she said. “As we look towards the end of the season and championships, we hope to continue to gain speed and keep showing that Tufts is a crew to look out for this season as well as in the future.”