Richardson Memorial Hall Charrette Presentation

TULANE

RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE 22-23 MARCH 2011

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

INTRODUCTION

A Vision for the Future of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

INTRODUCTION

CHARRETTE

TULANE UNIVERSITY RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL

Agenda: Day 1

March 22nd-23rd 2011 Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201

Day 1: March 22nd, 2011

1 Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm 12:00-12:10

Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE

Introduction

12:10-12:20

Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell

Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives

12:20-12:35

FXFOWLE / el dorado

Occupancy/Survey

12:35-12:50 12:50-1:05

el dorado/SGH

Architecture

FXFOWLE/ Andropogon

Site and Campus Relationships

1:05-1:30 1:30-1:50

Transsolar/SGH

Climate Analysis & Passive Design

Altieri/FXFOWLE

Systems

1:50-2:00

FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities

Operations and Metrics

2 Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm 3 Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm 4 Break 3:45-4:00 pm 5 Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm 6 Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm 7 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Day 2: March 23rd, 2011 RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

INTRODUCTION

3 Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm

Agenda: Day 2 4

Break 3:45-4:00 pm

5 Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm 6 Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm 7 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Day 2: March 23rd, 2011

8 Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am 9 Break 10:15-10:30 am 10 Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am 11 Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm 12 Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall) Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm TGIW 5:00 pm Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

INTRODUCTION

Agenda: Workgroups & Topics

group 1

group 2

group 3

group 4

group 5

Dan Maginn

Pete Pesce

Steve Salzer

Ilana Judah

TUES

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

TUES

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

WED

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

WED

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

2:30-3:45

4:00-5:15

9:00-10:15

10:30-11:45

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Guy Geier

F XFOWLE

INTRODUCTION

Presenters TULANE

Kenneth Schwartz, Dean

Collette Creppell, University Architect Liz Davey, Office of Environmental Affairs

FXFOWLE Guy Geier, FAIA, FIIDA, LEED Peter Pesce, AIA Ilana Judah, Int’l Assoc. AIA, LEED

Dan Maginn, AIA Steve Salzer, AIA

AltieriSeborWieber LLC Philip C. Steiner, P.E.

TRANSSOLAR Erik Olsen, P.E.

Sean O’Brien, P.E., LEED AP Yaki Miodovnik, RLA, ASLA, CSLA RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

campus environmental initiatives

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals

Analyzing Tulane’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Waste Commute 0.6% 7.4% Travel 25.5%

Study Abroad 1.3%

Fleet 0.9%

Buildings 64.3%

2009 Emissions by Sector RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals

Tulane GHG Emissions (MTC02e) Emissions by Scope 160,000 140,000 120,000

52,796

59,510 59,951

62,579

100,000 Total Scope 3

80,000 60,000

Total Scope 2 77,620

68,568

63,765

64,232

21,082

20,243

17,537

2006

2007

2008

Total Scope 1

40,000 20,000 23,956

‐

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

2009

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals

Emissions per student and sq. foot Normalized Emissions 2006

Full Time Enrollment (FTE) Per Capita Emissions (MTCO2e/FTE)

Total Building Area (sq. feet) Emissions Per 1000 sq. Feet (MTCO2e/1000 sq. Feet)

2007

2008

ACUPCC Average

2009

9,704

9,642

10,091

10,695

15.61

14.93

14.31

14.21

7.96

6,713,508 6,746,734 7,038,007 7,156,328 22.57

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

21.34

20.51

21.23

19.94

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals

Emission Reduction “Wedges” 160,000

140,000

120,000

100,000 External Actions Measures during 2015‐2020

80,000

Measures during 2010‐2015 Measures Underway

60,000

Total emissions

40,000

20,000

0 2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Recycling

A Recycling Snapshot: Uptown Campus RecycleMania Results • In February 2011. . .

Garbage: 52‐57 tons/ week Recycling: 6‐10 tons/week Recycling Diversion Rate: 10‐18% • Tulanians can recycle all paper, cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminum & metal cans on the uptown campus.

• Recycling services also provided for office electronics, laser and ink jet cartridges, and residence hall move‐out (clothes, household items, food, books, Mardi Gras beads).

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Green Building Initiatives & Projects 1990’s

Early Initiatives

Timeline

Pre-Katrina

Post-Katrina

a

a

2011 -

C Current t IInitiatives iti ti

o Wall Residential College

 Recycling Program

o Hertz Family Practice Facility

o Alcee Fortier

o Lavin Bernick Center for

o McAlister Place

o J. Bennett Johnson Labs

o Willow Residences

y Life University

 LEED Standards

o Broad Street Health Clinic

o Israel Building

- Building Commissioning

o Richardson Memorial Sustainable Strategies

- Energy Modeling - Revit  Energy gy Retrofits/ Conservation

o Dinwiddie Hall o Residential College II

* BLDG PHOTO 1

BLDG PHOTO 2

BLDG PHOTO 3

BLDG PHOTO 4

BLDG PHOTO 5

BLDG PHOTO 6

BLDG PHOTO 7

BLDG PHOTO 8

BLDG PHOTO 9

BLDG PHOTO 10

• Member of U.S. Green Building Council – since 2007 • Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) – since 2008 • American College & University President’s Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) – since 2008

* TSA Prototype House #4 – LEED Silver with two more houses completed or in progress RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

BLDG PHOTO 11

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Green Building Initiatives & Projects

Dinwiddie Hall College II Features: o re-using existing building o recycling building materials o maximizing daylight and daylight harvesting o 76% solid waste recycled

Energy Usage:

Residential College II Features: o lighting and HVAC controls by motion sensor o maximized daylighting and

Hertz Family Practice Facility Features: o low flow showers and low flush plumbing fixtures o Solar ready

views i o louvered sun shades

Energy Usage:

Energy Usage:

o estimated to use 17.9% less

o energy usage of the

o energy usage in the design is

energy for 14.3% savings which

mechanical systems is

estimated to use 36% less

translates to $14,468/year

estimated to use 21% less

energy than baseline design

energy than baseline design Tracking LEED High Silver/Gold

T ki LEED Silver/Gold Tracking Sil /G ld

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

T ki LEED High Tracking Hi h Gold/Platinum G ld/Pl ti

F XFOWLE

Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES

Green Building Initiatives & Projects THE COST OF LEED

SUSTAINABILITY BENEFITS

SUSTAINABLE TULANE, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY

 

2% - 3% Silver/Gold 4% - 6% Platinum

SAVING MONEY (Financial) 



FIRST COST VS. LIFECYCLE SAVINGS Cost Recovery Time:  For university it might be 5 5-15 15 years  For businesses it might be 3-5 years COMMISSIONING & ENERGY MODELING (most payback)

Cost Recovered by : Lower risk Higher energy efficiency  Knowing the building and operations before it is opens  

URBANbuild GREENbuild City Center Center for Public Service: Samuel Green edible school yard Green Light NOLA Priestly Charter School for Construction Center for Bio-Environmental Research Campus Sustainability Report Card A- (2010)

SAVING THE PLANET (Environmental) (E i t l)   

Lower energy use Lower water use Less site disturbance

HEALTHY BUILDING/ HEALTHY PEOPLE     

Improved health Higher productivity Reduced absenteeism Lower healthcare costs General wellbeing

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

occupancy & program

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

RESPONDENTS

135 28 4 =

faculty admin/ other distribution of years at RMH

SPACE USAGE

83% 45% 20%

students

16.5%

studio as primary work space classroom as secondary work space other secondary space (dorm, computer lab, etc) library as secondary work space

WEEKLY HOURS

52.5% 41% 60% 46% 63%

11-30 hours in primary work space > 30 hours in primary work space 10 hours or less in secondary space > 40 hours in RMH most time spent during day

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

GENERAL BUILDING / PRIMARY WORKSPACE SATISFACTION

41-42% 26% 32-33%

satisfied neutral dissatisfied

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

72%

conditions interfere with their work

BEST FEATURES

Daylight

ADEQUATE FEATURES

Acoustics Audio Visual

INADEQUATE FEATURES

Information Technology

Indoor Air Quality

Artificial Lighting

Information Technology

Storage

VERY INADEQUATE FEATURES

Thermal Comfort

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

BEST COMMON SPACES

Studios Library

ADEQUATE COMMON SPACES

Outdoor spaces Shop Digital output shop Classrooms

INADEQUATE COMMON SPACES

Computer Labs Pin up / Jury Drawing Board Cafe

TOP FAVORITE SPACES

Lobby Library Studios Entry porch/ outdoors

TOP LEAST FAVORITE SPACES

Computer Lab Offices/ Ground Floor Drawing Board Cafe Classrooms 204 & 404

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

STUDIOS - SPACE

68%

64% 73%

More space for group work More space for storage More comfortable furniture

STUDIOS - THERMAL COMFORT

66% Dissatisfied Comments-

STUDIOS - LIGHT

78%

35%

62.5%

Comments-

Too cold in cold weather Mixed issues in hot weather Problematic at all times of day Humidity problem in hot weather Need for personal control Many windows are not operable

Satisfied with natural light Dissatisfied with artificial light No task lights Need for lighting controls Blinds/ shades for glare Poor quality artificial light

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

STUDIOS - ACOUSTICS

Mixed Satisfaction

Comments-

Loud window AC units Hard reflective surfaces Loyola Physical plant noise Group / professor meetings Lack of separations Student culture

STUDIOS - USE

50%

45%

11-20 hours on weekdays outside class 11-20 hours on weekends outside class

Would use

more if....

Improved thermal comfort

More comfortable furniture

Computers integrated in studios

Lounge/ rest/ sleeping areas

Food preparation/ kitchen space

Acoustic control

Proximity/ transportation to residence

ALTERNATIVES TO STUDIO USE

35% Library

44% Computer lab

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

OFFICES - USE

80%

use as primary work space 11-30 hours

OFFICES - SATISFACTION

65% Satisfied with amount of daylight

60% Dissatisfied with amount of space

60% Dissatisfied with comfort of furniture

62% Dissatisfied with air quality

69-72% Dissatisfied with temperature

Comments-

Humidity - problem for books Mold Variations in temperature Air infiltration through windows Lack of controls/ blinds No natural ventilation/ operable windows Shop needs to be acoustically insulated Noise from corridor due to air return Visual privacy from exterior

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

CLASSROOMS - FAVORITES

201, 202, 204 301, 305 405

CLASSROOMS - LEAST FAVORITE

201, 204 (temperature issues)

404, 405, 407/409

404 worst overall

Furniture rated poorly in many rooms

Comments- Shades/ shutters insufficient for glare

Furniture comfort/ lack writing space

Poor Acoustics/ AV (internal/external)

Poor thermal comfort/ controls

Poor artificial lights/ controls

Noise from Loyola

Need business school style classrooms

PIN-UP/ JURY SPACES

36-57%

Comments-

Dissatisfied with quality, quantity, visibility and access Poor lighting Too public/ lacks intimacy/ acoustic issues Need to incorporate use of technology

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

LIBRARY

66% 66-75%

use 1-5 hours per week temperature comfortable

Open longer/ at night More computers/ software/ outlets More up to date resources Better seating/ furniture

Would use

more if....

COMPUTER LAB

Mixed

Importance

75% 68% 68% 50%

dissatisfied with air quality dissatisfied with space available dissatisfied with lack of daylight dissatisfied with number of computers

79% 51%

rate as useful use 1-2 per week

Issues of heat, odor, cleanliness

More distribution throughout RMH

DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB

Needs better management

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

SHOP

90%

use between once per month and never

Issues of lack of space and air quality

Needs longer/ weekend hours

Acoustic control to adjacent spaces

DRAWING BOARD CAFE

44%

use 1-2 per week

Would use

more if....

Open longer/ at night

More ambiance/ daylight

Better quality food

Better air quality/ odors

Access to exterior space

OUTDOOR SPACES

Mixed Importance

Not enough opportunity to go outdoors

Ideas...

Outdoor sheltered classroom Outdoor pinup/ sketching areas Covered space for full scale experiments Bike Lockers Tables & chairs to replace platforms

SECURITY

Most

Feel their person and property is secure

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Occupant IEQ and Program Survey

IMPORTANT ITEMS AND DREAMS FOR THE FUTURE...

Better recycling!

Building as teaching tool

“Combining a high tech approach to environmental systems with enhancing the historic elements of the building structure.”

Strong connection between inside and outside

High quality Computer Lab

“The building could be a place for the city. It can signify the new outlook of the city.

A role model for the city. It can create interaction between the different studios.”

Outdoor Classrooms/ Seating Technologically advanced lighting and controls system

“Passive ventilation in the spring and fall.

Zones for controlling a Living Building.”

Modern and innovative within Historic Facade

Lounge/ Nap Areas RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Program

MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES STUDIOS

45%

IMPROVE STUDIO EXPERIENCE / STUDIO CULTURE CREATE RANGE OF PIN-UP SPACES, BOTH FLEXIBLE AND FIXED EXPLORE COMPUTER LABS WITHIN STUDIOS EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE FLOORS

CLASSROOMS

18%

ESTABLISH INTERMEDIATE-SIZED CLASSROOM(S)

OFFICES

15%

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

IMPROVE ADMIN OFFICE LAYOUT IMPROVE BUILDING RECEPTION SEQUENCE IMPROVE FACULTY OFFICING AREAS EXPAND / IMPROVE TRUDC / CITY CENTER / URBANBUILD OFFICES

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Program

MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES RESEARCH / LIBRARY FUNCTIONS

10% SHOP

3%

PINUP

3%

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

EMBRACE CURRENT / PREDICTED TRENDS IN LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTS CONSIDER RELATIONSHIP TO CAFE ESTABLISH A CURATED ARCHITECTURE GALLERY EXTEND HOURS OF OPERATION EXPAND AND IMPROVE SHOP TO INCLUDE CAPABILITIES BEYOND WOOD

EXPLORE DEDICATED AREAS FOR SMALL / MEDIUM / LARGE CRITS

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Program

MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES DRAWING BOARD CAFE

2%

IMPROVE CAFE EXPERIENCE EXPLORE POTENTIAL OF CAFE AS PART OF LEARNING COMMONS

COMPUTER LAB

2%

EXPLORE DE-CENTRALIZED COMPUTER LAB LOCATIONS

DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB

1%

EXPLORE SEPARATING DIGITAL IMAGING FROM 3D FAB EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE LEVELS

RESTROOMS

1%

INCREASE NUMBER OF FIXTURES IN BUILDING PER CODE

EXTERIOR AREAS

EXPLORE SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE FEATURES IMPROVE EXTERIOR AMENITIES (SEATING, BIKE PARKING, ETC)

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN

R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE

310 OFFICE

3PS2 LOBBY

EXT. STAIR

3STW3

304 OFFICE 304A STORAGE (316) UP DN

301 CLASSROOM

3STW4

ELEV

EXT. STAIR

308 OFFICE

UP 3STW1

3STW2

DN

3PS1 LOBBY

303B OFFICE

303 OFFICE

303A OFFICE

302 CLASSROOM

305 CLASSROOM

5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS

LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 7 AM TO 1 PM

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN

R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE

310 OFFICE

3PS2 LOBBY

EXT. STAIR

3STW3

304 OFFICE

301 CLASSROOM

304A STORAGE (316) UP DN

3STW4

ELEV

EXT. STAIR

308 OFFICE

UP 3STW1

3STW2

DN

3PS1 LOBBY

303B OFFICE

303 OFFICE

303A OFFICE

302 CLASSROOM

305 CLASSROOM

5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS

LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 1 PM TO 7 PM

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN

R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE

310 OFFICE

3PS2 LOBBY

EXT. STAIR

3STW3

304 OFFICE

301 CLASSROOM

304A STORAGE (316) UP DN

3STW4

ELEV

EXT. STAIR

308 OFFICE

UP 3STW1

3STW2

DN

3PS1 LOBBY

303B OFFICE

303 OFFICE

303A OFFICE

302 CLASSROOM

305 CLASSROOM

5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS

LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 7 PM TO 1 AM

F XFOWLE

OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM

Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN

R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE

310 OFFICE

3PS2 LOBBY

EXT. STAIR

3STW3

304 OFFICE

301 CLASSROOM

304A STORAGE (316) UP DN

3STW4

ELEV

EXT. STAIR

308 OFFICE

UP 3STW1

3STW2

DN

3PS1 LOBBY

303B OFFICE

303 OFFICE

303A OFFICE

302 CLASSROOM

305 CLASSROOM

5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS

LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 1 AM TO 7 AM

F XFOWLE

architecture

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

A History of Richardson Memorial Hall

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use

Existing Conditions

Existing Conditions • Solid masonry / load bearing walls • Single glazed / wood windows with minimal shading • Wood/steel framed roof; slate & terracotta

Construction style is more typical of northern climates than warm/humid locations with high solar gains

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use

Existing Conditions Windows

• Some deterioration – restoration likely possible • Poor thermal performance • High solar heat gain

Walls

• Extremely durable construction • Poor thermal performance • Some exterior restoration needed

Roofs • Durable wearing materials

• Staining potential due to shading patterns • Localized repairs/restoration may be required RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Building Codes

PRELIMINARY CODE ANALYSIS CODE: IBC 2006 (2009 PENDING); NFPA 101 WILL APPLY (MORE STRINGENT) EGRESS: TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED. EGRESS STAIRS TO BE ENCLOSED (OR CODE COMPLIANT EXTERIOR) ATRIUMS: ATRIUM SPACES LIMITED TO TWO CONNECTED STORIES, THEREFORE A FIRE BARRIER MUST BE ESTABLISHED AT THE THIRD LEVEL FLOOR AND AT THE FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR. EXISTING STAIRS: CAN REMAIN AS NON-REQUIRED "CONVENIENCE STAIRS" EXIT CORRIDORS: BECAUSE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED, THEY CAN BE NON RATED ADA: BUILDING MUST BE MADE FULLY COMPLIANT RESTROOMS: THERE WILL BE A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN TOILET FIXTURES, INCLUDING ADA.

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Egress

N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR

E G R E SS ZO NE

E G R E SS ZO NE

E X T . S T A IR R 3002W W O ME N

R 3001M ME N 306 O F F IC E

E LE V

E X T . S T A IR

308 O F F IC E

310 O F F IC E

3P S 2 LO BBY

E X T . S T A IR

301 C LASSR O O M

X

M IN .

=X /3

3S T W 4

3S T W 3

304 O F F IC E 304A S TO R AG E ( 316 )

UP UP DN

3S T W 1

3S T W 2

DN

3P S 1 LO BBY

303B O F F IC E

303 O F F IC E

303A O F F IC E

3 =X / .

N I M

X

302 C LASSR O O M

305 C LASSR O O M

O P E N A T R IU M IS S U E

LE V E L TH R E E F LO O R P LAN

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Egress

N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR T O 3

E L IM IN A T E S T A IR T O 5 E G R E SS ZO NE

E G R E SS ZO NE

E X T . S T A IR

M 4 001 ME C H .

4S T W 2 S T A IR 4E L E V 1 E LE V

E X T . S T A IR

401 C LASSR O O M

X

M IN .

4P S 1 LO BBY

DN

DN 404 C LASSR O O M

=X /3

E X T . S T A IR

3 =X / .

N I M

UP 4C R D 1 C O R R ID O R

4S T W 1 S T A IR

403 O F F IC E

405 C LASSR O O M

407?

C LASSR O O M?

X

402 C LASSR O O M

411 O F F IC E

E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 5

C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U N S E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R

LE V E L F O U R F LO O R P LAN

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Egress

E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 4

C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U N S E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R

E G R E SS ZO NE B E L O W

E X T . S T A IR

TO E G R E S S BELOW

( o p e n to flo o r b e lo w)

5P S 1 LO BBY

DN 5C R D 1 C O R R ID O R

E LE V

C H ASE ?

C H ASE ?

502 D E S IG N L A B

503 D E S IG N L A B

( o p e n to flo o r b e lo w)

501 S T U D IO C H ASE ?

C H ASE ?

E L IM IN A T E S T A IR

L E V E L F IV E F L O O R P L A N

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Egress

N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR

E G R E SS ZO NE

E G R E SS ZO NE

E X T . S T A IR

M 2 001 ME C H .

204 C LASSR O O M E X T . S T A IR

2P S 2 LO BBY

X 201 L E C TU R E

201A C LO SE T

M IN . = X / 3

2C L S 1

201B K IT C H E N

E X T . S T A IR

206 S L ID E L IB R A R Y

2C L S 2 C L O S E T

E LE V

206A S L ID E L IB R A R Y UP

S T A IR

DN

DN

M IN .= X / 3

X

202 L IB R A R Y

UP 2P S 1 LO BBY

V E S T IB U L E DN

DN

DN

N O N - C O M P L IA N T G U A R D R A IL IS S U E

LE V E L TW O F LO O R P LAN

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

ARCHITECTURE

Egress

N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR

P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N

P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N

E G R E SS ZO NE A B O V E

E G R E SS ZO NE A B O V E

E X T . S T A IR

102 S TO R AG E

E LE V. ME C H .

E LE V.

E XT. S T A IR

1P S 2 E L. LO BBY

R 1001W W O ME N R 1002M ME N

M 1 003 M E C H A N IC A L

104 D IG IT A L O U TP U T LAB

E XT. S T A IR

M 1 001 ME C H .

110A O F F IC E 110 SHOP

P 1002 C H ASE

1C L S 1

E 1001 E LE C T. 1C L S 2 1H W 1 H ALL

J1001 JA N IT O R

M 1 004 ME C H .

M 1 002 ME C H .

114A O F F IC E

116A O F F IC E

114B O F F IC E

116B O F F IC E

118 O F F IC E

120 O F F IC E

122 S TO R AG E

S T A IR 1C R D 1 C O R R ID O R

119 O F F IC E

117 O F F IC E

115 O F F IC E

113 O F F IC E

111 O F F IC E

109 O F F IC E

107 O F F IC E

105 O F F IC E

101 F A C U L T Y O P E R A T IO N S

101A ME C H .

UP

1C R D 2 C O R R ID O R UP

103 D R A W IN G B O A R D C A F E

J1002

121 O F F IC E

1P S 1 LO BBY

123 O F F IC E

125 O F F IC E

127 O F F IC E

129 O F F IC E

131 C LASSR O O M

131A P R IN T S H O P

K IT C H E N

UP

P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N

LE V E L O NE F LO O R P LAN

N

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

site & campus relationships

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

site & campus relationships

Access and Transportation

Streets

Streets

Shuttle Drop Off Location

Streetcar Stop

Shuttle Route

Bus Stop

Shuttle/ Streetcar 105 spaces

58 spaces

101 spaces Service Route

Parking RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Service F XFOWLE

site & campus relationships

Access and Transportation

Major Path

Bike Path

Minor path

Bike Path

Pedestrian Circulation 2010 Commuting Survey Uptown Results Students Personal Vehicle Carpool Streetcar Bus Walking and Biking Respondents

Faculty 34.10% 2.60% 0% 1.90% 61.50% 61

Staff 50.80% 4.80% 2.10% 0.50% 32.80% 39

74.80% 6% 1.10% 0.80% 13.70% 111

Campus Commuting RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

site & campus relationships

Site Plan

Stallings Hall

West Road Parking Garage

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING ROAD property line

Dinwiddie Hall

Richardson Memorial Hall

Richardson Building

Gibson Quad 30

0

15

30

60

Gibson Hall

120 ft.

n RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

site & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS

Exterior Opportunities

c

b

d

a e

f

n RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

site & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS

Storms and Climate Change FEMA Advisory Base Flood Elevation (2006)

3 feet above Highest Existing Adjacent Grade Existing ground floor is below HEAG+3’ Land sinking + sea level rise in Gulf of Mexico resulted in “relative sea-level rise” of three feet over past 100 years

POTENTIAL STRATEGIES

Protection

Site grading Improved ventilation Dehumidification (high energy demand) Infrastructure improvements

Resistance

Mold resistant Materials Natural - Select woods, ceramic tile, porcelain, rubber Engineered - Fiberglass covered drywall, insulation, paints, coatings

Passive collection/ containment

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

ABFE 3 ft above HEAG

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Natural Systems: Eco-Region

Southern Holocene Meander Belts • • •

•

Drains all or parts of 31 States, 2 Canadian Provences (over 1,000,000 square miles) into the Gulf of Mexico.

Critical wildlife habitat includies the largest continuous system of wetlands in North America.

Levees have separated much of the Mississippi from its natural hydrologic system contributing to a decrease of sediment mobilization and altering the natural delta formation leading to habitat loss.

Point bars, depositional features along the inside of stream beds, were originally occupied by diverse forests of cottonwood, sugarberry, sycamore, green ash, and pecan. Drier sides of the flood plain are marked by willow oak, water oak, swamp chestnut oak, and cherrybark oak. Also common in the southern region are live oak, Spanish moss, and laurel oak.

Bottomland Deciduous Forest Vegetation

Eco-Region Map

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Natural Sytems: Geology and Physiography Holocene Geology and Physiography of New Orleans idge

•

ly R entil G e i r i Meta

•

Levee Flank Depression

•

Mississippi River levees form the high ground derived from alluvial deposits underlain by sands. Typically gray and brown silts, silty clay, and some very fine sands.

The Mid-town area between the Mississippi and Metairie Ridge was an enclosed depression known as a “levee flank depression” The campus is situated on the border between the alluvial deposits and the depression.

The site is underlain by the Pleistocene age Prairie formation. This unit dips down beneath the city and is generally encountered at depths greater than 40 feet.

Richardson Hall

Tulane University

Point Bar Alluvial Deposits elevation 40 - 45 35 - 40 30 - 35 25 - 30 20 - 25 15 - 20

Mississippi River

10 - 15 5 - 10 0-5 -4 - 0 -9 - -5 -14 - -10 -19 - -15 -24 - -20 -28 - -25

0

Feet 2,000

Physiography Map

Geology Sections

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Natural Systems: Hydrology 17th Street Ca

nal

To Lake Pontchartrain

Hydrology •

•

•

Campus drains away from the Mississippi River, eventually towards the 17th Canal and into Lake Ponchartrain Combined Sewer System modifies the natural hydrologic pattern, draining eastward towards Mississippi River Gulf Outlet Tulane University was on the border of the Katrina flood extents due to its elevated location on the natural levee.

Flooding was minimal north of Freret Street including the historic quad.

500-year flood zone

100-year flood zone

flood zone 100-year 500-year

0

Feet 2,800

Flood Zone Map

Mississippi River Gulf Outlet

elevation (msl) -28 - -20 -19 - -10 -9 - 0 0 - 10

The Sewage Collection System

10 - 20 20 - 30 30 - 40 40 - 50

0

Feet 2,500

Natural Hydrology Pattern

Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans

Modified Hydrologic Pattern- Wastewater

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

http://swbnola.org

Katrina Flood Map

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Average Monthly Precipitation (in) Natural Systems: Water Resource

Water Reuse •

8 6

•

4

•

2 0 Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

•

Dec

Richardson Hall could collect an average of 4000-6000 cu. ft. of rainwater per month.

Irrigates approximately 0.5 acres, assuming 1” per week.

Would require a theoretical cistern 14’ diamter and 40’ tall. for storage. (7000 cu. ft) Irrigation for the entire Quad would require 10x this amount

Rainfall Pattern (average inches per month)

Roof Collection

Roof Garden

Storage Cisterns

Roof Garden

11,600 sq. ft.

Quad Area for Irrigation

Roof Garden

Roof Garden

Rooftop Collection (cu. ft.)

RooftopPotential Collection withRainwater surrounding RoofVolume Gardens

0

50’

7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Rooftop Collection Volume (average cu. ft. per month) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Natural Systems: Soils

Sk

Cm, Cancienne silt loam (south campus) and,

NRCS Soil Types CS, Cancienne and Schriever soils, frequently flooded Cm, Cancienne silt loam

Ha

Co, Cancienne silty clay loam Ha, Harahan clay LV, Levees-Borrow pits complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes

CS

Sk, Schriever clay

Soil Conditions •

Co

• LV

Ub, Urban land W, Water

0

Feet 2,000

• Cm

Sk

•

Highly productive, found on natural levees. Consists of silty alluvium, depth to root restrictive layer > 60 in.

Somewhat poorly drained, moderately high movement in restrictive layer. Low shrink-swell potential. (subsidence) High water table at 1.4 to 4 feet below the surface. Construction limitations are moderate Southern hardwoods such as green ash, cottonwood, oaks, and sweetgum.

Sk, Schriever clay (north campus) • CS

Cm

•

Ub

•

Soils Map •

Subsidence Map

Found in backswamps. Consists of clayey alluvium, depth to root restrictive layer > 60 in.

Poorly drained hydric soil. Low water movement in the most restrictive layer. Very high shrink-swell potential. Severe construction limitations. (subsidence) High water table at 12 inches. Surface layer is very dark gray clay to 10 inches.

Subsoils are dark gray clay.

Fairly productive soil suitable for bermudagrass, dallisgrass, tall fescue and white clover. Good for tree species adapted to wet clay soils.

Compaction

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Existing

n

w

s e

Key Plan

Richardson Memorial Building

View West (w) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

View South (s)

View North (n)

View East (e)

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Spatial Quality and Characteristics Goals • • • • • •

Pedestrian Connection

Building Entrances/ Forecourt

University Boundary

Quad/ Green

Organization/ Hierarchy of Spaces Organization/ Hierarchy of path systems Gateways for Wayfinding Forecourts to celebrate entrances Outdoor gathering spaces Identify property and preserve campus identity

Social Gathering Spaces

Gathering Spaces

Material Use

Gateway

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Active Open Space

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Tree Cover Cypress

Live oak

Magnolia

Cherry

Cypress Shade Tree Understory Tree Gibson Quad Tree Cover Plan

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Bamboo

Richardson Building Tree Cover

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Hardscape Materials

Limestone Concrete Stepping Stones Concrete Walk

Richardson Building Hardscape

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Material Recycle

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Infrastructure

Water Sewer Telecommunications Down Spout Sump Pump

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

SITE & campus relationships

Site Conditions: Site Furnishings

Light Fixture

Bike Racks

Benches

Bike Rack/ Tables RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Table/ Trash Receptacle

F XFOWLE

climate analysis & passive design

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Thermal Comfort Factors

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Thermal Comfort: Indoor Operative and Outdoor Air Temperatures

Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature 째C

Comfort: Naturally ventilated spaces

Indoor Operative Temperature 째F

N e w O rle a n s

Indoor Operative Temperature 째C

Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature 째F

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity

Outside Air Temperature [째F]

Outside Air Temperature [째F]

100

Absolute Humidity [g/kg]

80

60

50

40

Natural Ventilation 60

30

40

20

20

0

Natural Ventilation

10

0

01 Jan 0:00 31 Jan 10:00 02 Mar 20:00 02 Apr 6:00 02 May 16:00 02 Jun 2:00 02 Jul 12:00 01 Aug 22:00 01 Sep 8:00 01 Oct 18:00 01 Nov 4:00 01 Dec 14:00 01 Jan 0:00

Ambsolute Humidity [g/kg]

120

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Winter Week Outside Air Temperature [°F] Absolute Humidity [‰]

80 70

50 40 30 20

Cold day

Mild day

23 Dec 0:00

22 Dec 12:00

22 Dec 0:00

21 Dec 12:00

21 Dec 0:00

20 Dec 12:00

20 Dec 0:00

19 Dec 12:00

19 Dec 0:00

18 Dec 12:00

18 Dec 0:00

0

17 Dec 12:00

10

17 Dec 0:00

Outside Air Temperature [°F]

60

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Autumn Week Outside Air Temperature [°F] Absolute Humidity [‰]

90 80

60 50 40 30 20

Mild day

Mild day

20 Oct 0:00

19 Oct 12:00

19 Oct 0:00

18 Oct 12:00

18 Oct 0:00

17 Oct 12:00

17 Oct 0:00

16 Oct 12:00

16 Oct 0:00

15 Oct 12:00

15 Oct 0:00

0

14 Oct 12:00

10

14 Oct 0:00

Outside Air Temperature [°F]

70

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Thermal Comfort Ranges 25 100 %

24H/D

80%

60%

Operation Time 8h - 20h

Humidity Ratio [‰]

20

40%

15

10 20%

Extended indoor comfort range

5

ASHRAE winter indoor comfort range

ASHRAE summer indoor comfort range

0 25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Outdoor Air Temperature [°F]

Comfort: Mechanically ventilated spaces

75

80

85

90

95

100

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Outside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <10 g/kg Natural Ventilation: 44% of occupied hours 500

400

300

200

100

0 24

28

32

36

40

44

48

Occupied hours: 8am â&#x20AC;&#x201C; midnight

52

56

60

64

68

72

76

80

84

88

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Outside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <14 g/kg Natural Ventilation: 63% of occupied hours 500

400

300

200

100

0 24

28

32

36

40

44

48

Occupied hours: 8am â&#x20AC;&#x201C; midnight

52

56

60

64

68

72

76

80

84

88

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Wind Speed Statistics

600

100% 90%

523 499

80%

461 440

70%

Frequency [h]

400

381

366

60%

341

300

50%

286

40%

208

203

200

30%

157

20%

99

100

56

51 3

16

10%

36

27

20

7

20

18 0

0 1

2

3

Interval: 8h - 20 h X-Value Is Upper Limit

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Wind Speed [mph]

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

0%

Cumulative Frequency [%]

500

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Wind Speed, Direction and Frequency Statistics

>1.1 mph

0 338

1000 h

23

800 h 600 h

800 h

315

>21.3 mph

600 h 500 h

68

400 h

>28.0 mph

293

68

400 h

300 h

300 h

200 h

200 h

100 h

270

45

700 h

500 h

293

23

900 h

>14.5 mph

45

700 h

338

>7.8 mph

900 h

315

0 1000 h

100 h

90

0h

248

113

225

135 203

158 180

All 24 hours a day + Outside Air Temp < 77°F

270

90

0h

248

113

225

135 203

158 180

8am – 8pm + Outside Air Temp < 77°F

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Natural Ventilation Responses

Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through louvers

Prevailing wind South

Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through monitors

Natural ventilation with central mechanical exhaust

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Horizontal Radiation total 1629 kWh/m²/a

Insolation [kWh/m²]

200

Beam Radiation 913 kWh/m²/a

180

Diffuse Radiation 716 kWh/m²/a

160

Ground Reflection 0 kWh/m²/a

140 100

120

101

90 89

97 88

100 71

85

80 51

60

49

45

49

40

78 58

20

38

79

86

59

46

0 jan

81

66

feb

mar

apr

may

jun

jul

50

41

34

0

0

0

0

0

aug

sep

oct

nov

dec

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Radiation on Western Facade

total 900 kWh/m²/a

100

Beam Radiation 381 kWh/m²/a

90

Diffuse Radiation 356 kWh/m²/a

80

Ground Reflection 163 kWh/m²/a 38

Insolation [kWh/m²]

70 30

50

40

28

28

25 38

37

40

25

38

33

30 20

33 36

60

40

30 30

41

30

30

27

24

22

20

18

10 8

10

jan

feb

13

16

18

18

18

17

15

13

9

8

nov

dec

0 mar

apr

may

jun

jul

aug

sep

oct

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 6:45

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 7:30

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 8:15

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 9:00

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 9:45

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 10:30

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 11:15

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 12:00

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 12:45

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 13:30

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 14:15

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 15:00

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 15:45

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 16:30

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 17:15

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Responses

Exterior Shades

Buffer zone

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Responses

Storm window with exterior shades Existing window used as storm window Exterior shades New window with solar control coating

Bottom-up interior shade

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Response

With solar control coating

No solar control 4500

4500

4000

4000

3500

3500

3000

1839

3000

1796

1214 2500

1154 2500

843

2000

2000

521

1500 1000

793 485

1500 2140

2140

221 2037

1000

1690 1115

500 0 T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

2140

2029

99 680

T > 68

2140

T > 88

T > 92

1661 1080

500

21 294

189

0 32 T > 96

84 629

12 253

T > 88

T > 92

0 T > 68

T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

0 22 T > 96

Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Response

With interior shades

No solar control 4500

4500

4000

4000

3500

3500

3000

1839

3000

1214 2500

609 2000

521

1500 1000

964

2500

843

2000

1475

261

1500

2140

2140

221 2037

1000

1690 1115

500 0 T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

2135

1994 1560

99 680

T > 68

2140

T > 88

500

21 294 T > 92

0 32 T > 96

123 914

28 428

0 T > 68

T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

T > 88

0 86 T > 92

0 4 T > 96

Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Response

With exterior shades

No solar control 4500

4500

4000

4000

3500

3500

3000

1839

3000 1316

1214 2500 2000

474

2000

521

1500 1000

838

2500

843

189

1500 2140

2140

221 2037

1000

1690 1115

500 0 T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

2124

1974

99 680

T > 68

2140

T > 88

1459 500

21 294 T > 92

0 32 T > 96

81 749

12 274

0 T > 68

T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

T > 88

0 41 T > 92

0 2 T > 96

Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Solar Control Response

No solar control

With exterior shades and solar control coating

4500

4500

4000

4000

3500

3500

3000

1839

3000 1295

1214 2500 2000

455

2000

521

1500 1000

816

2500

843

180

1500 2140

2140

221 2037

1000

1690 1115

500 0 T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

2121

1967

99 680

T > 68

2140

T > 88

1439 500

21 294 T > 92

0 32 T > 96

76 725

12 262

0 T > 68

T > 72

T > 76

T > 80

T > 84

T > 88

0 33 T > 92

1 0 T > 96

Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Daylighting

Cross-section of window

Rule of Thumb Head of window 1

1 2.5

daylight control

2.5

solar and glare control

Cross-section of typical studio space Head of window 10’

10’ 16’

8’

16’

CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN

Controls and Automation Systems to be controlled Shading Windows Mechanical Lighting

Questions to ask Manual vs. automated Interdependency (‘lockout’) Ownership Whole-building vs. zoned

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades – Impetus • Relevant IEQ Survey Results • Majority of occupant workspaces are within 15 ft. of exterior walls or windows • Common complaints of poor temperature control • Too hot/humid/cold during warm weather • Too cold during cool weather • Majority of occupants dissatisfied with thermal comfort

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls • Insulation / vapor retarder benefits • Reduced energy use • Possible increase in occupant comfort • Potential improvement in air tightness • Potential drawbacks • Reduced wall temperatures during cold weather • Moisture accumulation • Condensation within walls • Wet masonry => Exterior staining RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

Insulation and vapor retarder

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

Moisture accumulation

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades – Windows • Concerns • Primary concern is contribution to building cooling loads • Secondary concern is occupant comfort • Tertiary concern is winter heating load • Restoration of wood frames and other components can address operability and water tightness but not thermal issues

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Building Enclosure

Building Enclosure Upgrades – Roof • Evaluation • Need for replacement is uncertain • Slate roofing is extremely durable and provides longevity when properly designed/constructed • Staining issues can likely be remedied and are aesthetic only • Presence or absence of insulation to be determined

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Acoustics

Acoustically Sensitive Programs classrooms library Sources of Noise shop mechanical rooms public gathering spaces studios (individual vs group work conflicts) street noise RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

exterior mechanical equipment

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Acoustics

E XT . S T AIR R 3002W W OME N

R 3001M ME N 306 OF F IC E

E LE V

E XT . S T AIR

308 OF F IC E

310 OF F IC E

3P S 2 LOB B Y

E XT . S T AIR

3S T W 4

3S T W 3

304 OF F IC E 304A S T OR AG E (316)

UP UP DN

301 C LAS S R OOM

3S T W 1

3S T W 2

DN

302 C LAS S R OOM

3P S 1 LOB B Y

303B OF F IC E

303 OF F IC E

305 C LAS S R OOM

303A OF F IC E

3

E XT . S T AIR

E XT . S T AIR

M2001 ME C H. S T AIR DN

S T AIR DN E LE V E XT . S T AIR

2P S 2 LOB B Y

C HAS E ?

502 DE S IG N LAB

503 DE S IG N LAB

201A C LOS E T

2C LS 1

201B K IT C HE N C HAS E ?

204 C LAS S R OOM

2C LS 2 C LOS E T

5P S 1 LOB B Y

5C R D1 C OR R IDOR

E LE V

206A S LIDE LIB R AR Y UP

S T AIR (open to floor below)

201 LE C T UR E

(open to floor below)

202 LIB R AR Y

201C C LOS E T

501 S T UDIO

UP

C HAS E ?

C HAS E ?

2P S 1 LOB B Y

V E S T IB ULE

5

DN

DN

2 DN

E XT . S T AIR

E XT . S T AIR

M4001 ME C H.

4E LE V 1 E LE V

E XT . S T AIR

4P S 1 LOB B Y

E XT . S T AIR

206 S LIDE LIB R AR Y

102 S T OR AG E

E LE V .

ME C H. DN

DN 404 C LAS S R OOM

E XT . S T AIR

E LE V .

E XT . S T AIR

1P S 2 E L. LOB B Y

R 1001W W OME N

104 DIG IT AL OUT P UT LAB

R 1002M ME N

M1003 ME C HANIC AL

E XT . S T AIR

M1001 ME C H.

110A OF F IC E 110 S HOP UP 4S T W 1 S T AIR

403 OF F IC E

4S T W 2 UP S T AIR 4C R D1 C OR R IDOR

405 C LAS S R OOM

407?

C LAS S R OOM?

P 1002 C HAS E

1C LS 2 1HW 1 HALL

J 1001 J ANIT OR

M1004 ME C H.

M1002 ME C H.

114A OF F IC E

116A OF F IC E

114B OF F IC E

116B OF F IC E

118 OF F IC E

120 OF F IC E

122 S T OR AG E

S T AIR 402 C LAS S R OOM

1C R D1 C OR R IDOR

121 OF F IC E

411 OF F IC E

119 OF F IC E

117 OF F IC E

115 OF F IC E

1P S 1 LOB B Y 113 OF F IC E

111 OF F IC E

109 OF F IC E

107 OF F IC E

105 OF F IC E

101 F AC ULT Y OP E R AT IONS

4

101A ME C H.

UP

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

1C R D2 C OR R IDOR UP

103 DR AWING B OAR D C AF E

J 1002

401 C LAS S R OOM

1C LS 1

E 1001 E LE C T .

123 OF F IC E

125 OF F IC E

127 OF F IC E

129 OF F IC E

131 C LAS S R OOM

131A P R INT S HOP

1

K IT C HE N

UP

F XFOWLE

Climate Analysis & Passive design

Acoustics: Interior Materials

glass/mineral fiber batt

mineral fiber ceiling tile

wood & fiberglass panels

acoustic plaster

carpet RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

fabric wrapped fiber board

wood fiber acoustic panels F XFOWLE

systems

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus  

 



  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

   

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

 

 

 

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Through Wall PTAC Ducted Central Station HVAC Unit Fan Coil Unit Heat and Exhaust Only Unconditioned (Heat Only) F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Energy Data & Peak Use at RMH 180

160

Electric Demand (kVA)

140

120

100

80

Richardson Memorial Electric Demand (kVA), 7/1/2004-7/1/2005 RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

7/1/2005

6/1/2005

5/1/2005

4/1/2005

3/1/2005

2/1/2005

1/1/2005

12/1/2004

11/1/2004

10/1/2004

9/1/2004

8/1/2004

7/1/2004

60

Systems

Thermal Complaints

Thermal Complaints

Asymmetric Thermal Radiation

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Existing & Projected Metering

Existing and Projected Metering

Service Electric Steam Chilled Water Domestic Water

Presently Metered?

Yes No No No

Proposed Metering?

Yes Yes Yes Yes

IBM Smart Building Program • Dashboard • Realtime energy analysis • Historical data Smart Building Program Implementation Energy Metering • By Source?

• By system?

• By zones?

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

``

F XFOWLE

Systems

Baseline Energy Model

Baseline Energy Model • Compare Baseline Energy Use to Proposed Energy Use • Baseline – ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Appendix G • Proposed – System types may incorporate heat recovery, displacement ventilation, natural ventilation, central systems, distributed systems, etc.

• Target Energy Reduction: – TU Target: 24% energy cost savings on major renovation projects – LEED Target: EAc1 - 9 points (24% savings) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Baseline Energy Model

Baseline Energy Model • Process: – Export Revit file (gbXML) to Autodesk Green Building Studio, then import into eQUEST. Run simulations in eQUEST. – Alternate: Build model directly in eQUEST. • Simulate Multiple Systems.

• Organize output to identify major areas of energy usage : – Dynamic: HVAC, Lighting, Plug Loads – Static: Chilled Water, Steam RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use

Actual Water Use Season

Total Consumption (Gallons) Actual

Potable (Gal.) Actual

Spring 402,488 34,013 Summer 38,183 3,938 Fall 358,620 30,180 Total 799,290 68,130 Based on 3.5 GPF for WC's and 1.5 GPF for Urinals

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Non-Potable (Gal.) Actual 368,475 34,245 328,440 731,160

F XFOWLE

Systems

Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use

Code Water Use Season

Total Consumption Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.) (Gallons) LA Plbg Code Table LA Plbg Code Table LA Plbg Code Table 406 406 406 Spring 216,083 34,013 182,070 Summer 20,894 3,938 16,956 Fall 192,468 30,180 162,288 Total 429,444 68,130 361,314 Based on 1.6 GPF for WC's and 1.0 GPF for Urinals

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use

LEED WE Water Use Season

Total Consumption Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.) (Gallons) LEED WE LEED WE LEED WE Reductions Reductions Reductions Spring 103,373 34,013 69,360 Summer 10,346 3,938 6,408 Fall 92,004 30,180 61,824 Total 205,722 68,130 137,592 Based on 0.8 GPF for WC's and 0.5 GPF for Urinals

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Water

Rainwater Harvest Potential - Grey Water Usage

800,000

Projected Annual Consumption (Gallons)

700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 -

Actual

LA Plbg Code Table 406

LEED WE Reductions

Actual

LA Plbg Code Table 406

LEED WE Reductions

Actual

LA Plbg Code Table 406

LEED WE Reductions

Spring

Total Consumption (Gallons) 402,488 216,083 103,373

34,013

Potable (Gal.) 34,013

34,013

368,475

Non-Potable (Gal.) 182,070

69,360

Summer

38,183

20,894

10,346

3,938

3,938

3,938

34,245

16,956

6,408

Fall

358,620

192,468

92,004

30,180

30,180

30,180

328,440

162,288

61,824

Total

799,290

429,444

205,722

68,130

68,130

68,130

731,160

361,314

137,592

Actual vs. Code vs. LEED Reductions RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Lighting

dimming/timeclock/scene controls

occupancy sensors

LED technology

daylighting

artificial lighting (general)

artificial lighting (task)

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

Systems

Information Technology

More:

personal computers power & data infrastructure locations & distribution

Technology:

Digital Media Digital Fabrication Wireless Connectivity

Energy: Increased Power Usage

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

operations & metrics

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

Waste Management

BIGGEST WASTE ISSUES Huge amount at end of semester, much is recyclable.

> 1 cu.yd/ student/ yr compacted

Dining area does not have ability to wash dishes

THUS, disposable dishes big component of waste

No composting - SUBSTANTIAL food waste.

Shop waste = approx. 1 large dumpster/yr (40. cu. yds)

RECYCLING AT RMH

No building recycling policies

Recycling containers for bottles, cans and paper

Bins located in studios, computer lab, offices

REMOVAL

Trash removed via passenger elevator - PROBLEM

Chute or freight elevator required

Facilities and Unico manage recycling

EQUIPMENT

Free pick up of electronic equipment bi-weekly

Electronics reused or donated to Baton-Rouge non-profit

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

Facilities Protocols

CONSUMABLES

RMH purchased consumables: Coffee and PAPER

Students purchase: chipboard, wood, sodas

No official “environmental policies” about purchasing

TSA meetings with decanted water and china/glassware

CLEANING/ PEST CONTROL

Facilities green cleaning policy per LEED EBOM

Pesticides sprayed outside each building monthly

Pesticides inside buildings done as last resort

Insecticide - Pyrethrums - natural product

Round-up is herbicide used - toxicity studies are debated

MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATIONS

Low VOC paint policy

Fluorescent light bulbs are green-tipped.

HEPA filters are replaced monthly SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT

Siemens building management systems

Facilities monitors systems / manages problems

Utilities Infrastructure manages RMH equipment

Equipment replaced with wear/ failure

Energy efficient equipment for replacements COMMISSIONING

Done on Dinwiddie, not Lavin-Bernick

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

Commissioning

What is Commissioning?

“a quality-oriented process for achieving, verifying, and documenting that the performance of facilities, systems, and assemblies meets defined objectives and criteria”

- ASHRAE

What are the benefits of commissioning?

• provides safe and healthful environments • optimizes energy use • reduces operating costs • ensures adequate O&M staff training • improves workplace performance due to higher quality environments

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovation

OPERATIONS & METRICS Project Checklist

LEED

TULANE UNIVERISTY RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - SUSTAINABILITY STUDY

15

3

7

Y

N

?

Sustainable Sites

Possible Points:

26

Y

Prereq 1

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

1

Credit 1

Site Selection

1

5

Credit 2

Development Density and Community Connectivity

5

Credit 3

Brownfield Redevelopment

1

6

Credit 4.1

Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access

6

1

Credit 4.2

Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms

1

Credit 4.3

Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles

3

Credit 4.4

Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity

2

1

Credit 5.1

Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat

1

1

Credit 5.2

Site Development—Maximize Open Space

1

1

Credit 6.1

Stormwater Design—Quantity Control

1

1

Credit 6.2

Stormwater Design—Quality Control

1

Credit 7.1

Heat Island Effect—Non-roof

1

1

Credit 7.2

Heat Island Effect—Roof

1

1

Credit 8

Light Pollution Reduction

1

1

3 1

1

5

0

5

Water Efficiency

Prereq 1 Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction Y RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

2

2

Credit 1

Water Efficient Landscaping

Possible Points:

10

F XFOWLE 2 to 4

1

Credit 6.2

Stormwater Design—Quality Control

1

Credit 7.1

Heat Island Effect—Non-roof

1

Credit 7.2

Heat Island Effect—Roof

1

Credit 8

Light Pollution Reduction

1

OPERATIONS & METRICS 1

LEED 1 1 5

0

5

Y 2

2

Water Efficiency Prereq 1

Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction

Credit 1

Water Efficient Landscaping

2

3

Possible Points:

10

2 to 4

Reduce by 50%

2

No Potable Water Use or Irrigation

4

2

Credit 2

Innovative Wastewater Technologies

2

1

Credit 3

Water Use Reduction

2 to 4

3

Reduce by 30%

2

Reduce by 35%

3

Reduce by 40%

4

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

LEED 15

6 14

6

Improve by 30% 16% for New Buildings or 26% 12% for Existing Building Renovations

10 3

Improve by 32% 18% for New Buildings or 28% 14% for Existing Building Renovations

11 4

Improve by 34% 20% for New Buildings or 30% 16% for Existing Building Renovations

12 5

Improve by 36% 22% for New Buildings or 32% 18% for Existing Building Renovations

13 6

Improve by 38% 24% for New Buildings or 34% 20% for Existing Building Renovations

14 7

by 40% Renovations Energy andImprove Atmosphere 26% for New Buildings or 36% 22% for Existing BuildingPossible Points:

15 835

Improve by 42% 28% for New Buildings or 38% 24% for Existing Building Renovations

16 9

Y

Prereq 1

Improve Commissioning by 44% Buildings 40% Existing Building Renovations Fundamental BuildingorEnergy Systems 30% for Newof 26% for

17 10

Y

Prereq 2

Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% Minimum Energy Performance 32% 28% for Existing Building Renovations

18 11

Y

Prereq 3

Improve Refrigerant by 48%+ forNew NewBuildings Buildingsoror30% 44%+ Existing Building Renovations Fundamental Management 34% for forfor Existing Building Renovations

19 12

Credit 2 1

On-Site Renewable Energy Optimize Energy Performance Improve by 36% for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations

13 1 to 7 19

6

7

6

6

1% Renewable Improve by 38% for New Buildings or 34% forExisting ExistingBuilding Building Renovations Renovations 12%Energy 8% for

14 1

3% Renewable Improve by 40% for New Buildings or 36% 14%Energy 10% for Existing Building Renovations

15 2

5% Renewable Improve by 42% for New Buildings or 38% 16%Energy 12% for Existing Building Renovations

16 3

7% Renewable Improve by 44% for New Buildings or 40% 18%Energy 14% for Existing Building Renovations

17 4

9% Renewable Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% 20%Energy 16% for Existing Building Renovations

18 5

11% Renewable by 48%+ forNew NewBuildings Buildingsoror18% 44%+ Existing Building Renovations Improve 22% Energy for forfor Existing Building Renovations

19 6

2

Credit 3

2

Credit 4

3

Credit 5

On-Site 13%Renewable Renewable Energy Improve by 24%Energy for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Enhanced Commissioning 1% Renewable Improve by 26%Energy for New Buildings or 22% for Existing Enhanced Refrigerant Management 3% Renewable Improve by 28%Energy for New Buildings or 24% for Existing Measurement and30% Verification 5% Renewable Energy Improve by for New Buildings or 26% for Existing

Building Renovations

3 10

2

Credit 6

GreenImprove 7%Power Renewable by 32%Energy for New Buildings or 28% for Existing Building Renovations

2 4 11

9% Renewable Improve by 34%Energy for New Buildings or 30% for Existing Building Renovations

5 12

11% Renewable Improve by 36% Energy for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations

6 13

13% Renewable Improve by 38% Energy for New Buildings or 34% for Existing Building Renovations

7 14

7

Credit 2

Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 2 Improve by 40% for New Buildings RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011 Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 2 Improve by 42% for New Buildings

Building Renovations

1 to 7 7

Building Renovations

2 1 8

Building Renovations

2 9

2 or 36% for Existing Building Renovations 15 F XFOWLE 2 or 38% for Existing Building Renovations 16

OPERATIONS & METRICS

LEED 9

3

2

Y 2

1

Materials and Resources Prereq 1

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Credit 1.1

Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof

2 1 2

2

1

Reuse 75%

2

Reuse 95%

3

Credit 2

Construction Waste Management

1 to 2

Credit 3

Credit 5

50% Recycled or Salvaged

1

75% Recycled or Salvaged

2

Materials Reuse

1 to 2

Reuse 5%

1

Reuse 10%

2

Recycled Content

1 to 2

10% of Content

1

20% of Content

2

Regional Materials

2 1

Reuse 55%

1

2

1

1 to 3

Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements

Credit 4

2

14

Credit 1.2

2 2

Possible Points:

1 to 2

10% of Materials

1

20% of Materials

2

Credit 6

Rapidly Renewable Materials

1

Credit 7

Certified Wood

1

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

LEED

1

1

11

0

4

2

10% of Materials

1

20% of Materials

2

Credit 6

Rapidly Renewable Materials

1

Credit 7

Certified Wood

1

Indoor Environmental Quality

Possible Points:

15

Y

Prereq 1

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Y

Prereq 2

Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control

1

Credit 1

Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring

1

1

Credit 2

Increased Ventilation

1

1

Credit 3.1

Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction

1

1

Credit 3.2

Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy

1

1

Credit 4.1

Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants

1

1

Credit 4.2

Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings

1

Credit 4.3

Low-Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems

1

1

Credit 4.4

Low-Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products

1

1

Credit 5

Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control

1

1

Credit 6.1

Controllability of Systems—Lighting

1

1

Credit 6.2

Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort

1

1

Credit 7.1

Thermal Comfort—Design

1

1

Credit 7.2

Thermal Comfort—Verification

1

Credit 8.1

Daylight and Views—Daylight

1

Credit 8.2

Daylight and Views—Views

1

1

1 1

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

LEED 6

0

0

Innovation and Design Process

Possible Points:

6

1

Credit 1.1

Sustainability Education Program

1

1

Credit 1.2

Green Housekeeping Program

1

1

Credit 1.3

Exemplary Performance in Construction Waste Management

1

1

Credit 1.4

Ergonomic Assesment and Furniture

1

1

Credit 1.5

Mold control/ prevention or Other

1

1

Credit 2

LEED Accredited Professional

1

1

1

2

MR Cr.2 - Construction Waste Management (75%)

1

1

Credit 1.2

SS Cr.6.1 - Stormwater Design Quantity Control

1

1

Credit 1.3

SS Cr.6.2 - Stormwater Design Quality Control

1

Credit 1.4

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

1 21

Possible Points: 4

Credit 1.1

1

62

Regional Priority Credits

26

Total Certified 40 to 49 points

Possible Points: 110 Silver 50 to 59 points

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Gold 60 to 79 points

Platinum 80 to 110

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

2030 CHALLENGE 60% GHG emissions reduction by 2010 - Avg EUI of 48.0 kBtu/sf/yr 70% GHG emissions reduction by 2015 - Avg EUI of 36.0 kBtu/sf/yr 80% GHG emissions reduction by 2020 - Avg EUI of 24.0 kBtu/sf/yr

2030 CHALLENGE Targets: U.S. National Averages U.S. Averages for Site Energy Use and 2030 Challenge Energy Reduction Targets by Space/Building Type1 From the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Use this chart to find the site fossil-fuel energy targets

2

Primary Space / Building Type

Available in Average Target Source EUI4 (kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr) Finder3

2030 Challenge Site EUI Targets (kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)

Average Percent Electric

(kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)

50% Target

60% Target

70% Target

80% Target

90% Target

170

63%

76

38.0

30.4

22.8

15.2

7.6

280

63%

120

60.0

48.0

36.0

24.0

12.0

681

86%

225

112.5

90.0

67.5

45.0

22.5

90%

241

120.5

96.4

72.3

48.2

24.1

Average Site EUI4

Administrative / Professional & Government Office Education College / University (campus-level) K-12 School Food Sales

Convenience Store 753 (with or withoutSTRATEGIES gas station) CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011 RMH SUSTAINABLE Grocery Store / Food Market

F XFOWLE

Buildings Energy Data Book: 3.9 Educational Facilitie OPERATIONS & METRICS Table A: 2030 Challenge Interim Code Equivalents

2030 CHALLENGE

CODE / STANDARD

3.9.1

2003 Delivered Energy End-Use Intensities and Cons

COMMERCIAL

EUI breakdown for Typical Educational Facility

(national avg. ASHRAE source: DOE90.1-2004 - Buildings Energy Data Book 2009)

ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 189 (in progress) IECC 2006 California Title 24 2005

Space Heating 30% below Cooling Ventilation Water Heating 25% below Lighting Cooking 0 Refrigeration Office Equipment 30% below Computers Other Total Note(s):

RESIDENTIAL (10^12 Btu) 389 47% 79 10% 83 10% 57 7% 113 14% 8 1% 16 2% 4 0% 30% below32 4% 39 5% 820 100% 13 15% - 20% below

(thousand Btu/S 39.4 8.0 8.4 5.8 11.5 0.8 1.6 0.4 4.0 3.4 83.1

1) Educational facilities include K-12 as well as higher educatio

14 A 50% GHG emissions reduction (pre-2010 goal) = 25% below ASHRAE 90.1-2007 10% below California Title 24 2008 Source(s): EIA, 2003 Commercial Building Energy Consumption and Expenditure

= 9 LEED 2009 EA Points

3.9.2 Code15Interim Code Equivalents 25% below Table A:Oregon 2030 Energy Challenge Washington Energy Code CODE / STANDARD RESNET Index ASHRAE HERS 90.1-2004 LEED NC 90.1-2007 2.2 / Homes ASHRAE

2003-2004 Number Public K-12 Schools in the Uni 30%of below

Number of Schools (2004-2005) 25% - 30% below16 25% below RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Regular (1) 86,487 Special 1,635 65 or less Vocational 326 30% below Alternative 4,847 New - EA Credit #1: 6 pts Total (2) 93,295 HERS Index: 65 25% below

Average N Elementar Middle High Other

Renovation - EA Credit #1: 8pts

Note(s): New - EA Credit #1: 7 1) ptsRegular schools are those responsible for providing free pub Data Renovation - EA Credit2)#1: 9ptsis based on total number of schools reporting current s 96,296. Special focuses primarily on special education with ma 17 30%school below focuses students. A vocational technical RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011below 30% F X Fon OW L E or career sk PATH A, 8.1.1.1: 150pts IECCStandard 2006 GBI (in progress) students that typically cannot be met in a traditional school sett

LEED 2009 (in(in progress) ASHRAE 189 progress)

0

OPERATIONS & METRICS

BENCHMARKING RMH, Tulane University

64

Dinwidde, Tulane University

52

All Bldgs Constructed 2000‐2003* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Floor space 25,000‐50,000* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Office* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Education* CBECS 2003

74 65 83 76

NREL Model Medium Office (Pre 1980) DOE Commercial Benchmarks NREL Model Medium Office (Post 1980) DOE Commercial Benchmarks NREL Model Medium Office (New) DOE Commercial Benchmarks

70 63 51

Mgmt Bldg at Georgia Tech** Aud, classrooms, offices, bookstore, retail The Balzer Theater at Herren's** Rehabilitated historic building with offices and restaurant Heifer International Headquarters** Commercial Office Rinker Hall (School of Construction) at the University of Florida…

59 59 34 30 0

10

20

30 40 50 Total Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/sf)

60

70

80

*CBECS data do not distinguish between dry and humid. New Orleans is considered to be Climate Zone 5, with CDD 2000 and HDD<4000. **These buildings are in climate zone 3A, classified by ASHRAE as warm and humid.

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

90

OPERATIONS & METRICS

BENCHMARKING

WARREN HALL - CORNELL UNIVERSITY SUSTAINABILITY GOALS

LEED Silver

OR: Energy 50% below ASHRAE 90.1 – 2007

Upgrade all systems (including adding A/C) with no net energy use increase

SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEVEMENTS

Anticipated LEED Gold at minimum, Platinum likely

Energy Usage Baseline: 95.9 kBtu/GSF/yr Anticipated Performance: 52.2 kBtu/GSF/yr (50.3% Energy Cost below baseline)

Anticipated 19 of 19 points in LEED EAcr1

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

OPERATIONS & METRICS

RMH Goals

GROWTH AND CHANGE OUT OF THE BOX

HOLISTIC

RESPONSIVE TO OCCUPANTS CONSIDER COST AND PHASING

FORWARD THINKING

DESIGN AS A TOOL FOR PEOPLE AND PLANET

SYNERGISTIC

REASONABLE AND UNREASONABLE AMBITIOUS

PEDAGOGICAL PRECEDENT SETTING FOR CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY INTEGRATES OPERATIONS

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE

CHARRETTE 12:20-12:35 12:20-12:35 CONCLUSION

12:35-12:50 12:35-12:50 12:50-1:05 12:50-1:05

What’s next?

1:05-1:30 1:05-1:30 Day 1: March 22nd, 2011

1 Team

1:30-1:50 1:30-1:50 Presentation 1:50-2:00 1:50-2:00

FXFOWLE // FXFOWLE el dorado dorado el el dorado/SGH el dorado/SGH

RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL Occupancy/Survey Occupancy/Survey March 22nd-23rd 2011 Architecture Architecture Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201

FXFOWLE/ FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Andropogon

Site and and Campus Campus Relationships Relationships Site

Transsolar/SGH Transsolar/SGH

Climate Analysis Analysis & & Passive Passive Design Design Climate

Altieri/FXFOWLE Altieri/FXFOWLE

Systems Systems

FXFOWLE/ 12:00-2:00 pm FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities Facilities Tulane Dean Schwartz/ 12:00-12:10 2:00-2:30 pm pm FXFOWLE 2:00-2:30

2 Q&A/Break Liz Davey/ 12:10-12:20 2:30-3:45 pm Collette Creppellpm 1 2:30-3:45 3 Breakout Groups Part

Operations and and Metrics Metrics Operations Introduction Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives

12:20-12:35

FXFOWLE / el dorado

Occupancy/Survey

12:35-12:50

el dorado/SGH

Architecture

Andropogon

Site and Campus Relationships

3:45-4:00 pm pm 4 Break 3:45-4:00

Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 4:00-5:15 pm pm 5 Breakout FXFOWLE/ 12:50-1:05 Day 1 5:15-6:00 5:15-6:00 pm pm 6 Final Report Transsolar/SGH 1:05-1:30 7:00-9:30 pm pm 7:00-9:30 7 Dinner1:30-1:50

1:50-2:00

Day 2: March 23rd, 2011 2 Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm

Climate Analysis & Passive Design

Altieri/FXFOWLE

Systems

FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities

Operations and Metrics

1 9:00-10:15 2:30-3:45 3 9:00-10:15pm am groups Part 3 am 8 Breakout Groups 4 3:45-4:00 pm 9 Break 10:15-10:30 am Break 10:15-10:30 am 4:00-5:15 pm 5 Breakout 10:30-11:45 am Breakout Groups Groups Part Part 2 4 10:30-11:45 am 10 6 11 7 12

Final ReportFinal Day 1Summary 5:15-6:00 pm 11:45am–12:00 pm pm Workgroup 11:45am–12:00 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 12:00-1:15 pm pm (Town (Town Hall) Hall)

2:30–5:00 pm pm Day 2: March Afternoon 23rd, 2011 Sessions 2:30–5:00 Optional

TGIW 5:00 pm pm 5:00 Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am 8 Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future”

Guy Geier, Geier, FXFOWLE FXFOWLE Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy

9 Break 10:15-10:30 am

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

10 Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am

F XFOWLE

CONCLUSION

Whatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s next?

group 1

group 2

group 3

group 4

group 5

Dan Maginn

Pete Pesce

Steve Salzer

Ilana Judah

TUES

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

TUES

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

WED

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

WED

Systems

Interior Organization and Function

Climate and Envelope

Site and Campus Relationships

Systems

2:30-3:45

4:00-5:15

9:00-10:15

10:30-11:45

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

Guy Geier

F XFOWLE

CONCLUSION

Q&A

Q&A

RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011

F XFOWLE