TULANE
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE 22-23 MARCH 2011
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
INTRODUCTION
A Vision for the Future of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
INTRODUCTION
CHARRETTE
TULANE UNIVERSITY RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL
Agenda: Day 1
March 22nd-23rd 2011 Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
1 Team Presentation 12:00-2:00 pm 12:00-12:10
Dean Schwartz/ FXFOWLE
Introduction
12:10-12:20
Liz Davey/ Collette Creppell
Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
12:20-12:35
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Occupancy/Survey
12:35-12:50 12:50-1:05
el dorado/SGH
Architecture
FXFOWLE/ Andropogon
Site and Campus Relationships
1:05-1:30 1:30-1:50
Transsolar/SGH
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Altieri/FXFOWLE
Systems
1:50-2:00
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Operations and Metrics
2 Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm 3 Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm 4 Break 3:45-4:00 pm 5 Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm 6 Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm 7 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Day 2: March 23rd, 2011 RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
INTRODUCTION
3 Breakout Groups Part 1 2:30-3:45 pm
Agenda: Day 2 4
Break 3:45-4:00 pm
5 Breakout Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 pm 6 Final Report Day 1 5:15-6:00 pm 7 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Day 2: March 23rd, 2011
8 Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am 9 Break 10:15-10:30 am 10 Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am 11 Workgroup Final Summary 11:45am–12:00 pm 12 Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 pm (Town Hall) Optional Afternoon Sessions 2:30–5:00 pm TGIW 5:00 pm Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy Geier, FXFOWLE
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
INTRODUCTION
Agenda: Workgroups & Topics
group 1
group 2
group 3
group 4
group 5
Dan Maginn
Pete Pesce
Steve Salzer
Ilana Judah
TUES
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
TUES
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
WED
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
WED
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
2:30-3:45
4:00-5:15
9:00-10:15
10:30-11:45
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Guy Geier
F XFOWLE
INTRODUCTION
Presenters TULANE
Kenneth Schwartz, Dean
Collette Creppell, University Architect Liz Davey, Office of Environmental Affairs
FXFOWLE Guy Geier, FAIA, FIIDA, LEED Peter Pesce, AIA Ilana Judah, Int’l Assoc. AIA, LEED
Dan Maginn, AIA Steve Salzer, AIA
AltieriSeborWieber LLC Philip C. Steiner, P.E.
TRANSSOLAR Erik Olsen, P.E.
Sean O’Brien, P.E., LEED AP Yaki Miodovnik, RLA, ASLA, CSLA RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
campus environmental initiatives
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
Analyzing Tulane’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Waste Commute 0.6% 7.4% Travel 25.5%
Study Abroad 1.3%
Fleet 0.9%
Buildings 64.3%
2009 Emissions by Sector RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
Tulane GHG Emissions (MTC02e) Emissions by Scope 160,000 140,000 120,000
52,796
59,510 59,951
62,579
100,000 Total Scope 3
80,000 60,000
Total Scope 2 77,620
68,568
63,765
64,232
21,082
20,243
17,537
2006
2007
2008
Total Scope 1
40,000 20,000 23,956
‐
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
2009
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
Emissions per student and sq. foot Normalized Emissions 2006
Full Time Enrollment (FTE) Per Capita Emissions (MTCO2e/FTE)
Total Building Area (sq. feet) Emissions Per 1000 sq. Feet (MTCO2e/1000 sq. Feet)
2007
2008
ACUPCC Average
2009
9,704
9,642
10,091
10,695
15.61
14.93
14.31
14.21
7.96
6,713,508 6,746,734 7,038,007 7,156,328 22.57
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
21.34
20.51
21.23
19.94
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Climate Action Plan & Campus Goals
Emission Reduction “Wedges” 160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000 External Actions Measures during 2015‐2020
80,000
Measures during 2010‐2015 Measures Underway
60,000
Total emissions
40,000
20,000
0 2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Recycling
A Recycling Snapshot: Uptown Campus RecycleMania Results • In February 2011. . . Garbage: 52‐57 tons/ week Recycling: 6‐10 tons/week Recycling Diversion Rate: 10‐18% • Tulanians can recycle all paper, cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminum & metal cans on the uptown campus. • Recycling services also provided for office electronics, laser and ink jet cartridges, and residence hall move‐out (clothes, household items, food, books, Mardi Gras beads). RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & Projects 1990’s
Early Initiatives
Timeline
Pre-Katrina
Post-Katrina
a
a
2011 -
C Current t IInitiatives iti ti
o Wall Residential College
Recycling Program
o Hertz Family Practice Facility
o Alcee Fortier
o Lavin Bernick Center for
o McAlister Place
o J. Bennett Johnson Labs
o Willow Residences
y Life University
LEED Standards
o Broad Street Health Clinic
o Israel Building
- Building Commissioning
o Richardson Memorial Sustainable Strategies
- Energy Modeling - Revit Energy gy Retrofits/ Conservation
o Dinwiddie Hall o Residential College II
* BLDG PHOTO 1
BLDG PHOTO 2
BLDG PHOTO 3
BLDG PHOTO 4
BLDG PHOTO 5
BLDG PHOTO 6
BLDG PHOTO 7
BLDG PHOTO 8
BLDG PHOTO 9
BLDG PHOTO 10
• Member of U.S. Green Building Council – since 2007 • Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) – since 2008 • American College & University President’s Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) – since 2008
* TSA Prototype House #4 – LEED Silver with two more houses completed or in progress RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
BLDG PHOTO 11
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & Projects
Dinwiddie Hall College II Features: o re-using existing building o recycling building materials o maximizing daylight and daylight harvesting o 76% solid waste recycled
Energy Usage:
Residential College II Features: o lighting and HVAC controls by motion sensor o maximized daylighting and
Hertz Family Practice Facility Features: o low flow showers and low flush plumbing fixtures o Solar ready
views i o louvered sun shades
Energy Usage:
Energy Usage:
o estimated to use 17.9% less
o energy usage of the
o energy usage in the design is
energy for 14.3% savings which
mechanical systems is
estimated to use 36% less
translates to $14,468/year
estimated to use 21% less
energy than baseline design
energy than baseline design Tracking LEED High Silver/Gold
T ki LEED Silver/Gold Tracking Sil /G ld
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
T ki LEED High Tracking Hi h Gold/Platinum G ld/Pl ti
F XFOWLE
Campus ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
Green Building Initiatives & Projects THE COST OF LEED
SUSTAINABILITY BENEFITS
SUSTAINABLE TULANE, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY
2% - 3% Silver/Gold 4% - 6% Platinum
SAVING MONEY (Financial)
FIRST COST VS. LIFECYCLE SAVINGS Cost Recovery Time: For university it might be 5 5-15 15 years For businesses it might be 3-5 years COMMISSIONING & ENERGY MODELING (most payback)
Cost Recovered by : Lower risk Higher energy efficiency Knowing the building and operations before it is opens
URBANbuild GREENbuild City Center Center for Public Service: Samuel Green edible school yard Green Light NOLA Priestly Charter School for Construction Center for Bio-Environmental Research Campus Sustainability Report Card A- (2010)
SAVING THE PLANET (Environmental) (E i t l)
Lower energy use Lower water use Less site disturbance
HEALTHY BUILDING/ HEALTHY PEOPLE
Improved health Higher productivity Reduced absenteeism Lower healthcare costs General wellbeing
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
occupancy & program
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
RESPONDENTS
135 28 4 =
faculty admin/ other distribution of years at RMH
SPACE USAGE
83% 45% 20%
students
16.5%
studio as primary work space classroom as secondary work space other secondary space (dorm, computer lab, etc) library as secondary work space
WEEKLY HOURS
52.5% 41% 60% 46% 63%
11-30 hours in primary work space > 30 hours in primary work space 10 hours or less in secondary space > 40 hours in RMH most time spent during day
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
GENERAL BUILDING / PRIMARY WORKSPACE SATISFACTION
41-42% 26% 32-33%
satisfied neutral dissatisfied
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
72%
conditions interfere with their work
BEST FEATURES
Daylight
ADEQUATE FEATURES
Acoustics Audio Visual
INADEQUATE FEATURES Information Technology Indoor Air Quality Artificial Lighting Information Technology Storage VERY INADEQUATE FEATURES
Thermal Comfort
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
BEST COMMON SPACES
Studios Library
ADEQUATE COMMON SPACES
Outdoor spaces Shop Digital output shop Classrooms
INADEQUATE COMMON SPACES
Computer Labs Pin up / Jury Drawing Board Cafe
TOP FAVORITE SPACES
Lobby Library Studios Entry porch/ outdoors
TOP LEAST FAVORITE SPACES
Computer Lab Offices/ Ground Floor Drawing Board Cafe Classrooms 204 & 404
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey STUDIOS - SPACE 68%
64% 73%
More space for group work More space for storage More comfortable furniture
STUDIOS - THERMAL COMFORT 66% Dissatisfied Comments- STUDIOS - LIGHT 78% 35% 62.5% Comments-
Too cold in cold weather Mixed issues in hot weather Problematic at all times of day Humidity problem in hot weather Need for personal control Many windows are not operable
Satisfied with natural light Dissatisfied with artificial light No task lights Need for lighting controls Blinds/ shades for glare Poor quality artificial light
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey STUDIOS - ACOUSTICS Mixed Satisfaction Comments-
Loud window AC units Hard reflective surfaces Loyola Physical plant noise Group / professor meetings Lack of separations Student culture
STUDIOS - USE 50% 45%
11-20 hours on weekdays outside class 11-20 hours on weekends outside class
Would use more if.... Improved thermal comfort More comfortable furniture Computers integrated in studios Lounge/ rest/ sleeping areas Food preparation/ kitchen space Acoustic control Proximity/ transportation to residence ALTERNATIVES TO STUDIO USE 35% Library 44% Computer lab RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey OFFICES - USE 80%
use as primary work space 11-30 hours
OFFICES - SATISFACTION 65% Satisfied with amount of daylight 60% Dissatisfied with amount of space 60% Dissatisfied with comfort of furniture 62% Dissatisfied with air quality 69-72% Dissatisfied with temperature Comments-
Humidity - problem for books Mold Variations in temperature Air infiltration through windows Lack of controls/ blinds No natural ventilation/ operable windows Shop needs to be acoustically insulated Noise from corridor due to air return Visual privacy from exterior
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
CLASSROOMS - FAVORITES
201, 202, 204 301, 305 405
CLASSROOMS - LEAST FAVORITE 201, 204 (temperature issues) 404, 405, 407/409 404 worst overall Furniture rated poorly in many rooms
Comments- Shades/ shutters insufficient for glare Furniture comfort/ lack writing space Poor Acoustics/ AV (internal/external) Poor thermal comfort/ controls Poor artificial lights/ controls Noise from Loyola Need business school style classrooms PIN-UP/ JURY SPACES 36-57%
Comments-
Dissatisfied with quality, quantity, visibility and access Poor lighting Too public/ lacks intimacy/ acoustic issues Need to incorporate use of technology
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
LIBRARY
66% 66-75%
use 1-5 hours per week temperature comfortable
Open longer/ at night More computers/ software/ outlets More up to date resources Better seating/ furniture
Would use more if.... COMPUTER LAB
Mixed
Importance
75% 68% 68% 50%
dissatisfied with air quality dissatisfied with space available dissatisfied with lack of daylight dissatisfied with number of computers
79% 51%
rate as useful use 1-2 per week
Issues of heat, odor, cleanliness More distribution throughout RMH DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB
Needs better management
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
SHOP
90%
use between once per month and never
Issues of lack of space and air quality Needs longer/ weekend hours Acoustic control to adjacent spaces DRAWING BOARD CAFE
44%
use 1-2 per week
Would use more if.... Open longer/ at night More ambiance/ daylight Better quality food Better air quality/ odors Access to exterior space OUTDOOR SPACES Mixed Importance Not enough opportunity to go outdoors Ideas...
Outdoor sheltered classroom Outdoor pinup/ sketching areas Covered space for full scale experiments Bike Lockers Tables & chairs to replace platforms
SECURITY
Most
Feel their person and property is secure
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Occupant IEQ and Program Survey
IMPORTANT ITEMS AND DREAMS FOR THE FUTURE... Better recycling!
Building as teaching tool
“Combining a high tech approach to environmental systems with enhancing the historic elements of the building structure.” Strong connection between inside and outside
High quality Computer Lab
“The building could be a place for the city. It can signify the new outlook of the city. A role model for the city. It can create interaction between the different studios.”
Outdoor Classrooms/ Seating Technologically advanced lighting and controls system
“Passive ventilation in the spring and fall. Zones for controlling a Living Building.”
Modern and innovative within Historic Facade
Lounge/ Nap Areas RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES STUDIOS
45%
IMPROVE STUDIO EXPERIENCE / STUDIO CULTURE CREATE RANGE OF PIN-UP SPACES, BOTH FLEXIBLE AND FIXED EXPLORE COMPUTER LABS WITHIN STUDIOS EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE FLOORS
CLASSROOMS
18%
ESTABLISH INTERMEDIATE-SIZED CLASSROOM(S)
OFFICES
15%
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
IMPROVE ADMIN OFFICE LAYOUT IMPROVE BUILDING RECEPTION SEQUENCE IMPROVE FACULTY OFFICING AREAS EXPAND / IMPROVE TRUDC / CITY CENTER / URBANBUILD OFFICES
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES RESEARCH / LIBRARY FUNCTIONS
10% SHOP
3%
PINUP
3%
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
EMBRACE CURRENT / PREDICTED TRENDS IN LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTS CONSIDER RELATIONSHIP TO CAFE ESTABLISH A CURATED ARCHITECTURE GALLERY EXTEND HOURS OF OPERATION EXPAND AND IMPROVE SHOP TO INCLUDE CAPABILITIES BEYOND WOOD
EXPLORE DEDICATED AREAS FOR SMALL / MEDIUM / LARGE CRITS
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Program
MAJOR PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES DRAWING BOARD CAFE
2%
IMPROVE CAFE EXPERIENCE EXPLORE POTENTIAL OF CAFE AS PART OF LEARNING COMMONS
COMPUTER LAB
2%
EXPLORE DE-CENTRALIZED COMPUTER LAB LOCATIONS
DIGITAL OUTPUT LAB
1%
EXPLORE SEPARATING DIGITAL IMAGING FROM 3D FAB EXPLORE DIGITAL IMAGING ON MULTIPLE LEVELS
RESTROOMS
1%
INCREASE NUMBER OF FIXTURES IN BUILDING PER CODE
EXTERIOR AREAS
EXPLORE SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE FEATURES IMPROVE EXTERIOR AMENITIES (SEATING, BIKE PARKING, ETC)
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN
R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE
310 OFFICE
3PS2 LOBBY
EXT. STAIR
3STW3
304 OFFICE 304A STORAGE (316) UP DN
301 CLASSROOM
3STW4
ELEV
EXT. STAIR
308 OFFICE
UP 3STW1
3STW2
DN
3PS1 LOBBY
303B OFFICE
303 OFFICE
303A OFFICE
302 CLASSROOM
305 CLASSROOM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 7 AM TO 1 PM
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN
R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE
310 OFFICE
3PS2 LOBBY
EXT. STAIR
3STW3
304 OFFICE
301 CLASSROOM
304A STORAGE (316) UP DN
3STW4
ELEV
EXT. STAIR
308 OFFICE
UP 3STW1
3STW2
DN
3PS1 LOBBY
303B OFFICE
303 OFFICE
303A OFFICE
302 CLASSROOM
305 CLASSROOM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 1 PM TO 7 PM
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN
R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE
310 OFFICE
3PS2 LOBBY
EXT. STAIR
3STW3
304 OFFICE
301 CLASSROOM
304A STORAGE (316) UP DN
3STW4
ELEV
EXT. STAIR
308 OFFICE
UP 3STW1
3STW2
DN
3PS1 LOBBY
303B OFFICE
303 OFFICE
303A OFFICE
302 CLASSROOM
305 CLASSROOM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 7 PM TO 1 AM
F XFOWLE
OCCUPANCY & PROGRAM
Building Schedule EXT. STAIR R3002W WOMEN
R3001M MEN 306 OFFICE
310 OFFICE
3PS2 LOBBY
EXT. STAIR
3STW3
304 OFFICE
301 CLASSROOM
304A STORAGE (316) UP DN
3STW4
ELEV
EXT. STAIR
308 OFFICE
UP 3STW1
3STW2
DN
3PS1 LOBBY
303B OFFICE
303 OFFICE
303A OFFICE
302 CLASSROOM
305 CLASSROOM
5 - 25 OCCUPANT HOURS 25 - 50 OCCUPANT HOURS 50 - 75 OCCUPANT HOURS 75 - 100 OCCUPANT HOURS 100 + OCCUPANT HOURS
LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
SPRING SEMESTER TYPICAL MONDAY 1 AM TO 7 AM
F XFOWLE
architecture
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
A History of Richardson Memorial Hall
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions • Solid masonry / load bearing walls • Single glazed / wood windows with minimal shading • Wood/steel framed roof; slate & terracotta
Construction style is more typical of northern climates than warm/humid locations with high solar gains
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Structure, Materials, and Building Re-Use
Existing Conditions Windows
• Some deterioration – restoration likely possible • Poor thermal performance • High solar heat gain
Walls
• Extremely durable construction • Poor thermal performance • Some exterior restoration needed
Roofs • Durable wearing materials
• Staining potential due to shading patterns • Localized repairs/restoration may be required RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Building Codes
PRELIMINARY CODE ANALYSIS CODE: IBC 2006 (2009 PENDING); NFPA 101 WILL APPLY (MORE STRINGENT) EGRESS: TWO MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIRED. EGRESS STAIRS TO BE ENCLOSED (OR CODE COMPLIANT EXTERIOR) ATRIUMS: ATRIUM SPACES LIMITED TO TWO CONNECTED STORIES, THEREFORE A FIRE BARRIER MUST BE ESTABLISHED AT THE THIRD LEVEL FLOOR AND AT THE FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR. EXISTING STAIRS: CAN REMAIN AS NON-REQUIRED "CONVENIENCE STAIRS" EXIT CORRIDORS: BECAUSE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED, THEY CAN BE NON RATED ADA: BUILDING MUST BE MADE FULLY COMPLIANT RESTROOMS: THERE WILL BE A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN TOILET FIXTURES, INCLUDING ADA.
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
E G R E SS ZO NE
E G R E SS ZO NE
E X T . S T A IR R 3002W W O ME N
R 3001M ME N 306 O F F IC E
E LE V
E X T . S T A IR
308 O F F IC E
310 O F F IC E
3P S 2 LO BBY
E X T . S T A IR
301 C LASSR O O M
X
M IN .
=X /3
3S T W 4
3S T W 3
304 O F F IC E 304A S TO R AG E ( 316 )
UP UP DN
3S T W 1
3S T W 2
DN
3P S 1 LO BBY
303B O F F IC E
303 O F F IC E
303A O F F IC E
3 =X / . N I M
X
302 C LASSR O O M
305 C LASSR O O M
O P E N A T R IU M IS S U E
LE V E L TH R E E F LO O R P LAN
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR T O 3
E L IM IN A T E S T A IR T O 5 E G R E SS ZO NE
E G R E SS ZO NE
E X T . S T A IR
M 4 001 ME C H . 4S T W 2 S T A IR 4E L E V 1 E LE V
E X T . S T A IR
401 C LASSR O O M
X
M IN .
4P S 1 LO BBY
DN
DN 404 C LASSR O O M
=X /3
E X T . S T A IR
3 =X / . N I M
UP 4C R D 1 C O R R ID O R
4S T W 1 S T A IR
403 O F F IC E
405 C LASSR O O M
407? C LASSR O O M?
X
402 C LASSR O O M
411 O F F IC E
E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 5
C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U N S E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R
LE V E L F O U R F LO O R P LAN
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
E N C L O S E D S T A IR T O 4
C O D E C O M P L IA N T R IS E /R U N S E P A R A T IO N F R O M E L E V A T O R
E G R E SS ZO NE B E L O W
E X T . S T A IR
TO E G R E S S BELOW
( o p e n to flo o r b e lo w)
5P S 1 LO BBY
DN 5C R D 1 C O R R ID O R
E LE V
C H ASE ?
C H ASE ?
502 D E S IG N L A B
503 D E S IG N L A B
( o p e n to flo o r b e lo w)
501 S T U D IO C H ASE ?
C H ASE ?
E L IM IN A T E S T A IR
L E V E L F IV E F L O O R P L A N
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
E G R E SS ZO NE
E G R E SS ZO NE
E X T . S T A IR
M 2 001 ME C H . 204 C LASSR O O M E X T . S T A IR
2P S 2 LO BBY
X 201 L E C TU R E
201A C LO SE T
M IN . = X / 3
2C L S 1
201B K IT C H E N
E X T . S T A IR
206 S L ID E L IB R A R Y
2C L S 2 C L O S E T
E LE V
206A S L ID E L IB R A R Y UP
S T A IR
DN
DN
M IN .= X / 3
X
202 L IB R A R Y
UP 2P S 1 LO BBY
V E S T IB U L E DN
DN
DN
N O N - C O M P L IA N T G U A R D R A IL IS S U E
LE V E L TW O F LO O R P LAN
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
ARCHITECTURE
Egress
N O N - R E Q U IR E D C O N V E N IE N C E S T A IR
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
E G R E SS ZO NE A B O V E
E G R E SS ZO NE A B O V E
E X T . S T A IR
102 S TO R AG E
E LE V. ME C H .
E LE V.
E XT. S T A IR
1P S 2 E L. LO BBY
R 1001W W O ME N R 1002M ME N
M 1 003 M E C H A N IC A L
104 D IG IT A L O U TP U T LAB
E XT. S T A IR
M 1 001 ME C H .
110A O F F IC E 110 SHOP
P 1002 C H ASE
1C L S 1
E 1001 E LE C T. 1C L S 2 1H W 1 H ALL
J1001 JA N IT O R
M 1 004 ME C H .
M 1 002 ME C H .
114A O F F IC E
116A O F F IC E
114B O F F IC E
116B O F F IC E
118 O F F IC E
120 O F F IC E
122 S TO R AG E
S T A IR 1C R D 1 C O R R ID O R
119 O F F IC E
117 O F F IC E
115 O F F IC E
113 O F F IC E
111 O F F IC E
109 O F F IC E
107 O F F IC E
105 O F F IC E
101 F A C U L T Y O P E R A T IO N S
101A ME C H .
UP
1C R D 2 C O R R ID O R UP
103 D R A W IN G B O A R D C A F E
J1002
121 O F F IC E
1P S 1 LO BBY
123 O F F IC E
125 O F F IC E
127 O F F IC E
129 O F F IC E
131 C LASSR O O M
131A P R IN T S H O P
K IT C H E N
UP
P O T E N T IA L E G R E S S L O C A T IO N
LE V E L O NE F LO O R P LAN
N
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
site & campus relationships
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
site & campus relationships
Access and Transportation
Streets
Streets
Shuttle Drop Off Location
Streetcar Stop
Shuttle Route
Bus Stop
Shuttle/ Streetcar 105 spaces
58 spaces
101 spaces Service Route
Parking RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Service F XFOWLE
site & campus relationships
Access and Transportation
Major Path
Bike Path
Minor path
Bike Path
Pedestrian Circulation 2010 Commuting Survey Uptown Results Students Personal Vehicle Carpool Streetcar Bus Walking and Biking Respondents
Faculty 34.10% 2.60% 0% 1.90% 61.50% 61
Staff 50.80% 4.80% 2.10% 0.50% 32.80% 39
74.80% 6% 1.10% 0.80% 13.70% 111
Campus Commuting RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
site & campus relationships
Site Plan
Stallings Hall
West Road Parking Garage
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING ROAD property line
Dinwiddie Hall
Richardson Memorial Hall
Richardson Building
Gibson Quad 30
0
15
30
60
Gibson Hall
120 ft.
n RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
site & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Exterior Opportunities
c
b
d
a e
f
n RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
site & CAMPUS RELATIONSHIPS
Storms and Climate Change FEMA Advisory Base Flood Elevation (2006) 3 feet above Highest Existing Adjacent Grade Existing ground floor is below HEAG+3’ Land sinking + sea level rise in Gulf of Mexico resulted in “relative sea-level rise” of three feet over past 100 years
POTENTIAL STRATEGIES Protection
Site grading Improved ventilation Dehumidification (high energy demand) Infrastructure improvements
Resistance
Mold resistant Materials Natural - Select woods, ceramic tile, porcelain, rubber Engineered - Fiberglass covered drywall, insulation, paints, coatings
Passive collection/ containment
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
ABFE 3 ft above HEAG
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Natural Systems: Eco-Region
Southern Holocene Meander Belts • • •
•
Drains all or parts of 31 States, 2 Canadian Provences (over 1,000,000 square miles) into the Gulf of Mexico. Critical wildlife habitat includies the largest continuous system of wetlands in North America. Levees have separated much of the Mississippi from its natural hydrologic system contributing to a decrease of sediment mobilization and altering the natural delta formation leading to habitat loss. Point bars, depositional features along the inside of stream beds, were originally occupied by diverse forests of cottonwood, sugarberry, sycamore, green ash, and pecan. Drier sides of the flood plain are marked by willow oak, water oak, swamp chestnut oak, and cherrybark oak. Also common in the southern region are live oak, Spanish moss, and laurel oak.
Bottomland Deciduous Forest Vegetation
Eco-Region Map
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Natural Sytems: Geology and Physiography Holocene Geology and Physiography of New Orleans idge
•
ly R entil G e i r i Meta
•
Levee Flank Depression
•
Mississippi River levees form the high ground derived from alluvial deposits underlain by sands. Typically gray and brown silts, silty clay, and some very fine sands. The Mid-town area between the Mississippi and Metairie Ridge was an enclosed depression known as a “levee flank depression” The campus is situated on the border between the alluvial deposits and the depression. The site is underlain by the Pleistocene age Prairie formation. This unit dips down beneath the city and is generally encountered at depths greater than 40 feet.
Richardson Hall
Tulane University
Point Bar Alluvial Deposits elevation 40 - 45 35 - 40 30 - 35 25 - 30 20 - 25 15 - 20
Mississippi River
10 - 15 5 - 10 0-5 -4 - 0 -9 - -5 -14 - -10 -19 - -15 -24 - -20 -28 - -25
0
Feet 2,000
Physiography Map
Geology Sections
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Natural Systems: Hydrology 17th Street Ca
nal
To Lake Pontchartrain
Hydrology •
•
•
Campus drains away from the Mississippi River, eventually towards the 17th Canal and into Lake Ponchartrain Combined Sewer System modifies the natural hydrologic pattern, draining eastward towards Mississippi River Gulf Outlet Tulane University was on the border of the Katrina flood extents due to its elevated location on the natural levee. Flooding was minimal north of Freret Street including the historic quad.
500-year flood zone
100-year flood zone
flood zone 100-year 500-year
0
Feet 2,800
Flood Zone Map
Mississippi River Gulf Outlet
elevation (msl) -28 - -20 -19 - -10 -9 - 0 0 - 10
The Sewage Collection System
10 - 20 20 - 30 30 - 40 40 - 50
0
Feet 2,500
Natural Hydrology Pattern
Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Modified Hydrologic Pattern- Wastewater
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
http://swbnola.org
Katrina Flood Map
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Average Monthly Precipitation (in) Natural Systems: Water Resource
Water Reuse •
8 6
•
4
•
2 0 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
•
Dec
Richardson Hall could collect an average of 4000-6000 cu. ft. of rainwater per month. Irrigates approximately 0.5 acres, assuming 1” per week. Would require a theoretical cistern 14’ diamter and 40’ tall. for storage. (7000 cu. ft) Irrigation for the entire Quad would require 10x this amount
Rainfall Pattern (average inches per month)
Roof Collection
Roof Garden
Storage Cisterns
Roof Garden
11,600 sq. ft.
Quad Area for Irrigation
Roof Garden
Roof Garden
Rooftop Collection (cu. ft.) RooftopPotential Collection withRainwater surrounding RoofVolume Gardens
0
50’
7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Rooftop Collection Volume (average cu. ft. per month) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Natural Systems: Soils
Sk
Cm, Cancienne silt loam (south campus) and,
NRCS Soil Types CS, Cancienne and Schriever soils, frequently flooded Cm, Cancienne silt loam
Ha
Co, Cancienne silty clay loam Ha, Harahan clay LV, Levees-Borrow pits complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes
CS
Sk, Schriever clay
Soil Conditions •
Co
• LV
Ub, Urban land W, Water
0
Feet 2,000
• Cm
Sk
•
Highly productive, found on natural levees. Consists of silty alluvium, depth to root restrictive layer > 60 in. Somewhat poorly drained, moderately high movement in restrictive layer. Low shrink-swell potential. (subsidence) High water table at 1.4 to 4 feet below the surface. Construction limitations are moderate Southern hardwoods such as green ash, cottonwood, oaks, and sweetgum.
Sk, Schriever clay (north campus) • CS
Cm
•
Ub
•
Soils Map •
Subsidence Map
Found in backswamps. Consists of clayey alluvium, depth to root restrictive layer > 60 in. Poorly drained hydric soil. Low water movement in the most restrictive layer. Very high shrink-swell potential. Severe construction limitations. (subsidence) High water table at 12 inches. Surface layer is very dark gray clay to 10 inches. Subsoils are dark gray clay. Fairly productive soil suitable for bermudagrass, dallisgrass, tall fescue and white clover. Good for tree species adapted to wet clay soils.
Compaction
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Existing
n
w
s e
Key Plan
Richardson Memorial Building
View West (w) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
View South (s)
View North (n)
View East (e)
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Spatial Quality and Characteristics Goals • • • • • •
Pedestrian Connection
Building Entrances/ Forecourt
University Boundary
Quad/ Green
Organization/ Hierarchy of Spaces Organization/ Hierarchy of path systems Gateways for Wayfinding Forecourts to celebrate entrances Outdoor gathering spaces Identify property and preserve campus identity
Social Gathering Spaces
Gathering Spaces
Material Use
Gateway
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Active Open Space
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Tree Cover Cypress
Live oak
Magnolia
Cherry
Cypress Shade Tree Understory Tree Gibson Quad Tree Cover Plan
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Bamboo
Richardson Building Tree Cover
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Hardscape Materials
Limestone Concrete Stepping Stones Concrete Walk
Richardson Building Hardscape
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Material Recycle
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Infrastructure
Water Sewer Telecommunications Down Spout Sump Pump
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
SITE & campus relationships
Site Conditions: Site Furnishings
Light Fixture
Bike Racks
Benches
Bike Rack/ Tables RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Table/ Trash Receptacle
F XFOWLE
climate analysis & passive design
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Thermal Comfort Factors
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Thermal Comfort: Indoor Operative and Outdoor Air Temperatures
Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature 째C
Comfort: Naturally ventilated spaces
Indoor Operative Temperature 째F
N e w O rle a n s
Indoor Operative Temperature 째C
Mean Monthly Outdoor Air Temperature 째F
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity
Outside Air Temperature [째F]
Outside Air Temperature [째F]
100
Absolute Humidity [g/kg]
80
60
50
40
Natural Ventilation 60
30
40
20
20
0
Natural Ventilation
10
0
01 Jan 0:00 31 Jan 10:00 02 Mar 20:00 02 Apr 6:00 02 May 16:00 02 Jun 2:00 02 Jul 12:00 01 Aug 22:00 01 Sep 8:00 01 Oct 18:00 01 Nov 4:00 01 Dec 14:00 01 Jan 0:00
Ambsolute Humidity [g/kg]
120
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Winter Week Outside Air Temperature [°F] Absolute Humidity [‰]
80 70
50 40 30 20
Cold day
Mild day
23 Dec 0:00
22 Dec 12:00
22 Dec 0:00
21 Dec 12:00
21 Dec 0:00
20 Dec 12:00
20 Dec 0:00
19 Dec 12:00
19 Dec 0:00
18 Dec 12:00
18 Dec 0:00
0
17 Dec 12:00
10
17 Dec 0:00
Outside Air Temperature [°F]
60
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Outside Air Temperature and Absolute Humidity: Typical Autumn Week Outside Air Temperature [°F] Absolute Humidity [‰]
90 80
60 50 40 30 20
Mild day
Mild day
20 Oct 0:00
19 Oct 12:00
19 Oct 0:00
18 Oct 12:00
18 Oct 0:00
17 Oct 12:00
17 Oct 0:00
16 Oct 12:00
16 Oct 0:00
15 Oct 12:00
15 Oct 0:00
0
14 Oct 12:00
10
14 Oct 0:00
Outside Air Temperature [°F]
70
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Thermal Comfort Ranges 25 100 %
24H/D
80%
60%
Operation Time 8h - 20h
Humidity Ratio [‰]
20
40%
15
10 20%
Extended indoor comfort range
5
ASHRAE winter indoor comfort range
ASHRAE summer indoor comfort range
0 25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Outdoor Air Temperature [°F]
Comfort: Mechanically ventilated spaces
75
80
85
90
95
100
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Outside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <10 g/kg Natural Ventilation: 44% of occupied hours 500
400
300
200
100
0 24
28
32
36
40
44
48
Occupied hours: 8am â&#x20AC;&#x201C; midnight
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Outside Air Temperature Statistics for Humidity Ratios <14 g/kg Natural Ventilation: 63% of occupied hours 500
400
300
200
100
0 24
28
32
36
40
44
48
Occupied hours: 8am â&#x20AC;&#x201C; midnight
52
56
60
64
68
72
76
80
84
88
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Wind Speed Statistics
600
100% 90%
523 499
80%
461 440
70%
Frequency [h]
400
381
366
60%
341
300
50%
286
40%
208
203
200
30%
157
20%
99
100
56
51 3
16
10%
36
27
20
7
20
18 0
0 1
2
3
Interval: 8h - 20 h X-Value Is Upper Limit
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Wind Speed [mph]
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
0%
Cumulative Frequency [%]
500
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Wind Speed, Direction and Frequency Statistics
>1.1 mph
0 338
1000 h
23
800 h 600 h
800 h
315
>21.3 mph
600 h 500 h
68
400 h
>28.0 mph
293
68
400 h
300 h
300 h
200 h
200 h
100 h
270
45
700 h
500 h
293
23
900 h
>14.5 mph
45
700 h
338
>7.8 mph
900 h
315
0 1000 h
100 h
90
0h
248
113
225
135 203
158 180
All 24 hours a day + Outside Air Temp < 77°F
270
90
0h
248
113
225
135 203
158 180
8am – 8pm + Outside Air Temp < 77°F
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Natural Ventilation Responses
Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through louvers
Prevailing wind South
Natural ventilation with stack-driven exhaust through monitors
Natural ventilation with central mechanical exhaust
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Horizontal Radiation total 1629 kWh/m²/a
Insolation [kWh/m²]
200
Beam Radiation 913 kWh/m²/a
180
Diffuse Radiation 716 kWh/m²/a
160
Ground Reflection 0 kWh/m²/a
140 100
120
101
90 89
97 88
100 71
85
80 51
60
49
45
49
40
78 58
20
38
79
86
59
46
0 jan
81
66
feb
mar
apr
may
jun
jul
50
41
34
0
0
0
0
0
aug
sep
oct
nov
dec
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Radiation on Western Facade
total 900 kWh/m²/a
100
Beam Radiation 381 kWh/m²/a
90
Diffuse Radiation 356 kWh/m²/a
80
Ground Reflection 163 kWh/m²/a 38
Insolation [kWh/m²]
70 30
50
40
28
28
25 38
37
40
25
38
33
30 20
33 36
60
40
30 30
41
30
30
27
24
22
20
18
10 8
10
jan
feb
13
16
18
18
18
17
15
13
9
8
nov
dec
0 mar
apr
may
jun
jul
aug
sep
oct
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 6:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 7:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 8:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 9:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 9:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 10:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 11:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 12:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 12:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 13:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 14:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 15:00
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 15:45
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 16:30
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control: View from the Sun (Mar 21) 17:15
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Responses
Exterior Shades
Buffer zone
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Responses
Storm window with exterior shades Existing window used as storm window Exterior shades New window with solar control coating
Bottom-up interior shade
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Response
With solar control coating
No solar control 4500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3500
3000
1839
3000
1796
1214 2500
1154 2500
843
2000
2000
521
1500 1000
793 485
1500 2140
2140
221 2037
1000
1690 1115
500 0 T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
2140
2029
99 680
T > 68
2140
T > 88
T > 92
1661 1080
500
21 294
189
0 32 T > 96
84 629
12 253
T > 88
T > 92
0 T > 68
T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
0 22 T > 96
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Response
With interior shades
No solar control 4500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3500
3000
1839
3000
1214 2500
609 2000
521
1500 1000
964
2500
843
2000
1475
261
1500
2140
2140
221 2037
1000
1690 1115
500 0 T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
2135
1994 1560
99 680
T > 68
2140
T > 88
500
21 294 T > 92
0 32 T > 96
123 914
28 428
0 T > 68
T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
T > 88
0 86 T > 92
0 4 T > 96
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Response
With exterior shades
No solar control 4500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3500
3000
1839
3000 1316
1214 2500 2000
474
2000
521
1500 1000
838
2500
843
189
1500 2140
2140
221 2037
1000
1690 1115
500 0 T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
2124
1974
99 680
T > 68
2140
T > 88
1459 500
21 294 T > 92
0 32 T > 96
81 749
12 274
0 T > 68
T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
T > 88
0 41 T > 92
0 2 T > 96
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Solar Control Response
No solar control
With exterior shades and solar control coating
4500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3500
3000
1839
3000 1295
1214 2500 2000
455
2000
521
1500 1000
816
2500
843
180
1500 2140
2140
221 2037
1000
1690 1115
500 0 T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
2121
1967
99 680
T > 68
2140
T > 88
1439 500
21 294 T > 92
0 32 T > 96
76 725
12 262
0 T > 68
T > 72
T > 76
T > 80
T > 84
T > 88
0 33 T > 92
1 0 T > 96
Humidity Ratio <15 g/kg Humidity Ratio ≥15 g/kg
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Daylighting
Cross-section of window
Rule of Thumb Head of window 1
1 2.5
daylight control
2.5
solar and glare control
Cross-section of typical studio space Head of window 10’
10’ 16’
8’
16’
CLIMATE ANALYSIS & PASSIVE DESIGN
Controls and Automation Systems to be controlled Shading Windows Mechanical Lighting
Questions to ask Manual vs. automated Interdependency (‘lockout’) Ownership Whole-building vs. zoned
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Impetus • Relevant IEQ Survey Results • Majority of occupant workspaces are within 15 ft. of exterior walls or windows • Common complaints of poor temperature control • Too hot/humid/cold during warm weather • Too cold during cool weather • Majority of occupants dissatisfied with thermal comfort
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Exterior Walls • Insulation / vapor retarder benefits • Reduced energy use • Possible increase in occupant comfort • Potential improvement in air tightness • Potential drawbacks • Reduced wall temperatures during cold weather • Moisture accumulation • Condensation within walls • Wet masonry => Exterior staining RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
Insulation and vapor retarder
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
Moisture accumulation
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Exterior Walls
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Windows • Concerns • Primary concern is contribution to building cooling loads • Secondary concern is occupant comfort • Tertiary concern is winter heating load • Restoration of wood frames and other components can address operability and water tightness but not thermal issues
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Building Enclosure
Building Enclosure Upgrades – Roof • Evaluation • Need for replacement is uncertain • Slate roofing is extremely durable and provides longevity when properly designed/constructed • Staining issues can likely be remedied and are aesthetic only • Presence or absence of insulation to be determined
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Acoustics
Acoustically Sensitive Programs classrooms library Sources of Noise shop mechanical rooms public gathering spaces studios (individual vs group work conflicts) street noise RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
exterior mechanical equipment
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Acoustics
E XT . S T AIR R 3002W W OME N
R 3001M ME N 306 OF F IC E
E LE V
E XT . S T AIR
308 OF F IC E
310 OF F IC E
3P S 2 LOB B Y
E XT . S T AIR
3S T W 4
3S T W 3
304 OF F IC E 304A S T OR AG E (316)
UP UP DN
301 C LAS S R OOM
3S T W 1
3S T W 2
DN
302 C LAS S R OOM
3P S 1 LOB B Y
303B OF F IC E
303 OF F IC E
305 C LAS S R OOM
303A OF F IC E
3
E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S T AIR
M2001 ME C H. S T AIR DN
S T AIR DN E LE V E XT . S T AIR
2P S 2 LOB B Y
C HAS E ?
502 DE S IG N LAB
503 DE S IG N LAB
201A C LOS E T
2C LS 1
201B K IT C HE N C HAS E ?
204 C LAS S R OOM
2C LS 2 C LOS E T
5P S 1 LOB B Y
5C R D1 C OR R IDOR
E LE V
206A S LIDE LIB R AR Y UP
S T AIR (open to floor below)
201 LE C T UR E
(open to floor below)
202 LIB R AR Y
201C C LOS E T
501 S T UDIO
UP
C HAS E ?
C HAS E ?
2P S 1 LOB B Y
V E S T IB ULE
5
DN
DN
2 DN
E XT . S T AIR
E XT . S T AIR
M4001 ME C H.
4E LE V 1 E LE V
E XT . S T AIR
4P S 1 LOB B Y
E XT . S T AIR
206 S LIDE LIB R AR Y
102 S T OR AG E
E LE V . ME C H. DN
DN 404 C LAS S R OOM
E XT . S T AIR
E LE V .
E XT . S T AIR
1P S 2 E L. LOB B Y
R 1001W W OME N
104 DIG IT AL OUT P UT LAB
R 1002M ME N
M1003 ME C HANIC AL
E XT . S T AIR
M1001 ME C H.
110A OF F IC E 110 S HOP UP 4S T W 1 S T AIR
403 OF F IC E
4S T W 2 UP S T AIR 4C R D1 C OR R IDOR
405 C LAS S R OOM
407? C LAS S R OOM?
P 1002 C HAS E
1C LS 2 1HW 1 HALL
J 1001 J ANIT OR
M1004 ME C H.
M1002 ME C H.
114A OF F IC E
116A OF F IC E
114B OF F IC E
116B OF F IC E
118 OF F IC E
120 OF F IC E
122 S T OR AG E
S T AIR 402 C LAS S R OOM
1C R D1 C OR R IDOR
121 OF F IC E
411 OF F IC E
119 OF F IC E
117 OF F IC E
115 OF F IC E
1P S 1 LOB B Y 113 OF F IC E
111 OF F IC E
109 OF F IC E
107 OF F IC E
105 OF F IC E
101 F AC ULT Y OP E R AT IONS
4
101A ME C H.
UP
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
1C R D2 C OR R IDOR UP
103 DR AWING B OAR D C AF E
J 1002
401 C LAS S R OOM
1C LS 1
E 1001 E LE C T .
123 OF F IC E
125 OF F IC E
127 OF F IC E
129 OF F IC E
131 C LAS S R OOM
131A P R INT S HOP
1
K IT C HE N
UP
F XFOWLE
Climate Analysis & Passive design
Acoustics: Interior Materials
glass/mineral fiber batt
mineral fiber ceiling tile
wood & fiberglass panels
acoustic plaster
carpet RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
fabric wrapped fiber board
wood fiber acoustic panels F XFOWLE
systems
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Through Wall PTAC Ducted Central Station HVAC Unit Fan Coil Unit Heat and Exhaust Only Unconditioned (Heat Only) F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
MEP Sytems at RMH and on Campus
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Energy Data & Peak Use at RMH 180
160
Electric Demand (kVA)
140
120
100
80
Richardson Memorial Electric Demand (kVA), 7/1/2004-7/1/2005 RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
7/1/2005
6/1/2005
5/1/2005
4/1/2005
3/1/2005
2/1/2005
1/1/2005
12/1/2004
11/1/2004
10/1/2004
9/1/2004
8/1/2004
7/1/2004
60
Systems
Thermal Complaints
Thermal Complaints
Asymmetric Thermal Radiation
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Existing & Projected Metering
Existing and Projected Metering
Service Electric Steam Chilled Water Domestic Water
Presently Metered? Yes No No No
Proposed Metering? Yes Yes Yes Yes
IBM Smart Building Program • Dashboard • Realtime energy analysis • Historical data Smart Building Program Implementation Energy Metering • By Source? • By system? • By zones?
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
``
F XFOWLE
Systems
Baseline Energy Model
Baseline Energy Model • Compare Baseline Energy Use to Proposed Energy Use • Baseline – ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Appendix G • Proposed – System types may incorporate heat recovery, displacement ventilation, natural ventilation, central systems, distributed systems, etc. • Target Energy Reduction: – TU Target: 24% energy cost savings on major renovation projects – LEED Target: EAc1 - 9 points (24% savings) RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Baseline Energy Model
Baseline Energy Model • Process: – Export Revit file (gbXML) to Autodesk Green Building Studio, then import into eQUEST. Run simulations in eQUEST. – Alternate: Build model directly in eQUEST. • Simulate Multiple Systems. • Organize output to identify major areas of energy usage : – Dynamic: HVAC, Lighting, Plug Loads – Static: Chilled Water, Steam RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
Actual Water Use Season
Total Consumption (Gallons) Actual
Potable (Gal.) Actual
Spring 402,488 34,013 Summer 38,183 3,938 Fall 358,620 30,180 Total 799,290 68,130 Based on 3.5 GPF for WC's and 1.5 GPF for Urinals
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Non-Potable (Gal.) Actual 368,475 34,245 328,440 731,160
F XFOWLE
Systems
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
Code Water Use Season
Total Consumption Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.) (Gallons) LA Plbg Code Table LA Plbg Code Table LA Plbg Code Table 406 406 406 Spring 216,083 34,013 182,070 Summer 20,894 3,938 16,956 Fall 192,468 30,180 162,288 Total 429,444 68,130 361,314 Based on 1.6 GPF for WC's and 1.0 GPF for Urinals
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Water: Seasonal potable and Non-Potable Water Use
LEED WE Water Use Season
Total Consumption Potable (Gal.) Non-Potable (Gal.) (Gallons) LEED WE LEED WE LEED WE Reductions Reductions Reductions Spring 103,373 34,013 69,360 Summer 10,346 3,938 6,408 Fall 92,004 30,180 61,824 Total 205,722 68,130 137,592 Based on 0.8 GPF for WC's and 0.5 GPF for Urinals
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Water
Rainwater Harvest Potential - Grey Water Usage
800,000
Projected Annual Consumption (Gallons)
700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 -
Actual
LA Plbg Code Table 406
LEED WE Reductions
Actual
LA Plbg Code Table 406
LEED WE Reductions
Actual
LA Plbg Code Table 406
LEED WE Reductions
Spring
Total Consumption (Gallons) 402,488 216,083 103,373
34,013
Potable (Gal.) 34,013
34,013
368,475
Non-Potable (Gal.) 182,070
69,360
Summer
38,183
20,894
10,346
3,938
3,938
3,938
34,245
16,956
6,408
Fall
358,620
192,468
92,004
30,180
30,180
30,180
328,440
162,288
61,824
Total
799,290
429,444
205,722
68,130
68,130
68,130
731,160
361,314
137,592
Actual vs. Code vs. LEED Reductions RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Lighting
dimming/timeclock/scene controls
occupancy sensors
LED technology
daylighting
artificial lighting (general)
artificial lighting (task)
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
Systems
Information Technology
More:
personal computers power & data infrastructure locations & distribution
Technology:
Digital Media Digital Fabrication Wireless Connectivity
Energy: Increased Power Usage
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
operations & metrics
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Waste Management
BIGGEST WASTE ISSUES Huge amount at end of semester, much is recyclable. > 1 cu.yd/ student/ yr compacted Dining area does not have ability to wash dishes THUS, disposable dishes big component of waste No composting - SUBSTANTIAL food waste. Shop waste = approx. 1 large dumpster/yr (40. cu. yds)
RECYCLING AT RMH No building recycling policies Recycling containers for bottles, cans and paper Bins located in studios, computer lab, offices
REMOVAL Trash removed via passenger elevator - PROBLEM Chute or freight elevator required Facilities and Unico manage recycling EQUIPMENT Free pick up of electronic equipment bi-weekly Electronics reused or donated to Baton-Rouge non-profit
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Facilities Protocols
CONSUMABLES RMH purchased consumables: Coffee and PAPER Students purchase: chipboard, wood, sodas No official “environmental policies” about purchasing TSA meetings with decanted water and china/glassware
CLEANING/ PEST CONTROL Facilities green cleaning policy per LEED EBOM Pesticides sprayed outside each building monthly Pesticides inside buildings done as last resort Insecticide - Pyrethrums - natural product Round-up is herbicide used - toxicity studies are debated MAINTENANCE AND ALTERATIONS Low VOC paint policy Fluorescent light bulbs are green-tipped. HEPA filters are replaced monthly SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT Siemens building management systems Facilities monitors systems / manages problems Utilities Infrastructure manages RMH equipment Equipment replaced with wear/ failure Energy efficient equipment for replacements COMMISSIONING Done on Dinwiddie, not Lavin-Bernick
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
Commissioning
What is Commissioning?
“a quality-oriented process for achieving, verifying, and documenting that the performance of facilities, systems, and assemblies meets defined objectives and criteria” - ASHRAE
What are the benefits of commissioning?
• provides safe and healthful environments • optimizes energy use • reduces operating costs • ensures adequate O&M staff training • improves workplace performance due to higher quality environments
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovation
OPERATIONS & METRICS Project Checklist
LEED
TULANE UNIVERISTY RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE - SUSTAINABILITY STUDY
15
3
7
Y
N
?
Sustainable Sites
Possible Points:
26
Y
Prereq 1
Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
1
Credit 1
Site Selection
1
5
Credit 2
Development Density and Community Connectivity
5
Credit 3
Brownfield Redevelopment
1
6
Credit 4.1
Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access
6
1
Credit 4.2
Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms
1
Credit 4.3
Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
3
Credit 4.4
Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity
2
1
Credit 5.1
Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat
1
1
Credit 5.2
Site Development—Maximize Open Space
1
1
Credit 6.1
Stormwater Design—Quantity Control
1
1
Credit 6.2
Stormwater Design—Quality Control
1
Credit 7.1
Heat Island Effect—Non-roof
1
1
Credit 7.2
Heat Island Effect—Roof
1
1
Credit 8
Light Pollution Reduction
1
1
3 1
1
5
0
5
Water Efficiency
Prereq 1 Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction Y RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
2
2
Credit 1
Water Efficient Landscaping
Possible Points:
10
F XFOWLE 2 to 4
1
Credit 6.2
Stormwater Design—Quality Control
1
Credit 7.1
Heat Island Effect—Non-roof
1
Credit 7.2
Heat Island Effect—Roof
1
Credit 8
Light Pollution Reduction
1
OPERATIONS & METRICS 1
LEED 1 1 5
0
5
Y 2
2
Water Efficiency Prereq 1
Water Use Reduction—20% Reduction
Credit 1
Water Efficient Landscaping
2
3
Possible Points:
10
2 to 4
Reduce by 50%
2
No Potable Water Use or Irrigation
4
2
Credit 2
Innovative Wastewater Technologies
2
1
Credit 3
Water Use Reduction
2 to 4
3
Reduce by 30%
2
Reduce by 35%
3
Reduce by 40%
4
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED 15
6 14
6
Improve by 30% 16% for New Buildings or 26% 12% for Existing Building Renovations
10 3
Improve by 32% 18% for New Buildings or 28% 14% for Existing Building Renovations
11 4
Improve by 34% 20% for New Buildings or 30% 16% for Existing Building Renovations
12 5
Improve by 36% 22% for New Buildings or 32% 18% for Existing Building Renovations
13 6
Improve by 38% 24% for New Buildings or 34% 20% for Existing Building Renovations
14 7
by 40% Renovations Energy andImprove Atmosphere 26% for New Buildings or 36% 22% for Existing BuildingPossible Points:
15 835
Improve by 42% 28% for New Buildings or 38% 24% for Existing Building Renovations
16 9
Y
Prereq 1
Improve Commissioning by 44% Buildings 40% Existing Building Renovations Fundamental BuildingorEnergy Systems 30% for Newof 26% for
17 10
Y
Prereq 2
Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% Minimum Energy Performance 32% 28% for Existing Building Renovations
18 11
Y
Prereq 3
Improve Refrigerant by 48%+ forNew NewBuildings Buildingsoror30% 44%+ Existing Building Renovations Fundamental Management 34% for forfor Existing Building Renovations
19 12
Credit 2 1
On-Site Renewable Energy Optimize Energy Performance Improve by 36% for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations
13 1 to 7 19
6
7
6
6
1% Renewable Improve by 38% for New Buildings or 34% forExisting ExistingBuilding Building Renovations Renovations 12%Energy 8% for
14 1
3% Renewable Improve by 40% for New Buildings or 36% 14%Energy 10% for Existing Building Renovations
15 2
5% Renewable Improve by 42% for New Buildings or 38% 16%Energy 12% for Existing Building Renovations
16 3
7% Renewable Improve by 44% for New Buildings or 40% 18%Energy 14% for Existing Building Renovations
17 4
9% Renewable Improve by 46% for New Buildings or 42% 20%Energy 16% for Existing Building Renovations
18 5
11% Renewable by 48%+ forNew NewBuildings Buildingsoror18% 44%+ Existing Building Renovations Improve 22% Energy for forfor Existing Building Renovations
19 6
2
Credit 3
2
Credit 4
3
Credit 5
On-Site 13%Renewable Renewable Energy Improve by 24%Energy for New Buildings or 20% for Existing Enhanced Commissioning 1% Renewable Improve by 26%Energy for New Buildings or 22% for Existing Enhanced Refrigerant Management 3% Renewable Improve by 28%Energy for New Buildings or 24% for Existing Measurement and30% Verification 5% Renewable Energy Improve by for New Buildings or 26% for Existing
Building Renovations
3 10
2
Credit 6
GreenImprove 7%Power Renewable by 32%Energy for New Buildings or 28% for Existing Building Renovations
2 4 11
9% Renewable Improve by 34%Energy for New Buildings or 30% for Existing Building Renovations
5 12
11% Renewable Improve by 36% Energy for New Buildings or 32% for Existing Building Renovations
6 13
13% Renewable Improve by 38% Energy for New Buildings or 34% for Existing Building Renovations
7 14
7
Credit 2
Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 2 Improve by 40% for New Buildings RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011 Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 2 Improve by 42% for New Buildings
Building Renovations
1 to 7 7
Building Renovations
2 1 8
Building Renovations
2 9
2 or 36% for Existing Building Renovations 15 F XFOWLE 2 or 38% for Existing Building Renovations 16
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED 9
3
2
Y 2
1
Materials and Resources Prereq 1
Storage and Collection of Recyclables
Credit 1.1
Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof
2 1 2
2
1
Reuse 75%
2
Reuse 95%
3
Credit 2
Construction Waste Management
1 to 2
Credit 3
Credit 5
50% Recycled or Salvaged
1
75% Recycled or Salvaged
2
Materials Reuse
1 to 2
Reuse 5%
1
Reuse 10%
2
Recycled Content
1 to 2
10% of Content
1
20% of Content
2
Regional Materials
2 1
Reuse 55%
1
2
1
1 to 3
Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements
Credit 4
2
14
Credit 1.2
2 2
Possible Points:
1 to 2
10% of Materials
1
20% of Materials
2
Credit 6
Rapidly Renewable Materials
1
Credit 7
Certified Wood
1
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED
1
1
11
0
4
2
10% of Materials
1
20% of Materials
2
Credit 6
Rapidly Renewable Materials
1
Credit 7
Certified Wood
1
Indoor Environmental Quality
Possible Points:
15
Y
Prereq 1
Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance
Y
Prereq 2
Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
1
Credit 1
Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring
1
1
Credit 2
Increased Ventilation
1
1
Credit 3.1
Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction
1
1
Credit 3.2
Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy
1
1
Credit 4.1
Low-Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants
1
1
Credit 4.2
Low-Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings
1
Credit 4.3
Low-Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems
1
1
Credit 4.4
Low-Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products
1
1
Credit 5
Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
1
1
Credit 6.1
Controllability of Systems—Lighting
1
1
Credit 6.2
Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort
1
1
Credit 7.1
Thermal Comfort—Design
1
1
Credit 7.2
Thermal Comfort—Verification
1
Credit 8.1
Daylight and Views—Daylight
1
Credit 8.2
Daylight and Views—Views
1
1
1 1
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
LEED 6
0
0
Innovation and Design Process
Possible Points:
6
1
Credit 1.1
Sustainability Education Program
1
1
Credit 1.2
Green Housekeeping Program
1
1
Credit 1.3
Exemplary Performance in Construction Waste Management
1
1
Credit 1.4
Ergonomic Assesment and Furniture
1
1
Credit 1.5
Mold control/ prevention or Other
1
1
Credit 2
LEED Accredited Professional
1
1
1
2
MR Cr.2 - Construction Waste Management (75%)
1
1
Credit 1.2
SS Cr.6.1 - Stormwater Design Quantity Control
1
1
Credit 1.3
SS Cr.6.2 - Stormwater Design Quality Control
1
Credit 1.4
Regional Priority: Specific Credit
1
1 21
Possible Points: 4
Credit 1.1
1
62
Regional Priority Credits
26
Total Certified 40 to 49 points
Possible Points: 110 Silver 50 to 59 points
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Gold 60 to 79 points
Platinum 80 to 110
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
2030 CHALLENGE 60% GHG emissions reduction by 2010 - Avg EUI of 48.0 kBtu/sf/yr 70% GHG emissions reduction by 2015 - Avg EUI of 36.0 kBtu/sf/yr 80% GHG emissions reduction by 2020 - Avg EUI of 24.0 kBtu/sf/yr
2030 CHALLENGE Targets: U.S. National Averages U.S. Averages for Site Energy Use and 2030 Challenge Energy Reduction Targets by Space/Building Type1 From the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Use this chart to find the site fossil-fuel energy targets
2
Primary Space / Building Type
Available in Average Target Source EUI4 (kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr) Finder3
2030 Challenge Site EUI Targets (kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)
Average Percent Electric
(kBtu/Sq.Ft./Yr)
50% Target
60% Target
70% Target
80% Target
90% Target
170
63%
76
38.0
30.4
22.8
15.2
7.6
280
63%
120
60.0
48.0
36.0
24.0
12.0
681
86%
225
112.5
90.0
67.5
45.0
22.5
90%
241
120.5
96.4
72.3
48.2
24.1
Average Site EUI4
Administrative / Professional & Government Office Education College / University (campus-level) K-12 School Food Sales
Convenience Store 753 (with or withoutSTRATEGIES gas station) CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011 RMH SUSTAINABLE Grocery Store / Food Market
F XFOWLE
Buildings Energy Data Book: 3.9 Educational Facilitie OPERATIONS & METRICS Table A: 2030 Challenge Interim Code Equivalents
2030 CHALLENGE
CODE / STANDARD
3.9.1
2003 Delivered Energy End-Use Intensities and Cons
COMMERCIAL
EUI breakdown for Typical Educational Facility
(national avg. ASHRAE source: DOE90.1-2004 - Buildings Energy Data Book 2009)
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 189 (in progress) IECC 2006 California Title 24 2005
Space Heating 30% below Cooling Ventilation Water Heating 25% below Lighting Cooking 0 Refrigeration Office Equipment 30% below Computers Other Total Note(s):
RESIDENTIAL (10^12 Btu) 389 47% 79 10% 83 10% 57 7% 113 14% 8 1% 16 2% 4 0% 30% below32 4% 39 5% 820 100% 13 15% - 20% below
(thousand Btu/S 39.4 8.0 8.4 5.8 11.5 0.8 1.6 0.4 4.0 3.4 83.1
1) Educational facilities include K-12 as well as higher educatio
14 A 50% GHG emissions reduction (pre-2010 goal) = 25% below ASHRAE 90.1-2007 10% below California Title 24 2008 Source(s): EIA, 2003 Commercial Building Energy Consumption and Expenditure = 9 LEED 2009 EA Points
3.9.2 Code15Interim Code Equivalents 25% below Table A:Oregon 2030 Energy Challenge Washington Energy Code CODE / STANDARD RESNET Index ASHRAE HERS 90.1-2004 LEED NC 90.1-2007 2.2 / Homes ASHRAE
2003-2004 Number Public K-12 Schools in the Uni 30%of below
Number of Schools (2004-2005) 25% - 30% below16 25% below RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Regular (1) 86,487 Special 1,635 65 or less Vocational 326 30% below Alternative 4,847 New - EA Credit #1: 6 pts Total (2) 93,295 HERS Index: 65 25% below
Average N Elementar Middle High Other
Renovation - EA Credit #1: 8pts
Note(s): New - EA Credit #1: 7 1) ptsRegular schools are those responsible for providing free pub Data Renovation - EA Credit2)#1: 9ptsis based on total number of schools reporting current s 96,296. Special focuses primarily on special education with ma 17 30%school below focuses students. A vocational technical RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011below 30% F X Fon OW L E or career sk PATH A, 8.1.1.1: 150pts IECCStandard 2006 GBI (in progress) students that typically cannot be met in a traditional school sett
LEED 2009 (in(in progress) ASHRAE 189 progress)
0
OPERATIONS & METRICS
BENCHMARKING RMH, Tulane University
64
Dinwidde, Tulane University
52
All Bldgs Constructed 2000‐2003* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Floor space 25,000‐50,000* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Office* CBECS 2003 Buildings with Principal Bldg Activity ‐ Education* CBECS 2003
74 65 83 76
NREL Model Medium Office (Pre 1980) DOE Commercial Benchmarks NREL Model Medium Office (Post 1980) DOE Commercial Benchmarks NREL Model Medium Office (New) DOE Commercial Benchmarks
70 63 51
Mgmt Bldg at Georgia Tech** Aud, classrooms, offices, bookstore, retail The Balzer Theater at Herren's** Rehabilitated historic building with offices and restaurant Heifer International Headquarters** Commercial Office Rinker Hall (School of Construction) at the University of Florida…
59 59 34 30 0
10
20
30 40 50 Total Energy Use Intensity (kBtu/sf)
60
70
80
*CBECS data do not distinguish between dry and humid. New Orleans is considered to be Climate Zone 5, with CDD 2000 and HDD<4000. **These buildings are in climate zone 3A, classified by ASHRAE as warm and humid. RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
90
OPERATIONS & METRICS
BENCHMARKING
WARREN HALL - CORNELL UNIVERSITY SUSTAINABILITY GOALS
LEED Silver
OR: Energy 50% below ASHRAE 90.1 – 2007
Upgrade all systems (including adding A/C) with no net energy use increase
SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEVEMENTS
Anticipated LEED Gold at minimum, Platinum likely
Energy Usage Baseline: 95.9 kBtu/GSF/yr Anticipated Performance: 52.2 kBtu/GSF/yr (50.3% Energy Cost below baseline)
Anticipated 19 of 19 points in LEED EAcr1
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
OPERATIONS & METRICS
RMH Goals
GROWTH AND CHANGE OUT OF THE BOX
HOLISTIC
RESPONSIVE TO OCCUPANTS CONSIDER COST AND PHASING
FORWARD THINKING
DESIGN AS A TOOL FOR PEOPLE AND PLANET
SYNERGISTIC
REASONABLE AND UNREASONABLE AMBITIOUS
PEDAGOGICAL PRECEDENT SETTING FOR CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY INTEGRATES OPERATIONS
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE
CHARRETTE 12:20-12:35 12:20-12:35 CONCLUSION
12:35-12:50 12:35-12:50 12:50-1:05 12:50-1:05
What’s next?
1:05-1:30 1:05-1:30 Day 1: March 22nd, 2011
1 Team
1:30-1:50 1:30-1:50 Presentation 1:50-2:00 1:50-2:00
FXFOWLE // FXFOWLE el dorado dorado el el dorado/SGH el dorado/SGH
RICHARDSON MEMORIAL HALL Occupancy/Survey Occupancy/Survey March 22nd-23rd 2011 Architecture Architecture Richardson Memorial Hall – Room 201
FXFOWLE/ FXFOWLE/ Andropogon Andropogon
Site and and Campus Campus Relationships Relationships Site
Transsolar/SGH Transsolar/SGH
Climate Analysis Analysis & & Passive Passive Design Design Climate
Altieri/FXFOWLE Altieri/FXFOWLE
Systems Systems
FXFOWLE/ 12:00-2:00 pm FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities Facilities Tulane Dean Schwartz/ 12:00-12:10 2:00-2:30 pm pm FXFOWLE 2:00-2:30
2 Q&A/Break Liz Davey/ 12:10-12:20 2:30-3:45 pm Collette Creppellpm 1 2:30-3:45 3 Breakout Groups Part
Operations and and Metrics Metrics Operations Introduction Tulane’s Environmental Initiatives
12:20-12:35
FXFOWLE / el dorado
Occupancy/Survey
12:35-12:50
el dorado/SGH
Architecture
Andropogon
Site and Campus Relationships
3:45-4:00 pm pm 4 Break 3:45-4:00
Groups Part 2 4:00-5:15 4:00-5:15 pm pm 5 Breakout FXFOWLE/ 12:50-1:05 Day 1 5:15-6:00 5:15-6:00 pm pm 6 Final Report Transsolar/SGH 1:05-1:30 7:00-9:30 pm pm 7:00-9:30 7 Dinner1:30-1:50
1:50-2:00
Day 2: March 23rd, 2011 2 Q&A/Break 2:00-2:30 pm
Climate Analysis & Passive Design
Altieri/FXFOWLE
Systems
FXFOWLE/ Tulane Facilities
Operations and Metrics
1 9:00-10:15 2:30-3:45 3 9:00-10:15pm am groups Part 3 am 8 Breakout Groups 4 3:45-4:00 pm 9 Break 10:15-10:30 am Break 10:15-10:30 am 4:00-5:15 pm 5 Breakout 10:30-11:45 am Breakout Groups Groups Part Part 2 4 10:30-11:45 am 10 6 11 7 12
Final ReportFinal Day 1Summary 5:15-6:00 pm 11:45am–12:00 pm pm Workgroup 11:45am–12:00 Dinner 7:00-9:30 pm Final Reports, Conclusions and Next Steps 12:00-1:15 12:00-1:15 pm pm (Town (Town Hall) Hall)
2:30–5:00 pm pm Day 2: March Afternoon 23rd, 2011 Sessions 2:30–5:00 Optional
TGIW 5:00 pm pm 5:00 Breakout groups Part 3 9:00-10:15 am 8 Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future”
Guy Geier, Geier, FXFOWLE FXFOWLE Lecture “Designing a Sustainable Future” Guy
9 Break 10:15-10:30 am
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
10 Breakout Groups Part 4 10:30-11:45 am
F XFOWLE
CONCLUSION
Whatâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s next?
group 1
group 2
group 3
group 4
group 5
Dan Maginn
Pete Pesce
Steve Salzer
Ilana Judah
TUES
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
TUES
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
WED
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
WED
Systems
Interior Organization and Function
Climate and Envelope
Site and Campus Relationships
Systems
2:30-3:45
4:00-5:15
9:00-10:15
10:30-11:45
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
Guy Geier
F XFOWLE
CONCLUSION
Q&A
Q&A
RMH SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES CHARRETTE, 22-23 MARCH 2011
F XFOWLE