[ INTRA ] STRUCTURE
US NATIONAL LACROSSE CENTER PROJECT BOOKLET
MICHAEL HOBGOOD & TYLER SHANNON
Table of Contents 0.0 Inroduction 0.1 Project Description 0.2 Program 0.3 Adjacency Diagrams 1.0 Site Analysis 1.1 Context 1.2 View Spills 1.3 WInd Analysis 1.4 Green Space Study 1.5 Circulation Methods 1.6 Public Transportation 2.0 Siting/Massing Options 2.1 Scheme One 2.2 Scheme Two 2.3 Scheme Three
3.0 Schematic Design 3.1 Site Plan 3.2 Floor Plans 3.3 Building Sections 3.4 Building Elevations 3.5 Renderings 4.0 Building Systems 4.1 Architectural Narrative 4.2 Structural Narrative 4.3 Wall Section 4.4 Mechanical 5.0 Schedule
0.1 Project Description For the first part of the semester both sections of the ARC 302 studio will be working on the same project - The ACSA 2010-2011 Steel Design Student Competition. There are two Categories offered in the competition. For the purpose of this studio, Category II - Open Submission is selected for a greater amount of flexibility. ARC302 students should adhere to the submission requirements of the competition. For more information related to this competition. The US National Lacrosse Center, a 75,000 SF building to be located in Baltimore, MD, is selected as the project for the Open Category. Lacrosse is the oldest game native to the North American continent and is now one of the fastest growing sports in the country. Maryland is the home of the national headquarters of US Lacrosse, the national governing body of men’s and women’s lacrosse. US Lacrosse desires to construct a new facility, US National Lacrosse Center, at the Inner Harbor area in downtown Baltimore. This will be the only National Lacrosse Center in the world. -“Steel should be used as the primary structural material with special emphasis placed on innovation in steel design”. -The design must look, feel, and represent the characteristics of the sport. -The facility shall provide the resources that the sport needs to prosper. -Provide an experience that is educational, informative and unique to the sport of lacrosse. -Take advantage of the site as an opportunity to gather together & celebrate the sport.
0.2 Program Public Spaces_ 23,930 sq. ft.
Lobby_2,000 sq. ft. Reception_180 sq. ft. Museum_15,000 sq. ft. Museum Director_150 sq. ft. Museum Archive_1,000 sq. ft. Archive Staff_150 sq. ft. Gift Shop_2,500 sq. ft. Gift Shop Storage_200 sq. ft. Gift Shop Manager_150 sq. ft. Hospitality Room_2,000 sq. ft. Hospitality Storage_300 sq. ft. Hospitality Catering_300 sq. ft.
Executive Administration_ 2,000 sq. ft. Director_300 sq. ft. Director’s Assistant_150 sq. ft. Director’s Meeting Room_500 sq. ft. Co-Op Office_150 sq. ft. Men’s Division_150 sq. ft. Women’s Division_150 sq. ft. Staff Workstation_450 sq. ft. Waiting Area_150 sq. ft.
Office- Operations_ 2,000 sq. ft.
Manager_200 sq. ft. Processing_150 sq. ft. Human Resources_150 sq. ft. Staff Workstation_1,500 sq. ft.
Office Marketing_ 2,450 sq. ft.
Manager_200 sq. ft. Market Service_150 sq. ft. Chapter Service_150 sq. ft. Communication Service_150 sq. ft. Staff Workstation_1,800 sq. ft.
Building Support_ 10,500 sq. ft.
Mail Room_500 sq. ft. Storage_10,000 sq. ft. Main Telecom Room_200 sq. ft. Telecom Closet_50 sq. ft. Electrical Closet_50 sq. ft. Men’s Room Women’s Room Mechanical
Exterior Facility Lacrosse Field Restrooms Bleachers
Office- Program Service_ 1,250 sq. ft. Manager_200 sq. ft. Sport Development_150 sq. ft. Special Events_150 sq. ft. Staff Workstation_1,800 sq. ft.
Office- Shared Spaces_ 6,800 sq. ft. Conference Room_3,000 sq. ft. Work Room_1,000 sq. ft. Break Room_1,500 sq. ft. Coat Closet_300 sq. ft. Training Room_1,000 sq. ft.
Total Square Footage before grossing
after grossing
A. public spaces
0.3 Adjaceny Diagrams recept gift storage lobby
gift gift manager
museum director archive archive
archive waiting area
museum
director’s meeting room
director assistant
director
hospitality storage hospitality hospitality catering coop
23,930 US Lax base adjacencies
mens division
womens division
2,000
A. public spaces
recept gift storage lobby
gift gift manager
museum director archive archive
museum
archive
hospitality storage hospitality hospitality catering
23,930 US Lax base adjacencies
Site Analysis
1.1 Context The site for the proposed US National Lacrosse Center is located in the Baltimore Harbor. It is in close proximity to the Baltimore Aquarium and other such tourist and commercial ventures. It acts as an anchor between this commercial area and the historic industrial area across the water.
Downtown Baltimore
Little Italy USS Constellation Baltimore Aquarium
Science Museum Private Harbor Residences
Site
Ayer Saint Gross Architects Domino Sugar Factory
.75
es
mil mil es mil es
.50
.25
23% residential
34% industrial
The site, being right on the water, has tremendous view of the harbor and its activities. 43% of the view is occupied by commercial area such as the inner harbor restaurants and aquarium. 34% of the view focuses on the industrial area across the harbor including the iconic Domino Sugar factory, and 23% of the view is focused northeast to the predominantly residential area.
43% commercial
1.2 View Spills
com
me
rcia l
residential
com
me
rcia l
industrial
residential site
industrial
hours per year
1.3 Wind Analysis
462+ The prevailing winds during the summer are from the west, and during the 415 winter are from the northwest
N 0º
11.25º
369 323 hours per year 277 231 138 46-
462+ 415 Due West 270º
90º
369 323 277 231 138 46-
summer 180º
S
N 0º
11.25º
e Du th
r No es W
t
31
5º
270º
90º
winter 180º
green space
land area
baltimore green space
green space
land area
boston
In an effort to better understand the scope of green space in Baltimore, a typological study was conducted, comparing Baltimore to other port cities. A three square mile sample was taken and analyzed from Boston and Copenhagen. This was able to show the inadequacies of the green space in Baltimore. It can be deduced that proposal for the given site must make use of some sort of public green space for the city of Baltimore.
land area
copenhagen
1.4 Green Space Study
1.5 Circulation Methods In an attempt to understand how people move through Baltimore, this study breaks down the circulation by pedestrian, vehicular, mixed, and private types. It becomes apparent that the site falls in the zone most frequented by pedestrians and the further away from the water the more vehicular traffic there is.
walk
ride walk mix ride no!
mix
taxi
no!
circulation pattern
taxi
circulation pattern
1.4 Public Transportation Studying the public transportation system of Baltimore can provide some insight on how people will be arriving on site. There are a number of options for the MTA bus most likely used primarily by local residents. The MTA metro stops in the heart of downtown near the inner harbor. There has also been talk be the city to develop some areas as transit oriented development zones. This would increase the number of people in the area of the site making more acessable.
MTA metro station: sub-terrainian rail line MTA bus stop
800
100
400
1600
proposed transit oriented development
0 200
M
M
site
Siting/Massing Options
2.1 Scheme One
pros -clear line of site to harbor from president street -field and headquarters are visible from the harbor -intuitive circulation in and out of site cons -field is vulnerable to wind -parking is great distance from entrance -limited expansion north, south, and west of field
2.2 Scheme Two
pros -oriented towards major harbor attractions -form is strictly derived from shore-line -provide most views of harbor -emphasizes the museum component by elevating on a more solid volume -adequate area available for future development in northwest corner cons -future development is limited by vehiclular acccess -field is vulnerable to wind
2.3 Scheme Three
pros -provides sufficient area for future development -lacrosse field is sheltered from the summer and winter winds cons -poor solar orientation i.e. north south scheme -parking is great distance from entrance -limited expansion north, south, and west of field
Schematic Design
3.1 Site Plan proposed foot bridge
future development proposed road system proposed green way
proposed US Lacrosse Center proposed lacrosse field proposed shore line 1”=150’
3.2 Floor Plans
1:60
1. office 2. terrace 3. museum 4. hospitality 5. atrium 6. lobby 7. gift shop
DN
5
1
2
1
DN
third floor
5
3
4
DN DN
second floor
7
6
DN
DN
first floor
3.3 Building Sections
40'
40'
40'
40'
First Floor 7’-0” 0’-0” Basement 3.3 -7’-0”Building Sections
40'-0"
longitudinal section 1/32”=1’-0”
24’-0”
24’-0”
24’-0”
Roof 71’-0”
Third Floor 51’-0”
Second Floor 31’-0”
First Floor 7’-0”
24'-0"
Basement -7’-0” A
3.4 Building Elevation
3.5 Building Renderings
Building Systems
4.1 Architectural Narrative
Our site is very much an edge condition. It is situated on the boundary between old and new. It is involved in a conversation with the water just as much as it is with the land it engages. On one side, the city is commercial oriented, another residential, and yet across the water is the industrial epicenter. Our proposal will act as a threshold between these typologies providing a meeting place for all. Similarly, lacrosse is a sport dealing with edge conditions. It is overshadowed by more popularized American sports, however the it is experiencing tremendous growth and is in a position where it must bridge the gap between its history and its promising future as a more prominent American sport. Public infrastructure has historically been a catalyst for economic development and social capital. One such example is the use of green space and urban plazas to effectively encouraging social interactions and forge stronger community ties. In compliance with the Baltimore City master plan aimed at battling population loss and concentrated poverty, our proposal will seek to establish such an infrastructure. The proposed urban fabric will set up a strong orthogonal grid only to be broken by an off axis green way connecting the main land to our proposal, while providing sufficient green space for the public that is otherwise lacking in Baltimore. The US National Lacrosse Center will be sited perpendicular to this green way, though elevated so as to allow the public space to flow to the harbor.
4.2 Structural Narrative As steel is the main focus of the competition we designed the US National Lacrosse Center to celebrate the building material. The design does this in three ways.
WIND
WIND
WIND WIND
WIND
!
GRAVITY
GRAVITY
WIND
WIND
GRAVITY
WIND
WIND
WIND WIND
WIND
WIND
WIND
Finally, the structure takes on a more expressive form, differing from the normal boxed truss in that the center turns inward transferring the load to the floor diaphragm.
GRAVITY
GRAVITY
GRAVITY
WIND WIND WIND
GRAVITY
Secondly, the structure is brought to the outside of the building envelope making it more prominent on the exterior while freeing up space on the interior.
GRAVITY
First the large steel truss is elevated. Not only does this allow for the green way to flow under the building in compliance with the architectural intent, but it also draws attention to the seemingly elevated and unsupported steel.
WIND
WIND
!
WIND
WIND
WIND
DEFLECTION DUE TO WIND WIND
DEFLECTION DUE TO WIND
PROPOSAL
STRESS DUE TO GRAVITY
STRESS DUE TO GRAVITY
WIND
! !
TYPICAL SOLUTION UNUSED STRUCTURAL POTENTIAL
TYPICAL SOLUTION UNUSED STRUCTURAL POTENTIAL
PROPOSAL
PRE-FAIL TRUSS AT WEAKEST POINT PRE-FAIL TRUSS AT WEAKEST POINT
REDISTRIBUTE PORTION OF LOAD TO EXISTING DIAPHRAGM REDISTRIBUTE PORTION OF LOAD TO EXISTING DIAPHRAGM
RESULT: THINNER AND MORE EXPRESSIVE STRUCTURE RESULT: THINNER AND MORE EXPRESSIVE STRUCTURE
SECOND FLOOR 27’-0”
THIRD FLOOR 47’-0”
ROOF 67’-0”
4.3 Wall Section
BASEMENT FLOOR -7’-0”
FIRST FLOOR 7’-0”
4.4 Mechanical The building is broken up in to two zones. Zone One on the west side is controlled by Air Handling Unit One and Zone Two on the east is controlled by Air Handling Unit Two. The chillers are to be housed on the roof and the air handling units are in the basement with the boilers. We are employing a sub-floor air distribution system utilizing low density air flow. We have put the air return in the ceiling, allowing for continuous circulation and optimum temperature control.
4.4 Mechanical
third floor
1/32”=1’-0”
DN
program type: office DN
second floor
1/32”=1’-0”
program type: museum, hospitality
first floor
1/32”=1’-0”
program type: lobby, commercial
return chase supply chase supply duct work
supply duct return duct
CHILLER 1
AHU 1
CHILLER 2
B
AHU 2
B
Project #1 Schedule
5.0 Schedule
ARC 302 Architectural Design - Technolog Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
1/10 1/12 1/14 1/17 1/19 1/21 1/24 1/26 1/28 1/31
1. Project Introduction
2/2
Project Introduction
2. Site Analysis / Program Adjacency
Site Analysis / Program Adjacency
3. Formation of Teams
Formation of Teams
4. Site Visit in Baltimore
Wee
Site Visit in Baltimore
5. Steel Structures and Site Design
Steel Structures and Site
6. Registration
Registration for Competi
7. Disscions on Steel Structures 8. Reivew - Siting/Massing Options 9. Concept & Schematic Design 10. Review - Concept & Schematics 11. Building Systems 12. Documentation for Final Review 13. Final Review
Discussions on Stee Review
gy
Spring 2011
ek 4
2
2/4
2/7
Week 5
Week 6
Week 7
2/9 2/11 2/14 2/16 2/18 2/21 2/23 2/25 2/28
Week 8 3/2
3/4
3/7
Week 9
3/9 3/11
Design
ition
el Structures
Concept & Schematic Design Review Building Systems Documentation Final Review Spring Break
Michael Hobgood | Tyler Shannon | School of Architecture | North Carolina State University | 2011