The UCSD Guardian 11/13/18

Page 1

VOLUME 52, ISSUE 7

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018

WWW.UCSDGUARDIAN.ORG

UC SYSTEM

PHOTO TEASE TITLE IX, TRUMP, AND SEXUAL GOESASSAULT HERE

UC Librarians Bargain with University for New MOU Contracts Librarians from throughout the UC system handed out materials and spoke about their wage disparities to passersbys outside Geisel. BY Madeline leon

staff Writer

PHOTO BY NAME HERE /GUARDIAN

The Trump

CAPTION PREVIEWING THEadministration ARTICLE PAIREDhas WITH proposed changes Title THE PHOTO TEASE.toFOR EXAMPLE IF THE of PHOTO IX law in favor a new WERE OF A BABY YOU campus sexual assault WOULD SAY “BABIES SUCK! policy slated to do more THEY ARE WEAK AND

harm than good. SECTION, Features,PAGE page_6

BLINKY POLE

OPINION TEASE AUSUALLY self-Aware Statement BEBAS NEEDS TWO SPACES Opinion, Page 4 SECTION, Page _

SDAFF

OFTENStaple A SPORTS Yearly In asianTEASE Media wutPage is a basket-ball? A&E, 9 section, Page _

FOREFORECAST

MONDAY TUESDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY

96 LL 72 HH 77 52

68 H H8086LL52

WEDNESDAY FRIDAY THURSDAY THURSDAY 79 L L 67 HH81 52

79LL 53 66 HH77

VERBATIM VERBATIM “This was a perfect PULL A QUOTE FROM opening week for the A Tritons COLUMNasHERE! theyFOR go 2–0 EXAMPLE, ‘I DON’T on the young season, UNDERSTAND WHY ALLIE having defeated CAN’T ASCRIBE WORDSaTO very toughUSAGES. Western THEIR PROPER ’ -KELVIN NORONHA” Washington squad, which they name may face - Columnist here again in the NCAA COLUMN TITLE HERE Tournament at the end SECTION, PAGE _ of the year. ” Lucas Armstrong

PAGE 15

INSIDE INSIDE LTE................................4 TEXT ...................................X ASIAN FILMS................9 OPINION SOMETHING.X STRESSED OUT..........11 WEEKEND/FEATURE .....X BEFORE I GO..............12 CROSSWORD/SUDOKU X W.SOCCER BASKETBALL.........15 A BALL! WOW X

What Hath God Wrought, the newest Stuart Collection piece, stands above the trees in Revelle Plaza. // UCSD Guardian

CAMPUS

Student Sues UCSD Over Academic Integrity Decision

R

By Lauren Holt Managing Editor

oger Revelle College student Lok Tin Wang filed a lawsuit against UC San Diego and math professor James Dilts on Nov. 2, alleging that Wang was incorrectly held to have violated the university’s academic scholarship policy and that he was deprived of his right to due process at his Academic Integrity Review Board hearing. Sentenced to a $50 fine, academic integrity trainings, and disciplinary probation, Wang is petitioning the San Diego Superior Court to reverse the AIRB’s finding and is not seeking any financial damages. According to the lawsuit, the AIRB determined that it was more likely than not that Wang violated the Policy on Integrity of Scholarship, which sets the standard for what is considered “cheating,” by using answers to homework sets in Dilts’ Math 170A class during Winter Quarter 2018 that Dilts had previously posted online in another quarter. Wang contests this decision on the basis that he had already begun, but ultimately did not complete, Math 170A with Dilts in a prior quarter, and the problems assigned as homework were identical in both quarters. Dilts admitted in an incident description that was presumably submitted to the Academic Integrity Office that he has “essentially used the same homework for several terms” and that he “posted [the homeworks] on the course website, but removed them at the end of the term.” Michael Richter, the attorney representing Wang,

told the UCSD Guardian that Wang’s reference to the past materials posted online did not constitute cheating because “the instructor re-used the same homework, so the student [already] knew the answers.” Richter also placed the blame for the incident on Dilts, stating that he was “too lazy to change the numbers.” Duc Trinh, a representative of Richter, expressed the same view of Dilts’ responsibility. “All he had to do is change one number,” Trinh explained to the Guardian. “Change something in the problem. [He’s] a lazy professor.” Trinh further stated that after this initial lawsuit on the academic integrity violation is resolved, Wang plans to proceed with a defamation lawsuit against Dilts specifically. Defamation lawsuits allege that the defendant has made false statements about the plaintiff in such a way that damage the plaintiff ’s reputation. Although the majority of the court documentation on the lawsuit is dedicated to disputing the AIRB’s supposedly wrongful decision, the only argument made by Richter that is actually grounded in legal theory is the claim that Wang’s constitutional right to due process was violated at the AIRB hearing when the AIRB would not allow Richter to attend the hearing instead of Wang. “On October 5, 2018, a hearing was held with See LAWSUIT, page 3

A.S. COUNCIL

A.S. Senators Consider Doubling Stipends Without Student Input A handul of A.S. senators pushed a proposal to increase their own stipends without having distributed a necessary survey. BY clarisse Vasquez

contributing writer Several A.S. senators proposed doubling the stipends for senators from $20 to $40 during the Week five meeting without seeking feedback on the raise from the student body, but the measure was opposed by many of the other council members and ultimately voted down. The possibility of raising the stipends by $10 was brought up at the meeting to pass the summer budget, and a survey to distribute to students to

gather input on the increase was created. However, the survey was never actually sent out and still has zero responses. The main proponents for doubling stipends were Thurgood Marshall College A.S. Senator Brandon Milledge and Division of Arts and Humanities Senator Johnny Echavarria. Milledge ran on a platform of eliminating A.S. stipends entirely when he campaigned for his position during last year’s elections. According to Milledge, the executive branch requested the

drafting of a survey to register student sentiments regarding the raise. Milledge alleges that while surveys distributed by A.S. Council do allow the representatives to make informed decisions about issues concerning students, this particular survey was intended as a mechanism by the executive members to stall the senators from raising stipends. Milledge also said to the UCSD Guardian that the executives personally gain by not raising See STIPENDS, page 3

A Bargaining Committee for Unit 17 in the University Council American Federation of Teachers is currently in the process of negotiating for a fairer Memorandum of Understanding. The MOU is the contract between UC Office of the President and Unit 17 of UC-AFT that explains employees’ salaries, abilities, and rights during an employment period. After a prevailing number of 11 bargaining sessions so far, librarians and faculty across the ten University of California campuses are meeting with UC negotiators in order to discuss amending a variety of 13 propositions presented by Unit 17’s Bargaining Committee. UC-AFT is the union consisting of more than 3,000 faculty members and 300 librarians at the ten University of California campuses who strive for better wages, working conditions, and academic freedom rights. Unit 17 of UC-AFT is the sector specifically made of more than 350 librarians from these UC campuses. Through a Bargaining Committee that was created in October 2016, Unit 17 has been focused on improving their Memorandum of Understanding with UCOP. The current MOU in debate originally went into effect on Oct. 1, 2013 and expired Sept. 30, 2018. With a total of 34 articles, seven appendices, and six side letters, the MOU is a list of contracts between UC-AFT and UCOP ranging from employee salary to holidays and sick leave. Between October 2016 and February 2018, the Unit 17 Bargaining Committee curated a list of proposals to present to UCOP. On April 2, 2018, both UCOP and Unit 17 proposed their own amendments to the current MOU in attempts to negotiate a more agreeable contract. The Bargaining Committee’s list of proposals represents areas of focus in the bargaining session, based on current articles in the current MOU. The proposals consist of a variety of issues including housing benefits, academic freedom, salary, corrective action, work arrangements, and professional development. The Bargaining Committee presents these proposals to the UC system negotiation team in attempt to legally amend the articles for future Memorandums. “The goal of the Bargaining Committee is a fair contract for UC librarians that ensures adequate compensation and respect as academic appointees of the University of California,” UC San Diego Supervisory Archivist Laurel McPhee said. “In this round of bargaining, our focus has been on securing academic See LIBRARIANS, page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.