UDOT 2016 STIP Workshop

Utah Department of TransportaĆ&#x;on

2016 - STIP Workshop

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

TABLE of CONTENTS PROCESS STIP Process STIP Process Yearly Calendar STIP Charts Utah Code — Commission Duties PROGRAM Pavement Program 2016 – 2019 Structures Program 2016 – 2020 Grant Requests Fast Act Overview Strategic Direction & Performance Metrics Federal Program State Program PROJECTS Choke Points and Other Priorities TIF Choke Point Pavement Bridge HSIP Operations and Safety TAP Freight Rail Federal Other State Other

3 4 5 6 12 13 14 15 18 26 37 39 40 48 56 76 88 96 112 118 122 130 153

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROCESS

Page 3

PROJECT SPECIFIC APPROVAL FUNDS C. Year

New STIP FY 2017

TIF Statewide List (Program Development)

Current Year

Statewide List (with Regional Priority)

Commission Approved List

Statewide List (Structures)

New This Year *

CH OKE POI NT

BRIDGE

FR E I G H T Statewide List (Program Development)

Preliminary Programs

Region Lists

S T B G P ( T A P )

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

PROGRAM LIST APPROVAL FUN DS C. Year

New STIP FY 2017

H I G H V O L U M E

Current Year

L OW V OL U M E Commission Approved List

ASSE T

*

SAFE T Y S T A T E P R O G R A M S

Years vary by program

Any New Project Funded, Not on FFY 17 STIP Lists, Requires Commission Action Preliminary Programs

CONT I NG E NCY

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROCESS

Page 5

Utah Code 72-1-303. Duties of commission‌...

(1) The commission has the following duties: (a) Determining priorities and funding levels of projects in the state transportation systems for each fiscal year based on project lists compiled by the department; (c) Holding public hearings and otherwise providing for public input in transportation matters; (2) (a) For projects prioritized with funding provided under Sections 72-2124 and 72-2-125, the commission shall annually report‌. (i)

A prioritized list of the new transportation capacity projects in the state transportation system and the funding levels available for those projects; and

(i)

the unfunded highway construction and maintenance needs within the state.

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROCESS

Page 7

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROCESS

Page 9

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROCESS

Page 11

Pavement Program Recommendations 2016

Estimated

Estimated

2017

2018

Estimated

2019

Notes

Funding

Federal Amount State Pavement HVR State Pavement LVR Code 1 Maintenance Total State & Federal

$ $ $ $ $

203,574,886 12,000,000 17,000,000 10,000,000 242,574,886

$ 192,075,114 $ 650,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 242,725,114

$ 188,050,000 $ 1,950,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 240,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

186,850,000 3,150,000 40,000,000 10,000,000 240,000,000

dTIMS Model Recommendation for Pavements

LVR & HVR combined

$

217,000,000

$ 240,000,000

$ 240,000,000

$

240,000,000 maintaining High and Low Volume pavement conditions for

$

10,000,000

$

10,000,000

$

10,000,000

$

10,000,000 Maintenance Managment Quality Assurance (MMQA)

$ $ $

17,000,000 30,000,000 160,000,000

$ 40,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 160,000,000

$

40,000,000

$

40,000,000

$ 190,000,000

$

190,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

2,592,500 1,232,500 1,785,000 11,390,000 17,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $

6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000

Low Volume Roads

$ $ $ $ $

32,000,000 40,000,000 35,200,000 52,800,000 160,000,000

$ 38,000,000 $ 47,500,000 $ 41,800,000 $ 62,700,000 $ 190,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

38,000,000 47,500,000 41,800,000 62,700,000 190,000,000

High Volume Roads

Choke Point & Other Priorities $

25,574,886

UDOT Maintenance LVR Program HVR Program Distributions 15.25% 7.25% 10.50% 67.00% 20.00% 25.00% 22.00% 33.00%

4/12/2016

Major Rehabilitation Distributed to Regions

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4

Region Proposed Spilts

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4

(45 / 55) (40 / 60) (35 / 65) (55 / 45)

6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000

$ 32,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 35,200,000 $ 52,800,000 $ 160,000,000

$

2,725,114

Funding available in 2016, and recommended by dTIMs for 2017-2019.

2016 and 2017, Programmed HVR Major Rehab. Project High Volume Roads to reach the $207M available in 2016, and $230M (2017 2019) dTIMs recommendation

Total $

28,300,000

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 13

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 14

Utah Department of Transportation Programming - FAST Act Highway Program 2016-2020 Summary and Impact on Utah January 27, 2016

Highway Program Highway funding: After several years of flat funding, the FAST Act provides modest increases to states over the five-year life of the bill. While Utah’s apportionment in the first year of the FAST Act will rise by five percent to $352 million from the current $335 million, the majority of that increase is apportioned to a new category of funding to address freight mobility needs. More modest increases of 1 to 2% will be realized in existing funding categories. After the initial increase, overall funding rises by about two percent per year until the bill’s final year ($385 million in FFY 2020). Distribution formulas were not changed in FAST Act. It should be noted that apportionments don’t reflect the actual funding that will be available on an annual basis through obligation limitations provided through annual appropriations.

Freight: FAST Act creates two new programs designed to help states and local governments plan for and fund freight mobility projects.

National Highway Freight Program (NEW): The National Highway Freight Program is distributed to states by formula for highway freight improvement projects. UDOT will receive $10 million in the first year of this program, with steady increases to over $13 million in FFY 2020. This is funding is intended to direct more resources to freight movement. States, in cooperation with US DOT are directed to designate a national freight network consisting of all Interstates, an additional 41,000 primary freight network highway miles. States are required to use formula dollars to complete a State Freight Plan, either standalone or part of a state’s long-range transportation plan. Utah has recently completed a freight plan (See Utah Freight Plan. The plans must be updated every 5 years. States can use up to 10 percent of these funds for intermodal and freight rail projects.

Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) (NEW): This is a new competitive grant program. Authority for selection is administered by the FHWA. Projects that cost the minimum of at least $100 million, 30 percent of a state’s apportioned total, are eligible. In addition, 10 percent of total funding is reserved for small projects and 25 percent is set aside for rural projects. Multimodal, non-highway projects are eligible for grants but a cumulative $500 million cap on these type projects over the five year authorization is set. Federal share is limited to 60 percent of project cost, though other federal dollars can be used as non-Federal match as long as the total amount of Federal dollars, do not exceed 80 percent of project cost. Congress retained the authority to veto any projects proposed for this grant funding. Eligible applicants include states, large Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), local governments, ports, tribal governments, or combinations of these organizations.

State freight advisory committee: The Secretary of Transportation shall encourage each State to establish a freight advisory committee consisting of a representative cross-section of public and private sector freight stakeholders, including representatives of ports, freight railroads, shippers, carriers, freight-related associations, third-party logistics providers, the freight industry workforce, the transportation department of the State, and local governments. Role of the Committee: ● Advise the State on freight-related priorities, issues, projects, and funding needs

● ● ● ●

Serve as a forum for discussion for State transportation decisions affecting freight mobility Communicate and coordinate regional priorities with other organizations Promote the sharing of information between the private and public sectors on freight issues Participate in the development of the freight plan of the State described in section

Surface Transportation Program conversion: FAST Act changes the name of the Surface Transportation Program to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP). Along with the name change come other important updates: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP): The amount going to local governments increases 1% per year from 51 percent to 55 percent over the life of the bill, decreasing the state’s share of these funds. The FAST Act maintains the off system bridge set-aside. This will result in an increase in funding to Utah MPO’s and JHC. Transportation Alternatives Program: Under current law, the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a standalone program for funding bike, pedestrian, and other alternative projects. FAST Act deletes the existing federal authorization for TAP and moves it into the STBGP as a set-aside.

Nationally TAP is currently funded at $820 million annually; FAST increases that figure to $835 million in FY 2016 and FY 2017 and then to $850 million per year. Project eligibility continues to include bike trails and transit oriented projects but is also expanded to include local transportation safety initiatives.

Non-Profits are also now eligible to apply for this set aside for STBGP funding. The recreational Trails program set-aside maintained as a portion of these funds. Require a “competitive process” to be able to distribute. Large MPO’s may flex up to 50% of their funding for any STP-eligible project. Also adds the requirement that MPO’s must distribute, “in consultation with the relevant state”.

The National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): Consistent with MAP-21, the NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward achievement of performance targets established in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS. A new provision allows for improvements to bridges that are on-system, non-NHS. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ): The FAST Act makes several small changes to CMAQ. These changes include: expanding the diesel retrofit program to equipment and vehicles that are port-related; exempting low-population states from PM 2.5 attainment requirements in certain instances; and allow for the use of CMAQ funds to be used not only for attainment of ambient air quality standards but also to maintain standards in an attainment area.

Highway Safety Improvement Program: The FAST Act eliminates the current eligibility for HSIP funds to be used for certain types of non-infrastructure safety programs, such as education and enforcement activities.

Planning, Performance Measures, and Asset Management: ● Eliminates the need for State DOTs to collect safety data and information on unpaved/gravel roads. ● If a State DOT does not achieve or make significant progress toward achieving targets in any performance measurement area after one reporting cycle, State must submit a report describing the actions they will undertake to achieve their targets in the future. ● No significant changes to the performance-based planning process established in MAP-21. ● Expands the scope of the planning process to include addressing resiliency and reliability as well as enhancing travel and tourism of the transportation system. ● Requires State DOTs to incorporate the performance measures of a transit agency not represented by a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) into its long range transportation plan regardless if it is in an urban or rural area.

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 16

Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP): FLAP funding starts at an annual $250 million nationwide under FAST Act – the same as current levels. Funding then steps up by $5 million annually to $270 million by 2020.

The current distribution formula for the program is highly favorable to Utah, and that formula was not changed by the act.

Environmental Streamlining- Project Delivery: The Act retains the improvements in the environmental review and planning process to expedite project delivery made in MAP-21 and adds new reforms.

The Act makes numerous changes that allow more projects to be included as “Categorical Exclusions” (CE) which is a far quicker and less involved environmental review. The Act included multi-modal projects and rail projects as CEs and indexes to inflation the size of projects that can be covered by a CE. The Act allows states that have opted to take responsibility for the Federal NEPA environmental review (California and Texas so far with several other applying) to use their own state environmental process as long as it’s as stringent as the NEPA process.

US DOT and other Federal lead agencies are given more authority to set schedules, deadlines and establish more coordination between agencies with review responsibilities. The Act also aligns environmental reviews for historic properties.

The Act allows for actions and reviews taken during the planning stage to be used to satisfy requirements during the environmental stage. Also limits the need to consider project alternatives during the environmental process if they have been considered during the planning process.

Regulatory requirements under NEPA and other federal regulations for the repair or reconstruction of a bridge, road, highway railway or transit facility damaged by an emergency can either be waived or expedited.

The Act allows states to bundle similar bridge projects into one project and award as a single Transparency: Creates a new requirement for states to provide an annual report on all projects over $25 million comparing the estimated cost at the beginning of the project with its final cost and includes an explanation about revisions in scope or other factors impacting project costs or overruns.

FURTHER INFORMATION Contact: Bill Lawrence @ (801) 964-4468, BillLawrence@utah.gov

STRATEGIC DIRECTION and PERFORMANCE METRICS

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 18

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 20

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 22

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 24

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 25

4/12/2016

2016

Estimated

Estimated

2017

2018

Estimated

2019

UDOT Federal Program (Including Match) Total

$

305,100,000

$

310,800,000

$

316,400,000

$

Choke Point

$

35,000,000

$

47,486,147

$

47,848,852

$

53,321,859 Program Recommendations - Capacity

Bridge

$

18,000,000

$

25,000,000

$

33,000,000

$

33,000,000 Program Recommendations - Structures

Freight

$

10,618,122

$

10,363,739

$

11,305,897

$

12,719,134 Required Program Type - Freight

Planning & Res

$

8,663,263

$

8,700,000

$

8,700,000

$

Safety

$

23,525,503

$

24,384,857

$

24,849,162

$

322,800,000

8,700,000 Required Program Type - Planning and Research 25,304,670 Required Program Type - Safety

STP-TA Set-a-side

$

2,181,919

$

2,253,835

$

2,109,780

$

2,368,028 Required Program Type - Transportation Alternatives

STP-TA SR2S

$

536,308

$

536,308

$

536,308

$

536,308 Program Recommendation - Safe Routes To Schools

Signs & Culverts

$

3,000,000

Balance for High Volume Roads & Other Priorities

$

203,574,886

$

192,075,114

$

188,050,000

$

Program Recommendations - Signs & Culverts 186,850,000 Program Recommendations - Pavements & Other Priorities

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 26

Federal Program Funding & Projections **DRAFT** Commission STIP Workshop Preparation 2016 Pavement & Bridge Programs

FEDERAL AID – FFY 17 $359.5 Million*

$264.6 $ 288.6

+ $22.2

$310.8

Million

Million $47.5

M Choke Pt.

(Federal + Match )

$30

$

UDOT

$288.6

Million

+

(Match required to obtain total programming level)

$8.6

$25.0

302.2 Million

Match $22.2 Million

M Maj. Rehab.

M Bridge

$2.7

M Choke Pt. & Other Priorities $159.4

Million High Volume Roads

Million Freight $10.4 Million

Local & Pass Through $70.9 Million

State Plan. & Research $8.6 M

STP-TAP Conv. TAP $2.8 Million Safety $24.4 Million

*2017 Apportionment Estimate Updated April 2016

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 32

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 34

DRAFT

Chokepoints and Other Priorities Recommended List

Region PIN Project Name 1 14407 SR‐39; Dual Lefts at Washington 1

2

3 4 4

SR‐235; Intersection Improvements 14408 at 2700 North

I‐80; Parley's Summit to Jeremy 11828 Ranch WB Truck LN

SR‐114; Realignment & Signal at 400 12159 N in Orem US‐6; EB Passing Lane MP 291.7 to 12577 293.7 14366 SR‐9; West Rockville, WB Passing

4

SR‐276; Ferry Ramp Extensions

4

US 6; Helper to Blanding

S

Statewide Zero Fatalities Campaign

1 1

Additional Needs SR‐101; Texas turndowns and 14517 guardrail upgrades 14527 I‐15; Barrier Extensions, Ogden

1

14539 SR‐167; Mill & Fill; Various Area

1 1

14507 SR‐30; Texas Turndown Removal 14535 SR‐105; Mill & Fill, MP 0.3‐.035

2

13456 SR‐248 to Bearhollow

2

$5,000,000 Wildlife mitigation

This project is currently funded for $17M but we are asking for additional funds for Wildlife mitigation.

There have been several hits of wildlife along this part of I‐80 and UDOT as well as the community here is concerned about this and wants to come up with some solutions.

$6,500,000 Eliminate "S" Curve & Install Warranted Signal

This is the project we really want, but we can't obligate it soon enough, so we plan to do the two pavement projects below first and then do this project in place of some future pavement projects.

$3,500,000 Passing Lane $3,000,000 Passing Lane Extend Halls Crossing Ramp, Relocate Bull Frog $3,300,000 Ramp & Ferry Engine Retrofit

$2,000,000 Zero Fatalites Campaign

$500,000 Texas turndowns and guardrail upgrades $1,000,000 Barrier extensions on the I‐15 Ramps at 5600 Fix failing pavement in various locations on $200,000 Trappers Loop (SR‐167) Remove Texas Turndowns on SR‐30 in Box Elder $500,000 County $150,000 Repair failing pavement spots on Parrish (SR‐105)

$10,000,000 Widen Bridge

13454 SR‐209; Redwood rd to Jordan river

$250,000 For curb & gutter and bike lanes

2 2

I‐215 @ 3900 S. 13762 Replace Cattle Guards

$4,000,000 Increase the merge length $450,000 Replace Failing Cattle Guards in Tooele County

3

12310 SR‐45; MP 14 to Glen Ranch Rd.

$3,000,000 1 1/2 inch mill, HMA, Microsurface

3 4

12196 14327

4

12605

4

14365

4

14334

4

14381

SR‐73; Tooele‐ Utah Co. Line to MP 25 Cedar Fort I‐15; Flexible Delineators, MP ‐ MP US‐191; 400 N. Moab to Colorado River Bridge SR‐59; Connecting 2 Passing Lanes, MP 17.3‐17.8 SR‐118; Bridge Widening Over Sevier River I‐15; Wildlife Fencing and Cattle Guards

Total =

From existing fiber backbone, extend fiber to Maintenance Stations for communications and new CCTV cameras between Helper and Blanding.

Federal HSIP funds are no longer eligible for this program. The recommendation is to trade $2 Million of state pavement dollars in the LVR, and put in STP federal funds. This will be funded by the increase due to FAST Act.

$28,300,000

$300,000 For drainage repair

SR‐111 @ 7600 S.

Comments

$2,000,000 Intersection and turning lane improvements

$500,000 ATMS Fiber and ITS devices

Total =

2

Funds Concept $2,500,000 Add dual left turning movements in alll directions

This money would be combined with an OB project to do the drainage repair at the same time SR‐111 goes under a narrow RR bridge where the lanes are narrower and basicly no shoulder. This project would widen that bridge and the pavement to get full shoulders and lane widths.

This money would be combined with an OB project.

This project is where I‐80 EB goes to I‐215 SB. This project would improve the merge area at 3900 S. as the traffic has a decision point at 3900 S. and I‐215.

We want to move this project up from 2017 to 2016.

1 inch Mill, 1 1/2 inch HIR, 1 1/2 inch HMA, Chip We want to add $2.5M to this existing 2016 project $2,500,000 Seal to extend the limits. $500,000 Replace existing Delineators with the flexible type $13,500,000 Widen Existing Facility, Drainage $850,000 Passing Lane Extension $800,000 Widen Structure, New Parapets Install Deer Fence, Double Cattleguards, North of $2,900,000 Cedar City

$41,400,000

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 39

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Transportation Investment Fund (TIF) FUNDING

State year: July 1

TIF funding is primarily used for improving or optimizing capacity.

Projects built using TIF finding also qualify for maintenance using TIF funding.

Programmed funding 2016 $273 million 2017 proposed: $331 million 2018 proposed: $405 million 2019 proposed: $425 million 2020 proposed: $434 million 2021 proposed: $430 million 2022 proposed: $447 million 2023 proposed: $472 million

CONTACT

Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS The TIF has funded many projects that are important to current and future mobility needs, including the Mountain View Corridor, a planned freeway in western Salt Lake County and northwestern Utah County.

MVC will have phased implementation to address short-term regional needs, and will eventually be a 35mile freeway from I-80 in Salt Lake to Lehi Main Street.

During initial construction of MVC in Salt Lake County, UDOT built two lanes in each direction from Redwood Road to 5400 South.

The fund was created in the 2005 Special Session by House Bill 108 and contains revenue from legislative appropriations, sales tax and vehicle registration fees.

In 2005 8.3 percent of sales tax revenue and half of auto-related sales tax was added and in 2011, 30 percent of sales tax growth was added.

Once projects funded by the Centennial Highway Fund and Critical Highway Needs Fund are complete, the remaining balance transfers to the TIF.

Other recent projects: Santaquin Main Street, Phase 2 SR-145, Pioneer Crossing Extension SR 26, Riverdale Road over the Rail Road Funding Code: TIF

Page 40

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 41

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 43

Region 1 42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

§ ¦ ¨ 84

91

218 89

13224

81

30

83

38

Logan

C A C H E 30

Randolph

23

102 240

B O X

R I C H

101

165

13

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

10491 39 158

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

13037

Ogden

222

167

11481

13822

D AV I S

11477

M O R G A N

11771

11946

13480

13823

Morgan

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

13824

66

11225

T O O E L E

Coalville Bountiful

67

Wendover

S A L T

S U M M I T

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016-2023

TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund

15

142

23

13055

§ ¦ ¨

Garden City

C A C H E WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

R I C H

Huntsville

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

SALT LAKE

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨

65

Salt Lake City

S U M M I T

11828

150

14413

80

201

36 112

12566

Tooele

Kamas

10603

11827 9418

35

10020 Draper

Heber City

36

10935

150

12587

14412

11203

196

32

40 Park City

248

14412

Grantsville

T O O E L E

13963

8314

138

224

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund

M O R G A N

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

Helper

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016-2023

WEBER B O X

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

RICH

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

191

S A LT L A K E

Grantsville

44

Park City

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

12158

13608

T O O E L E

144

113

92

§ ¦ ¨ 11982

92

146

Lehi

Heber City

D U C H E S N E

35

WASATCH

Provo

10266

89

13394

Tabiona

U TA H

13391

208

Eureka

40

11358

!

88 45

U I N T A H

198 6 !

6

6

36

13385

Myton

Duchesne

68 141

149

40 !

87 Roosevelt

Springville

77 Vernon

Naples

121

189

10689

Vernal

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

SANPETE

132

132

C A R B O N Helper

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

E M E R Y

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Delta

Scofield

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

M I L L A R D

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016-2023

TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

191

T O O E L E

U T A H

Eureka Mona

132

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

174

28

89

260

99

257

Kanosh

§ ¦ ¨ 70

Salina

E M E R Y

Green River

19 Crescent Jct.

Emery

§ ¦ ¨

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

Richfield

128

119

15

118 161

24

Monroe

70

Milford

24 Moab

72

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

21

6 !

Ferron

10

SE VI ER

118

§ ¦ ¨

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

11978

Clawson

137

50 100

Cleveland

Sterling

Holden

M I L L A R D

GRAND

124 155

Castle Dale

Gunnison

159

122

57

29

123

Marysvale

PIUTE

TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund

Manti

50

Sunnyside

Wellington

Huntington

Hinckley

50

Price

Ephraim

136

U I N T A H

157

13664

31

Hiawatha

117

125 Delta

116

Helper

264

Fairview

Region 4

CARBON

Scofield

Levan

132

191

96

89

Nephi

J U A B

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

6

313

25

279 Loa

W A Y N E

Hanksville

Bicknell Beaver Minersville

62

153

10787

21

11979

Antimony

130

I R O N

56

G A R F I E L D Boulder

Parowan

46 24

22

89

20

Torrey

Junction

95 211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219 18

11438

§ ¦ ¨ 15

11467 17 Hurricane

13909 7

12780

S A N

89 Glendale

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

J U A N 95

10788

10783

Blanding

Tropic

276

9

9

191

95

14

W A S H I N G T O N 10792

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016-2023

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Choke Point FUNDING

Federal year: October 1

Federal Choke Point funds support projects that relieve localized reoccurring traffic congestion.

Programmed funding 2016: $35.0 million 2017 proposed: $47.5 million 2018 proposed: $47.8 million 2019 proposed: $53.3 million 2020 proposed: $53.3 million

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS The U.S. 89 Improvements in Orem and Pleasant Grove widened State Street to seven lanes, repaved with new asphalt, and upgraded with curb, gutter and new sidewalks in various locations. The project improved traffic flow and reduced congestion in the area with only minor traffic delays during construction.

US-89 was widened to seven lanes in Pleasant Grove and Orem.

Choke points, which occur in rural and urban areas across the state, impinge on economic productivity by delaying delivery of goods and services and slowing commute times. Traffic congestion can also contribute to a less-safe driving environment as drivers break or change lanes suddenly to jockey for position.

Sometimes, choke points contribute to poor air quality through stop-and-go driving patterns which result in higher emissions.

Projects are scored, ranked and presented to the Utah Transportation Commission for approval of funding within a given STIP year. Scores are based on, average annual daily traffic, constructibility, region priority, level of service and safety.

Fund Code: NHPP STP

Page 48

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 49

FY 2017~2020 CHOKEPOINT PROJECTS Reg 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3

County WEBER DAVIS DAVIS DAVIS VARIOUS SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH

Route 0134P 0015P 0103P 0068P 0089P 0209P 0171P 0089P 0209P 0111P 2074P 2932P 0074P 0089P 0198P 0077P

BMP EMP 11.243 326.611 0 63.65 406.247 6.8 3.36 363.77 7.8 10.118 5.45 0 0 345.05 10.464 6.627

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

WASHINGTON VARIOUS IRON IRON CARBON ROUTE ERROR WASHINGTON KANE

0034P 1.56 0191P 112.5 0015NR05903 0 0130P 6.296 0006P 224 0089P 124.1 0009P 21.2 0089P 46

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIN 12508 12656 10706 12674 13592 12560 12563 12561 13578 12565 14431 13668 11219 9994 10265 13421

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12844 11433 12576 11532 13408 13409 14363 14364

Project Location SR-134; MP 11.24 - 11.45 I-15; MP 326.61 - 328.35 SR-103; MP .00 - .17 SR-68; MP 63.65 - 64.37 US-89; MP 406.25 - 406.41 SR-209; MP 6.80 - 8.00 SR-171; MP 3.36 - 3.69 US-89; MP 363.77 - 364.79 SR-209; MP 7.80 - 8.80 SR-111; MP 10.12 - 10.60 Cnty:FA-2074; MP 5.45 - 5.60 & SR-210; MP 2.00 - 2.50 Cnty:FA-2932; MP .00 - .14 & US-89; MP 349.91 - 350.29 & SR-73; MP 35.85 SR-74; MP 0.00 - 1.02 US-89; MP 345.05 - 347.45 SR-198; MP 10.46 - 11.57 SR-77; MP 6.63 - 7.20

Project Description SR-134; I-15 interchange modifications I-15; NB Aux Lane Rest Area to 200 N., Kaysville SR-103; SR-126 to I-15 SR-68; I-215 to Center St. US-89; I-84 EB Off-ramp Intersection I-15, 9000 South Interchange SR-171 (3500 South) & 5600 West Intersection US-89, 11400 South to 10600 South SR-209; 90th S- State St. to 700 E. SR-111, SR-201 to 2700 South SR-210 @ Wasatch Dr. Lehi Main & State St. Intersection Area SR-74; Main St. to 740 North, American Fork US-89; State St., 220 So P.G. to 500 East A.F. SR-198; Woodland Hills Dr to Arrowhead Trail in SF SR-77 400 S Springville; SF Main to I-15

Project Value $ 4,500,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 4,672,000 $ 6,132,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 13,800,000 $ 6,698,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 7,022,196 $ 12,990,599 $ 6,800,000 $ 4,400,000

Planned Year 2017 2017 2018 2019 2019 2017 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020

SR-34; MP 1.56 - 1.80 US-191; MP 112.50 - 124.00 TO SR-56 CEDAR CITY; MP .00 - .19 & I-15; MP 58.73 - 59.26 SR-130; MP 6.30 - 9.00 US-6; MP 224.00 - 224.60 US-89; MP 124.10 - 124.40 SR-9; MP 21.20 - 22.90 US-89; MP 46.00 - 49.00

SR-34; St. George Blvd. 900 East to 1000 East US-191; South Moab to Blue Hill I-15; Exit 59 Improvements SR-130; North Cedar to MP 9 US-6; Turn Lanes at Price Cyn. Rec. Area Access US-89; Jct. SR-12 NB Improvements and Lighting SR-9; Mid-Way, EB & WB Passing Lanes US-89; NB Passing Lane, MP 46-49

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020

2,700,000 4,000,000 4,650,000 4,500,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 50

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 51

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

§ ¦ ¨ 84

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

218

15

89

81

30

83

38

30

Logan

Randolph

240

B O X

R I C H

101

165

13

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

39 158

12508

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

Ogden

222

167

10706 13592

M O R G A N Morgan

12656

D A V I S

84

Farmington

66

T O O E L E

Coalville Bountiful

12674

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨

67

S A L T

S U M M I T

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Choke Point

C A C H E

23

102

30

Region 1

Garden City

C A C H E

R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

M O R G A N

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T SALT LAKE

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨ 80

12565

Salt Lake City

12563

65 150

224

12586

138

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

Grantsville

36 112

T O O E L E

21 12561

Tooele

Draper

14431

35 Heber City

1- 13578 2- 12560

196

150

36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

Helper

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Choke Point

D A V I S

80

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

144

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

73

11219

113

92 Lehi

92

146

Heber City

Vernal

35

WASATCH

Naples

121 Tabiona

13668

189

UTAH

208

Provo

Myton Duchesne

77 13421Springville

40 !

U I N T A H

198 6 !

Eureka

88 45

10265 141

36

40

40

9994

68

40 !

87 Roosevelt

89 Vernon

149

6

6

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

Scofield

Helper

132

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

S A N P E T E

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

Delta

C A R B O N

132

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Choke Point

S A LT LA K E

Grantsville

191

6 WASATCH D U C H E S N E U T A H

Eureka Mona

J U A B

132

Scofield

Mount Pleasant

Levan Moroni

132

174

Hiawatha

Huntington

Hinckley Manti

50

28

89

57

29

Sterling

137

50 100

§ ¦ ¨

Kanosh

§ ¦ ¨ 70

Green River

E M E R Y

G R A N D

19

§ ¦ ¨

Crescent Jct.

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

Richfield

128

119 118

161

24

Monroe

70

Milford

24

Marysvale

PIUTE

11433

Moab

72

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

6 !

Emery

SE VI ER

15

21

10

260

118

Cleveland

Ferron

Salina

99

257

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

124 155

Clawson

Holden

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Choke Point

159

123

Region 4

U I N T A H

Castle Dale

Gunnison

50

Wellington

122

Ephraim

136

CARBON

157

Price

31

117

125 Delta

116

Helper

264

Fairview

191

13408

96

89

Nephi

313

25

279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell

Beaver Minersville

62

153

24

22

89

Antimony

130

12576

Parowan

13409

11532 Cedar City

143

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

Hurricane

7

211

Monticello

276

491

Escalante

12

12 63

14363 9

191

95

Blanding

Tropic

S A N 276

262

261

Glendale

K A N E

9

162

89 59

J U A N 95

89 17

12844

95

14

WA S HI N G TO N

St. George

46

Panguitch

Enterprise

219

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

W A Y N E

21

20

56

Torrey

Junction

162

316 191

Kanab

14364

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

High Volume Roads (HVR) Program FUNDING

The HVR Program supports a prescriptive and cost-effective resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation strategy that restores structure, prolongs the service life, and enhances the safety of existing roadways.

Programmed funding: 2016: $148.00 million Federal $12.00 million State $160.00 million total Proposed funding: 2017: $159.35 million Federal $.65 million State $160.00 total 2018: $188.05 million Federal $1.95 million State $190.00 total 2019: $186.85 million Federal $3.15 million State $190.00 total

The HVR Program is a combination of he historical Preservation, Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation programs for the Interstate system and other high volume roads. Identified projects must follow the appropriate Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation design processes.

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

CONTACT

UDOT’s Central Asset Management Division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for each region.

Each region then considers its needs and prepares a list of preservation and rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. Federal funding provides the majority of the funding for these projects Project list and funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for approval at the March or April commission meeting.

Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

High Volume Pavement Condition (4,015 Mi/ 19,080 SA) 100% 90% 80%

ACCOMPLISHMENTS % of Miles

High volume roads carry more than one thousand vehicles or 200 trucks per day. In in 2015 UDOT completed 1,610 lane miles of work on HVR.

70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Poor: IRI > 170 in/mi

7

6

6

6

6

7

6

6

6

5

Fair: IRI 95 to 170 in/mi

40

35

35

36

37

36

34

35

33

35

Good: IRI < 95 in/mi

54

59

59

58

57

58

60

60

61

60

Long Range Goal: < 10 % Poor

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

Long Range Goal: > 50 % Good

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

50

Ride quality is evaluated using the International Roughness Index, the standard for measuring ride quality on a generic vehicle. IRI calculations reflect relative comfort of the riding surface based on longitudinal road profile and vehicle speed.

PIN: 88073, 8074, 10031, 11731

Page 56

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Low Volume Roads (LVR) Program State year: July 1 Programmed funding: 2016: $17.4 million 2017 proposed: $40 million 2018 proposed: $40 million 2019 proposed: $40 million

CONTACT

Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Low volume roads carry fewer than one thousand vehicles per day. In 2015, UDOT completed 725 lane miles of work on LVR.

The LVR Program supports a prescriptive and cost-effective resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation strategy that restores structure, prolongs the service life, and enhances the safety of existing roadways.

The LVR Program is a combination of our historical Preservation, Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation programs for the Low Volume roads. The identified The LVR Program is a combination of our historical Preservation, Rehabilitation & Major Rehabilitation projects must follow the appropriate Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation and programs for the Low Volume roads. The identified projects will still need to follow the appropriate Major Rehabilitation design process.

Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation & Major Rehabilitation design process.

UDOT’s Central Asset Management division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project UDOT’s Central Asset Management division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for each region. Each region then considers their region needs and prepares each region. a list of preservation and rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. State funds from the new gas tax will be providing all of the funding for these projects. For the past few years UDOT Each region then considers its needs and prepares a list of preservation and had a very limited amount of projects for these roads, and most of the surfacing work was being rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. Project list and performed with UDOT crews.

funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for

approval at the March or April commission meeting.

Project list and funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for approval at

the March or April commission meeting.

State funds from the new gas tax provide all of the funding for LVR projects. For the past few years UDOT had a very limited amount of projects for these roads, Accomplishments: in 2015 UDOT completed 725 surface areas of work on the LVR and most of the surfacing work was being performed with UDOT crews.

And here’s an updated chart extended to 2020

Low Volume Pavement Condition (1,865 Mi/ 4,410 SA) 100% 90% 80% 70%

% of Miles

FUNDING

60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Poor: IRI > 170 in/mi

20

21

23

25

27

28

27

26

23

22

Fair: IRI 95 to 170 in/mi

59

58

57

57

57

53

50

47

47

46

Good: IRI < 95 in/mi

21

21

20

18

16

19

23

27

30

32

Long Range Goal: < 20 % Poor

80

80

80

80

80

80

80

80

80

80

Long Range Goal: > 30 % Good

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

Ride quality is evaluated using the International Roughness Index, the standard for measuring ride quality on a generic vehicle. IRI calculations reflect relative comfort of the riding surface based on longitudinal road profile and vehicle speed.

PIN: 5927, 5928, 5929, 5936, 6632, 8071, 8072, 10032

Page 57

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 61

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 64

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 65

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

§ ¦ ¨ 84

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

Region 1

Garden City

218

15

89 30

83

38

30

Logan

13468

C A C H E

30

Randolph

23

102 240

12287

13

B O X

R I C H

101

89 !

E L D E R

13733

Brigham City

39

Woodruff

16

89

39 158

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

13471

Ogden

13469

222

13470 167

D AV I S

12284

M O R G A N

12279 13466

Morgan

12283

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

13467

66

T O O E L E

13472 67

S A L T

Wendover

Coalville

S U M M I T

Bountiful

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation

Pavement High Volume Roads

81

C A C H E R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

M O R G A N D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T

12496 Salt Lake City

Wendover

11501

§ ¦ ¨

65 150

13753

80

1

201

SALT LAKE

138 Grantsville

36 112

T O O E L E

Tooele

9447

2 3

1- 13521 2- 12498 3- 13458

224

40

9713

32 Kamas

Park City

150

11185

35

Draper

13150

Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Helper

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation

Pavement High Volume Roads

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

S A LT LA K E

Grantsville

44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

Heber City

144

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Lehi

73

12196

92

146

13648

10218

89

13647

121 Tabiona

Roosevelt

10220

Eureka

40

Myton Duchesne

88 45

13621

198

40 !

12316

6 !

36

40 !

87

13622

149

208

68 141

Naples

Springville

77

12314

Vernal

35

WASATCH

13645

12312Provo 12246

UTAH

Vernon

92

12162

11345

113

6

U I N T A H

191 89

10217

Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

Helper

132

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

S A N P E T E

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

Delta

C A R B O N

Scofield

132

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation

Pavement High Volume Roads

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

191

T O O E L E

U T A H

Eureka Mona

174

Fairview

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

Delta

116

11531

12470

89

29

Manti

28

159

M I L L A R D

§ ¦ ¨ 161

260

99

257

Richfield

13356 11527

GRAND

124 155 Cleveland

6 !

13329

Castle Dale

§ ¦ ¨ 70

Ferron

E M E R Y

Green River

19 Crescent Jct.

Emery

§ ¦ ¨

§ ¦ ¨ 70

163 !

128

12471

14277

118

24

24

Monroe

Marysvale

123

12477

Moab

72

70

Milford

13328

Salina

119

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

Sunnyside

14285

11528

Mayfield

SE VI ER

Kanosh

57

256

Fillmore

13360

21

137

50 100

Huntington

Clawson

Holden

12475

122

Sterling

Gunnison

50

Wellington

PIUTE

Region 4

U I N T A H

Pavement High Volume Roads

13331

50

31 Hiawatha

Ephraim

157 Price

117

136

Hinckley

Helper

264

132

125

CARBON

Scofield

Levan

132

191

96

89

Nephi

J U A B

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

6

25

14301

279 Loa

W A Y N E

Hanksville

Bicknell Beaver

62

153

Torrey

21

14310

Minersville

22

89

20

Antimony

130

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

56

46 24

Junction

Parowan

95 211

276

Monticello

13340

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

13330

7

S A N 276

9

9

14283

262

261

K A N E

13376

162

89 59

J U A N 95

Glendale

Hurricane

13332

Blanding

Tropic

89 17

191

95

14

WA S H I N G TO N

St. George

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

§ ¦ ¨ 84

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

218

15

89

81

38

30

C A C H E

23

102

30

Logan

Randolph

13861

240

R I C H

165

13

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

39 158

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

Ogden

222

167

SUMMIT

M O R G A N Morgan

D A V I S

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

66 Coalville Bountiful

T O O E L E

67

65

SALT LAKE Wendover

Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program

Pavement Low Volume Roads

30

83

B O X

Region 1

Garden City

C A C H E R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

M O R G A N D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T Salt Lake City

Wendover

65 150

§ ¦ ¨ 80

201

S A L T

138

224

L A K E

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

Grantsville

150

36 112

T O O E L E

35

Tooele

Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

11509 Vernon

11510

11508 Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

Helper

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program

Pavement Low Volume Roads

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T

S A LT LA K E

Grantsville

44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

144

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

113

92 Lehi

92

146

73

Heber City

Vernal

35

WASATCH

Naples

121 Tabiona

U T A H

189 208

Myton Duchesne

Springville

77

40 !

141

88 45

68

U I N T A H

198 6 !

Eureka

40

40

89

36

40 !

87 Roosevelt

Provo

Vernon

149

13859

6

6 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

Scofield

Helper

132

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

S A N P E T E

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

Delta

C A R B O N

132

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program

Pavement Low Volume Roads

Salt Lake City

Wendover

191

T O O E L E

U T A H

Eureka Mona

132

174

Huntington Manti

50

28

89

57

29

159

Sterling

137

50 100

260

99

257

Kanosh

Salina

19 Crescent Jct.

Emery

§ ¦ ¨

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

24

Monroe

70

Marysvale

PIUTE

279 Loa

W A Y N E

62

153

Torrey

Hanksville

13781

46

SAN JUAN

Junction

21 22

89

Moab

313

25

Bicknell

20

128

24 72

§ ¦ ¨

Milford

Minersville

Green River

13782

118

Beaver

E M E R Y

119

161

B E A V E R

70

Richfield

15

21

§ ¦ ¨

Ferron

10

SE VI ER

118

§ ¦ ¨

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

6 !

Clawson

Holden

M I L L A R D

Cleveland

Castle Dale

Gunnison

50

GRAND

124 155

Pavement Low Volume Roads

Hinckley

123

122

14316

Ephraim

136

Sunnyside

Wellington Hiawatha

117

125 Delta

31

Region 4

U I N T A H

157 Price

Mount Pleasant

116

Helper

264

Fairview

Moroni

CARBON

Scofield

Levan

132

191

96

89

Nephi

J U A B

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

6

95

Antimony

211

130

I R O N

56

G A R F I E L D

Parowan

Boulder

Panguitch

14318 Cedar City

143

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

63

17

276

9

9

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

Blanding

13779

95

Glendale

7

Tropic

89

Hurricane

191

95

14

WA S H I N G TO N

St. George

491

14318

12

Enterprise

219

Escalante

Monticello

276

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program

C A C H E R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T SALT LAKE

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨ 80

201

Salt Lake City

65 150

9419

224

138

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

Grantsville

150

36 112

T O O E L E

35

Tooele

Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

Helper

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I 0

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

200 Miles

Project Year 2017

Pavement Major Rehab. Program

M O R G A N

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 75

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

Federal and Combined Funds

Bridge Replacement, Rehabilitation & Preservation The Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program uses state and federal funding to replace, rehabilitate, and inspect bridges.

Programmed funding 2016 $26.5 Million Proposed funding: 2017 $40.0 Million 2018 $48.0 Million 2019 $48.0 Million 2020 $48.0 Million

CONTACT

Rebecca Nix 801-633-2810 RNix@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Fiscal Year 2015 funds were used for replacing the Clarion Road Local Government Structure in Centerville, and continued funding for replacing six structurally deficient structures on the South Davis Corridor project.

This program will continue to fund the bridge inspection program. Upon approval of the FY 2020 program, all state owned bridges currently classified as structurally deficient will be programmed for rehabilitation or replacement.

The South Davis Improvement Project replaced aging bridges at 2600 South, 1500 South, 500 South, and 400 North in Bountiful.

This program funds the systematic replacement, rehabilitation or preservation of existing bridges to address deficiencies due to aging and deterioration.

The load rating and inspection programs, which are also funded through this program, ensure that bridges are in adequate condition to accommodate anticipated traffic needs.

Bridges are ranked based on deficiencies observed during biannual bridge inspections. Projects are ranked based on bridge condition, load rating, AADT, significance, and delay factors. Region requests, Region projects and local government requests are also considered when selecting projects.

This program funds the replacement, rehabilitation and preservation of all state owned bridges as well as local bridges on the federal aid system.

â&#x20AC;&#x192;

Fund CodeS: ST_BRIDGE, NHPP_BR, STP_BRIDGE

Page 76

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 77

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 78

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 79

42

Snowville

30

200

61

13518

Trenton

142

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

218

15

89

81

30

83

38

30

Randolph

240

13524

R I C H

101

165

13

B O X

C A C H E

23

102

30

Logan

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

39 158

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

Ogden

222

167

M O R G A N Morgan

12415

D A V I S

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

66

13793

T O O E L E

12416

Coalville Bountiful

67

Wendover

S A L T

S U M M I T

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Bridge Preservation Program

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Region 1

Garden City

C A C H E R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T

12418

12418

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨

65 150

14345

80

12442

201 138 36 112

Tooele

12443

14347

S A L T

Grantsville

T O O E L E

Salt Lake City

224

14344

L A K E

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

14346

150 35

Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

Helper

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Bridge Preservation Program

M O R G A N

WEBER B O X

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

RICH

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

Bountiful

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

S A LT L A K E

Grantsville

191 44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

Draper

Heber City

14411

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

92 Lehi

92

146

73

Vernal

35

WASATCH

Naples

121 Tabiona

U T A H

189 208

Myton Duchesne

Springville

77

40 !

141

88 45

68

U I N T A H

198 6 !

Eureka

40

40

89

6

6

36

12609

Roosevelt

Provo

Vernon

40 !

87

149

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

SANPETE

132

132

C A R B O N Helper

Fairview

13159 Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

E M E R Y

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Delta

Scofield

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

M I L L A R D

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Bridge Preservation Program

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville

T O O E L E

U T A H

Eureka Mona

132

Mount Pleasant

174

Price

Manti

50

28

89

57

29

159

Sterling

137

50 100

99

257

13805

260

Salina

Richfield

118

Milford

Crescent Jct.

70

163 !

24

Monroe

Marysvale

PIUTE

128

24 Moab

72

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

21

13804

19

§ ¦ ¨

SEVIER

119

Green River

Emery

70

15

161

E M E R Y

§ ¦ ¨

Kanosh

70

Ferron

10

118

§ ¦ ¨

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

§ ¦ ¨

Clawson

Holden

M I L L A R D

6 !

Castle Dale

Gunnison

50

GRAND

124 155 Cleveland

Bridge Preservation Program

Huntington

Hinckley

123

122

Ephraim

136

Sunnyside

Wellington Hiawatha

Region 4

U I N T A H

157

31

117

125 Delta

116

Helper

264

Fairview

Moroni

CARBON

Scofield

Levan

132

191

96

89

Nephi

J U A B

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

6

313

25

14178

279 Loa

W A Y N E

12603

Hanksville

Bicknell Beaver Minersville

62

153

22

89

Antimony

130

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

46 24

21

20

56

Torrey

Junction

Parowan

95 211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

S A N

Hurricane

9

9

276

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

J U A N 95

Glendale

7

Blanding

Tropic

12439

17

191

95

14

WA S H I N G TO N

St. George

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

§ ¦ ¨ 84

142 91

23 218

15

89

81

30

83

12389 30

38

30

C A C H E Randolph

23

102

11476

240

R I C H

101

165

13

B O X

Logan

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

39 158

12446

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

Ogden

14263

222

167

14264

SUMMIT

M O R G A N

14348

Morgan

D A V I S

12624

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

66 Coalville Bountiful

T O O E L E

67

65

SALT LAKE Wendover

Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation

§ ¦ ¨

Region 1

Garden City

C A C H E

R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

13324

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

11419

13323

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨ 80

13794

201

2 1

138 36 112

Tooele

S U M M I T

65

13796

9419

224

14398

Grantsville

T O O E L E

1- 13800 2- 14355

Salt Lake City

12445

150

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

S A L T

L A K E

150 35

Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

Helper

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation

M O R G A N

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

S A LT LA K E

Grantsville

44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

144

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

113

92 Lehi

92

146

73

U T A H

12444

Heber City

Vernal

35

Naples

WASATCH

121 Tabiona

Roosevelt

208

77

12390

Springville 11475

Myton Duchesne

40 !

141

U I N T A H

198 6 !

Eureka

88 45

68

36

40

40 Provo

Vernon

40 !

87

189

149

6

6

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

Scofield

C A R B O N

132

Helper

132

Fairview

13799

Price Levan

78

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

S A N P E T E

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

Delta

Wellington

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

191

Eureka

U T A H

Mona

132

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

116

Helper

264

Fairview

13799

31

Hiawatha

50

28

89

57

29

159

Sterling

257

70

Green River

E M E R Y

G R A N D

19

§ ¦ ¨

Crescent Jct.

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

Richfield

128

119

15

118

24

Monroe

70

Milford

24 Moab

72

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

§ ¦ ¨

Emery

SE VI ER

161

21

10

260

Kanosh

6 !

Ferron

Salina

118

§ ¦ ¨

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

99

14354

137

50 100

Cleveland

Clawson

Holden

M I L L A R D

124 155

Castle Dale

Gunnison

50

123

Marysvale

PIUTE

Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation

Huntington Manti

Sunnyside

Wellington

122

Ephraim

Hinckley

Region 4

U I N T A H

157 Price

117

136

CARBON

Scofield

132

125 Delta

191

96

Levan

174

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

89

Nephi

J U A B

6

313

25

279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell

Beaver Minersville

62

153

24

22

89

Antimony

130

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

W A Y N E

46

21

20

56

Torrey

Junction

Parowan

95 211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

Blanding

12448

S A N 276

89 17

Hurricane

9

9

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

J U A N 95

Glendale

7

Tropic

191

95

13797

14

WA S HI N G TO N

St. George

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Highway Safety Improvement Program FUNDING Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $23.5 million 2017 proposed: $24.4 million 2018 proposed: $24.8 million 2019 proposed: $25.3 million

CONTACT W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov

The federally-funded Highway Safety Improvement Program supports infrastructure and non-infrastructure efforts that have the potential to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

Projects may be on any public roadway at a location, show a positive estimated benefit to cost ratio, and conform to the State Strategic Highway Safety Plan.

UDOT collaborates with FHWA to select and oversee projects.

Infrastructure projects typically include: • Installing features (barrier, rumble strips, warning signs, and pavement markings) that prevent or mitigate run-off-road crashes • Removing or protecting roadside obstructions • Upgrading traffic signals to protected left turn phasing or flashing yellow arrows to remove conflict points • Widening intersections to add turn lanes Non-infrastructure projects include: • Education efforts, such as the Zero Fatalities campaign, that address unsafe driving behaviors • Program management • Crash database development • Crash prediction models and other studies that identify future infrastructure project locations

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Every life lost due to traffic deaths continues to affect us all.

Educating drivers to avoid dangerous driving behaviors and implementing measures to improve safety can help bring us closer to our goal of Zero Fatalities.

While overall traffic fatalities are down since 2000, that number has increased in the last three years.

PIN: 6019 Fund Code: HSIP

Page 88

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 89

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 90

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 91

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

84

Region 1

Garden City

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

C A C H E

218

15

89

81

30

83

38

14449

Logan

30

12614 Randolph

23

102

30

240

B O X

R I C H

101

165

13

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39

89

16

13486 39 158

14454

§ ¦ ¨ 15

W E B E R Huntsville

Ogden

222

MORGAN 13488 14452 Morgan

D A V I S T O O E L E

84

Farmington

66

Coalville

14453

Bountiful

67

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨

S A L T

S U M M I T

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program

§ ¦ ¨

14451

C A C H E

R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville

1- 14670 2- 14456 14455

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨ 80

138

S U M M I T Salt Lake City

14460 14457 14459

14458

Bountiful

2

65

1

T O O E L E

Tooele

14461

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

150

14664

36 112

224

13308

13597

Grantsville

150

S A L T L A K E

35 Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

CARBON Scofield

Nephi

S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

Helper

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program

M O R G A N

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

Bountiful

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

S A LT LA K E

Grantsville

Kamas

222 144

§ ¦ ¨ 15

113

Heber City

13490 14563

Vernal

35

WASATCH

92

146

73

Naples

121

13601

14463

Tabiona

189

11394

2

Springville

77

Eureka

40

Myton

UTAH

Duchesne

40 !

88 45

U I N T A H

198 6 !

36

14464

208

68 141

149

40 !

87 Roosevelt

1- 14462 2- 14109

Provo

89 Vernon

1

92 Lehi

191

40 !

Draper

T O O E L E

44

DUCHESNE

Park City

32 Tooele

191

6

6

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

Scofield

Helper

132

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

S A N P E T E

M I L L A R D

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

Delta

C A R B O N

132

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville

Eureka Mona

Mount Pleasant

132

116

Moroni

136

Hiawatha

Manti

50

28

89

57

29

Holden

118 Kanosh

§ ¦ ¨ 15

§ ¦ ¨

13492 14447 14448 14426

B E AV E R

119 24

E M E R Y

§ ¦ ¨ 70

Green River

14443

G R A N D

19

Crescent Jct.

163 !

70

Marysvale

PIUTE

14425

24 72

§ ¦ ¨

Milford

6 !

70

SEVIER

Richfield

Monroe

13447

Cleveland

§ ¦ ¨

70

14446

13237

21

Emery

260

118 161

10

Salina

99

155

Ferron

256

Fillmore

257

Mayfield

137

50 100

Sunnyside

Clawson

Gunnison

M I L L A R D

123

124

Castle Dale

Sterling

Wellington

Region 4

U I N T A H

157

122

Huntington

13501

CARBON Price

31

14424

Ephraim

Hinckley

159

Helper

HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program

117

125

50

13494

264

Fairview

Levan

Delta

96

Scofield

132

174

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

89

Nephi

J U A B

6

U T A H

Moab

313

25

279

14445

Loa Hanksville Bicknell

14423

Beaver

21 Minersville

I R O N

Torrey

24

Junction

W A Y N E

SAN JUAN

13491 22

89

20

G A R F I E L D

Antimony

13040

130

14444

Parowan

56

153

62

Boulder

211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch

14427

13493

Escalante

191

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨

WA S HI N G TO N 17 Hurricane St. George

7

13495

Blanding

276

89 Glendale

13448

Tropic

14

15

18

46

9

9

K A N E

162

89 59

262

261

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Signal Maintenance & Operations FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2015: $5 million 2016: $3 million 2017 proposed: $ 3 million 2018 proposed: $ 3 million

The Traffic Signal Maintenance and Operations Program optimizes mobility, improves safety and strengthens the economy by improving traffic flow, reducing stops, increasing the visibility of traffic signals, and optimizing traffic signal timing for special events and businesses.

CONTACT

Mark Taylor 801 887-3714 marktaylor@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT is moving toward world-class traffic signal management with the following results: Over 50% of UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s traffic signals are configured with radar detection that picks up cyclists waiting at the red light.

Real time management of traffic signal operations deployed at most intersections.

Traffic Signal Event Management improves delay. BYU game-day delays are reduced from 120 to 70 minutes per vehicle.

Reflectorized traffic signal backplates have been installed at many intersections. Research shows the backplates improve visibility and reduce crashes by 15 percent.

Downtown Salt Lake City

Recent initiatives: Traffic Signal Event Management - UDOT has reduced delay during events by working with local venues and deploying signal timing plans to handle changes in travel demand.

Reflectorized Traffic Signal Backplates - Transparent yellow tape is now placed around traffic signal backplates to help increase signal transparency.

Increased Proactive Maintenance - Potential problems are addressed before road users experience inconvenience.

Real-Time Traffic Signal Operations Management - Volumes, speeds, and other metrics are collected and signals are adjusted in real-time. UDOT is one of just a few agencies nation-wide using these tools, and recently and recently received the AASHTO Innovation Initiative award, Institute of Transportation Engineers Utah Chapter project of the year, 2014 Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Award of Excellence for innovation and efficiency. In addition, UDOT has shared the technology with other states, including Kansas, Minnesota, Nevada, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Arizona.

ePM Master PIN: 10948 Funding Code: ST_SIGNL_ M&O

Page 96

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Traffic Management FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $3 million 2017 proposed: $3 million 2018 proposed: $ 3 million 2019 proposed: $ 3 million

CONTACT

Blaine Leonard, P.E. 801 887-3723 bleonard@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Improved the UDOT Traffic website and smart phone app

The Traffic Management Program uses state and federal funding to improve UDOT’s ability to collect and disseminate traffic information focused on optimizing mobility.

The program provides for expansion of UDOT’s fiber optic communication network, software, and devices, like cameras, overhead signs and traffic sensors, that allow UDOT to: • Continually manage the traffic signal network to help traffic flow more smoothly • Provide road users with information about traffic incidents, weather, construction delay, and travel times • Monitor traffic and quickly respond to mitigate the effects of crashes and disruptions.

• Help maintenance crews anticipate weather and clear snow efficiently • Manage Express Lanes to keep all lanes operating at optimal levels • Support Utah Highway Patrol efforts to clear incidents quickly • Adjust freeway ramp meters to smooth out traffic flow

Connected numerous signals in Salt Lake, Davis, Weber and Duchesne counties to the central control system Developed tools to measure the freeway performance and identify causes of delay Extended fiber along Logan Main Street and added ten traffic cameras.

Upgraded fiber capacity along I-15 in northern Utah County Extended high-speed fiber to three UDOT maintenance sheds in Utah County to provide better system access Collaborated with a Utah company to extend fiber along US-6 from I-15 to I-70 and connect to UDOT devices.

Road Weather Information Stations (RWIS) around the state gather real-time weather data on wind, precipitation, temperature, and road temperature. Meteorologists then predict impacts on travel, provide information to help maintenance crews take precautions against road ice and plan plowing operations, and provide travel information to the public. In 2015, Traffic Management expanded the network of RWIS around the state.

ePM Master PIN: 5954 Fund Code: ST_ATMS

Page 97

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

ATMS Asset Management FUNDING

UDOT’s new complete lifecycle approach to ATMS asset management will increase system reliability and reduce overall maintenance costs through orderly disposition of devices at end-of-life.

Programmed funding 2017 proposed: $3.9 million 2018 proposed: $3.9 million 2019 proposed: $3.9 million

The Automated Traffic Management System (ATMS) unites traffic monitoring stations, road weather information stations, traffic cameras, and other system components, with a power and communications backbone that allows UDOT to manage traffic in real time. A high-functioning ATMS system is central to optimizing mobility, and elements of ATMS significantly reduce fatalities and injuries.

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

CONTACT

John Haigwood 801 887-3768 jhaigwood@utah.gov

This program is new for FY 2017. UDOT Engineers have studied the needs of the ATMS program to implement a data centric life cycle approach to asset management.

Variable Message Signs (VMS) communicate travel information in real-time.

communulative devices

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ATMS Growth

UDOT ATMS has experienced tremendous growth since the Traffic Operations Center opened in 1999. The system now includes over 2000 devices, not including supporting electronics. Without a plan to replace these devices, the system would become increasingly unreliable and costly to maintain.

At end-of-life, ATMS devices are typically unreliable or broken. Systematic device replacement is a holistic approach that conserves funding and supports the functionality of the entire transportation system.

Statewide research shows Utah drivers consider VMS information to be their top resource for information on expected expected travel times, upcoming construction, lane closures, crashes blocking their route or information ahead of a large weather event.

Program activities include: • Replacing unreliable or non-functioning ATMS devices past end of life • Replacing ATMS devices that will reach end-of-life in current and future fiscal years before normal traffic flow is interrupted • Upgrading supporting equipment and electronics such as communication hub switches, power transformers and the communications backbone • Replacing broken communication junction boxes

ePM Master PIN: 0000 Funding Code: FUNDING

Page 98

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Barrier Treatments FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $300 thousand Proposed: 2017: $300 thousand 2018: $300 thousand 2019: $300 thousand

CONTACT

Robert Miles robertmiles@utah.gov 801 965-4273

The state-funded Barrier Treatments program is used to identify and replace substandard barrier and barrier end treatments on state and federal highway systems.

The Program is a partnership between the UDOT Traffic and Safety Division, FHWA, UDOT region offices, and fulfills a memorandum of understanding between UDOT and FHWA. Replacing substandard barrier furthers UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ZERO Fatalities strategic goal.

UDOT Region offices identify, screen and prioritize potential project locations.

Projects are evaluated using a five-step process that includes planning, analyzing prioritizing, programming and implementing. Region offices oversee project delivery.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Hundreds of locations on interstate highways have been improved during the past 5 years.

In 2014, UDOT Region Three installed 2.25 miles of new guardrail along steep drop-offs in Indian Canyon on US-191 between Helper and Duchesne.

In 2015, UDOT Region Four installed structure protection on I-15 and I-70, barrier and guardrail on SR-14, and guardrail on US-163

Replacing sub-standard barrier and barrier end treatments improves highway safety.

This photo shows a new standard end-treatment that replaced outdated Texas turndown barrier.

ePM Master PIN: 6061 Fund Code: ST_BARRIER

Page 99

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Small Area Lighting FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The Small-Area Lighting Improvement Program allows UDOT to partner with municipal officials to promote community safety and visibility at a specific location or along a state highway corridor.

Programmed funding 2016: $300 thousand 2017 proposed: $300 thousand 2018 proposed: $300 thousand 2019 proposed: $300 thousand

Program goals include: • Decreasing crash potential and severity • Improving nighttime safety and visibility • Improving energy efficiency • Replacing outdated lighting infrastructure

CONTACT

UDOT and community representatives work together to formulate a plan to address a lighting need. The community or municipality is usually required to provide some funding and work.

W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Funding may be also be applied to a plan already in place or used to supplement a community-driven project. The cost to maintain and power the installation is turned over to the municipality at project completion.

SR-163 , Monument Valley lighting US-191 Moab Bridge apporoach lightning SR-58, Wendover Boulevard Lighting US-89, Springville Mainstreet lighting improvements

UDOT updated the lighting for truck parking at the Lunt Park Safety Rest Area on I-15 near Parowan, Utah. Safe, adequate truck parking areas are important to commerce since truck operators need to take regular rest breaks. This photo used courtesy AARoads.com (Andy Field, Alex Nitzman).

ePM Master PIN: 6129 Funding Code: ST_LIGHTING

Page 100

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 101

FY 2017 - Small-Area Lighting Projects Reg 1 2 3 4 4 4 B B B B B B B

County BOX ELDER TOOELE UTAH IRON EMERY EMERY STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE

Route 0082P 0036P 0077P 0130P 0019P 0019P

BMP EMP 0.85 0.85 40.9 40.9 7.4 7.4 1.35 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIN 14704 14706 14711 14700 14708 14710 14709 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717

Project Location SR-82; MP .85 - .85 SR-36; MP 40.90 - 40.90 SR-77; MP 7.40 - 7.40 SR-130; MP 1.35 - 1.70 SR-19; MP 1.50 - 1.80 SR-19; MP 1.20 - 1.50 Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project

PIN Description SR-82, Garland (Bear River HS Lighting) SR-36 @ RR Crossing southwest of Stockton SR-77, Springville Intersection Lighting SR-130, Cedar City Main St Lighting SR-19, Green River Lighting Phase 2 SR-19, Green River Lighting Phase 3 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY17 Intersection Safety Improvements FY18 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY18 Funds transfers for lighting on FY18 projects Intersection Safety Improvements FY19 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY19 Funds transfers for lighting on FY19 projects

PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed

Project Value Planned Year $ 30,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 50,000 2018 $ 75,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2018 $ 125,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 50,000 2018 $ 50,000 2018 $ 150,000 2019 $ 50,000 2019 $ 100,000 2019

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 103

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Sign Modification & Replacement FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

State funding allows UDOT Traffic and Safety to identify and replace freeway signs that have deteriorated or become outdated.

Programmed funding 2016: $400 thousand 2017 proposed: $400 thousand 2018 proposed: $400 thousand 2018 proposed: $400 thousand

CONTACT

Michael Donivan 801 965-4376 mdonivan@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT Traffic and Safety placed 41 new signs in 2014, including: 10 signs for state parks 6 memorial signs Freeway signs at I-15 exits 167, 174, 111, and 113 75 70 mph speed limit signs The Utah Sign Manual and the Utah Standard Highway Signs Supplement are located on the UDOT FTP site.

Freeway signs provide important directional guidance to drivers.

Signs that are outdated, worn, or damaged are less effective at providing information and may even cause confusion.

UDOT replaces groups of signs or individual signs when: • A message becomes outdated or incorrect • The daytime or nighttime visibility is lost • A project can be completed using overlay of existing signs, offering a high benefit at a reasonably low cost Each year, region traffic engineers provide a list of potential projects, and UDOT Traffic and Safety and UDOT Regions prioritize projects. Requests by communities affected by UDOT projects are considered. Signs that will be replaced by a project within three years are not considered.

ePM Master PIN: 6364 Funding Code: ST_SIGNING

Page 104

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 105

FY 2017 - State Signing Reg 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4

County BOX ELDER BOX ELDER BOX ELDER TOOELE TOOELE TOOELE IRON MILLARD SEVIER

Route 0084N 0084N 0015P 0080N 0080P 0080N 0015P 0015P 0070P

BMP 33.3 32.414 363.75 88.65 83.17 76.42 75 138.09 73.936

EMP 33.3 32.4 364 88.7 83.2 76.4 75 138 73.9

PIN 14686 14697 14703 14693 14699 14705 14694 14701 14707

Project Location I-84; MP 31.70 - 31.70 & I-84; MP 33.30 - 33.30 I-84; MP 32.41 - 32.41 I-15; MP 363.75 - 363.75 & I-15; MP 365.54 - 365.54 I-80; MP 88.65 - 88.65 & I-80; MP 87.40 - 87.40 I-80; MP 83.17 - 83.17 & I-80; MP 84.40 - 84.40 I-80; MP 76.42 - 76.42 I-15; MP 75.00 - 75.00 & I-15; MP 78.00 - 78.00 I-15; MP 138.09 - 138.09 I-70; MP 73.94 - 73.94

PIN Description I-84; Exit 32, Ranch Exit Interchange I-84; Exit 32 Direction/Gore Signs I-15; Exits 363 & 365 I-80; Exit 88 I-80; Exit 84 I-80; Exit 77 I-15; Exits 75 & 78 I-15; Exit 138 I-70; Exit 73

PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed

Project Value Planned Year $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019 $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019 $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 107

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Spot Safety Improvements FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The Spot Safety Improvement Program funds infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects that are expected to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

Programmed funding 2016: $2 million 2017 proposed: $2 million 2018 proposed: $2 million 2019 proposed: $2 million

CONTACT

W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov

Enhanced crosswalk, 300 W between South Temple and North Temple, Salt Lake City

SSIP Funding comes entirely from the State of Utah and helps UDOT achieve the ZERO Fatalities Strategic Goal. Projects are selected annually using a fivestep process that includes planning, analyzing, prioritizing, programming, and implementing. Funding for infrastructure projects may only be applied on the state highway system.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Every life lost due to traffic deaths continues to affect us all.

Educating drivers to avoid dangerous driving behaviors and implementing measures to improve safety can help bring us closer to our goal of Zero Fatalities.

While overall traffic fatalities are down since 2000, that number has increased in the last three years ePM Master PIN: 5775 Fund Code: ST_SPOT_SFTY

Page 108

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 109

OPERATIONS AND SAFETY - SSIP Reg 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 B B B B B B

County WEBER CACHE WEBER DAVIS VARIOUS SUMMIT SALT LAKE SALT LAKE VARIOUS UTAH VARIOUS MILLARD MILLARD IRON KANE PIUTE PIUTE VARIOUS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE

Route 0134P 0101P 0204P 0089P 0150P 0150P 0154P 0085P 0089P 0040N 0015N 0006P 0020P 0014P 0062P 0062P

BMP 10.85 2.9 4.6 387.6 1 16 10.35 13.6 0 347.7 6.1 134.5 105.3 3 30.08 5.4 5.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

EMP 10.85 3 4.6 387.6 54.74 25 10.35 13.85 0 347.8 12.85 139.5 107.5 7 31 5.6 5.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIN 14480 14481 14482 14483 13497 14484 14485 14486 14487 13061 14488 14489 14490 14491 14492 14493 14494 14495 14496 14498 14499 14500 14501 14502

Project Location SR-134; MP 10.85 - 10.85 SR-101; MP 2.90 - 3.00 SR-204; MP 4.60 - 4.60 US-89; MP 387.55 - 387.55 SR-150; MP 1.00 - 54.74 SR-150; MP 16.00 - 25.00 SR-154; MP 10.35 - 10.35 SR-85; MP 13.60 - 13.85 specific project locations TBD US-89; MP 347.75 - 347.83 US-189; MP 8.66 - 14.59 & US-40; MP 6.10 - 12.85 & US-40; MP 6.10 - 12.85 I-15; MP 134.50 - 139.50 & I-15; MP 134.50 - 139.50 US-6; MP 105.28 - 107.51 SR-20; MP 3.00 - 7.00 SR-14; MP 30.08 - 31.00 SR-62; MP 5.40 - 5.60 SR-62; MP 5.40 - 5.60 specific locations TBD statewide studies statewide effort statewide study statewide studies statewide studies statewide studies

PIN Description SR-134; MP 10.85, Guardrail & Crash Cushion SR-101; MP 2.9-3.0, Curb, Gutter, & Shoulder Imps SR-204; MP 4.6, Construct Right Turn Lane US-89; MP 387.55, Construct Right Turn Lane SR-150; MP 1-55, Replace Signs SR-150; MP 16-25, Repair Shoulder Drop-Offs SR-154; MP 10.35, Crash Cushion SR-85; MP 13.6-13.85, Install Guardrail Spot Safety Improvement Projects FY18 US-89 at Main St/200 E, American Fork US-189 & US-40 Grooved-In Pavement Lines I-15; MP 134.5-139.5, Drowsy Driving Signs US-6; MP 105.28-107.51, Shoulder Improvements SR-20; MP 3-7, Shoulder Improvements SR-14; MP 30.08-31.00, Cable Barrier SR-62; MP 5.4-5.6, Sign Upgrades SR-62; MP 5.4-5.6, Shoulder & Clear Zone Imps Spot Safety Improvement Projects FY18 Interstate Speed Studies FY17 Safety Campaigns, Education, & Enforcement FY17 SHRP2 State Match Pooled Fund Study State Match FY17 Interstate Speed Studies FY18 Pooled Fund Studies State Match FY18

PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Active Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Active Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed

Project Value Planned Year $ 61,000 2017 $ 150,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 150,000 2018 $ 17,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 60,000 2017 $ 250,000 2018 $ 2,945,291 2017 $ 250,000 2018 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 75,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 150,000 2018 $ 100,000 2018 $ 200,000 2017 $ 400,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 200,000 2018 $ 20,000 2018

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 111

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

New Traffic Signals FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The New Traffic Signal Program promotes UDOT’s Zero Fatalities Strategic Goal by funding projects that improve safety at intersections.

Programmed funding 2016: $9 million 2017 proposed: $9 million 2018 proposed: $9 million 2019 proposed: $9 million

CONTACT

Jesse Sweeten, P.E. 801 965-4924 jsweeten@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 12 new signals placed 31 signals updated 26 intersection upgrades, including left-turn upgrades, detection, etc.

Advance warning signals installed in 7 locations 12 crossing upgrades, including school zones, HAWK signals, flashing beacons, etc.

New signals improve safety and mobility at SR-273 and 300 West in Kaysville

UDOT’s Traffic and Safety Division identifies intersections that may benefit from improved signal operation and works with region traffic engineers to oversee projects through investigation, design and construction.

Traffic studies determine if the intersection meets the requirements to trigger a signal warranting process. Locations that meet criteria are evaluated, and traffic engineers determine the best options to meet safety and traffic needs.

A streamlined contracting process and use of stockpiled materials helps to expedite projects to address safety issues as quickly as possible.

The program objective is to reduce high severity crashes by: • Expediting signal installation • Providing safe pedestrian access • Installing left-turn phasing and dual left-turn lanes • Replacing outdated traffic signals • Planning projects and determining eligibility • Making emergency repairs

26 emergency signal repairs 7 lighting projects, including 4 small area lighting projects, and 3 upgrades

ePM Master PIN: 5952 Fund Code: ST_SIGNALS

Page 112

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 113

FY 2017 - New Traffic Signals Reg 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

County CACHE SALT LAKE TOOELE UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH

Route 0091P 0071P 0112P 0089P 0006P 0068P 0198P 0089P 0092P 0089P

BMP 23.76 2 5.874 347.75 159.83 28.3 3.69 334.3 4.44 345.05

EMP 23.8 2 5.87 348 160 28.3 3.69 334 4.44 345

PIN 14634 14570 14684 13061 13954 14243 14573 14575 14595 14683

Project Location US-91; MP 23.76 - 23.76 SR-71; MP 2.00 - 2.00 SR-112; MP 5.87 - 5.87 US-89; MP 347.75 - 347.83 US-6; MP 159.83 - 159.83 SR-68; MP 28.30 - 28.30 SR-198; MP 3.69 - 3.69 US-89; MP 334.30 - 334.30 SR-92; MP 4.44 - 4.44 US-89; MP 345.05 - 345.05

PIN Description US-91 & 1000 West (MP 23.76) SR-71 & Park Ave (MP 2.00) SR-112 & Industrial Loop Road (MP 5.87) US-89 at Main St/200 E, American Fork US-6 & Center Street (MP 159.83) SR-68 & Ring Road (2015 South) MP 28.30 SR-198 & 1400 South (MP 3.69) US-89 (300 S) & Freedom Blvd (200 W) MP 334.30 SR-92 & 6400 West (MP 4.44) US-89 (State St) & 200/220 South (MP 345.05)

PIN Status STIP STIP STIP Active Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping

Project Value Planned Year $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 30,000 2017 $ 2,945,291 2017 $ 30,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 15,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROGRAMS

Page 115

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Maintenance Spot Improvements FUNDING

The Maintenance Spot Improvement Program corrects localized problems that could become a safety concern, but currently do not meet the Safety Spot Improvement Program guidelines.

Programmed funding 2016: $500 thousand 2017 proposed: $500 thousand 2018 proposed: $500 thousand 2019 proposed: $500 thousand

The ongoing work done by UDOT Maintenance crews is critical to maintaining and improving safety and mobility. Funding provides ongoing support for completing important improvements that cannot be met by other funding sources.

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

CONTACT

Region Program Managers & Lloyd Neeley 801 965-4789 lneeley@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since 2007, Maintenance crews and contractors under UDOT supervision have completed over 100 projects to maintain safety on state routes.

Cleaning a culvert

A wide variety of projects are eligible for funding. Some examples include: • Adding a left turn, right turn or through lane • Barrier upgrades or repair • Slope repair • Culvert repair, replacement, and cleaning The program is funded annually as an appropriation by the Utah Transportation Commission from the Transportation Fund. The Central Maintenance Division has program oversight and the region offices have direct responsibility for plan development, and contract management, and to verify that the completed work meets the project objectives.

Each Region Engineering Team identifies candidate projects and develops a priority ranking based on available funding, field review and District Engineer recommendations.

ePM Master PIN: 5930 Funding Code: ST_ SPOT_MNT

Page 116

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Transportation Alternatives Program

Z/ ,&/ > /dz K>> ' s Eh ZK yd E^/KE E /< W d,

d

Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ç Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161; Ć?Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ŽĨ ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜÄ&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĸÄ? Ä?Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x161; Ä?ĆľĆ&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ć? Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ ^ĹśĹ˝Ç Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ^Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152; .(< (1*,1((5,1* (/(0(176 sÄ&#x201A;ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ç&#x2021; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?ĹľĆ&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A; Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹ t )81',1* $&48,6,7,21 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ç Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ĺś Ć&#x161;Ç Ĺ˝ Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;ͲÄ&#x17E;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ć?Í&#x2022; ϹϏϏ EĹ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ^ĹśĹ˝Ç Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; t '(6,*1 (1*,1((5,1* ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä?Ä&#x17E;ĹśÄ&#x17E;ÄŽĆ&#x161;Ć? ŽĨ Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜÄ&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśĆ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ t &216758&7,21 (1*,1((5,1* Ä?Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ć&#x2030;ĆľÄ?ĹŻĹ?Ä? ĨÄ&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?ĹŻĹ?Ć&#x;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?ŽƾĆ?ĹŻÇ&#x2021; ŽŜůÇ&#x2021; Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; ŽŜÄ&#x17E; Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; $&(& +2125 $:$5' ŽƾĆ&#x161;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?Ä&#x17E;ĆŠÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152; Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ĹśÄ?Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć?Í&#x2DC; &/,(17 %(1(),76 dĹ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśĆ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ĹŻĹ?Ŝŏ Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ć?Ć&#x;Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; t $'',7,21$/ Ä?ŽžžƾŜĹ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x2020;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; ĨŽĆ&#x152; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; 75$163257$7,21 &$3$&,7< Ä?ŽŜĆ&#x;ŜƾÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ŽĨ Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś t $&&(66 72 38%/,& )$&,/,7,(6 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ć&#x152;ŽƾĹ?Ĺ&#x161;ŽƾĆ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ç t %,.( 3('(675,$1 3$7+ Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A; Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ä?ŽŜÄ&#x161; t *5($7(5 (0(5*(1&< Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĎąÍ&#x2022;ϭϏϏͲĆ?Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? $&&(66 Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Í&#x2022; Ç Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161; Ç Ĺ?ĹŻĹŻ Ĺ?ĹśÄ?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E; Ć?Ä&#x201A;ĨÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; t $&&(66 72 6(9,(5 9$//(< Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x2020;Ĺ?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x;ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2DC; &(17(5 Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?ŽŽĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x17E;ÄŤĹ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161; ŽĨ Ĺ?ŜĨĆ&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ˝Ç ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ć? Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ć?ƾůĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?ŽžžŽÄ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ŽĨ Ä&#x201A; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹŠĹ˝Ć&#x152; Ä?Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;ĹŻÍ&#x2022; Ĺ?ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ĺ?Ĺ&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2022; ds Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; &267 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;ĹŹĹ?ĹśĹ?Í&#x2022; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹŠĹ˝Ć&#x152; Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; Ä?Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ć?Ć?Ĺ?ĹśĹ?Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Í&#x2022; ĆľĆ&#x;ĹŻĹ?Ć&#x;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä&#x201A; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹŻĹŻ Ç Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Í&#x2DC; ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ć? Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; Ć&#x2030;ĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ç Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?ĹľĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Í&#x2DC; &203/(7(' t :ŽŜÄ&#x17E;Ć? Î&#x2DC; Ä&#x17E;DĹ?ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E; ĹśĹ?Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä?ŽžĆ&#x2030;ĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä¨Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻĹ˝Ç Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ć?Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E; ŽĨ Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć? ĨŽĆ&#x152; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Í&#x2014; Íť WĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E;ĹŻĹ?ĹľĹ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; Ć?Ć&#x161;ĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ĨƾŜÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Íť ĹśÇ&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ć&#x152;ŽŜžÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć?Ć&#x161;ĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ĺ?Ĺ&#x161;Ć&#x161;ͲŽĨͲ )81',1* Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ t &,% Íť ZĹ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ĺ?Ĺ?ĹśÍ&#x2022; Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ŽžÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä?Ć?Í&#x2022; Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ĺ˝Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ĹśĹ?Ä?Ä&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ĺ&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ƾůĹ?Ä?Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;ĹŻÇ&#x2021;Ć?Ĺ?Ć? &/,(17 &217$&7 Íť Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?ŽŜĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x161; t 0,.( /$1*6721 Íť ŽŜĆ?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ĺ˝Ä?Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; &,7< 0$1$*(5 Íť ŽŜĆ?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ć?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹŹĹ?ĹśĹ?

5,&+),(/' &,7< Íť DÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;ĹŻĆ? Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĹ?

Íť ŽŜĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ä?ĹŻĹ˝Ć?Ä&#x17E;ŽƾĆ&#x161;

FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

Programmed funding 2015: $6.4 million 2016: $6.5 million 2017: $6.5 million 2018 proposed: $6.5 million

CONTACT

Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Snow College Richfield Bike Path (Richfield City Project Sponsor)

The Transportation Alternatives Program supports projects that enhance safety and expand options for non-drivers, mitigate environmental impacts and convert former interstate facilities to new uses.

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) changed the way funds are distributed and programmed. Funds are split in half between Utah Metropolitan Planning Agencies and UDOT. To qualify for funding all projects must fit into one of nine federally designated categories. Examples include:

â&#x20AC;˘ Construction, planning and design of facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act

â&#x20AC;˘ Safe routes for non drivers to access daily needs.

â&#x20AC;˘ Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails.

â&#x20AC;˘ Any Environmental mitigation activity

â&#x20AC;˘ Reduced vehicle-caused wildlife mortality â&#x20AC;˘ Safe Routes to School projects FOR MORE INFORMATION: visit the UDOT TAP web page.

Price City, Main Street, 100 East to 200 East (JHC SU) Lehi Historic Utah Southern Rail Trail â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Phase II (MAG -2014/2015) 700 West; 7200 South 5 Ĺ&#x20AC; 3 Ĺ&#x20AC; 0 Ĺ&#x20AC; 5 to 7800 South, Trails and Bike paths, Midvale City (WFRC) ,&+),(/'

5,&(

$17,

226(9(/7

Welby Jacob and Bngham Creek; North City Limit to South City Limit, South Jordan (WFRC)

Transportation alternatives expand options for non-drivers by funding a broad range of projects, including on and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Snow College Richfield Bike Path, sponsored by Richfield City, built a collector road and bike and pedestrian path between two dead-end roads, 500 North and Snow College Richfield.

Read more about the project on the Jones and DeMille website.

Center Street Trail; Redwood

Road to Legacy Parkway (WFRC)

Fund Code: TAP

Page 117

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Freight Program FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016 proposed: $10.6 million 2017 proposed: $10.4 million 2018 proposed: $11.3 million 2019 proposed: $12.7 million

The Freight Program, part of the UDOT Planning Division, supports the efficient movement of goods along major freight corridors by partnering with the freight community and conducting transportation studies and public outreach. Find Utah’s Freight Plan online: http://www.udot.utah. gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=23980801691013244

CONTACT

Daniel B. Kuhn Railroad & Freight Planner 801 965-4148 dkuhn@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Utah Freight Plan, 2015 Utah State Rail Plan, 2015 I-15 Truck Parking Study, 2010-2016

C.R. England Inc. Tempstack temperature-controlled intermodal container.

Headquartered in Salt Lake City, C.R. England is the world’s largest temperaturecontrolled trucking and intermodal corporation. Photo courtesy of C.R. England Inc.

Detailed and concise freight planning supports the local economy by minimizing the cost of moving goods – a cost that can be reflected in the price consumers pay for food, clothing, fuel, and other necessities. Freight planning also allows UDOT to focus limited resources on projects that support economic activity.

Current efforts include: Completion and acceptance of Utah’s first freight plan — Planning staff worked with Utah’s Freight Mobility Group and other stakeholders to complete the Utah Freight Plan. This 20-year plan is a resource of information that feeds directly into UDOT’s Long Range Transportation Plan, and Utah’s Unified Plan.

Completion and acceptance of the Utah State Rail Plan – The first comprehensive assessment of Utah’s rail operations and needs since 1996.

Focused on freight, this plan enables UDOT to implement an integrated approach that will incorporate freight and passenger rail elements into the larger multi-modal and intermodal framework, and feeds into the Utah Freight Plan.

Conduct ongoing public outreach — Planning staff maintain a partnership with the Utah Trucking Association and freight stakeholders by updating industry partners and encouraging feedback.

Freight economics planning — Planning staff develop and evaluate performance measures and report results in the annual UDOT Strategic Direction. A formal stakeholder outreach and communication plan keeps UDOT Planning in sync with industry and state economic development partners. In 2016, UDOT staff are working on a draft Freight Mobility and Trade Plan.

Page 118

UTAH FREIGHT PROGRAM County

Region

Entity

Route

Project Description

Length (miles)

Improvement

Add WB passing lane from MP 31.2 to MP 32.7, Daniels Canyon North of Summit

1.5

Passing Lane

0.8

3.1

Wasatch

3

UDOT

U.S. 40

Emery

4

UDOT

U.S. 6

Emery

4

UDOT

U.S. 6

Extend WB passing lane from MP 261.2 to MP 262.0 Add WB passing lane from MP 266.8 and 269.9

Score

Scoring Category

FY

$5,000,000

50-59

Passing

2016

Passing Lane

$1,800,000.00

40-49

Passing

2016

Passing Lane

$7,300,000.00

30-39

Passing

2016

Score

Scoring Category

FY

Estimated Cost

$14,100,000 County

Region

Entity

Route

Project Description

Widen to 4 lanes from Moab to U.S. 191 Colorado River Bridge (MP 126.3 to MP 128.0)

Length (miles)

Improvement

2.1

Widening

$13,500,000

10-19

Widening

2017-2018

Estimated Cost

Grand

4

UDOT

Emery

4

UDOT

U.S. 6

Add EB and WB from MP 291.7 and 293.7

2

Passing Lane

$9,000,000

40-49

Passing

2017-2018

Salt Lake

2

WFRC

I-80

Widen EB to 4 lanes from I-215 (east) to Lambs Canyon Road

8

Widening

$37,000,000

50-59

Widening

2017-2018

Tooele

2

UDOT

2.8

New Construction

$100,000,000

11

New Construction

2017-2018

Statewide

Various

Statewide

Various

SR-201; Extension to SR-36 Truck Parking/Intelligent Various Parking: Interstates and NHS routes,â&#x20AC;Ś SR-201

Motor Carrier: Facility and Various Technology Imp; US-6 Price Canyon POE, chain-up areas

Various

4

UDOT

I-70

Weber

1

WFRC

I-15

Washington

4

DMPO

I-15

Juab

3

UDOT

Iron

4

UDOT

Wasatch

3

UDOT

I-15

ATMS fiber and ITS devices on I-70 from I15 to SR-6 Interchange upgrade at 24th [Street/Midland Drive (SR-126 to I15)] Initial SR-9 Interchange Modifications Add NB passing lane from MP 230.0 to MP 233.0, Between Nephi and Mona

Add WB passing lane from MP 7.5 to MP 10.0 US-189; Wallsburg to U.S. 189 Charleston S.R. 20

n/a

2017-2018

n/a

2017-2018

130

Operational

$30,000,000

n/a

n/a

2017-2018

1.5

Interchange Upgrade New Widen

$80,000,000

40-49

Upgrade Interchange

2017-2018

0.5

Upgrade Interchange

$37,000,000

60-69

Upgrade Interchange

2017-2018

3

Passing Lane

$10,050,000

60-69

Passing

2017-2018

2.5

Passing Lane

$5,875,000

30-39

Passing

2017-2018

6.9

Widening

$46/$73 Million

60-69

Passing

2017-2018

WEBER B O X

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

RICH

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

S A LT L A K E

Grantsville

191 44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

144

§ ¦ ¨ 15

92 Lehi

92

146

73

Heber City

Vernal

35

WASATCH

Naples

121 Tabiona

U T A H

13389

189

208 Myton Duchesne

Springville

77

40 !

141

88 45

68

U I N T A H

198 6 !

Eureka

40

40

89

6

6

36

40 !

87 Roosevelt

Provo

Vernon

149

191 89 Mona

Nephi

J U A B

6

SANPETE

132

132

C A R B O N Helper

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

E M E R Y

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Delta

Scofield

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

M I L L A R D

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Manti Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016

Freight

T O O E L E

113

Eureka

U T A H

Mona

132

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

116

Helper

264

Fairview

Hiawatha

Manti

50

159

28

M I L L A R D

Castle Dale

70

Green River

E M E R Y

G R A N D

19

§ ¦ ¨

Crescent Jct.

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

Richfield

128

119 118

161

24

Monroe

70

Milford

24 Moab

72

§ ¦ ¨

B E A V E R

§ ¦ ¨

Marysvale

PIUTE

Freight

Kanosh

6 !

14723

Emery

SE VI ER

15

21

10

260

118

14722

Ferron

Salina

99

257

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

Cleveland

Sterling

137

50 100

124 155

Clawson

Holden

§ ¦ ¨

122

57

29

Gunnison

50

123

Huntington

89

Sunnyside

Wellington

31

Ephraim

Hinckley

Region 4

U I N T A H

157 Price

117

136

CARBON

Scofield

132

125 Delta

191

96

Levan

174

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

89

Nephi

J U A B

6

313

25

279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell

Beaver Minersville

62

153

24

22

89

Antimony

130

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

W A Y N E

46

21

20

56

Torrey

Junction

Parowan

95 211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

S A N

Hurricane

276

9

9

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

J U A N 95

Glendale

7

Blanding

Tropic

89 17

191

95

14

WA S HI N G TO N

St. George

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2016

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Railway-Highway Grade Crossing FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The Railway-Highway Grade Crossing Program, funded by the Federal Highway Administration, supports data collection efforts and projects that mitigate at-grade crossing crash risk.

Programmed funding 2016: $1.6 million 2017 proposed: $1.6 million 2018 proposed: $1.6 million 2019 proposed: $1.7 million

CONTACT

Eric Cheng 801 965-4284 echeng@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Completed Projects: Spanish Fork Railroad Consolidation Study Public Grade Crossing signage upgrades in UDOT Region One Ongoing Projects: Statewide Railroad Signal Preemption Manual 5900 South; State Street to 700 West, westbound exit gate at TRAX crossing Commuter Rail North Pedestrian Treatments Program Public grade crossing signage upgrades in UDOT Regions Two, Three and Four Warning devices on Faust Road in Tooele County

A railroad advance warning signal

UDOT oversees all public highway-rail at-grade crossings in Utah. Railroads have responsibility for safety at all private at-grade crossings.

The goal of the program is to improve the safety of all crossing users, and to support the efficient use of crossings by trains, vehicles and pedestrians by: • Eliminating public at-grade crossings, where possible • Performing yearly inspections to update the safety features inventory and working with municipalities to assure that deficiencies are corrected • Funding projects that mitigate crash risk The program has many important ongoing efforts, including: • Development of guidelines to standardize preemption of traffic signals near at-grade crossings, and project identification • Partnering with UTA to install pedestrian safety devices at grade crossings along the TRAX Blue Line and the commuter lines in compliance with UDOT Standards.

• Upgrading advance warning sighs with deficient retroreflectivity and adjusting distance from crossing to meet current standards.

US-6 Railroad advance warning signals and crossing upgrades in Lynndyl Statewide pedestrian crossing improvements

ePM Master PIN: 6064 Fund Code: R/H_XXXX_XXX

Page 122

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 123

FY 2017~2020 RAIL PROJECTS

Reg 1

County VARIOUS

Route

1 1 1 2 2 2

CACHE VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS SALT LAKE SALT LAKE

1204P

2

BMP

EMP

PIN

0

0

2364P

0.504 0 0 0 0 0.591

0.504 0 0 0 0 0.611

SALT LAKE

2135P

1.394

1.394

2 2

SALT LAKE VARIOUS

0209P

6.933 0

6.933 0

3 3 3 3 4 4 4 B B B B B B

VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS UTAH CARBON VARIOUS VARIOUS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE

0132P

32.919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32.919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Project Location 13534 Specific locations TBD SR-30; MP 109.16 - 109.16 & Cnty:FA-1193; MP .15 - .15 & Cnty:FA-1210; MP .06 - .06 & Cnty:FA-1200; MP 1.56 - 1.56 & Cnty:FA14566 1204; MP .50 - .50 13542 Regionwide study 13544 Locations in R1 TBD 13535 Specific locations TBD 13545 TRAX line crossing 14569 Cnty:FA-2364; MP .59 - .61 & 300 North RR xing Cnty:FA-2135; MP 1.39 - 1.39 & Cnty:FA-2258; MP 2.22 - 2.22 & Cnty:FA-2305; MP .41 - .41 & crossings at 520 S 500 W; 900 S 14572 @~600 W; 1800 S 900 W; 1450 S Pioneer Rd; and 200 W Paxton Ave SR-209; MP 6.93 - 6.93 & SR-172; MP 2.05 - 2.05 & Cnty:FA-2161; MP 2.98 - 2.98 & crossings at ~4200 W 9000 S, 4550 W New 14579 Bingham Hwy, and 4690 S 5600 W 13540 Locations in R2 TBD 13533 13536 13546 14580 13529 13541 13537 13538 13539 14718 14719 14720 14721

SR-132; MP 32.92 - 32.92 & SR-74; MP .15 - .15 & SR-114; MP 9.03 - 9.03 & SR-114; MP 9.32 - 9.32 & SR-147; MP 13.26 - 13.26 Specific locations TBD Locations in R3 TBD Cnty:FA-2845; MP 1.24 - 1.24 & realignment of Tintic Line and elimination of 6 crossings Cnty:FA-1335; MP .42 - .42 & 3 separate crossings Locations in R4 TBD Various Locations in Region 4 Non-construction project Non-construction project Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support

PIN Description Region 1 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades

PIN Status Proposed

Project Value Planned Year $ 107,000 2017

Logan Ped Xing Improvements Region 1 RR Corridor Studies Region 1 RR Grade Xing Upgrades Region 2 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades West Jordan Ped Xing Upgrades West High School Ped Overpass

Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed

$ $ $ $ $ $

879,949 50,000 680,000 832,000 60,000 500,000

2017 2018 2019 2017 2017 2018

Salt Lake City Ped Xing Improvements

Proposed

$

505,000

2018

Region 2 Ped Xing Improvements Region 2 Grade Xing Upgrades

Proposed Proposed

$ $

40,000 140,384

2018 2019

Region 3 Ped Xing Improvements Region 3 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades Region 3 RR Grade Xing Upgrades Tintic Line Realignment (will be added to R3 PIN) Price Ped Xing Improvements Region 4 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades Region 4 RR Grade Xing Upgrades RR Xing Program Management FY17 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY17 RR Xing Program Management FY18 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY18 RR Xing Program Management FY19 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY19

Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

100,000 512,000 466,000 866,000 145,000 150,000 192,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 90,000 120,000

2017 2017 2018 2019 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 125

42

30

Snowville

200

61 Trenton

142

142 91

23

§ ¦ ¨

218

15

89

81

30

83

38

30

14566

C A C H E

23

102

30

Logan

Randolph

240

B O X

R I C H

101

165

13

16

89 !

E L D E R

Brigham City

Woodruff

39 16

89

39 158

13534

§ ¦ ¨ 15

13542

W E B E R Huntsville

13544 Ogden

167

M O R G A N Morgan

D A V I S

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Farmington

S U M M I T

66

Coalville

T O O E L E Wendover

Bountiful

67

S A L T

65

L A K E Salt Lake City

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Railway-Highway Grade Crossing

§ ¦ ¨ 84

Region 1

Garden City

C A C H E R I C H

WEBER B O X

E L D E R

Ogden

Region 2

Huntsville

§ ¦ ¨

Morgan

D A V I S

80

Farmington

§ ¦ ¨ 84

65

Coalville Bountiful

S U M M I T 14572

Wendover

§ ¦ ¨ 80

13535

14569 Salt Lake City

201

14572 14579 13545

138 Grantsville

36 112

T O O E L E

Tooele

14579

65 150

14572

13540

224

32

40 Park City

Kamas

248

SALT LAKE

150 35

Draper Heber City

196 36

W A S A T C H

Lehi

Tabiona

199

D U C H E S N E

73

Roosevelt

Provo

36

Myton Duchesne

Springville

U T A H

Vernon

Eureka

J U A B

Mona

C A R B O N

Scofield

Nephi

Helper

EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Railway-Highway Grade Crossing

M O R G A N

WEBER B O X

RICH

Huntsville

MORGAN

Ogden

E L D E R

Region 3

Morgan

D A V I S

Farmington

43

DAGGETT

Manila

Bountiful

S U M M I T

Salt Lake City

Wendover

S A LT L A K E

Grantsville

191 44

DUCHESNE

Park City

191

Kamas

40 !

32

Tooele

222

Draper

144

T O O E L E

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Vernal

35

WASATCH

Naples

92 13533 146 13533 189

Lehi

73

UTAH

113

Heber City

121 Tabiona

13536

68 141

208 Myton Duchesne

40 !

198

88 45

U I N T A H

13533 6 !

Eureka

40

40 Provo

13546

77 Springville 14580

6

6

36

40 !

87 Roosevelt

89 Vernon

149

191 89 Mona

J U A B

13533 6

Nephi

SANPETE

132

132

C A R B O N Helper

Fairview Levan

78

Moroni

Price

Mount Pleasant

Wellington

Sunnyside

Hiawatha

28

EMERY

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Delta

Scofield

Ephraim

Hinckley

Huntington

M I L L A R D

Manti

Clawson Mayfield

Holden

G R A N D

Castle Dale

Sterling Gunnison

Cleveland

Ferron

SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

Railway-Highway Grade Crossing

Coalville

T O O E L E

Eureka

U T A H

Mona

174

Fairview

Moroni

Mount Pleasant

Price

31 Hiawatha

117

Huntington

Hinckley Manti

50

28

89

57

29

159

Sterling

260

99

13537

118

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Kanosh

13541

Monroe

70

Salina

Emery

§ ¦ ¨

Green River

E M E R Y

19 Crescent Jct.

§ ¦ ¨

70

70

163 !

24

§ ¦ ¨ Marysvale

128

24 Moab

72

70

Milford

§ ¦ ¨

119

118

B E A V E R

6 !

Ferron

10

SE VI E R

Richfield

161

Mayfield

256

Fillmore

257

21

137

50 100

Cleveland

Clawson

Holden

M I L L A R D

GRAND

124 155

Castle Dale

Gunnison

50

Sunnyside

123

122

Ephraim

136

13529 Wellington

PIUTE

Region 4

U I N T A H

157

Railway-Highway Grade Crossing

Delta

116

Helper

264

132

125

CARBON

Scofield

Levan

132

191

96

89

Nephi

J U A B

WASATCH D U C H E S N E

6

313

25

279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell

Beaver Minersville

62

153

24

22

89

Antimony

130

G A R F I E L D Boulder

I R O N

W A Y N E

46

21

20

56

Torrey

Junction

Parowan

95 211

Monticello

276

491

Panguitch Escalante

Cedar City

143

63

Enterprise

219

§ ¦ ¨ 15

18

S A N

Hurricane

276

9

9

262

261

K A N E

162

89 59

J U A N 95

Glendale

7

Blanding

Tropic

89 17

191

95

14

WA S H I N G TO N

St. George

12

12

162

316 191

Kanab

163

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3

Region 4

I

Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016

0

200 Miles

Project Year 2017 2018 2019

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Non-Urban Program FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $4.4 million 2017 Proposed: $5.2 million 2018 Proposed: $5.5 million 2019 Proposed: $5.7 million

CONTACT

The Joint Highway Committee Non-Urban Program provides federal funding for roadway safety and condition improvements in communities having a population of 5000 or less.

The Joint Highway Committee oversees applications on an annual basis; however local agencies may only have one project in the program at one time, and projects must be completed before agencies submit another application.

Preference is given to projects that provide safety features and upgrade and improve existing roadway conditions.

Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS SR-87; Climbing Lane North of Duchesne, UDOT Region Three Project Sponsor 700 East; 300 North to 650 North, Morgan City Project Sponsor Turn Lanes Project; SR-89 & 300 West, Garden City, UDOT Region Three Project Sponsor SR-87 climbing lanes north of Duchesne

Recent federal changes reduced the amount of funding to the program by 35 percent. UDOT provided funding to keep the program whole and conform to the STIP through 2014.

Projects must be located within non-urban areas and functionally classified as a major collector or higher. The value of the project must be between $4 hundred-thousand and $2 million. Funding for the NU program for FY 2015 is expected to decrease to approximately $3.9 in FY 2015.

FUND CODE: STP_RURAL

Page 130

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 131

Joint Highway Comission: Non Urban Program Reg 1 2 3 3 3 4

County RICH SUMMIT JUAB DAGGETT UINTAH SAN JUAN

Route 0089P 2608P 1826P 1364P 2776P 2416P

4

VARIOUS

0118P

BMP

EMP

498 7.8 12.031 16.869 9 31.502

498.3 9.06 13.716 23.823 12.5 35.578

6.824

10.042

Project Location PIN Description US-89; MP 498.00 - 498.30 & 300 West: SR-89 to Buttercup Blvd, Gar 300 West: SR-89 to Buttercup Blvd, Garden City Cnty:FA-2608; MP 7.80 - 9.06 & Cnty:FA-2608; MP 6.40 - 7.40 & Nort North & South Main St. Overlay Phase 2, Coalville Old Hwy 91: 7800 No to Utah County Line Old Hwy 91 Phase IV Cnty:FA-1364; MP 16.87 - 23.82 Browns Park Road Phase 3 Cnty:FA-2776; MP 9.00 - 12.50 & Red Wash Road, Phase 2 (3.0 Miles) Red Wash Road, Phase 2 (3.0 Miles) Hatch Trading Post Road Hatch Trading Post Road SR-119; MP .00 - 4.55 & SR-118; MP 6.82 - 10.04 & US-6; MP 89.40 Region 4 Chip Seals Various Locations 8624 107.05

PIN 10882 12944 10881 10880 12945 10879

Project Value Planned Year $ 1,072,616 $ 2,145,232 $ 2,145,000 $ 2,145,232 $ 1,870,000 $ 2,145,000

2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 2017

$

2018

2,145,232

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 133

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Small Urban Program FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $6.2 million 2017 Proposed: $3.3 million 2018 Proposed: $3.5 million 2019 Proposed: $3.6 million

CONTACT

The Joint Highway Committee Small Urban Program provides federal funding for roadway safety and condition improvements for communities having a population between 5 thousand and 2 hundredthousand.

The Joint Highway Committee oversees applications to the program on an annual basis; however local agencies may only have one project in the program at one time. Preference is given to projects that provide safety features and upgrade and improve existing roadway conditions.

Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov

Recent federal changes reduced the amount of funding to the program by 12 percent. UDOT is providing funding to keep the program whole and conform to the STIP through 2014.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

To be eligible, projects must be located within small urban areas and functionally classified as a major collector or higher. The maximum amount of federal aid available for a project is $1 million.

Recent projects: 1000 North, 2300 East to I-15, Tremonton Project Sponsor Heber Daniel Road, Heber City Project Sponsor 500 West, Phase 3; Mill Creek Bridge to Kane Creek Moab City Project Sponsor

Deer Valley Drive -- Park City is adding utility, storm drain and safety improvements. Traffic flow will be improved by constructing bus pullouts. The roadway will be resurfaced from the roundabout to Deer Valley North.

Fund Code: STP_SU_JHC

Page 134

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 135

Joint Highway Comission: Small Urban Program Reg 2 2 2

County SUMMIT TOOELE SUMMIT

Route 2602P 0138P 2602P

3 3 3 4 4 4 4

UINTAH DUCHESNE DUCHESNE CARBON GRAND CARBON SEVIER

0040P 1546P 1546P 1327P 1693P 1327P 2552P

BMP EMP 4.558 18.129 2.575 145.866 5.629 6.071 0.385 0 0.63 0

PIN 5 11854 18 11856 3 13882 148 6 6 0.727 0 1 0

11855 12938 13884 10859 11852 12939 13880

Project Location PIN Description Project Value Planned Year 2017 Cnty:FA-2602; MP 4.56 - 4.58 Summit County, Kilby Road Landmark Drive $ 1,500,000 2018 SR-138; MP 18.13 - 18.25 SR-138 & Village Road Improvements, Tooele Count $ 1,420,000 2019 Cnty:FA-2602; MP 2.58 - 2.75 & Cnty:FA-2598; MP .00 - .08 & Cnty:FAJeremy Ranch Frontage Rd Intersection Improveme $ 1,971,000 US-40; MP 145.87 - 148.23 US-40, Safety Street Lighting, 500 S to 2850 S State Street; 800 South to 1800 South in Roosevelt State Street; 800 South to 1800 South, Roosevelt Cnty:FA-1546; MP 6.07 - 6.26 & State Street Phase II Pedestrian & Ve State Street Phase II Pedestrian & Vehicle Safety 1900 East Price Phase II: 300 N to 600 North 1900 East Price: 300 N to 600 N Millcreek Drive Intersection Improvements Moab City, Millcreek Drive Intersection Improveme Cnty:FA-1327; MP .63 - 1.00 & 1900 East, 600 North to 800 North in P1900 East Phase III, 600 North to 800 North Cnty:FA-2552; MP .00 - .28 & 100 East Phase III, 300 South to Main St100 East Phase III, 300 South to Main Street

$ $ $ $ $ $

836,950 1,197,000 998,000 888000 1,200,000 919,000 1,290,000

2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2019 2019

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 137

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Off-System Bridge Program FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $4.6 million 2017 Proposed: $1.8 million 2018 Proposed: $1.8 million 2019 Proposed: $1.8 million

The Joint Highway Commission Off-System Bridge Program helps aid in removing deficient structures from the National Bridge Inventory while allowing local agencies to receive a soft match credit toward a future Highway Bridge Program eligible project.

CONTACT

The Joint Highway Commission oversees the program and accepts project applications on an annual basis. The program improves public safety and reduces ongoing maintenance costs often associated with aging infrastructure.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The structure must be located on a rural minor collector or urban or rural local road. The Sufficiency Rating of the structure must be less than 80 for rehabilitation and less than 50 for replacement. For more information visit the Off-System Bridge Program page on the UDOT Website.

Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov

1000 North, 2300 East to I-15, Tremonton Project Sponsor Heber Daniel Road Bridge, Heber City Project Sponsor 500 West, Phase 3; Mill Creek Bridge to Kane Creek, Moab City Project Sponsor

The Icy Springs Bridge has a wider cross-section and increased span to improve safety and reduce flooding.

The Malad River Bridge has an increased clear span and higher elevation to reduce flooding.

Fund Code: STP_BR

Page 138

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 139

Reg 4

County WASHINGTON

Route 3226P

Joint Highway Comission: Off-System Bridge Program

Project Location BMP EMP PIN 9.161 11859 Rockville City, Structure Replacement 053019C 9.092

PIN Description Rockville City, Structure Replacement 053019C

Project Value Planned Year $ 3,200,000 2017

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 141

Federal Lands Access Program FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $10.5 million 2017 proposed: $10.5 million 2018 proposed: $10.5 million 2019 proposed: $10.5 million 2020 proposed: $10.5 million 2021 proposed: $10.5 million 2022 proposed: $10.5 million

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

The Federal Lands Access Program, established by Federal Map 21 legislation, provides funding for transportation project that are in, provide access to, or are adjacent to Federal Lands.

The program is intended to support economic activity generated by tourism and recreation sites. The program is funded through Highway Account of the Highway Trust fund.

Programming decisions are made locally by a Program Decisions Committee.

Funds are distributed to states according to a formula based on the number of visitors, federal land area, federal public road mileage, and the number of federal public bridges. A non-federal funding match is required.

Program funds can be applied to design, construction, and reconstruction, but not maintenance projects. State, tribal, or local government agencies that own or maintain transportation facilities are eligible to apply.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Six projects have been selected, planned, and programmed through 2017.

Sponsors include Bryce Canyon City, Wasatch County, Kane County, UDOT, Sevier County and Juab County.

For more information, see the Utah Access Program page on the FWHA website.

The SR-149, Jensen to Dinosaur National Monument Project is funded at $11.4 million.

UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s participation rate is 6.77 percent. The project will widen SR-149 from milepost 0 to MP 4.22 to include 12 foot travel lanes and 4 foot shoulders, and will replace a bridge at milepost 2.7. FHWA Central Federal Lands Division is performing all design efforts, and UDOT will provide design review, construction input, and final acceptance. The project will be constructed in 2015.

Fund Code: TBD

Utah Federal Lands Access Program Proposed/Draft Project Selection Project Name

Description of Work

Applicant

FLMAs Accessed

County

Year

Sevenmile-Gooseberry

Placing pavement on the remaining 5.1 miles of this 28 mile route in Phase 2

Sevier County

Fishlake NF

Sevier

2013

Little Sahara Sand Dunes and Highway 148

Pulverization and paving of 13.7 miles of Highway 148 and the Sand Dunes Road to provide a safe, smooth public access to the Little Sahara Recreation Area and Cherry Creek

Juab County

$2,791,000

Little Sahara Recreation Area

La Sal Mountain Loop Road

Cascade Springs Road Dinosaur National Monument Access Road SR-149, Shoulder Widening & Bike Lanes

Improve 8.7 miles of roadway including asphalt pulverizing and replacement, full depth reclamation of existing asphalt and road base, importing road base where necessary, roadway widening and drainage improvements Replace the old culverts, add guardrail, and place new hot mix asphalt surface on the roadway The project will widen the road to include bike lanes on the shoulders

Juab

2014 $6,683,000

This project will provide planning, engineering, construction documents and construction of a Bryce Canyon Bicycle/Pedestrian Bryce Canyon City Bryce Canyon NP, Dixie NF separated bicycle/pedestrian Pathway pathway from the existing Transportation Hub in Bryce Canyon City to Bryce Canyon National Park Reconstruction of a 2-lane highway Navajo Lake Road Reconstruction in compliance with AASHTO standards

Cost Estimate

Kane County

Dixie NF

Garfield

2015

$841,000 Kane

2015 $6,959,000

Grand County

Manti-LaSal NF

Grand

2016

$11,657,000 Wasatch County

Uintah NF

Wasatch

2017 $6,514,000

UDOT

Dinosaur NM

Uintah

2018 $7,964,000 $43,409,000

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 143

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

State Planning FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

State Planning Program provides data and other information about the transportation system to help plan transportation improvements and expand active transportation options.

Programmed funding 2016: $5.4 million 2017 proposed: $5.5 million

CONTACT

Jeff Harris 801-965-4354 jeffharris@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Long range planning lead to a completed plan document for the years 2015-2040 which will be finalized and integrated with the Unified Plan in FY 2016.

Planning staff collaborated with Utah DAQ on current air quality issues including PM2.5 SIP development, PM 10 SIP Issues in Utah County and emerging AirQuality issues in the Uintah Basin Planning staff and stakeholders formed a statewide Active Transportation Coordination Committee.

An Integrated Transportation Workshop was sponsored

by UDOT Planning and transportation agencies and focused on planning for a seamless, integrated transportation system.

Road Respect educates drivers and cyclists about the rules of the road

State Planning is funded through the Federal Highway Administration’s State Planning and Research Program. UDOT’s planning functions include: Long Range Planning – an ongoing, collaborative, comprehensive effort culminating in a documented plan every four years.

Community Planning – Providing data and expert guidance to develop Community Transportation Plans for local areas.

Air Quality – Working with regulatory agencies and local MPOs to assure compliance with federal air quality rules TravelWise and Road Respect – working with the Governor’s office and private industry to encourage trip reduction strategies for road users and administering the Road Respect safety program.

Active Transportation – Identifying facility improvements through the Collaborative Active Transportation Study.

Travel Demand Management – forecasting future impacts to roadways, transit, and freight-moving corridors.

Rail and Freight Planning – working with industry partners to improve interstate freight and passenger vehicle travel.

Fund Code: SPR

Page 144

State Research FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $1.5 million 2017 proposed: $ 1.5 million 2018 proposed: $ 1.5 million 2019 proposed: $ 1.5 million

CONTACT

Cameron Kergaye 801-965-2576 ckergaye@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS The annual UTRAC Workshop, a collaborative effort among researchers and UDOT experts to identify research priorities, was held in March 2015.

Participants ranked projects according to high-need areas.

The UDOT Research Division works with FHWA, other public agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector to support research and provide high-value information to the transportation community.

Research Division activities include: • Identifying implementable research ideas • Managing research projects • Publishing and presenting reports, results and recommendations • Promoting new technologies through tours or demonstrations • Providing library services • Working with other states on pool-funded research in areas of concern UDOT Research Division annual funding for research projects is provided through the Federal State Planning and Research Program. Additional funding is provided by the state of utah and other federal programs.

Research activities are federally mandated.

Research projects are conducted by university and consultant researchers with oversight by State Research Division staff and help from other divisions. Research staff are currently managing 40 SPR funded research projects and 13 state funded projects.

UDOT Research Division activities provide opportunities for university students to engage in high-value research to benefit the transportation community.

Fund Code: SPR

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Alternative Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Emergency Relief Fund FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding Funding varies. Up to $100 million is available to a state for each natural disaster or catastrophic failure.

The federal Emergency Relief Program is a special program from the Highway Trust Fund for the repair or reconstruction of Federal-aid highways and roads on Federal lands which have suffered serious damage as a result of natural disasters or catastrophic failures from an external cause, and not an inherent flaw in the facility.

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

ER funding helped UDOT repair damage to SR-14 caused by a landslide.

Approved ER funds are available at the pro-rata share that would normally apply to the Federal-aid facility damaged. For Interstate highways, the Federal share is 90 percent. For all other highways, the Federal share is 80 percent.

Emergency repair work to restore essential travel, minimize the extent of damage, or protect the remaining facilities, accomplished in the first 180 days after the disaster occurs, may be reimbursed at 100 percent federal share.

It is the responsibility of the State to request ER funds based on detailed damage inspection reports (DDIR) prepared by the Department of Transportation. An emergency declaration by the Governor allows the state DOT to file a notice of intent with the FHWA office to initiate the ER application process.

Page 146

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Metropolitan Planning Organizations FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $2.8 million 2017 proposed: $2.8 million 2018 proposed: $2.8 million 2019 proposed: $2.8 million

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

Metropolitan Planning Organizations are the federally mandated and funded transportation planning entity for urban areas with a population over 50 thousand.

MPOs act as a partner in coordination with cities, counties, transit and state transportation agencies to develop and recommend improvements to highways and transit.

Utah’s MPOs each develop a 30-year Regional Transportation Program, called the Long-Range Plan and a Transportation Improvement Program. The LRP is produced every four years and lists capacity-driven projects addressing longterm mobility needs.

THE PLANNING PROCESS Transportation planning is a cooperative process designed to foster involvement by all users of the system through a proactive public participation process. Utah’s MPOs include: Cache Metropolitan Planning Organization - MPO for Cache Valley urban area Dixie Metropolitan Planning Organization - MPO for the St. George urban area Mountainland Association of Governments - MPO for the Provo and Orem urban area Wasatch Front Regional Council - MPO for the Salt Lake City and Ogden urban areas

Strategic, data-based planning helps identify and prioritize projects that address delay.

The TIP is produced annually and includes capacity projects from the LRP and short-term projects (such as pavement or operational improvements) from federal, state, and local governments and transit agencies.

UDOT’s State Transportation Improvement Program – the STIP – includes projects from the LRP and TIP.

PL_MAG PL_WFRC

Page 147

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Alternative Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Federal Funds Exchange CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov Recent Funds Exchanges:

The Federal Funds Exchange Program allows local governments to exchange federal transportation funds for state funds.

The program provides funding flexibility for local governments. UDOT coordinates with the Joint Highway Committee and/or the Metropolitan Planning Organization to determine appropriate projects for the exchange.

Funds exchanges are made frequently and the project purpose and fund amount vary. Examples include: North Salt Lake exchanged $2 million of funds from the I-15 South Davis County Operational Upgrades project to fund improvements on the 2600 South intersection improvement project.

The Town of Virgin exchanged $2 million of 2014 STP_Rural Federal funds for $1.25 million of Region Fourâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2014 State Preservation funds, and $0.45 million of Region Four State Preservation Efficiency funds.

Virgin Town supplied the required 10% match to fund the US-50; Scipio to County Line, MP 129.816 to MP 149.13 Lane Level/Chip Seal Coat project.

US-50 Funds Exchange projects are approved by the Utah Transportation commission.

Once approved, local governments and UDOT enter into a cooperative agreement that details the required project documentation, performance reporting and invoice submission. A UDOT project manager oversees the activities detailed in the agreement.

Approved exchanges are transacted in the year federal-aid funds are available.

Funds are used on other federal-eligible projects.

Eligible funding categories include STP Non-urban (Rural), STP Small Urban, and STP Urban. The exchange is $.85 state funds for each dollar of federal funds.

Local governments are required to match 10 percent of total project costs. If a flexible match is offered, the details will be included in the agreement with value not to exceed UDOT average prices.

Page 148

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Safe Routes to Schools FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The SRTS Program funds programs, tools and infrastructure projects that support a safe walking or riding environment for children traveling to and from neighborhood schools.

Programmed funding 2016: $.5 million 2017 proposed: $.5 million 2018 proposed: $.5 million 2019 proposed: $.5 million

CONTACT

Cherissa Olson 801 965-4486 cmolsen@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT announced 7 SRTS projects. Since 2007, 69 projects have been funded including infrastructure improvements and activities Since 2009, over 140 thousand students at 249 schools have enjoyed Snap Walk n’ Roll Since 2009, more than 25 thousand students have walked or biked to school at least three times per week during September Since August 2015, the Walking School Bus app has facilitated 217 active walking groups.

Since its launch in 2014, UDOT has tracked over 67 thousand miles walked, 2.2 million tons of emissions saved, and over 88 thousand school trips reduced by using the app to walk to school.

Utah Governor Gary Herbert walks to school with kids during a Walk More in Four event last fall.

Programs include: The Student Neighborhood Access program • SNAP on-line mapping software lets schools create and distribute maps that show the safest walking and biking routes. New software lets schools complete safe routing plans more easily.

• The Walk More in Four event that encourages students in Kindergarten through eighth grade to walk or bike safely to school.

• Snap, Walk ‘n Roll Assemblies are free to schools and teach students bicycle and pedestrian safety and how to stay safe around road work • UDOT’s Walking School Bus App that creates route plans and alerts parents when students have arrived at school Crossing Guard Training: The UDOT Crossing Guard Fundamentals DVD and Quick Reference are aids to law enforcement agencies who have the responsibility to train crossing guards.

Infrastructure Projects: Improvements, such as sidewalks, paved trails and installed bike racks are eligible for funding.

Fund Code: TAP

Page 149

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 151

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Federal and Combined Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Signs and Culverts FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $3 million Program ends after 2016

CONTACT

Region Program Managers & John Thomas 801 965-4150 jthomas@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT Region Two replaced signs in th Salt Lake City area in 2014-15.

Federal National Highway Performance Program and Highway Safety Improvement Program funding will help UDOT improve signs and culverts.

SIGNS: Freeway signs provide direction and clarity for road users. Federal funding will help UDOT replace overhead signs in on critical travel and corridors in Salt Lake County.

CULVERTS: Effective drainage systems rely on functioning culverts to preserve safety and to keep pavement healthy. Malfunctioning culverts can cause hazardous conditions to develop suddenly, and can cause pavement or the road base to erode over time. Federal funding will allow UDOT to focus on improving badly distorted or corroded culverts.

Region Two had many pipe lining projects in 2014.

Region Four has used this funding to improve culverts.

Region One will have many culvert projects in the construction phase in Davis, Weber and Box Elder Counties during 2016.

Signs and culverts are important roadway assets that support safety and mobility.

UDOT has been collecting roadway asset information in order to identify the signs and culverts that need to be replaced. Projects will be integrated with other road work. UDOT Regions will help prioritize project selection.

In 2012, UDOT completed a four-year project to collect baseline culvert data on over 30 thousand cross-cut culverts that direct water off of pavement. Most UDOT culverts are in good condition but some are in need of rehabilitation or replacement. The statewide culvert condition data is accessible online via a central database at UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Map Center.

Fund Code: 11903 (culverts), 11904 (signs)

Page 152

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Contingency Funds FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funds per region: 2016: $1 million 2017 proposed: $1 million 2018 proposed: $1 million 2019 proposed: $1 million

Contingency Funds are provided to UDOT regional offices and UDOT Central Program Development to assist local areas with unanticipated, critical or emergency needs.

Projects are conducted in partnership with local governments and are intended to meet needs associated with the state highway system. Most projects are small and include improving drainage, repairing and optimizing signals or improving safety on a pedestrian facility. Each region receives $1 million each state fiscal year with the remaining funds to be used by the Program Development Engineer.

CONTACT

Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Region Four Contingency Fund project examples: Wildlife collision mitigation at various locations, San Juan County project partner Hurricane City Drainage Agreement, SR-9, Hurricane City project partner Electrocrete mat, US-89, UDWR and BLM project partners Curb and gutter on US-89; milepost 164.86 to 164.9, Junction Town project partner Curb and gutter on US-89, milepost 157-158, Circleville Town project partner Turn lanes at Salina Industrial Park, SR-24, Sevier County and Salina City project partners Ferron Creek rip-rap project, UDWR project partner

A curb and gutter project on U.S. 89 in Junction

PIN: 5599, 5589 5597, 5591 Funding Code: ST_CONT_R#

Page 153

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Alternative Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Jurisdictional Transfers FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $.8 million 2017: $.3 million 2018: $.3 million 2019: $.3 million

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

Jurisdictional Transfer Funds are used to assist with physical improvements deemed necessary on the roadway before a transfer is completed, or they may be included as a part of the transfer agreement.

State Law: 72-4-102. Additions to or deletions from state highway system -Designation of highways as state highways between sessions.

(1) (a) The Legislature may add to or delete highways or sections of highways from the state highway system. (b) The department shall annually submit to the Legislature a list of highways or sections of highways the commission recommends for addition to or deletion from the state highway system.

Some recent Jurisdictional Transfers:

Utah Administrative Rule:

A portion of SR 107 in West Point City was deleted from the State Highway System and transferred to West Point City.

UDOT paid a one-time lump sum of $130 thousand to help West Point City to maintain the roadway.

92

129

146

296

Utah County exchanged North County Boulevard for a portion of SR 146 and a $3.3 million lump sum to be used for future maintenance. North County Boulevard is now SR-129.

74

89

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Region Four and Helper City recommended a jurisdictional transfer of ownership from the State to Helper City on SR-244, MP 0.189 to MP 0.91. UDOT will pay Helper City $750,000 to take ownership, based on ten years of maintenance and roadway improvement costs.

180

R926. Transportation, Program Development.

R926-2. Evaluation of Proposed Additions to or Deletions from the State Highway System.

Purpose of the rules is to establish the following: (1) a process for a highway authority to propose additions to or deletions from the state highway system; (2) a procedure for evaluating requested additions to or deletions from the state highway system; and (3) a set of criteria by which proposed changes shall be consistently evaluated.

§ ¦ ¨ 15

Transfer to Local Jurisdiction The route marked SR-146 in redto be shows former SRNew State Route 129 146, which was transferred to Uinta County’s jurisdiction. The route marked in blue shows new Exhibit 'A' SR 129.

PIN: 6672 Fund Code: ST_HWY_TRNSF

November '14

Page 154

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Public Communication Efforts FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand

Communication programs improve safety and mobility by providing messages, real-time traffic information, and construction updates so road users can make wise travel choices.

CONTACT

Joseph Walker 385 223-5233 josephwalker@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS A growing number of followers receive traffic, construction, weather and safety messages on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram.

UDOT launched the “Monday Messages” overhead VMS safety campaign. Popular messages included “That seat belt looks good on you,” “Turn signals: the original instant message” and “Get your head out of your apps.”

Media outreach resulted in more than 2,000 stories, including the South Davis I-15 opening, new lanes on The Point, new VMS “Message Monday” campaign, new snow plow tracker on the UDOT Traffic app and the innovative conveyor belt bridge over I-15 at the Point of the Mountain.

UDOT launched “Heads Up,” a Zero Fatalities campaign aimed at protecting pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists.

UDOT’S John Gleason on camera. Communication programs provide useful information to help road users make good travel decisions.

UDOT Traffic website and smart phone app: Provides live cameras, real-time traffic conditions, and statewide construction information. Special messages are integrated to communicate with diverse audiences.

Media Relations: Media coverage prior to major construction-related closures or long-term traffic impacts helps optimize mobility and showcase helpful innovations such as new intersection designs or variable speed limit signs.

TravelWise Outreach: Promoting trip reduction strategies like teleworking, carpooling or taking public transit, helps road users avoid delays, save energy, and help benefit air quality. New TravelWise Alerts, provided through the UDOT Traffic app, urge drivers to reduce trips during bad air quality days or major weather events.

Zero Fatalities Campaign: Messages attack drowsy driving, distracted driving, aggressive driving, impaired driving and not buckling up, through powerful TV and radio ads, public events, websites, driver education classes and media coverage.

ePM Master PIN: 8922 Fund Code: ST_PR

Page 155

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

State Park Access FUNDING

Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1

The State Park Access Program provides state matching funds for projects on local roads that provide access to state parks.

Programmed funding 2016: $500 thousand 2017 proposed: $500 thousand 2018 proposed: $500 thousand 2019 proposed: $500 thousand

CONTACT

Chris Potter 801 965-4403 cpotter@utah.gov

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Millsite State Park Access, Emery County project sponsor.

Escalante State Park and Kodachrome Basin State Park Access Roads, Garfield County project sponsor.

The Grand Parade formation at Kodachrome State Park.

Municipalities may apply to the Joint Highway Committee for state funds to make necessary improvements and repairs. Participation in the program requires local governments to provide half of project funding. Improving access to state parks helps support the tourism industry in Utah.

State parks benefit the state by: • Generating $9.85 in local economic impact for every $1 of general fund appropriation • Generating $67 million in state economic benefit through day-use, camping and golf • Paying $11.2 million to individual counties in 2010 property tax for off-highway vehicles and boats • Collecting and paying more than million in state and local taxes to counties and communities For more information on the economic benefits of state parks, see www. stateparks.utah.gov

Funding Code: ST_PK_ACCESS

Page 156

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 157

State Park Access Program Reg

County

Route

BMP

EMP

PIN

3

WASATCH

3128P

0

2

10886

3 4 4

WASATCH EMERY WASHINGTON

3128P 0303P

0 0 0

2 2 0

12947 13889 10888

Project Location PIN Description Cnty:FA-3132; MP .00 - 7.51 & Cnty:FA-3128; MP .00 - 1.69 & Wasatch State Park Access Road Surfacing, Phase Wasatch State Park Access Road 1 Cnty:FA-3128; MP .00 - 1.69 & Cnty:FA-3132; MP 6.62 - 7.51 & Wasatch Mtn. State Park Access Rd., Guardsman Pass in Wasatch Wasatch Mtn. State Park Access Rd., Guardsman County Pass SR-303; MP .00 - 1.77 & Cnty:FA-1650; MP .00 - 5.86 & Cnty:FA-1636Goblin Valley/Millsite State Parks Chip Seal Entrance to Snow Canyon State Park Snow Canyon State Park Access Road

Project Value

Planned Year

$

1,400,000

2017

$ $ $

1,000,000 1,127,000 400,000

2019 2016 2018

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 159

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Alternative Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Utah State Infrastructure Bank FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2014 Capitalized total: $23.5 million 2016 Uncommitted Balance Available: zero

The Utah State Infrastructure Bank provides loans and credit enhancement to local government or private sponsors of transportation or transit projects.

The loans hep state agencies leverage federal and non-federal transportation funds, assist local areas to develop facilities, and promote public-private partnerships. Loans can offer advantages over only grant-based funding by allowing project delivery to be accelerated by and helping local governments complete a financial plan.

CONTACT

The fixed-rate, low-interest loans are tied to the State of Utah bonding rate and term length. Repayment must be completed no more than ten years from the time the loan is executed. No one entity may borrow more than twenty five percent of the fund.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The Utah Transportation Commission has the authority to approve all qualified requests and loan terms. SIB loans can augment other project funding.

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

St. George City, Logan City and Washington City have recently completed loans. Fountain Green City West Jordan City and Cedar City currently have outstanding loans and projects are underway. Vineyard City has recently been approved for a loan.

The fund is a revolving account that does not deplete. Prior to 2012, the fund was capitalized at $4 million, including interest. House Bill 377, which passed in the 2012 legislative session, added $20 million to the account.

Project example: Cedar City obtained a SIB loan to augment other funding to improve the South Cedar Interchange

SIB funds helped Cedar City complete a much needed project on I-15: 1-3, new ramps,a DDI, realignment and new profile of Cross Hollow Road; 4-5, the old flyover was saved for a pedestrian and livestock crosswalk and surplus property was utilized, and 6, the interchange area was landscaped.

PL_CMPO PL_DMPO

Page 160

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

Alternative Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Permanent Community Impact Board CONTACT

Candace Powers CIB Program Manager Utah Department of Workforce Services 801 468-0131 cpowers@utah.gov

Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Permanent Community Impact Board provides grants and loans to mitigate damage to public facilities caused by mineral extraction or development on federal lands.

Funding for the grants and loans comes from lease royalties that are returned to state government from mineral extraction industries.

Government agencies and political subdivisions are eligible to apply. Grant and loan amounts are generally limited to $5 million.

Eligible activities include reconstruction, construction and planning, study and design with a 50 percent funding match. Applicants cannot use in-kind funds as local matching funds unless that participation has a demonstrable value such as real property. Donated staff or labor cannot be used as local matching funds.

Funded projects must include public participation, including notification of intent to seek CIB funding or financing and a formal public hearing to receive comment on the size and scope of the project.

CIB FUNDING CYCLE

Page 161

UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS

State Funds

Program Development & STIP Spring 2016

Region Concept Development FUNDING

State year: July 1 Programmed funding per region: 2016: $150 thousand 2017 proposed: $150 thousand 2018 proposed: $150 thousand 2019 proposed: $150 thousand

CONTACT

William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov

The Region Concept Development program allocates funding to the each of the four UDOT Regions to study and develop a practical scope, schedule, budget, and list of potential risks for future projects.

These studies are normally completed for major construction projects, including reconstruction, choke point, and passing lanes.

Following the April Transportation Commission meeting, each region begins identifying projects for the next Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Workshop. Each Region is allocated $100,000 to complete concept reports that reflect a practical budget, scope and summary of risks for the purpose of project selection.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Region Four Concept Development project examples: US-191; Peterâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Hill Slide, $100 thousand SR-143; Culvert Replacement at milepost 3.6, $15 thousand I-15; Brigham Road to Dixie Drive, $15 thousand I-15; SR-9 to Washington Parkway, south bound auxiliary lane, $15 thousand

The Region Concept Development program allocates funding to each of the four UDOT Regions.

PIN: 8752, 8754, 8756, 8758 Funding Code: ST_REG#_CONC_D

Page 162

Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop

PROJECTS

Page 163

UTAH DEPARTMENT

OF

TRANSPORTATION

2016 STIP Workshop