Utah Department of TransportaĆ&#x;on
2016 - STIP Workshop
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
TABLE of CONTENTS PROCESS STIP Process STIP Process Yearly Calendar STIP Charts Utah Code — Commission Duties PROGRAM Pavement Program 2016 – 2019 Structures Program 2016 – 2020 Grant Requests Fast Act Overview Strategic Direction & Performance Metrics Federal Program State Program PROJECTS Choke Points and Other Priorities TIF Choke Point Pavement Bridge HSIP Operations and Safety TAP Freight Rail Federal Other State Other
3 4 5 6 12 13 14 15 18 26 37 39 40 48 56 76 88 96 112 118 122 130 153
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROCESS
Page 3
PROJECT SPECIFIC APPROVAL FUNDS C. Year
New STIP FY 2017
TIF Statewide List (Program Development)
Current Year
Statewide List (with Regional Priority)
Commission Approved List
Statewide List (Structures)
New This Year *
CH OKE POI NT
BRIDGE
FR E I G H T Statewide List (Program Development)
Preliminary Programs
Region Lists
S T B G P ( T A P )
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
PROGRAM LIST APPROVAL FUN DS C. Year
New STIP FY 2017
H I G H V O L U M E
Current Year
L OW V OL U M E Commission Approved List
ASSE T
*
SAFE T Y S T A T E P R O G R A M S
Years vary by program
Any New Project Funded, Not on FFY 17 STIP Lists, Requires Commission Action Preliminary Programs
CONT I NG E NCY
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROCESS
Page 5
Utah Code 72-1-303. Duties of commission‌... (1) The commission has the following duties: (a) Determining priorities and funding levels of projects in the state transportation systems for each fiscal year based on project lists compiled by the department; (c) Holding public hearings and otherwise providing for public input in transportation matters; (2) (a) For projects prioritized with funding provided under Sections 72-2124 and 72-2-125, the commission shall annually report‌. (i)
A prioritized list of the new transportation capacity projects in the state transportation system and the funding levels available for those projects; and
(i)
the unfunded highway construction and maintenance needs within the state.
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROCESS
Page 7
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROCESS
Page 9
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROCESS
Page 11
Pavement Program Recommendations 2016
Estimated
Estimated
2017
2018
Estimated
2019
Notes
Funding
Federal Amount State Pavement HVR State Pavement LVR Code 1 Maintenance Total State & Federal
$ $ $ $ $
203,574,886 12,000,000 17,000,000 10,000,000 242,574,886
$ 192,075,114 $ 650,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 242,725,114
$ 188,050,000 $ 1,950,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 240,000,000
$ $ $ $ $
186,850,000 3,150,000 40,000,000 10,000,000 240,000,000
dTIMS Model Recommendation for Pavements
LVR & HVR combined
$
217,000,000
$ 240,000,000
$ 240,000,000
$
240,000,000 maintaining High and Low Volume pavement conditions for
$
10,000,000
$
10,000,000
$
10,000,000
$
10,000,000 Maintenance Managment Quality Assurance (MMQA)
$ $ $
17,000,000 30,000,000 160,000,000
$ 40,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 160,000,000
$
40,000,000
$
40,000,000
$ 190,000,000
$
190,000,000
$ $ $ $ $
2,592,500 1,232,500 1,785,000 11,390,000 17,000,000
$ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000
$ $ $ $ $
6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000
Low Volume Roads
$ $ $ $ $
32,000,000 40,000,000 35,200,000 52,800,000 160,000,000
$ 38,000,000 $ 47,500,000 $ 41,800,000 $ 62,700,000 $ 190,000,000
$ $ $ $ $
38,000,000 47,500,000 41,800,000 62,700,000 190,000,000
High Volume Roads
Choke Point & Other Priorities $
25,574,886
UDOT Maintenance LVR Program HVR Program Distributions 15.25% 7.25% 10.50% 67.00% 20.00% 25.00% 22.00% 33.00%
4/12/2016
Major Rehabilitation Distributed to Regions
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4
Region Proposed Spilts
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4
(45 / 55) (40 / 60) (35 / 65) (55 / 45)
6,100,000 2,900,000 4,200,000 26,800,000 40,000,000
$ 32,000,000 $ 40,000,000 $ 35,200,000 $ 52,800,000 $ 160,000,000
$
2,725,114
Funding available in 2016, and recommended by dTIMs for 2017-2019.
2016 and 2017, Programmed HVR Major Rehab. Project High Volume Roads to reach the $207M available in 2016, and $230M (2017 2019) dTIMs recommendation
Total $
28,300,000
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 13
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 14
Utah Department of Transportation Programming - FAST Act Highway Program 2016-2020 Summary and Impact on Utah January 27, 2016
Highway Program Highway funding: After several years of flat funding, the FAST Act provides modest increases to states over the five-year life of the bill. While Utah’s apportionment in the first year of the FAST Act will rise by five percent to $352 million from the current $335 million, the majority of that increase is apportioned to a new category of funding to address freight mobility needs. More modest increases of 1 to 2% will be realized in existing funding categories. After the initial increase, overall funding rises by about two percent per year until the bill’s final year ($385 million in FFY 2020). Distribution formulas were not changed in FAST Act. It should be noted that apportionments don’t reflect the actual funding that will be available on an annual basis through obligation limitations provided through annual appropriations. Freight: FAST Act creates two new programs designed to help states and local governments plan for and fund freight mobility projects. National Highway Freight Program (NEW): The National Highway Freight Program is distributed to states by formula for highway freight improvement projects. UDOT will receive $10 million in the first year of this program, with steady increases to over $13 million in FFY 2020. This is funding is intended to direct more resources to freight movement. States, in cooperation with US DOT are directed to designate a national freight network consisting of all Interstates, an additional 41,000 primary freight network highway miles. States are required to use formula dollars to complete a State Freight Plan, either standalone or part of a state’s long-range transportation plan. Utah has recently completed a freight plan (See Utah Freight Plan. The plans must be updated every 5 years. States can use up to 10 percent of these funds for intermodal and freight rail projects. Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) (NEW): This is a new competitive grant program. Authority for selection is administered by the FHWA. Projects that cost the minimum of at least $100 million, 30 percent of a state’s apportioned total, are eligible. In addition, 10 percent of total funding is reserved for small projects and 25 percent is set aside for rural projects. Multimodal, non-highway projects are eligible for grants but a cumulative $500 million cap on these type projects over the five year authorization is set. Federal share is limited to 60 percent of project cost, though other federal dollars can be used as non-Federal match as long as the total amount of Federal dollars, do not exceed 80 percent of project cost. Congress retained the authority to veto any projects proposed for this grant funding. Eligible applicants include states, large Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), local governments, ports, tribal governments, or combinations of these organizations. State freight advisory committee: The Secretary of Transportation shall encourage each State to establish a freight advisory committee consisting of a representative cross-section of public and private sector freight stakeholders, including representatives of ports, freight railroads, shippers, carriers, freight-related associations, third-party logistics providers, the freight industry workforce, the transportation department of the State, and local governments. Role of the Committee: ● Advise the State on freight-related priorities, issues, projects, and funding needs
● ● ● ●
Serve as a forum for discussion for State transportation decisions affecting freight mobility Communicate and coordinate regional priorities with other organizations Promote the sharing of information between the private and public sectors on freight issues Participate in the development of the freight plan of the State described in section
Surface Transportation Program conversion: FAST Act changes the name of the Surface Transportation Program to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP). Along with the name change come other important updates: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP): The amount going to local governments increases 1% per year from 51 percent to 55 percent over the life of the bill, decreasing the state’s share of these funds. The FAST Act maintains the off system bridge set-aside. This will result in an increase in funding to Utah MPO’s and JHC. Transportation Alternatives Program: Under current law, the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a standalone program for funding bike, pedestrian, and other alternative projects. FAST Act deletes the existing federal authorization for TAP and moves it into the STBGP as a set-aside. Nationally TAP is currently funded at $820 million annually; FAST increases that figure to $835 million in FY 2016 and FY 2017 and then to $850 million per year. Project eligibility continues to include bike trails and transit oriented projects but is also expanded to include local transportation safety initiatives. Non-Profits are also now eligible to apply for this set aside for STBGP funding. The recreational Trails program set-aside maintained as a portion of these funds. Require a “competitive process” to be able to distribute. Large MPO’s may flex up to 50% of their funding for any STP-eligible project. Also adds the requirement that MPO’s must distribute, “in consultation with the relevant state”.
The National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): Consistent with MAP-21, the NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward achievement of performance targets established in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS. A new provision allows for improvements to bridges that are on-system, non-NHS. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ): The FAST Act makes several small changes to CMAQ. These changes include: expanding the diesel retrofit program to equipment and vehicles that are port-related; exempting low-population states from PM 2.5 attainment requirements in certain instances; and allow for the use of CMAQ funds to be used not only for attainment of ambient air quality standards but also to maintain standards in an attainment area. Highway Safety Improvement Program: The FAST Act eliminates the current eligibility for HSIP funds to be used for certain types of non-infrastructure safety programs, such as education and enforcement activities. Planning, Performance Measures, and Asset Management: ● Eliminates the need for State DOTs to collect safety data and information on unpaved/gravel roads. ● If a State DOT does not achieve or make significant progress toward achieving targets in any performance measurement area after one reporting cycle, State must submit a report describing the actions they will undertake to achieve their targets in the future. ● No significant changes to the performance-based planning process established in MAP-21. ● Expands the scope of the planning process to include addressing resiliency and reliability as well as enhancing travel and tourism of the transportation system. ● Requires State DOTs to incorporate the performance measures of a transit agency not represented by a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) into its long range transportation plan regardless if it is in an urban or rural area.
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 16
Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP): FLAP funding starts at an annual $250 million nationwide under FAST Act – the same as current levels. Funding then steps up by $5 million annually to $270 million by 2020. The current distribution formula for the program is highly favorable to Utah, and that formula was not changed by the act. Environmental Streamlining- Project Delivery: The Act retains the improvements in the environmental review and planning process to expedite project delivery made in MAP-21 and adds new reforms. The Act makes numerous changes that allow more projects to be included as “Categorical Exclusions” (CE) which is a far quicker and less involved environmental review. The Act included multi-modal projects and rail projects as CEs and indexes to inflation the size of projects that can be covered by a CE. The Act allows states that have opted to take responsibility for the Federal NEPA environmental review (California and Texas so far with several other applying) to use their own state environmental process as long as it’s as stringent as the NEPA process. US DOT and other Federal lead agencies are given more authority to set schedules, deadlines and establish more coordination between agencies with review responsibilities. The Act also aligns environmental reviews for historic properties. The Act allows for actions and reviews taken during the planning stage to be used to satisfy requirements during the environmental stage. Also limits the need to consider project alternatives during the environmental process if they have been considered during the planning process. Regulatory requirements under NEPA and other federal regulations for the repair or reconstruction of a bridge, road, highway railway or transit facility damaged by an emergency can either be waived or expedited. The Act allows states to bundle similar bridge projects into one project and award as a single Transparency: Creates a new requirement for states to provide an annual report on all projects over $25 million comparing the estimated cost at the beginning of the project with its final cost and includes an explanation about revisions in scope or other factors impacting project costs or overruns.
FURTHER INFORMATION Contact: Bill Lawrence @ (801) 964-4468, BillLawrence@utah.gov
STRATEGIC DIRECTION and PERFORMANCE METRICS
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 18
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 20
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 22
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 24
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 25
4/12/2016
2016
Estimated
Estimated
2017
2018
Estimated
2019
UDOT Federal Program (Including Match) Total
$
305,100,000
$
310,800,000
$
316,400,000
$
Choke Point
$
35,000,000
$
47,486,147
$
47,848,852
$
53,321,859 Program Recommendations - Capacity
Bridge
$
18,000,000
$
25,000,000
$
33,000,000
$
33,000,000 Program Recommendations - Structures
Freight
$
10,618,122
$
10,363,739
$
11,305,897
$
12,719,134 Required Program Type - Freight
Planning & Res
$
8,663,263
$
8,700,000
$
8,700,000
$
Safety
$
23,525,503
$
24,384,857
$
24,849,162
$
322,800,000
8,700,000 Required Program Type - Planning and Research 25,304,670 Required Program Type - Safety
STP-TA Set-a-side
$
2,181,919
$
2,253,835
$
2,109,780
$
2,368,028 Required Program Type - Transportation Alternatives
STP-TA SR2S
$
536,308
$
536,308
$
536,308
$
536,308 Program Recommendation - Safe Routes To Schools
Signs & Culverts
$
3,000,000
Balance for High Volume Roads & Other Priorities
$
203,574,886
$
192,075,114
$
188,050,000
$
Program Recommendations - Signs & Culverts 186,850,000 Program Recommendations - Pavements & Other Priorities
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 26
Federal Program Funding & Projections **DRAFT** Commission STIP Workshop Preparation 2016 Pavement & Bridge Programs
FEDERAL AID – FFY 17 $359.5 Million*
$264.6 $ 288.6
+ $22.2
$310.8
Million
Million $47.5
M Choke Pt.
(Federal + Match )
$30
$
UDOT
$288.6
Million
+
(Match required to obtain total programming level)
$8.6
$25.0
302.2 Million
Match $22.2 Million
M Maj. Rehab. M Bridge
$2.7
M Choke Pt. & Other Priorities $159.4
Million High Volume Roads
Million Freight $10.4 Million
Local & Pass Through $70.9 Million
State Plan. & Research $8.6 M
STP-TAP Conv. TAP $2.8 Million Safety $24.4 Million
*2017 Apportionment Estimate Updated April 2016
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 32
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 34
DRAFT
Chokepoints and Other Priorities Recommended List
Region PIN Project Name 1 14407 SR‐39; Dual Lefts at Washington 1
2
3 4 4
SR‐235; Intersection Improvements 14408 at 2700 North
I‐80; Parley's Summit to Jeremy 11828 Ranch WB Truck LN
SR‐114; Realignment & Signal at 400 12159 N in Orem US‐6; EB Passing Lane MP 291.7 to 12577 293.7 14366 SR‐9; West Rockville, WB Passing
4
SR‐276; Ferry Ramp Extensions
4
US 6; Helper to Blanding
S
Statewide Zero Fatalities Campaign
1 1
Additional Needs SR‐101; Texas turndowns and 14517 guardrail upgrades 14527 I‐15; Barrier Extensions, Ogden
1
14539 SR‐167; Mill & Fill; Various Area
1 1
14507 SR‐30; Texas Turndown Removal 14535 SR‐105; Mill & Fill, MP 0.3‐.035
2
13456 SR‐248 to Bearhollow
2
$5,000,000 Wildlife mitigation
This project is currently funded for $17M but we are asking for additional funds for Wildlife mitigation. There have been several hits of wildlife along this part of I‐80 and UDOT as well as the community here is concerned about this and wants to come up with some solutions.
$6,500,000 Eliminate "S" Curve & Install Warranted Signal
This is the project we really want, but we can't obligate it soon enough, so we plan to do the two pavement projects below first and then do this project in place of some future pavement projects.
$3,500,000 Passing Lane $3,000,000 Passing Lane Extend Halls Crossing Ramp, Relocate Bull Frog $3,300,000 Ramp & Ferry Engine Retrofit
$2,000,000 Zero Fatalites Campaign
$500,000 Texas turndowns and guardrail upgrades $1,000,000 Barrier extensions on the I‐15 Ramps at 5600 Fix failing pavement in various locations on $200,000 Trappers Loop (SR‐167) Remove Texas Turndowns on SR‐30 in Box Elder $500,000 County $150,000 Repair failing pavement spots on Parrish (SR‐105)
$10,000,000 Widen Bridge
13454 SR‐209; Redwood rd to Jordan river
$250,000 For curb & gutter and bike lanes
2 2
I‐215 @ 3900 S. 13762 Replace Cattle Guards
$4,000,000 Increase the merge length $450,000 Replace Failing Cattle Guards in Tooele County
3
12310 SR‐45; MP 14 to Glen Ranch Rd.
$3,000,000 1 1/2 inch mill, HMA, Microsurface
3 4
12196 14327
4
12605
4
14365
4
14334
4
14381
SR‐73; Tooele‐ Utah Co. Line to MP 25 Cedar Fort I‐15; Flexible Delineators, MP ‐ MP US‐191; 400 N. Moab to Colorado River Bridge SR‐59; Connecting 2 Passing Lanes, MP 17.3‐17.8 SR‐118; Bridge Widening Over Sevier River I‐15; Wildlife Fencing and Cattle Guards
Total =
From existing fiber backbone, extend fiber to Maintenance Stations for communications and new CCTV cameras between Helper and Blanding. Federal HSIP funds are no longer eligible for this program. The recommendation is to trade $2 Million of state pavement dollars in the LVR, and put in STP federal funds. This will be funded by the increase due to FAST Act.
$28,300,000
$300,000 For drainage repair
SR‐111 @ 7600 S.
Comments
$2,000,000 Intersection and turning lane improvements
$500,000 ATMS Fiber and ITS devices
Total =
2
Funds Concept $2,500,000 Add dual left turning movements in alll directions
This money would be combined with an OB project to do the drainage repair at the same time SR‐111 goes under a narrow RR bridge where the lanes are narrower and basicly no shoulder. This project would widen that bridge and the pavement to get full shoulders and lane widths. This money would be combined with an OB project. This project is where I‐80 EB goes to I‐215 SB. This project would improve the merge area at 3900 S. as the traffic has a decision point at 3900 S. and I‐215.
We want to move this project up from 2017 to 2016.
1 inch Mill, 1 1/2 inch HIR, 1 1/2 inch HMA, Chip We want to add $2.5M to this existing 2016 project $2,500,000 Seal to extend the limits. $500,000 Replace existing Delineators with the flexible type $13,500,000 Widen Existing Facility, Drainage $850,000 Passing Lane Extension $800,000 Widen Structure, New Parapets Install Deer Fence, Double Cattleguards, North of $2,900,000 Cedar City
$41,400,000
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 39
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Transportation Investment Fund (TIF) FUNDING
State year: July 1
TIF funding is primarily used for improving or optimizing capacity. Projects built using TIF finding also qualify for maintenance using TIF funding.
Programmed funding 2016 $273 million 2017 proposed: $331 million 2018 proposed: $405 million 2019 proposed: $425 million 2020 proposed: $434 million 2021 proposed: $430 million 2022 proposed: $447 million 2023 proposed: $472 million
CONTACT
Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS The TIF has funded many projects that are important to current and future mobility needs, including the Mountain View Corridor, a planned freeway in western Salt Lake County and northwestern Utah County. MVC will have phased implementation to address short-term regional needs, and will eventually be a 35mile freeway from I-80 in Salt Lake to Lehi Main Street.
During initial construction of MVC in Salt Lake County, UDOT built two lanes in each direction from Redwood Road to 5400 South.
The fund was created in the 2005 Special Session by House Bill 108 and contains revenue from legislative appropriations, sales tax and vehicle registration fees. In 2005 8.3 percent of sales tax revenue and half of auto-related sales tax was added and in 2011, 30 percent of sales tax growth was added. Once projects funded by the Centennial Highway Fund and Critical Highway Needs Fund are complete, the remaining balance transfers to the TIF.
Other recent projects: Santaquin Main Street, Phase 2 SR-145, Pioneer Crossing Extension SR 26, Riverdale Road over the Rail Road Funding Code: TIF
Page 40
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 41
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 43
Region 1 42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
§ ¦ ¨ 84
91
218 89
13224
81
30
83
38
Logan
C A C H E 30
Randolph
23
102 240
B O X
R I C H
101
165
13
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
10491 39 158
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
13037
Ogden
222
167
11481
13822
D AV I S
11477
M O R G A N
11771
11946
13480
13823
Morgan
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
13824
66
11225
T O O E L E
Coalville Bountiful
67
Wendover
S A L T
S U M M I T
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016-2023
TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund
15
142
23
13055
§ ¦ ¨
Garden City
C A C H E WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
R I C H
Huntsville
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
SALT LAKE
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨
65
Salt Lake City
S U M M I T
11828
150
14413
80
201
36 112
12566
Tooele
Kamas
10603
11827 9418
35
10020 Draper
Heber City
36
10935
150
12587
14412
11203
196
32
40 Park City
248
14412
Grantsville
T O O E L E
13963
8314
138
224
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund
M O R G A N
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
Helper
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016-2023
WEBER B O X
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
RICH
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
191
S A LT L A K E
Grantsville
44
Park City
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
12158
13608
T O O E L E
144
113
92
§ ¦ ¨ 11982
92
146
Lehi
Heber City
D U C H E S N E
35
WASATCH
Provo
10266
89
13394
Tabiona
U TA H
13391
208
Eureka
40
11358
!
88 45
U I N T A H
198 6 ! 6
6
36
13385
Myton
Duchesne
68 141
149
40 !
87 Roosevelt
Springville
77 Vernon
Naples
121
189
10689
Vernal
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
SANPETE
132
132
C A R B O N Helper
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
E M E R Y
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Delta
Scofield
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
M I L L A R D
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016-2023
TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
191
T O O E L E
U T A H
Eureka Mona
132
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
174
28
89
260
99
257
Kanosh
§ ¦ ¨ 70
Salina
E M E R Y
Green River
19 Crescent Jct.
Emery
§ ¦ ¨
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
Richfield
128
119
15
118 161
24
Monroe
70
Milford
24 Moab
72
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
21
6 !
Ferron
10
SE VI ER
118
§ ¦ ¨
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
11978
Clawson
137
50 100
Cleveland
Sterling
Holden
M I L L A R D
GRAND
124 155
Castle Dale
Gunnison
159
122
57
29
123
Marysvale
PIUTE
TIF- Trans porta tion Inve stment Fund
Manti
50
Sunnyside
Wellington
Huntington
Hinckley
50
Price
Ephraim
136
U I N T A H
157
13664
31
Hiawatha
117
125 Delta
116
Helper
264
Fairview
Region 4
CARBON
Scofield
Levan
132
191
96
89
Nephi
J U A B
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
6
313
25
279 Loa
W A Y N E
Hanksville
Bicknell Beaver Minersville
62
153
10787
21
11979
Antimony
130
I R O N
56
G A R F I E L D Boulder
Parowan
46 24
22
89
20
Torrey
Junction
95 211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219 18
11438
§ ¦ ¨ 15
11467 17 Hurricane
13909 7
12780
S A N
89 Glendale
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
J U A N 95
10788
10783
Blanding
Tropic
276
9
9
191
95
14
W A S H I N G T O N 10792
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016-2023
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Choke Point FUNDING
Federal year: October 1
Federal Choke Point funds support projects that relieve localized reoccurring traffic congestion.
Programmed funding 2016: $35.0 million 2017 proposed: $47.5 million 2018 proposed: $47.8 million 2019 proposed: $53.3 million 2020 proposed: $53.3 million
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS The U.S. 89 Improvements in Orem and Pleasant Grove widened State Street to seven lanes, repaved with new asphalt, and upgraded with curb, gutter and new sidewalks in various locations. The project improved traffic flow and reduced congestion in the area with only minor traffic delays during construction.
US-89 was widened to seven lanes in Pleasant Grove and Orem.
Choke points, which occur in rural and urban areas across the state, impinge on economic productivity by delaying delivery of goods and services and slowing commute times. Traffic congestion can also contribute to a less-safe driving environment as drivers break or change lanes suddenly to jockey for position. Sometimes, choke points contribute to poor air quality through stop-and-go driving patterns which result in higher emissions. Projects are scored, ranked and presented to the Utah Transportation Commission for approval of funding within a given STIP year. Scores are based on, average annual daily traffic, constructibility, region priority, level of service and safety.
Fund Code: NHPP STP
Page 48
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 49
FY 2017~2020 CHOKEPOINT PROJECTS Reg 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
County WEBER DAVIS DAVIS DAVIS VARIOUS SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE SALT LAKE UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH
Route 0134P 0015P 0103P 0068P 0089P 0209P 0171P 0089P 0209P 0111P 2074P 2932P 0074P 0089P 0198P 0077P
BMP EMP 11.243 326.611 0 63.65 406.247 6.8 3.36 363.77 7.8 10.118 5.45 0 0 345.05 10.464 6.627
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
WASHINGTON VARIOUS IRON IRON CARBON ROUTE ERROR WASHINGTON KANE
0034P 1.56 0191P 112.5 0015NR05903 0 0130P 6.296 0006P 224 0089P 124.1 0009P 21.2 0089P 46
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PIN 12508 12656 10706 12674 13592 12560 12563 12561 13578 12565 14431 13668 11219 9994 10265 13421
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12844 11433 12576 11532 13408 13409 14363 14364
Project Location SR-134; MP 11.24 - 11.45 I-15; MP 326.61 - 328.35 SR-103; MP .00 - .17 SR-68; MP 63.65 - 64.37 US-89; MP 406.25 - 406.41 SR-209; MP 6.80 - 8.00 SR-171; MP 3.36 - 3.69 US-89; MP 363.77 - 364.79 SR-209; MP 7.80 - 8.80 SR-111; MP 10.12 - 10.60 Cnty:FA-2074; MP 5.45 - 5.60 & SR-210; MP 2.00 - 2.50 Cnty:FA-2932; MP .00 - .14 & US-89; MP 349.91 - 350.29 & SR-73; MP 35.85 SR-74; MP 0.00 - 1.02 US-89; MP 345.05 - 347.45 SR-198; MP 10.46 - 11.57 SR-77; MP 6.63 - 7.20
Project Description SR-134; I-15 interchange modifications I-15; NB Aux Lane Rest Area to 200 N., Kaysville SR-103; SR-126 to I-15 SR-68; I-215 to Center St. US-89; I-84 EB Off-ramp Intersection I-15, 9000 South Interchange SR-171 (3500 South) & 5600 West Intersection US-89, 11400 South to 10600 South SR-209; 90th S- State St. to 700 E. SR-111, SR-201 to 2700 South SR-210 @ Wasatch Dr. Lehi Main & State St. Intersection Area SR-74; Main St. to 740 North, American Fork US-89; State St., 220 So P.G. to 500 East A.F. SR-198; Woodland Hills Dr to Arrowhead Trail in SF SR-77 400 S Springville; SF Main to I-15
Project Value $ 4,500,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 4,300,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 4,672,000 $ 6,132,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 13,800,000 $ 6,698,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 7,022,196 $ 12,990,599 $ 6,800,000 $ 4,400,000
Planned Year 2017 2017 2018 2019 2019 2017 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020
SR-34; MP 1.56 - 1.80 US-191; MP 112.50 - 124.00 TO SR-56 CEDAR CITY; MP .00 - .19 & I-15; MP 58.73 - 59.26 SR-130; MP 6.30 - 9.00 US-6; MP 224.00 - 224.60 US-89; MP 124.10 - 124.40 SR-9; MP 21.20 - 22.90 US-89; MP 46.00 - 49.00
SR-34; St. George Blvd. 900 East to 1000 East US-191; South Moab to Blue Hill I-15; Exit 59 Improvements SR-130; North Cedar to MP 9 US-6; Turn Lanes at Price Cyn. Rec. Area Access US-89; Jct. SR-12 NB Improvements and Lighting SR-9; Mid-Way, EB & WB Passing Lanes US-89; NB Passing Lane, MP 46-49
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020
2,700,000 4,000,000 4,650,000 4,500,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 50
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 51
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
§ ¦ ¨ 84
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
218
15
89
81
30
83
38
30
Logan
Randolph
240
B O X
R I C H
101
165
13
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
39 158
12508
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
Ogden
222
167
10706 13592
M O R G A N Morgan
12656
D A V I S
84
Farmington
66
T O O E L E
Coalville Bountiful
12674
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨
67
S A L T
S U M M I T
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Choke Point
C A C H E
23
102
30
Region 1
Garden City
C A C H E
R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
M O R G A N
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T SALT LAKE
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨ 80
12565
Salt Lake City
12563
65 150
224
12586
138
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
Grantsville
36 112
T O O E L E
21 12561
Tooele
Draper
14431
35 Heber City
1- 13578 2- 12560
196
150
36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
Helper
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Choke Point
D A V I S
80
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
144
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
73
11219
113
92 Lehi
92
146
Heber City
Vernal
35
WASATCH
Naples
121 Tabiona
13668
189
UTAH
208
Provo
Myton Duchesne
77 13421Springville
40 !
U I N T A H
198 6 !
Eureka
88 45
10265 141
36
40
40
9994
68
40 !
87 Roosevelt
89 Vernon
149
6
6
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
Scofield
Helper
132
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
S A N P E T E
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
Delta
C A R B O N
132
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Choke Point
S A LT LA K E
Grantsville
191
6 WASATCH D U C H E S N E U T A H
Eureka Mona
J U A B
132
Scofield
Mount Pleasant
Levan Moroni
132
174
Hiawatha
Huntington
Hinckley Manti
50
28
89
57
29
Sterling
137
50 100
§ ¦ ¨
Kanosh
§ ¦ ¨ 70
Green River
E M E R Y
G R A N D
19
§ ¦ ¨
Crescent Jct.
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
Richfield
128
119 118
161
24
Monroe
70
Milford
24
Marysvale
PIUTE
11433
Moab
72
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
6 !
Emery
SE VI ER
15
21
10
260
118
Cleveland
Ferron
Salina
99
257
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
124 155
Clawson
Holden
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Choke Point
159
123
Region 4
U I N T A H
Castle Dale
Gunnison
50
Wellington
122
Ephraim
136
CARBON
157
Price
31
117
125 Delta
116
Helper
264
Fairview
191
13408
96
89
Nephi
313
25
279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell
Beaver Minersville
62
153
24
22
89
Antimony
130
12576
Parowan
13409
11532 Cedar City
143
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
Hurricane
7
211
Monticello
276
491
Escalante
12
12 63
14363 9
191
95
Blanding
Tropic
S A N 276
262
261
Glendale
K A N E
9
162
89 59
J U A N 95
89 17
12844
95
14
WA S HI N G TO N
St. George
46
Panguitch
Enterprise
219
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
W A Y N E
21
20
56
Torrey
Junction
162
316 191
Kanab
14364
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
High Volume Roads (HVR) Program FUNDING
The HVR Program supports a prescriptive and cost-effective resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation strategy that restores structure, prolongs the service life, and enhances the safety of existing roadways.
Programmed funding: 2016: $148.00 million Federal $12.00 million State $160.00 million total Proposed funding: 2017: $159.35 million Federal $.65 million State $160.00 total 2018: $188.05 million Federal $1.95 million State $190.00 total 2019: $186.85 million Federal $3.15 million State $190.00 total
The HVR Program is a combination of he historical Preservation, Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation programs for the Interstate system and other high volume roads. Identified projects must follow the appropriate Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation design processes.
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
CONTACT
UDOT’s Central Asset Management Division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for each region. Each region then considers its needs and prepares a list of preservation and rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. Federal funding provides the majority of the funding for these projects Project list and funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for approval at the March or April commission meeting.
Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
High Volume Pavement Condition (4,015 Mi/ 19,080 SA) 100% 90% 80%
ACCOMPLISHMENTS % of Miles
High volume roads carry more than one thousand vehicles or 200 trucks per day. In in 2015 UDOT completed 1,610 lane miles of work on HVR.
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Poor: IRI > 170 in/mi
7
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
5
Fair: IRI 95 to 170 in/mi
40
35
35
36
37
36
34
35
33
35
Good: IRI < 95 in/mi
54
59
59
58
57
58
60
60
61
60
Long Range Goal: < 10 % Poor
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
Long Range Goal: > 50 % Good
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Ride quality is evaluated using the International Roughness Index, the standard for measuring ride quality on a generic vehicle. IRI calculations reflect relative comfort of the riding surface based on longitudinal road profile and vehicle speed.
PIN: 88073, 8074, 10031, 11731
Page 56
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Low Volume Roads (LVR) Program State year: July 1 Programmed funding: 2016: $17.4 million 2017 proposed: $40 million 2018 proposed: $40 million 2019 proposed: $40 million
CONTACT
Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Low volume roads carry fewer than one thousand vehicles per day. In 2015, UDOT completed 725 lane miles of work on LVR.
The LVR Program supports a prescriptive and cost-effective resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation strategy that restores structure, prolongs the service life, and enhances the safety of existing roadways. The LVR Program is a combination of our historical Preservation, Rehabilitation and Major Rehabilitation programs for the Low Volume roads. The identified The LVR Program is a combination of our historical Preservation, Rehabilitation & Major Rehabilitation projects must follow the appropriate Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation and programs for the Low Volume roads. The identified projects will still need to follow the appropriate Major Rehabilitation design process. Preservation, Minor Rehabilitation & Major Rehabilitation design process.
UDOT’s Central Asset Management division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project UDOT’s Central Asset Management division analyzes UDOT’s roadway network each year to determine recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for the funding needs to maintain the condition. Project recommendations and allocations of the available funding are then provided for each region. Each region then considers their region needs and prepares each region. a list of preservation and rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. State funds from the new gas tax will be providing all of the funding for these projects. For the past few years UDOT Each region then considers its needs and prepares a list of preservation and had a very limited amount of projects for these roads, and most of the surfacing work was being rehabilitation projects to include in the annual STIP workshop. Project list and performed with UDOT crews.
funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for approval at the March or April commission meeting.
Project list and funding amounts are presented to the Utah transportation Commission for approval at
the March or April commission meeting. State funds from the new gas tax provide all of the funding for LVR projects. For the past few years UDOT had a very limited amount of projects for these roads, Accomplishments: in 2015 UDOT completed 725 surface areas of work on the LVR and most of the surfacing work was being performed with UDOT crews. And here’s an updated chart extended to 2020
Low Volume Pavement Condition (1,865 Mi/ 4,410 SA) 100% 90% 80% 70%
% of Miles
FUNDING
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Poor: IRI > 170 in/mi
20
21
23
25
27
28
27
26
23
22
Fair: IRI 95 to 170 in/mi
59
58
57
57
57
53
50
47
47
46
Good: IRI < 95 in/mi
21
21
20
18
16
19
23
27
30
32
Long Range Goal: < 20 % Poor
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
Long Range Goal: > 30 % Good
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Ride quality is evaluated using the International Roughness Index, the standard for measuring ride quality on a generic vehicle. IRI calculations reflect relative comfort of the riding surface based on longitudinal road profile and vehicle speed.
PIN: 5927, 5928, 5929, 5936, 6632, 8071, 8072, 10032
Page 57
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 61
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 64
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 65
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
§ ¦ ¨ 84
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
Region 1
Garden City
218
15
89 30
83
38
30
Logan
13468
C A C H E
30
Randolph
23
102 240
12287
13
B O X
R I C H
101
89 !
E L D E R
13733
Brigham City
39
Woodruff
16
89
39 158
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
13471
Ogden
13469
222
13470 167
D AV I S
12284
M O R G A N
12279 13466
Morgan
12283
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
13467
66
T O O E L E
13472 67
S A L T
Wendover
Coalville
S U M M I T
Bountiful
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation
Pavement High Volume Roads
81
C A C H E R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
M O R G A N D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T
12496 Salt Lake City
Wendover
11501
§ ¦ ¨
65 150
13753
80
1
201
SALT LAKE
138 Grantsville
36 112
T O O E L E
Tooele
9447
2 3
1- 13521 2- 12498 3- 13458
224
40
9713
32 Kamas
Park City
150
11185
35
Draper
13150
Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Helper
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation
Pavement High Volume Roads
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
S A LT LA K E
Grantsville
44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
Heber City
144
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Lehi
73
12196
92
146
13648
10218
89
13647
121 Tabiona
Roosevelt
10220
Eureka
40
Myton Duchesne
88 45
13621
198
40 !
12316
6 ! 36
40 !
87
13622
149
208
68 141
Naples
Springville
77
12314
Vernal
35
WASATCH
13645
12312Provo 12246
UTAH
Vernon
92
12162
11345
113
6
U I N T A H
191 89
10217
Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
Helper
132
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
S A N P E T E
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
Delta
C A R B O N
Scofield
132
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/7/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation
Pavement High Volume Roads
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
191
T O O E L E
U T A H
Eureka Mona
174
Fairview
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
Delta
116
11531
12470
89
29
Manti
28
159
M I L L A R D
§ ¦ ¨ 161
260
99
257
Richfield
13356 11527
GRAND
124 155 Cleveland
6 !
13329
Castle Dale
§ ¦ ¨ 70
Ferron
E M E R Y
Green River
19 Crescent Jct.
Emery
§ ¦ ¨
§ ¦ ¨ 70
163 !
128
12471
14277
118
24
24
Monroe
Marysvale
123
12477
Moab
72
70
Milford
13328
Salina
119
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
Sunnyside
14285
11528
Mayfield
SE VI ER
Kanosh
57
256
Fillmore
13360
21
137
50 100
Huntington
Clawson
Holden
12475
122
Sterling
Gunnison
50
Wellington
PIUTE
Region 4
U I N T A H
Pavement High Volume Roads
13331
50
31 Hiawatha
Ephraim
157 Price
117
136
Hinckley
Helper
264
132
125
CARBON
Scofield
Levan
132
191
96
89
Nephi
J U A B
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
6
25
14301
279 Loa
W A Y N E
Hanksville
Bicknell Beaver
62
153
Torrey
21
14310
Minersville
22
89
20
Antimony
130
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
56
46 24
Junction
Parowan
95 211
276
Monticello
13340
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
13330
7
S A N 276
9
9
14283
262
261
K A N E
13376
162
89 59
J U A N 95
Glendale
Hurricane
13332
Blanding
Tropic
89 17
191
95
14
WA S H I N G TO N
St. George
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Pavement Preservation
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
§ ¦ ¨ 84
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
218
15
89
81
38
30
C A C H E
23
102
30
Logan
Randolph
13861
240
R I C H
165
13
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
39 158
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
Ogden
222
167
SUMMIT
M O R G A N Morgan
D A V I S
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
66 Coalville Bountiful
T O O E L E
67
65
SALT LAKE Wendover
Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program
Pavement Low Volume Roads
30
83
B O X
Region 1
Garden City
C A C H E R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
M O R G A N D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T Salt Lake City
Wendover
65 150
§ ¦ ¨ 80
201
S A L T
138
224
L A K E
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
Grantsville
150
36 112
T O O E L E
35
Tooele
Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
11509 Vernon
11510
11508 Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
Helper
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program
Pavement Low Volume Roads
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T
S A LT LA K E
Grantsville
44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
144
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
113
92 Lehi
92
146
73
Heber City
Vernal
35
WASATCH
Naples
121 Tabiona
U T A H
189 208
Myton Duchesne
Springville
77
40 !
141
88 45
68
U I N T A H
198 6 !
Eureka
40
40
89
36
40 !
87 Roosevelt
Provo
Vernon
149
13859
6
6 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
Scofield
Helper
132
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
S A N P E T E
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
Delta
C A R B O N
132
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program
Pavement Low Volume Roads
Salt Lake City
Wendover
191
T O O E L E
U T A H
Eureka Mona
132
174
Huntington Manti
50
28
89
57
29
159
Sterling
137
50 100
260
99
257
Kanosh
Salina
19 Crescent Jct.
Emery
§ ¦ ¨
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
24
Monroe
70
Marysvale
PIUTE
279 Loa
W A Y N E
62
153
Torrey
Hanksville
13781
46
SAN JUAN
Junction
21 22
89
Moab
313
25
Bicknell
20
128
24 72
§ ¦ ¨
Milford
Minersville
Green River
13782
118
Beaver
E M E R Y
119
161
B E A V E R
70
Richfield
15
21
§ ¦ ¨
Ferron
10
SE VI ER
118
§ ¦ ¨
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
6 !
Clawson
Holden
M I L L A R D
Cleveland
Castle Dale
Gunnison
50
GRAND
124 155
Pavement Low Volume Roads
Hinckley
123
122
14316
Ephraim
136
Sunnyside
Wellington Hiawatha
117
125 Delta
31
Region 4
U I N T A H
157 Price
Mount Pleasant
116
Helper
264
Fairview
Moroni
CARBON
Scofield
Levan
132
191
96
89
Nephi
J U A B
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
6
95
Antimony
211
130
I R O N
56
G A R F I E L D
Parowan
Boulder
Panguitch
14318 Cedar City
143
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
63
17
276
9
9
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
Blanding
13779
95
Glendale
7
Tropic
89
Hurricane
191
95
14
WA S H I N G TO N
St. George
491
14318
12
Enterprise
219
Escalante
Monticello
276
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/12/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 Level Two Pavement Rehabilitation 2017 Level Two Pavement Preservation 2017 Level Two Asset Management Program
C A C H E R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T SALT LAKE
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨ 80
201
Salt Lake City
65 150
9419
224
138
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
Grantsville
150
36 112
T O O E L E
35
Tooele
Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
Helper
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I 0
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
200 Miles
Project Year 2017
Pavement Major Rehab. Program
M O R G A N
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 75
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
Federal and Combined Funds
Bridge Replacement, Rehabilitation & Preservation The Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program uses state and federal funding to replace, rehabilitate, and inspect bridges.
Programmed funding 2016 $26.5 Million Proposed funding: 2017 $40.0 Million 2018 $48.0 Million 2019 $48.0 Million 2020 $48.0 Million
CONTACT
Rebecca Nix 801-633-2810 RNix@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Fiscal Year 2015 funds were used for replacing the Clarion Road Local Government Structure in Centerville, and continued funding for replacing six structurally deficient structures on the South Davis Corridor project. This program will continue to fund the bridge inspection program. Upon approval of the FY 2020 program, all state owned bridges currently classified as structurally deficient will be programmed for rehabilitation or replacement.
The South Davis Improvement Project replaced aging bridges at 2600 South, 1500 South, 500 South, and 400 North in Bountiful.
This program funds the systematic replacement, rehabilitation or preservation of existing bridges to address deficiencies due to aging and deterioration. The load rating and inspection programs, which are also funded through this program, ensure that bridges are in adequate condition to accommodate anticipated traffic needs. Bridges are ranked based on deficiencies observed during biannual bridge inspections. Projects are ranked based on bridge condition, load rating, AADT, significance, and delay factors. Region requests, Region projects and local government requests are also considered when selecting projects. This program funds the replacement, rehabilitation and preservation of all state owned bridges as well as local bridges on the federal aid system.
â&#x20AC;&#x192;
Fund CodeS: ST_BRIDGE, NHPP_BR, STP_BRIDGE
Page 76
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 77
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 78
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 79
42
Snowville
30
200
61
13518
Trenton
142
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
218
15
89
81
30
83
38
30
Randolph
240
13524
R I C H
101
165
13
B O X
C A C H E
23
102
30
Logan
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
39 158
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
Ogden
222
167
M O R G A N Morgan
12415
D A V I S
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
66
13793
T O O E L E
12416
Coalville Bountiful
67
Wendover
S A L T
S U M M I T
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Bridge Preservation Program
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Region 1
Garden City
C A C H E R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T
12418
12418
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨
65 150
14345
80
12442
201 138 36 112
Tooele
12443
14347
S A L T
Grantsville
T O O E L E
Salt Lake City
224
14344
L A K E
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
14346
150 35
Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
Helper
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Bridge Preservation Program
M O R G A N
WEBER B O X
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
RICH
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
Bountiful
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
S A LT L A K E
Grantsville
191 44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
Draper
Heber City
14411
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
92 Lehi
92
146
73
Vernal
35
WASATCH
Naples
121 Tabiona
U T A H
189 208
Myton Duchesne
Springville
77
40 !
141
88 45
68
U I N T A H
198 6 !
Eureka
40
40
89
6
6
36
12609
Roosevelt
Provo
Vernon
40 !
87
149
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
SANPETE
132
132
C A R B O N Helper
Fairview
13159 Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
E M E R Y
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Delta
Scofield
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
M I L L A R D
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Bridge Preservation Program
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville
T O O E L E
U T A H
Eureka Mona
132
Mount Pleasant
174
Price
Manti
50
28
89
57
29
159
Sterling
137
50 100
99
257
13805
260
Salina
Richfield
118
Milford
Crescent Jct.
70
163 !
24
Monroe
Marysvale
PIUTE
128
24 Moab
72
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
21
13804
19
§ ¦ ¨
SEVIER
119
Green River
Emery
70
15
161
E M E R Y
§ ¦ ¨
Kanosh
70
Ferron
10
118
§ ¦ ¨
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
§ ¦ ¨
Clawson
Holden
M I L L A R D
6 !
Castle Dale
Gunnison
50
GRAND
124 155 Cleveland
Bridge Preservation Program
Huntington
Hinckley
123
122
Ephraim
136
Sunnyside
Wellington Hiawatha
Region 4
U I N T A H
157
31
117
125 Delta
116
Helper
264
Fairview
Moroni
CARBON
Scofield
Levan
132
191
96
89
Nephi
J U A B
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
6
313
25
14178
279 Loa
W A Y N E
12603
Hanksville
Bicknell Beaver Minersville
62
153
22
89
Antimony
130
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
46 24
21
20
56
Torrey
Junction
Parowan
95 211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
S A N
Hurricane
9
9
276
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
J U A N 95
Glendale
7
Blanding
Tropic
12439
17
191
95
14
WA S H I N G TO N
St. George
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
§ ¦ ¨ 84
142 91
23 218
15
89
81
30
83
12389 30
38
30
C A C H E Randolph
23
102
11476
240
R I C H
101
165
13
B O X
Logan
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
39 158
12446
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
Ogden
14263
222
167
14264
SUMMIT
M O R G A N
14348
Morgan
D A V I S
12624
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
66 Coalville Bountiful
T O O E L E
67
65
SALT LAKE Wendover
Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
§ ¦ ¨
Region 1
Garden City
C A C H E
R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
13324
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
11419
13323
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨ 80
13794
201
2 1
138 36 112
Tooele
S U M M I T
65
13796
9419
224
14398
Grantsville
T O O E L E
1- 13800 2- 14355
Salt Lake City
12445
150
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
S A L T
L A K E
150 35
Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
Helper
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
M O R G A N
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
S A LT LA K E
Grantsville
44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
144
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
113
92 Lehi
92
146
73
U T A H
12444
Heber City
Vernal
35
Naples
WASATCH
121 Tabiona
Roosevelt
208
77
12390
Springville 11475
Myton Duchesne
40 !
141
U I N T A H
198 6 !
Eureka
88 45
68
36
40
40 Provo
Vernon
40 !
87
189
149
6
6
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
Scofield
C A R B O N
132
Helper
132
Fairview
13799
Price Levan
78
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
S A N P E T E
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
Delta
Wellington
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
191
Eureka
U T A H
Mona
132
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
116
Helper
264
Fairview
13799
31
Hiawatha
50
28
89
57
29
159
Sterling
257
70
Green River
E M E R Y
G R A N D
19
§ ¦ ¨
Crescent Jct.
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
Richfield
128
119
15
118
24
Monroe
70
Milford
24 Moab
72
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
§ ¦ ¨
Emery
SE VI ER
161
21
10
260
Kanosh
6 !
Ferron
Salina
118
§ ¦ ¨
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
99
14354
137
50 100
Cleveland
Clawson
Holden
M I L L A R D
124 155
Castle Dale
Gunnison
50
123
Marysvale
PIUTE
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
Huntington Manti
Sunnyside
Wellington
122
Ephraim
Hinckley
Region 4
U I N T A H
157 Price
117
136
CARBON
Scofield
132
125 Delta
191
96
Levan
174
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
89
Nephi
J U A B
6
313
25
279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell
Beaver Minersville
62
153
24
22
89
Antimony
130
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
W A Y N E
46
21
20
56
Torrey
Junction
Parowan
95 211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
Blanding
12448
S A N 276
89 17
Hurricane
9
9
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
J U A N 95
Glendale
7
Tropic
191
95
13797
14
WA S HI N G TO N
St. George
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/6/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019 2020
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Highway Safety Improvement Program FUNDING Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $23.5 million 2017 proposed: $24.4 million 2018 proposed: $24.8 million 2019 proposed: $25.3 million
CONTACT W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov
The federally-funded Highway Safety Improvement Program supports infrastructure and non-infrastructure efforts that have the potential to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Projects may be on any public roadway at a location, show a positive estimated benefit to cost ratio, and conform to the State Strategic Highway Safety Plan. UDOT collaborates with FHWA to select and oversee projects. Infrastructure projects typically include: • Installing features (barrier, rumble strips, warning signs, and pavement markings) that prevent or mitigate run-off-road crashes • Removing or protecting roadside obstructions • Upgrading traffic signals to protected left turn phasing or flashing yellow arrows to remove conflict points • Widening intersections to add turn lanes Non-infrastructure projects include: • Education efforts, such as the Zero Fatalities campaign, that address unsafe driving behaviors • Program management • Crash database development • Crash prediction models and other studies that identify future infrastructure project locations
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Every life lost due to traffic deaths continues to affect us all. Educating drivers to avoid dangerous driving behaviors and implementing measures to improve safety can help bring us closer to our goal of Zero Fatalities.
While overall traffic fatalities are down since 2000, that number has increased in the last three years.
PIN: 6019 Fund Code: HSIP
Page 88
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 89
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 90
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 91
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
84
Region 1
Garden City
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
C A C H E
218
15
89
81
30
83
38
14449
Logan
30
12614 Randolph
23
102
30
240
B O X
R I C H
101
165
13
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39
89
16
13486 39 158
14454
§ ¦ ¨ 15
W E B E R Huntsville
Ogden
222
MORGAN 13488 14452 Morgan
D A V I S T O O E L E
84
Farmington
66
Coalville
14453
Bountiful
67
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨
S A L T
S U M M I T
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program
§ ¦ ¨
14451
C A C H E
R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville
1- 14670 2- 14456 14455
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨ 80
138
S U M M I T Salt Lake City
14460 14457 14459
14458
Bountiful
2
65
1
T O O E L E
Tooele
14461
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
150
14664
36 112
224
13308
13597
Grantsville
150
S A L T L A K E
35 Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
CARBON Scofield
Nephi
S A N P E T E Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
Helper
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program
M O R G A N
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
Bountiful
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
S A LT LA K E
Grantsville
Kamas
222 144
§ ¦ ¨ 15
113
Heber City
13490 14563
Vernal
35
WASATCH
92
146
73
Naples
121
13601
14463
Tabiona
189
11394
2
Springville
77
Eureka
40
Myton
UTAH
Duchesne
40 !
88 45
U I N T A H
198 6 !
36
14464
208
68 141
149
40 !
87 Roosevelt
1- 14462 2- 14109
Provo
89 Vernon
1
92 Lehi
191
40 !
Draper
T O O E L E
44
DUCHESNE
Park City
32 Tooele
191
6
6
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
Scofield
Helper
132
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
S A N P E T E
M I L L A R D
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
Delta
C A R B O N
132
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville
Eureka Mona
Mount Pleasant
132
116
Moroni
136
Hiawatha
Manti
50
28
89
57
29
Holden
118 Kanosh
§ ¦ ¨ 15
§ ¦ ¨
13492 14447 14448 14426
B E AV E R
119 24
E M E R Y
§ ¦ ¨ 70
Green River
14443
G R A N D
19
Crescent Jct.
163 !
70
Marysvale
PIUTE
14425
24 72
§ ¦ ¨
Milford
6 !
70
SEVIER
Richfield
Monroe
13447
Cleveland
§ ¦ ¨
70
14446
13237
21
Emery
260
118 161
10
Salina
99
155
Ferron
256
Fillmore
257
Mayfield
137
50 100
Sunnyside
Clawson
Gunnison
M I L L A R D
123
124
Castle Dale
Sterling
Wellington
Region 4
U I N T A H
157
122
Huntington
13501
CARBON Price
31
14424
Ephraim
Hinckley
159
Helper
HSIP- Highway Safety Improvement Program
117
125
50
13494
264
Fairview
Levan
Delta
96
Scofield
132
174
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
89
Nephi
J U A B
6
U T A H
Moab
313
25
279
14445
Loa Hanksville Bicknell
14423
Beaver
21 Minersville
I R O N
Torrey
24
Junction
W A Y N E
SAN JUAN
13491 22
89
20
G A R F I E L D
Antimony
13040
130
14444
Parowan
56
153
62
Boulder
211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch
14427
13493
Escalante
191
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨
WA S HI N G TO N 17 Hurricane St. George
7
13495
Blanding
276
89 Glendale
13448
Tropic
14
15
18
46
9
9
K A N E
162
89 59
262
261
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Signal Maintenance & Operations FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2015: $5 million 2016: $3 million 2017 proposed: $ 3 million 2018 proposed: $ 3 million
The Traffic Signal Maintenance and Operations Program optimizes mobility, improves safety and strengthens the economy by improving traffic flow, reducing stops, increasing the visibility of traffic signals, and optimizing traffic signal timing for special events and businesses.
CONTACT
Mark Taylor 801 887-3714 marktaylor@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT is moving toward world-class traffic signal management with the following results: Over 50% of UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s traffic signals are configured with radar detection that picks up cyclists waiting at the red light. Real time management of traffic signal operations deployed at most intersections. Traffic Signal Event Management improves delay. BYU game-day delays are reduced from 120 to 70 minutes per vehicle. Reflectorized traffic signal backplates have been installed at many intersections. Research shows the backplates improve visibility and reduce crashes by 15 percent.
Downtown Salt Lake City
Recent initiatives: Traffic Signal Event Management - UDOT has reduced delay during events by working with local venues and deploying signal timing plans to handle changes in travel demand. Reflectorized Traffic Signal Backplates - Transparent yellow tape is now placed around traffic signal backplates to help increase signal transparency. Increased Proactive Maintenance - Potential problems are addressed before road users experience inconvenience. Real-Time Traffic Signal Operations Management - Volumes, speeds, and other metrics are collected and signals are adjusted in real-time. UDOT is one of just a few agencies nation-wide using these tools, and recently and recently received the AASHTO Innovation Initiative award, Institute of Transportation Engineers Utah Chapter project of the year, 2014 Governorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Award of Excellence for innovation and efficiency. In addition, UDOT has shared the technology with other states, including Kansas, Minnesota, Nevada, Florida, Georgia, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
ePM Master PIN: 10948 Funding Code: ST_SIGNL_ M&O
Page 96
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Traffic Management FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $3 million 2017 proposed: $3 million 2018 proposed: $ 3 million 2019 proposed: $ 3 million
CONTACT
Blaine Leonard, P.E. 801 887-3723 bleonard@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Improved the UDOT Traffic website and smart phone app
The Traffic Management Program uses state and federal funding to improve UDOT’s ability to collect and disseminate traffic information focused on optimizing mobility. The program provides for expansion of UDOT’s fiber optic communication network, software, and devices, like cameras, overhead signs and traffic sensors, that allow UDOT to: • Continually manage the traffic signal network to help traffic flow more smoothly • Provide road users with information about traffic incidents, weather, construction delay, and travel times • Monitor traffic and quickly respond to mitigate the effects of crashes and disruptions. • Help maintenance crews anticipate weather and clear snow efficiently • Manage Express Lanes to keep all lanes operating at optimal levels • Support Utah Highway Patrol efforts to clear incidents quickly • Adjust freeway ramp meters to smooth out traffic flow
Connected numerous signals in Salt Lake, Davis, Weber and Duchesne counties to the central control system Developed tools to measure the freeway performance and identify causes of delay Extended fiber along Logan Main Street and added ten traffic cameras. Upgraded fiber capacity along I-15 in northern Utah County Extended high-speed fiber to three UDOT maintenance sheds in Utah County to provide better system access Collaborated with a Utah company to extend fiber along US-6 from I-15 to I-70 and connect to UDOT devices.
Road Weather Information Stations (RWIS) around the state gather real-time weather data on wind, precipitation, temperature, and road temperature. Meteorologists then predict impacts on travel, provide information to help maintenance crews take precautions against road ice and plan plowing operations, and provide travel information to the public. In 2015, Traffic Management expanded the network of RWIS around the state.
ePM Master PIN: 5954 Fund Code: ST_ATMS
Page 97
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
ATMS Asset Management FUNDING
UDOT’s new complete lifecycle approach to ATMS asset management will increase system reliability and reduce overall maintenance costs through orderly disposition of devices at end-of-life.
Programmed funding 2017 proposed: $3.9 million 2018 proposed: $3.9 million 2019 proposed: $3.9 million
The Automated Traffic Management System (ATMS) unites traffic monitoring stations, road weather information stations, traffic cameras, and other system components, with a power and communications backbone that allows UDOT to manage traffic in real time. A high-functioning ATMS system is central to optimizing mobility, and elements of ATMS significantly reduce fatalities and injuries.
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
CONTACT
John Haigwood 801 887-3768 jhaigwood@utah.gov
This program is new for FY 2017. UDOT Engineers have studied the needs of the ATMS program to implement a data centric life cycle approach to asset management. Variable Message Signs (VMS) communicate travel information in real-time.
communulative devices
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ATMS Growth
UDOT ATMS has experienced tremendous growth since the Traffic Operations Center opened in 1999. The system now includes over 2000 devices, not including supporting electronics. Without a plan to replace these devices, the system would become increasingly unreliable and costly to maintain.
At end-of-life, ATMS devices are typically unreliable or broken. Systematic device replacement is a holistic approach that conserves funding and supports the functionality of the entire transportation system.
Statewide research shows Utah drivers consider VMS information to be their top resource for information on expected expected travel times, upcoming construction, lane closures, crashes blocking their route or information ahead of a large weather event.
Program activities include: • Replacing unreliable or non-functioning ATMS devices past end of life • Replacing ATMS devices that will reach end-of-life in current and future fiscal years before normal traffic flow is interrupted • Upgrading supporting equipment and electronics such as communication hub switches, power transformers and the communications backbone • Replacing broken communication junction boxes
ePM Master PIN: 0000 Funding Code: FUNDING
Page 98
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Barrier Treatments FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $300 thousand Proposed: 2017: $300 thousand 2018: $300 thousand 2019: $300 thousand
CONTACT
Robert Miles robertmiles@utah.gov 801 965-4273
The state-funded Barrier Treatments program is used to identify and replace substandard barrier and barrier end treatments on state and federal highway systems. The Program is a partnership between the UDOT Traffic and Safety Division, FHWA, UDOT region offices, and fulfills a memorandum of understanding between UDOT and FHWA. Replacing substandard barrier furthers UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ZERO Fatalities strategic goal. UDOT Region offices identify, screen and prioritize potential project locations. Projects are evaluated using a five-step process that includes planning, analyzing prioritizing, programming and implementing. Region offices oversee project delivery.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Hundreds of locations on interstate highways have been improved during the past 5 years. In 2014, UDOT Region Three installed 2.25 miles of new guardrail along steep drop-offs in Indian Canyon on US-191 between Helper and Duchesne. In 2015, UDOT Region Four installed structure protection on I-15 and I-70, barrier and guardrail on SR-14, and guardrail on US-163
Replacing sub-standard barrier and barrier end treatments improves highway safety. This photo shows a new standard end-treatment that replaced outdated Texas turndown barrier.
ePM Master PIN: 6061 Fund Code: ST_BARRIER
Page 99
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Small Area Lighting FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The Small-Area Lighting Improvement Program allows UDOT to partner with municipal officials to promote community safety and visibility at a specific location or along a state highway corridor.
Programmed funding 2016: $300 thousand 2017 proposed: $300 thousand 2018 proposed: $300 thousand 2019 proposed: $300 thousand
Program goals include: • Decreasing crash potential and severity • Improving nighttime safety and visibility • Improving energy efficiency • Replacing outdated lighting infrastructure
CONTACT
UDOT and community representatives work together to formulate a plan to address a lighting need. The community or municipality is usually required to provide some funding and work.
W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Funding may be also be applied to a plan already in place or used to supplement a community-driven project. The cost to maintain and power the installation is turned over to the municipality at project completion.
SR-163 , Monument Valley lighting US-191 Moab Bridge apporoach lightning SR-58, Wendover Boulevard Lighting US-89, Springville Mainstreet lighting improvements
UDOT updated the lighting for truck parking at the Lunt Park Safety Rest Area on I-15 near Parowan, Utah. Safe, adequate truck parking areas are important to commerce since truck operators need to take regular rest breaks. This photo used courtesy AARoads.com (Andy Field, Alex Nitzman).
ePM Master PIN: 6129 Funding Code: ST_LIGHTING
Page 100
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 101
FY 2017 - Small-Area Lighting Projects Reg 1 2 3 4 4 4 B B B B B B B
County BOX ELDER TOOELE UTAH IRON EMERY EMERY STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE
Route 0082P 0036P 0077P 0130P 0019P 0019P
BMP EMP 0.85 0.85 40.9 40.9 7.4 7.4 1.35 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.2 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PIN 14704 14706 14711 14700 14708 14710 14709 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717
Project Location SR-82; MP .85 - .85 SR-36; MP 40.90 - 40.90 SR-77; MP 7.40 - 7.40 SR-130; MP 1.35 - 1.70 SR-19; MP 1.50 - 1.80 SR-19; MP 1.20 - 1.50 Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project Statewide project
PIN Description SR-82, Garland (Bear River HS Lighting) SR-36 @ RR Crossing southwest of Stockton SR-77, Springville Intersection Lighting SR-130, Cedar City Main St Lighting SR-19, Green River Lighting Phase 2 SR-19, Green River Lighting Phase 3 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY17 Intersection Safety Improvements FY18 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY18 Funds transfers for lighting on FY18 projects Intersection Safety Improvements FY19 LED Lighting Energy & Safety Improvements FY19 Funds transfers for lighting on FY19 projects
PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Project Value Planned Year $ 30,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 50,000 2018 $ 75,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2018 $ 125,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 50,000 2018 $ 50,000 2018 $ 150,000 2019 $ 50,000 2019 $ 100,000 2019
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 103
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Sign Modification & Replacement FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
State funding allows UDOT Traffic and Safety to identify and replace freeway signs that have deteriorated or become outdated.
Programmed funding 2016: $400 thousand 2017 proposed: $400 thousand 2018 proposed: $400 thousand 2018 proposed: $400 thousand
CONTACT
Michael Donivan 801 965-4376 mdonivan@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT Traffic and Safety placed 41 new signs in 2014, including: 10 signs for state parks 6 memorial signs Freeway signs at I-15 exits 167, 174, 111, and 113 75 70 mph speed limit signs The Utah Sign Manual and the Utah Standard Highway Signs Supplement are located on the UDOT FTP site.
Freeway signs provide important directional guidance to drivers.
Signs that are outdated, worn, or damaged are less effective at providing information and may even cause confusion. UDOT replaces groups of signs or individual signs when: • A message becomes outdated or incorrect • The daytime or nighttime visibility is lost • A project can be completed using overlay of existing signs, offering a high benefit at a reasonably low cost Each year, region traffic engineers provide a list of potential projects, and UDOT Traffic and Safety and UDOT Regions prioritize projects. Requests by communities affected by UDOT projects are considered. Signs that will be replaced by a project within three years are not considered.
ePM Master PIN: 6364 Funding Code: ST_SIGNING
Page 104
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 105
FY 2017 - State Signing Reg 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4
County BOX ELDER BOX ELDER BOX ELDER TOOELE TOOELE TOOELE IRON MILLARD SEVIER
Route 0084N 0084N 0015P 0080N 0080P 0080N 0015P 0015P 0070P
BMP 33.3 32.414 363.75 88.65 83.17 76.42 75 138.09 73.936
EMP 33.3 32.4 364 88.7 83.2 76.4 75 138 73.9
PIN 14686 14697 14703 14693 14699 14705 14694 14701 14707
Project Location I-84; MP 31.70 - 31.70 & I-84; MP 33.30 - 33.30 I-84; MP 32.41 - 32.41 I-15; MP 363.75 - 363.75 & I-15; MP 365.54 - 365.54 I-80; MP 88.65 - 88.65 & I-80; MP 87.40 - 87.40 I-80; MP 83.17 - 83.17 & I-80; MP 84.40 - 84.40 I-80; MP 76.42 - 76.42 I-15; MP 75.00 - 75.00 & I-15; MP 78.00 - 78.00 I-15; MP 138.09 - 138.09 I-70; MP 73.94 - 73.94
PIN Description I-84; Exit 32, Ranch Exit Interchange I-84; Exit 32 Direction/Gore Signs I-15; Exits 363 & 365 I-80; Exit 88 I-80; Exit 84 I-80; Exit 77 I-15; Exits 75 & 78 I-15; Exit 138 I-70; Exit 73
PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Project Value Planned Year $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019 $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019 $ 100,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 100,000 2019
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 107
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Spot Safety Improvements FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The Spot Safety Improvement Program funds infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects that are expected to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries.
Programmed funding 2016: $2 million 2017 proposed: $2 million 2018 proposed: $2 million 2019 proposed: $2 million
CONTACT
W. Scott Jones, P.E. 801 965-4285 wsjones@utah.gov
Enhanced crosswalk, 300 W between South Temple and North Temple, Salt Lake City
SSIP Funding comes entirely from the State of Utah and helps UDOT achieve the ZERO Fatalities Strategic Goal. Projects are selected annually using a fivestep process that includes planning, analyzing, prioritizing, programming, and implementing. Funding for infrastructure projects may only be applied on the state highway system.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Every life lost due to traffic deaths continues to affect us all. Educating drivers to avoid dangerous driving behaviors and implementing measures to improve safety can help bring us closer to our goal of Zero Fatalities.
While overall traffic fatalities are down since 2000, that number has increased in the last three years ePM Master PIN: 5775 Fund Code: ST_SPOT_SFTY
Page 108
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 109
OPERATIONS AND SAFETY - SSIP Reg 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 B B B B B B
County WEBER CACHE WEBER DAVIS VARIOUS SUMMIT SALT LAKE SALT LAKE VARIOUS UTAH VARIOUS MILLARD MILLARD IRON KANE PIUTE PIUTE VARIOUS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE
Route 0134P 0101P 0204P 0089P 0150P 0150P 0154P 0085P 0089P 0040N 0015N 0006P 0020P 0014P 0062P 0062P
BMP 10.85 2.9 4.6 387.6 1 16 10.35 13.6 0 347.7 6.1 134.5 105.3 3 30.08 5.4 5.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EMP 10.85 3 4.6 387.6 54.74 25 10.35 13.85 0 347.8 12.85 139.5 107.5 7 31 5.6 5.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PIN 14480 14481 14482 14483 13497 14484 14485 14486 14487 13061 14488 14489 14490 14491 14492 14493 14494 14495 14496 14498 14499 14500 14501 14502
Project Location SR-134; MP 10.85 - 10.85 SR-101; MP 2.90 - 3.00 SR-204; MP 4.60 - 4.60 US-89; MP 387.55 - 387.55 SR-150; MP 1.00 - 54.74 SR-150; MP 16.00 - 25.00 SR-154; MP 10.35 - 10.35 SR-85; MP 13.60 - 13.85 specific project locations TBD US-89; MP 347.75 - 347.83 US-189; MP 8.66 - 14.59 & US-40; MP 6.10 - 12.85 & US-40; MP 6.10 - 12.85 I-15; MP 134.50 - 139.50 & I-15; MP 134.50 - 139.50 US-6; MP 105.28 - 107.51 SR-20; MP 3.00 - 7.00 SR-14; MP 30.08 - 31.00 SR-62; MP 5.40 - 5.60 SR-62; MP 5.40 - 5.60 specific locations TBD statewide studies statewide effort statewide study statewide studies statewide studies statewide studies
PIN Description SR-134; MP 10.85, Guardrail & Crash Cushion SR-101; MP 2.9-3.0, Curb, Gutter, & Shoulder Imps SR-204; MP 4.6, Construct Right Turn Lane US-89; MP 387.55, Construct Right Turn Lane SR-150; MP 1-55, Replace Signs SR-150; MP 16-25, Repair Shoulder Drop-Offs SR-154; MP 10.35, Crash Cushion SR-85; MP 13.6-13.85, Install Guardrail Spot Safety Improvement Projects FY18 US-89 at Main St/200 E, American Fork US-189 & US-40 Grooved-In Pavement Lines I-15; MP 134.5-139.5, Drowsy Driving Signs US-6; MP 105.28-107.51, Shoulder Improvements SR-20; MP 3-7, Shoulder Improvements SR-14; MP 30.08-31.00, Cable Barrier SR-62; MP 5.4-5.6, Sign Upgrades SR-62; MP 5.4-5.6, Shoulder & Clear Zone Imps Spot Safety Improvement Projects FY18 Interstate Speed Studies FY17 Safety Campaigns, Education, & Enforcement FY17 SHRP2 State Match Pooled Fund Study State Match FY17 Interstate Speed Studies FY18 Pooled Fund Studies State Match FY18
PIN Status Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Active Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Active Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Project Value Planned Year $ 61,000 2017 $ 150,000 2017 $ 100,000 2018 $ 150,000 2018 $ 17,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 60,000 2017 $ 250,000 2018 $ 2,945,291 2017 $ 250,000 2018 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 75,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 150,000 2018 $ 100,000 2018 $ 200,000 2017 $ 400,000 2017 $ 50,000 2017 $ 20,000 2017 $ 200,000 2018 $ 20,000 2018
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 111
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
New Traffic Signals FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The New Traffic Signal Program promotes UDOT’s Zero Fatalities Strategic Goal by funding projects that improve safety at intersections.
Programmed funding 2016: $9 million 2017 proposed: $9 million 2018 proposed: $9 million 2019 proposed: $9 million
CONTACT
Jesse Sweeten, P.E. 801 965-4924 jsweeten@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS 12 new signals placed 31 signals updated 26 intersection upgrades, including left-turn upgrades, detection, etc. Advance warning signals installed in 7 locations 12 crossing upgrades, including school zones, HAWK signals, flashing beacons, etc.
New signals improve safety and mobility at SR-273 and 300 West in Kaysville
UDOT’s Traffic and Safety Division identifies intersections that may benefit from improved signal operation and works with region traffic engineers to oversee projects through investigation, design and construction. Traffic studies determine if the intersection meets the requirements to trigger a signal warranting process. Locations that meet criteria are evaluated, and traffic engineers determine the best options to meet safety and traffic needs. A streamlined contracting process and use of stockpiled materials helps to expedite projects to address safety issues as quickly as possible. The program objective is to reduce high severity crashes by: • Expediting signal installation • Providing safe pedestrian access • Installing left-turn phasing and dual left-turn lanes • Replacing outdated traffic signals • Planning projects and determining eligibility • Making emergency repairs
26 emergency signal repairs 7 lighting projects, including 4 small area lighting projects, and 3 upgrades
ePM Master PIN: 5952 Fund Code: ST_SIGNALS
Page 112
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 113
FY 2017 - New Traffic Signals Reg 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
County CACHE SALT LAKE TOOELE UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH UTAH
Route 0091P 0071P 0112P 0089P 0006P 0068P 0198P 0089P 0092P 0089P
BMP 23.76 2 5.874 347.75 159.83 28.3 3.69 334.3 4.44 345.05
EMP 23.8 2 5.87 348 160 28.3 3.69 334 4.44 345
PIN 14634 14570 14684 13061 13954 14243 14573 14575 14595 14683
Project Location US-91; MP 23.76 - 23.76 SR-71; MP 2.00 - 2.00 SR-112; MP 5.87 - 5.87 US-89; MP 347.75 - 347.83 US-6; MP 159.83 - 159.83 SR-68; MP 28.30 - 28.30 SR-198; MP 3.69 - 3.69 US-89; MP 334.30 - 334.30 SR-92; MP 4.44 - 4.44 US-89; MP 345.05 - 345.05
PIN Description US-91 & 1000 West (MP 23.76) SR-71 & Park Ave (MP 2.00) SR-112 & Industrial Loop Road (MP 5.87) US-89 at Main St/200 E, American Fork US-6 & Center Street (MP 159.83) SR-68 & Ring Road (2015 South) MP 28.30 SR-198 & 1400 South (MP 3.69) US-89 (300 S) & Freedom Blvd (200 W) MP 334.30 SR-92 & 6400 West (MP 4.44) US-89 (State St) & 200/220 South (MP 345.05)
PIN Status STIP STIP STIP Active Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping Scoping
Project Value Planned Year $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 30,000 2017 $ 2,945,291 2017 $ 30,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 15,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017 $ 25,000 2017
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROGRAMS
Page 115
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Maintenance Spot Improvements FUNDING
The Maintenance Spot Improvement Program corrects localized problems that could become a safety concern, but currently do not meet the Safety Spot Improvement Program guidelines.
Programmed funding 2016: $500 thousand 2017 proposed: $500 thousand 2018 proposed: $500 thousand 2019 proposed: $500 thousand
The ongoing work done by UDOT Maintenance crews is critical to maintaining and improving safety and mobility. Funding provides ongoing support for completing important improvements that cannot be met by other funding sources.
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
CONTACT
Region Program Managers & Lloyd Neeley 801 965-4789 lneeley@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since 2007, Maintenance crews and contractors under UDOT supervision have completed over 100 projects to maintain safety on state routes.
Cleaning a culvert
A wide variety of projects are eligible for funding. Some examples include: • Adding a left turn, right turn or through lane • Barrier upgrades or repair • Slope repair • Culvert repair, replacement, and cleaning The program is funded annually as an appropriation by the Utah Transportation Commission from the Transportation Fund. The Central Maintenance Division has program oversight and the region offices have direct responsibility for plan development, and contract management, and to verify that the completed work meets the project objectives. Each Region Engineering Team identifies candidate projects and develops a priority ranking based on available funding, field review and District Engineer recommendations.
ePM Master PIN: 5930 Funding Code: ST_ SPOT_MNT
Page 116
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Transportation Alternatives Program
Z/ ,&/ > /dz K>> ' s Eh ZK yd E^/KE E /< W d,
d
Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ç Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161; Ć?Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ŽĨ ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜÄ&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĸÄ? Ä?Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x161; Ä?ĆľĆ&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ć? Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ ^ĹśĹ˝Ç Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ^Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152; .(< (1*,1((5,1* (/(0(176 sÄ&#x201A;ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ç&#x2021; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?ĹľĆ&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A; Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹ t )81',1* $&48,6,7,21 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ç Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ĺś Ć&#x161;Ç Ĺ˝ Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;ͲÄ&#x17E;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ć?Í&#x2022; ϹϏϏ EĹ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ^ĹśĹ˝Ç Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; t '(6,*1 (1*,1((5,1* ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä?Ä&#x17E;ĹśÄ&#x17E;ÄŽĆ&#x161;Ć? ŽĨ Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜÄ&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśĆ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ t &216758&7,21 (1*,1((5,1* Ä?Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ć&#x2030;ĆľÄ?ĹŻĹ?Ä? ĨÄ&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ?ĹŻĹ?Ć&#x;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?ŽƾĆ?ĹŻÇ&#x2021; ŽŜůÇ&#x2021; Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; ŽŜÄ&#x17E; Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; $&(& +2125 $:$5' ŽƾĆ&#x161;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Í&#x2022; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?Ä&#x17E;ĆŠÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152; Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ĹśÄ?Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć?Í&#x2DC; &/,(17 %(1(),76 dĹ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśĆ?Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ĹŻĹ?Ŝŏ Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ć?Ć&#x;Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; t $'',7,21$/ Ä?ŽžžƾŜĹ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x2020;Ä?Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; ĨŽĆ&#x152; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; 75$163257$7,21 &$3$&,7< Ä?ŽŜĆ&#x;ŜƾÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ŽĨ Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś t $&&(66 72 38%/,& )$&,/,7,(6 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ć&#x152;ŽƾĹ?Ĺ&#x161;ŽƾĆ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2DC; dĹ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ç t %,.( 3('(675,$1 3$7+ Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161; Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A; Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ä?ŽŜÄ&#x161; t *5($7(5 (0(5*(1&< Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝ Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; ĎąÍ&#x2022;ĎϏϏͲĆ?Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć? $&&(66 Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Í&#x2022; Ç Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161; Ç Ĺ?ĹŻĹŻ Ĺ?ĹśÄ?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E; Ć?Ä&#x201A;ĨÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; t $&&(66 72 6(9,(5 9$//(< Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä&#x17E;Ç&#x2020;Ĺ?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x;ĹľÄ&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2DC; &(17(5 Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x201A;Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?ŽŽĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x17E;ÄŤĹ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x161; ŽĨ Ĺ?ŜĨĆ&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ˝Ç ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ć? Ć&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ć?ƾůĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?ŽžžŽÄ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ ŽĨ Ä&#x201A; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹŠĹ˝Ć&#x152; Ä?Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;ĹŻÍ&#x2022; Ĺ?ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ĺ?Ĺ&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021;Í&#x2022; ds Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; &267 Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;ĹŹĹ?ĹśĹ?Í&#x2022; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹŠĹ˝Ć&#x152; Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; Ä?Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ć?Ć?Ĺ?ĹśĹ?Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä?ŽůůÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152; Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Í&#x2022; ĆľĆ&#x;ĹŻĹ?Ć&#x;Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä&#x201A; Ä?Ĺ?ĹŹÄ&#x17E;ÍŹĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;Ĺś Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹŻĹŻ Ç Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ĺś Ä&#x201A; Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ĺ˝Ć&#x152;Í&#x2DC; ZĹ?Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ÄŽÄ&#x17E;ĹŻÄ&#x161; Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ć? Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; Ć&#x2030;ĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ç Ĺ?Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ć&#x2030;Ĺ˝Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x17E; Ĺ?ĹľĆ&#x2030;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161;Í&#x2DC; &203/(7(' t :ŽŜÄ&#x17E;Ć? Î&#x2DC; Ä&#x17E;DĹ?ĹŻĹŻÄ&#x17E; ĹśĹ?Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x17E;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä?ŽžĆ&#x2030;ĹŻÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x161; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ä&#x17E; Ä¨Ĺ˝ĹŻĹŻĹ˝Ç Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ć?Ä?Ĺ˝Ć&#x2030;Ä&#x17E; ŽĨ Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ä?Ä&#x17E;Ć? ĨŽĆ&#x152; Ć&#x161;Ĺ&#x161;Ĺ?Ć? Ć&#x2030;Ć&#x152;ŽŊÄ&#x17E;Ä?Ć&#x161;Í&#x2014; Íť WĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E;ĹŻĹ?ĹľĹ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x2021; Ć?Ć&#x161;ĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ĨƾŜÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Íť ĹśÇ&#x20AC;Ĺ?Ć&#x152;ŽŜžÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć?Ć&#x161;ĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä&#x17E;Ä&#x201A;Ć?Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ĺ?Ĺ&#x161;Ć&#x161;ͲŽĨͲ )81',1* Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x2039;ĆľĹ?Ć?Ĺ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ t &,% Íť ZĹ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ä&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ĺ?Ĺ?ĹśÍ&#x2022; Ĺ?ĹśÄ?ĹŻĆľÄ&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ć&#x152;Ĺ˝Ä&#x201A;Ä&#x161;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ç&#x2021; Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ŽžÄ&#x17E;Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä?Ć?Í&#x2022; Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;Ĺ˝Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ä?Ĺ&#x161;ĹśĹ?Ä?Ä&#x201A;ĹŻ Ć?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x161;ĆľĆ&#x152;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Í&#x2022; Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ĺ?ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E; Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ĺ&#x161;Ç&#x2021;Ä&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;ƾůĹ?Ä?Ć? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;ĹŻÇ&#x2021;Ć?Ĺ?Ć? &/,(17 &217$&7 Íť Ĺ?Ä&#x161;Ä&#x161;Ĺ?ĹśĹ? Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; Ä?ŽŜĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ä&#x201A;Ç Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x161; t 0,.( /$1*6721 Íť ŽŜĆ?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ĺ˝Ä?Ć?Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ç&#x20AC;Ä&#x201A;Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ä&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x161; ĹľÄ&#x201A;ĹśÄ&#x201A;Ĺ?Ä&#x17E;ĹľÄ&#x17E;ĹśĆ&#x161; &,7< 0$1$*(5 Íť ŽŜĆ?Ć&#x161;Ć&#x152;ĆľÄ?Ć&#x;ŽŜ Ć?Ć&#x161;Ä&#x201A;ĹŹĹ?ĹśĹ? 5,&+),(/' &,7< Íť DÄ&#x201A;Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć&#x152;Ĺ?Ä&#x201A;ĹŻĆ? Ć&#x161;Ä&#x17E;Ć?Ć&#x;ĹśĹ? Íť ŽŜĆ&#x161;Ć&#x152;Ä&#x201A;Ä?Ć&#x161; Ä?ĹŻĹ˝Ć?Ä&#x17E;ŽƾĆ&#x161;
FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
Programmed funding 2015: $6.4 million 2016: $6.5 million 2017: $6.5 million 2018 proposed: $6.5 million
CONTACT
Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Snow College Richfield Bike Path (Richfield City Project Sponsor)
The Transportation Alternatives Program supports projects that enhance safety and expand options for non-drivers, mitigate environmental impacts and convert former interstate facilities to new uses. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) changed the way funds are distributed and programmed. Funds are split in half between Utah Metropolitan Planning Agencies and UDOT. To qualify for funding all projects must fit into one of nine federally designated categories. Examples include: â&#x20AC;˘ Construction, planning and design of facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act â&#x20AC;˘ Safe routes for non drivers to access daily needs. â&#x20AC;˘ Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails. â&#x20AC;˘ Any Environmental mitigation activity â&#x20AC;˘ Reduced vehicle-caused wildlife mortality â&#x20AC;˘ Safe Routes to School projects FOR MORE INFORMATION: visit the UDOT TAP web page.
Price City, Main Street, 100 East to 200 East (JHC SU) Lehi Historic Utah Southern Rail Trail â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Phase II (MAG -2014/2015) 700 West; 7200 South 5 Ĺ&#x20AC; 3 Ĺ&#x20AC; 0 Ĺ&#x20AC; 5 to 7800 South, Trails and Bike paths, Midvale City (WFRC) ,&+),(/'
5,&(
$17,
226(9(/7
Welby Jacob and Bngham Creek; North City Limit to South City Limit, South Jordan (WFRC)
Transportation alternatives expand options for non-drivers by funding a broad range of projects, including on and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Snow College Richfield Bike Path, sponsored by Richfield City, built a collector road and bike and pedestrian path between two dead-end roads, 500 North and Snow College Richfield. Read more about the project on the Jones and DeMille website.
Center Street Trail; Redwood
Road to Legacy Parkway (WFRC)
Fund Code: TAP
Page 117
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Freight Program FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016 proposed: $10.6 million 2017 proposed: $10.4 million 2018 proposed: $11.3 million 2019 proposed: $12.7 million
The Freight Program, part of the UDOT Planning Division, supports the efficient movement of goods along major freight corridors by partnering with the freight community and conducting transportation studies and public outreach. Find Utah’s Freight Plan online: http://www.udot.utah. gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=23980801691013244
CONTACT
Daniel B. Kuhn Railroad & Freight Planner 801 965-4148 dkuhn@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Utah Freight Plan, 2015 Utah State Rail Plan, 2015 I-15 Truck Parking Study, 2010-2016
C.R. England Inc. Tempstack temperature-controlled intermodal container. Headquartered in Salt Lake City, C.R. England is the world’s largest temperaturecontrolled trucking and intermodal corporation. Photo courtesy of C.R. England Inc.
Detailed and concise freight planning supports the local economy by minimizing the cost of moving goods – a cost that can be reflected in the price consumers pay for food, clothing, fuel, and other necessities. Freight planning also allows UDOT to focus limited resources on projects that support economic activity. Current efforts include: Completion and acceptance of Utah’s first freight plan — Planning staff worked with Utah’s Freight Mobility Group and other stakeholders to complete the Utah Freight Plan. This 20-year plan is a resource of information that feeds directly into UDOT’s Long Range Transportation Plan, and Utah’s Unified Plan. Completion and acceptance of the Utah State Rail Plan – The first comprehensive assessment of Utah’s rail operations and needs since 1996. Focused on freight, this plan enables UDOT to implement an integrated approach that will incorporate freight and passenger rail elements into the larger multi-modal and intermodal framework, and feeds into the Utah Freight Plan. Conduct ongoing public outreach — Planning staff maintain a partnership with the Utah Trucking Association and freight stakeholders by updating industry partners and encouraging feedback. Freight economics planning — Planning staff develop and evaluate performance measures and report results in the annual UDOT Strategic Direction. A formal stakeholder outreach and communication plan keeps UDOT Planning in sync with industry and state economic development partners. In 2016, UDOT staff are working on a draft Freight Mobility and Trade Plan. Page 118
UTAH FREIGHT PROGRAM County
Region
Entity
Route
Project Description
Length (miles)
Improvement
Add WB passing lane from MP 31.2 to MP 32.7, Daniels Canyon North of Summit
1.5
Passing Lane
0.8
3.1
Wasatch
3
UDOT
U.S. 40
Emery
4
UDOT
U.S. 6
Emery
4
UDOT
U.S. 6
Extend WB passing lane from MP 261.2 to MP 262.0 Add WB passing lane from MP 266.8 and 269.9
Score
Scoring Category
FY
$5,000,000
50-59
Passing
2016
Passing Lane
$1,800,000.00
40-49
Passing
2016
Passing Lane
$7,300,000.00
30-39
Passing
2016
Score
Scoring Category
FY
Estimated Cost
$14,100,000 County
Region
Entity
Route
Project Description
Widen to 4 lanes from Moab to U.S. 191 Colorado River Bridge (MP 126.3 to MP 128.0)
Length (miles)
Improvement
2.1
Widening
$13,500,000
10-19
Widening
2017-2018
Estimated Cost
Grand
4
UDOT
Emery
4
UDOT
U.S. 6
Add EB and WB from MP 291.7 and 293.7
2
Passing Lane
$9,000,000
40-49
Passing
2017-2018
Salt Lake
2
WFRC
I-80
Widen EB to 4 lanes from I-215 (east) to Lambs Canyon Road
8
Widening
$37,000,000
50-59
Widening
2017-2018
Tooele
2
UDOT
2.8
New Construction
$100,000,000
11
New Construction
2017-2018
Statewide
Various
Statewide
Various
SR-201; Extension to SR-36 Truck Parking/Intelligent Various Parking: Interstates and NHS routes,â&#x20AC;Ś SR-201
Motor Carrier: Facility and Various Technology Imp; US-6 Price Canyon POE, chain-up areas
Various
4
UDOT
I-70
Weber
1
WFRC
I-15
Washington
4
DMPO
I-15
Juab
3
UDOT
Iron
4
UDOT
Wasatch
3
UDOT
I-15
ATMS fiber and ITS devices on I-70 from I15 to SR-6 Interchange upgrade at 24th [Street/Midland Drive (SR-126 to I15)] Initial SR-9 Interchange Modifications Add NB passing lane from MP 230.0 to MP 233.0, Between Nephi and Mona
Add WB passing lane from MP 7.5 to MP 10.0 US-189; Wallsburg to U.S. 189 Charleston S.R. 20
n/a
2017-2018
n/a
2017-2018
130
Operational
$30,000,000
n/a
n/a
2017-2018
1.5
Interchange Upgrade New Widen
$80,000,000
40-49
Upgrade Interchange
2017-2018
0.5
Upgrade Interchange
$37,000,000
60-69
Upgrade Interchange
2017-2018
3
Passing Lane
$10,050,000
60-69
Passing
2017-2018
2.5
Passing Lane
$5,875,000
30-39
Passing
2017-2018
6.9
Widening
$46/$73 Million
60-69
Passing
2017-2018
WEBER B O X
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
RICH
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
S A LT L A K E
Grantsville
191 44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
144
§ ¦ ¨ 15
92 Lehi
92
146
73
Heber City
Vernal
35
WASATCH
Naples
121 Tabiona
U T A H
13389
189
208 Myton Duchesne
Springville
77
40 !
141
88 45
68
U I N T A H
198 6 !
Eureka
40
40
89
6
6
36
40 !
87 Roosevelt
Provo
Vernon
149
191 89 Mona
Nephi
J U A B
6
SANPETE
132
132
C A R B O N Helper
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
E M E R Y
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Delta
Scofield
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
M I L L A R D
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Manti Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016
Freight
T O O E L E
113
Eureka
U T A H
Mona
132
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
116
Helper
264
Fairview
Hiawatha
Manti
50
159
28
M I L L A R D
Castle Dale
70
Green River
E M E R Y
G R A N D
19
§ ¦ ¨
Crescent Jct.
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
Richfield
128
119 118
161
24
Monroe
70
Milford
24 Moab
72
§ ¦ ¨
B E A V E R
§ ¦ ¨
Marysvale
PIUTE
Freight
Kanosh
6 !
14723
Emery
SE VI ER
15
21
10
260
118
14722
Ferron
Salina
99
257
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
Cleveland
Sterling
137
50 100
124 155
Clawson
Holden
§ ¦ ¨
122
57
29
Gunnison
50
123
Huntington
89
Sunnyside
Wellington
31
Ephraim
Hinckley
Region 4
U I N T A H
157 Price
117
136
CARBON
Scofield
132
125 Delta
191
96
Levan
174
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
89
Nephi
J U A B
6
313
25
279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell
Beaver Minersville
62
153
24
22
89
Antimony
130
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
W A Y N E
46
21
20
56
Torrey
Junction
Parowan
95 211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
S A N
Hurricane
276
9
9
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
J U A N 95
Glendale
7
Blanding
Tropic
89 17
191
95
14
WA S HI N G TO N
St. George
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2016
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The Railway-Highway Grade Crossing Program, funded by the Federal Highway Administration, supports data collection efforts and projects that mitigate at-grade crossing crash risk.
Programmed funding 2016: $1.6 million 2017 proposed: $1.6 million 2018 proposed: $1.6 million 2019 proposed: $1.7 million
CONTACT
Eric Cheng 801 965-4284 echeng@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Completed Projects: Spanish Fork Railroad Consolidation Study Public Grade Crossing signage upgrades in UDOT Region One Ongoing Projects: Statewide Railroad Signal Preemption Manual 5900 South; State Street to 700 West, westbound exit gate at TRAX crossing Commuter Rail North Pedestrian Treatments Program Public grade crossing signage upgrades in UDOT Regions Two, Three and Four Warning devices on Faust Road in Tooele County
A railroad advance warning signal
UDOT oversees all public highway-rail at-grade crossings in Utah. Railroads have responsibility for safety at all private at-grade crossings. The goal of the program is to improve the safety of all crossing users, and to support the efficient use of crossings by trains, vehicles and pedestrians by: • Eliminating public at-grade crossings, where possible • Performing yearly inspections to update the safety features inventory and working with municipalities to assure that deficiencies are corrected • Funding projects that mitigate crash risk The program has many important ongoing efforts, including: • Development of guidelines to standardize preemption of traffic signals near at-grade crossings, and project identification • Partnering with UTA to install pedestrian safety devices at grade crossings along the TRAX Blue Line and the commuter lines in compliance with UDOT Standards. • Upgrading advance warning sighs with deficient retroreflectivity and adjusting distance from crossing to meet current standards.
US-6 Railroad advance warning signals and crossing upgrades in Lynndyl Statewide pedestrian crossing improvements
ePM Master PIN: 6064 Fund Code: R/H_XXXX_XXX
Page 122
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 123
FY 2017~2020 RAIL PROJECTS
Reg 1
County VARIOUS
Route
1 1 1 2 2 2
CACHE VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS SALT LAKE SALT LAKE
1204P
2
BMP
EMP
PIN
0
0
2364P
0.504 0 0 0 0 0.591
0.504 0 0 0 0 0.611
SALT LAKE
2135P
1.394
1.394
2 2
SALT LAKE VARIOUS
0209P
6.933 0
6.933 0
3 3 3 3 4 4 4 B B B B B B
VARIOUS VARIOUS VARIOUS UTAH CARBON VARIOUS VARIOUS STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE STATEWIDE
0132P
32.919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32.919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Location 13534 Specific locations TBD SR-30; MP 109.16 - 109.16 & Cnty:FA-1193; MP .15 - .15 & Cnty:FA-1210; MP .06 - .06 & Cnty:FA-1200; MP 1.56 - 1.56 & Cnty:FA14566 1204; MP .50 - .50 13542 Regionwide study 13544 Locations in R1 TBD 13535 Specific locations TBD 13545 TRAX line crossing 14569 Cnty:FA-2364; MP .59 - .61 & 300 North RR xing Cnty:FA-2135; MP 1.39 - 1.39 & Cnty:FA-2258; MP 2.22 - 2.22 & Cnty:FA-2305; MP .41 - .41 & crossings at 520 S 500 W; 900 S 14572 @~600 W; 1800 S 900 W; 1450 S Pioneer Rd; and 200 W Paxton Ave SR-209; MP 6.93 - 6.93 & SR-172; MP 2.05 - 2.05 & Cnty:FA-2161; MP 2.98 - 2.98 & crossings at ~4200 W 9000 S, 4550 W New 14579 Bingham Hwy, and 4690 S 5600 W 13540 Locations in R2 TBD 13533 13536 13546 14580 13529 13541 13537 13538 13539 14718 14719 14720 14721
SR-132; MP 32.92 - 32.92 & SR-74; MP .15 - .15 & SR-114; MP 9.03 - 9.03 & SR-114; MP 9.32 - 9.32 & SR-147; MP 13.26 - 13.26 Specific locations TBD Locations in R3 TBD Cnty:FA-2845; MP 1.24 - 1.24 & realignment of Tintic Line and elimination of 6 crossings Cnty:FA-1335; MP .42 - .42 & 3 separate crossings Locations in R4 TBD Various Locations in Region 4 Non-construction project Non-construction project Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support Statewide staffing support
PIN Description Region 1 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades
PIN Status Proposed
Project Value Planned Year $ 107,000 2017
Logan Ped Xing Improvements Region 1 RR Corridor Studies Region 1 RR Grade Xing Upgrades Region 2 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades West Jordan Ped Xing Upgrades West High School Ped Overpass
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
$ $ $ $ $ $
879,949 50,000 680,000 832,000 60,000 500,000
2017 2018 2019 2017 2017 2018
Salt Lake City Ped Xing Improvements
Proposed
$
505,000
2018
Region 2 Ped Xing Improvements Region 2 Grade Xing Upgrades
Proposed Proposed
$ $
40,000 140,384
2018 2019
Region 3 Ped Xing Improvements Region 3 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades Region 3 RR Grade Xing Upgrades Tintic Line Realignment (will be added to R3 PIN) Price Ped Xing Improvements Region 4 RR Signal Preemption Upgrades Region 4 RR Grade Xing Upgrades RR Xing Program Management FY17 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY17 RR Xing Program Management FY18 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY18 RR Xing Program Management FY19 FRA RR Xing Inventory FY19
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
100,000 512,000 466,000 866,000 145,000 150,000 192,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 90,000 120,000
2017 2017 2018 2019 2017 2017 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 125
42
30
Snowville
200
61 Trenton
142
142 91
23
§ ¦ ¨
218
15
89
81
30
83
38
30
14566
C A C H E
23
102
30
Logan
Randolph
240
B O X
R I C H
101
165
13
16
89 !
E L D E R
Brigham City
Woodruff
39 16
89
39 158
13534
§ ¦ ¨ 15
13542
W E B E R Huntsville
13544 Ogden
167
M O R G A N Morgan
D A V I S
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Farmington
S U M M I T
66
Coalville
T O O E L E Wendover
Bountiful
67
S A L T
65
L A K E Salt Lake City
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing
§ ¦ ¨ 84
Region 1
Garden City
C A C H E R I C H
WEBER B O X
E L D E R
Ogden
Region 2
Huntsville
§ ¦ ¨
Morgan
D A V I S
80
Farmington
§ ¦ ¨ 84
65
Coalville Bountiful
S U M M I T 14572
Wendover
§ ¦ ¨ 80
13535
14569 Salt Lake City
201
14572 14579 13545
138 Grantsville
36 112
T O O E L E
Tooele
14579
65 150
14572
13540
224
32
40 Park City
Kamas
248
SALT LAKE
150 35
Draper Heber City
196 36
W A S A T C H
Lehi
Tabiona
199
D U C H E S N E
73
Roosevelt
Provo
36
Myton Duchesne
Springville
U T A H
Vernon
Eureka
J U A B
Mona
C A R B O N
Scofield
Nephi
Helper
EMERY Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing
M O R G A N
WEBER B O X
RICH
Huntsville
MORGAN
Ogden
E L D E R
Region 3
Morgan
D A V I S
Farmington
43
DAGGETT
Manila
Bountiful
S U M M I T
Salt Lake City
Wendover
S A LT L A K E
Grantsville
191 44
DUCHESNE
Park City
191
Kamas
40 ! 32
Tooele
222
Draper
144
T O O E L E
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Vernal
35
WASATCH
Naples
92 13533 146 13533 189
Lehi
73
UTAH
113
Heber City
121 Tabiona
13536
68 141
208 Myton Duchesne
40 !
198
88 45
U I N T A H
13533 6 !
Eureka
40
40 Provo
13546
77 Springville 14580
6
6
36
40 !
87 Roosevelt
89 Vernon
149
191 89 Mona
J U A B
13533 6
Nephi
SANPETE
132
132
C A R B O N Helper
Fairview Levan
78
Moroni
Price
Mount Pleasant
Wellington
Sunnyside
Hiawatha
28
EMERY
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Delta
Scofield
Ephraim
Hinckley
Huntington
M I L L A R D
Manti
Clawson Mayfield
Holden
G R A N D
Castle Dale
Sterling Gunnison
Cleveland
Ferron
SEVIER Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing
Coalville
T O O E L E
Eureka
U T A H
Mona
174
Fairview
Moroni
Mount Pleasant
Price
31 Hiawatha
117
Huntington
Hinckley Manti
50
28
89
57
29
159
Sterling
260
99
13537
118
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Kanosh
13541
Monroe
70
Salina
Emery
§ ¦ ¨
Green River
E M E R Y
19 Crescent Jct.
§ ¦ ¨
70
70
163 !
24
§ ¦ ¨ Marysvale
128
24 Moab
72
70
Milford
§ ¦ ¨
119
118
B E A V E R
6 !
Ferron
10
SE VI E R
Richfield
161
Mayfield
256
Fillmore
257
21
137
50 100
Cleveland
Clawson
Holden
M I L L A R D
GRAND
124 155
Castle Dale
Gunnison
50
Sunnyside
123
122
Ephraim
136
13529 Wellington
PIUTE
Region 4
U I N T A H
157
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing
Delta
116
Helper
264
132
125
CARBON
Scofield
Levan
132
191
96
89
Nephi
J U A B
WASATCH D U C H E S N E
6
313
25
279 Loa Hanksville Bicknell
Beaver Minersville
62
153
24
22
89
Antimony
130
G A R F I E L D Boulder
I R O N
W A Y N E
46
21
20
56
Torrey
Junction
Parowan
95 211
Monticello
276
491
Panguitch Escalante
Cedar City
143
63
Enterprise
219
§ ¦ ¨ 15
18
S A N
Hurricane
276
9
9
262
261
K A N E
162
89 59
J U A N 95
Glendale
7
Blanding
Tropic
89 17
191
95
14
WA S H I N G TO N
St. George
12
12
162
316 191
Kanab
163
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3
Region 4
I
Map Produced by: UDOT GIS Organization: UDOT Map Production Date: 4/4/2016
0
200 Miles
Project Year 2017 2018 2019
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Non-Urban Program FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $4.4 million 2017 Proposed: $5.2 million 2018 Proposed: $5.5 million 2019 Proposed: $5.7 million
CONTACT
The Joint Highway Committee Non-Urban Program provides federal funding for roadway safety and condition improvements in communities having a population of 5000 or less. The Joint Highway Committee oversees applications on an annual basis; however local agencies may only have one project in the program at one time, and projects must be completed before agencies submit another application. Preference is given to projects that provide safety features and upgrade and improve existing roadway conditions.
Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS SR-87; Climbing Lane North of Duchesne, UDOT Region Three Project Sponsor 700 East; 300 North to 650 North, Morgan City Project Sponsor Turn Lanes Project; SR-89 & 300 West, Garden City, UDOT Region Three Project Sponsor SR-87 climbing lanes north of Duchesne
Recent federal changes reduced the amount of funding to the program by 35 percent. UDOT provided funding to keep the program whole and conform to the STIP through 2014. Projects must be located within non-urban areas and functionally classified as a major collector or higher. The value of the project must be between $4 hundred-thousand and $2 million. Funding for the NU program for FY 2015 is expected to decrease to approximately $3.9 in FY 2015.
FUND CODE: STP_RURAL
Page 130
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 131
Joint Highway Comission: Non Urban Program Reg 1 2 3 3 3 4
County RICH SUMMIT JUAB DAGGETT UINTAH SAN JUAN
Route 0089P 2608P 1826P 1364P 2776P 2416P
4
VARIOUS
0118P
BMP
EMP
498 7.8 12.031 16.869 9 31.502
498.3 9.06 13.716 23.823 12.5 35.578
6.824
10.042
Project Location PIN Description US-89; MP 498.00 - 498.30 & 300 West: SR-89 to Buttercup Blvd, Gar 300 West: SR-89 to Buttercup Blvd, Garden City Cnty:FA-2608; MP 7.80 - 9.06 & Cnty:FA-2608; MP 6.40 - 7.40 & Nort North & South Main St. Overlay Phase 2, Coalville Old Hwy 91: 7800 No to Utah County Line Old Hwy 91 Phase IV Cnty:FA-1364; MP 16.87 - 23.82 Browns Park Road Phase 3 Cnty:FA-2776; MP 9.00 - 12.50 & Red Wash Road, Phase 2 (3.0 Miles) Red Wash Road, Phase 2 (3.0 Miles) Hatch Trading Post Road Hatch Trading Post Road SR-119; MP .00 - 4.55 & SR-118; MP 6.82 - 10.04 & US-6; MP 89.40 Region 4 Chip Seals Various Locations 8624 107.05
PIN 10882 12944 10881 10880 12945 10879
Project Value Planned Year $ 1,072,616 $ 2,145,232 $ 2,145,000 $ 2,145,232 $ 1,870,000 $ 2,145,000
2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 2017
$
2018
2,145,232
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 133
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Small Urban Program FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $6.2 million 2017 Proposed: $3.3 million 2018 Proposed: $3.5 million 2019 Proposed: $3.6 million
CONTACT
The Joint Highway Committee Small Urban Program provides federal funding for roadway safety and condition improvements for communities having a population between 5 thousand and 2 hundredthousand. The Joint Highway Committee oversees applications to the program on an annual basis; however local agencies may only have one project in the program at one time. Preference is given to projects that provide safety features and upgrade and improve existing roadway conditions.
Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov
Recent federal changes reduced the amount of funding to the program by 12 percent. UDOT is providing funding to keep the program whole and conform to the STIP through 2014.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
To be eligible, projects must be located within small urban areas and functionally classified as a major collector or higher. The maximum amount of federal aid available for a project is $1 million.
Recent projects: 1000 North, 2300 East to I-15, Tremonton Project Sponsor Heber Daniel Road, Heber City Project Sponsor 500 West, Phase 3; Mill Creek Bridge to Kane Creek Moab City Project Sponsor
Deer Valley Drive -- Park City is adding utility, storm drain and safety improvements. Traffic flow will be improved by constructing bus pullouts. The roadway will be resurfaced from the roundabout to Deer Valley North.
Fund Code: STP_SU_JHC
Page 134
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 135
Joint Highway Comission: Small Urban Program Reg 2 2 2
County SUMMIT TOOELE SUMMIT
Route 2602P 0138P 2602P
3 3 3 4 4 4 4
UINTAH DUCHESNE DUCHESNE CARBON GRAND CARBON SEVIER
0040P 1546P 1546P 1327P 1693P 1327P 2552P
BMP EMP 4.558 18.129 2.575 145.866 5.629 6.071 0.385 0 0.63 0
PIN 5 11854 18 11856 3 13882 148 6 6 0.727 0 1 0
11855 12938 13884 10859 11852 12939 13880
Project Location PIN Description Project Value Planned Year 2017 Cnty:FA-2602; MP 4.56 - 4.58 Summit County, Kilby Road Landmark Drive $ 1,500,000 2018 SR-138; MP 18.13 - 18.25 SR-138 & Village Road Improvements, Tooele Count $ 1,420,000 2019 Cnty:FA-2602; MP 2.58 - 2.75 & Cnty:FA-2598; MP .00 - .08 & Cnty:FAJeremy Ranch Frontage Rd Intersection Improveme $ 1,971,000 US-40; MP 145.87 - 148.23 US-40, Safety Street Lighting, 500 S to 2850 S State Street; 800 South to 1800 South in Roosevelt State Street; 800 South to 1800 South, Roosevelt Cnty:FA-1546; MP 6.07 - 6.26 & State Street Phase II Pedestrian & Ve State Street Phase II Pedestrian & Vehicle Safety 1900 East Price Phase II: 300 N to 600 North 1900 East Price: 300 N to 600 N Millcreek Drive Intersection Improvements Moab City, Millcreek Drive Intersection Improveme Cnty:FA-1327; MP .63 - 1.00 & 1900 East, 600 North to 800 North in P1900 East Phase III, 600 North to 800 North Cnty:FA-2552; MP .00 - .28 & 100 East Phase III, 300 South to Main St100 East Phase III, 300 South to Main Street
$ $ $ $ $ $
836,950 1,197,000 998,000 888000 1,200,000 919,000 1,290,000
2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2019 2019
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 137
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Off-System Bridge Program FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $4.6 million 2017 Proposed: $1.8 million 2018 Proposed: $1.8 million 2019 Proposed: $1.8 million
The Joint Highway Commission Off-System Bridge Program helps aid in removing deficient structures from the National Bridge Inventory while allowing local agencies to receive a soft match credit toward a future Highway Bridge Program eligible project.
CONTACT
The Joint Highway Commission oversees the program and accepts project applications on an annual basis. The program improves public safety and reduces ongoing maintenance costs often associated with aging infrastructure.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The structure must be located on a rural minor collector or urban or rural local road. The Sufficiency Rating of the structure must be less than 80 for rehabilitation and less than 50 for replacement. For more information visit the Off-System Bridge Program page on the UDOT Website.
Chris Potter 801 964-4463 cpotter@utah.gov
1000 North, 2300 East to I-15, Tremonton Project Sponsor Heber Daniel Road Bridge, Heber City Project Sponsor 500 West, Phase 3; Mill Creek Bridge to Kane Creek, Moab City Project Sponsor
The Icy Springs Bridge has a wider cross-section and increased span to improve safety and reduce flooding.
The Malad River Bridge has an increased clear span and higher elevation to reduce flooding.
Fund Code: STP_BR
Page 138
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 139
Reg 4
County WASHINGTON
Route 3226P
Joint Highway Comission: Off-System Bridge Program
Project Location BMP EMP PIN 9.161 11859 Rockville City, Structure Replacement 053019C 9.092
PIN Description Rockville City, Structure Replacement 053019C
Project Value Planned Year $ 3,200,000 2017
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 141
Federal Lands Access Program FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $10.5 million 2017 proposed: $10.5 million 2018 proposed: $10.5 million 2019 proposed: $10.5 million 2020 proposed: $10.5 million 2021 proposed: $10.5 million 2022 proposed: $10.5 million
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
The Federal Lands Access Program, established by Federal Map 21 legislation, provides funding for transportation project that are in, provide access to, or are adjacent to Federal Lands. The program is intended to support economic activity generated by tourism and recreation sites. The program is funded through Highway Account of the Highway Trust fund. Programming decisions are made locally by a Program Decisions Committee. Funds are distributed to states according to a formula based on the number of visitors, federal land area, federal public road mileage, and the number of federal public bridges. A non-federal funding match is required. Program funds can be applied to design, construction, and reconstruction, but not maintenance projects. State, tribal, or local government agencies that own or maintain transportation facilities are eligible to apply.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Six projects have been selected, planned, and programmed through 2017. Sponsors include Bryce Canyon City, Wasatch County, Kane County, UDOT, Sevier County and Juab County. For more information, see the Utah Access Program page on the FWHA website.
The SR-149, Jensen to Dinosaur National Monument Project is funded at $11.4 million. UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s participation rate is 6.77 percent. The project will widen SR-149 from milepost 0 to MP 4.22 to include 12 foot travel lanes and 4 foot shoulders, and will replace a bridge at milepost 2.7. FHWA Central Federal Lands Division is performing all design efforts, and UDOT will provide design review, construction input, and final acceptance. The project will be constructed in 2015.
Fund Code: TBD
Utah Federal Lands Access Program Proposed/Draft Project Selection Project Name
Description of Work
Applicant
FLMAs Accessed
County
Year
Sevenmile-Gooseberry
Placing pavement on the remaining 5.1 miles of this 28 mile route in Phase 2
Sevier County
Fishlake NF
Sevier
2013
Little Sahara Sand Dunes and Highway 148
Pulverization and paving of 13.7 miles of Highway 148 and the Sand Dunes Road to provide a safe, smooth public access to the Little Sahara Recreation Area and Cherry Creek
Juab County
$2,791,000
Little Sahara Recreation Area
La Sal Mountain Loop Road
Cascade Springs Road Dinosaur National Monument Access Road SR-149, Shoulder Widening & Bike Lanes
Improve 8.7 miles of roadway including asphalt pulverizing and replacement, full depth reclamation of existing asphalt and road base, importing road base where necessary, roadway widening and drainage improvements Replace the old culverts, add guardrail, and place new hot mix asphalt surface on the roadway The project will widen the road to include bike lanes on the shoulders
Juab
2014 $6,683,000
This project will provide planning, engineering, construction documents and construction of a Bryce Canyon Bicycle/Pedestrian Bryce Canyon City Bryce Canyon NP, Dixie NF separated bicycle/pedestrian Pathway pathway from the existing Transportation Hub in Bryce Canyon City to Bryce Canyon National Park Reconstruction of a 2-lane highway Navajo Lake Road Reconstruction in compliance with AASHTO standards
Cost Estimate
Kane County
Dixie NF
Garfield
2015
$841,000 Kane
2015 $6,959,000
Grand County
Manti-LaSal NF
Grand
2016
$11,657,000 Wasatch County
Uintah NF
Wasatch
2017 $6,514,000
UDOT
Dinosaur NM
Uintah
2018 $7,964,000 $43,409,000
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 143
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
State Planning FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
State Planning Program provides data and other information about the transportation system to help plan transportation improvements and expand active transportation options.
Programmed funding 2016: $5.4 million 2017 proposed: $5.5 million
CONTACT
Jeff Harris 801-965-4354 jeffharris@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Long range planning lead to a completed plan document for the years 2015-2040 which will be finalized and integrated with the Unified Plan in FY 2016. Planning staff collaborated with Utah DAQ on current air quality issues including PM2.5 SIP development, PM 10 SIP Issues in Utah County and emerging AirQuality issues in the Uintah Basin Planning staff and stakeholders formed a statewide Active Transportation Coordination Committee. An Integrated Transportation Workshop was sponsored by UDOT Planning and transportation agencies and focused on planning for a seamless, integrated transportation system.
Road Respect educates drivers and cyclists about the rules of the road
State Planning is funded through the Federal Highway Administration’s State Planning and Research Program. UDOT’s planning functions include: Long Range Planning – an ongoing, collaborative, comprehensive effort culminating in a documented plan every four years. Community Planning – Providing data and expert guidance to develop Community Transportation Plans for local areas. Air Quality – Working with regulatory agencies and local MPOs to assure compliance with federal air quality rules TravelWise and Road Respect – working with the Governor’s office and private industry to encourage trip reduction strategies for road users and administering the Road Respect safety program. Active Transportation – Identifying facility improvements through the Collaborative Active Transportation Study. Travel Demand Management – forecasting future impacts to roadways, transit, and freight-moving corridors. Rail and Freight Planning – working with industry partners to improve interstate freight and passenger vehicle travel.
Fund Code: SPR
Page 144
State Research FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $1.5 million 2017 proposed: $ 1.5 million 2018 proposed: $ 1.5 million 2019 proposed: $ 1.5 million
CONTACT
Cameron Kergaye 801-965-2576 ckergaye@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS The annual UTRAC Workshop, a collaborative effort among researchers and UDOT experts to identify research priorities, was held in March 2015. Participants ranked projects according to high-need areas.
The UDOT Research Division works with FHWA, other public agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector to support research and provide high-value information to the transportation community. Research Division activities include: • Identifying implementable research ideas • Managing research projects • Publishing and presenting reports, results and recommendations • Promoting new technologies through tours or demonstrations • Providing library services • Working with other states on pool-funded research in areas of concern UDOT Research Division annual funding for research projects is provided through the Federal State Planning and Research Program. Additional funding is provided by the state of utah and other federal programs. Research activities are federally mandated.
Research projects are conducted by university and consultant researchers with oversight by State Research Division staff and help from other divisions. Research staff are currently managing 40 SPR funded research projects and 13 state funded projects. UDOT Research Division activities provide opportunities for university students to engage in high-value research to benefit the transportation community.
Fund Code: SPR
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Alternative Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Emergency Relief Fund FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding Funding varies. Up to $100 million is available to a state for each natural disaster or catastrophic failure.
The federal Emergency Relief Program is a special program from the Highway Trust Fund for the repair or reconstruction of Federal-aid highways and roads on Federal lands which have suffered serious damage as a result of natural disasters or catastrophic failures from an external cause, and not an inherent flaw in the facility.
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
ER funding helped UDOT repair damage to SR-14 caused by a landslide. Approved ER funds are available at the pro-rata share that would normally apply to the Federal-aid facility damaged. For Interstate highways, the Federal share is 90 percent. For all other highways, the Federal share is 80 percent. Emergency repair work to restore essential travel, minimize the extent of damage, or protect the remaining facilities, accomplished in the first 180 days after the disaster occurs, may be reimbursed at 100 percent federal share. It is the responsibility of the State to request ER funds based on detailed damage inspection reports (DDIR) prepared by the Department of Transportation. An emergency declaration by the Governor allows the state DOT to file a notice of intent with the FHWA office to initiate the ER application process.
Page 146
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Metropolitan Planning Organizations FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 Programmed funding 2016: $2.8 million 2017 proposed: $2.8 million 2018 proposed: $2.8 million 2019 proposed: $2.8 million
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
Metropolitan Planning Organizations are the federally mandated and funded transportation planning entity for urban areas with a population over 50 thousand. MPOs act as a partner in coordination with cities, counties, transit and state transportation agencies to develop and recommend improvements to highways and transit. Utah’s MPOs each develop a 30-year Regional Transportation Program, called the Long-Range Plan and a Transportation Improvement Program. The LRP is produced every four years and lists capacity-driven projects addressing longterm mobility needs.
THE PLANNING PROCESS Transportation planning is a cooperative process designed to foster involvement by all users of the system through a proactive public participation process. Utah’s MPOs include: Cache Metropolitan Planning Organization - MPO for Cache Valley urban area Dixie Metropolitan Planning Organization - MPO for the St. George urban area Mountainland Association of Governments - MPO for the Provo and Orem urban area Wasatch Front Regional Council - MPO for the Salt Lake City and Ogden urban areas
Strategic, data-based planning helps identify and prioritize projects that address delay.
The TIP is produced annually and includes capacity projects from the LRP and short-term projects (such as pavement or operational improvements) from federal, state, and local governments and transit agencies. UDOT’s State Transportation Improvement Program – the STIP – includes projects from the LRP and TIP.
PL_MAG PL_WFRC
Page 147
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Alternative Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Federal Funds Exchange CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov Recent Funds Exchanges:
The Federal Funds Exchange Program allows local governments to exchange federal transportation funds for state funds. The program provides funding flexibility for local governments. UDOT coordinates with the Joint Highway Committee and/or the Metropolitan Planning Organization to determine appropriate projects for the exchange.
Funds exchanges are made frequently and the project purpose and fund amount vary. Examples include: North Salt Lake exchanged $2 million of funds from the I-15 South Davis County Operational Upgrades project to fund improvements on the 2600 South intersection improvement project. The Town of Virgin exchanged $2 million of 2014 STP_Rural Federal funds for $1.25 million of Region Fourâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2014 State Preservation funds, and $0.45 million of Region Four State Preservation Efficiency funds. Virgin Town supplied the required 10% match to fund the US-50; Scipio to County Line, MP 129.816 to MP 149.13 Lane Level/Chip Seal Coat project.
US-50 Funds Exchange projects are approved by the Utah Transportation commission. Once approved, local governments and UDOT enter into a cooperative agreement that details the required project documentation, performance reporting and invoice submission. A UDOT project manager oversees the activities detailed in the agreement. Approved exchanges are transacted in the year federal-aid funds are available. Funds are used on other federal-eligible projects. Eligible funding categories include STP Non-urban (Rural), STP Small Urban, and STP Urban. The exchange is $.85 state funds for each dollar of federal funds. Local governments are required to match 10 percent of total project costs. If a flexible match is offered, the details will be included in the agreement with value not to exceed UDOT average prices.
Page 148
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Safe Routes to Schools FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The SRTS Program funds programs, tools and infrastructure projects that support a safe walking or riding environment for children traveling to and from neighborhood schools.
Programmed funding 2016: $.5 million 2017 proposed: $.5 million 2018 proposed: $.5 million 2019 proposed: $.5 million
CONTACT
Cherissa Olson 801 965-4486 cmolsen@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT announced 7 SRTS projects. Since 2007, 69 projects have been funded including infrastructure improvements and activities Since 2009, over 140 thousand students at 249 schools have enjoyed Snap Walk n’ Roll Since 2009, more than 25 thousand students have walked or biked to school at least three times per week during September Since August 2015, the Walking School Bus app has facilitated 217 active walking groups. Since its launch in 2014, UDOT has tracked over 67 thousand miles walked, 2.2 million tons of emissions saved, and over 88 thousand school trips reduced by using the app to walk to school.
Utah Governor Gary Herbert walks to school with kids during a Walk More in Four event last fall.
Programs include: The Student Neighborhood Access program • SNAP on-line mapping software lets schools create and distribute maps that show the safest walking and biking routes. New software lets schools complete safe routing plans more easily. • The Walk More in Four event that encourages students in Kindergarten through eighth grade to walk or bike safely to school. • Snap, Walk ‘n Roll Assemblies are free to schools and teach students bicycle and pedestrian safety and how to stay safe around road work • UDOT’s Walking School Bus App that creates route plans and alerts parents when students have arrived at school Crossing Guard Training: The UDOT Crossing Guard Fundamentals DVD and Quick Reference are aids to law enforcement agencies who have the responsibility to train crossing guards.
Infrastructure Projects: Improvements, such as sidewalks, paved trails and installed bike racks are eligible for funding.
Fund Code: TAP
Page 149
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 151
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Federal and Combined Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Signs and Culverts FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $3 million Program ends after 2016
CONTACT
Region Program Managers & John Thomas 801 965-4150 jthomas@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS UDOT Region Two replaced signs in th Salt Lake City area in 2014-15.
Federal National Highway Performance Program and Highway Safety Improvement Program funding will help UDOT improve signs and culverts. SIGNS: Freeway signs provide direction and clarity for road users. Federal funding will help UDOT replace overhead signs in on critical travel and corridors in Salt Lake County.
CULVERTS: Effective drainage systems rely on functioning culverts to preserve safety and to keep pavement healthy. Malfunctioning culverts can cause hazardous conditions to develop suddenly, and can cause pavement or the road base to erode over time. Federal funding will allow UDOT to focus on improving badly distorted or corroded culverts.
Region Two had many pipe lining projects in 2014. Region Four has used this funding to improve culverts. Region One will have many culvert projects in the construction phase in Davis, Weber and Box Elder Counties during 2016.
Signs and culverts are important roadway assets that support safety and mobility. UDOT has been collecting roadway asset information in order to identify the signs and culverts that need to be replaced. Projects will be integrated with other road work. UDOT Regions will help prioritize project selection. In 2012, UDOT completed a four-year project to collect baseline culvert data on over 30 thousand cross-cut culverts that direct water off of pavement. Most UDOT culverts are in good condition but some are in need of rehabilitation or replacement. The statewide culvert condition data is accessible online via a central database at UDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Map Center.
Fund Code: 11903 (culverts), 11904 (signs)
Page 152
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Contingency Funds FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funds per region: 2016: $1 million 2017 proposed: $1 million 2018 proposed: $1 million 2019 proposed: $1 million
Contingency Funds are provided to UDOT regional offices and UDOT Central Program Development to assist local areas with unanticipated, critical or emergency needs. Projects are conducted in partnership with local governments and are intended to meet needs associated with the state highway system. Most projects are small and include improving drainage, repairing and optimizing signals or improving safety on a pedestrian facility. Each region receives $1 million each state fiscal year with the remaining funds to be used by the Program Development Engineer.
CONTACT
Region Program Managers and William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Region Four Contingency Fund project examples: Wildlife collision mitigation at various locations, San Juan County project partner Hurricane City Drainage Agreement, SR-9, Hurricane City project partner Electrocrete mat, US-89, UDWR and BLM project partners Curb and gutter on US-89; milepost 164.86 to 164.9, Junction Town project partner Curb and gutter on US-89, milepost 157-158, Circleville Town project partner Turn lanes at Salina Industrial Park, SR-24, Sevier County and Salina City project partners Ferron Creek rip-rap project, UDWR project partner
A curb and gutter project on U.S. 89 in Junction
PIN: 5599, 5589 5597, 5591 Funding Code: ST_CONT_R#
Page 153
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Alternative Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Jurisdictional Transfers FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $.8 million 2017: $.3 million 2018: $.3 million 2019: $.3 million
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
Jurisdictional Transfer Funds are used to assist with physical improvements deemed necessary on the roadway before a transfer is completed, or they may be included as a part of the transfer agreement. State Law: 72-4-102. Additions to or deletions from state highway system -Designation of highways as state highways between sessions. (1) (a) The Legislature may add to or delete highways or sections of highways from the state highway system. (b) The department shall annually submit to the Legislature a list of highways or sections of highways the commission recommends for addition to or deletion from the state highway system.
Some recent Jurisdictional Transfers:
Utah Administrative Rule:
A portion of SR 107 in West Point City was deleted from the State Highway System and transferred to West Point City. UDOT paid a one-time lump sum of $130 thousand to help West Point City to maintain the roadway.
92
129
146
296
Utah County exchanged North County Boulevard for a portion of SR 146 and a $3.3 million lump sum to be used for future maintenance. North County Boulevard is now SR-129.
74
89
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Region Four and Helper City recommended a jurisdictional transfer of ownership from the State to Helper City on SR-244, MP 0.189 to MP 0.91. UDOT will pay Helper City $750,000 to take ownership, based on ten years of maintenance and roadway improvement costs.
180
R926. Transportation, Program Development. R926-2. Evaluation of Proposed Additions to or Deletions from the State Highway System. Purpose of the rules is to establish the following: (1) a process for a highway authority to propose additions to or deletions from the state highway system; (2) a procedure for evaluating requested additions to or deletions from the state highway system; and (3) a set of criteria by which proposed changes shall be consistently evaluated.
§ ¦ ¨ 15
Transfer to Local Jurisdiction The route marked SR-146 in redto be shows former SRNew State Route 129 146, which was transferred to Uinta County’s jurisdiction. The route marked in blue shows new Exhibit 'A' SR 129.
PIN: 6672 Fund Code: ST_HWY_TRNSF
November '14
Page 154
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Public Communication Efforts FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2016: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand 2017 proposed: $ 645 thousand
Communication programs improve safety and mobility by providing messages, real-time traffic information, and construction updates so road users can make wise travel choices.
CONTACT
Joseph Walker 385 223-5233 josephwalker@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS A growing number of followers receive traffic, construction, weather and safety messages on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram. UDOT launched the “Monday Messages” overhead VMS safety campaign. Popular messages included “That seat belt looks good on you,” “Turn signals: the original instant message” and “Get your head out of your apps.” Media outreach resulted in more than 2,000 stories, including the South Davis I-15 opening, new lanes on The Point, new VMS “Message Monday” campaign, new snow plow tracker on the UDOT Traffic app and the innovative conveyor belt bridge over I-15 at the Point of the Mountain. UDOT launched “Heads Up,” a Zero Fatalities campaign aimed at protecting pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists.
UDOT’S John Gleason on camera. Communication programs provide useful information to help road users make good travel decisions.
UDOT Traffic website and smart phone app: Provides live cameras, real-time traffic conditions, and statewide construction information. Special messages are integrated to communicate with diverse audiences. Media Relations: Media coverage prior to major construction-related closures or long-term traffic impacts helps optimize mobility and showcase helpful innovations such as new intersection designs or variable speed limit signs. TravelWise Outreach: Promoting trip reduction strategies like teleworking, carpooling or taking public transit, helps road users avoid delays, save energy, and help benefit air quality. New TravelWise Alerts, provided through the UDOT Traffic app, urge drivers to reduce trips during bad air quality days or major weather events. Zero Fatalities Campaign: Messages attack drowsy driving, distracted driving, aggressive driving, impaired driving and not buckling up, through powerful TV and radio ads, public events, websites, driver education classes and media coverage.
ePM Master PIN: 8922 Fund Code: ST_PR
Page 155
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
State Park Access FUNDING
Federal year: October 1 State year: July 1
The State Park Access Program provides state matching funds for projects on local roads that provide access to state parks.
Programmed funding 2016: $500 thousand 2017 proposed: $500 thousand 2018 proposed: $500 thousand 2019 proposed: $500 thousand
CONTACT
Chris Potter 801 965-4403 cpotter@utah.gov
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Millsite State Park Access, Emery County project sponsor. Escalante State Park and Kodachrome Basin State Park Access Roads, Garfield County project sponsor.
The Grand Parade formation at Kodachrome State Park.
Municipalities may apply to the Joint Highway Committee for state funds to make necessary improvements and repairs. Participation in the program requires local governments to provide half of project funding. Improving access to state parks helps support the tourism industry in Utah. State parks benefit the state by: • Generating $9.85 in local economic impact for every $1 of general fund appropriation • Generating $67 million in state economic benefit through day-use, camping and golf • Paying $11.2 million to individual counties in 2010 property tax for off-highway vehicles and boats • Collecting and paying more than million in state and local taxes to counties and communities For more information on the economic benefits of state parks, see www. stateparks.utah.gov
Funding Code: ST_PK_ACCESS
Page 156
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 157
State Park Access Program Reg
County
Route
BMP
EMP
PIN
3
WASATCH
3128P
0
2
10886
3 4 4
WASATCH EMERY WASHINGTON
3128P 0303P
0 0 0
2 2 0
12947 13889 10888
Project Location PIN Description Cnty:FA-3132; MP .00 - 7.51 & Cnty:FA-3128; MP .00 - 1.69 & Wasatch State Park Access Road Surfacing, Phase Wasatch State Park Access Road 1 Cnty:FA-3128; MP .00 - 1.69 & Cnty:FA-3132; MP 6.62 - 7.51 & Wasatch Mtn. State Park Access Rd., Guardsman Pass in Wasatch Wasatch Mtn. State Park Access Rd., Guardsman County Pass SR-303; MP .00 - 1.77 & Cnty:FA-1650; MP .00 - 5.86 & Cnty:FA-1636Goblin Valley/Millsite State Parks Chip Seal Entrance to Snow Canyon State Park Snow Canyon State Park Access Road
Project Value
Planned Year
$
1,400,000
2017
$ $ $
1,000,000 1,127,000 400,000
2019 2016 2018
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 159
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Alternative Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Utah State Infrastructure Bank FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding 2014 Capitalized total: $23.5 million 2016 Uncommitted Balance Available: zero
The Utah State Infrastructure Bank provides loans and credit enhancement to local government or private sponsors of transportation or transit projects. The loans hep state agencies leverage federal and non-federal transportation funds, assist local areas to develop facilities, and promote public-private partnerships. Loans can offer advantages over only grant-based funding by allowing project delivery to be accelerated by and helping local governments complete a financial plan.
CONTACT
The fixed-rate, low-interest loans are tied to the State of Utah bonding rate and term length. Repayment must be completed no more than ten years from the time the loan is executed. No one entity may borrow more than twenty five percent of the fund.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The Utah Transportation Commission has the authority to approve all qualified requests and loan terms. SIB loans can augment other project funding.
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
St. George City, Logan City and Washington City have recently completed loans. Fountain Green City West Jordan City and Cedar City currently have outstanding loans and projects are underway. Vineyard City has recently been approved for a loan.
The fund is a revolving account that does not deplete. Prior to 2012, the fund was capitalized at $4 million, including interest. House Bill 377, which passed in the 2012 legislative session, added $20 million to the account.
Project example: Cedar City obtained a SIB loan to augment other funding to improve the South Cedar Interchange
SIB funds helped Cedar City complete a much needed project on I-15: 1-3, new ramps,a DDI, realignment and new profile of Cross Hollow Road; 4-5, the old flyover was saved for a pedestrian and livestock crosswalk and surplus property was utilized, and 6, the interchange area was landscaped.
PL_CMPO PL_DMPO
Page 160
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
Alternative Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Permanent Community Impact Board CONTACT
Candace Powers CIB Program Manager Utah Department of Workforce Services 801 468-0131 cpowers@utah.gov
Utahâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Permanent Community Impact Board provides grants and loans to mitigate damage to public facilities caused by mineral extraction or development on federal lands. Funding for the grants and loans comes from lease royalties that are returned to state government from mineral extraction industries. Government agencies and political subdivisions are eligible to apply. Grant and loan amounts are generally limited to $5 million. Eligible activities include reconstruction, construction and planning, study and design with a 50 percent funding match. Applicants cannot use in-kind funds as local matching funds unless that participation has a demonstrable value such as real property. Donated staff or labor cannot be used as local matching funds. Funded projects must include public participation, including notification of intent to seek CIB funding or financing and a formal public hearing to receive comment on the size and scope of the project.
CIB FUNDING CYCLE
Page 161
UDOT FUND FACT SHEETS
State Funds
Program Development & STIP Spring 2016
Region Concept Development FUNDING
State year: July 1 Programmed funding per region: 2016: $150 thousand 2017 proposed: $150 thousand 2018 proposed: $150 thousand 2019 proposed: $150 thousand
CONTACT
William Lawrence 801 964-4468 billlawrence@Utah.gov
The Region Concept Development program allocates funding to the each of the four UDOT Regions to study and develop a practical scope, schedule, budget, and list of potential risks for future projects. These studies are normally completed for major construction projects, including reconstruction, choke point, and passing lanes. Following the April Transportation Commission meeting, each region begins identifying projects for the next Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Workshop. Each Region is allocated $100,000 to complete concept reports that reflect a practical budget, scope and summary of risks for the purpose of project selection.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015 Region Four Concept Development project examples: US-191; Peterâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Hill Slide, $100 thousand SR-143; Culvert Replacement at milepost 3.6, $15 thousand I-15; Brigham Road to Dixie Drive, $15 thousand I-15; SR-9 to Washington Parkway, south bound auxiliary lane, $15 thousand
The Region Concept Development program allocates funding to each of the four UDOT Regions.
PIN: 8752, 8754, 8756, 8758 Funding Code: ST_REG#_CONC_D
Page 162
Utah Department of Transportation 2016 STIP Workshop
PROJECTS
Page 163
UTAH DEPARTMENT
OF
TRANSPORTATION
2016 STIP Workshop