Try Anything: Newark Police ride-along See page 21
Santa Fe applies to extend liquor license See page 5
Hens move to No. 1 with win over UMass See page 27
The University of Delaware’s Independent Newspaper Since 1882
Check out the website for breaking news and more.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010 Volume 137, Issue 12
Union protests university’s construction project BY MARINA KOREN Managing News Editor
Members of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Union 626 stood behind a large white sign that read “Shame on the University of Delaware” at the intersection of South College Avenue and Delaware Avenue, passing out fliers to passersby about the university’s construction projects.
“We’re out here because we’re trying to uphold the wage and benefits standards that we have established in this area,” said Benny Johnson, of Clayton, Del., a representative of the union. “And we believe the University of Delaware is helping to destroy it.” The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Union 626 is a private company and trade union located in New Castle, Del. Late last week and Monday, union members distributed fliers describing
the university’s construction of the new facility East Campus Utility Plant Project, located near Academy Street and Lovett Avenue. According to the fliers, the university has hired an out-ofstate contractor that according to the protestors, pays their carpentry employees wages and benefits that are substantially less than the area labor standards for carpenters working in Delaware. The fliers also listed the yearly
salaries of university President Patrick Harker and Executive Vice President Scott Douglass and stated: “Why do people like Mr. Harker and Mr. Douglass think it’s OK for them to earn this kind of pay while supporting the destruction of area standards for local workers by allowing out-ofstate contractors […] to work on their projects?” The flier continued, “Maybe Mr.
See LABOR page 10
THE REVIEW/Megan Krol
Union members protest Thursday.
Adderall: concentration comes with consequences
Professors’ free speech protected
BY ALEXANDRA DUSZAK
Staff Reporter
BY CHRIS MEIDANIS
Executive Editor
It’s 10 p.m., the night before Julia’s accounting final. The university junior has had five other exams this week, and zero time to study. There’s only one way for her to learn all the information she needs for her exam, but staying up all night seems impossible—at least until she reaches into her purse for a small, blue pill. She pops it in her mouth. Within 30 minutes, her brain’s neural circuits are on fire. She’s completely focused on her textbook, and will remain so for several more hours. “You just get zoned in on whatever you’re doing,” Julia says. “Anything that you’re studying is just way more interesting than it would be normally. I’m like, ‘Oh, this isn’t terrible at all,’ even if it’s like statistics or accounting. It’s just easier to focus on it, get it all done without straying from it.” The feeling Julia describes is the result of Adderall, a drug that aids in concentration. In recent years, college students have hailed Adderall a “wonder drug” and have turned to it as a study aid at an unprecedented rate. A 2007 study from the University of Michigan’s Substance Abuse Research Center
See ADDERALL page 22
1 News
business major. She had initially gone to Japan to study, but she and her father later decided that attending an American university would provide her with more educational opportunities. “I was in Japan, but Japanese university is very hard to enter but easier to graduate,” Cai said. “It’s opposite in America, it’s easier to enter, but hard to graduate, but I want to enter the university first, as soon as possible, so I come here.” According to a census of international students conducted
In response to recent federal and Supreme Court decisions that have challenged academic freedom and First Amendment rights of professors, the university Faculty Senate finalized a new amendment to its handbook at an Oct. 4 meeting in an effort to protect the free speech of university professors. The amendment revised ambiguous language regarding free speech, giving faculty the right to freely address any matter, institutional policy or action of the administration. The revised policy now covers faculty governance, an aspect of academic freedom that allows professors to speak freely when discussing policies or changes in faculty or administrative structure. “We now have a policy that’s as strong as any I’ve seen at any university,” said Jan Blits, chairperson of the Committee on Faculty Welfare and Privileges within the Faculty Senate. “Faculty governance is now broadly stated so that any forum in which I voice an opinion or anyone else voices an opinion on university matters would be protected.” Blits said there is a widening gap between administrators
See STUDENTS page 11
See FREEDOM page 11
THE REVIEWNicole Becker
Cho Cho Cai (right), Ji Cong Wang (center) and Ai Zhong prepare for their Japanese class in Gore Hall. The students are part of a growing trend of international students coming to the university.
Int’l enrollment doubles BY NICOLE BECKER Entertainment Editor
Freshman Cho Cho Cai sits with three other Chinese students waiting for her Japanese class to begin. She is smiling and her hands are gesturing with animation as her voice rattles off in a foreign tongue. She is confident and passionate as she speaks until she is approached by an American student asking her about the homework assignment. Her smile remains, but her hands instantly fall to her sides, and her eyes grow wide. She slowly selects each word and carefully
12 Editorial
13 Opinion
A look at UD’s international students: part 1 of 2 Coming next week: International students not fully integrated
pronounces each syllable as she formulates her response in English. “Page se-ven-ty six,” Cai said. “Yes. You are ver-y wel-come.” Cai came to the United States a year and a half ago to study at the English Language Institute before entering the university as a
17 Mosaic
21 Try Anything
26 Classifieds
27 Sports