DLS controversy - interviews pg 4-5, timclinc pg 5, opinions pg 20 Intcvicw ~";th Prof. Alaric "Mr. Lex Clean, pg. 14 Student Exchanges pg. 18-19 W.F. Walking's Life Advice for Young Men pg. 32
Law Games! See pages 16-17
VOLUME 8 ISSUE 4
JANUARY
16, 2007
WWW.ULTRAVIRES.CA
Students shocked by sudden resignations at DLS Actions of Executive Director, Student Executive Members and Dean called into question
like an overreaction to the situation." The resignations also came at the same time that review lawyers and McCormack were disputing a change made by McCormack over the method of g rading students in DLS credit program. After an unusuall} htgh number of credit students fruled to meet 'their mid-term requirements as assessed by the clime's re' Iew lawyers, \fcCormack, who is the course instructor, decided to re-assess the perSTEPIIE." ' BIR.\tA:-: formance of students in the class. i\lisener, Litkowski and Sherazee disOn November 21,2006, members of puted changes to their assessment the Do\\ ntown Legal Services (Dl..S) method and un~uc~.:cssfu\\y attempted to community were shocked by the sudden secure a joint meeting with McCormack
.rcsi~lations of two
long-serving criminal
review lawyers, Mary Misener and Richard IJtkowski. The resignations followed Dean Mayo Moran's cancellation of a scheduled meeting that .l\fisener, Litko\"ski, and a third review lawyer, L\mina Sherazee, had requested in order to discuss their concerns about the clinic. A public debate and exchange of letters followed as the two former review lawyers and Sherazee expressed "very grave concerns about the management of the chmc by the Executive Director Uudith McCormack]" in a November 24 letter to the DLS community. In the same letter, Misener, Litkowski and Sherazee claimed that "the Executive Director was systemically blocking repeated attempts by staff and students including the students on the Executive, to undertake a meaningful examination of the allocation of public resources in the clinic and the areas of law which we practice." McCormack says she was surprised by the resignations which she says "seemed
to discuss
their concerns. In
:1
complained and I thought there was nothing to it, I would have said 'sorry'. But I thought they were right." McCormack admits she turned down a request from the review lawyers for a joint meeting to discuss their concerns regarding the credtt program. "I didn't think we could have a reasonable dialogue that way. I didn't think there would be listening going on. I didn't think it would be an actual exchange. I suggested we meet individually and they refused to meet individually." As a result, Lttkowski, Misener and
Sherazee arranged a meeang with Dean \ioran. However, this meeting was cancelled only days beforehand by the Dean in a letter sent to each of the three review la\\1·ers. Litkowski, Misener and Sherazee claim they were told therein that they would be contacted to attend individual meetings with the Dean and McCormack, "to ensure that DLS remains a professional working em ironment," and that the Dean expressed disapproval of their "unprofessional tone." 1\Iisener
DLS continued on pg.3
No,·cmber
6 letter addressed to McCormack and copied to Dean i\foran, 1\fisener, Litkowski and Sherazee obJected to the new policy Imposed after students had recei,·ed their mid-term reviews. They say in the letter that "the procedure [McCormack has] imposed has the effect of dissatisfied students reviewing review counsel in a disguised lowering of the standards br which we are to grade them. B} inviting the credit students to list their non substantive work for credit, you are advancing a fiction that we, review counsel, out of the blue, and out of orbit, for the first time, this year, erred in our as sessments. None of this conforms tore· ality." i\fcCormack says she intervened be cause "they assessed 90% of the class as being below requirements. That's a red flag if 90'Yo of the class is being assessed that way." She notes as the course instructor it was within her ambit to make these decisions, and says "if students had
U of T faculty of Law attends Law Games, throws things at students from rival schools. More on Law Games m our FULL COLOLR CENTRE
SPRF.AD!
YOURE ABOUT TO START YOUR
LAW CAREER LET'S TALK RETIREMENT. Consider OsJer, Hoskin & Harrourt UP. We ~ a premium on ment~g ~nd innovative training,~ Jv.v a canH' ~ &pnls vesy nllx:h m lnv tt ~·
OSLER.
I