Bouncing Back
Smoke and Mirrors
B1
Serious injuries not enough to slow down Austin Sikorski
B4
Stage II debuts student run theatrical production
THE STATESMAN
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2012
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH
WWW.UMDSTATESMAN.COM
Minnesota divided by marriage amendment Opposing sides stand strong as poll gap narrows BY KIM HYATT hyatt045@d.umn.edu
The battle over the marriage amendment has come a long way, but with less than six weeks left till Election Day, it’s still a toss-up whether the proposed marriage amendment will be added to Minnesota’s constitution or not. Currently, the state is split between supporters and opponents, according to a recent Star Tribune Minnesota poll. Of 800 likely Minnesota voters surveyed in that poll, 49 percent were in favor of the amendment, 47 percent against and 4 percent undecided.
Age and political party seem to be the two greatest demographic factors generating these percentages. Young people, ages 18-34, and Democrats are more likely to vote “no” than Republicans and those in older age groups, according to the recent Star Tribune poll. The debate can be looked at in terms of percentage, but numbers only say so much. One man’s “Vote Yes” yard sign and another woman’s “Vote No” house party gives a personal perspective to the marriage amendment. Stepping away from the big picture, such efforts of everyday people reflect what’s going on all across Minnesota.
KIM HYATT/STATESMAN
ALEX LEONE/STATESMAN
‘Yes’ voter’s sign vandalized BY KIM HYATT hyatt045@d.umn.edu
The streets of Duluth are full of color this time of year, and not simply because of leaf pigments changing. Political yard signs varying in color, candidate and party are widespread; you see them everywhere on every street. Some find common ground with others, seeing they have the same sign in their yard as someone else, and sometimes others see differences. “One night somebody drew some figures on it,” said John Weiske, living right off of College Street. “So, my wife just cut them out and we put it back out.” A neighbor to the UMD campus, Weiske has had the same “Vote Yes” sign in his yard this whole campaign. Despite the threat of damage, he continues to exercise his first amendment right by showing his support for the marriage amendment. “It’s on the ballot as an amendment so that the people would decide if marriage is between a man and a woman,” said Weiske. “Not a judge, not the Legislature. It really does put the freedom in the people’s hands to make that decision.”
Asking Legislature to place the amendment on the Nov. 6 ballot for the people to make that decision is Minnesota for Marriage, a coalition of leaders, both in and outside the religious community, who support the Minnesota marriage amendment. “Right now it’s state law,” Weiske said. “Marriage is between one man and one woman. So it (the amendment) is to protect that.” Currently, gay marriage is illegal in Minnesota. This is also the case in 38 other states that have statutory laws and/or constitutional provisions limiting marriage to one man and one woman, according to the National Conference of State Legislature. “My hope is that the amendment passes,” Weiske said. “But the thing is, with the amendment being on the ballot, if you don’t vote ‘yes’ it’s a ‘no’ vote.” Minnesota law requires any changes made to the Constitution have to surpass a majority of all ballots cast. This means that if a voter doesn’t answer the marriage amendment question when voting, they are counted as voting “no.” The proposed constitutional amendment will continue to gain supporters like Weiske, who hopes to still have the same “Vote Yes” yard sign come Nov. 6. His strategy is simple: “We put it away at night,” Weiske said. For more information on Minnesota for Marriage and voting “yes” go to: MinnesotaForMarriage.com.
‘No’ voters rally together BY KIM HYATT hyatt045@d.umn.edu
Across the Duluth Aerial Lift Bridge, one quaint home on Park Point invited the community in for an early afternoon party. This was just one of many houses that recently held parties throughout Minnesota to spark conversation about the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. “Our government is by the people, for the people,” said Laura Wedge, host of the party on Park Point. “The only way to fight this is with people talking to other people, standing up for what they believe and getting informed.” The amendment, which would define marriage in the state constitution as between a man and a woman, will be on the ballot for Minnesota and three other states in November. Minnesota United for All Families, a coalition of organizations as well as community and business leaders working to defeat the marriage amendment, held its third and final One Day United campaign and fundraiser. Minnesota United set a goal of opening 300 houses to the public
to talk about voting “no” on the marriage amendment. Together, the One Day United parties hoped to attract thousands of Minnesotans, and Wedge’s gathering was just one among many. On One Day United, families gathered alongside other families, spreading Minnesota United’s mission that marriage belongs to all people. “We want this equality,” said Taylor Moore, a junior at the University of Minnesota Duluth. “This is truly important and best for everyone.” Moore attended another One Day United party in Duluth, sharing with community members her story of being an ally. Even though she was the only student attending the party, she was happy to make the connection with others voting “no.” “It was really nerve-racking being the youngest one there,” Moore said. “But it was nice to close the generation gap.” To see where other parties were held throughout Minnesota on One Day United, or to find out more information about the Minnesota United campaign, go to: MnUnited.org.
Students line UMD Parking partially funds ‘free’ bus transit program up for free tickets BY JOSHUA MACVEY macve004@d.umn.edu
BY ANNE KUNKEL CHRISTIANSON kunke062@d.umn.edu
Spread out on a blanket in the middle of the floor by the lower level bookstore, Rachael Jutsen can’t wait for 10am. “I’ve been sitting here for fifteen…fifteen and a half hours,” said Justesen, a freshman at UMD. She is just one of hundreds of students who lined up Tuesday morning for Timeflies concert tickets. An even put on by the Kirby Program Board. see FREE CONCERT, A3
INDEX:
With parking permits sold out, UMD student Ian Lundquist plugs the parking meter. What he doesn’t know: he’s paying part of the funds for other students to ride the bus. UMD Parking Services funds part of the U-PASS, a collaborative effort between the University and the Duluth Transit Authority (DTA) that enables students to use public-trans free of charge. But it’s not free. For the 2011 academic year, UMD paid the DTA $360,000 to cover student, faculty and staff bus fares. Parking services covered $125,000 of that—more than a third of the total price. This year, the price jumps to $400,000, and parking services will cover the same amount.
News: A1 - A4 |
Translation: those who park on campus partly subsidize the Public Trans for those who don’t. “I don’t live on a bus line, and I’m far from school,” said Lundquist. “Why am I paying the toll to ride a bus I don’t ride?” “We know not all students can take the bus,” said Patrick Keenan, Director of Student Life. “The funding isn’t to penalize them, but rather to encourage those who don’t need cars to use the transportation available to them.” And the DTA provides that transportation. They’re “contractually obligated through the spring semester of 2017,” wrote Tom Elwell, DTA Marketing Director. “It’s UMD’s strategy to encourage use of public transportation and restrict cheap parking on campus.” As U-PASS ridership reached a record 569,361—as much as 20% of all DTA ridership in the academ-
“That is kind of weird. I feel that if you’re going to use something you should pay for it... There should be a flat fee.”
“It’s pretty sweet. I ride the bus. I’m free riding off the system.”
- Garret Copeland, Senior
- John Quiring, Sophomore
ic year—the program has proved itself a large player in both student and community life. “Riding the bus not only relieves congestion on campus,” said Keenan. “It also contributes to a reduction in energy use, environmental impact, and the costs associated with the use of personal vehicles.” Yet the student response to its funding is mixed. “You’re paying to park at the Duluth campus,” said UMD stu-
Opinion: A5 - A6 | Sports: B1 - B2 | Outdoors: B3 | Student Life: B4 - B5
dent Warren Olinger. “The money going to funding transportation for other students is a good allocation of revenue.” “I agree with the idea that we should encourage students to use other means of getting to school,” said Christian Pezzutto, a junior at UMD. “I’m just not entirely sure about the means by which we’re encouraging it.” see UMD PARKING, A3