FINANCING THE RECOVERY

Page 86

The UNDP effort in Indonesia to channel Zakat funds to local SDG projects is a good example that could be extended to other countries. Zakat is a 2.5 percent mandatory welfare tax, payable by all eligible Muslims who have earnings above a certain threshold. It is a cash contribution to the poor, which could represent an important source of SDG finance. UNDP partnered with Indonesia’s National Board of Zakat (‘BAZNAS’), the official body that disburses the Islamic contribution in Indonesia, to channel Zakat funds to renewable energy, disaster recovery and local economic development projects in underserved communities. Indonesia is the first country that has tapped into this potential of Zakat. In Bangladesh in January 2012, UNDP signed a memorandum of understanding with the Center for Zakat Management to explore different financing tools with a focus on Zakat, but so far, no specific results have been reported.

5.5 International public finance and private capital tools Climate and green finance Finding 15. UNDP support to climate financing is delivered through a number of tracks and tools, including budget tagging, green bonds and global climate fund projects. However, clear alignment with the goals and targets of the Strategic Plan is weak, including financing for access to energy. UNDP has considerable experience in delivering projects that de-risk and crowd-in financing for investments on climate action. Working in partnership with global climate funds such as the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Green Climate Fund (GCF), UNDP has assisted Governments in the design and implementation of projects that aim to reduce commercial risks through blended finance, public finance and regulatory policies. UNDP was among the first of the entities accredited by the GCF. It secured approval from the GCF Board for what was the second GCF-funded project in 2015, the first year of its operation. Since then, UNDP has acted as the GCF implementing partner for 35 projects (with a total value of S$2.4 billion).177 This reflects the comparative advantage arising from the strong country presence and operating systems of UNDP, as well as the organization’s ability to provide technical support for project development and implementation.178 The GCF is mandated to allocate half of its financing commitments (currently $10 billion) to mitigation and half to adaptation, with a strong focus on the most vulnerable countries. UNDP is well placed to build on its current portfolio of managed projects. There may be wider opportunities to build on the portfolio through adaptation projects. As noted in section 5, international adaptation funding is set to double over the UNDP Strategic Plan period to 2025, with donors allocating an additional $20 billion.179 It is likely that a significant share of the new finance will flow through vertical funds such as the Adaptation Fund and the Least Developed Countries Fund (managed by the GEF). According to data compiled by the OECD, UNDP delivered around 2 percent of the $170 billion in ODA commitments between 2010 and 2018 flagged as having climate change adaptation as a significant or principal objective.180 In Benin, it is reported that UNDP is supporting the national GCF-accredited entity (the National Fund for Environment and Climate) with the aim of building a pipeline of bankable projects, a model that has much wider potential.

177 178 179

180

As of 30 September 2021, the GCF Board had approved 191 projects, 23 of which have been processed under the simplified approval process aimed at supporting small-scale projects. UNDP Independent Evaluation Office, Evaluation of UNDP support for climate change adaptation, IEO, New York, December 2020. Anyaogu, Isaac, ‘Rich countries publicly commit to raise adaptation finance, privately they dither’, Earth Journalism Network, 8 November 2021, https://earthjournalism.net/stories/cop-26-rich-countries-publicly-commit-to-raise-adaptation-financeprivately-they-dither, accessed 29 March 2022. OECD.Stat, ‘Creditor reporting system’, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=crs1, accessed November 2021.

CHAPTER 5. THE UNDP FINANCING TOOLKIT

70


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

7.2 Recommendations and management response

25min
pages 100-112

7.1 Conclusions

13min
pages 95-99

5.5 International public finance and private capital tools

23min
pages 86-94

Box 8. The SDG investor mapping process in Rwanda

2min
page 85

Box 7. ESG standard-setting agencies

7min
pages 82-84

Box 6. An illustration of the management approach for bond issuers

2min
page 81

Box 3. The Benin SDG bond

4min
pages 64-65

Box 4. The example of the Armenian Government’s Budget Circular for 2020

11min
pages 75-78

5.3 Domestic resource mobilization

8min
pages 72-74

Box 5. Tax Inspectors without Borders in Uganda

2min
page 79

5.4 Private capital attraction tools

2min
page 80

5.1 The SDG financing strategy and implementation architecture

10min
pages 66-69

4.7 Sustainability bonds demonstrate the potential for SDG-related financing

5min
pages 62-63

Table 2. UNDP COVID-19 budget utilization, 2020 and 2021, as of November 2021

4min
pages 42-43

Figure 10. Countries spending more on debt servicing than health in 2021

1min
page 52

4.5 International public finance – aid and multilateral institutions

8min
pages 58-60

4.3 Aligning finance with SDG purpose

6min
pages 55-56

Figure 9. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on fiscal and gross domestic product forecasts

2min
page 51

4.4 Domestic resource mobilization and public spending

2min
page 57

Box 2. The experience of Armenia in developing its socioeconomic impact assessment

7min
pages 46-48

Figure 4. The UNDP COVID-19 response in 2020

4min
pages 39-40
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.