No. 27 May 3, 2012

Page 1

Congratulations 2012 graduates!

The University News Final issue of the 2011-2012 academic year.

Celebrating 90 Years as a Student Voice of Saint Louis University

Vol. XCI No. 27

unewsonline.com

Thursday, May 3, 2012

A NEW RIVAL JOINS A-10

SUMMER FLICKS

Butler joins the Atlantic 10 Conference >> SPORTS

Check out the newest movies to hit theaters >> ARTS

Commencement speaker revealed Father James Martin, S.J. will share lightness and laughter in May 19 address By JONATHAN ERNST Editor-in-Chief

As students prepare their last assignments for the semester, one Jesuit priest prepares to lighten the mood. Father James Martin, S.J. will deliver his message of lightness and laughter to the Saint Louis University class of 2012 at this year’s Commencement ceremony at Chaifetz Arena on Saturday, May 19 at 9 a.m. “It is important that we go out into the world and make sure that we don’t take ourselves too seriously,” Martin said. “I am going to invite the graduates to lighten up a little bit.” Martin is the culture edi-

tor of America magazine and is a best-selling author of many books including his latest title “Between Heaven and Mirth: Why Joy, Humor and Laughter are at the Heart of the Spiritual Life.” SLU approached Martin earlier this semester offering him to address their graduates. Martin will also receive an honorary degree during the ceremony. “SLU is such a prestigious institution, it made it a delight to accept the offer to speak,” Martin said. While Martin plans to address the graduates with some “Jesuit jokes” and humor, he is mainly interested in meeting people “where they are at.” Martin is able to reach his

followers by using social media. He constantly updates his social media pages with prayers, article links and religious news. “Like Jesus, we have to go out and meet people where they are,” Martin said. “Jesus spoke to his followers in ways they could understand and that is why it is important to use media and popular culture to meet younger audiences where they are at.” Martin is a frequent commentator in the national and international media including appearances on Fox TV’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” PBS’s “The Newshour with Jim Lehrer,” Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” the History Channel and the Vatican Ra-

dio. After graduating from the University of Pennsylvania in 1982, Martin worked in corporate finance for six years. Martin found himself “miserable” and decided to enter the Society of Jesus. “The Ignatius idea of finding God in all things really spoke to me and joining the Jesuits ended up being the best decision of my life,” Martin said. Martin said he would make his commencement address short, focusing on the advice that he has to give to the graduates. “It is important that you don’t try to be someone other than who you are. You don’t need to become someone else to be holy,” Martin said.

By WOLF HOWARD Staff Writer

Coutresy of Father James Martin, S.j.

Father James Martin, S.J. will address the class of ‘12 on May 19 at Chaifetz.

One year later: Evaluating the Oath Spring 2010: A number of biased incidents on SLU's campus spur students to demand a greater awareness of diversity issues July 2010: Planning group formed, the Oath of Inclusion begins to take shape April 19, 2011: Oath of Inclusion launched to the SLU community Fall 2011: In it's first full semester of existence, the Oath of Inclusion is promoted to the freshman class, prospective students, and the upperclassmen

Minghao Gao / Senior Staff Photographer

Current Student Government Association Vice President of Diversity and Social Justice Kripa Sreepada influenced the development of the Oath of Inclusion. Sreepada has continued to stress the merits of inclusion and diversity at SLU.

Spring 2012: Planning begins for the sustainability of the Oath, including working with facets of SLU's campus directly impacted by the Oath, including disabilities services and services for pregnant and parenting student.

By KRISTEN MIANO Associate News Editor

“We, as students, form a diverse and vibrant university community.” So states the first line of the Oath of Inclusion, a document and project launched a year ago with the intent of taking a step toward building an inclusive community at Saint Louis University . Though the Oath officially is only a year old, its history extends back to the Spring of 2010. “The whole concept of it began after all the bias incidents that occurred in spring of 2010,”said Vice President of Diversity and Social Justice, Kripa Sreepada, “Our community felt extremely broken. One of the demands that came out of that was that we create a kind of statement of commitment from the students and the university to combating discrimination and prejudice.” The bias incidents that took place in 2010 led to an outcry from students to see something change. In response, the Student Government Association at the time began work on the Oath of Inclusion that summer, pulling students from SGA, various diversity organizations on campus and students who had been impacted by the bias incidents to come together and piece together a document written by

students, for students. “We didn’t want an administrative document because it was more of a student issue, we felt,” Sreepada said, “What made it stronger was that it was comprised of different outlooks and different perspectives on inclusion.” Sreepada recalled that the group went through draft after draft of the document, often holding twohour meetings during which everything from ideology to grammar was debated. Eventually, a statement was decided upon and, after some administrative feedback, the Oath of Inclusion was launched to the SLU community on April 19, 2010. Since then, the promotion of the Oath has all but exploded across SLU’s campus. “The impact that the Oath of Inclusion has made is really impressive,” said Assistant Vice President of Student Development, Ray Quirolgico. “The Oath of Inclusion has been introduced and discussed with prospective students and families in Admission visitation programs, it has been included into SLU 101, into Welcome Week and into University 101 classes. The Oath is discussed in campus programs about diversity and inclusion and in intergroup dialogue.

The Oath is now visibly placed near entrances to many offices and campus buildings. I have also really enjoyed seeing the “Live The Oath” buttons in different languages appear on the clothing and bags of students that I pass around campus.” Spreepada states that the target audience of the Oath is all of SLU, but a large portion of the efforts have been aimed at the freshmen, as they are just beginning their tenure at SLU and have significant potential to build the Oath. “It’s a bit harder to get the attention of the upperclassmen after they are done with their first year, as you don’t have those moments when you’re with everyone in your class,” Sreepada said, “But we have the plaques and we have the videos that depict how upperclassmen live the Oath, so their peers can see how others are living it out.” The struggle to engage the upperclassmen has not been the only challenge. SGA Chief of Staff and VP of Diversity and Social Justice elect, Sean Worley, said another worry is keeping the Oath relevant. “It’s easy to see the impact on first-year students, See “Oath” on Page 2

Wellness Fee Committee formed to allocate funds for wellness initatives By WOLF HOWARD Staff Writer

On February 15, Student Government Association voted to create the Wellness Committee, an entirely new body of SGA with the goal of increasing student wellness campus-wide. The Wellness Committee will be in charge of the funds SGA receives from the Wellness Fee, though the committee is merely a governing body in what is meant to be a program spearheaded by student engagement. The Wellness Fee is a $90-per-semester fee that ev-

ery undergraduate student pays as part of enrollment in a semester of classes. The Wellness Fee was created in January 2010 as a means to pay debt incurred by the creation of the Medical Center Outdoor Complex, renovations to Simon Recreation Center, and the Student Health and Counseling program, as well as funding “alcohol prevention programming and other wellness related initiatives,” according to Senate Bill 057-12. A portion of the fee, roughly $100,000, was also given to SGA yearly in order to promote student-based wellness programming.

Every year Chartered Student Organizations apply for funding through SGA. The money that SGA allocates to each CSO is drawn from the Student Activity Fee, a charge of $55 a semester paid by every undergraduate. This amount was recently increased by $10 per semester by a referendum added to the SGA executive board elections held this year. In the past two years, SGA used the funds given to it by the Wellness Fee in order to provide extra money in the yearly funding process for Chartered Student Organizations. Citing the fact that

the Wellness Fee was never meant to support the Activity Fee and that a source of funding with the intent of promoting student wellness would benefit the SLU student body, SGA voted to create the Wellness Fee Committee. With the creation of the committee, the Wellness Fee money was separated entirely from the Activity Fee money. SGA Financial Vice President elect Elect Vidur Sharma will chair the Wellness Committee next year. According to SGA President elect Blake Exline, he and seven other senators or committee representatives will be voting members

SGA calls for ticket change

of the committee. There will also be a Student Wellness Fee Advisory Group, comprising the SGA president, financial vice-president and three other members appointed by the president. This advisory group will be made up of five administrators or faculty and five students, and this will be the body that votes on the allocation of all money from the wellness fee. “SGA will work with students to get them in touch with collaborations throughout the University and to ensure their initiative is See “Wellness” on Page 3

Five bills and three resolutions were passed in final Student Government Association senate meeting of the year. Voting opened with senate passing amendments to SGA bylaws in order to make them more consistent with current practices Senate passed a bill banning tickets from executive board elections. This means that the groups students have seen in past elections, such as Building Bridges last year and Limitless this year, will cease to be a part of the election process. Endorsements were also barred in the bill. Thus every student must run as an individual for any SGA executive board positions. Debate carried on for over an hour, with senators from both sides voicing strong opinions on the bill and the impact it would have on the student body and SGA. Those for the bill argued that tickets were unfair to students because they limited the election pool and made it harder for students to run due to the intimidation and influence of a ticket’s unified presence. They hoped that removing tickets would make elections more merit based, and would promote more student involvement in the election process. President-elect Blake Exline stood in opposition of the bill. The process felt rushed he said, and he believed that more research needed to be done and more time needed to be given to consider the implications of the bill. Other arguments against the bill were that tickets allowed an executive board to have a unified vision, and that removing tickets would have no positive impact on the student body. SGA sent out a survey with its mailer on Wednesday, April 30, with questions pertaining to student opinions on elections without tickets. SGA still hadn’t received the results by the debate. “The issue is not decided on yet,” President Matt Ryan said concerning the bill. Next bills concerning amendments to the SGA constitution were brought up. Most of the amendments were meant to make the constitution more concise, and 8 of the amendments were passed in an omnibus. An amendment concerning the function of the Black Student Alliance senator failed, with many senators arguing that the bill was incomplete, not stating clearly enough what the responsibilities of the BSA senator are. A bill attempting to absolve the Constitutional Review and Rules Committee failed due to concerns about investing too much power in in the Internal Affairs Committee. Following this, senate voted to pass three resolutions, meant to act as guidelines concerning the alterations made this year to funding and the wellness fee. Five left over funding bills were voted to pass in omnibus.

Blue the Billiken Graduation!!

Read and Recycle The University News prints on partially recycled paper.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.