September 27, 2012 (No. 5)

Page 1

U University News Thursday, September 27, 2012

the

Vol. XCV No. 5

unewsonline.com

A student voice of SLU since 1919

50 of 57 cast ‘yay’ vote on No Confidence By KRISTEN MIANO New Editor TJ KEELEY Managing Editor

John Schuler/ Photo Editor

Mark Kneupher (left) and Blake Exline (right) field s questions during the Student Governement meeting on Sept. 26

Faculty senate head, VP, field questions and chairs so they might also give feedback, Patankar said. The FSEC labeled the draft policy “irremediably This week’s Student flawed.” The SLU adminisGovernment Association tration withdrew the review meeting was highlighted proposal on Sept. 17 due to by appearances from Vice the harsh criticism it faced President of Academic Affrom various sources. fairs Manoj Patankar and Patankar announced Faculty Senate President that a blue ribbon commitMark Knuepfer concerning tee was being formed, at the recent controversy surthe behest of the Board of rounding Patankar’s faculty Trustees, with the intention review policy draft. of “developing better poliPatankar and Knuepfer cies and, more importantly, presented their respective communication processes.” sides of the story and fieldThe blue ribbon committee ed questions from students. is to include nominations Patankar consistently from students, faculty and emphasized issues with administrators. communication as the When queried by stusource of most of the condents as to why there was troversy between the facsuch backlash concerning ulty and administration at the review Saint Louis process proUniversity. posed, PaPatantankar called kar talked I don’t think the ad- it an issue of about various oppor- ministration has shown “ o p e r a t i n g from differtunities and initia- that our system has ent mental tives that failed... If anyone isn’t models” in terms of had taken place over doing their job, they’re what is important and the last supposed to be fired. how to comyear to enmunicate. sure SLU -Mark Kneupfer He also atfaculty was tributed engaged in some of the backlash to the process of drafting an hysteria. evaluation policy focused Knuepfer apparently on improving the perforagreed, and opened his premance of SLU professors sentation by saying, “On alin educational effectivemost everything we have a ness and research. There different point of view.” were multiple open forums He defended the FSEC held in the spring of 2012. claim of fundamental Three faculty-administrator changes in the policy becommittees were formed tween their conversations and worked over multiple with Patankar and its premonths on recommendasentation to the faculty by tions for a new policy. pointing out that they were He also pointed out that discussing proposals until post-tenure review is not a the committee voted to renew concept, citing top-50 move them entirely. schools with similar poli“I don’t think the admincies: the list included Washistration has shown that our ington University, Rice Unisystem has failed,” Knuepversity and Vanderbilt. fer said. He pointed out that According to Patankar, there are already policies in he asked for feedback about place that allow the adminhis review policy from the istration to remove faculty Faculty Senate Executive that are severely underperCommittee (FSEC) by Sept. forming. 30. The Senate planned for “If anybody isn’t doing the Faculty Academic Aftheir job, they’re supposed fairs Committee to hold to be fired,” Knuepfer said. two meetings in September Knuepfer also stated that to go over the policy and recommended he release See “SGA” on Page 2 a draft to university deans

In the Faculty Senate Meeting on Sept. 25, the Senate took a vote on their confidence in the ability of Manoj Patankar, Vice President of Academic Affairs, to serve in his role. By a vote of 50 to 3, with four senators abstaining, the Senate took a vote of no confidence against Patankar. “After careful deliberation and with full understanding of the gravity of its actions, the Faculty Senate has voted no confidence in the leadership of the current Vice President for Academic Affairs and requests that the President begin the process of selecting a successor and carrying out

an orderly transition in that position, “the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate stated in a letter sent to Saint Louis University President Lawrence Biondi, S.J. on Sept. 26. The primary reasons cited by the Faculty Senate for the vote of no confidence included the proposed faculty review policies which violated the Faculty Manual; the evaluation procedures used to evaluate the College of Education and Public Service; inadequate response and leadership to issues remaining after the reorganization of the Graduate School; the complex procedures to gain approval for administrative activities such as hiring and sabbaticals; and a lack of consideration for faculty input and poor collaboration on vari-

ous matters, including the role and the goals of the Strategic Plan. The letter also said that should the University begin a search for a new leader for the Office of Academic Affairs, the Faculty Senate would be willing to work in collaboration to achieve the best possible outcome in an effort to promote the success of the University. During the Faculty Senate meeting, senators voiced their concerns with Patankar’s leadership and his collaboration with the faculty. Senators also worried about possible damage not only to faculty morale but the ability of the University to attract and retain effective professors. This vote comes after the College of Arts and Sciences Council voted no

confidence in Patankar on Sept. 18. The council then brought the vote to the Faculty Senate, which conducted the vote after some deliberation. The council also sent some comments and feedback to the Office of the President, expressing their concerns and reasons for their actions. On Sept. 24, the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Thomas Brouster, released a letter to all faculty, staff and students stating that at the Sept. 22 meeting of the Board, the Trustees unanimously affirmed their confidence not only in the President and his Vice Presidents, but also affirmed their approval of the University’s strategic planning efforts and its goal to See “Vote” on Page 3

Quarter century of progress

Biondi’s record: buildings,campus beautification

By WOLF HOWARD Associate News Editor

INSIDE:

NEWS

Bri Radici/ Design Director

Lawrence Biondi S.J. through the years. Biondi has been president of Saint Louis University for the last 25 years, making his tenure as president on of the longest in history. By KRISTEN MIANO News Editor

On Sept. 30, 1987, representatives from Saint Louis University and numerous other American institutions of higher education gathered in Powell Symphony Hall to attend the inauguration of SLU’s 31st president. When Lawrence Biondi, S.J., began his time as SLU’s president, he was 48 years old and had formerly been the Dean of Arts and

sing an aria from Il Trovatore or, better yet, La Traviata,” Biondi said. “For me, a lover of opera in particular and music in general, such is the stuff that dreams are made of.” “But then,” he continued. “So is becoming the President of Saint Louis University.” Twenty-five years later, Biondi is still living that dream. By the time Biondi succeeded Thomas Fitzgerald,

S.J. as the University’s president, he had already built a resume in academia approximately 15 years long. After receiving his Ph.D. in Socio-linguistics from Georgetown University in 1975, this Chicago native went on to become the chair of the Modern Language Department at Loyola University Chicago. Four years later, he became the dean of Loyola Chicago’s College of See “Biondi” on Page 3

SGA, administration tackles mailroom boondoggle By KATHERINE KELLIHER Staff Writer

Long lines outside of the mailroom are now a thing of the past. Due to technical difficulties, the Saint Louis University mail services was severely behind for the first few weeks of classes, also known as the ‘peak’ mail time as students are receiving textbooks and school supplies. These issues were then reported to Dr. Mona Hicks, dean of students. By Sept. 14, however, the management staff and Student Development were made aware of the dilemma and, by the following Monday, mail services was

2 OPINION

>> Meet SLU’s head wizard

Sciences at Loyola University Chicago. He opened his inaugural address not by speaking about his new position, but by disclosing his dream of being an opera singer. “No one named Biondi could stand spotlighted here at Centerstage in one of our nation’s premiere concert halls without becoming an Italian Walter Mitty, imagining you are all assembled in trembling expectation of hearing me

>> City sights to see

caught up to speed. In an e-mail sent to students on Sept. 17, the Dean’s office reported: “Due to the recent increase in mail and packages at this time of year, as well as technical issues, we recognize that students may have experienced a delay in receiving their mail. Please know that the Busch Student Center Student Mail Services is committed to getting mail to students in a timely manner. We are working diligently to address this issue.” According to Blake Exline, Student Government Association president, the See “Mail” on Page 3

4 ARTS

John Schuler/ Photo Editor

Students wait for packages in the Busch Student Center Mailroom

9 SPORTS

>> Forest Park’s Jazzfest

11

>> Graydon’s American dream


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.