The University News A Student Voice of Saint Louis University Since 1921
Thursday, October 21, 2010 unewsonline.com MOVING FORWARD
Vol. XC No. 9
Introducing the SLU SCOOP
Can SLU men’s basketball still go dancing on the hardwood? >>SPORTS
New weekly DPSSS blotter >>PAGE 2
Timeline of events Editor’s Note: To the best of our abilities, we have discussed and double checked with sources on campus and in the Midtown area to gather the following information.
Kicked off the court Mitchell’s future uncertain; Reed contemplates options
Friday, April 23
Thursday, May 6
St. Louis Circuit Attorney’s office will not press charges against Mitchell, Reed and a former player. According to a statement released by St. Louis Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, “there is insufficient evidence for us to bring charges against the suspects at this time. We will continue to seek additional information, and if circumstances change, we will reevaluate the matter.”
Tuesday, May 11 The academic year ends. Two of the players leave SLU and transfer to other universities to continue their college basketball careers.
Sunday, Sept. 12
Mitchell and Reed are given their summons to appear at a Student Conduct Hearing.
Saturday, Sept. 18 9 p.m.- Mitchell and Reed receive the results of the conduct hearing, according to Reed. They both receive a one-year suspension from the University. Both of the players send their appeals to Vice President for Student Development Kent Porterfield for review. The players were allowed to stay on campus during the appeal process.
Wednesday, Oct. 13
SLU releases a brief statement regarding Mitchell and Reed’s enrollment. The statement reads: “Saint Louis University men’s basketball players Kwamain Mitchell and Willie Reed are currently not enrolled at the University. Federal law — the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — does not allow the University to release any additional information without the consent of the students involved.”
News Editor
and ERIKA MILLER
Saturday, May 1
Kwamain Mitchell and Willie Reed meet a female student outside of Laclede Street Bar & Grill. They discuss basketball. Mitchell and the female student exchange phone numbers.
By ANDREA ROYALS
2:45 a.m.- Female student is standing outside of Laclede’s, where four of the basketball players- Mitchell, Reed and two former players- are standing. They invite the girl to a party that they say is going on in the Grand Forest Apartments. 2:50 a.m.- The female student, Mitchell, Reed, and two former players leave the outside of the bar and walk down Laclede Street to Grand Forest Apartments.
Enterprise Editor
On the cusp of what was shaping up to be a promising season, the Saint Louis University men’s basketball program was knocked back a few paces after an announcement that starting point guard and team captain Kwamain Mitchell and starting center Willie Reed were no longer enrolled at the University. The announcement came Oct. 13, right before the team began practices and public appearances in anticipation of the season. Due to internal privacy regulations, SLU officials gave no further details on why Reed and Mitchell were no longer enrolled in the University. This came amid allegations that they sexually assaulted a female student last spring. On May 1, St. Louis Metropolitan Police arrested and questioned three SLU basketball players after a 20-year-old female student said that she had been sexually assaulted the previous evening in Grand Forest Apartments. The players, Mitchell, Reed and a player who
has since transferred to another university, were released, and no charges were filed due to insufficient evidence. However, the circuit attorney’s office’s sex crimes unit is still reviewing the case. With no criminal charges brought against the alleged offenders, the female student, who has also transferred to a different university, pursued action at SLU through the office of student conduct. According to SLU’s policy regarding cases of sexual misconduct, “even if criminal justice authorities choose not to prosecute, the University can pursue disciplinary action.” Such action could result in dismissal or suspension. A student conduct hearing was held Sept. 17, involving the allegations of sexual assault. Mitchell and Reed received the results of the hearing Sept. 28 that called for a one-year suspension from the University. Both players chose to appeal this decision to Vice President for Student Development Kent Porterfield, who is responsible for reviewing appeal requests brought through student conduct. According to Reed, on Oct. 12, Mitchell and Reed received the results of the appeal, which reduced the one-year suspension to a
one-semester suspension with the ability to reapply to the University after Jan. 1, among other requirements, including letters of apology to the victim, the University and the basketball program. The statement released by the University Oct. 13 read: “Saint Louis University men’s basketball players Kwamain Mitchell and Willie Reed are currently not enrolled at the University. Federal law — the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — does not allow the University to release any additional information without the consent of the students involved.” Mitchell’s attorney John Rogers told St. Louis Post-Dispatch that Mitchell plans on returning to SLU in January and complying with all stipulations set forth by the University. “The administration and the appellate process found that there was no evidence to substantiate that Kwamain should be disciplined for any type of sexual assault,” Rogers said to the Post. “I anticipate that Kwamain will do everything in his power to See “Basketball” on Page 11
3:00 a.m.- They arrive at a former player’s apartment. The University News cannot confirm what happened in the apartment after they arrived. 3:50 a.m.- The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department is called. 4:00 a.m.- Officers arrive and the female student gives her statement, as EMTs assist her outside of Marchetti Towers East. 4:05 a.m.- Department of Public Safety arrives on site. The female student also gives her statement to DPSSS, formerly known as DPS. 6:00 a.m.- Mitchell, Reed and a former player are taken into custody by the St. Louis Metropolitan Police. The three players are transported to the downtown station at 215 North 9th Street. 6:15 a.m. through early afternoon- Mitchell, Reed and a former player are questioned. All four individuals are released. The players walk back to their apartments.
Friday, Sept. 17
A conduct hearing is conducted from 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. in the Allied Health Professions Building on the Medical Campus. Each witness has to give an oath that he or she will not share the details of the hearing.
Willie Reed GamesPlayed: Played:67 67 Games MinutesAveraged: Averaged:24.7 24.7 Minutes TotalRebounds: Rebounds:424 424 Total Blocks:113 113 Blocks: PointsAverage: Average:10.2 10.2 Points
By CHRIS ACKELS Sports Editor
and ANDREA ROYALS
Mitchell and Reed receive the results of their appeals. Their consequence is reduced to suspension for one semester, with the ability to reapply to SLU after Jan. 1, 2011. Also, Mitchell and Reed must write a letter of apology to the girl, SLU and the men’s basketball team.
On Wednesday, Oct. 13, Saint Louis University released a brief statement regarding the enrollment of two men’s basketball players: “Saint Louis University men’s basketball players Kwamain Mitchell and Willie Reed are currently not enrolled at the University. Federal law — the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) — does not allow the University to release any additional information without the consent of the students involved.” Under SLU regulations for FERPA, the University “will not disclose personally identifiable information from a student’s educational record without prior written consent of the student.”
Mitchell and Reed move out of Grand Forest Apartments and leave campus. Reed receives his athletic scholarship back in the afternoon, releasing him from SLU and allowing him to play at other institutions.
GamesPlayed: Played:66 66 Games MinutesAveraged: Averaged:32.5 32.5 Minutes FieldGoal GoalPercent: Percent:.441 .441 Field Assists:219 219 Assists: PointsAverage: Average:13.6 13.6 Points
Student Conduct: Process remains unclear
Tuesday, Oct. 12
Thursday, Oct. 14
Kwamain Mitchell
News Editor
Educational records consist entirely disregarded, and Reed of admissions records, official said that the case was brought transcripts and non-academic before the Student Conduct Board disciplinary records, which at the University last month. Reed include records said the hearing of student took place from conduct, among 2 p.m. to 10 others. p.m. on Friday, Following Sept. 17 at the the regulations, [The Conduct Board] goes Allied Health the University off of a ‘more-than-likely’ P r o f e s s i o n s has refused to situation, and they say that Building. comment on just because I was there, it According to the removal of was ‘more-than-likely’ that I the University’s Mitchell and Student Code Reed. However, was involved. of Conduct, Reed said that “ s e x u a l -Willie Reed their suspension misconduct,” is the result of an is defined as alleged sexual “sexual acts of harassment case that was brought any nature that occur without forth last spring from a female the consent of the victim or student who has since left SLU. that occur when the victim may Due to insufficient evidence, be incapable of consenting... criminal charges were never filed. committed either by force, However, the incident was not intimidation or through use of
“
”
the victim’s mental incapacity or physical helplessness, including intoxication.” According to Reed and his family, the allegations of sexual misconduct against him are false. Willie Reed Sr., father of the former SLU basketball center, called the process of the hearing “totally unfair” for several reasons. “I was not allowed to be there to defend my son. [The female student’s] parents were there and her dad was the one who See “Student Conduct” on Page 3
Blue the Billiken A new challenge
Because this investigation is still ongoing in the circuit attorney’s office and due to the protection offered by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), the following questions still remain unanswered in this case: - What actually happened in the Grand Forest Apartments on the night of May 1? - Was the SLU student conduct code applied consistently and fairly throughout the process? - Will the circuit attorney’s office ever have enough evidence to press charges? - Will the case ever be closed? - Will the University ever be able to give a full statement on what transpired with this incident?
Read and Recycle The University News prints on partially recycled paper.