Nova in 2011-2012 by Universidade Nova

NOVA in 2011-2012: courses, teaching staff, students, graduates and employability

May 2013

1. Offer By "study cycles already in operation" were considered the study cycles accredited by A3ES and recorded by DGES, with students enrolled in NOVA.

1.2 Composition of Study Cycles Already in Operation at UNL (N= 190) 13,68% 5,79%

32,11%

48,42%

1st (N= 26)

MI (N= 11)

2nd (N= 92)

3rd (N= 61)

«Study cycles in association» were considered as those involving, at least, one Portuguese higher education institution (HEI) besides NOVA, being therefore organized in accordance with article 42.º of Decree-Law n.º 107/2008. «Study cycles in collaboration» include, at least, one foreign HEI, as, for example, the case of Erasmus Mundus Masters and PhD programmes. Study cycles that comprise more than one academic unit of NOVA (table 1.1) may be considered as in «association»

Teaching Quality Office

if they integrate another national HEI, in «collaboration» if they include a foreign HEI or if they are lectured exclusively by NOVA’s academic units.

1.3 Study Cycles in Association/Collaboration UNL= 28 12 11 10 9 8 7 Nr. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

1st (UNL= 0)

FCM

2nd (UNL= 18)

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

3rd (UNL= 10)

It should be pointed out that the two study cycles in association/collaboration of ISEGI correspond to an Erasmus Mundus master degree and to a master course where some students complete part of the programme at a foreign institution therefore receiving two diplomas. This situation is regulated by bilateral agreements between the institutions. Table 1.1 – Study Cycles in association/collaboration involving more than one academic unit of NOVA Study Cycle Name MSc MSc MSc MSc MSc

Science Communication Communication, Media and Justice Law and Management Medical Microbiology Sustainable Urbanism and Spatial Planning Climate Change and Sustainable Development PhD Policies PhD Educational Sciences

AU where it was counted FCSH FCSH Nova SBE FCT FCT FCT FCSH

PhD E-Planning

FCT

PhD Digital Media

FCT

Teaching Quality Office

Other AU involved ITQB FD FD FCM, IHMT, ITQB FCSH FCSH, FC/UL, ICS/UL, FL/UL, ISA/UTL, IST/UTL FCT, ISPA FCSH, UA, FC/UL, ISCSP/UTL FCSH, UPorto

In table 1.1, the study cycles were counted only in the academic unit where students enrolled in 2011/12 or, in cases where the enrolments took place in more than one institution, in the proponent regarding A3ES.

The same study cycle can be counted in a national association, as well as in an international one, if the consortium includes higher education institutions with these two features.

1.4 Composition of study cyles in association/collaboration - Total 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 Nr. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

Association with foreign HEI (UNL=9)

Teaching Quality Office

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

Association with national HEI (UNL= 23)

1.5 Composition of study cyles in association/collaboration - 2nd Study Cycles6 5 4 Nr. 3 2 1 0 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

Association with foreign HEI (UNL=7)

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

Association with national HEI (UNL= 13)

1.6 Composition of study cyles in association/collaboration - 3rd Study Cycles9 8 7 6 5 Nr.

4 3 2 1 0 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

Association with foreign HEI (UNL= 2)

Teaching Quality Office

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

Association with national HEI (UNL= 10)

2. Demand Regarding 1.st study cycles and integrated masters, it was opted to provide, for all indicators, the data relating to 1.st phase applications only. This decision relates to the current inability to determine the exact number of applicants of the three existent phases, since one would have to check whether there was repetition of applicants between different phases. The data relating to 1.st study cycles and integrated masters were provided by the Planning Division (on 14/12/2012) and are included on CNAES 2011-2012 (National Competition for Access to Higher Education). The data concerning 2.nd and 3.rd study cycles were provided by the Academic Services Direction - Academic Management, Employability and Career Management Division (data collected in January 2012). No information was gathered on the number of applicants for NOVAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s masters and PhD programmes.

2.1 Total applicants/Total vacancies 12,00 10,00

Ratio

8,00 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE 1st cycle

Teaching Quality Office

FCM

ISEGI

UNL

(Average)

Integrated Masters

2.2 Total applicants in 1st option/Total vacancies 3,00 2,50

Ratio

2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 0,00 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE 1st cycle

FCM

ISEGI

UNL

(Average)

Integrated Masters

Both Nova SBE and ITQB do not establish vacancies to their masters and PhD programmes. Therefore, it is not possible to calculate the following indicators: total placements/total vacancies and filled vacancies/total vacancies. Nevertheless, we inform that the total number of placed and of enrolled students in Nova SBE 2.nd study cycles was of 537 and 392, respectively. In 3.rd study cycles both values totalized 6 students. In ITQB, in 2011/2012, there was in operation only one PhD, which had 30 enrolled and placed students. When the ratio of total placements/total vacancies is higher than 1, it means that supernumerary students were accepted.

Teaching Quality Office

2.3 Total placements/Total vacancies 1,40 1,20

Ratio

1,00 0,80 0,60 0,40 0,20 0,00 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ENSP

UNL (Average)

1st

2nd

3rd

No information was gathered on the number of placed students in 1.st option for masters and PhD programmes.

2.4 Total placements in 1st option/Total placements 1,00 0,90 0,80 0,70 Ratio

0,60 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE 1st cycle

Teaching Quality Office

FCM

ISEGI

UNL

(Average)

Integrated Masters

Regarding 1.st study cycles and integrated masters, the indicator filled vacancies/total vacancies is not disclosed because the number of enrolled students refers to the three access phases and only the total vacancies of 1.st phase are available. Currently, there is no information about which enrolled students did so in 1.st option in any study level.

2.5 Filled vacancies/Total vacancies 1,40 1,20

Ratio

1,00 0,80 0,60 0,40 0,20 0,00 FCT

FCSH

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ENSP

UNL (Average)

2nd cycle

Teaching Quality Office

3rd cycle

3. Students Since the teaching quality assurance system concerns only degree-awarding courses, the total number of students does not include those enrolled in study cycles classified as E (specializations) in RAIDES 2011.

3.1 Total of Students at UNL (N=19.149)

10,96% 1st (N=6.848) 35,76%

22,14%

MI (N=5.962) 2nd (N=4.240) 3rd (N=2.099)

31,13%

3.2 Total of Students of 1st Study Cycles (N=6.848)

4,85% 6,57%

25,45%

FCT (N=1.743) FCSH (N=2.869)

21,23%

Nova SBE (N=1.454) FD (N=450) 41,90%

Teaching Quality Office

ISEGI (N=332)

3.3 Total of Students of Integrated Masters (N=5.962)

26,45% FCT (N=4.385) FCM (N=1.577) 73,55%

3.4 Total of Students of 2nd Study Cycles (N=4.240) 3,47% FCT (N=852)

2,92% 6,60%

20,09%

FCSH (N=1.512) Nova SBE (N=838)

7,76%

FCM (N=158)

3,73%

FD (N=329) 19,76%

35,66%

IHMT (N=124) ISEGI (N=280) ENSP (N=147)

Teaching Quality Office

3.5 Total of Students of 3rd Study Cycles (N=2.099) 3,24% FCT (N=539) FCSH (N=868) 1,62% 4,19%

12,01%

25,68%

2,95%

Nova SBE (N=33) FCM (N=155) FD (N=88)

7,38%

IHMT (N=62) ISEGI (N=34)

1,57% 41,35%

ITQB (N=252) ENSP (N=68)

Teaching Quality Office

4. Teaching Staff The data presented are the ones included in INDEZ 2011.

4.1 Total of Teaching Staff at UNL (N=1.486)

2% 2%

FCT (N=472)

FCSH (N=307)

2% 2%

Nova SBE (N=161) 32%

FCM (N=378)

25%

FD (N=30) IHMT (N=41) 11%

ISEGI (N=35)

21%

ITQB (N=27) ENSP (N=35)

4.2 Level of Qualification of the Teaching Staff Total of Doctorates FTE/Total of Teaching Staff FTE 1,200 1,000

1,000

0,982 0,909

0,862

0,869

0,838 0,800 Ratio

0,796 (Average)

0,750

0,600

0,552 0,402

0,400 0,200 0,000 FCT

Teaching Quality Office

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

4.3 Level of Consolidation and Stability of UNL's Teaching Staff 40,00% 33,97%

35,00%

31,50%

30,00% 25,00%

22,16%

20,00% 14,14%

15,00% 10,00% 5,00% 0,00% Level of Consolidation

Stability Measure I

Stability Measure II

Stability Measure III

The percentages presented on graph 4.3 correspond to the ones described on table 2.1: Table 2.1 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Level of Consolidation and Stability of UNLâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Teaching Staff

Percentages Consolidation Level Stability Measure I Stability Measure II Stability Measure III

Teaching Quality Office

(Full Professors+Associate Professors)/Total Doctorate Teaching Staff Invited Full Professors/( Full Professors+Invited Full Professors) Invited Associate Professors/( Associate Professors+Invited Associate Professors) Invited Assistant Professors/( Assistant Professors+Invited Assistant Professors)

UNL

Reference Value (ECDU)

31,50%

50% a 70%

14,14%

<1/3

22,16%

<1/3

33,97%

<1/3

4.4 Level of Available Resources to the Teaching of Students AU Total of Students/Total of Teaching Staff FTE 45,00

42,60

40,00 35,11

35,00

Ratio

30,00 24,47

25,00 20,00

22,31

21,06

20,82

(Average)

16,94

15,00

11,61

10,05

10,00 5,67 5,00 0,00 FCT

Teaching Quality Office

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

5. Internationalization These graphs represent the percentage of students with foreign citizenship that are attending regularly study cycles at NOVA. The data are included in RAIDES 2011.

5.1 Percentage of Foreign Students 35%

32,26%

30% 25% 20% 15,48%

15,87%

15% 10,04% 10% 6,71% 5%

4,48%

5,29%

7,18%

6,00% 0,93%

0% FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

5.2 Distribution of Foreign Students by Study Cycle Level 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% FCT

FCSH Nova SBE

FCM

1st

IHMT 2nd

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

3rd

5.3 Location of Foreign Students at UNL (N=1.374) 0% FCT (N=337) 7% 5% 4%

FCSH (N=527) 25%

Nova SBE (N=156) FCM (N=100)

FD (N=52) IHMT (N=60)

11%

ISEGI (N=100) 38%

ITQB (N=40) ENSP (N=2)

Teaching Quality Office

5.4 Percentage of Foreign Students by Study Cycle Levels 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM 1st

FD MI

IHMT 2nd

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

3rd

5.5 Percentage of Foreign Students - 1st Study Cycles 8%

7,32%

7% 6,22% 6% 5,34% 5%

4,53%

4,52%

4% 3% 2,34% 2% 1% 0% FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

5.6 Percentage of Foreign Students - Integrated Master 8% 7% 6% 5% 4%

3,35%

3,27%

3,04%

3% 2% 1% 0% FCT

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

5.7 Percentage of Foreign Students - 2nd Study Cycles 35% 29,64%

30%

26,61%

25,95% 25% 20% 13,48%

15%

12,57%

12,59%

10% 6,46%

5,47%

5% 0,68% 0% FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

5.8 Percentage of Foreign Students - 3rd Study Cycles 50% 43,55%

45% 40% 35% 27,27%

30% 25% 20% 10%

15,87%

14,63%

15%

13,29%

10,39% 7,10%

5,88%

6,82%

1,47%

0% FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

Nova SBE

FCM

IHMT

ISEGI

ITQB

ENSP

UNL

6. Success Rate Students from Integrated Masters can obtain a 1st cycle degree after completing 180 ECTS. Therefore, it is presented two columns for the Bachelors of FCT: one for regular 1st study cycle and other for 1st study cycle included in an integrated master. In FCM, since this AU does not offer 1st cycle studies, the data related to the completion of the referred ECTS was not included in the graphs. Nonetheless, according to RAIDES, in 2011, 244 students enrolled in the integrated master degree at FCM obtained the 1st cycle degree, 92,6% of them in the required number of years (N), 4,1% in one more year (N+1), 1,2% needed 2 mores years (N+2) and 2% more than 2 years (>N+2). The following regular durations (N) were considered by level of study: Bachelor N=3; Integrated Master N=5; Master N=2; PhD N=4.

6.1 Success Rate - 1st Study Cycle 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% N years FCT (regular)

Teaching Quality Office

N+1 years FCT (in IM)

FCSH

N+2 years Nova SBE

> N+2 years ISEGI

UNL

6.2 Success Rate - Integrated Master 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% N years

N+1 years FCT

N+2 years FCM

> N+2 years

UNL

6.3 Success Rate - 2nd Study Cycle 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% N years FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

N+1 years Nova SBE

FCM

N+2 years FD

IHMT

ISEGI

> N+2 years ENSP

UNL

6.4 Success Rate - 3rd Study Cycle 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% N years FCT

FCSH

Teaching Quality Office

N+1 years Nova SBE

FCM

N+2 years FD

IHMT

ISEGI

> N+2 years ITQB

ENSP

UNL

6.6 Success Rate - FCSH 100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

0% N years

N+1 years 1st Study Cycle

N+2 years

2nd Study Cycle

36,9%

0,7%

7,0%

32,3%

28,4%

58,2% 18,5%

10%

35,6%

12,3%

20%

12,8%

30%

48,8%

40%

8,6%

50%

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.7 Success Rate - Nova SBE 100% 90% 80% 70%

25,0%

0,0%

3,7%

0,0%

2,7%

6,7%

10%

0,0%

20%

35,1%

30%

54,5%

40%

10,0%

87,2%

50%

75,0%

60%

0% N years

N+1 years 1st Study Cycle

Teaching Quality Office

2nd Study Cycle

N+2 years

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.8 Success Rate - FCM100% 90% 80% 70%

0% N years

N+1 years Integrated Master

N+2 years

2nd Study Cycle

0,0%

12,5% 1,9%

0,0%

37,5%

5,8%

10%

0,0%

6,3%

20%

43,8%

30%

2,4%

40%

89,8%

50%

100,0%

60%

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.9 Success Rate - FD100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

0,0%

6,6%

0,0%

3,8%

5,5%

47,2%

0,0%

10%

22,0%

20%

0,0%

30%

49,1%

40%

65,9%

50%

0% N years

N+1 years 1st Study Cycle

Teaching Quality Office

2nd Study Cycle

N+2 years

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.10 Success Rate - IHMT100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

0,0%

6,0%

0,0%

10%

38,0%

20%

28,6%

30%

14,0%

40%

42,0%

71,4%

50%

0% N years

N+1 years 2nd Study Cycle

N+2 years

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.11 Success Rate - ISEGI100% 90% 80% 70%

0,0%

4,0%

3,7%

0,0%

8,0%

3,7%

0,0%

10%

28,0%

20%

7,4%

30%

100,0%

40%

60,0%

50%

85,2%

60%

0% N years

N+1 years 1st Study Cycle

Teaching Quality Office

2nd Study Cycle

N+2 years

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

6.12 Success Rate - ITQB100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40%

N+1 years

10%

6,7%

35,6%

N years

20%

26,7%

31,1%

30%

N+2 years

> N+2 years

0% 3rd Study Cycle

6.13 Success Rate - ENSP100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

40,0%

10,0%

0,0%

10%

50,0%

20%

0,0%

30%

40,0%

40%

60,0%

50%

0% N years

N+1 years 2nd Study Cycle

Teaching Quality Office

N+2 years

> N+2 years

3rd Study Cycle

7. Employability The presented data was collected and analyzed by the Observatory of Graduates’ Transitions into Work at NOVA (OBIPNOVA) and concerns the questionnaire applied to UNL graduates that ended their courses in 2008/09, namely the characterization of their situation one year after that conclusion. Considering that the first study cycles organized according to the Bologna Process started in 2006/2007, the majority of graduates enquired concluded their studies in the pre-Bologna model. For a “confidence level” of 95%, the samples concerning the 2008/09 graduates are statistical representative. The “margin of error” is 1,8% in the case of first-degree graduates, 1,5% for masters and 7,5% in what concerns PhDs graduates, while the response rates achieved respectively 67,3%, 74% and 50,9%. The first set of graphs show the professional situation of graduates one year after completing the study cycle. The EUROSTAT classification, adopted by INE, includes three categories: Employed – the individual with the minimal specified age that, in the reference period, finds himself/herself in one of the following situations: (a) he/she had work at least one hour, upon payment of a fee, in view of a profit or familiar gain in cash or in kind; (b) he/she had a job with a formal liaison to it, but was not at service; (c) he/she had a company but was temporarily not working for a specific reason; (d) he/she was in a pre-reform condition while working in the reference period. Unemployed – the individual with the minimal specified age that, in the reference period, finds himself/herself simultaneously in the following situations: (a) he/she does not have a paid job or any other; (b) he/she is available to work in a paid or unpaid job; (c) he/she has kept looking for a job, this is, has taken active steps over a specified period to find a paid or unpaid job. What is considered as steps: (i) contact with a public employment center or private agencies; (ii) contact with employers; (iii) personal contacts; (iv) placement or response to employment ads; (v) participation in examinations or interviews for selection; (vi) search for land, premises or equipment; (vii) application for licenses or financial resources to create his/her own company. Economically Inactive – individual of any age that, in the reference period, cannot be considered economically active, this is, that is not employed nor unemployed, neither in mandatory military service. Therefore, the percentage of unemployed graduates is affected by the number of "inactive individuals"; the higher the number of inactive individuals, the lower the percentage of unemployed graduates. According to the definition of this category, the 1st cycle graduates that continue their studies by doing master degrees are considered “economically inactive”. Note, however, that master students are only classified as "inactive" if they have not made efforts to get

Teaching Quality Office

a job and simultaneously declare themselves as not available to work in the reference period. If not, they are classified as "unemployed" even though they are studying.

7.1 Employability of UNL Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

5,95%

2,38%

3,30%

10%

7,55%

89,15% 32,97%

20%

10,20%

30%

56,83%

50% 40%

91,67%

60%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

7.2 Employability of FCT Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

3,03%

7,28%

88,24% 4,48%

10%

35,32%

20%

8,94%

30%

55,74%

50% 40%

93,94%

60%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

Please refer to page 29 for the definition of Employed, Unemployed and Economically Inactive.

Teaching Quality Office

7.3 Employability of FCSH Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

10,81%

0,00%

10%

10,24%

85,84% 3,92%

20%

14,65%

30%

17,20%

40%

68,15%

50%

89,19%

60%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

7.4 Employability of Nova SBE Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70% 50%

10%

2,88%

35,16%

20%

10,05%

30%

54,79%

40%

1,92%

95,19%

60%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

There are no data available for Nova SBEâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s doctorates.

Please refer to page 29 for the definition of Employed, Unemployed and Economically Inactive.

Teaching Quality Office

7.5 Employability of FCM Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70% 92,49%

100,00%

60% 50% 40%

0,00%

10%

0,00%

20%

6,94%

5,78%

30%

0% Masters

Doctorates Cohort 2008/09

Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

7.6 Employability of FD Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

0,00%

93,75%

3,13%

10%

3,13%

20%

17,24%

30%

8,62%

40%

74,14%

50%

100,00%

60%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

Please refer to page 29 for the definition of Employed, Unemployed and Economically Inactive.

Teaching Quality Office

7.7 Employability of IHMT Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

20% 10%

0,00%

30%

23,08%

40%

7,69%

69,23%

75,00%

50%

25,00%

60%

0% Masters

Doctorates Cohort 2008/09

Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

7.8 Employability of ISEGI Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80% 70%

40%

93,75%

50%

95,24%

60%

4,76%

0,00%

10%

2,08%

20%

4,17%

30%

0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

Cohort 2008/09 Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

There are no data available for ISEGIâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s doctorates.

Please refer to page 29 for the definition of Employed, Unemployed and Economically Inactive.

Teaching Quality Office

7.9 Employability of ITQB Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80%

50% 40%

100,00%

60%

100,00%

70%

0,00%

10%

0,00%

20%

0,00%

30%

0% Masters

Doctorates Cohort 2008/09

Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

7.10 Employability of ENSP Graduates (professional situation 1 year after completing the study cycle) 100% 90% 80%

50% 40%

95,83%

60%

100,00%

70%

0,00%

10%

4,17%

20%

0,00%

30%

0% Masters

Doctorates Cohort 2008/09

Employed

Unemployed

Economically Inactive

Please refer to page 29 for the definition of Employed, Unemployed and Economically Inactive.

Teaching Quality Office

The following graphs show the percentage of graduates with a professional occupation that matches their academic level one year after graduation. The concept of â&#x20AC;&#x153;matchingâ&#x20AC;? is based on the skill levels of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). The three first ISCO categories include posts that are typically occupied by tertiary education graduates (EUROSTAT). The data show the percentage of respondents whose professional activity is matched to the level of instruction.

7.11 Percentage of graduates of UNL with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

30%

100,00%

40%

77,20%

50%

97,50%

60%

Masters

Doctorates

91,00%

70%

20% 10% 0% Bachelors

All cycles

Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

7.12 Percentage of graduates of FCT with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80% 70% 100,00%

97,22%

40%

98,46%

50%

93,46%

60%

Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Cohort 2008/09

7.13 Percentage of graduates of FCSH with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

30%

100,00%

40%

Masters

Doctorates

62,16%

50%

95,22%

60%

83,06%

70%

20% 10% 0% Bachelors

All cycles

Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

7.14 Percentage of graduates of Nova SBE with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80% 70%

30%

87,71%

40%

78,65%

50%

96,67%

60%

20% 10% 0% Bachelors

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

Cohort 2008/09

There are no data available for Nova SBEâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s doctorates.

7.15 Percentage of graduates of FCM with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

98,86%

40%

100,00%

50%

87,50%

60%

100,00%

70%

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Bachelors

Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

7.16 Percentage of graduates of FD with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

96,77%

40%

100,00%

50%

90,91%

60%

100,00%

70%

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Bachelors

Cohort 2008/09

7.17 Percentage of graduates of IHMT with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

40%

100,00%

50%

100,00%

60%

100,00%

70%

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

7.18 Percentage of graduates of ISEGI with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

40%

100,00%

50%

92,50%

60%

Bachelors

Masters

94,92%

70%

30% 20% 10% 0% Doctorates

All cycles

Cohort 2008/09

There are no data available for ISEGIâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s doctorates.

7.19 Percentage of graduates of ITQB with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80%

40%

100,00%

50%

100,00%

60%

100,00%

70%

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

7.20 Percentage of graduates of ENSP with a professional occupation matched to their instruction level 1 year after graduation 100% 90% 80% 70% 95,83%

40%

100,00%

50%

95,65%

60%

Masters

Doctorates

All cycles

30% 20% 10% 0% Cohort 2008/09

Teaching Quality Office

8. Dropout Rate The dropout rate was calculated in the following way: (1) Enrolled students in 31-12-2010 (4) Enrolled students for the 1st time in 31-12-2011 (2) Enrolled students in 31-12-2011 (5) Reentries in 31-12-2010 (3) Graduates in 2011 (6) Calculated Dropouts = (1)-(3)+(4)+(5)â&#x20AC;&#x201C;(2) Dropout Rate = (6)/(1) X100 It should be noted that the data can be inflated by the incorrect fill in of RAIDES 2011, particularly in what concerns the reentries registry at FCSH and ISEGI.

8.1 Dropout Rate - 1st Study Cycle and Integrated Master 100% 90% 80% 70% 60%

9,72%

1,71%

2,53%

5,46%

10%

13,42%

20%

6,58%

30%

11,33%

40%

19,40%

50%

0% FCT (1st cycle)

FCT (IM)

Teaching Quality Office

FCSH

Nova SBE

FCM FCM (IM) (1st cycle)

ISEGI

Gabinete de Apoio Ă Qualidade do Ensino Reitoria da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Campus de Campolide |1099-085 Lisboa Portugal Telef.: +351 213 845 203 | 210 436 891/892 E-mail: qualidade@unl.pt | www.unl.pt