4-10-17

Page 1

NEWS

ARTS & CULTURE

SPORTS

Find out more about the Elections Commission, the referees of Student Senate elections » page 3

KU hosts Q & A and screening of award-winning ‘Out in the Night’

Devonte’ Graham to stay for his senior year

» page 5

» page 8

MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2017 | VOLUME 133 ISSUE 23

THE UNIVERSITY DAILY KANSAN THE STUDENT VOICE SINCE 1904

SENATE ELECTI O N 2017

KU chooses its next student senate administration on Wednesday and Thursday. Before you vote, read about the candidates, coalitions and their platforms.

Final debate focuses on inclusion, representation DARBY VANHOUTAN @darbyvanhoutan

Editor’s Note: The Kansan worked with the Elections Commission to help coordinate this debate. The writer of this story was not involved in the planning.

The seats in Woodruff Auditorium were filled with students waiting for answers on Friday evening as the final debate of the elections season was held by the Elections Commission and University Daily Kansan.

PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

KUnited, TrueKU, Onward and OneKU presidential candidates, Tomas Green, Chancellor Adams, Chance Maginness and Mady Womack, respectively, were each asked the tough questions regarding platform feasibility and representation by moderator Garrett Farlow, chair of the Elections Commission. Questions produced beforehand by the commission, as well as ones fielded by the Kansan from individuals watching on Facebook and Twitter, were posed to the four candidates. Similarly to the first debate, candidates held fast to their stances on hot button issues such as a $50 fee for union renovations, which all but Maginness said they

Sarah Wright/KANSAN Student Senate presidential candidates Chancellor Adams, Tomas Green, Mady Womack and Chance Maginness answer the first questions of the night.

would vote no to, as well as issues such as campus carry and the current $2 newspaper readership fee. The discrepancies came, however, in regards to how representation and inclusion would be considered by candidates. “A lot of students leave this University because they don’t feel like they belong,” Green said during the debate. “That belonging is critically important and it needs to begin with how can we prioritize student safety, how do we make sure that

we’re investing and informing these students.”

UNION REFERENDUM DEBATE The presidential debate, which lasted an hour and drew a crowd of approximately 50 students, was followed by a debate between the Redo Your U campaign and KU Against Rising Tuition (KUART). The debate, which was included plenty of back and forth between the two student groups, aimed to present both the “for” and “against” sides of

Are the platforms doable? DARBY VANHOUTAN @darbyvanhoutan

The platforms of Student Senate coalitions are more than hot-button issues to get votes, they’re plans and policies involving student fees and the future of the University. This year, the feasibility of these platforms appear fairly solid, based on feedback from professionals at the University as well as presidential candidates themselves. Joseph Harrington, an English professor and president of University Senate, has experience in how Student Senate accomplishes the goals they publicized to voters during campaign season. “Both faculty and the administration try to be as open as possible to student ideas,” Harrington said. According to Harrington,

many of these plans are accomplished through fees which are a part of the almost $20 million allocated by Student Senate each year. However, by both honing in on specific, top-priority platforms, picked by the presidential candidates themselves, as well as examining the policies they involve, voters can get a sense of how feasible the platforms coalitions are running with are.

ONWARD According to Onward’s presidential candidate Chance Maginness, two of the most important platforms to Onward are their wet campus and music festival platforms. “The other platforms are nice because they fix a lot of problems that we have but I think these particular platforms really speak to

INDEX NEWS............................................2 OPINION........................................4 ARTS & CULTURE..........................................5 SPORTS.........................................8

parts of the KU experience and being a student and just kind of speak to more of the fun aspects of the campaign which I think are often left in the dust,” Maginness said. The first platform calling for a wet campus would not be impossible to accomplish. “It’s simple in the sense that it can be done easily but difficult in the sense that it’s going to require the most persuasion on behalf of students,” Maginness said. Student Affairs would not comment on the feasibility of this plan. However, there are other factors involved. Alcohol on campus is currently not allowed by state law. Harrington also adds that any change like this would, as a final step, have SEE FEASABILITY PAGE 2

the referendum being presented to the student body in the upcoming election regarding a $50 Union fee. Lev Comolli, president of KUART, and Tommy Finch, vice president of KUART, represented the group at the debate, arguing that students should vote no on the upcoming referendum due to the lack of transparency from the Redo Your U campaign as well as the overall “excessiveness” of the fee. “We agree that the Union is an important building on

campus and should be kept in good condition,” Comolli said. “However, this bill is not a renovation but an expansion of Union revenue operations.” Recently, KUART filed a complaint against the Union referendum on the basis of bribery and early campaigning. After hearing this claim, the Elections Commission forced the Union referendum to remove campaign items and halt campaigning, a decision that was stayed pending a Court of Appeals hear-

ing Monday. The Union referendum was represented by group members Kassandra Valles, a senior from Mission, and Garrison Krotz, a senior from St. Louis. The two argued that students should vote yes on the referendum in support of the fee in order to make necessary renovations but also to make the Union more accessible. “To say that what we’re doing here isn’t conducive of a healthy atmosphere at the University or the fact that it’s not creating a place that students want to come to school is simply not true,” Krotz said. “What we’re doing is creating a place that’s more accessible to students and to create a place for students to work and come together.”

VICE-PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

The three-part event ended with a debate among three out of the four vice-presidential candidates. In attendance were KUnited vice-presidential candidate Zoya Khan, TrueKU vice-presidential candidate Andrew Davis and OneKU vice-presidential candidate Mattie Carter. Onward vice-presidential candidate Logan Miller was absent from the debate SEE DEBATE PAGE 2

Editorial: Onward the wrong choice for KU KANSAN EDITORIAL BOARD @KansanNews

Student Senate is a tricky institution. Although many students dismiss it, Senate has a great deal of power compared to other student governments. And by power, we mean money. Each year, Student Senate is responsible for distributing nearly $20 million of student money across campus. Not only is this a huge responsibility because it’s a large sum of money, but because Senate has the power with this money to make meaningful and lasting changes to the campus. That is why we, the Kansan Editorial Board,

KANSAN.COM ONLINE EXCLUSIVE Read more about coalitions’ responses to our voters’ questionnaire at Kansan.com

believe that if the power should go to anyone, it should go to the people who intend to advocate on behalf of the student body. Student Senate members need to be professional, mature, even-tempered and ethically upright. The Onward coalition has been none of these things. The Kansan Editorial Board did not come to this conclusion lightly. It is rare for the Kansan to issue Student Senate endorsements, much less oppositions. However, we believe that in this circumstance, it is necessary and in the best interest of the student body to be transparent about our opinion. In our assessment

of the coalitions, we determined that despite differences, each had its merits, except for one — Onward. Student Senate can be a vessel through which politically passionate students can find a place to improve things for their fellow classmates, or it can be a resume booster for people who, despite interest in their own status and notoriety, are otherwise apathetic individuals. Onward’s main platforms of a wet campus and a music festival are perhaps the most blatant forms of pandering in recent Student Senate SEE ONWARD PAGE 4

ENGAGE WITH US @KANSANNEWS

KANSAN.NEWS

/THEKANSAN

@UNIVERSITY DAILYKANSAN


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
4-10-17 by University Daily Kansan - Issuu