VOL. XXIV, Issue 5, UO

Page 1

THE UNIVERSITY OBSERVER HOW WILL LEO FARE IN 2018? OWEN CUSKELLY PAGE 5

INTERVIEW WITH COLM O’GORMAN CLAUDIA DALBY PAGE 9

IS THE EARTH FLAT? CHRISTINE COFFEY PAGE 13

ENTIRE CLASS TO RESIT “COMPROMISED” EXAM

DYLAN O’NEILL OTWO EDITOR

Students of PHYS20050 Cell-Cell Communication did not receive their grades for the module from last semester but were instead informed that they would have to resit the exam. The exam was described as having been “compromised.” It has emerged that images of an exam incredibly similar to this one had been circulated among many students before the exam. On Monday 22nd January, students enrolled in the module received an email, stating that the exam had been “compromised and thus rendered invalid.” The email also informed students that they would have to sit “a new examination of the same format” this semester. The date and time of the new exam was discussed between the class representatives and the school’s faculty during a meeting, which took place later that week. Consequently, the students did not receive a grade for the module along with the rest of their grades on Wednesday 24th. The results for the exam showed a suspiciously high

number of As and Bs. “The usual bell-curve that you get with grades didn’t happen. It was skewed to the right, so there were more A and B grades than would usually be the case,” Alex Conway* told the University Observer. Several students have claimed that 230 students of the approximate 300 enrolled in the module received an A grade. The exam was worth 100% and featured no negative marking. It was a 50 question multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ). Speaking to the University Observer, Conway, who sat the exam, “there was an old exam that a student produced...that was going around between us and we saw that paper before we’d gone in.” Aoife Sheahey, a third year medicine student admitted, “this year, someone in the year below me asked my friend for the notes she had for Cell-Cell and since my friend knew I had the questions and answers from sitting the repeat she asked me for them. I gave them to her to pass on and I told her to encourage them to pass them to everyone in their year and they did.” This is not the first occurrence of exam questions being leaked for this particular module. Multiple students who sat the exam last year and had to repeat, spoke about their experience. Students who had failed the module previously arranged private meetings with Dr. Baugh, the module coordinator. Sheahey was one of those students and this meeting provided her with the images that were

30TH JANUARY 2018 VOLUME XXIV ISSUE5 UNIVERSITYOBSERVER.IE

distributed throughout the second year class. Another student, Claire Mitchell* stated that during her meeting with Dr. Baugh “he showed me the MCQ which he had printed and asked did I have any questions etc. He told me to have a good look at the paper and hinted heavily that the repeat would be very similar to the original exam.” Dr. Baugh left Mitchell alone with the exam paper, “He told me to take down some notes but not to copy the MCQs directly. I spent a good half an hour alone with the paper, which was plenty of time for me to take down notes on every MCQ that came up and their answers.” This description was echoed by Sheahey who added that “The final exam contained about 80-90% of these questions.” The University Observer has seen copies of the images circulated before the exam. When asked for comment by the University Observer, Dr. Baugh stated: “I have never provided students with exam questions ahead of resit exams. I have allowed students to review, under supervision, the exam paper that they sat and failed so that they can identify topics they need assistance with. Students have never been allowed to copy questions or take exam papers from my office. Students taking this module are explicitly informed that the School does not release past MCQ papers.” The resit exam for PHYS20050 Cell-Cell Communication is set for Week 5 of Semester 2.

OTWO LIFESTYLE MAGAZINE INSIDE

MARIA KELLY INTERVIEW WITH A RISING STAR IN IRISH MUSIC DYLAN O’NEILL PAGE 14

IRISH FILM SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON THE BEST OF IRISH FILMS ALEXANDER GLOVER PAGE 13

ALMOST 4000 UCD STUDENTS FAILED MODULES LAST YEAR

RUTH MURPHY DEPUTY EDITOR The University Observer has obtained details of repeats in 2016/2017 under the Freedom of Information Act 2014. In this year, 3873 students failed at least one module. This excludes students who missed exams due to a leave of absence or had extenuating circumstances. UCD received at least three quarters of a million euro in repeat and resit fees. In semester one of last year, 288 UCD students repeated entire modules and were awarded a grade.

This therefore does not include students who paid to redo the module but failed it. This number increased in semester two to 783. Numbers were higher for students who only repeated exams and not the full module. 737 students received a grade for a repeat exam in the first semester, with this figure rising to 1567 in semester two. Last year a total of 2096 students failed more than one module. 1763 failed more than one module in semester one and 333 failed multiple modules in semester two. The number of students who failed modules varied across different areas with 1190 students, the highest for any subject, failing at least one module in Mathematics and Statistics. The lowest failure rate was in Education where only two students failed a module. Economics featured the second highest number of fails based on numbers alone with 892 students failing at least one module. The schools of Languages, Cultures, and Linguistics; English, Film, and Drama;

History; Business; and Medicine followed with 869, 841, 594, 540, and 480 fails, respectively. Law featured just 144 fails whereas the relatively small Veterinary Medicine had 346 students who failed a module. Information previously obtained by the University Observer revealed that in 2014/2015, 16 modules had a failure rate of 100%. Several of these modules however, had just one or two students. Earlier in the year a committee was established in UCD in partnership with UCDSU to review fees for resitting exams and retaking modules. At the time the committee was announced, Education Officer Robert Sweeney told the University Observer: “UCD students view the fees as unreasonably high as it has become financially crippling in many cases.” A decision is expected to be announced regarding a possible change in resit and repeat fees in the coming semester.

BOOJUM! A NEW BOOJUM IS OPENING IN DUBLIN (BUT NOT IN UCD) AOIFE MUCKIAN PAGE 21

YEAR OF THE WOMAN A FASHION SHOOT TO CELEBRATE 100 YEARS OF VOTING RIGHTS FOR IRISH WOMEN PAGE 22 30TH JANUARY 2018 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.